Another good one from Chris Muir’s Day by Day.
Civilization and Cookie Dough
Login
-
Search Site
Contributor Blogroll
Categories
-
Recent Posts
Support The Spearhead
Or send check or money order to:
Price Content
To support The Spearhead on an ongoing basis and obtain access to extra content and features, sign up as a supporting subscriber.
PO Box 28282
Seattle, WA 98118-
Spearhead Author Jack Donovan
Buy Warren Farrell’s Seminal Book
Archives
{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
Posting on a previous article, someone mentioned feeling tainted, degraded and infantized after only very briefly having dealt with females, even related ones. Further back, females were deemed by their presence and actions to lower the social tone.
Is this misogyny or observation ?
Not relevant. Just something I thought you guys might find entertaining, and I don’t know where to post it:
So – got myself into a minor spot of trouble at a Collegium this weekend. I’m an amateur historian and am in the SCA. We get together and do medieval re-enactments. The giant gatherings of people in armor bashing each other with wooden swords gets most of the press, but every now and then we do a small academic gathering where instructors will do a 50 minute survey lecture on a favorite topic.
I went to Duchess Dierdre’s Medieval Erotica From The Eastern Worlds class. Or, as I like to think of it, Didi’s Dirty Pictures.
She was going over the impact and Western interpretation of harem culture as seen by returning Westerners, and showed us an 1800′s Victorian painting to make a point. It was titled “A Musical Interlude in the Harem.” Five pretty ladies, one dude. Very peaceful and serene.
Her Grace said, “So you can see how this would be a Western male fantasy.”
I couldn’t help myself. “Oh wow. I can see what you mean. Five different women. And ALL their mouths are closed at the SAME TIME.” And I heaved a huge sigh of Western Male Envy.
I got a laugh, but I will leave Duchess Dierdre’s response to you imagination, but it was as good a handling of a heckler as I’ve seen.
The REALLY funny bit was the other men in the room, edging away from me as though a lightning strike was coming.
What this cartoon leaves out is the fact that it was men who designed this cookie dough, so it would make women’s lives easier. Is it any surprise that the woman in the cartoon does nothing but try to eat it? Men’s labor- and you (women) expect to get the result for free and with no compensation to the man who made it or provided it for you.
Sounds a little like the current state of affairs in the USA, and then women wonder why MGTOW is so popular now.
Is this misogyny or observation?
It’s only misogyny if you point out negative stereotypical behavoir.
Women have power now, because men are not permitted to control them. You either fight them, behave like them yourself or ignore them altogether. Most men are choosing to behave like women because it’s easiest.
I’d like to point our that women’s demand for prepared foods like cookie dough in a tube is the single biggest factor in the obesity epidemic sweeping western civilization. Here’s what happened.
Women complained about housework. Men created products and services to lessen the burden of caring for a family. Women continued to complain, remarking that being forced to cook meals was akin to slavery, and demeaned women.
Men responded by creating what are called ‘processed foods’. Unfortunately, these foods tasted like cardboard, owing to the constraints imposed by industrial processing. So, men looked for inexpensive ways to make processed foods more palatable. Sugar was added; when high fructose corn syrup was invented (and made cheap by government intervention) that was added too.
End result: Americans eat over one hundred pounds of sugar per year more than their ancestors did. Why? Because women were too lazy to make dinner, that’s why.
Her empathy and caring? Caring about what? Herself? Where is her supposed empathy when it comes to paternity fraud or family court or boys education?
One small technical error: cookie dough is not made with yeast, but relies on other leavening mechanisms such baking soda, baking powder, aeration, etc.
@keyster
I prefer to ignore most of them altogether. Certain ones obviously I can’t. Every other one; fair game for the cold shoulder, the quizzical look why I don’t hold open the door; and the fanciful tears when I see them fall on the ice in the parking lot and I turn away laughing like I would at a guy. A guy falling would very likely laugh; those women did not!
Oh well; they would throw a party if I was thrown in prison so I can’t care that much.
Figures you morons would eat this shit up without realizing it’s a mocking tribute to your self-obsession. Cookies aren’t usually made with yeast, they rise just fine on their own. Like women. No Y-factor needed.
Ok, one thing – cookies are not made with yeast. Baking powder! Chemical vs biological leavening. Still, I guess the point of the analogy stands.
“Cookies aren’t usually made with yeast, they rise just fine on their own. Like women. No Y-factor needed.”
Except
as we all know
feminism is and always has been dependent on male violence.