Democrats have a unique opportunity not afforded to any political Party since the Republican Southern Strategy. It is well within the realm of possibility for Democrats to secure an ironclad grip on the under 30 male vote, and perhaps even the under 50 male vote as well. I am not talking about college grads, but the average everyday man. The core bedrock of the Republican Party is up for grabs and no one realizes it yet.
Do you honestly think Republican Party cares about men? Look at the VAWA, they opposed it because the re-authorization included gays, not because it didn’t have enforcement clauses to protect male victims of Domestic Violence. Republican’s also support many policies that are detrimental to young men. From foreign trade agreements, to excessive tax breaks for corporations and investors that move jobs overseas, to wanting to gut educational programs young men desperately need and Republicans harsh stance in the war on drugs. Republicans only care about the rich men and women who buy their votes, err… lobby them. They are just playing off the fact that we men by and large know that the Democrats/Feminists out and out hate us, deny our humanity and use government policy to discriminate against us. If Democrats took the initiative, they could leave the Republican Party without a base at all. All they have to do is throw feminism and feminists under the bus.
Even though this would effectively mean the end of feminism and the destruction of many feminists’ careers, it would not mean the end of women’s rights. After all, it isn’t those on the left who want a rollback, as evidenced by talking head Ann Coulter.
Actually the exact opposite would happen, women’s rights as human beings would become permanently enshrined into our society far more then they are today. There would be no risk to women’s rights because the left would run the show and conservatives would have little representation in Federal Government, and increasingly weakened presence in state, county and local Governments. So the Democratic Party wouldn’t lose all those “I am not a feminist but” gal’s, but actually gives those gal’s a way to proudly say “I am not a feminist because I support equality for men and women”. Combined with the Democratic Party’s influence in other demographics, electoral extinction of the Republican Party could be achieved within a decade or so.
Of course Democrats would have to prove their worth by actually going after feminists in order to really gain support. One mechanism is fraud. Hundreds of feminists who operate Domestic Abuse shelters are already guilty of it as the VAWA contained a clause prohibiting the discrimination against male victims of domestic violence. These shelters by refusing service to male victims of domestic violence in a very real sense defrauded the Government.
One could even take a swipe at Women’s Studies classes. How so? All those pesky feminist statistics made up or distorted for “dramatic effect” were created with taxpayer money, so again you have a lot of feminists guilty of defrauding the government. This is really just the beginning of it; if the Federal Government recognizes feminism as a hate movement, that would give Universities and Colleges the muster to expel feminist professors and students en mass.
I am sure Republicans will try massive finger blaming, Democrats can dodge that easily through a few short steps:
1) Show compassion for boys, young men and men; that is something Republicans/Conservatives are incapable of doing. From the depth of their being they cannot view boys, young men and men as human beings, rather, they view males as merely a means to an end.
2) If Republicans begin finger pointing, all Democrats have to do is own their mistakes. Say that they messed up and show how they are trying to make right what they made wrong. Then they can turn everything around and say “where the heck were you?” to the Republicans. After all, Republican presidents supported Feminists twisted version of Title IX enforcement and other insane social policies that intentionally discriminated against boy’s, young men and men. One would think that the opposition would stand against this insanity instead of using it for political gain. After all, which is worse: Falling into crazy ignorantly, or willfully allowing crazy to happen for political gain. The important thing is to make sure the message is “feminists lied to us and twisted good programs into evil ends”, and “Republicans intentionally supported it to ensure male voters would hate us instead of trying to end the insanity”. Either way, it would the negative blame onto Republicans while creating forward momentum for social programs and policies to fix the problems created by the feminist movement and other human rights inequalities.
All that together would create a very powerful message to the overwhelming majority of disadvantaged young men, and a growing segment of young women who view feminism as nothing more then a hate movement from a bygone era irrelevant to the 21st Century.
{ 37 comments… read them below or add one }
I don’t think the Democratic Party is going to throw feminazis under the bus anytime soon. If this post were to come true, I would believe it when I see it.
“Actually the exact opposite would happen, women’s rights as human beings would become permanently enshrined into our society far more then they are today.”
Then I’m against it. A one-sided war has it’s consequences.
I’ll continue to change the right where at least there’s chinks in the armor.
The left is monolithic in its Hate though. You pose away out. But they’ve read from a Marxist script too long. They are what they are. PERIOD.
Well you are right that the Republicans have a big problem (leaders that don’t represent their constituents,) but wrong about everything else.
A lot of feminism is caused or reinforced by other factors, such as the welfare state. Consider what welfare has done to the black community: a woman single mother with a part time McJob earning $29k earns more income net of taxes and wealth transfers as a black man earning $72k. (Source: Pennsylvania Sec/State). Moreover, the same woman loses many of these wealth transfers by marrying a man with a job. The result: entitled single mothers who no man is ever good enough for (the man would have to earn well more than $72k for his income to even register).
There is no way that the Democrats that just passed Obamacare will ever roll back the welfare state, and as long as there is a generous welfare state, there will be entitled single mothers voting themselves more money for less work.
Second, with over 50% of the population defendant on the welfare state (Romney’s 47% comment during the campaign), either through transfer payments, government jobs, or government sponsored/ subsidized jobs, the majority of the population is already subservient to the ruling class in Washington (who control every lobbying firm, every GSE, and every department in the bureaucracy no matter what political party is elected).
So why go after an out- group whose votes you don’t even need? Especially when the whole political system, with the exception of the filibuster in the Senate is predicated on 50%+1? Getting to 50%+1, or even less, getting a strong 40% to dominate a weak 60% allows for more power, more ability to get things done.
Rules matter. Because of how the systm is set up, the future of the Democrat party will not be to get the votes of males to ever expand until the whole country is Democrat, but, instead, to throw certain current Democrats under the bus as the most loyal/strongest constituencies get stronger.
Democrats assume (mostly correctly) that they will get enough (not necessarily majority) of the male vote in order to win elections.
When was the last time Republicans did something for heterosexual white males? I’d say in 1973, when draft was abolished. With Republicans trying to bring more unskilled immigrants while abolishing Medicare and privatizing Social Security, why would I vote for them? What’s in it for me?
Before there is a re-alignment of either wing of the Republicrat party, that will include on their platform support for mens issues and basic constitutional rights like due process and equality, the red pill will need to be consumed by many more. Someone here or at AVFM postulated that a critical mass of 10% of the population could be the catalyst required to affect real change, we are at about 3% currently was suggested
The Left’s anti-male position is not some accident, crushing the masculine spirit of independence is central to building a domineering state. You might even say that Feminism is what Leftism is in this country: the white male is the class enemy. The female voting bloc is already large and obedient, and 10s of millions of Latin Americans are being imported, so the Left’s political victory is assured. It’s really only a question of how far it dares to go.
Big gov = feminism. The repubs are in disarray, that much is true, but here is why: How can you compete against what the democrats and socialist offer? One one hand the real Republican platform is for the preservation of the Constitutional Republic and individual rights etc. However, that’s for the “opportunity” to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. Whereas the democrats, left and socialists offer this – a “guarantee” to life, liberty and happiness. Of course, the leftists don’t mention the fine print that this requires taking from Peter to pay Pauline, which limits liberties and eventually bankrupts the country. Sound familiar?
Huh. So there are still some tabs of that 70′s blotter LSD in circulation, it appears?
When you come down from your trip, try looking around with clear eyes. The D’s are rather far along in creating a race / gender based spoils system; the takers. Guess who isn’t part of it? Anyone who is a “maker”.
California shows what the D-matriarchs want. A one-party state, where all rights are group rights, and some groups only have the “right” to contribute to the common good, while all other groups get to “take”.
Suggest you read TFH’s “misandry bubble”, but only when sober / not stoned.
I’d rather see the democrats throw themselves under a bus.
Feminism is a tool of the globalists, and Democrats are the globalist’s lackeys at this point in time in the US.
It is possible that Feminism might get thrown under the bus, but not before US national sovereignty gets thrown under the bus.
There’s no left or right. There’s no reps or dems. Here’s the comment I left on the Atlantic about the great sequestration debate.
———–
Sequester. Sequester. Sequester. This is the battle you’ve all been waiting for. In tonight’s knock down, no holds bars sequestration smackdown you get front row tickets. In the battle of the century your entertainment is top priority as dems and reps square off in a head to head battle. All the old contestants will be there as well as many fresh combatants. There’s more women than ever in this years match up. More yelling. More accusations. More finger pointing. More money. More of everything you crave in the battle to be crowned sequestration king. Be there!!!
Disclaimer: The word’s sequester and sequestration are the exclusive property rights of the federal reserve. Sequester is funded in full by the federal reserve. All contestants are paid by the federal reserve. All money is lent by the federal reserve.
———-
Bread and circuses are all we have left.
The Democrats can’t give up feminism; the Democrats are the feminist worldview embodied. Shifting all responsibilities to men and all rights to women: check. Substituting the State for the man’s proper role within the family: check. Establishing a presumption of fault upon men in every sphere of life where men and women interact: check. Systematically obstructing and socially devaluing all trades whose successful performance requires masculine capabilities: check.
The one essential sacrament of the Left — the one act to which every Democrat must pay homage in order to be nominated or elected — is abortion, the act in which women get to play God with the life of another. It is not an accident.
You are all going to get thrown under the bus. Socialism only works until you run out of other peoples money. You will run out of money regardless of who is in power. The only difference is the timing. We can only guess what will happen next, but Europe will provide a good model, because it will happen there first.
I disagree with the premise that large percentage of the population wants authoritarian(socialism, fascism, etc). Most of the people who are voting for authority benefit directly from it(i. e. government bureaucrats, single baby mamas). In most elections in the USA there is way less than 50% of the population showing up at the pols to vote. The one exception in the presidential (just over 51% of the population).
However among those who benefit from authoritarian policy( gov employee’s etc) turnout is over 95%. While many who are the real blue color producers in what remains of the private economy tell me “I am going to teach the government, or the cops, etc a lesson by NOT voting” Then you ask me while socialists win most elections.
If someone was sneaking poison into chocolate chip cookies and people get sick, it is foolish to talk about how “chocolate chip cookies are bad for you” while ignoring the poison that was added to them.
I can’t see it SL. Why would the left sacrifice its majority female vote for more of a minority male vote?
Neither party is going to promote men’s rights or equality for men. We are beasts of burden fit for fighting their wars, working in sewers, and mowing their lawns.
It’s unlikely that the under 30 male demographic is sufficiently actualized for it to be worth either party’s while to support men’s rights let alone champion it.
If this was a viable and lucrative demographic one of the parties would have sought after it. Even Libertarians are mum and I think they have the most in common with MHRM and the needs of men.
I believe that the US will continue to disenfranchise and devalue men at all levels of society until the middle class is gone and the working class can no longer support the bloated military, social security, and gyno-centric entitlements.
At that point the government will collapse and anarchy will ensue just like in Greece. Only the US has guns. Lots of guns. And lots and lots of pissed off young men looking for a reason why everything is f’d up.
If we could get a million men to march on Washington to protest for men’s human rights then maybe things would be different. Until that happens we’ll just have to keep typing away on the Internet.
I can’t believe people are still fooling themselves into thinking that there is a solution. No solution. The parties are not going to save you. Each of us must save himself. It is what men have always done.
I’m not sure what to think about this post?
On the one hand, I see your point as we are like a derelict ship drifting on an ocean that does not care if we sink or get grounded on a foreign shore. At some point; someone may try to swipe at us.
Yet, I think the Republican Party will actually try wooing us after 2014 when I think they may really lose. They will need something to contrast with Democrats as right now they seem to be trying to keep their relevance as something not a democrat wearing a elephant pin; and not another Jack-Ass.
Either way; as a man I hate both parties. I almost hate the vast majority of American women. Their largely silent, if not outright cheering when a man anywhere is violated; like Ozzy’s wonderful Demoness on the talk when the dude got his junk completely violated, then destroyed.
I agree with you, Republicans view us as a means to an end. They actually value male disposability as a good thing. Yet, so do the Demoncrats.
They view us as disposable in an entirely different way; as they are the ones much more responsible for most fo the darker days of our Republic. From slavery to abortion; Democrats have been on the forefront of evil mistreatment of human beings as a good thing. Sometimes I swear the Devil runs the Liberal left, and Gary Busey runs the Republicans.
As a man, I will defer to neither. I will not tolerate either party doing to men as a whole what Democrats did to blacks after Jim Crow. Like you said, if they own their crap and then apologize, what will they woo us with? Our own welfare?
Not gonna happen. Men in our movement refuse to be labeled a victim, we just want to be left the hell alone. Neither party wants to leave any citizen alone, and out of their manipulative reach.
If you want to run into the arms of what I suspect is your favorite party I won’t stop you!
Now, I mean no disrespect; but I sure as hell won’t join you either.
I think the people on here supporting the rights of men as a group are looking at this the wrong way. If we can restore individual rights then most of the problems men face will solve themselves (since the many safety nets that allow women to misbehave without having to face the consequences will be gone)
SL, its a long shot although a possibility that if the MRA can make large enough percentage of the populace to wake up to the injustice that the Democrats may re-align, I doubt it, but it did take Republican administrations to open detente with Mao and Breshnev, could you imagine the red bait howling from the right if a Democrat attempted the same thing. It probably took a Democrat, Clinton to repeal the Glass-Steagall banking reform act that had been pushed by the Republicans.
53 Republican senators voted for the repeal and only 1 Democrat.
44 Democratic senators voted against the repeal , no Republicans voted against it. Both parties are responsible for the magnitude of the ongoing financial crisis, but the Republicans laid the philosophical groundwork going back to Reaganomics that has produced our Welfare-Queen Socialized Banking System
I agree with the conservatives here about many of the points they make about the Democrats ( I no way can see myself ever voting for them). But the conservatives have blinders on regarding the Republicans or (socialism is only good for the rich party)
While I am at it, (here is a rant) the level of debate around these parts regarding Obamacare Medicare, and projected demographics on healthcare costs with or without reform and it how will affect the epidemiology of disease ,our industrial policy and economy; is on par with the reason and logic displayed by Fembots over at Jezebel. Pathetic is much to lenient. I have not read one basic, next step answer to the cost issue again with or without reform. Who is going to pay for it??? Do you lock very sick people out of the hospitals to die. Who pays for the uninsured right now??? The Right is bellowing about “Death Panels” one election cycle and scary “Obamacare” the next before they run and stick their heads in the sand ,then they pull their heads out and start throwing rocks in another four years.
Whew. “glad I got that off my chest”
The Republicans are generally regarded as the lesser of two evils when it comes to misandry for a good reason: the Democrats are actually worse, and misandry is actually more ingrained in the Democratic party platform.
A good analogy is libertarian Republicans saying that the Republican party has a golden opportunity to sweep up younger Americans by supporting the legalization of Marijuana before the Democrats start doing so in a big way. It might be true, and it might actually be in line with the stated ideals of the Republican party, but there is no chance in hell the Republicans will go against the war on drugs. It’s simply too ingrained in the Republican party.
The older I get the bigger the piles of stupid become . the Dems get a stupid Idea and the Rep. Put wheels on it a parade it around town .
8 years of bush taking stupid to new heights followed by Obama reinforcing the stupid with sharp sticks .
Both Party’s can go straight to hell . Hayes both Roosevelt’s and bush and Obama all come from the same University , Harvard .
This reads like one big giant campaign ad. I find myself wondering if the author is extremely high or just a boot licking statist. There is not one civil liberty for men that has not been trampled on by both sides. At least the republicans don’t discriminate when they stomp on our rights (TSA, FISA Courts). Most of the really heinous violations of men’s rights are driven by the Demcrats with the GOP standing by or going along for political survival. Ask yourself this, which states have the worst family courts? All of them are controlled by Democrats (Masschusetts, California, Hawaii). One of things that we are starting to see is the slightest hint of Libertarian influence on the GOP. If it catches on, it will offer far more hope for the future of men than a Federal Gov’t controlled by the Party of Women (Democrats). Libertarians have made some headway here in NH by getting rid at least one crappy judges through the Legislature.
At the end of the Democrats and Republicans have dinner together while mocking their.constituents.
Men are depended upon during the worst of times. During ‘good times’, the typical selfish female ‘feels’ that she is some sort of goddess who deserves everything her way.
I’ve been hearing the word “recovery” for 3 years now but I don’t see it.
It’s just some sort of word tossed around by Democrats and liberals. When the economy doesn’t pick up ( and it cannot under the socialist directives of the current president) then the importance of men will once again be paramount. Too bad that it has to be this way.
“With Republicans trying to bring more unskilled immigrants while abolishing Medicare and privatizing Social Security, why would I vote for them? What’s in it for me?”
Given that Social Security, Medicare and most social insurance programs heavily redistribute resources from men to women, I guess you just answered your own question.
But I doubt either Republicans or Democrats have much intention of abolishing such programs unless or until the government is bankrupt and they have no choice. Alas, much politics these days is all about dealing with fictional enemies and straw men. Those evil Republicans who want to shrink government! If only they actually existed.
The author of this piece does offer some interesting ideas and observations (even though I don’t care much for his overall objective, and I have no real interest in either of the morally bankrupt Democrat or Republican parties being in a permanent majority now).
The Democrats, and other centre-left parties, could easily win a majority of both men and women by ditching feminism. Hard-core feminists will really have nowhere else to go. Women (especially single women and minority women) will lean left so long as they are more dependent on government. And men will be pleased to hear anyone call BS on feminism.
Feminism relies on a welfare state and a police state to survive. But the opposite is not the case. The welfare state, or any other government function, does not depend solely on feminism as its only raison d’etre.
The left could maintain the welfare state and keep women as a dependent government class that can be milked for votes. But ditch the feminist ideological baggage that accompanies it, thus providing a rallying cry to secure male votes.
Economic “leftist” here (didn’t vote for Obama–he’s in thrall to the Rubin/Summers/Greenspan neoliberal ideal) who believes in the patriarchal family and other tenets usually associated these days with “the right”.
Not all Democrats are Andrea Dworkinites, any more than all Republicans are followers of Ayn Rand.
Keep drinkin’ the kool-aid dude.
Since Republicans don’t have a platform for men and boys, they must be against men and boys. Since the Democrats are the “Party of Social Justice”, they’ll realize the evil of their ways, of letting feminists have too much power in their party, and start a big internal reform that includes Men’s Rights or gender equality, so they can win more male votes from Republicans. Honestly, are you high or something?
You have no idea what you’re talking about son.
Somewhere an Occupy Wall Street rally is missing a participant.
Fear not, for the failure of the Dems Socialist policies will have to blatantly reveal itself before the Republicans ever gain power again. The longer the Dems retain power, the more the USA looks like Sweden. Is that what you want? To live in a Feminist state?
The left could maintain the welfare state and keep women as a dependent government class that can be milked for votes. But ditch the feminist ideological baggage that accompanies it, thus providing a rallying cry to secure male votes.
What do you consider “feminist ideological baggage”?
Unencumbered abortion rights?
“Free” healthcare?
Equal pay for equal work?
Govt enforced “Disaparate impact” hiring and promotion policies?
“Free”childcare?
Title IX in STEM throughout publicly funded academia?
I can see it now at the next Democratic Convention when Hillary Clinton accepts her uncontested party’s nomination – – “We are no longer just the Party of Women, but the party of both women AND men! That recognizes Men’s Rights are Human Rights!” Little tingles will go up the liberal MRA’s leg…as he wakes up and realizes it was all a dream.
“What do you consider “feminist ideological baggage”?”
Put simply, I would describe feminist ideological baggage as being policies that assume equal labour market outcomes between men and women are desirable and the litmus test of true gender equality, policies that pretend that all women’s problems are largely due to societal sexism and inequality rather than innate biological differences between the sexes, the promotion of faux female independence and empowerment which is just a cover for increased dependence on government. It is possible that society could maintain some policies that protect and support women to some degree, while dropping the cover and pretence of feminist ideological dross and faux independence. Of course, that would involve some shift to a slightly more honest or overt emphasis on more traditional paternalism as the underlying motivation.
I am not suggesting that such an approach would solve all the problems, or that I am even sympathetic to it. All I am saying is that it is interesting, as an intellectual exercise, to consider whether such a political strategy would work.
Keyster:
Do the Republicans have you on their payroll or something?
Seriously all you ever do is whine if anyone mentions the knife the Republican party has repeatedly thrust in men’s backs, simply because it isn’t as deadly as the sword that the Democrats have been using to hack at our heads.
At this point, “marginally less evil” isn’t good enough, and neither of these parties is the solution. The good thing is that the Republican party looks on the verge of a split within the next election cycle and I don’t think the Democrats (for all their attempts to demonize white males and thus keep their fragile coalitions together) will last much longer in the racial/sexual spoils system they have set up.
People like you sicken me, because there is literally NOTHING the Republican party can do that will get you to suggest not voting for them (writing in a third party, not voting, etc) let alone vote the occasional decent Democrat.
Party loyalty all the way, Dude!
Keyster
You are either complicit with all this left right bull shite or very naive ? Failing the above you may simply be suffering from extreme cognitive disonance but, from what I know of you, you are way too smart for the later.
BREAKING!! Australian Politician Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21 & Club of Rome
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEPk4kBacWM&list=HL1362313053&feature=mh_lolz
Here you go Keyster. I am sure you will enjoy this video.
Lord Christopher Monckton – Agenda 21 and Environmental Marxism.
You can’t get anymore right wing conservative than this guy. A former advisor to the Thatcher government. Right up your street mate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hyl9YzJsQg
After watching the above two videos, if you still think it is all conspiracy tin foil hat stuff, then you my foreign friend, are away with the feckin fairies.
P.s. From the first video I posted. I didn’t know that Bush Snr Republican President of the USA was a supporter and promoter of cultural Marxism. AKA as globalism. Did you ?
It’s hard to believe that Clarence still has learned nothing in the last couple years. I guess it’s true: you can lead a jackass to the water but you can’t make him drink. He would rather get the crumbs from Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein’s table.
P.S. – Records show the last “decent Democrat” died around 1988, so they are an extinct species.
Neither political party is bending over backwards to help men, because the GOP figures they’ve already got the biggest plurality of them (the white ones) and the Dems are too busy demonizing large constituencies of same. But you have to bend over backwards and kiss your own ass to think a widespread renunciation of feminism and embrace of men’s rights would ever wash on the left. I would welcome that, because it would be catastrophic for them, and the adults could regain control.
The left is not going to throw feminism under the bus. Feminism is one totalitarian movement that has succeeded and the left has a hard on for totalitarians, whether it’s Josef Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Kim Jong-Il or Pol Pot, if it shits on individual liberties,brutally murders innocent human beings, and threatens to force millions of square pegs into the same round hole simultaneously,forcibly and against their will, you can be sure every leftist has jerked off to it at least once.
Their political philosophy is basically a form of rape,since they aren’t content to govern their own dysfunctional lives with it but must,must,must no matter what the cost,force it on others. Take gun control for instance. Every American citizen has the right to own any gun they can keep and bear on them. That is literally the law of the land. What do liberals do? Demand to know why you need an AR-15. I don’t need it. I want it. And I have the right to have it, end of discussion.
Why do women need abortions? They have their choice of hundreds of contraceptives, an unwanted pregnancy should never reach the point where an abortion is necessary. Do they make women justify why they should have one? No, it’s taken for granted that they need no excuse,since the law says they can have one.
So Piers Morgan gets on tv and like a date rapist says “Come on,baby, I’ll be gentle (with gun control).” and “Don’t you love me (or the kids at Sandy Hook)?” “Why do you need your virginity?” and wheedles and chisels trying to force his way into the pants, and gun cabinets, of America.
It’s a form of rape because it’s people trying to force themselves uninvited into the most intimate spaces of people’s lives.Leftists complain about the Church being intrusive, but I can’t remember a time in the last few centuries in the U.S. when church attendance was prompted by the barrel of a gun, Leftist political indoctrination though,that’s a different story.
Even if they did a complete 180 turnaround policy-wise,I wouldn’t vote for any of these fucks. Every one of them is an aspiring Adolf Hitler. They’re fucking batshit insane,as well as being idiots. Their “great socialist revolution” will be undone by 30 minutes of real life because all the people they indoctrinated will be dead as doornails after the artificial world they live in goes bye-bye. It’s like Leonardo Da Vinci using an etch-a-sketch to paint his masterpiece on.Nobody with any capacity for logical thought at all would do the things they have done. Even if they were aware that their “utopia” will result in starvation and law of the jungle ruling because their bullshit is too convoluted and makes no sense to anyone,they wouldn’t care. They’d kill us all just to get their way. That’s fucking retarded,given that there is no urgent crisis,no shortage of goods, or anything at all to prompt this little game of russian roulette other than a general understanding of how absolutely worthless and replaceable they are in the society they have created.
Granted, the Right is basically a second asshole in that all it does is preserve the changes these nutjobs make until they can get around, inexorably, to changing things incrementally towards Communism once again. And I don’t doubt that for a lot of them, this is intentional, as others stated above.
What we need is a political party that will wipe the slate clean and go back to the original amendments,and extend voting rights to these fruitcakes only after they have proven that they aren’t textbook sociopaths and/or high-functioning retards. That would effectively deny voting rights to over 80% of them….which is fine. You don’t want people “voting” for a dictatorship,just send them to North Korea where there already is one. They’ll get just as tired of worshiping “Dear Leader” as the rest of us are in very short order,and best of all, they’ll be stuck with their choice,instead of the rest of us.
Fuck the Republicans and the Democrats,down with Big Brother and up with constitutional governance and national sovereignty.I’m tired of laws that make no sense and un-appointed self-deputized moralizing busybodies” convicting” people of things that aren’t even illegal and shouldn’t be in any sane universe, like 6 year old boys pointing chicken fingers at people and saying “bang bang”. Isn’t anyone else tired of this stupid bullshit yet? Wanna be subjected to mob violence for smoking a cigarette or using a plastic bag? We’re dangerously close to this becoming a reality. I’d rather see all these moronic whackjobs shot to death by crazed gunmen than live under their upside-down notion of how the world’s supposed to work.
I’d never tell anyone to shoot them, nor would I applaud their deaths, but if God came to me and told me “Either these people will be your unaccountable masters, or I will have them all shot by lone nut gunmen. Choose.” I’d take the latter in a heartbeat because the former choice means that I and millions of innocent people like myself get to die of starvation,because they manage money worse than compulsive gamblers with crack addictions,or get shot to death in their political re-education camps. No one alive today has any excuse for not knowing that when radical leftists rule,millions of people die for no reason. The same is true of radical rightists,incidentally, but it is incidental because radical rightists are fairly rare in top positions whereas radical leftists in power are a dime a dozen.
The Left can suck a dick…they’re into that anyway….well, the Leftist men are at least.
So you would destroy the economic and cultural foundation if the US in return for being made an honorary member of the Democrat Party’s Stable of Victims?
Men’s rights is important, but nothing is worth becoming a self obsessed, single issue voter like this encourages.