Feminists Show How They Feel About Free Speech at Warren Farrell Presentation

by W.F. Price on November 19, 2012

Dr. Warren Farrell, who has devoted a great deal of his life to men’s issues and taken feminism to task for its blatant double standards and hatemongering against men, addressed a group seeking men’s equality at the University of Toronto on Friday evening. However, he was delayed by a group of anti-speech feminists and some street trash they picked up who had nothing better to do than fight the police. According to a feminist interviewed after the disturbance, there were about twenty protesters, although other feminists later claimed triple digits online.

Here’s a video of the feminists misbehaving:

Naturally, the cops went easy on the feminists, which is why they do this kind of thing — they can get away with it. If real men got physical with the cops like that instead of a bunch of spoiled college feminists and their gutterpunk buddies, they would have drawn weapons. Kinda makes Warren Farrell’s point, but then again it also makes the point that seeking “equality” with women is a quixotic effort.

However, that isn’t to diminish Farrell’s work. The man has done an effective job in calling attention to the sham that passes for gender equality, laying feminism’s hypocrisy bare to all who care to look. That’s what really infuriates these feminists.

Word to the wise: a lot of the street trash who show up as “muscle” at these protests shoot smack and/or meth and make a living selling their ass, so you probably want to avoid physical contact if you encounter them. If you are ever in a position where you must defend yourself from them (try to avoid it if at all possible), it is far better to use a weapon that can keep them at least at arm’s length than your fist. Both HIV and Hepatitis C are real risks, which is why the cops wear gloves at these events. At about :20-:30 in the video you’ll notice one of the cops putting gloves on before getting close to them.

{ 43 comments… read them below or add one }

C.T. West November 19, 2012 at 08:59

I was there, probably about fifteen feet from where the scene in the video took place. About 100 protesters in total, by my count. About twenty barricading the doorway. I was verbally assaulted by a very unfriendly “peaceful protester.” At least one other person was physically assaulted by them.

The police used the absolutely minimum force necessary to clear the building entrance way. It took more than an hour for enough police to arrive to do this.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Cultural_Expat November 19, 2012 at 09:10

Wish I could attribute this phrase, of which these protesters practised, but I cannot as I cannot recall where I first ran across it. This is a Hall of Fame performance of a Fembot (1/2 feminist, 1/2 robot) Cunning Stunt. All I can say is, whenever possible i will avoid any trips work related or pleasure to Toronto.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Jacko November 19, 2012 at 09:16

Typical Toronto – one of the most decadent and depraved cities on the planet.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer November 19, 2012 at 09:22

Nice job of promoting Dr.Farrel’s work, ladies. With the Patraeus affair receding into the past they have stoked the fires of gender controversy anew and will inspire a thousand blog posts, perhaps a mention in “The Atlantic” or “The New York Times”.

And definitely agree about avoiding getting into altercations for fear of HIV and Hep C. or a trip to the local jail.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Ethical November 19, 2012 at 09:45

All those women so savagely angry and aggressive at anyone even politely questioning feminism . If any of them took the time to listen to Dr. Farrell they’d know he’s almost INHUMANLY compassionate towards women. Dr. Farrell is the GOOD COP. If they want a telephone book style ear beating they should come to the Manosphere where we are DONE speaking softly. But yup that’s Canada … the free speech lovin’ frozen north; in the throes of an ebola-grade variant of the feminism we all know and love.

And the young men (or perhaps butch women?) shown in the video fighting the cops … those squeegee kids who’d be “white knights” if they could only find a laundry to wash their whites in. SO LOST. Sigh.

Thankfully the Manosphere is used to idiocy and will still be forgiving. Those “street trash” might be so eager now to sacrifice themselves in pussy-begging supplication to those snarling feminists. Eventually they’ll come running to the Manosphere holding their bleeding assholes after those unmarriageable feral women have sodomized them in divorce/common-law partnership (which soon won’t offer any protection for men either). When those men have real (and unfortunately for most men very hard) experience, the Manosphere won’t turn those newly wise men away.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
scatmaster November 19, 2012 at 10:04

Another Canadian university shows its true colors on “free speech”.
The University of Ottawa aided by the police banned Ann Coulter from speaking there last year. Say what you want about Ms. Coulter these bastions of socialist hate just cannot help themselves. Another local university Carleton University (Cartoon U) proposed by their Student Council to stop supporting the Cystic Fibrosis campaign because it was not inclusive enough. I kid you not. These people are really sick.

http://oncampus.macleans.ca/education/2010/03/23/coulters-u-of-o-event-canceled/

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/story/2008/11/25/ot-081125-shinerama.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
shmiggen November 19, 2012 at 10:13

In addition to gloves, go out and get vaccinated with gardasil, and twinrix. Better safe than sorry.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
The Trend November 19, 2012 at 10:14

All the MRA’s are asking for is gender equality- the feminists show their true colors by fighting against it- clearly showing they want superior rights.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Opus November 19, 2012 at 10:28

It is always informative to see undergraduates (who presumably seek knowledge) doing their best to prevent its dissemination because it conflicts with their beliefs (i.e. myths). I seem to recall Watson – no less (of Crick and Watson – Double Helix fame) receiving the same treatment in London.

Do I take it that those policeman are fearful of being bitten?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Zimmy November 19, 2012 at 10:37

Disgusting spoiled anti-free speech women always seem to show how they are emotion-driven which seems to be their strong female attribute. Logic and objective thought are their enemies.

If there was a “garden of Eden” it’s easy to imagine that women are the ones who ruined it. The ancients who wrote several versions of how women and their constant self-serving me-isms should have been kept in check. If we find ourselves in a “Mad Max” world, it’s amazing how women will once again become dependent on men. They have always depended on men’s resources and ingenuity. They are the parasite gender.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
geographybeefinalisthimself November 19, 2012 at 11:13

Warren Farrell actually has the nerve to expect the men’s rights movement NOT to have woman-bashing with it.

This experience should be an eye-opener to him, but unfortunately, will probably not be one.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
keyster November 19, 2012 at 11:49

At least….AT LEAST….
…Kanuckistan dares to give him a platform from which to speak.

Here in Obamistan he’s persona non grata on every campus of higher education in the land. You’d have a better chance of David Duke or Rush Limbaugh being invited. And Warren Farrell is one of the nicest guys you’d ever want to meet, (but then so are David Duke and Rush Limbaugh for that matter.)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Born Free November 19, 2012 at 12:01

BTW, it’s International Men’s Day today! But did you also know that it’s been made World Toilet Day. What a coincidence.

According to CNN.com:

“This World Toilet Day, international aid agencies are highlighting the particular risks to women of poor access to toilets. WaterAid says women are most vulnerable because they’re not only exposed to disease, but also have additional shame, harassment and risk of attack when they go out in the open.It’s also hard for grown-up girls because of the risk of sexual attack,” Ajara said.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Dermanus November 19, 2012 at 13:05

I was there, and it is difficult to say how many were protesters and how many were people waiting to get in. There were 10-12 people blocking the doors. Any time anybody approached wanting to get in they would accuse them being being rapists, pervents and/or rape apologists.

They were clearly trying to provoke a fight.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Szebran November 19, 2012 at 13:09

Feminism is at its core a totalitarian ideology of oppression. They see men as servants to women.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Norm November 19, 2012 at 13:31

Nice post again. Toronto is one of the most liberal cities in N.A., has the 2nd or 3rd largest homosexual population in the Americas.
Very left wing area. Not surprised they don’t want free speech. The Ontario Marxist(teacher’s) union did a number on these college students when they went through the indoctornation system. Even Anne Coulter in Ottawa at Carleton University for the first time in her life had to cancel an appearance.
As for the street trash, these must be the protestor’s “boytoys”. You know the kind some women like in their 20s, but will never be able to provide for them when they are older. Alpha male indeed!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Feminist_Nullificationist November 19, 2012 at 13:40

Comments are closed and it looks like the removed this response I posted:

“Feminism has a long history of misandry as shown in the video, “Los Misandry” at Youtube. The result of decades of feminist lies and propaganda has been an institutionalization of misandry, leading to a witch-hunting of males as shown in the video “Witch-Hunting Males” at Youtube. :-/”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader November 19, 2012 at 15:09

Feminism, being a branch of Marxism, is only in favor of speech that agrees with Feminism. Speech in opposition is bad. The Bolsheviks were in favor of free speech until their coup d’etat was complete, and immediately they made “anti-revolutionary propaganda” a crime. The same thing happens any time any Left-wing group gains power: free speech becomes a danger, it becomes hazardous and anti-social, and that cannot be allowed.

I’ve experienced a milder version of this myself, a few times, and it was such personal experiences that first led me to question the axioms of feminism. It was Game that made clear many of my past experiences.

Oh, and isn’t it interesting that strong, independent, proud, capable young wimmenz have to bring street thugs in to do their dirty work? It’s a different form of White Knighting, to be sure, but that is what it is.

Kudos to the Canucks for letting Farrell speak. As Keyster pointed out, that’s more than just about any US college would do. But there’s always space for the hateful V-monologues…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer November 19, 2012 at 15:22

Do they still have all-nude strip clubs in Toronto?

Not sure about your town but I am asking “What Has Happened to Our Strip Clubs?”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
El Bastardo November 19, 2012 at 15:47

It is amazing that they only arrested the guy, a beta orbiter I imagine trying to earn “pu55Y points” so he can get a one time pass; wasting his time I know.

Too bad he is not hanging out with many of us so he can learn how to have the girl pay him for it.

Oh well, he will learn; and then come running here.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
V10 November 19, 2012 at 15:54

College and university students are amongst the most insufferable people on the planet, at least the dedicated activists who typically float through majoring in various fluff Grievances Studies. And as obtuse as I found the lefties during my years on campus in the 90s, it sounds like it’s only gotten worse since. The phrase “They can’t possibly be THAT ignorant, could they?” gets repeated so often in your mind that it loses all meaning.

That being said, I always got a kick out of arguing with the lefties (can really only be done in very small groups or in a structured classroom, or you’ll be shouted down by the chorus of “4 legs good, 2 legs bad”).

You know, I can’t help but wonder if the influence of hipster culture (that heavily overlaps the activist culture) doesn’t explain some of the contradictions. Hipsters are big on irony, and you can’t get much more ironic than acting like little proto-fascist thugs in order to ‘defend free speech’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader November 19, 2012 at 15:55

Ethical

Thankfully the Manosphere is used to idiocy and will still be forgiving.

Speak for yourself, not for the rest of us. Justice first, then reconciliation.

Maybe.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Avenger November 19, 2012 at 16:44

BTW, it’s International Men’s Day today!

Bad choice. The problem with men is that they have a bad strategy.

I’ve made Dec 25th men’s day.It’s a national holiday anyway and we’ll just appropriate it like the Jesus followers took it from the “pagans”.

And shutdown all feminist and female activities on or off campus. Don’t permit them to speak or demonstrate.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Eric November 19, 2012 at 16:56

The last paragraph was totally uncalled for.
No self respecting junkie or tweaker would waste their valuable time doing the dirty work for a bunch of upper middle class career feminists. They’re too busy either trying to scrounge up enough cash to pay for their next fix, or enjoying their next fix (both of which are far more noble endeavors IMHO).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Avenger November 19, 2012 at 17:09

Yes Eric you’re right. No opiate user would even bother with them because he’d be afraid of going to jail and even for 1 day would become ill without drugs. Meth heads might though, they’re crazy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Ethical November 19, 2012 at 17:13

Anonymous Reader said:

Ethical

“Thankfully the Manosphere is used to idiocy and will still be forgiving”.

Speak for yourself, not for the rest of us. Justice first, then reconciliation.

Maybe.

@Anonymous Reader:
I don’t speak for anyone. I observe what I see to be the truth to expose feminism in whatever way I can. You’re welcome to start policing entry into the Manosphere, but as of now there remains no entry criteria. Furthermore the idea of starting a column of thought police to eradicate former manginas and whiteknights from the manosphere isn’t entirely practical if one stops to think about it for long. In fact to free such people is exactly why the Manosphere offers the “red pill” to all who come to it. Rampant, oppressive feminist censorship ensures all of us grow up awash in feminism’s lies. Sure some guzzle it down harder than others, but stealing words from the Matrix … except for the few chosen ones we were ALL born into “the world pulled over our eyes to blind us from the truth”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American November 19, 2012 at 17:14

White gender-Raunch are going to continue “Empowering” themselves by the perversions and “manufactured statistics” they have asked American law enforcement to construct for them.
For example, every protocol perversion and semantics game that American law enforcement engage in to hide womens violence and arrest an innocent man, “manufactures” a erroneous or “perverted” statistic. Gender-Raunch then use these perverted (or manufactured) statistics to Inflame their way to Empowerment on campuses around the country.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Steve_85 November 19, 2012 at 21:05

I hate to be the guy who brings it up, but…

Maybe handing out a few arse-whoopins to these clowns would be a good way to lessen their boldness? They’re all brave blocking the door because they’re confident that no one will touch them. Perhaps if a few of them do get touched, they might realise that they actually don’t have an invisible shield protecting them… they are safe only because the people they are harassing don’t want to deal with the police.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader November 19, 2012 at 22:28

Ethical
I don’t speak for anyone.

But previously Ethical said:

“Thankfully the Manosphere…

And therefore Ethical claimed to speak for me and many other men, in fact Ethical claimed to speak for all men on all blogs in the entire androsphere.

Ethical: Speak for yourself. Don’t try to speak for me, or any other man.

Clear?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader November 19, 2012 at 22:32

Steve_85

Maybe handing out a few arse-whoopins to these clowns would be a good way to lessen their boldness?

The White Knights would love that. Especially the ones in uniform. So, ‘scuse me, I don’t think so.

Might consider vomiting on them, though. “Sorry – must have been something I ate”. Doubt many of the skanks would stand up to that.
Perfect excuse for any White Knights, too, “Man, I’m sick! Lemme get inside to the bathroom!”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
gwallan November 20, 2012 at 01:59

Dermanus said…

I was there, and it is difficult to say how many were protesters and how many were people waiting to get in. There were 10-12 people blocking the doors. Any time anybody approached wanting to get in they would accuse them being being rapists, pervents and/or rape apologists.

They were clearly trying to provoke a fight.

Odds on they were trying to incite somebody to try to push past them. Any physical contact would result in instant calls of rape.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Ethical November 20, 2012 at 04:34

Anonymous Reader said:

Ethical: Speak for yourself. Don’t try to speak for me, or any other man.

Clear?

@Anonymous Reader:
I guess I’ve been told then son. I believe I was clear in stating I spoke only for myself in observing what I see as the truth. But if you have any further orders telling a grown man what he can and cannot say, please feel free to send them on. I’d be happy to listen if it makes you feel more empowered. However you’d earn more respect by using your place at the big boy table to politely voice your disagreements with grown up words. Of course if men speaking freely is so upsetting that you’re now standing enraged in a pool of pee, wet panties all in a knot, knees knocking together under your skirt from sheer emotion, then you can always go over to The Good Men Project, or even Jezebel or feministing.com. They have a more protective comment censoring policy that’ll make you feel a little safer. I hope you don’t mind if I don’t respond further on this issue.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Bosola November 20, 2012 at 05:39

Hey, this is off topic but found some interesting news:
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/sexism-stops-fathers-from-seeing-children.19466731

So some recognition of the anti-male bias in social workers (in Scotland).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Reality November 20, 2012 at 11:14

You know *I* used to be a flaming liberal when I was in my 20s. Now I’m 49. It’s a good chance that all of these guys will grow up to one day. It’s virtually impossible to be male and feminist and over the age of 35.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Joe November 20, 2012 at 14:18

Here’s my rant………

As a typical apologetic Canadian I must apologize deeply for the appalling behavior of my fellow Canadians last weekend in Toronto. The terrorist behavior proved to the world that Canada is plagued by violent intolerant bigoted criminals like Hitler’s brown shirts..

Please forgive me for the length of this note as I attempt to wrap my head around this complex and draconian issue. Misandry is fairly new to me. Upon discovering this issue my conscious and lack of knowledge compelled me to research misandry further.

What I have found is that misandry forms the central pillar of Canadian social control programs (SCPs). I compared SCPs from other countries to ours. The strongest comparison was Hitler’s SCP of anti-Semitism as is described in his book Mein Kampf, My Struggle, in which he dehumanizes the targets of his SCP.

The inflammatory labels Hitler brands the future human sacrifices of his SCP, Jews in this case, are virtually identical to the language use by misandrists in Canada. Use of such language is deemed as hate crimes in Canada. That is unless it is used against men like it was used against Jews in Germany in a strategy to demonize, dehumanize and persecute like animals.

Based on historical comparisons, such as with the Soviet Union’s Gulags and Canadian aboriginal residential school SCPs, it seems that the fate of current Canadian SCP victims is likely to get a lot worse before it gets better.

Misandrists in Canada take pride in being labeled as Nazis as this acknowledges their status of absolute power in Canadian society along with commensurate state funding and privileges.

A litany of wrongfully accused cases involving men, like David Milgaard, and virtually none involving women, plagues our entirely corrupt Kleptocratic Canadian criminal justice system. The hate propaganda spewed by misandrists in Canada mirrors Hitler’s view that “I see no reason why man should not be as cruel to man as nature is”.

Nothing in Canada describes the criminal justice system as clearly as this quotation. Men are routinely wrongfully accused and the innocents are knowingly subjected to human atrocities in our criminal justice system. These usually mild mannered meek innocents are routinely beaten, raped, etc. at the behest of the system.

Studies have proven that sex accusations against men are false anywhere from 25% to 75% of the time. An exploding industry is the growth of the wrongly accused business. Lawyers and groups address the justice system’s widespread atrocities that are blatant, extreme, and fraudulent and fabrications of fictional crimes. These state based frauds are created to feed a steady supply of innocent victims into the system in order to steal increasingly large amounts of government cash to benefit the criminal justice system cronies. This occurs at a time when statistics prove that crime is declining significantly.

Misandry corruption has led to the establishment of a well-entrenched Canadian kleptocracy for feminist special interest groups and other misandrists funded and/or enabled by the state such as the criminal justice system. Kleptocracy, “rule by thieves”, is a form of political and government corruption where the government exists to increase the personal wealth and political power of its officials and the ruling class at the expense of the wider population, often without pretense of honest service.

Those who attacked Warren’s presentation in Toronto last weekend were state sponsored terrorists for whom truth is completely irrelevant. Promulgating male truths by Warren, no matter how unassociated with misandry and feminism, may eventually compromise the misandrist’s Kleptocratic status and benefits. Many sex charges related cases are fabricated and kleptocratic as Milgaard found where crown witnesses were paid to lie.

I would be surprised to hear anything other than that the authorities such as the university, government special interest funding departments, criminal justice system, etc., all condoned and enabled the behavior to date by ensuring that their terrorist acts go consequence free. So far my suspicions have been confirmed.

My grandparents left Europe after WW1 because they believed that those in charge would make war all over again in their lifetime. Sadly, they were correct. By those in charge they meant the wealthy and powerful that created Hitler.

Gramps meant the supporters and creators of Hitler such as the Henry Fords, DuPont’s, Krupp’s, JP Getty’s, IBMs, King of England, etc., to whom Hitler gave the highest possible state recognition for creating and supporting him and Nazism. My gramps believed that war was highly profitable for such people who were personally responsible for the war crimes. The same applies in our current Canadian society with regards to the obvious links between misandry SCPs and Kleptocracy.

In terms of explaining why our Canadian society has embraced misandry en masse, I found understanding from the book: On fighting, killing, and dying : the secret World War II transcripts of German POWs by author Neitzel, Sönke. This explains how Germany’s normal families, friends, neighbors, coworkers, etc. became blood thirsty zombie butchers as a result of Hitler’s SCPs. Canada has adopted the same SCPs standard with misandry replacing anti-Semitism and anti-anyone not Aryan. At this point I have read a summary of this book and hope to read it all when it becomes available from the local library.

The psychotic violent mob at Warren’s presentation is the same ilk as the German brown shirt gangs attacking Jews and anyone else that may be any threat, or just propose a different view, to Hitler’s sadistic values which have the same dehumanizing aspects of our kleptocracy’s misandry values.

“Those who don’t know history are destined to repeat it.”Edmund Burke

“The spectacle (McCarthyism) is one we would expect in a totalitarian nation where the rights of the individual are crushed beneath the juggernaut of statism and oppression; it has no place in America where government exists to serve people, not to destroy them” President Harry S. Truman.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Gilgamesh November 20, 2012 at 20:26

Guys like warren Farrell and Paul Elam have their place, namely giving us the chance to say “we did it your way, it didn’t work, you know what we have to do now…”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous Reader November 21, 2012 at 19:57

I stated to Ethical: Speak for yourself. Don’t try to speak for me, or any other man.

Clear?

And now, a temper tantrum from “Ethical”:
@Anonymous Reader:
I guess I’ve been told then son.

Ethical, this is a basic concept that most men learn before they are old enough to vote. Some of us learned it before we could shave. Why such a basic thing is offensive to Ethical is not clear, nor is it interesting.

Yes, Ethical, you have been told. I expect you to remember. Clear?

I believe I was clear in stating I spoke only for myself in observing what I see as the truth.

Ethical, you can believe what you want. You are entitled to your own beliefs. But you are not entitled to your own facts, and the facts are plain: you arrogantly claimed to speak for all men. Now, instead of simply taking this fact to heart, we see this childish temper tantrum.

Grow up.

But if you have any further orders telling a grown man what he can and cannot say, please feel free to send them on. I’d be happy to listen if it makes you feel more empowered. However you’d earn more respect by using your place at the big boy table to politely voice your disagreements with grown up words. Of course if men speaking freely is so upsetting that you’re now standing enraged in a pool of pee, wet panties all in a knot, knees knocking together under your skirt from sheer emotion, then you can always go over to The Good Men Project, or even Jezebel or feministing.com. They have a more protective comment censoring policy that’ll make you feel a little safer.

My objections to the childish nonsense and adolescent posturing of Ethical have been clear. Ethical’s feeble attempt at a flame above merely underscores my point. A man would either admit error and get on with his life, or offer a logical counter argument. A man would not choose to post a puerile passive-aggressive pile of drivel such as this.

I have no doubt Ethical knows a great deal about editorial policy at the Good Mangina Project – perhaps Ethical is involved in setting that policy, or enforcing that policy on comments? It would not be a surprise, given the “Men are sitting by the doggy door, with our leashes in our mouths, waiting for Woman to return” position made clear in a previous posting by Ethical.

I hope you don’t mind if I don’t respond further on this issue.

Since the only logical alternative to intelligence is silence, that choice is clearly a wise one. Good idea.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
imnobody November 22, 2012 at 16:41

How sad. I have a great admiration for Dr. Farrell. His book “Why men are the way they are” opened my eyes more than any other men’s rights book did. It is full of “Yes” moments when you realize the injustice against men. It was very touching to read it.

I know he was wrong in some things but he was hugely enlightening.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
criolle johnny November 23, 2012 at 19:32

Listen to the video …
“Off OUR campus”.
Education, particularly higher education belongs to feminists.
It’s about power and control. When an alternate voice, like Farrell’s is heard, it presents a threat to that power and control.
This is not to be tolerated.
What you heard and saw in that video is called “Liberal Debate”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Steve P November 24, 2012 at 10:01

“No hate speech on campus”, the feminists chant. The only hate I see is coming from them.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rapscallion November 26, 2012 at 09:08

many leftist ‘revolutionary’ types live in a whole alternate universe. I would imagine that the police and UofT administration are also deemed to be equally oppressive enemies to the cause. And possibly all or any straight white males in the vicinity who are still in proud possession of their balls.

And as is well known, the ‘hate speech’ laws in Canada are far more akin to European legislation than the USA. there are some things that are downright illegal to say or reproduce. I wonder if the event organizers will be named and shamed, perhaps even dragged out before a human rights tribunal for their uncouth political perspectives? If the feminist protesters lodge a complaint, it could well happen. crazier things have occurred.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Prof. Woland November 27, 2012 at 09:00

Feminists have no antidote for the modern Men’s Rights Movement. This is something that clearly makes them very afraid and twitchy which is why they react as such. If they cannot stop men from making their point in the first place, they have basically lost. So what they do is put up a very rigid outer defense and hope nothing breaks through.

There are two big reasons for this. The first is that when men become organized and develop their own advocacy groups it becomes much harder for feminists to use their natural weapon of choice, ad hominem and shaming attacks, to repress the unwelcome messages. This works on individuals who are afraid of being singled out for the opprobrium that gets heaped on them and are naturally nervous of the repercussions in the form of law suits, job firings, and the like. Someone like Warren Farrell can no longer be assailed in such a fashion so he has to be stopped at all costs. The second and even greater fear feminist have about men organizing is that it opens the door to men having access to the mass media. Once this occurs, they will completely bypass the like of these thugs in Toronto and be able to take their message direct to whoever is willing to listen. This will forever destroy feminism’s monopoly on the public discourse and give them a butt whipping they won’t soon forget.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Human-Stupidity.com November 27, 2012 at 16:56

Very sad indeed.

Less famous speakers could not command dozens of police to clear the space for their speech. A locak researcher holding a weekly seminar could not get police to protect them on a weekly basis.

So such feminist anti-speech hate is part of the concerted effort to shut up all non-feminist speech.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: