Panty Activists

by W.F. Price on December 18, 2012

Looking for anything to stay relevant, feminists are vandalizing store displays with their own underpants to protest sex-positive Victoria’s Secret lingerie that expresses approval of sex.

What’s odd about the protest is that the targeted underpants actually follow feminist ideas of making consent explicit. They display messages such as “unwrap me” and “sure thing,” which, although not particularly sexy, definitely give the go ahead. If a woman has a sign on her underpants that says “f*ck me,” she’s making a very positive statement of consent, provided she took off her pants or dress herself. So what’s the problem?

It seems that feminists actually resent the idea of consent, despite wanting men to ask for it. Consent (actually, it’s really assent in this case — feminists don’t understand the language that well) is something women don’t like to make explicit. There’s something unattractive about loudly proclaiming a desire to have sex before the act has even begun.

So feminists, never to be outdone, came up with their own slogans, which are essentially sex negative. They display messages such as “no means no,” “I’ll let you know when I’m ready” and “ask first!” — total mood killers. The most obnoxious of all says “LISTEN to what I want.” If I were a young man and I saw those messages on a woman’s underpants, I’d just tell her to put her pants on and leave. However, I doubt any non-moronic woman who wanted to sleep with a man would wear the panties the feminists designed.

As for real rapists, why would they care whether women consent or not? That’s what rape is all about — not caring whether she wants it or not. For those guys, signs on panties don’t matter a bit.

{ 43 comments… read them below or add one }

X December 18, 2012 at 13:51

Welmer-””The most obnoxious of all says “LISTEN to what I want.” If I were a young man and I saw those messages on a woman’s underpants, I’d just tell her to put her pants on and leave.””

How so cruel of you Welmer.

Don’t you know that even ugly girls want to fuck ?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anti Idiocy December 18, 2012 at 14:12

“I doubt any non-moronic woman who wanted to sleep with a man would wear the panties the feminists designed.”

Actually, many of them would wear Victoria’s Secrets panties.

Feminists are bat shit fucking crazy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Anonymous December 18, 2012 at 14:25

They display messages such as “no means no,” “I’ll let you know when I’m ready” and “ask first!” — total mood killers. The most obnoxious of all says “LISTEN to what I want.”

If you don’t want sex, keep your pants on and they’ll never see what your ass is selling.

I agree with AI – they are absolutely insane.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Opus December 18, 2012 at 14:29

Here is the contradiction: If a woman tells me: ‘Opus I want you to do it to me now, and just as I direct’ my instinct is to run away. If however I seduce, I run the risk of being accused of going too far – of being a redefined Rapist. Even Montaigne, I noticed recently, thought that some women would at some point enjoy being ‘Raped’ – his word.

I read somewhere that in communication, 55% thereof is body language, 38% tone of voice, and a mere 7% the actual words used. It is what the much maligned (by the English Judiciary – they called him a mysogynist) calls the Tyranny of Ambiguity. I suggest that he is far more observant as to female behaviour than the any bench comprising The Court of Appeal

Your Feminists in their litteralness reveal that they are not over-intelligent: the White-knights even less so.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Opus December 18, 2012 at 14:31

Sorry – the name of the ‘mysogynist’ is Simon Sheppard.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader December 18, 2012 at 15:35

Newsflash – “Feminists Demand Fried Ice, Shit Test Men”…video at 11:00.

SSDD.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rapscallion December 18, 2012 at 15:37

talk about getting their panties all in a twist :P

but seriously, the outraged proponents of feminism never fail to astound me in their perplexing confusion about what is is they want. ” FUCK YOU, patriarchy, it’s my hot body, I’ll do as I please!”… “No, patriarchy come baaaaaaaaaack!”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Anon7 December 18, 2012 at 16:05

If I didn’t know any better, I’d say that the women who created the ideological foundations of Feminism were women who did not want anything to do with sex with men; post-menopausal spinsters, lesbians, women whose hormonal balance led them to need careers in academia and business.

But that can’t be right, can it?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer December 18, 2012 at 16:24

ForeignBride and her damn teen panties have made me a mere shadow of my former self.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Lyn87 December 18, 2012 at 16:27

Just so I understand this: by the time she’s modeling her latest purchase from Victoria’s Secret for you isn’t the “Yes” already pretty clear?

Basically, these whack-a-doodles made frilly undies with a “Stop” sign to counteract the message that women send when they convey their assent to sex by displaying their bodies in sexy lingerie.

That makes about as much sense as a Burkha with “Do Me, Big Boy” stenciled on it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Anti Idiocy December 18, 2012 at 17:10

“ForeignBride and her damn teen panties have made me a mere shadow of my former self.”

You da man!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
highwasp December 18, 2012 at 17:11

don’t want to derail the thread but I was just watching the news and of course the recent shooting is all over the screen… gun control specific to ‘domestic abusers’, felons and mentally ill is on the table. Whaddya bet this is another way of taking guns from men… and conversely – more women encouraged to carry concealed (heroic school teachers, heroic single mothers, single professional women, working mothers, any woman who does not have a disposable male at hand…) so that the terrible, crazy and convicted men can be better defended against. Get ready for it. Women legally entitled and encouraged to carry concealed so as to defend themselves, the children and society against bad men.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Norm December 18, 2012 at 17:29

Feminists should only be allowed to wear granny panties. They are losing their effect so feministas have to protest at universities and clothing stores to get attention.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Anti Idiocy December 18, 2012 at 17:52

OT.

I just received this email from Warren Farrell. I’m guessing he won’t mind me passing it on. Price and others might find the video heartening.

“This, a documentary on divorced fathers called ‘Broken’, is excellent. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxNRtObt8no) It’s some touching interviews with divorced dads. I know the fathers with whom you work will feel less lonely and isolated as they see this. The documentarian, Steve Brulé, has submitted this to a Canadian film festival. Brulé interviewed me in my capacity as the author of Father and Child Reunion and my experience doing expert witness work for dads. Feel free to make this available as a holiday present to the dads you are helping.”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
oddsock December 18, 2012 at 18:00

Lyn87

“That makes about as much sense as a Burkha with “Do Me, Big Boy” stenciled on it.”

Now that made me grin like I had just had a major bong hit !

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Ajax Murgatroyd December 18, 2012 at 18:07

Sometime in the mid-90s — and long before I took the red pill — I figured out, all by myself, that unless a woman gives you an unequivocal “yes,” she actually means “no.” Further, even if she does give you an unequivocal “yes,” at least half the time she means “no” and is trying to buy enough time to figure out a way to change her mind without losing whatever it is she’s got you on the hook for in the first place.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Wilson December 18, 2012 at 18:07

Gun control definitely targets men the civilization they built, highswap, but feminist leftists will always be against private gun ownership–too phallic, too much individual responsibility. Female victimhood is more powerful than a .50 cal machine gun.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
3DShooter December 18, 2012 at 18:37

@Anti Idiocy

Thanks for posting that link – that is the reality when when kangaroo family kourt predators routinely violate the family (men like the-spearhead.com’s local barrister). And some wonder why I would gladly see them hanged . . . Gee, I wonder why . . .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
NWOslave December 18, 2012 at 18:38

The entire western world has become a parody of surrealism. What’s next? Just because we’re in the middle of having sex doesn’t mean yes.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
3DShooter December 18, 2012 at 18:56

@Opus

“If however I seduce, I run the risk of being accused of going too far – of being a redefined Rapist.”

And just how many of these women have you defended barrister? I’d like to know. Can’t remember? Not surprised, you don’t remember how many men’s live’s you’ve destroyed in your kangaroo family kourts either (or more likely you won’t admit to the scope of your acts, the coward’s way out) . . .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
joeb December 18, 2012 at 19:26

This all goes back to the Bra thing , Since a man invented the Bra its evil .The Victoria secretes shop in its self is not for the Feminist . Its for women that have a desire to please there partner with some sort of Sexy outfit .
I myself have never worn any of the panties or underwear in the shop being a 270 lbs Male so what would I know about how it makes me feel .
But , There is a real fine feeling women get from showing herself to her loving partner with those undergarments on . This feeling unbenounced to the every day whitey tighty Feminist is rewarding , I here .
So my question would be as for restrictive . Who is more restrictive Feminists that would take that feeling of Joy from The Buyer of such merchandise or the guy who invented the product that has given so much Joy .
This brings up visions of Nazi feminist whipping little girls for wanting pretty things like barbie clothing or Pink Jammies . So who is the repressor of Female rights in this case .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
joeb December 18, 2012 at 20:19

Anti Idiocy
This video Brings back memories of a vary painful time in my Life . When children were kidnapped by the state . Over time My harsh feeling of anger has dissipated but, The scars remain .
It gives the impression that time will heal . But the truth is I broke my leg once ,I can’t really remember how it felt but, I know I never want it to happen again .
Its the same with that period of time ,I can’t remember the pain in its fullness but, I still remember the act. My thoughts are always of what was lost , The time with my Children . I can’t get that back . And the pain I can’t remove from There lives due to the abuse of the men that entered there home .
I said before My children where Kidnaped and tortured by my Ex’s crack dealing Boyfriend . My ex spent Time in prison for dealing Crack and the Courts still gave her guardianship .
I wish now that I had Killed them , Because simply time has made me Old and less able .
It became obvious the court were acting in its self interest ,Not my children’s . Its about slavery simple and true . I don’t think its getting better , I would say the more accustomed these Courts get to influx of money the more greed will build .
We don’t know the answer but, Most of us know its not going to be simple or non-violent . History tells us slavery only ends with force .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
highwasp December 18, 2012 at 21:36

you could be writing about me too joeb – I went through similar trauma and am still uncovering layers of long term post traumatic stress disorders… to this day, twenty years later!

OT: still dwelling on the shootings… to what extent did the shooter’s mom and female teachers have in motivating his actions? what if the shooter is the victim? what if more evidence or strong implications of the women using their authority to manipulate a mentally unstable young man comes out? ~ what they couldn’t plan on and didn’t intend was how totally berserk the young man went… and his choice of targets was a complete and lethal surprise… Of course it’s not actually paranoia if ‘they’ really are out to get you, is it?. And ‘they’ being feminists, well, they really are out to get me!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire December 18, 2012 at 22:02

the truth is that fems just don’t want men having sex with women…. period

the wallflowers don’t want you having sex with hot women and the lesbians don’t either (albeit for somewhat different reasons)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Opus December 19, 2012 at 03:07

I have to agree with 3D Shooter (the only person who has any interest in my legal career – for which I must be grateful), I really have forgotten how many women I have defended and for what – sometimes even successfully; it tends to go with the territory. The trick of course is to present them as deserving of sympathy – most Judges are suckers for that.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Bill December 19, 2012 at 05:04

The ironic thing is that the sexual liberation of the 60 and 70 was supposed about breaking free that women are only sex objects and giving them the choice who to have sex with and to enjoy it. Here you clearly see the intent behind it. Hardcore feminists will always hate sex because they think it degrades women. The problem is that the only thing women have to offer men is reproduction (sex). If women did not provide sex, I can gaurentee men would not even give a fuck about women.

We are starting to see mgtow especially younger guys because they realize they can get more action and enjoyment through game. The old saying “why buy the cow if you can get the milk for free?” really is true. Women hate to admit that they only value they can bring to men is when they are different from them. That means being feminine. If they are not then they have no worth as relationship material.

Anyway of course these old hags hate Victoria secrect, because they know that they will never look like those models and since their sexual market value is usually gone, then what value do they have to men.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
oddsock December 19, 2012 at 05:06

Anti Idiocy, joeb Highwasp et al.

Yes I know exactly what you mean. The rage I felt when her and my own lawyers told me that despite her lifestyle/living conditions and crazy behaviour all she had to do was tell the judge she would agree to sort herself out and the kids would be removed from my care in given back to her.

Thankfully she never agreed to such a thing and two of my kids remained with me until leaving school. However, she thought nothing of turning up at my house every year or so to ” kick off ” and make threats scream and shout etc etc and all the police would do is threaten to arrest me if I reacted and eventually moved her on. This went on right up until the kids moved out. I even had the kids teachers phone me at work saying she had turned up at school saying she was going to take them out for the day. This happened every year or two and there was never any contact in between. She would just do this out of the blue.

I still have the same PTSD many many years later. The rage/anger has gone but the memory still remains but here is the weird thing. Although many years on , by chance, I had the occasion to actually meet her. She is one hell of a mess and I didn’t even feel any anger or the need to gloat at her condition. The part that really made my shit itch was the way in which she spoke to me as if nothing had ever happened as if we were old friends or something.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
JudgyBitch December 19, 2012 at 05:21

“LISTEN to what I want”.

I WANT you to shovel the driveway. Then I will give the term “snowblower” a whole new meaning.

Hahahahaaa! Yeah, I need some of those panties.

In truth, I think those panties express a very real truth that feminism lies to women about: a woman’s body and hormones are designed to become emotionally attached to the men she has sex with. She wants a man to love her. But her mind KNOWS that randomly fucking some dude isn’t going to result in love. Few men love sluts. So women are in a state of constant confusion. They will get down to their panties, their bodies flooded with oxytocin and wanting so much to bond and to mean something to the man in front of them, but they know that behaving like a whore is exactly the wrong way to encourage any man to love them.

And of course, men are supposed to know exactly what she is thinking at all times, irrespective of her behaviour.

Ultimately, those panties are a way of saying “men are responsible for women’s beahviour”. It’s an attempt to pass the responsibility onto the man.

Here’s a clue, ladies: if you DON’T want to fuck some guy you don’t love, keep your fucking clothes on and try building a relationship. That will require you to bring something to the table other than your vagina. You will need to be pleasant and kind and cheerful and nice (just like when you establish any OTHER kind of relationship), and there’s the problem.

Women WANT men to love them, but they don’t want to BE lovable. And that just isn’t going to work.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
brigadon December 19, 2012 at 06:46

essentially feminists are desperate to increase their flagging numbers. More and more people are waking up to their crap, and now they are turning to commercialism techniques to try and replace the majority that they are losing.
Few things are as hilarious as watching a fatbeard bull dyke bitching about how all the ‘hot girls’ are getting ‘stolen by men’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Anonymous December 19, 2012 at 07:31

It is easier to secretly leave your underwear in a public place than to donate time or money to save women from Islam, a real-life rape culture. Cliterectomies, public flogging, honor killings, acid attacks on school girls, sexual slavery – no, the priority here is underwear with the wrong words on them. Mustn’t offend the Muslims… mustn’t offend the Muslims…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous age 70 December 19, 2012 at 08:07

>>Further, even if she does give you an unequivocal “yes,” at least half the time she means “no” and is trying to buy enough time to figure out a way to change her mind without losing whatever it is she’s got you on the hook for in the first place.

Brilliant, good one, Ajax.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
keyster December 19, 2012 at 09:10

If they had their way Victoria’s Secret would sell chastity belts with females holding the key until a written agreement of consent was signed and notarized. It would be called the “Wait! I’m not sure I want to do this yet.” panty.

And we wonder why Cialis is so popular.
Your dick will get hard when SHE’S ready.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
joeb December 19, 2012 at 11:29

I think the argument as the feminist see it : is more about young people ,protecting the teens from unwanted ,Life changing pregnancies is a good idea .
All there argument tend to back spin to teen pregnancy . That’s the 800lbs gorilla in the room . When its said in a ambiguous manner by a fat older women it sounds stupid .
Explaining there logic , is something they are not good at . They expect people to know what they are talking about . A logic built on a platform of 40 or so steps .Is like trying to explain the distance from here to the Closest star to a five year old by saying fairies will fly us there .
These women are processed for years with brainwashing . This logic is not understood by me or even the Girl that sells donuts at the coffee shop .
A leap of faith always proceeds the lie .My ex started talking crazy stuff like that right before her exit from reality . I had some female walk into a store the other day and say to me , “That’s funny I have lost my power > expecting me to know what she was talking about .
Being well briefed on feminist bull I know she was caught in my headlights , But the store owner looked at her like she was crazy .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Strong Man December 19, 2012 at 12:36

This is outrageous. First get married, then have sex. And don’t show your panties to anyone you don’t want to have sex with.

In which romance novel does the hero verbally ask, can I have sex with you?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Suffertone December 19, 2012 at 14:50

“unwrap me”
Sounds like an order. “LISTEN to what I want”, she said. Don’t complain if he does.

“sure thing”
Sounds like an answer to a question. “Ask first!”, she said. He did, she answered.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Szebran December 19, 2012 at 17:16

They protest Victoria’s Secret lingerie yet they sponsor Slut Walks. Feminist really are screwed up women.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
woggy December 20, 2012 at 17:36

We know one thing.
The undies in the picture – drab in their cut and pedantic in their message as they might be – certainly are nothing that would fit the harpies that put them there.

Their own underpants could cover a gas grill for winter.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Huck Finn December 20, 2012 at 18:15

How about feminist slogans put on panties with the front phrase “rape free zone”? In the case of a real rapist do feminist imagine that would work any better than “gun free zone”?

A men’s line of undershorts with messages needs to be launched. Here is one message for the woman to see before they strip down the man: “Not responsible for your pregnancy”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Gamerp4 December 21, 2012 at 00:57

Wow, Sure thing the crazies are losing it, Is this really about equality? Do i see ANY equality in this? Was feminism always about EKKKKUALITY? Forgive me to wrap all this but I don’t think that throwing away all the clothes and just wearing a panty that says “No Means No”, “LISTEN to what i want” or “ask first” will not be consensual sex I MEAN WTF, Are all feminist brain damaged, are they so much into BS that they eat shit for living.

I Don’t have an IQ level of their standards so i can’t argue on the fact why would they protest about it and call it rape culture, after all wasn’t the feminist who fought for sexual revolution and supported slut walks around the western hemisphere, Sorry but i don’t grasp that, you just simply have to say STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM WESTERN WOMEN YOU MALE ASSHOLES, YOU SEXIST, CHAUVINISTIC WESTERN MALE BUMPS. See that might work, Next time write those words so that we would truly know what your intentions are, after all we don’t pass the IQ level of the modern women who are leading the universities and colleges.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Xenoglossy December 21, 2012 at 16:23

Protip for men: If you cannot tell the difference between when a woman is enjoying and consenting to the sex and when you are behaving in a way that will make her feel as if she was violated when you are finished, YOU might actually be the problem.

Guess what, millions and millions of men all around the world manage to engage in great heterosexual intercourse without making their partner feel like complete garbage. The women you’ve had sex with who have seemed reluctant or avoidant have, I promise you, almost certainly had awesome, enthusiastic sex with other men.

Seriously, MOST men don’t spend their entire lives worried that they’ll get accused of rape because, wow, they don’t approach sex with women as a high stakes zero sum game.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
woggy December 23, 2012 at 14:05

@Xenoglossy
“Seriously, MOST men don’t spend their entire lives worried that they’ll get accused of rape because, wow, they don’t approach sex with women as a high stakes zero sum game.”

Maybe you should direct your emphasis at the people who tossed screenprinted undershorts at Victoria’s Secret. Judging by your own statement – “Guess what, millions and millions of men all around the world manage to engage in great heterosexual intercourse without making their partner feel like complete garbage” – it would seem that the painted underwear gang would benefit greatly from hearing your message, because other than (possibly) you, none of them has commented on this article.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
woggy December 23, 2012 at 14:13

more for Xeno
“Protip for men: If you cannot tell the difference between when a woman is enjoying and consenting to the sex and when you are behaving in a way that will make her feel as if she was violated when you are finished, YOU might actually be the problem.”

A simple “yes” or “no” will do – read the undershorts Xeno.
By the way, allowing for a woman to express consent at the beginning and then claiming rape for “feeling violated” after the fact (completely subjective, by the way) is a strange thought to share when trying to convince men that they shouldn’t be concerned about a false rape accusation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
brigadon December 25, 2012 at 00:18

Xenoglossy-
I am sure millions of men around the world have great heterosexual sex and never have to worry about being falsely accused of rape.

The problem is, there are BILLIONS of men. a million of them is one tenth of one percent of a billion.
so basically, the other 999 out of a thousand men DO have to worry about being accused of rape falsely, or getting fucked ‘after the fucked’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: