Feminist Intimidation Tactics at Tech Conferences

by W.F. Price on February 26, 2013

Despite often expressing revulsion about advances from the beta males who make up the majority of tech workers, scientists, hackers, atheists, etc., feminists seem to want very badly to force themselves into these mainly male, and almost entirely male-created, domains. Whether it’s the money, the sense of power they get from pushing socially awkward men around, or just old fashioned nosiness, feminists like Rebecca Watson simply can’t keep themselves away from them.

If said women actually added to the ambience, were pleasant and helpful, or simply made themselves a neutral presence, it wouldn’t be a problem, but this is not how it goes down.

A couple years ago two feminists, Mary Gardiner and Valerie Aurora, founded the Ada Initiative, a group dedicated to policing tech conferences. One idea the group came up with was the distribution of color-coded cards they call “creeper move cards” to warn people that they have crossed some feminist line. Red cards are for egregious violations of feminist rules, yellow cards serve as warnings, and green ones are for approval. It’s infantile, and you’d think it would be easier to simply tell someone to his face what you think, but feminists do have an authoritarian streak, so perhaps they enjoy playing at being police handing out citations.

The red card contains a blatant physical threat:


Just imagine if some man handed you something like that. It would be infuriating. If he didn’t have a badge and a gun you’d be sorely tempted to let him have it. However, for all their talk about the patriarchy and male privilege, feminists are aware that they can get away with threatening men with violence with impunity.

Although reacting to the threats from feminists may not be a good idea, it’s sad that the organizers of the conference allow women to traipse around handing out threats to attendees. If the guys in charge had any spine at all, they’d have them thrown out immediately and 86ed from any future conferences. But amazingly they choose to indulge them, and give them veto power over topics.

A sex-positive female blogger who goes by “Violet Blue” prepared a seminar on drugs, sex and their interactions for Security BSides, a conference on network security. The Ada Initiative, sensing a cause to rally around, declared it a presentation on date rape.

I arrived at the Security BSides venue half an hour before my talk was set to begin, and I tracked down the main organizer to get connected with the speaker wrangler. I found him next door at DNA Pizza, where he was talking with this person. I apologized for the interruption, the organizer told me where to wait, and the woman he was talking to smiled at me. I smiled back.

The organizer came into the LockSport Lounge around 10 minutes later and asked if he could speak with me. I asked Eric Michaud to join me.

The organizer said, “So, I need to ask you: is there any rape in your talk?”

I said, “Is there any WHAT in my talk?” I was shocked.

“Well, there’s been a complaint about your talk.” He continued, “It’s from someone who is a rape survivor and they said they will be triggered by your talk if there’s any rape in it.”

“No, no, there’s no rape in my talk. I talk about human sexual systems and the effects drugs, including caffeine and alcohol, affect the performance of these systems and the dangers of mixing different things. What’s going on here?”

He replied, “Someone has said they will be triggered by your talk, and they’re a rape survivor.”

“Okay. In the talk I do cover ‘date rape’ drugs, and I explain their actions and how they’re dangerous.”

Then he said, “Do you describe how to use date rape drugs? They said that if you are going to tell people how to use date rape drugs then it’s the same as rape, and there’s going to be a problem.”

I told the organizer, “Wow, this really sucks – I know it’s not your fault. Well, how about if I shift the talk to a different room? We could put it on the smaller stage where the room has doors that close, or I could do it in the LockSport Lounge. Hell, I can even present it at the afterparty, it’s no problem. What is going to be easiest for you? It looks like you’re in a shitty position.”

“No, they’re here and they’re not leaving. They told me they’ll make it into a bigger problem if you do your talk.”

I paused for a minute. I said, “Okay. I guess I won’t give my talk, then. I don’t want this to be a problem for you, you’re in a shit position. It sounds like this person is going to make it into a bigger problem no matter what you do. It’s no big deal, don’t worry about it. Maybe I can do a video of the talk and BSides can have it as an after-con talk.”

The way the organizer looked at me, I knew that wouldn’t happen, either.

I said, “Anyway, I’m just going to hang out here and drink beer with friends.”

And that was that.

It’s absolutely amazing that the organizers caved so easily to pressure from these feminist thugs. We all know feminists are solidly opposed to free speech, and that the censorious impulse runs very strong in that breed, but you’d think at least some men have the balls to stand up to them.

The feminists, for their part, are gloating over their triumph. Rather than contribute anything meaningful to computer security, or anything entertaining or interesting at all (as was Violet Blue’s intent), they do nothing but shut down those that “offend” them.

How do you deal with these kinds of people? Sometimes, it might be tempting to adopt their tactics and try to shut them down, but that would be a violation of our principles. Instead, we should speak against them, defy them, and refuse to comply. I suppose we could call it “cultural disobedience.” Feel free, also, to hold those who cave in to their demands to be every bit as responsible for pointless censorship as the feminists. Every company, every organization and every community that submits to feminist demands should be held accountable for making the world a little less free.

{ 42 comments… read them below or add one }

Anonymous Reader February 26, 2013 at 20:11

This is simply another version of the “heckler’s veto”. One response: let Violet Blue give her talk, and security can escort anyone making a disturbance outside, where they can be handed over to police on a charge of “public disturbance”.

Irony: Violet Blue is a very sex-positive feminist, who is caving in to a form of radical feminism.

Ada Initiative is essentially attempting to spread a feminist sharia…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Brian February 26, 2013 at 20:23

How do you deal with them? Everybody knows the obvious answer. You deal with them the same way you deal with troublemakers anywhere. Give them fair warning to stop whatever you don’t want them to do, and if they still don’t comply, call security or the police or physically force them away yourself. Do what you have to do.

But the big concerns are political and legal repercussions. With so much utter misandry everywhere, do you really think the government won’t punish you for opposing the “poor, hapless, victimized women” who want nothing more than to rob you, enslave you, and maybe kill you? Do you really think public perception would support you even if you had all the right in the world on your side?

The risk is just too much, isn’t it?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader February 26, 2013 at 20:29

So what red card should men be carrying around tech conferences to hand to women who harass them in some way?

I wonder if the implied threat of physical violence on the “creeper card” rises to the level of assault, in a state such as California?

Note that that this is part of an attempt to shove women into open source projects (“imposter syndrome” being part of that), regardless of qualifications. I expect that numeric quotas as a demand can’t be too far off.

“Trigger warning” appears to be the latest feminist method of censorship.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Anonymous February 26, 2013 at 20:30

Our way or the highway, comrade! (Feminists and left/libtards love the “offensive” excuse.)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Anon7 February 26, 2013 at 20:32

I’ve spent time at tech conferences in San Francisco – typically 50 to 1 male, owing to the code-heavy presentations – and I do not look forward to having to deal with useless distractions.

I was taught not to fight with females, so I’m at a loss regarding what to do if someone tries to card me about some supposed faux pas. OTOH, I refuse to let anyone spoil my conference visits; I’ll probably attend at least one of them in San Francisco this summer.

Perhaps I’ll need to construct a card of my own: how about teaching them about coding!


It’s easy to learn to code, because its just a matter of creating a set of instructions. Can you execute code like a computer? It’s easy! Just follow this set of instructions:

turn your back on me
a = 1000
while a > 1:
take one step forward
a = a – 1


BTW, the Ada Initiatve seems to have sprung into being from this site:

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader February 26, 2013 at 20:32

Brian has a good point. So the long term effects of the heckler’s veto via “trigger warning” hysteria will be to drive young men out of these fields. Who needs the hassle? Just avoid women as much as possible, in every way possible. In tech that is still doable, although when Title IX is applied to STEM that will no longer be true.

Feminist sharia…perhaps men should attend these events wearing full up burkhas, in order to avoid giving a “trigger” or otherwise offending the holy feministas?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Glenn February 26, 2013 at 20:52

The new fad of the faux “geek girl” is making the rounds over at 4chan and other gamer-oriented webpages. We have come to the conclusion that, due to the miserable economy, females have decided to lift and shift fire as means to glom onto guys that are tech savvy, and thus more employable.

The females also recognize that male computer users are both easy to bully, and have a much lower expectations from females. A true Happy Hunting Ground for attention whoring tarts that have been given the “Tits or GTFO” ultimatum one too many times from guys like myself.

We may be seeing trend emerging where average American females see the need to move to the greener pastures of the pseudo-intelligencia (read: nerds) tech scene. Now… should we assume the regular feeding troughs (sports bars, night clubs, etc) that young females have exploited over the last 40 years are no longer capable of providing what the little darlings seek? This should be a fun situation to watch unfold.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
crella February 26, 2013 at 21:13

This whole bit about ‘trigger warnings’ is just ridiculous. ‘Trigger’ what? I thought women were powerful, and any woman can kick any man’s arse, but evidently certain words render them helpless!? What the hell!?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
El Bastardo February 26, 2013 at 21:54

How do you deal with these kinds of people? -WP

You can’t do the same, like you said. We will have to build up our movement to where we are fairly close to normal business conversations.

When that many are aware of us; it will be fairly routine that when one of these fascists run their mouth an orginizer of any event will politely ask them to leave. They will also ask them without fear; which I feel is the main motivation for caving in the first place.

Who wants to be called a “rape apologist” at a major networking event with professional peers?

Women got the card for right now; but apparently they are working on passing it away. :)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
MRA February 26, 2013 at 22:48

The same way Nazism operates, shaming, bulling, there is a lot of pressure from the pink mafia to destroy the tech world that men created, no surprising these same men many are beta males like Zuckernberg that succumb very easily to them, look how Sheryl Sandberg gets pay for being a women at Facebook, or how Yahoo only makes headlines today because its CEO is a woman (but got her job at Google in the 90′s because she dated one of the founders) these women ignore those men while in their younger years but right after they make the “next big thing” that makes them billionaires they are bullied to carter to the same women that actually hated them.

Women love the destroyers while hate and enslave the creators, they love how men destroy each other in theirs behalf, we can say that all wars have been fought for men seeking female approval (like Cleopatra) and still tday we are fighting because women want it, the war in middle east is marketed as “freedom for women from the region”.

The tech world is not different.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
greyghost February 26, 2013 at 23:23

Now the tech world would be a good market for some red pill. Welmer you have just discovered a place to write social columns. Tech world magazines. Those intelligent blue pill minds will figure out what red pill is and it will be something to see how they handle themselves in the future.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Opus February 27, 2013 at 02:46

Is this an ideal opportunty to say what I think really happened with plain-faced spectacle-wearing Rebecca Watson? I have watched her podcast a few times: she says that she was at an Atheist conference in Dublin; and was at the Bar with a bunch of guys until 4 A.M. The Hotel must otherwise, even in Ireland, have been dead. She says she announced that she is bush-wacked and would retire for the night. The next thing: she is in the elevator with Creepy-Elevator-Dude. Now, where did he come from? if not from the group of people she had been drinking with. She must therefore have left the Bar with him – the one material fact that she omits from her rant. Once in the elevator he launches into his famous speech: he could hardly have been less ‘Rapey’ if he had tried, giving Skepchick the opportunity to make her excuses had she wanted to. He however misreads her lascivious intentions, and being a strong independent woman of thirty-one years of age and only three months out from the end of her one year marriage, can’t cope. What really annoys Elevator-Diva-Watson, is not that she was hit on – she was clearly up for it, as one can deduce from her naked calender shoot and various other less-than-decent photographs such as the one where she is seen grinning as dollar-bills are pushed down her low-cut cleavage, but that Elevator-Dude was not being sufficiently direct about his intentions, and nothing annoys a woman more than (perceived) rejection.

All that of course assumes that the event ever happened. In support of the idea that it is a deliberate fabrication on her part is the fact that no one has come forward, not even Spartacus style, to claim to be creepy Elevator Dude.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
DCM February 27, 2013 at 03:08

This garbage is why our ancestors wisely barred females from many meetings and organizations. The majority of them, unable to contribute appropriately, try to ruin things for people who can.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Opus February 27, 2013 at 03:19

Having got Rebecca Watson off my chest (so to speak) I have in the last year or so, taken considerable interest in Tech and its conferences (including and in particular) the large one last June at London’s BatterseaEvolution. This is my obervation:

Tech strikes me as the most posey of modern industries. Following the Battersea Tech Conference (via Twitter), I learned nothing, other than that – and these were the most tweeted revelations:

1. The most popular part of Huff-Po is the Divorce section – The Plagiarist and social-riser Adriana Huffington came along perfcectly coiffured, to tell the delegates that.

2. The most popular Meme of the Conference (from some sort of German comedy act) was ‘Fuck Analogue’. Yes that seem to be the level of the conference.

3. The conference ended with a set from an American Comedian.

4. At the end of the first day the attendees – at least the few that remained sfter 5 PM- were entertained by some sort of Rap Artistes.

5. On the morning of the first day, the WiFi broke down!!

The purpose of the conference is obviously to sell softeware but for the attendees it is just an excuse to get out of the office, and mingle and drink. For women it is an opportunity to put on a nice frock and put themselves in the way of men, as most Tech is male. There are however some creepy-bitter-loser-women who cannot gain male interest and it is these who like to complain, as with Watson, of non-existent male interest.

By way of example go to Twitter and look-up the less than attractive Pauline Sargent and her project requiring photos of women (only women of course) in Tech for her DigitalSavy project at http://WWW.socialzavvy.ie. Her photo holding up the placard says she is a Digiwoman. That is like me putting go-faster stripes on my clapped-out, Morris Minor. No one will mistake my car for a Ferreari, and no one will mistake her for a hot woman. If women have to boast of how they are so good at Tech then that can only be because they are anything but.

My advice for those who may be in receipt of one of those red-cards, is surely to report the matter to the local police, as the card is a written threat of battery, not of course that the police will take any notice.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
W.F. Price February 27, 2013 at 03:36


Funny about the calendars. I checked it out and it seems that not just Watson, but many of these wannabe nerd girls have been busy exposing themselves online.

BTW, do you have an email that works? I’m trying to bring all the regulars into the system, and I tried to ask you about that via email, but it doesn’t seem to have gone through. If you’re curious just send me an email through the contact form (click “contact” link above) and I’ll fill you in.

Opus February 27, 2013 at 04:18


The wonderful irony of Skepchick, and the other ‘Calender Girls’ complaining about male attention and then posing nude for Calenders. Watson poses beside a chart of The Periodic Table. Yet another male invention (largely Mendeleyev, the Russian, I seem to recall). The female reasoning seem to be, ‘I am not that hot, but if I remove as much clothing as I dare – though tastefully covered – and make some sort of assertion of intellectual ability, then I will get the same attention as genuinely hot-girls. Obviously it can work, for as the old saying has it, ‘You fuck the Nurses but marry the (female) Doctors’. – and (next thread) two, hundred thousand dollar incomes are considerably better than one, although as the number of male Doctors declines the harder it is for the likes of pie-faced Watson to snag their top-quality man, especially as she is now an over-thirties divorcee. No wonder she is so angry, indeed spitting when top-biologist and otherwise paid-up liberal, Richard Dawkins inadvertantly belittles Watson’s real intentions – no wonder she is refusing to promote his books, ever again – at least in this life – and let us not forget that Dawkins is married to (the very lovely and beautifully spoken) Romana 1, ex Doctor Who assistant, The Honourable Lalla Ward (for that is her correct mode of address, being the daughter of an Aristo).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Algarath February 27, 2013 at 04:39

Lolol they shut down a talk that might have helped people prevent date rape. They are now actively supporting rape. My head is spinning

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Lyn87 February 27, 2013 at 06:24

Agree & Amplify.

The proper response is to carry safety pins on your pockets, and every time some chick gives you a red or yellow card, pin it to your shirt like a military ribbon.

You have proof-positive that you pissed off a feminist with an entitlement complex (but I repeat myself) – wear it like the badge of honor that it is.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
patriarch February 27, 2013 at 06:28

So far, the best thing that I have come up with to tell feminists (which means most women) so as to stop them in their tracks is to describe them as being the one thing that they fear they are the most. Bitch gets in my face and says anything to piss me off and I just say, “you’re insane”. Try it. It’s seriously better than saying “shut the fuck up” (the second best option) because women have been trained from birth to disobey orders and/or ignore all suggestions from men. It really gets their heads spinning. First, because fear of being insane is a natural fear most women seem to have, (does anybody here wonder why?) whether they want to or not, they will consider whether or not the statement is accurate. After that, it is a hard decision for them to decide whether or not to argue the point because that would put them on the defensive, something they usually have little or no experience with. And, if they are in a group, it further complicates matters for them. They must contemplate what the groups opinion of the statement is: “Do they think I’m insane?” Feminists have dominated the debate from top to bottom because they’ve been able to silence dissent by making dissent uncomfortable to say the least. We need to turn the tables.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
geographybeefinalisthimself February 27, 2013 at 06:31

“Sometimes, it might be tempting to adopt their tactics and try to shut them down, but that would be a violation of our principles.”

I would consider sinking to their level. Nothing to lose by doing just that.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer February 27, 2013 at 06:56

Run of the Mill attention whoring.

As for forced inclusion of women in OpenSource, ridiculuous as the only qualification for this is interest, enthusiasm, and the willingness to share for the pleasure of having others admire or use your work.
I use open-source code a lot. Just a few days ago needed to do some tricks between CAD and physics modeling codes and within a few minutes found some utilities from different authors that I cobbled together to do something pretty amazing. Also have produced a lot of drawings lately using skills I will discuss in my upcoming Learn 3D Modeling and often use complex drawings donated to the public domain by CAD jockeys (overwhelmingly male) from around the globe. My clients love these drawings. I have found two things that have a huge payout for the effort 1) making drawings and visualizations , and 2) making business connections and finding funding opportunities.Without those men freely sharing their creations and utilities my work would be much harder to produce.

Recently The Atlantic ran an essay by some chick demanding that tech conferences discussion panels marquee more females. Forcing conference attendees to “hear women’s voices” on matters that they have no genuine interest in is sure to liven the dullest conference, such as the recent American Society of Plumbing Engineers wild 2012 bacchanalia , which they hope to outdo in their upcoming 2014 convention. A bunch of party animals those guys.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
scatmaster February 27, 2013 at 08:24

I would consider sinking to their level. Nothing to lose by doing just that.

I do it all the time. Shocks the hell out of them.
You know you have won when their best response is “cock-sucker”.
Real intellect there.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
keyster February 27, 2013 at 08:52

Feminism (and leftism in general) permeates High Tech because of so many people working for Hewlet-Packard and spreading their “management style” (obsession with diversity and inclusion), as they left and went to start-ups and other companies. Executives think someone from HP must be really smart and it looks great on a resume, but the very first sign a company is on it’s way to failure is when someone from HP is brought in to manage something. They have no creativity whatsoever and are obsessed with processes, like product life cycles, product teams, ISO 9000, Six Sigma, etc. – that just paralyze innovation.

I worked for several ex-HP bosses, and they were all horrible bosses and worse managers – and very liberal “fairness” oriented, ALWAYS going to great pains to hire useless women that just sat in meetings and took notes…typically because they’d be on some process oversight commitee. God Encorpera is Hell!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
TFH February 27, 2013 at 10:49

Meh…. a lot of men in tech are manginas, so this is merely the cost of their lack of spine being transferred back onto them.

What women think is ‘tech’ is Facebook and Zynga.

The real tech, the hard-science field, is not going to infiltrated by women, since they just don’t know where to begin, and how to infiltrate those conferences.

Feminists will invade a conference where Facebook is a major presence.

Feminists will not invade a conference devoted to carbon nanotubes or silicon lithography.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Mobile PT February 27, 2013 at 10:54

Lyn87 gets my vote for the best suggestion so far.

Just smile and let her bloviate. Then, “Are you done? Thank you for sharing!”, delivered with a s-t eating grin (keeping your head high and looking down your nose at her), spin on heels and walk away.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
RMM February 27, 2013 at 15:17

Get your own red cards and give them to the dearies in exchange for theirs.


If you have received this card, you have done something to the person who handed this to you that only those you claim to hate would do. Get yourself a nice warm cup of STFU to go with your family-sized serving of hypocrisy, and consider yourself lucky that society frowns upon the very same threats of violence you are handing out yourself.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
C Me February 27, 2013 at 16:39

Anon 7
turn your back on me
a = 1000
while a > 1:
take one step forward
a = a – 1

Very classic. Another way not so Old School..

int go;
boolean gone;

void main()
{while gone != true

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Highwasp February 27, 2013 at 17:41

OK :

a = 1000
while a > 1:
take one step forward
a = a – 1

Lawsuit: Prosthetic penis led to Pennsylvania woman’s firing
Published January 13, 2012
Associated Press

SCRANTON, Pa. – A northeastern Pennsylvania woman claims she was fired from her job for wearing a prosthetic penis to work while contemplating gender reassignment.

Pauline Davis filed a federal civil rights lawsuit Wednesday against J&J Snack Foods Corp. over her termination from the company’s plant in Moosic, near Scranton.

Davis says she wore the prosthetic to work as a line inspector, informing some co-workers who passed in the information along to management. According to the suit Davis was fired even though the device didn’t interfere with her work.

Davis’ suit claims a male employee undergoing hormone treatments and female clothing was treated more favorably.

The suit was first reported by the Philadelphia Daily News. A phone message left by The Associated Press at New Jersey-based J&J was not immediately returned Friday.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/01/13/lawsuit-prosthetic-penis-led-to-pennsylvania-womans-firing/#ixzz2M9SSZsB6

((Davis’ suit claims a male employee undergoing hormone treatments and female clothing was treated more favorably.)) wait a minute!

a dyke wears a dildo under her pants, to create the oh so coveted ‘bulge’ ‘package’ so as to enhance her authority over others whom she manages in a professional sense = she gets paid to manage but not for sexual intimidation or harassment… it’s a ‘penis’ beotch! welcome to my world… and her complaint is that the male ‘he-she’ employee who is ‘undergoing’ hormone treatments and wearing a dress to work is treated more fairly…! MORE FAIRLY!! WELCOME TO MY WORLD DYKE! HAA hAhAHAA – I don’t care who you are ~ That’s funny! “WE ARE ALL EQUAL – BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS”… HA. here we go… pass the popcorn and a beer!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Thos. February 27, 2013 at 20:12

Question: Let me see your code.

If the answer is a long boring story involving lots of hypotheticals, you don’t get the job.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Opus February 28, 2013 at 01:32

TFH is right – for Women, Tech means Facebook – one must distinguish between the salesmen and the programmers. I rather liked, if that is the correct word, the photo in the link I provided of four middle-aged, and otherwise plain women in fetching frocks, which nicely accentuate their breasts grinning aimlessly as women always seem to do when being photographed. What must be so galling for the women is that Tech (whether the genuinely High Tech version or Facebook-lite) is a recent invention, from a time when half if not more of graduates are women, and yet men still effortlessly dominate the field. The usual men-kept-us-out excuse just cannot wash. Perhaps that is why at Tech conferences women are excelling themselves in bitchiness, especially as the sort of guys in attendance are likely to be Mangina types, and not the man-jawed thugs they prefer.

The same surely also applies to Rebecca Watson and the Atheist Conference – I mean, what exactly once you have considered that maybe the world was not created (and might well have always existed) is there to say on the subject of Atheism, and if there is something, it was said long ago by people like Democritus (anti-Christianity or anti-Churchianity is of course another thing, and becomes a slanging match in a turf war). Elevator-gate thus gives us the opportunity to see the female hamster at work. How could a man with the smarts and as many degrees and published books as Professor Dawkins have failed to realise that just because there are (so in his liberal delusions he asserts) Muslim women genuinely suffering in hot-humid Third World hell-holes that it does not mean that women living in First World oppulance are not suffering equally. Only a un-retrained mysogynist could think otherwise. So long as just one of these women has so much as one pea under a layer of a dozen mattresses men must not rest, or be indifferent thereto. So much for the red corner: in the blue, there is that other Professor of Biology, P.Z.Myers, but if he thinks as he does that fawning Manginaism is going to get him even a whiff of Pussy he is mistaken; for women like Watson, even as they demand such treatment regard it and the men who behave thus as beneath contempt. What women want is Deep Fried Ice and men must provide it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
zeppo shemp February 28, 2013 at 05:52

slut shaming is bad.

creeper shaming is good.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Attila February 28, 2013 at 18:55

Why don’t they just volunteer to get into a cage? or in a pressurized capsule?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Attila February 28, 2013 at 18:56

Provide each fem-attendee with two dildos- one for each main orifice. Switch often as needed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Al March 4, 2013 at 20:58

You know that scene in Airheads where Brandon Fraiser takes his record contract and shoves it down his pants, then tosses it back at the guy.

Do that with those cards. Then dare em to give you another.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Brigadon March 11, 2013 at 05:15

Hey, I wanna know where I can get some of those cool cards, so I can wear them openly and leer menacingly at every ‘female’ at one of those cons and see how many I can collect during one frenetic weekend. If one is cute (which I doubt) I may even write her number on the back of the card after I fuck her.

I guess I just don’t attend the ‘cool cons’. Most of the cons I attend would get a girl subjected to a public flogging demonstration for even considering such an unfeminine idea :)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Nergal March 15, 2013 at 18:10

“I was taught not to fight with females, so I’m at a loss regarding what to do if someone tries to card me about some supposed faux pas. OTOH, I refuse to let anyone spoil my conference visits; I’ll probably attend at least one of them in San Francisco this summer.”

Hold the card so that it is clearly in view to the other party, take a butane lighter from your pocket, apply flame to the bottom corner of the card for 5-10 seconds. Place your butane lighter back in your pocket with the other hand. Now, with your free hand, raise it so that it is also in view, close it into a tight fist with only the finger next to your pointer finger extended. Hold your finger in their view for as long as the card burns,then throw the card down and stomp on it. Extra points if you unabashedly and publicly urinate on it to extinguish any lingering flames.

Regardless of what you received the card for in the first place, you will never receive one again. In the wacky world of women, extending an awkward invitation to coffee is the worst thing ever,practically a rape, while making statements and gestures contemptuous of the humanity of others and exposing your penis as a symbol of your own superiority means that you are most emphatically not a “creeper”, and are probably a very good person worthy of respect.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
chinesefootsoldier March 17, 2013 at 16:33

Imagine if a man said “you’re lucky you didn’t get punched” to a woman. See how they’d like it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Tubesteak March 18, 2013 at 03:25

Just use the ticket as a badge of honour.

If chicks are going to flash their boobs for attention then they can’t complain if some guy has a perve.

Even if they’re not flashing their boobs they can’t complain if some guy has a perve.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
bob March 22, 2013 at 17:33

Simply refuse to take the card

- OR -

Reach toward the card-offeror part way, then stop and let the witch look stupid.

Extra points if you make her drop the card.

As far as “forcing women into Open-Source” – good luck with that. You get big in that game by writing code. I suppose women could do valuable work in testing – what better way to assure that it is idiot-proof.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Artist March 23, 2013 at 11:06

Wasn’t there a phase about 10-15 years ago where liberals went around ticketing cars? I can’t remember exactly for what; perhaps for being a big, polluting car? Or maybe for having a rightwing bumper sticker?

I have a feminist neighbor who constantly calls the police, the sheriff, the zoning board, the county inspector, you name it. We live in a rural area with lax zoning and this woman acts like it’s a deed-restricted McMansion community. She loves to bring the power of the state down on her neighbors. It’s a Stalinist behavior, diming people in. As the punk rock band Minutemen said in their song about totalitarianism “you need names to play the game”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Anonymous March 30, 2013 at 16:44

I work in a place where the language is regularly so offensive I’ve printed some of these to use at work. I’s just disgusting and un-needed. Nothing to stop a guy (like me) from handing one of these out.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Criminals January 30, 2014 at 04:20

Unfortunately, men are too often pitted against one another to fight against unacceptable sexist behavior such as this.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: