White Feminism Nearing Endpoint

by W.F. Price on January 15, 2014

I have learned so much about the development of feminism at this point that the big picture is coming into sharper focus even as I’m starting to turn my attention to other matters.

For example, I can say with certainty that modern feminism as a mass movement (as opposed to a fringe of disaffected misfits) was born the day that women were included in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which put all women – even white ones – in the same “disadvantaged” category as minorities. This was the work of a segregationist white, Southern senator who was obviously trying to dilute the impact of affirmative action.

The Civil Rights Act thereby gave companies and feminist activists a financial incentive to promote women of any race. Incentives matter, and quite a lot. Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem just hopped on the bandwagon — they were merely hucksters who made little – if any – difference.

Now, we are getting to the point where white women are no longer seen as deserving beneficiaries of affirmative action.

In Seattle, of all places, white women’s disadvantaged status has been called into question in a major construction project:

A group of white women is threatening to sue if the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) removes them from a program that helps women and minority-owned businesses get work on highway projects.

WSDOT hired a consultant to conduct a disparity study last year to determine if women and specific minority groups are continuing to experience discrimination when it comes to being awarded contracts on public works projects.

Colorado-based BBC Research and Consulting issued a 678-page report last May that found firms owned by white women are winning enough jobs and don’t need the extra help afforded them in the federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) program. Federal rules give DBEs a leg up on winning contracts on highway projects, as general contractors must hire disadvantaged firms to perform a set percentage of a project.

Many white women who own DBE-certified firms are opposed to the change. A newly formed group, Women in Highway Construction, is threatening a lawsuit, arguing that discrimination is alive and well in Washington state.

“Oh my gosh yes. They (men in the industry) don’t want to talk to you, they don’t want to deal with you, they’re very uncomfortable dealing with you,” said Colleen Hallett, who owns Mobile Electrical Distributors in Seattle. “I have salesmen come in here and bypass me and go straight to my male employees even though I’m the boss.”

The disparity study found that other minority groups continue to suffer “substantial disparities,” including businesses owned by African American, Asian-Pacific Americans, Hispanics, Native Americans and South Asians.

“While the other firms (minority groups) got little to no work, white women-owned firms continued to get work for that time (considered in the study). That was good for that group, but the other firms didn’t get much work,” said Brenda Nnambi, WSDOT’s Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity.

Based on the results of the study, WSDOT is seeking a waiver from the U.S. Department of Transportation to remove white women-owned firms from being counted toward project DBE goals. The waiver is being sought after white women have been included in the program for 31 years.

“The study revealed that Caucasian women-owned firms actually received more contract dollars than expected,” wrote WSDOT Assistant Communications Director Kris Rietmann in a December 16 press release. “Lacking evidence of discrimination against Caucasian women-owned business in the local marketplace, WSDOT cannot include them in contract-specific DBE goals.”

This inclusion of women-owned firms under affirmative action has been a great boon to a number of white men who happen to have good wives. Just keep the company in your wife’s name, and it qualifies as a “disadvantaged” business. Affirmative action for white women has not done much for singlemoms, but it’s made a lot of rich white folks’ lives easier (their daughters could take advantage of affirmative action), and it has raised some others into the middle class or above. Those who can keep their marriages together despite having working wives have probably fared best. Overall, due to the negative effects on family formation, it’s probably a wash, but possibly somewhat better for whites than if they were entirely denied affirmative action.

But now the jig is up. It had to end eventually. This grand coalition has too many takers today, and something must give. Apparently, that will be white women’s privileges under affirmative action.

White women are not taking this graciously:

“This is a war on white women, and we’re not going to take it sitting down,” said Mary Guthmiller, who owns DBE Electric. “It’s going to cost the state of Washington a lot more grief and trouble to fight an injunctive action which we are willing to take if necessary to protect our right to be able to exist as businesses and participate in the program that we fought hard alongside our other minority businesses to even have any little bit of this construction dollar.”

At a public meeting Thursday in Shoreline, women told WSDOT officials the study which showed white women are not discriminated against is flawed. They cited several examples including that not enough women were interviewed for the report. Many also complained that the study counted inflated contract dollar amounts won by white women-owned businesses. The consultant counted the contract amounts promised to white women, not what was actually paid.

I’m afraid the white women are going to lose this battle. Today, white women are outnumbered by nonwhites in the Democrat coalition, and the numbers count. I’ve predicted for years now that ethnic concerns would eventually trump sexual politics, but I think a lot of people will be surprised by how quickly white women abandon feminism when it no longer provides them with any material benefits. This hasn’t quite come to pass yet, but the writing is on the wall.

{ 70 comments… read them below or add one }

Tom Smith January 15, 2014 at 12:25

We knew feminism was all about “taking” by the white women, not giving back. The irony here is that white women have benefitted perhaps more than the minorities the Civil Rights Act was supposed to protect (and benefit).

Perhaps it is time for all of the so-called “affirmative action” programs to disappear. In my opinion, public preferences should be based on merit alone- not the color of one’s skin or one’s gender.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 61 Thumb down 1
joeb January 15, 2014 at 12:43

Another great example of Feminists feeling the backlash of equality . When the suffragette where marching on washington. I wonder if one of them said ,” What if our movement get hijacked by Radfems and we become a target of entitled american welfare princesses .
Ill bet they Hate the Poor people even more Today . Oh well its all the patriarchs fault anyways .
Anyways it sounds like a great reality show ” Who is the most unqualified ” We will find out 6.00 eastern time on Lifetime .

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 2
Uncle Elmer January 15, 2014 at 12:48

It is standard practice in tech industries serving the government market for the actual male operators to name their wives as owners to milk female-owned business set-asides.

“Women in Highway Construction”, now that is a laff riot.

I wonder if Salon will cover this story.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 60 Thumb down 4
John Savage January 15, 2014 at 12:59

Then, does it follow that if elite white women, who are the primary beneficiaries, are removed from feminism that the popularity of the movement implodes due to the absence of its prime movers?

If so, I can see that ‘white, twinkling star in the sky above my tor… and my heart is smote with HOPE!’ that the shadow of feminism will soon be displaced by the blinding light of justice…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 1
Ahaon January 15, 2014 at 13:12

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 49
Bob Smith January 15, 2014 at 13:35

White women may abandon feminism, but they won’t abandon liberalism.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 1
The Other Jim January 15, 2014 at 13:59

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

White women(& other constituent groups) of the Socialist Democrat Party are going to learn the hard way that the “Equal Rights” racket has a hierarchy and white women aren’t at the top of that hierarchy. When it comes to Identity politics and aggrieved victimhood status, white women will find out how far they are from the top.

I’ve seen this process before when living in the UK where Women’s Rights, Gay Rights, liberal Jews, Environmentalists, et al. all were trumped by the pandering to Muslims. My fellow Americans, and ladies especially, I have seen your future and it sucks.

If the UK and Europe are any indication, then women, especially white women are going to learn quite harshly that honor killings, acid attacks, child sex slavery, sex grooming and trafficking, spousal abuse and murder, child abuse, non-Muslim no-go areas, hate crimes, limitations on free speech, real homophobia, anti-semitism, mob violence, etc. are all going to be excused away and permitted so as to not offend the sensibilities of Muslims. Even if it comes at the expense of Women and Gays. At least that’s been the experience of women, gays, liberal Jews, et al. in the UK, Europe, Canada, and Australia. Perhaps America’s will be different but I doubt it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 43 Thumb down 5
geographybeefinalisthimself January 15, 2014 at 14:07

“White women are not taking this graciously”

“I’m afraid the white women are going to lose this battle.”

As far as the first quote, call it what it is: white women throwing a massive temper tantrum that makes your average two-year-old look like a paragon of maturity.

As for the second quote, I hope you are right, and that their loss rages like a fireball across the United States.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 2
Towgunner January 15, 2014 at 14:39

We should welcome this development. In high finance, if one excludes sex there is absolutely NO diversity at all, save for the token Indians and Asians, which need no AA. I’ve long since observed that feminism has been helping those people who, measured in things that matter, need the least help of all – white women…and, worse, white women from upper middle to upper class. Oh, and ones that are physically appealing etc. Its total bullcrap. If anything we should be flaming the fires of resentment here, tell Latino and African American women – why aren’t you an investment banking associate, why? Those women will eat the white ones alive and they should have the call into barry the potus to lay on jamie diamond and goldman sachs. We all know that women are overly sensitive to jealousy. Of course, divide team woman and their finished.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 3
tiredofitall January 15, 2014 at 15:00

“Oh my gosh yes. They (men in the industry) don’t want to talk to you, they don’t want to deal with you, they’re very uncomfortable dealing with you,” said Colleen Hallett, who owns Mobile Electrical Distributors in Seattle. “I have salesmen come in here and bypass me and go straight to my male employees even though I’m the boss.”

Can’t imagine why. It’s not like women in any business have a chip on their shoulders and men are one poor word choice away from getting bitched out for it.

Personally I’d rather deal with a guy and not have that hanging over my head threatening to get me sued/fired at a woman’s behest.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 58 Thumb down 0
TFH January 15, 2014 at 15:09

Bob Smith,

White women may abandon feminism, but they won’t abandon liberalism.

When even the GOP is drifting leftward, why would white women do that?

America’s two parties are far-left and center-left. There is no chance of government spending being cut even to the levels of 2007 (!), let alone a time further back than that.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 2
Fubsy January 15, 2014 at 15:47

Lol, I remember many, many years ago 60 Minutes did an expose on all the female owned contracting companies that were only being fronted by wives or women for men in order to qualify for the lucrative government contracts.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 0
greyghost January 15, 2014 at 15:50

The only reason this is happening is that “they” are running out of other peoples money. The work they are getting may not be what it takes. Besides that pay a man 50k a year he takes care of a family including a woman. Pay a woman 70k and there are still other expenses.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 2
joeb January 15, 2014 at 16:17

You know what would bring up the Hopes of entitled white women , If we could Just have another war . Nothing Makes them Happier then Guys dieing . ( besides watching a circumcision )
You know White Knights Just aren’t doing enough . All busy starting there Little groups Like Menstoppingviolence and fatherandFamilies .
to Take Care of the Needs of The white women in Business .
These truely selfish Pusyhounds are to busy with there Own needs to Stop and have a little war time for the Girls .
You know go away see exciting country’s Give the Housewife a Break so She can give you one more Illegitimate child . Is that to much to ask for.
There’s Just a certain Lazyness in the WKs and pssyhounds in the Modern Times . Back in the Old days , This sort of white female Unhappiness would have been addressed with a Holiday or a new work saving Kitchen appliance Today . Nothing .
Sad days indeed .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
Jensen January 15, 2014 at 17:10

My niece recently lost her bullshit nonprofit artsy-fartsy “job” to a young, gay black male: she told me that this is the new preferred victim-grievance group. The US is turning into a Fellini movie.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 1
Anonymous Reader January 15, 2014 at 17:16

Sorry, Welmer, I’m very skeptical of your prediction.

My prediction: WADOT will cave in under pressure from Senator Patty Murray and other powerful white, female, politicians.

There is a much, much easier solution to pie-cutting than actually removing white women from perpetual victim status: double down on cutting men in general, but particuarly “white” men* out of the pie entirely.

I point to the recent Shriver circus, featuring Beyonce, as evidence. The ruling party is clearly doubling down on the “War On Women” screed, and that means in reality a doubling down on misandry.

*It is interesting that the US government includes Latin American men (Mexican, Central and South American, Puerto Rican, Cuban, etc.) in the category of “white” for some purposes, and in the category of “Hispanic” for other purposes. For pie-cutting purposes, it could go either way.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 0
DW3 January 15, 2014 at 17:30

I have never figured out how 50% of the population plus whatever percentages are visible minorities and sexual deviants added up could be considered a minority being oppressed by the majority.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 0
gender foreigner January 15, 2014 at 18:11

Let’s actively and consciously pursue and exacerbate the divisions within team girl. Down with the white woman, okay by me, (then we must deal with the rest of our tormentors)…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 0
epoche* January 15, 2014 at 19:01

But now the jig is up. It had to end eventually. This grand coalition has too many takers today, and something must give. Apparently, that will be white women’s privileges under affirmative action.
————————————————————
I wouldnt count on any of these groups giving up any advantages whatsoever they will merely come up with new rationalizations. Remember the original purpose of affirmative action was to remedy past grievances, when that was accomplished the new rationalization became diversity for all these programs. They will merely change the goalposts. It wont mean anything good for us. From

http://www.menstribune.com/feminist.htm

Women caused many of our laws to be created with the intent of targeting male behavior. But now that they are taking over the traditional roles of men, women are moving into the sights of the very same legislation that they created. This leaves feminists working overtime to make up excuses for the criminal behavior of women, just as they labor to invent new entitlement programs, tax credits, and child support increases that offset the money that women pay in taxes.

The collectivist tendency even taken at its best, with “Big Sister” standing in for the all-protective Mother Earth, destroys the strong while protecting the weak. As strength and independence disappear, creativity eventually goes with them, and hence the means to create new technologies needed to support higher populations of these weak and dependent individuals. As this “victimization” philosophy reaches extreme proportions, demographic groups are categorized as to the degree which they are “at risk” and in need of differential protection from Big Sister.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 0
gu January 15, 2014 at 19:22

“Careful there Bill. Some of the Anti-Semites who read and comment at this blog will be upset reading that the Jews aren’t the source and reason for all the evil causes and effects of feminism.”

Is there anything more repulsive than a philosemite piece of shit that cannot handle the notion that there are people who don’t walk around with blinders?

Listen shabbos goy, there is absolutely zero doubt that Jews are essentially behind this charade. The fact that this would actually make a lot of people, that you were told were “uneducated”, right (by Jew owned media), doesn’t mean it’s not actually true.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 45 Thumb down 20
Nemo January 15, 2014 at 20:40

There are some interesting side effects from this policy.

Single white guys won’t even bother starting small businesses in categories that require significant government contracting work. So, that impedes job growth and the lessening of competition makes it more expensive for the govt. to purchase goods and services. That in turn increase spending with no benefit to the taxpayer.

Married white guys who have two brain cells to rub together won’t expand their wife-owned businesses by hiring more than one or two more workers. If they create a self-sustaining business, then wifey can divorce them and get a viable business in her name, for free, plus half of his stuff and alimony.

The incentives are all pointing against creating a big business that has the critical mass to survive the absence of the husband. Once he dies or divorces, that’s the end of the business. That’s not good for capitalism or job growth.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 0
Harcomas January 15, 2014 at 22:36

White women have ridden on the gravy train for a long time now, and they’ve had a nice ride.

But their day of reckoning is at hand. Few will be saved. Most will be damned forever.

But then, so will most other women — and men — regardless of race.

Feminism is still only one symptom of a spiritually ill world. The devil wants us to think that everything would be back to normal if only we got rid of feminism. This is how the devil fools us into accepting homosexuals as political allies, for example. It’s how he fools us into taking for granted the secular, modern world with its false, worldly values. If one day, the anti-male laws on the books today were repealed, and western women were better behaved, it would still not be enough — far from it.

No one is off the hook, not even men. We are all sinners, and undeserving of God’s grace, which He deigns to grant to only those who humble themselves before Him. Without the traditional Catholic faith, we are all hell bound. In fact, lack of such faith is the reason western women became bad on such a wide scale. It was divine punishment.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 20
Karlo January 15, 2014 at 22:46

Too bad I just turned 54 years old .. .. .. I’ve put up with the FEMALE crap for over 30-years and it has cost me so much money and mental anguish in that time. Although this may be the beginning of the end for them …. there are still a couple of generations of immature females that grew up with entitlement minded mothers that will have to be dealt with, I don’t see the end reaching a peak for another 20 years, if I make it that long I’ll be 74 and I am beginning to feel tired of the fight, like I just went 12 rounds with Muhammad Ali. This is just round 1 with many to follow, it would be nice to be able to live a healthy coherent life to 110 just to see the entitlement girls fall on their faces and get bloody noses all to their own doing ….. won’t they love there mothers then ( ? ).

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 0
Anonymous January 15, 2014 at 23:11

“White Feminism Nearing Endpoint”

And it’s Christless, fire-worshipping, head-chopping, blood-drinking, thuggee-begetting step-cousin – Indian feminism – has only just begun.

You think white feminism was bad. Go to India and learn what ‘misandry’ really means.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 0
Dan the man January 16, 2014 at 00:34

@Gu I think Price was actually counting them as white. Yeah, lets not commit thinkcrime, or even look like we are.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
FTLOTBP January 16, 2014 at 01:28

How about this: instead of racial bickering, why don’t white, black, yellow, and red men all cooperate – for ONE YEAR – and bring down feminism. Then everyone can resume their racial bickering. Can’t all do that? OK, white men, you guys drop out of the system: quit your jobs and go off grid, expat, or whatever you need to do. Just stop supporting the dearies and daddygov. It will collapse much sooner.

Hell, you bitches can’t do that either? Damn, well, you guys are useless. Modern “men” are worse than the feminists. Feminists NEVER – including TODAY – had power that MEN did not give them. You are your own enslavement because you won’t stand up for yourselves. Feminists are standing outside your cell, but the cell door is open, and you have the keys and a gun. Idiots.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 12
DCM January 16, 2014 at 02:51

“Bob Smith January 15, 2014 at 13:35

White women may abandon feminism, but they won’t abandon
liberalism”

That’s true. They have so many dependency needs and such abhorrence of work they’ll follow any creed that promises them wealth and sloth while praising their “hard work” and “martyrdom” to the skies.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0
ode January 16, 2014 at 03:53

Bob says:

White women may abandon feminism, but they won’t abandon liberalism.

Women are not inherently “Liberal”. They have no loyalty. They will follow whatever “ideology – ism” that best promises comfort and security.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 0
Anonymous January 16, 2014 at 03:59

As white male and a millennial, I’m very glad to hear that white feminism could be running out of fuel. (I don’t doubt it.)

Let it continue.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Jacob Ian Stalk January 16, 2014 at 04:23

“White Feminism Nearing Endpoint”

Perhaps, but its maniacal, bloodthirsty, head-chopping, enraged cousin – Indian Feminism – is just beginning. If you think white feminism was bad, just wait till things get going in India. A wave of evil is coming to that country the likes of which have not been seen since the time of the Great Flood. Men of the west, consider yourselves fortunate indeed that by Christ’s heel you are saved, for it isn’t the serpent your Indian brothers will contend with, it is the very devil himself.

Pray for them. For the love of God, pray for them.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Thomas Tell-Truth January 16, 2014 at 05:17

The leftwing complex is a coalition of disparate groups held together by a common narrative of conflict with a universal class enemy..Straight white males. These groups have little in common. Without the narrative of conflict, they would be at one another’s throats. Now that they have achieved their goals, they are beginning to turn on their own. The first group to lose their victim card will be white females.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 1
Mike43 January 16, 2014 at 05:54

“Oh my gosh yes. They (men in the industry) don’t want to talk to you, they don’t want to deal with you, they’re very uncomfortable dealing with you,” said Colleen Hallett, who owns Mobile Electrical Distributors in Seattle. “I have salesmen come in here and bypass me and go straight to my male employees even though I’m the boss.”

If you are in sales, I would think the last person you would approach, would be the owner. Their time is valuable, and you need to convince a lower level employee that the goods and services you are selling is good for their company.

So what she’s taking as an insult, is merely recruitment of an advocate for their products in the company. That advocate will approach the owener, and pitch the product.

Most owners don’t want a cold pitch, that’s what lower level employees are there for.

Women, danged if you do, danged if you don’t…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Ahaon January 16, 2014 at 06:08

gu,

Keep drinking your Kool-Aid, pal.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 14
continent January 16, 2014 at 08:19

Several days ago Maria Shriver appeared on NBC Evening News with Brian Williams to issue sc “Shriver Report”. If I remember correctly, she stated that women only make 71 cents for every dollar men make.
But as usual, she did not define what kind of work each gender does. It’s unlikely that Maria Shriver ever worked in highwasy construction or reapirs.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 1
Norm January 16, 2014 at 08:45

Maria Shriver (the real governer of Kalifphornia a few years back), said in Time that not enough is spent on women’s health issues. In the UK, there is a demographic shift as many cultures are using sex selection abortions. Surprisingly the Feminazis are vewy vewy quite on it. They don’t know how to react.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/cristinaodone/100254691/gendercide-the-silence-of-the-so-called-feminists/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel January 16, 2014 at 09:04

continent
If I remember correctly, she stated that women only make 71 cents for every dollar men make. But as usual, she did not define what kind of work each gender does.

I despise the dishonesty of that little factoid. The 71 cents number is the gross pay gap. i.e. the difference between the average of what all working women are paid versus the average of what all working men are paid. Working women make less on average because they make different work choices. Duh.

But women suck up this disinformation. They’re not interested in the facts behind the propaganda. That single women under age 30 make MORE than single men doing the SAME work. The 71 cents number proves they’re “exploited.” Because, patriarchy.

It’s also one more example of toasted ice. A woman wants to marry a man that makes more money than she does but she also believes women should be paid the same as men regardless of the type of work they do. The hamster spins away the logical inconsistency even if the woman is capable of seeing it in the first place.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 39 Thumb down 0
tiredofitall January 16, 2014 at 12:06

“White women have ridden on the gravy train for a long time now, and they’ve had a nice ride.

But their day of reckoning is at hand. Few will be saved. Most will be damned forever.

But then, so will most other women — and men — regardless of race. ” – Harcomas

Well, you’re mostly right. The women will be shit out of luck*, regardless of skin color or ethnicity. The men will do as we’ve done since the dawn of time, soldier on and survive.

*The only women who’ll join us will be the ones smart enough to de-bitchify themselves and latch on to a provider. (As they’ve one since the dawn of time.)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
Dire Badger January 16, 2014 at 13:02

Frankly, I think Ahnold should have ditched the bitch decades earlier.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
continent January 16, 2014 at 14:47

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2014/01/15/awesome-forbes-calls-out-shriver-reports-war-on-women-agenda-n1779425
Charles Martel,
I had never seen your expression of”toasted ice” but I llike it/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Bluedrgn January 16, 2014 at 14:52

I certainly hope so… the death of feminism can’t come soon enough.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
greyghost January 16, 2014 at 16:10

Harcomas
One sin at a time screw what the devil thinks. Gods grace comes from faith and not righteous deeds to empress other men about how godly you are. Feminism, is a good start.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
Gilgamesh January 16, 2014 at 20:08

Want a feminist race war? Try doing something like 4chan’s operation bikini bridge

http://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/7694-operation-bikini-bridge/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Jaego January 16, 2014 at 21:21

I’m watching a great mini-series on youtube from the 80′s. You guys might like it. It’s about a Russian takeover of America and how Americans react to it and how the Russians react to their reactions. Great performances by Kris Kristoferson and Marie Hemingway and others whose names I don’t know. One of the best portrayals of female evil ever by the wife of the rebel leader, played by Kristoferson. She takes his children and helps get him locked up. Other performances show the confused and excited female response to foreign tyranny. Be warned: one very good woman is portrayed. It’s 13 parts. Here’s number one. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU49MR19CcA

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
chinesefootsoldier January 16, 2014 at 22:40

It’s my policy to always discriminate against white feminists on the grounds of race, knowing full well they can’t truly retaliate because nobody on their side takes racism against whites seriously.

I highly recommend this strategy, even if you are white. It’s a very effective divide & conquer tactic, and leaves white feminists very little room to defend themselves psychologically. They are forced to either:

A. Become more extreme and self loathing to compensate (and extremism is always inversely correlated with popularity)
B. Feel depressed, harassed, and hated, which can lead to
C. Questioning of left wing solidarity, and a re-examination of her leftist beliefs vis-a-vis her own victimhood

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
chinesefootsoldier January 16, 2014 at 23:02

Btw, I bet all the white women are social justice lefties.

Look at them, clutching onto their victimhood. Like it’s the dearest thing in the world to them.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
AE Hall January 17, 2014 at 04:39

I’m looking forward to the day when white feminists finally wake up to the reality of the role which race plays in their favored issues.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Vektor January 17, 2014 at 05:40

More cracks in the dam (or the dyke if you prefer…pun intended). I hope so.

However, we will still have to contend with Hillary. Women will be her target audience and she will whip the victim narrative into an absolute frenzy the likes of which we have never seen before. She will also promise women laws, privileges, money, etc. to the moon. I think the process has already started with that Maria Shriver rant. Expect the media machine to crank out the man-hate like never before. Should be quite a spectacle to see. Good. Shine the brightest light possible on this hateful and poisonous ideology.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer January 17, 2014 at 06:23

Bill. thought you would enjoy this as you live in Seattle. There is a hot market right now in “coding bootcamps for women” which are cram courses to qualify females for work in the software industry. The video is funny because it is self-parodizing, with the narrative itself seemingly computer-generated.

“Everyday high-tech businesses and startups throughout Seattle…want more diversity, and they are “desperate” for female coders and engineers…”

Desperate why? Because the government is demanding it, not because of innate business needs.

I wanted to pen an essay “What’s Really Going On in Those Coding Bootcamps for Women?” complete with some vintage lez B&D cartoons, but have some coding deadlines of my own right now.

http://www.king5.com/news/local/Woman-coding-bootcamp-215337331.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Szebran January 17, 2014 at 07:26

“Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinem just hopped on the bandwagon — they were merely hucksters who made little – if any – difference.”

I dont think they were hucksters. I think they were prime movers who promoted their female chauvinist agenda. They simply took advantage of the situation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader January 17, 2014 at 08:57

Elmer mentioned coding bootcamps. A fundamental premise of feminism is that men and women are exactly the same (except women can have babies). “Innie” vs. “outie” plumbing is the only difference.

So if there are fewer wimmenz than menz in computer science, it must because Teh Patriarchy! And Sexism! And Bad Men! Because the alternative – that estrogen shapes women’s brain structure in a different manner than testosterone shapes men’s brain structure, and so it is more difficult for women to think in the ways required for computer science, that’s CrimeThink!

So we have coder boot camps that double down on the whole blank-slate, nurture-is-all-because-genes-don’t-matter anti-scientific blather that underlies feminism. Feminists will have to become ever more opposed to science, as PET scans and other studies of the brain continue to discover the real, physical differences between men and women.

At some point, we’ll be told that “science is sexism”…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Anonymous Reader January 17, 2014 at 08:59

Say, Elmer, I wonder what language the Puget Sound area coder camps are teaching teh wimmenz. Maybe it’s C+=, perhaps?

Here’s a ref page for C+=, for your enjoyment.

https://github.com/ErisBlastar/cplusequality

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Dan the man January 17, 2014 at 11:08

@Szebran Gloria Steinem is a bankrolled, and trained CIA change agent. @Uncle Elmer More jobs for women at the expense of men.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
Tam the Bam January 17, 2014 at 13:23

“So we have coder boot camps that double down on the whole blank-slate, nurture-is-all-because-genes-don’t-matter anti-scientific blather that underlies feminism.”
Now then, AR, I am so excited I can barely hold my wee-wee in. Awaiting the point where *that thing* arrives, where you’re flying blind and the libraries are bare. But you haveta get it done or .. you don’t get paid.

(OFC I know fuck-nothing about it, it ain’t made of wood. But before Crimbo I had to tranquilize one of the neighbors, a maffs wiz & coder, (good guy) by taking him to a nearby *smoking* bar (very rare, we are truly blessed) and stuffing frightening amounts of unfeasible Italian&40%ABV-based cocktails into him to counteract the Monster and Relentless (caffeine poisoning), after he’d done something like 2 1/2 days straight on the same chair, on top of weeks of the same crap (nutrients piped in) sorting out the Deathstar (revered on your world as the RBS inhouse systems and shit, the whole megilah. Fella won’t talk, it’s all Secret Squirl, but I did try, guys. And his wife now hates me for sending him back in an absolute state. Again.)

Funnily enough, there were (a) no girls anywhere on that job, and (b) no forners.
Oh wait a minute, because Patriarchy. The money was remarkably upscale. Teh menz musta conspired to exclude the brilliant wimminz and visa-chaps.
Although TBF he don’t care about the money that much (wife & kids will piss it up the wall in a heartbeat), as far as he can explain it, he was gripped by a kind of ‘spergy fury of “Honor Will Be Satisfied, I AM THE CODE-GOD.. !! jeezus, whatta mess …… now .. there must be a lazy shortcut I can rig up here ..?”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader January 17, 2014 at 15:01

Tam ye Bam
stuffing frightening amounts of unfeasible Italian&40%ABV-based cocktails into him to counteract the Monster and Relentless

Makes me miss Jolt cola, it does. “All the caffeine and twice the sugar”.
Bourbon and Jolt, for those special times when fun takes priority over sleep…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Dire Badger January 17, 2014 at 16:07
Anonymous Reader January 17, 2014 at 17:14

as far as he can explain it, he was gripped by a kind of ‘spergy fury of “Honor Will Be Satisfied, I AM THE CODE-GOD.. !!

Another version that a friend of mine once said (with slightly trembling fingers”:

“The code flowed from my fingers all night…”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Dan the man January 17, 2014 at 21:48

@Dire Badger My God! Logic is abuse now. Guess I will shut up, put on my apron, and do the dishes like a good little Herb.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Dire Badger January 18, 2014 at 11:11

@Dan- Don’t bother. Doing dishes in silence also classifies as abuse.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man January 18, 2014 at 20:21

For a long time women particulary white women have put down men especially white men and if they complained they were called “wimps”,”sissies” or “afraid of losing their position”. Now that the shoe is on the other foot these women,these wimpish sissies are afraid of losing their position.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man January 18, 2014 at 20:31

Joeb,

The truth about feminism: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/search?q=suffragettes

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man January 19, 2014 at 13:13

In Schwarzenegger’s defense he did sign paternity fraud protection legislation into law. This law protects men from paternity fraud.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Kevin T January 20, 2014 at 17:13

“Check your privilege,” they said…

I got yer privilege check right fuggin here…heh heh heh…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
All Heart January 22, 2014 at 07:12

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 16
Anonymous Reader January 22, 2014 at 14:50

Yawn.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
All Heart January 22, 2014 at 16:06

Is someone being a sleepy bear… :)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 7
Anonymous Reader January 22, 2014 at 16:25

No. You are boring.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Towgunner January 23, 2014 at 13:10

@ all heart:

dads staying at home is a awful option, here is why:

First off there is no career protection for a man, so, if he stays at home, there are no quotas or affirmative action that will give him a job if he gets divorced. Second, he will very likely get divorced. Third, fat chance that he’d ever get any alimony.

Why do you think that having a man stay at home is progressive? Its only progressive because you watch way too much tv and you have been memorized by this notion of the “career woman”. If you weren’t brainwashed by mass media, guess what, you’d be perfectly fine staying at home.

feminism tells women that staying at home is beneath them and dishonorable. So, if that’s what women think why should men have to assume a position that is this undesirable? I don’t understand…you say “don’t be a stay at home mom!! Its awful dehumanizing evil!! And today, there is this push from feminist to put men into that position? Are you saying that you want to harm men? I think that’s what it is.

Look, if staying at home is so awful and dehumanizing than men and all people should avoid it. Your side said it not me.

Finally, you want men to stay at home because you ultimately want to masturbate your ego. And true to form of a woman, just like it is with reality tv, you want to have people that you can feel superior to.

Its twisted and diabolical. One thing you can count on is that the Men’s movement is going to inform men to NOT to do this! So, too bad so sad, your ego is just going to have to deal with it.

And the only reason why you have women more “equal” is because the government forced it on us, unwillingly. Those “men” you see on the playground are suffering…you don’t care.

As for children…the ego with your women never stops. A developing child is best left with a female, that’s the optimal way to raise them. But even the needs of a innocent child is way down on the list for women today.

Forget it. We’re taking feminism down. You think you’re superior to men, and your not…not even close.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Towgunner January 23, 2014 at 13:25

@ all heart:

You are so lost.

“I have personaly struggled with my own perception of myself, my body and my feminity and what our culture tells me I have to be to have any worth.”

Some wine to go with your cheese – pathetic! Here’s some advice, stop caring what other people think…when you really do that you’ll feel and be more liberated then any women’s studies class could ever give you.

“I hope we grow to a more accepting culture where men and women work together for each other.”

We had that and feminism decided that the needs of just women were more important than men and children. At present, that will never happen simply because feminism hates men. Doubt that, then why are women are openly calling men inferior in the same way that Nazis called Jews inferior. To me, women today are morally equivalent to Nazis.

“But there is still a lot of discrimination I think I do face in my everyday life as a woman.”

Waiter! More Cheese! More Wine! Stat! There IS a lot of discrimination today but its not against women, today MEN are being discriminated against. And its far worse than women ever had to endure because this is at the hands of a increasingly tyrannical government that men in turn give their money too (taxes). If you still feel you are falling behind or not living to your full potential…then its not discrimination, sorry to say, its YOU. You probably just suck, most women do. If women didn’t suck, you wouldn’t need the government or feminism. But you do, so…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man January 28, 2014 at 05:08

All heart,that was all bullshit. That is the same drek we heard back in the ’70′s and ’80′s how feminism was going to enrich both sexes. In the ’90′s we found out that was all bullshit and that we men were taken for a ride. With Lorena Bobbitt and Katherine Kieu Becker and the women who react positively to their crimes we see that feminism wasn’t about a loving woman leading us to a better place but a hateful feminazi concentration camp guard leading us men to our slaughter.

The truth about feminism: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2010/02/feminist-quotes.html
http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2011/10/feminist-quotes-2.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
link February 21, 2014 at 13:52

Employees approach the work with a more positive attitude.
Networking annd Social Networking websites
are a great resource for fiding legitimate wolrk online.
Typing, answering phone calls and emails, scheduling travel plans, and bookkeeping are a few of the many varied tasks a
virtual assistant may need to perform.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: