The Institutionalized Extortion of Heterosexual Men

by Joe Zamboni on July 5, 2013

Over the last few years, I have been increasingly wary of and doubtful about the motives of all women who wanted to have sex with me. There has been plenty of evidence to support this wariness. One woman, who I had not met prior to our brief discussion, without any apparent self-consciousness, proposed to have a child with me as soon as she heard the street on which I lived, a street with many expensive large houses overlooking a large body of water. When with another woman, after we had come back to my expensive house, which has several acres of gardens, just after our first date, and immediately after laying eyes on my property, she proposed that she would be my girlfriend. There had been no prior mention of any relationship, let alone sex.

To be seen by women as super-attractive and desirable just because I have significant financial resources disgusts me. It is objectification pure and simple. The last I heard, most women were strongly opposed to objectification, but their behavior shows that’s a lie. When I was not so well off, many women wouldn’t even give me the time of day. As I see it, American women are increasingly mercenary, or perhaps just significantly more willing to show their long-standing gold-digger inclinations. Some are even proud of what I am coming to appreciate is the intention to commit extortion.

I remember sitting in a restaurant at the Atlanta Airport, waiting for my connecting flight, and overhearing three middle-aged women talking at the next table. They made no effort to prevent those nearby from hearing them. They were all divorcees, and they were comparing how much loot they had extracted from their ex-husbands, as though it was a competition. They squealed with glee about the significant resources that they had gotten from their former mates. Nowhere in the discussion amongst these three was there any consideration of any adverse impact on those men. I was then shocked and dismayed that so many American women had become so blatantly money-hungry, heartless, and manipulative. Now I take it for granted.

More recently I have come to appreciate that Feminism has successfully changed American laws to establish the legalized extortion from heterosexual men, or at least from those men who are willing to have sex with a woman, and from those men who are still sufficiently reckless and clueless to marry an American woman. Yes, extortion technically is a crime, but through children and/or marriage, women can, and many do, legally engage in it. Consider the elements of the crime as defined by common law. Extortion is the: (1) present use of threat or force (2) of a future harm (3) to obtain money or resources (4) from another (5) with the intent to steal. We will take each of these five elements in turn, but I invite you, if you are an American, to consider the women in your life, and whether they too are engaged in some form of legalized extortion from men.

Regarding the use of (1) threat or force, consider false rape accusations. Without evidence or justification, a woman can unilaterally, and without any supporting evidence, have a man thrown in jail, can cause him to lose his job, and can cause him to lose his community reputation. Often used in retaliation for some perceived slight, such false rape accusations are a threat of force, a threat to get the power of the state to punish a man for doing what a woman doesn’t like. The very real possibility that a woman can do this, and get away with it, without being punished in any way, is an indication that she has the present power to threaten force. Thus, if they know what’s good for them, men had better not offend a woman, lest the woman call out the cops, and get these same men thrown into jail based on false rape accusations.

The same is true for claims of domestic violence. A woman, simply by calling the police, can bring the force of the state down on the man involved. Mandatory arrest laws require that the man be arrested. Never mind whether or not there actually was any domestic violence, and never mind who the perpetrator was. The power is held exclusively by the female, and if the male does not do as she wishes, the man will be made pay (if not financially, then certainly suffer via time in jail, being forced to move out of his own house, inconvenience to his life via an injunction, etc.).

A similar analysis applies to men who are behind in their child-support payments. As perverse as it may seem, a significant number of men who are behind in their child support payments are now thrown into jail. In some cases, their professional licenses and driver’s licenses are revoked. Never mind that these actions severely compromise their ability to pay child support. Logic is not the dominant motivation here. A display of power, and sending a strong message to men, that women control the power, that is the primary message that is being sent. And a showing of power is necessary as the first element of extortion.

Divorce-related child custody disputes provide another example. Women can, and in many cases actually do, falsely accuse the men of abusing their own children. The women, through these allegations, can cause men to be estranged and separated from their own children. Of course there are financial considerations here, such as the desire for more child support. The greater the percentage of time that the mother has the children, the more the child support will be. But taken from a wider perspective, it appears as though there is also an important message that is sent to men thereby, and that is that men had better comply with not only the desires of women, but also the dictates of the legal system.

You may ask “what about compassion for the fate of men?” There is none of that here, we have a systematic extortion process underway, where not only the woman gets money, but so do lawyers, psychologists, child support collection clerks, etc. This is a systemic government-supported racket with big money at stake. So forget about compassion for men, the institutionalized incentive systems that are now in place help to keep things the way they are.

The threat of force can also show up in allegations of sexual harassment at work. Even if men go their own way, and have nothing to do with women, they will in many cases be required to work with women. The threat of a sexual harassment complaint, and the very real possibility that the man could lose his job thereby, or have his reputation in an industry thereby tarnished, is a very real and serious threat. What about the prosecution of false accusers? Are you kidding? It’s just like false rape accusations, false domestic abuse allegations, and false child abuse allegations. The woman is virtually never prosecuted for her vengeful and/or extortionate display of power exerted in an effort to get the man to fork over the resources.

Many men ignorantly fail to see that they are living under a profound and serious threat that force will be used against them. For years I wondered why so many American men were acting like hopeless wimps when interacting with their wives. I was dismayed to note how they refused to stand-up for themselves, and refused to correct their wives when their wives were obviously in the wrong. Now I get it — they had at least unconsciously internalized the threat of force discussed here, and at least on some level they fully understood what they were up against. They dared not let people know they had any balls, that they might actually be able to stand up and be counted. Most slaves threatened with severe punishment do not generally stand-up for themselves.

Consider next the (2) future harm that a woman might do to a man. She could have him thrown in jail, could get him to pay her outrageous child support (entirely unrelated to actual child support needs), could get him to pay for another man’s child (paternity fraud), or could get him to pay lifelong or at least long-term alimony. She could force him to attend “anger management” classes (state-sponsored brainwashing as I see it). She could get him thrown in jail on criminal charges like rape, child abuse, stalking, or domestic violence. These future harms are exercised regularly, and both men and women are fully aware of how much more harsh the criminal justice system’s punishments are for men than they are for women. For example, as Bill Price has recently reported, American men are executed about 100 times more often then women. [Note 1]

The next element is the (3) money or resources obtained thereby. Most young women I know don’t want to be some high-powered corporate executive, or for that matter any other type of wage earner. Instead they want to stay home and have kids, and they want a man to make that possible by paying for her to live that lifestyle. On a basic level, it makes sense that women would want a man to provide resources so that her offspring can do well, but this fundamental old-fashioned motivation has been twisted for selfish monetary purposes, twisted to the point where it is no longer recognizable. The extortionate and forced transfer of money and resources from men to women is now at the expense of (a) male freedom, (b) male self-determination, and (c) basic human decency. The fact that men are thrown in jail for not paying child support, in many instances for not paying money they don’t have, that shows that this is not a system based on either a man’s ability to pay, or a policy intended to promote harmonious family arrangements. Thanks to misguided chivalry, the strident and ceaseless complaints of feminists, the compliant white-knight politicians who respond to the feminist demands, and the widespread greed of women, America’s legal system now provides for the institutionalized extraction of money and resources from heterosexual men.

Notice that this extraction (4) comes only from heterosexual men. These men are the sole target of the extraction process. Women, by and large, do not pay alimony, and they do not pay child support. Women do not, by and large, go to jail for domestic violence, stalking, or rape. Women are not generally accused of, nor do they generally lose jobs because of sexual harassment accusations. The heavy-duty punishments, directed at heterosexual men, are intended to make men pay. It’s as simple as that.

So, for example, if you never wanted a child with a particular woman who “got pregnant,” and you objected to becoming a father, it doesn’t matter. So what if she lied abut being on birth control? The woman is nonetheless supported by the legal system in collecting child support from you. Never mind that she can unilaterally get an abortion, or put the baby up for adoption, both without your permission. Nobody said this was fair. And let’s give up the myth that it’s about supporting children. That’s just the excuse used to legitimize the extortion. For example, a good number of men, who have proven with DNA evidence that they are not the fathers of certain children, are nonetheless forced by the courts to pay child support. [Note 2] You, the man, are going to be made to pay anyway. The man has absolutely no say in the matter.

Which brings us to the place where there is an (5) intention to steal behind all this. At some point in the past, I imagine some men and women, with good intentions, wanted to enter a partnership where they both contributed to raising a family. More recently in history, men got a job, and women stayed home and took care of the kids. That separation of duties may have made some sense in 1950, but it no longer does. While men are legally obliged to keep being the providers, women are no longer required live up to their side of the bargain. Instead, men are legally required to support women in their efforts to do whatever the hell they want with their lives (via tax dollars at the very least, for example having children on their own without any involvement of a man). The current arrangement is way beyond a lopsided allocation of gender-based financial responsibility, it is now outright extortion of heterosexual men. Under the current system, no matter what the woman does, men are forced to pay.

The Twisting Of Natural Impulses: It is natural, and I believe on some deeper level innate in heterosexual men, to want to give and support women and the family. But the current legal system has gone way beyond the desire to give and support. It has used that inclination, that desire, that deeper urge, and twisted it into something so draconian and oppressive, that for an increasing number of men who dispassionately and clearly see what is happening, all desire to give to a woman or “her” offspring (as she often puts it) evaporates.

A desire to give to the family, in mutuality, as a matter of choice, as a contribution to the welfare of the family — that could be a wonderful thing. But when this giving becomes a slavery-like institution, as it now has become in America, men are increasingly abandoning it, and with good reason. The statistics indicate what’s happening, and the laments from the women of child-bearing age, such as “where have all the good men gone?” are just another indication of the male abandonment of the family that’s now underway. Marriage rates in the USA in 2009 were 6.8 per 1000 people. This rate has steadily declined since 1970, at which point it was 10.6 per 1000 people. Note that 1970 was around the time when feminist lies and propaganda became well-entrenched in the American legal system. [Note 3]

In this case, the “good men,” as the women refer to them, are the men who are willing to put themselves in the saddle of husband and provider, with all the legal fetters that go along with that. There are still some brave (“ignorant” might be a better term) men who are willing to put themselves, their assets, their careers, and their reputations, at great risk, in the statistically unreasonable hope that the women they chose won’t call out the sheriff and have them manacled and bound into some sort of an institutionalized payment arrangement (divorce asset splits, alimony, and child support are the most widely employed mechanisms). These “good men” desperately need to get the message discussed herein.

It is perverse that the most illogical and primitive part of man, his innate desire for sex, partnership, and love with a woman, is used for, and played upon to effect, this institutionalized extortion. Men have historically been driven by instinct and hormones in this place, but they desperately now need to use their logical brains to understand what is really happening. So long as men don’t use a detached, rational, and objective perspective to see the institutionalized extortion that’s underway, they will continue to fall prey to the ploys of women surrounding marriage and children.

Institutionalized Abuse: Feminism has brought with it the illogical notion that women can do no harm, and when this myth is combined with nearly unchecked power, abuse will be the result. We see this same result in many areas, not just the institutionalized extortion of resources from men as discussed above. Consider a 2010 US Department of Justice study that examined the sexual abuse of teenagers in detention (juvenile halls, group homes, etc.) [Note 4]. This study surveyed 8,700 juveniles housed in 326 facilities, representing about 25% of the nation’s youth living in such detention facilities. Among the 10% of youths who admitted to being sexually abused, 92% said the abuse was perpetrated by females. That’s not a typo — that’s 92%.

Lovisa Stannow, the executive director of California-based non-profit Just Detention International, which advocates for the elimination of prison rape, had a very insightful comment about this same study. She said, “When you have an extreme power differential and absolute unchecked power, bad things start happening. When you combine this with a culture where sex abuse by females on males isn’t taken seriously, then you have the perfect set-up for women with all this power to get away with it.”

The same conclusion applies to the institutionalized extortion of resources by women from heterosexual men. It’s about time that more of us American men honestly acknowledged what’s happening to us. It’s about time that we older American men started honestly and fully informing the younger American men what the deal is with women and the legal system. We older men need to do this informing before it is too late — that is before the younger men get married, get a woman pregnant, or move in with a woman.

Note 1 – http://www.the-spearhead.com/2013/06/27/rare-execution-of-woman-carried-out-in-texas/

Note 2 – http://crossmap.christianpost.com/news/do-you-know-about-the-family-courts-and-laws-story-of-jailed-for-nonpayment-of-child-support-but-its-not-his-child-3493

Note 3 – http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005044.html

Note 4 – http://www.propublica.org/article/boys-in-custody-and-the-women-who-abuse-them

{ 76 comments… read them below or add one }

adiaforon July 5, 2013 at 14:56

The only rational way to combat the “whoops, I’m pregnant” nightmare scenario is to get snipped and tell no one about it. Always use a rubber with a new woman. If she pokes holes in it, you’re not going to be at risk for fathering a child not of your choosing.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 60 Thumb down 4
imnobody July 5, 2013 at 15:21

When I was not so well off, many women wouldn’t even give me the time of day. As I see it, American women are increasingly mercenary

Well, being an European and living in Latin America, I can say that it’s not American women. It’s every women but American women are more obvious and outspoken about it.

Like you, my luck in love has followed my luck in money. When I have been well-off, I have had lots of women after me. When I have been in a middle class situation, no woman has touched me with a six-ten pole.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 87 Thumb down 0
oddsock July 5, 2013 at 15:28

As some other poster recently mentioned; Women have become weaponized.

IMHO women have always been weaponized, they have simply had a major upgrade and for reasons highlighted by many posters on other recent threads. Women never have and never will give a flying feck about the welfare of men.

If you still don’t get it? This has been done for a reason and certainly not by feckin cultural marxist socialist liberal groups plotting the downfall of the west. These groups are no more than useful idiots of the elite or the PTB. Hoping that by somehow voting in a right wing government ( In any feckin western country ) is going to rectify things is simply pissing in the wind.

It is not only sad but quite pathetic to see a few men on here still clutching at straws with the never ending mantra of ” its all the lefts fault” “Conservatives Republicans Libertarians will reduce the size of government bollocks bollocks ” “reduce spending bollocks ” “Cut taxes bollocks”

My big fat hairy feckin arse they will. Dream on !

Excellent post Joe.

MGTOW is the only sane choice. ( Men with no nads need not apply )

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 77 Thumb down 18
Ode July 5, 2013 at 16:17

When I was not so well off, many women wouldn’t even give me the time of day. As I see it, American women are increasingly mercenary, or perhaps just significantly more willing to show their long-standing gold-digger inclinations.

All my life I was a beta male. I was a nerd who was shy around women. However something would happen in my life that would forever change my personality, it would forever eliminate my shyness. I went through this phase in my life when things were going pretty bad. I was working as a security guard making $12 per hour. A lot of my home cooked meals involved pasta or potatoes because on a cost per pound basis it was hard to find anything cheaper. When I got sick of eating that I would get a burger at a fast food place. That was my idea of of treating myself.
I don’t remember any woman finding me hot and sexy back then.

Fast forward to the present, through a combination of hard work and persistence, I’m doing much better now. While I don’t make enough money to live in a big house I do make enough to get some attention from women these days, a smile here and there. I return the gesture with a polite nod, but the shy beta male in me has been replaced by a beta male who doesn’t give a sh!t anymore. Even if I win the lottery tomorrow and could have any woman I wanted, I have already made up my mind. No LTR, no exceptions.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 113 Thumb down 2
Zorro July 5, 2013 at 17:12

Another great post but unless we teach our sons these facts (not all men and women are this way but it’s typical for many men to find women this way) our sons don’t learn these things well enough or soon enough.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 57 Thumb down 0
Michael July 5, 2013 at 17:14

Joe, it does not need to disgust you, that women covet your things. Does a magpie coveting your shiny things disgust you? Does fox coveting your chickens disgust you? Does a wasp coveting leftover jam on your kitchen table disgust you? It is not the women’s fault that their nature is materialistic, and not all of them can be raised to be human*. Society has failed and therefore women fail (as do men, who are raised as sissy-boy manginae)

(*) By ‘human’ I mean the metaphysical meaning of it, the ‘civilized man’.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 42 Thumb down 18
The Other Jim July 5, 2013 at 17:18

To even consider a woman for marriage and motherhood one has to find a woman who is self-aware of female nature and culturally at odds with Modernity as defined by Feminism, Sex-Positivism, etc. Something akin to finding a needle in a haystack.

On occasion I meet women who might have made good wives and mothers but all too often they’re just completely unaware of the concept. All too often, they’ve bought into the Feminist-Helen Gurley Brown lie that ‘they can have it all’ on their schedule, eg pursue a career, live the ‘Sex & the City’ lifestyle, and then magically at age 30, their ‘Mr. Big’ will show up, with his high six-figure salary, marry them, whisk them away to the Hamptons whilst keeping a brownstone in the city with their 2.3 children.

Sans economic collapse in some form, I don’t see things changing.

Women and particularly young women are not willing to give up on feminism and certainly not willing to give up the material and legal goodies it brought them. Smarter, older, traditional women foreseeing economic hardships or what not won’t manage to change their opinions.

The only advice one can give is not to get married, and/or expat if possible.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 81 Thumb down 0
shiva1008 July 5, 2013 at 17:27

> If you still don’t get it? This has been done for a reason and certainly not by feckin cultural marxist socialist liberal groups plotting the downfall of the west. These groups are no more than useful idiots of the elite or the PTB. Hoping that by somehow voting in a right wing government ( In any feckin western country ) is going to rectify things is simply pissing in the wind.

This has nothing to do with the post. It’s just the same rant you post every single time you post on here. Quit hijacking threads with the same fucking rant in every thread.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 28 Thumb down 35
El Bastardo July 5, 2013 at 17:40

God Speed. I hope this article reaches to every corner of the earth!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 0
continent July 5, 2013 at 18:14

@Joe Zamboni, your quote
“Divorce-related child custody disputes provide another example. Women can, and in many cases actually do, falsely accuse the men of abusing their own children. ”
Incredible as this sound, years ago we met a woman who casually mentioned that she had told her police office husband that if he don’t agree to a divorce, she will accuse him abusing their cildren.
Some years later a police office with same surname reportedly died of a heart atttack after visiting a family murder -suicide site of a police officer.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 0
tiredofitall July 5, 2013 at 18:15

” I was then shocked and dismayed that so many American women had become so blatantly money-hungry, heartless, and manipulative. Now I take it for granted.”

Nope, it’s the same as it ever was, only now women aren’t shamed and reigned into behaving like actual human beings.

If they wanna ride the cock carousel and chase alphas through their 20′s, it’s encouraged. No longer is it a goal to find a mate and settle down. And having kids while young is laughably out of fashion to them.

They’d rather while away their youth on badboys and assholes, only to settle in their late 30′s and hopefully get their “early retirement” on the back of some loser beta she’d never have given a second look back when her SMP value was much higher, and her cock-count was much lower.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 75 Thumb down 1
Jensen July 5, 2013 at 18:20

I teach my teenage son:

No marriage.
No cohabitation.
No joint property.

Kids? Not to be considered until he is 45, cashed up and independent. He will then know himself and the world better, and can decide if he wants a kid or kids, and where. I advise that he will probably be better off in a faraway place, like Myanmar or something.

In the meantime, he is to build his body, preserve his health for the long run, educate himself in reality, and work and save for himself.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 92 Thumb down 3
Gilgamesh July 5, 2013 at 18:30

Not trying out anything on roost or roissy’s blogs until I get that vasectomy. That might not be until I’m 32 but oh well….

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 0
joeb July 5, 2013 at 19:17

Words that stuck in my head , She thinks everything you own is hers she just has to figure out how to get it .
Should have listened . I have a mgtow son now I’m so proud .

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 69 Thumb down 0
GraniteSoldier July 5, 2013 at 19:52

Great post. The Army recruiter that recruited me shared with me that he got snipped and the Army was happy to pay for it. You think I would have taken a lesson from that?

Nope. I made it until late 30s without falling for the trap. I appreciate it now.

Get snipped young boys it’s the only realistic way to prevent becoming a slave.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 3
oddsock July 5, 2013 at 21:19

shiva1008

MGTOW is the only sane choice. ( Men with no nads need not apply )

Lets see how far you can spit your dummy out this time ? Lol.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 19 Thumb down 9
Attila July 5, 2013 at 22:37

They are always looking to get something from you – it’s that simple. Emotional or financial capital, period. I’ve told a few of them that I no longer wanted to associate with them – (dumped)- and the look of stunned disbelief was interesting to observe. And these weren’t even girlfriends or anything close.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 56 Thumb down 0
Attila July 5, 2013 at 22:41

If it’s in woman’s nature to be the way she is – then I can say that is in man’s nature to despise the way the operate. Just because it’s in the nature of crows to pluck out your eyes doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to kill one coming straight at you!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 0
Oswald Spengler July 5, 2013 at 23:08

I guess I’ll just stick to escorts. At least they’re honest about the sex being primarily about the money.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 52 Thumb down 1
Skeptic July 6, 2013 at 00:09

I know I’m repeating myself here…………….
However the Male Contraceptive Pill is going to have an almighty positive effect on freeing men up from their current reproductive hostage.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 1
ContrarianExpatriate July 6, 2013 at 01:04

If you want to know just how true this article is, you have to look no further than this link:

http://www.abqjournal.com/main/199956/abqnewsseeker/girl-arrested-in-santa-fe-for-extortion.html

Squeezing men for money after sex is real. You have been warned.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 0
DCM July 6, 2013 at 02:43

“Michael July 5, 2013 at 17:14

Joe, it does not need to disgust you, that women covet your things. Does a magpie coveting your shiny things disgust you? Does fox coveting your chickens disgust you? Does a wasp coveting leftover jam on your kitchen table disgust you? It is not the women’s fault that their nature is materialistic, and not all of them can be raised to be human*. Society has failed and therefore women fail (as do men, who are raised as sissy-boy manginae)

(*) By ‘human’ I mean the metaphysical meaning of it, the ‘civilized man’.”

I understand the rhetorical value of this approach but it doesn’t help the overall situation any more than does females being to flip back and forth between so-called traditional and modern roles.
Since feminists have shrieked for decades that females are morally and intellectually superior all females should be held to that standard that so few of them have rejected. Everything they do must be treated as a deliberate, conscious, purposeful, chosen behavior and they must be held responsible for the choice and its outcome — they must have intended the outcome since they’re so smart — whatever the outcome.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 0
DW3 July 6, 2013 at 03:08

This article is a towering 500 foot home run, the only movement from the fielders is a turning of the neck to watch the ball sail a hundred feet above there heads. Awesome!

I’m already trapped in an ironclad extortion racket for probably at least another 15 years, so it does me zero good to talk tough about making wise choices. I get as much satisfaction as I can from what fathering I’m permitted to perform. I dedicate myself to being the very best dad I can be, and try to give back as much as I can to men who are worse off than I am.

You can be 100% sure that at this point, I wouldn’t partner up with a woman who wasn’t a mute multi-millionaire, with enormous real breasts and a tight body who gave me a duffel bag of untraceable cash and a brick of 24K gold as a surety. I’d also insist on her using a big chunk of her resources to make my baby mamas miserable. And I sure wouldn’t have any more kids.

Misogynist? Hell yeah, with reason.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 58 Thumb down 0
oddsock July 6, 2013 at 04:07

Dave Foleys Divorce

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaC-2lj6HNg

Have a good listen to this, especially you young guys.

Still want to get married ? Your cupcake is not like that ?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 0
freebird July 6, 2013 at 04:42

Attention Christian game cultists

The Christian God says that man is the head of the family and his wife and children are his property.

The law says the woman and her children are the head of the family and all are property of The State.

Yet the Christian game cultists lie and say a man can be alpha enough to be husband and control the wife.

They lead men to destruction by these lies,under The Law,all these would be ‘alphas’ are,and always will be,
“Her little bitch.”

Learn game,they cry,do the seduction work,enslave yourself,ignore logic,truth,theology,and justice.

Deceiving,ensnaring,false teaching,seduction,supporting harlotry,enslaving men,supporting the destruction of families,all PURE signs of anti-Christic behavior.

Address the injustices in the law,return to biblical law,or boycott until enough pain is felt -when eventually the women will be FORCED to consider a husbands rightful station,and take action to reverse the law,or create a system separate from the law that has teeth in the penalties for adultery,divorce,and child-theft.

Xians talk bad about Muslims,but under sharia law,the women are far happier,because they are owned,and thus cared for.

If I own a car I will care for it,a rental,drive it like a manic and send it back to the rental station broken.

Since when did The State go into the business of owning human beings?

Around 1974.

Feminism freed women to commit fraud,they are loath to even consider relinquishing this power.

Man-up,they yelp,and yelp.

Act right!

I say woman-up,and learn to use logic and foresight,rather than the transient pleasures of the moment.

It is true,even the most enlightened women refuses to consider one iota of men’s long term welfare.

http://www.happybachelorsforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=17400

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 7
Anonymous July 6, 2013 at 05:30

Zorro: “Another great post but unless we teach our sons these facts (not all men and women are this way but it’s typical for many men to find women this way)… ”

Unfortunately, ALL women CAN be this way– be advised and wary.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 0
BC July 6, 2013 at 07:54

Yet more proof that dating, courtship, marriage, and divorce in America today, in many cases, is legalized prostitution.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 0
Jack July 6, 2013 at 08:20

To be seen by women as super-attractive and desirable just because I have significant financial resources disgusts me.

That doesn’t disgust me at all. Quite the reverse. If women only went by looks, young handsome men would get all the women and what kind of justice would that be? Tell me, where would the fairness be in a man being surrounded by hundreds of nubile beauties just because he was born with the right facial features and more mg/L of testosterone?

At least a man who has managed to accumulate some wealth has some merit in having done so, and that’s why we should resist feminist extortion.

P.S. Likewise I look upon legal and affordable prostitution, not as another disgusting thing, but as a great social and existential equalizer. It gives beta males the opportunity of getting near women normally reserved for alphas.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 9
Charles Martel July 6, 2013 at 08:28

We older men need to do this informing before it is too late — that is before the younger men get married, get a woman pregnant, or move in with a woman.

There’s only so much you can do. A distant male relative is getting married in about six months. He’s a mangina but has the potential to become a man – he’s an outstanding downhill skier for example – yet he has been completely indoctrinated in the feminist culture and plays the role of “wife” to his girlfriend. His married life is going to totally, completely suck. I’d like to intervene yet know if I try the family consequences would likely be epic. Worst of it is, the young man himself would probably be the first to denounce me to the feminist Stasi.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 0
Schopenhauer July 6, 2013 at 08:35

If you want to remain optimistic about potential improvement for the status of men in today’s world, maybe it is best not to read history. Even Aristotle, the greatest philosopher, failed a woman’s shit test.

Phyllis was the wife of Alexander the Great, who was a student and disciple of Aristotle. Alexander was instructed by Aristotle to avoid sexual relations with his wife because it distracted from more important things, such as empire building. Phyllis felt spurned and, like most women, she had the loyalty of an alley cat.

Phyllis decided to get revenge on Alexander by seducing the old philosopher who had pushed her husband away. Aristotle was an easy mark. He thought he was the seducer in trying to get her in bed. She would give the philosopher what he wanted, but only as his dominatrix. She demanded to ride on his back, with the old philosopher down on his hands and knees like a horse.

Phyllis told Aristotle:

“This I will certainly not do, unless I see a sign of love, lest you be testing me. Therefore, come to my chamber crawling on hand and foot, in order to carry me like a horse. Then I’ll know that you aren’t deluding me.”

I’m certain “shit test” would sound better in ancient Greek, but that’s what it was.

This legend became popular in Europe during the Middle Ages and it was the subject of much art in various versions of Phyllis riding Aristotle as he crawled on all fours. Here is one example at the Metropolitan Museum of Art:

http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/works-of-art/1975.1.1416

I could be wrong about this, but I believe it was Aristotle who wrote that men could not think clearly until age 60 when the sex drive diminished. He died at 61.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 1
Shinzaemon July 6, 2013 at 10:08

Finding a Modern Woman worthy of marriage and children is like looking for a needle in a haystack on a moonless night while wearing a blindfold!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 0
Aharon July 6, 2013 at 10:39

oddsock wrote: “MGTOW is the only sane choice.”

I agree 100% that MGTOW is the only sane choice. IMO, the current traditionalists are almost the same degree of anti-male oppression and manipulation as the progressives.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 1
keyster July 6, 2013 at 10:43

This is just yet more manospheric deprogramming of the Equality Myth that’s been pounded into our heads for three generations…that men and women are exactly alike; have the same exact instinctual biological imperatives, limited only by biology itself.

News Flash: Women have a whole other agenda going when it comes to long-term mate selection. “Does he seem like a dependable provider? Will I have to be relied on at some point to support our family?” You’re being judged for this from the very beginning. It’s usually very rational.

Of course they can be conniving and cunning. Feeling betrayed by all the propaganda yet? “We’re supposed to be co-equal partners!” No you’re not. She’s advantaged. It’s what she get’s in return for allowing vaginal access and the temporary service of her uterus to gestate your progeny. You’re “lucky” she chose you to be her husband.

The “social construct of gender roles” would want us to believe husband and wife are interchangeable, like you might imagine a gay marriage. Men who bought into the Equality Myth think they owe it to their wives to be compliant subserviant milquetoast. Men have shit tests too. Can she survive the “bitch test”? Will you allow her to be a bitch, or knock that shit off before it becomes a habit?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 3
zimmy July 6, 2013 at 11:01

Womens absolute social, cultural and legal powers corrupt them absolutely.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 0
Mr. J July 6, 2013 at 11:44

“WANTED: Man with house, send picture of house”

“WANTED: Woman with truck, send picture of truck”

“She’s a good housekeeper..Married twice and kept both houses.”

…..These are old jokes
..

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 1
oddsock July 6, 2013 at 12:13

Aharon oddsock wrote:

“MGTOW is the only sane choice.”

I agree 100% that MGTOW is the only sane choice. IMO, the current traditionalists are almost the same degree of anti-male oppression and manipulation as the progressives.”

Correct but sadly, for many, it is probably the most bitter part of the red pill to swallow. Its like watching them standing on the deck of the Titanic with the waves lapping around their ankles while they scream ever louder, its only a leak. Women and children first!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 1
Ted Williams July 6, 2013 at 12:35

Joe Zamboni, it would be interesting to read an article by you on how you made your money. It could be woven into the fabric of another article speaking about how you were able to keep your mind off the women and concentrate on the actual making of money. Many men who probably were destined to riches were waylaid by their constant search for pussy. I am sure you could write an interesting article about how you yourself kept yourself focused.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
AdVader July 6, 2013 at 13:44

children&fathers robbed from fatherhood and normal familylife, unabled&obstructed in fullworthy development of human well being, figuring as objects in an insane sic&selfish fembot theater, fatherless/defathered children are being discriminated, fathers are being treated unequal, the torture never stops, children&fathers suffer and are harmed&damaged4life in their being, fatherless-defathered households are no families and children&fathers as broken&incomplete, divorce is child abuse, the divorcing parent is unfit, femini$$m is a sickening&maddening pseudological lie, a severe mindillness, the making of antisocial destructive sociopaths!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
djc July 6, 2013 at 14:15

keyster July 6, 2013 at 10:43

This is just yet more manospheric deprogramming of the Equality Myth that’s been pounded into our heads for three generations…that men and women are exactly alike; have the same exact instinctual biological imperatives, limited only by biology itself.

News Flash: Women have a whole other agenda going when it comes to long-term mate selection. “Does he seem like a dependable provider? Will I have to be relied on at some point to support our family?” You’re being judged for this from the very beginning. It’s usually very rational.

Of course they can be conniving and cunning. Feeling betrayed by all the propaganda yet? “We’re supposed to be co-equal partners!” No you’re not. She’s advantaged. It’s what she get’s in return for allowing vaginal access and the temporary service of her uterus to gestate your progeny. You’re “lucky” she chose you to be her husband.

The “social construct of gender roles” would want us to believe husband and wife are interchangeable, like you might imagine a gay marriage. Men who bought into the Equality Myth think they owe it to their wives to be compliant subserviant milquetoast. Men have shit tests too. Can she survive the “bitch test”? Will you allow her to be a bitch, or knock that shit off before it becomes a habit?

This explains it all quite well.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer July 6, 2013 at 15:32

Whatta we got here?

Professional Victim? Check

White Feminist “Anti-Racist” Webzine? Check

Gullible Media? Check

Actual White Racists? You decide :

Salon Turning to Hate Crime Hoaxing In Wake of Zimmerman Prosecution Debacle?

In your comments, please refer to her as “Dr. Cooper”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
Digger July 6, 2013 at 18:10

Excellent posting. No doubt any female or mangina, stumbling onto this site, article and comments would be jolted by the inflammatory rhetoric (justified). But there is nothing in these ideas that shouldn’t be contested in the MSM – for a healthy culture. But that says it all about the current state of Western civilization.

My experience is that women are instinctively drawn more to ‘property’ than to ‘money’ or ‘cars’. Say you have just bought any old townhouse and their eyes light up like lanterns.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 0
Anonymous July 6, 2013 at 18:29

@Jensen

Er, make sure to tell your teen son to get his sperm frozen while in his twenties. Our sperm degrades the older we get, and older men (30+) are more likely to have children with mental issues, such as autism (regardless of how young or old the mother is).

Also, kids at 45? I had an older father. Hated it; he died when I was just 22, but was helping out due to his failing health for years.
35 is a good age, not to old, but not too young either. Plenty of time to secure a decent income and explore.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 19
Jaego July 6, 2013 at 20:08

It’s an ugly world: women are sex objects and men are success objects. If a man wants to marry for love, he better pretend to be a pauper as the old ballad The Gypsy Rover indicates. And a Woman could perhaps deface herself with makeup or some kind of plastic surgery. Very few men would be interested in an ugly women or women in a poor man.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 3
Nemo July 6, 2013 at 20:11

The increase in autism from an older man fathering children is tiny compared to the increase in other disorders from older mothers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paternal_age_effect

The increase is not statistically significant for some studies, and where an effect is found the increased probability of autism is generally given as between 20-40% for older fathers.

Compare that with this data:

“A woman’s risk of having a baby with chromosomal abnormalities increases with her age. Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal birth defect, and a woman’s risk of having a baby with Down syndrome is:

At age 25, 1 in 1,250
At age 30, 1 in 1,000
At age 35, 1 in 400
At age 40, 1 in 100
At age 45, 1 in 30
At age 49, 1 in 10 ”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maternal_age_effect

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire July 6, 2013 at 21:21

I remember sitting in a restaurant at the Atlanta Airport, waiting for my connecting flight, and overhearing three middle-aged women talking at the next table. They made no effort to prevent those nearby from hearing them. They were all divorcees, and they were comparing how much loot they had extracted from their ex-husbands, as though it was a competition. They squealed with glee about the significant resources that they had gotten from their former mates.
_________________
have you considered taping those kinds of conversations and posting them for the manosphere?

few things would wake more men up than to hear stuff like this straight from the horses mouth

as they were in a public place and “made no effort to prevent those nearby from hearing them” it should be pretty hard for a lawyer to make the argument that they had an ‘expectation of privacy’ in case they tried to take legal action for the posting

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
orecret July 6, 2013 at 21:55

MGTOW is most effective when, in addition to dissassociating yourself with women in the personal sphere, you also de-institutionalize any and all relations with women in any sphere, to the point where they have have no legal redress to come after you, your property, your reputation, your children, your dignity, etc. Marriage, work, armed services, church, boy scouts, men’s clubs, etc.

MGTOW is most effective when self-employed, without female employees nor co-owners, and preferably without female clients of any sort.

MGTOW means leaving the herd and forging your own way as a stag deer would. This means no time and energy wasted showering resources on a genetic dead-end as is the modern, “liberated” woman.

MGTOW is most effective when you de-institutionalize the man.

Modern society is for women. Some say Ancient Rome fell because it was overly-feminized.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 1
crypter27 July 6, 2013 at 22:05

You hit the nail on the head,western women are small time hoods who get a cut get of the extorted money the family courts are the mafia cartels who get most. Of the money!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 0
Jack July 7, 2013 at 01:43

Many men who probably were destined to riches were waylaid by their constant search for pussy.

Too true, alas!

Wasting your money on procuring pussy, as fast as you earn it, instead of making wise investments. It pretty much describes what I’ve done with my life.

On the other hand there are many things you can only do when young, like wild partying. It’s a trade-off.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 0
geographybeefinalisthimself July 7, 2013 at 05:18

“No doubt any female or mangina, stumbling onto this site, article and comments would be jolted by the inflammatory rhetoric (justified).”

It’s only “inflammatory” because it is completely true.

For feminists and manginas the truth would hurt about as much as a gunshot wound, an eyeball gouging, or an amputation would hurt any one of us, and neither group will let the truth hurt for as long as it takes for them to figure out what they’ve done to real men.

Feminists and manginas think that everyone else owes it to them to like them. Last I checked, no one person is going to be liked by everyone else, and everyone is going to dislike at least one other person. It isn’t owed to anyone to be liked by everyone else either.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
Rus July 7, 2013 at 07:50

Getting snipped is not a solution. You are still stuck right where you are. The only real solution is escape. Get out of the country, move somewhere with sane laws. Somewhere far, far away.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 1
orecret July 7, 2013 at 12:11

“Somewhere far, far away.” – Rus

Sounds like paradise…

Is this a real place? I wonder…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Kingsley Davis July 7, 2013 at 12:34

“Ted Williams
Joe Zamboni, it would be interesting to read an article by you on how you made your money. It could be woven into the fabric of another article speaking about how you were able to keep your mind off the women and concentrate on the actual making of money. Many men who probably were destined to riches were waylaid by their constant search for pussy. I am sure you could write an interesting article about how you yourself kept yourself focused.”

Yea Joe, wha do you know?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
MelvinBelli July 7, 2013 at 19:25

‘Mr. Big’ will show up, with his high six-figure salary

If I remember correctly Mr Big wasn’t just some guy earning a good salary, he was very rich. Now, can you really imagine some decent looking guy who is very wealthy going for some butterface who is pushing 40?
This whole thing is just some female’s masturbatory fantasy.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 1
MelvinBelli July 7, 2013 at 20:28

Our sperm degrades the older we get, and older men (30+) are more likely to have children with mental issues

There is no proof of this. In fact, older men who have kids have more intelligent kids and there is proof for this. Perhaps it may be that he’s older and more experienced and is better at rearing them but whatever the reason is it shows that degraded sperm due to age is not true.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4
jack July 8, 2013 at 01:31

Even if it were true, degraded sperm may not reach the uterus in the first place. And since there’s so much of them it doesn’t matter if in older men 20% is degraded (instead of say only 2%). The 80% that would remain are plenty. This is a case where male disposibility is an advantage.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Darryl X July 8, 2013 at 06:40

OT but this post is relevant to recent articles at The-Spearhead and I am preparing this letter for our administration.

“Men face unique health challenges, and one of the most dangerous may be their reluctance to seek health care. Men’s Health Month exists to alert, inspire, and educate men to realize that most important thing they can do is take responsibility for themselves so they can be there to care for those they love.” (JUNE IS MEN’S HEALTH MONTH 14 June 2013)

Thank you for acknowledging the importance of men’s health. I am taking this opportunity to advise you about the truth of men’s health in the United States.

The most dangerous challenge confronting men and their health is NOT reluctance to seek care. Concluding that poor health reflects a choice of men is not supported by any data. In fact, overwhelming volumes of data and objective analysis of them show conclusively that all challenges with which men are confronted result from their preclusion actively and deliberately from our systems of health care and indeed from any benefits of living or participating in society at all. Preclusion of men from access to health care is achieved by governments and special interest groups for profit and political expedience.

The obstacles to pursuit of good health for men begins before they are born and ends at their untimely, early and unnecessary deaths.

Despite overwhelming volumes of medical research which shows conclusively that circumcision does not contribute to better health for men, does not prevent the transmission of diseases and may even encourage it, is painful

For a variety of reasons, some obvious and some not so obvious, education is correlated directly with good health. Men are precluded however from our systems of education K-12 and higher. For instance, the rate of graduation for boys from high school has declined precipitously during the past forty-five years and today the ratio of men and women at universities approximates 2:3. The actual ratio of 43:57 is cited most frequently but it is not adjusted for tenures, curricula and other variables. When those variables are considered, the ratio is actually much lower and closer to 2:3.

Ten-percent of children in public schools are prescribed drugs like methylphenidate for diagnoses like ADHD. More than two-thirds of those are boys. Because of lobbying by pharmaceutical companies, the federal government subsidizes states to pay public schools and teachers for referral of children (mostly boys) to mental health professionals, (mis)diagnoses and unnecessary prescriptions for drugs which will do more harm to them than good.

Title-IX denies all men on college campuses (academics, administrators, professionals and students alike) right to due process when accused falsely of crimes of a sexual nature. And the way crimes of a sexual nature is defined under federal, state and local laws (like VAWA), crimes of a sexual nature can be anything a woman wants it to be. See letter by John McCain (US Senator, R – Ariz) to Eric Holder (Attorney General of the US) week of 24 June 2013 about this disturbing development. There are many official and unofficial sources for information about the denial of rights to due process for men on college campuses using Title-IX and other political, legal, social and financial mechanisms.

The great incidence and cost of divorce, the low incidence of shared parenting or legal and physical custody, the great incidence of custody by mothers, and the calculation of child support based upon imputed incomes and educations makes an education for men of no value. Not only is an education for men of no value, it is actually punished and men have no incentive for pursuing an education.

During the past forty-five years, one half of all fathers in the US have been alienated from their children. More than twenty-five million fathers from more than forty-million children. Approximately half of these children and their fathers never see each other again after fathers have been denied custody and relationship of the other half is condemned to a few days a month and an occasional holiday which is not a healthy or even meaningful parent-child relationship (that’s about one-quarter each for a total of half). Relationship with parents (particularly fathers) is correlated positively with good health for a variety of reasons, some obvious and some not so obvious. Data concerning divorce, child support and fatherless children are available through the US Department of Health and Human Services and its Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement, the US Dept of the Census, The Heritage Foundation and many other official and unofficial sources.

The most comprehensive longitudinal study finished in 2010 and concluded that the most important variable predicting longevity is whether or not a subject’s parents were married (even the scientists who participated in the study were stunned by this development). Please consult The Longevity Project for more details. Fathers and Families (now the National Parents Organization) has one of many articles concerning that project here http://www.fathersandfamilies. org/2011/03/23/research-children-of-divorce-live-shorter-lives/. During the past forty-five years, half of marriages in the US have ended in divorce. Age of children at time of divorce has declined. Mothers are responsible for initiating most divorces and receive child support at expense of fathers between two and three times cost of raising the children and between four and six times what a father should be paying. Severing the relationship between children and their fathers has been correlated strongly with poor health of both fathers and their children.

During the past forty-five years, approximately seven million men have been incarcerated in prisons or jails. Presently, more than two-million are and another five-million are in the penal system. That’s more men per capita than any other country in the history of the world except for Nazi Germany during war-time and Stalinist Russia. Today, Russia incarcerates the second greatest number of men per capita which is less than two-thirds that of the US. Most men in our prisons or jails have committed no crimes but are political prisoners. Data concerning the incarcaration of men in the US are available at the US Dept of Justice, Depts of Corrections and a variety of other official and unofficial sources.

More than fifty-thousand men are in prison because they are unable to comply with orders for child support. The Bradley Amendment to Title-IVD of the Social Security Act of 1996 prevents downward modification of an award for child support for any reason. Excessive child support is the most important reason for the high incidence of incarceration, poverty, suicide, poor health among men and fatherless children. The federal government subsidizes states through laws like VAWA, CAPTA, Title-IX and many others for making false allegations against men. Concerning instances of divorce, the laws are used to separate fathers forcibly from their children. After children have been separated forcibly from their fathers, courts order the fathers to pay child support. The State exchanges the child support and federal subsidies attached to it with the mothers and special interest groups for votes and absolute power.

During the past forty-five years, approximately 1.3-million men have committed suicide. Almost all of these men suffer no mental illness but have been precluded from any benefits of living in society and suicide is their only remaining option for relief of incredible suffering. The only services available to men contemplating suicide are predicated upon treatment of them for mental illness but neglects the practical circumstances imposed upon them. Of those men, more than 250,000 committed suicide in response to divorce, child support, related false allegations of domestic violence, rape and child abuse, and government imposition upon them in response to these developments. That number might be much higher but reasons for suicide are not always documented. During the past one-hundred years, the average age at which men commit suicide has declined from sixty-five to twenty-five. Incidence of suicide among women has always been approximately one-quarter of men but average age during the past one-hundred years has not declined. Data concerning suicide are easily ascertained at the Nat’l Institute for Suicide Prevention, the Nat’l Institute of Mental Health, The Hertitage Foundation and many other official and unofficial sources.

The Violence Against Women Act, Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, Title-IX and many other federal laws reward states for false allegations of rape, domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse against innocent men. Many articles about the Domestic Violence Industry are available at Fathers and Families (now the National Parents Organization) and a comprehensive and recent review of data concerning domestic violence is here https://www.nationalparentsorganization.org/blog/21025-lincoln-journal-star-picks-up-the-pask-ball-and-runs-with-it.

Forty-two researchers pored over 12,000 peer-reviewed studies for three years and published their findings in over 2,000 pages for an entire year of the journal. Twenty-eight percent of women had committed domestic violence compared with 21.6 percent of men. Twenty-three percent of women were assaulted by partners at least once in their lifetimes compared to 19 percent of men. Forty percent of women and 32 percent of men reported expressive abuse. Forty-one percent of women and 43 percent of men reported coercive abuse. Twenty-one domestic violence and sexual assault programs in Nebraska provided services during FY 2012 to 13,264 women, 1,560 men and 8,790 children/youth-undisclosed. Men comprised only 10.5 percent of the adult population served even though they comprise half or more of all adult victims. Rates of DV have come down dramatically (64%) since 1993, but so has all violent crime (73%). So it’s hard to credit the DV industry with any great success given the fact that DV has actually been reduced less than have all other violent crimes. I suppose it’s arguable that the DV industry’s approach has actually retarded improvement. One study of contested custody cases found domestic violence allegations were made in 55 percent of cases. Of those allegations, courts found 59 percent were not supported by evidence. Most of the others were not domestic violence but self defense. An analysis of domestic violence restraining orders concluded 81 percent were unnecessary or based on false allegations. This is consistent with other evidence that “between 50 and 80 percent of abuse allegations cannot be substantiated in child custody cases where a high conflict exists between the parents and there is a young child involved.”

The Innocence Project commenced in 1992 and has exonerated more than three-hundred innocent men who have spent an average of thirteen years in prison. The Project has expanded its efforts to include not just DNA evidence of a man’s innocence but men who have been convicted and imprisoned without any evidence that a crime has even been committed. That most men in US prisons or jails are innocent of any wrong-doing has been estimated.

In 2012, Congressional appropriations for women’s health exceeded men’s health by a multiple of fifteen (yes, that’s 15). Similar disparities between appropriations for men’s and women’s health are similar for most of the past twenty years. In 2012, average longevity of women exceeded men by almost seven years. There was no difference forty-five years ago or even one-hundred. In fact, not only has longevity of men failed to keep pace with women but in recent years it has actually declined according to some studies.

Because so many men have been imprisoned unlawfully, denied educations, killed or driven to suicide, condemned to poverty and homelessness, expelled and driven from their families, and denied passports to escape their persecutors, women represent a growing majority of the population and electorate.

Portraying the crisis of poor health among men as a choice given the extraordinarily misandrous laws and policies and the obvious and dire circumstances of men which actively preclude them from access to health care and healthy lifestyles is irresponsible and a disservice to men, the United States and civilization.

Please contact me with any questions.

The Men’s Human Rights Movement (MRM) began more than five years ago, is the largest civil rights movement in the history of the world and promotes truth about divorce, child support, parental alienation, domestic violence, rape, unlawful imprisonment, income disparities, and disparities concerning access health care.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Darryl X July 8, 2013 at 11:33

@ Jack – A “wise investment” used to be an education, employemtn and a family. Today unfortunately, all these investments yield negative returns.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
realist July 8, 2013 at 12:06

Melvin, there is proof, although the risk is not that high if you look at the bigger picture. Most sperm banks won’t accept sperm from men older than 39, some even set the limit at 34.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 5
Alex July 8, 2013 at 23:59

I think these are all valid points you are making. There is no trust anymore and everyone thinks people are out to get them. Some women have created a name for the whole gender which I find a little unfair.
I realize that in America, people very easily sue others for one reason or another and laws which are meant to protect people are actually used against others.

I am not American however, I live in Greece. There is a whole lot of corruption everywhere, but i think its important to maintain a positive outlook of the world. I meet so many people every day (working in the tourist industry) and have realized just how genuinely nice people are. If you are going to look for all the negatives you are sure to find them. Think in a negative way and you will attract negativity. It goes both ways, if you are friendly and smile and people you make it really damn difficult for them to be rude and if they are, that is there problem – you dont need to make it yours.

Sorry I am overdoing this now.
In conclusion however, there are all kinds of people in the world. Why dont you concentrate on the ones you DO want in your life, rather than the ones you DON’T?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 11
orecret July 9, 2013 at 07:58

The Institutionalized Extortion of Heterosexual Men

Facilitated by a little known corollary of the legal code: “possession of a vagina is 9/10th’s of the law…”

To wit, any one in possession of a pussy, real or virtual, functioning or not, is entitled to any thing and any legal claim that they wish to make. Criminal code requirements for evidence need not apply. All that is required is that those in possession of a vagina, virtual or otherwise, in an institutional environment, find themselves to be “unhaaaaapy” and lodge a complaint with the proper authorites (this may or may not include the popular media). The intentions of those accused are of no consequence and will not be admissable in a court of law. What is of paramount importance is the emotional state of the accuser.

No, the fleshlight does not qualify as a virtual pussy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
Gets None July 9, 2013 at 08:14

Women want to have sex with you? Wow I feel so bad for you man :sarc

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 14
Vincent Vinturi @ Real Natural Seduction July 10, 2013 at 01:57

Hence the reason so many Western men are flocking to countries like Colombia, Costa Rica, Thailand, and others.

In these places, men can still be men for the most part, without worrying about saying or doing something that piss the wrong woman off and bring the state down upon them with furious anger.

It wasn’t until I’d spent half a year in Thailand that I realized how browbeaten I’d been in the US and how afraid I was of expressing myself with full masculinity.

It’s like you said, we have these unconscious self-preservation mechanisms and we internalize the potential threat to our resources, freedom and very lives.

To men living in the US and UK and other nanny states I say get the hell out of dodge while you still can and come to a sunnier part of the world where men can be men and women can be women and you can be a lot happier and freer.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Anonymous July 11, 2013 at 21:05

ALEX: Greece is a completely different ball game altogether. There are plenty of gold diggers there, but unlike in the U.S/Canada/Australia/U.K, it’s very difficult for them to actually extract resources from a man via legal means.

Maybe things have changed since i last lived there in the mid 00′s, but from my understanding neither a woman or a man can take assets from the other in a divorce if they acquired prior to the marriage. And the only foolproof way a woman can make a claim against a man’s assets in divorce is if he was being unfaithful, but she has to prove it, she can’t simply cry wolf. Most of those cases get thrown out of court due to insufficient evidence.

Compared to other OECD nations, including Italy, Greece is still a paradise for well off men. Men in their 40′s can marry the youngest and hottest women they can possibly get their hands on without experiencing any real penalties if it doesn’t work out.

There is just no comparison.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Jack July 13, 2013 at 02:30

I didn’t know this about Greece. Here’s an interesting American journal abstract: The radical reform of Greek family law in 1983 included the introduction of no-fault divorce. This study examines the impact of the new liberalized divorce law on the well-being of homemakers in long-duration traditional marriages. We reviewed a sample of reported judicial decisions on postdivorce maintenance and found that Greek judges render restrictive interpretations of the general standards of need, adequacy, and sufficiency. We conclude that judges have failed to compensate full-time homemakers for their nonpecuniary contributions, and we propose a reliance-based alimony model that judges can use to protect financially weaker spouses upon divorce.

Let’s hope Greek judges will go on failing “to compensate full-time homemakers for their nonpecuniary contributions” (in plain english: to compensate full-time gold-diggers for giving some access to their vaginas).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
kuis July 13, 2013 at 18:41

Alimony is poorly enforced in Greece. and the payments are much lower than they are in the U.S.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Sam July 16, 2013 at 15:30

Excellent article!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Paul July 18, 2013 at 17:39

European women aren’t that different from the American ones. They’re just thin and their looks last a little longer which allows them to trick men a bit more often and longer than American women can.

I’ve lost count on how many women I’ve met who spent their teens and 20′s going from Alpha Thug to PUA and then expecting some guy who happens to be a decent human being to pay up. What really amazes me is how women expect – no, demand – the men target for marriage to wait x amount of weeks or months for a minimum of affection whereas the bad boy gets everything without any effort.

WHEN she’s young, relatively attractive, fertile and free of stds. Heck, getting into a relationship with a woman in her 20′s is like paying audi price for a beat-up van.

Don’t get me started on the Asians. I’ve know this cute little thing from South Korea who was raised here, but with traditional Korean values. She married her first boyfriend and while she was married she would cheat on the guy. She wasn’t interested in having kids. Said she was too long. Turns out she gave up on a great job and followed some guy into another Country and she’s already 4 months pregnant.

You can’t make this stuff up, not even Robert. H. Heinlein was this gifted, lol.

I do not hate women but I find no pleasure in their company. Even when I was in college and it happened to be a college popular with foreign women(meaning, we had tons and tons of very attractive and young women from Germany/italy/france/korea etc) seeing so many women on a daily basis would put me off.

I also remember how the very vast majority of them would all be open to the Alpha male’s advances. That really opened my eyes to how women really are. Nowadays I have no females in my friends circle. I do not interact with women if I don’t have to, and if I have to interact with them I treat them as coldly as possible.

When I have to go shopping and I’m faced with the vagina-bait stores love to put in front of them(female ”employees”) I pretend to be deaf. I always make sure my eyes don’t give women the idea that I’m looking at them. I have to say that life has been far better since I’ve dropped every woman from my life. I’m only in my late 20′s but my sex drive has been taking a major fall, so I’m pretty satisfied with life right now.

What’s best in all of this is that I don’t really see the point of interacting with women. I mean, if sex is all they have to offer: why do the Alpha males dump them as soon as they pump them? They aren’t even good at sex, anyway.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Paul July 18, 2013 at 17:41

”Alimony is poorly enforced in Greece. and the payments are much lower than they are in the U.S.”

Yeah, but they have much less money than American men and the TROIKA and IFM is making sure Greece won’t last 5 more years as a nation. I suspect the only salvation for the Greece population is to leave their Country in mass.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Paul July 18, 2013 at 17:47

Alex July 8, 2013 at 23:59

Bro, I’m not denying your point of view, but the thing is that its not only some women who make all women look bad. The vast majority of women, regardless of their religion, race or creed are highly hypergamous. They’re biologically wired to seek out the Alpha males during their most fertile decades 15-30 and to shag them up as often as possible.

Why are there so many white knights? Because vagina is so rare for the average men. Most men spend their lives without sex and without any female attention.

To women, you’re either a tall, good-looking Alpha male or you are a repulsive, disgusting, creepy average-looking/sized man, who is only good to be the bank account when she decides her eggs are rotten and she wants to pop out a kid or two(she also guarantees her retirement by getting ‘em alimony and child-support.)

You can even try to find a decent woman amongst the ugly and obese women. You won’t find any. Alpha males will sleep with any woman when they’re horny, seen it, women so obese they couldn’t stand up being asked for sex by very attractive men. How’s a guy to compete with the top 20% when women associate their value as human beings with how attractive the men they sleep with are?

And even the good ones turn sore. Nah, just not worth. We should teach your brothers and cousins and what not to avoid and ignore women. It does not matter if a woman is in need of help. Several times I’ve been in need of help, serious need of help and not only did the police not do anything about it(I’m just a young white man, not a precious woman) the women who were near me asked the guys on a date!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Laur July 31, 2013 at 10:44

It is time…you said at the end…

Well, time is to organize, to get out in action, civil movements/manifestations against a system made by men against men.
It’s not women to empower women but is men in power, those men untouched by the system, that invented it.
When we all say feminism we implicit think about women, but the dangerous person is the men in power.
It is necessary a political movement to change this.

Funny is that I saw recently how strong the governments are struggling for homosexual marriages to be imposed.
In the same vision those marriages will be used by state to extort from homosexual partner the richness.
As homosexuals are increasing as number and many men do not marry anymore the market for these institutions became slow…nice vision.

After all I read here there is only one conclusion.
A political movement must be in place.
It will be hard because no woman will accept the lose of power in what we call “patriarchy”.

I am disgusted with all those mothers that are selling their son’s future, energy, life, freedom…so disgusted.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Laur July 31, 2013 at 10:54

I remember my cousin telling me something similar in the ’90 about aviators and stewardesses (as she was one of them) how mothers were teaching young stewardesses to chase successful pilots, sleep with them and make children so to break their existing marriages and marry them after.

They do not think about the wife, the children in the marriage, they don’t think of their own children…money it’s all that matters.

Yes, many women are sick, no matter how misogynistic it sounds from a man and today’s women are even worse, despite college diplomas.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Erin pizzey July 31, 2013 at 11:41

This is one of the best and most damning indictment of the present situation. Until there is conscious effort for men to stand up and be counted backed up by good women who know that men across the world have lost their human rights nothing will change. I founded the shelter/refuge movement and I have struggled for the last forty years to get people to listen. This is one of the strongest voices I have ever heard.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Raj August 4, 2013 at 07:44

If two people fight on the street, one being female and another being male, whom should you help? If you could answer this question rightly then you will come out of your misery. Almost all women can answer this correctly. Please wake-up.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rohan September 9, 2013 at 04:19

Sexual Slavery Of Men

Humanity consists of Men & Women. But I am surprised to know as to why most of the difficult and dangerous work is assigned to men.
When humans were developed in ancient land, search for food through hunting was a dangerous activity. Even in contemporary tribal societies, it has been found that almost 90% of the men die a violent death in search of food or security. This activity was given to men, and along with this activity the possibility of death. In middle ages, the only employment available was that of a soldier. Men were employed and died. I was just thinking as to why men accepted these dangerous works to do and opted for death, whereas women lived longer in the shelter of cave or home. In ancient days marriage was sacred. It was a divine right of a woman. It was also a divine duty of a man, to marry a woman, to discharge what is called “Pitri Rrin” (father’s debt). Marriage vow was unbreakable. Due to high mortality rate of men, and longevity of women; polygamy was moral and allowed.
The situation changed. With development of science and technology, our planet becomes a safer place to live. Employment becomes available outside military also. Women opted to work outside. I am surprised to find the smartness of human females- as long as working outside was dangerous, they preferred the safety of home and the moment it becomes safer to work outside home, they decided to work outside home. Same goes with marriage- now it becomes possible for a woman to live alone, without support of a man- divorce becomes acceptable and moral. The sacred marriage becomes a personal choice.
The smartness of womenhood does not stop here. They alleged that man has exploited women for thousands of years. They were not allowed to work outside home. They were kept in bondage in marriage. And surprisingly, many men believe this argument. To correct this historical wrong they are advocating various privileges to be given to women! This article is an attempt to examine the reasons of such manipulation of man.
There is a basic dichotomy between men and women. Men want sex. It is said that men think about sex every 55 seconds. On the contrary women do not want sex. In a recent book, Why Women have Sex (Cindy Metson & David Buss), the authors say,
“Research has shown that most men find most women at least somewhat sexually attractive, whereas most women do not find most men sexually attractive at all…..”
Thus sex becomes a bargaining tool in the hand of women. Men wanted sex all the time. Women have monopoly on this demand of men. Due to this dichotomy men become a “Sexual Slaves”, i.e. they can be asked to do work which were dangerous and which women do not want to do. That is the beginning of slavery. Such manipulation of men is also evident in nature like some birds forcing males to construct a nest before they mate etc.
Cultural development perpetuated this slavery of men and monopoly of women. Sex outside marriage was seen as taboo. Sex, which is a natural activity like eating or sleeping was given a sacred place. To reduce the supply of sex, prostitution was made illegal. All these cultural developments increased men’s dependence on a single woman for sex, so that slavery of the man can be perpetuated.
In course of time a myth was created- “power of sexual desire”. In my view sexual desire is there and some power is also there behind it. But power of “food desire” or “sleep desire” is much more powerful than “sex desire”. The power of sexual desire was created artificially by reducing supply of sex, by suppressing sexual independence, by prohibiting free trade in sex etc.
The effect of sex slavery is also seen today. In today’s world men work harder, in all dangerous situation, share their earning with the women, pay large amount of taxes to state….. and live much lower than the woman. Society and state condition them to marry to perpetuate their slavery. These developments have made man a slave, a sexual slave. In the society there is nothing like power of a man, there is only slavery of a man. Men must understand their slavery. If they don’t understand it, they will be treated as slaves and abused as exploiter. They will be living in the myth of “male power” and dying early. The “myth of male power” also allow state to make anti-men laws so that slavery of men can be perpetuated through power of law.
The slavery of men is not in their chains, it is in their ignorance.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rohan September 9, 2013 at 04:20

Indian Men, Beware Of Marriage!
We are born in a society where marriage is treated as sacrosanct, something which was fixed in heaven. It is a relationship valid not only in this life but also in lives yet to come. Nevertheless, this relationship is changing and law has played a very important role in altering this relationship. The legislature drafted these laws to protect the vulnerable women in the relationship, but while doing that didn’t keep in consideration abuse of these laws by not so vulnerable women. The judiciary, while sympathizing with the tears of women, didn’t recognize the fact that these may be crocodile tears. Due to these reasons these laws has become a tool to harass husbands, extort money from husbands and their family, to torture hapless women of the husbands family. In short, these laws have made marriage more a legal relationship than a social relationship.
The law presumes, everybody knows laws. Marriage is a voluntary relationship, in the sense that till this point of time there is no law which can compel a man to marry (although in practice some women have compel men to marry them by leveling false allegation of rape against them. The recent case of suicide by an ex-Army officer is a cse in point where the man committed suicide due to pressure to marriage and in case of denial threat of false cases.). Thus every man must know the legal provisions before he enters into the legal relationship of marriage. If he enters without knowing these provisions, he cannot blame any other persons for that. However, it is the duty of legal practitioners and social workers to make tem aware of these laws so that nobody enters into a legal relationship of marriage without knowing its implications. Slowly and steadily the number of law governing the relationship between husband and wife is increasing. One thing is common in all laws- they are prejudiced and biased against the men in the sense that they give rights only to the wives and imposes duties only to the husband. Further the language of the law is such that it facilitates abuse of these laws against the husband and his family members. And in fact also the wives are systematically abusing these laws. These laws were primarily designed to protect the vulnerable women in our society but the working of these laws suggest that they have become more a weapon of harassment and extortion in the hand of not so vulnerable women. The Hindu Marriage Act and the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act impose a duty upon the husband to maintain their wife. However a person can claim maintenance only if he/she is not able to maintain himself/herself. The term is ability or potential to maintain and not mere inability to maintain at any point of time. However, a survey of the judgments will clearly shows that even when the wife was able bodies and educated then also the courts have granted maintenance. Further, these two Acts are not sufficient and the Criminal Court is empowered to grant maintenance as per section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. More Acts for the same relief means that the wife has more avenues to harass a husband through the process of Court. We can see that a wife has a right to maintenance- but what is her duty. Law says nothing. If she abuses the husband, then also she can claim maintenance. If she beats her mother-in-law, then also she can claim maintenance. Thus a wife has no duty, only rights. Just maintenance is not something to be very worried about. What is more important that the wife has been given power to send the husband and his family members to the prison at wish? Under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code a wife can complain that she has been treated with cruelty for dowry and name anybody in the relatives of the husband. What is cruelty or what is dowry, nobody knows. A gift to husband is dowry but a gift to wife is streedhan. A husband should not demand any consideration for marriage, but a girl has a right to look for a wealthy husband with a fat pay packet; it is not dowry, it is pragmatism. The law says giving dowry is as criminal as taking dowry, the wife screams that she has given dowry, but the law does not take any action against her- this is women empowerment. Under this Section octogenarian grand mom of husbands are being prosecuted for harassment- this is power of wife. Just these are not sufficient. If your wife commits suicide, invariably you will be prosecuted under Section 304B of the IPC. Here, even the prosecution has not prove many thing, Section 113A is there in the Evidence Act to presume your guilt. When men commit suicide, the law is silent. After all men can commit suicide for so many reasons- wife can commit suicide only after harassment by husband and his family. So what, the suicide statistics shows that more men commit suicide. Once any of these cases are registered against you few things are certain-like you are likely to loose your job. You will be merely suspended if you are in government service. You will spend a couple of months in jail before the bail. In jail too you will have full company of your family members. Finally, you will be granted bail and the trial begins. What will happen in trial, I don’t know. Indian Criminal Justice system is totally biased against the accused. That is why making allegation in India has become an industry. It is a tool of legal extortion in the hand of police and false accusers. Well, the purpose of this article is merely informing the worse half of the population the legal consequence of marriage and their vulnerably, if they decide to marry. Difficult to imagine-even now men marry. In any case old habits die hard. There is no solution. We are living in Rule of Law and when the law is tyrannical and prejudiced, you cannot have a solution. But, the risk can be reduced by taking recourse to written contract at the time of marriage. It is a good idea to enter into written contract at the time of marriage with your would be wife. No law prohibits such type of contract. The contract can make provisions for expenses of marriage ceremony, list of gifts received, the couple decision regarding maintenance, child custody and all other items, which the couple feels necessary to incorporate in the written contract. It may seem nauseating to introduce the idea of contract in marriage, but it is better as law has already entered into marriage. Written contract is just one mutually agreed way to reduce the rigor of falsehood in deposition before the court. It is better to catch up a lawyer before the police catch up with you.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Rohan September 9, 2013 at 04:20

Beware of marrying an Indian girl – Indians need to grow up need social education

Biased Indian laws and the extortionist attitude of empowered Indian women towards marriage should serve as a warning to men. The bitter truth is that Indian marriage reeks of bitter resentment, biased laws against the husband and extortionist wives.
HONEST, DOWN to earth, religious, very traditional these are the words that describe about 99 per cent of brides to be in matrimonial sites. These conjure an image of the Sati Savitri that the Indian women are in the eyes of any man or prospective groom. The media and the government also support this by projecting an image that the poor Indian women who are suffering from decades of male oppression need a helping hand in marriage.

Think again young men. What the media or the government does not want you to know about are highlighted below. And these are nothing but the hidden bitter truth behind most Indian marriages .The bitter truth is that the Indian marriage these days reeks of bitter resentment, biased laws against the husband and extortionist wives.

1) Twice the number of Indian married men commit suicide every year as compared to women .The suicides of men are brushed under the carpet as due to financial reasons while that of women are investigated as dowry deaths and additional funds get allocated to fight the fictional dowry menace.

2) More than 126,000 men have been arrested in the last four years alone apart from lakhs of elderly citizens, young bright men and even children in the name of dowry harassment by the Indian Police at the behest of a simple complaint.

3) A simple report is enough to put the entire family of the husband behind bars under the draconian section 498A which has been hailed as the weapon of mass destruction by the modern empowered of India.

4) The Domestic Violence Act 2005, another law considers even talking loudly with the wife an act of violence and the husband and his family can be entangled in a false case under the Domestic Violence Act. Lakhs of husbands and their elderly parents have been thrown out of their own homes under this law, by the wives so that she and her family can occupy it.

5) The extortionist police along with the judiciary are misused by the unscrupulous wife and her family to extort money and torture the families of the husband. The law provides no punishment or deterrent against misusing the senseless laws and that emboldens criminal wives even further.

6) Even if you have not accepted or demanded a single paisa as dowry you can be booked under the anti dowry law. According to the center for social research , 98 per cent of cases filed under the anti dowry law are filed with ulterior motives and are a great source of income for courts, police and lawyers and families of wives.

7) Young, highly educated and brilliant NRI boys who resist extortion efforts under section 498A have the dreaded Interpol Red Corner notices put up against their names thereby putting them in the same segment as dreaded criminals and international terrorists. This is done by the Indian police to ensure that these people when returning to India to meet their aged parents are arrested and tortured till they give in to the extortionist demands of the wives family.

8) There are no laws whatsoever to protect men in India. Indian men are considered to be the lying in all cases are not believed by the media, the government , the police or the judiciary .The Indian man cannot turn for help anywhere when he is accused falsely with a dowry harassment case or the Domestic violence Act.

Young Indian men living in India and abroad, you have worked really hard to reach where you are today and the country is proud of you for what you have achieved. Think twice before marrying these thousands of “honest, down to earth, religious, truthful “and “god-fearing” girls who are hiding in the innumerable Indian matrimonial sites. These are monsters in disguise and once they sign on the dotted line in a marriage solemnization certificate, will not think twice about misusing the biased and senseless Indian laws to destroy the lives of many a bright young Indian man.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: