Feminists: The Kissing Sailor was Committing Sexual Assault

by W.F. Price on October 4, 2012

I’m sure pretty much every American over the age of 12 or so has seen the iconic WWII photograph that depicts a sailor kissing a woman on VJ day. Well, I’ve got bad news for you: the guy was a sex predator. That’s right, you weren’t seeing an act of jubilation in the joy of victory, but a lecherous thug kissing an unsuspecting woman in a surprise attack. What gave this cretin license to do this? Why, rape culture, of course…

A few facts have come to light. Far from being a kiss between a loving couple, we learn that George and Greta were perfect strangers. We learn that George was drunk, and that Greta had no idea of his presence, until she was in his arms, with his lips on hers.

[...]

…what George had committed was sexual assault. Yet, in an amazing feat of willful blindness, none of the articles comment on this, even as they reproduce Greta’s words for us. Without a single acknowledgement of the problematic nature of the photo that her comments reveal, they continue to talk about the picture in a whimsical, reverent manner, “still mesmerized by his timeless kiss.” George’s actions are romanticized and glorified; it is almost as if Greta had never spoken.

In a way, I understand this. The end of war is a big deal, and the euphoria felt throughout the nation on that day is an important part of American history. For so long, this photograph has come to represent that unbridled elation, capturing the hearts of war veterans and their families alike. The fact that this much-loved photo is a depiction of sexual assault, rather than passion, is an uncomfortable truth, and to call it out as such might make one seem to be a priggish wet blanket. After all, this sailor has risked his life for his country. Surely his relief and excitement at the end of the war is justified? Surely these are unique circumstances? The answer to the first question is yes. He is perfectly entitled to be ecstatic. He is perfectly entitled to celebrate. However, this entitlement does not extend to his impinging on someone else’s bodily autonomy.

Actually, she’s right by today’s standards. The law provides no excuse for this kind of behavior. Today, George would be arrested and court martialed, the Navy sued, and congressional inquiries would be held. We’d hear about “rape culture” in the military for months.

I’d ask why stop there? After all, by today’s standards pretty much every pop star prior to 1990 or so might as well be a rapist. Likewise, Sean Connery would be a batterer, Martin Luther King Jr. abusive, JFK a rapist, Gandhi a wife beater, the list goes on… There are so many illusions to shatter, so many cultural icons to smash, so many great men to lay low. It should keep the feminists busy for a very long time, as they erase every last vestige of patriarchal pride.

I’m not sure older men who came of age before the feminist revolution understand this, even today, and I think that’s one of the reasons they often have a tolerant attitude toward feminism. The hijinks they got away with as young men would now get many of them jailed and labeled as sex predators. Even hippie culture (and perhaps especially hippie culture) would be verboten today. Imagine what would happen if some long-haired freak took to walking around children without clothes on today, talking about “free love” and all the rest.

Yet, for some reason, it’s the young men – who have never had anywhere near the liberty afforded to previous generations of men – who bear the brunt of the “rape culture” penalties. Look at a woman the wrong way, or don’t look at her or pay any attention to her at all, but say something she doesn’t like (doesn’t even have to be sexual), and you could be reported for making her “feel threatened.”

The lesson here is that the more power we concede to the feminists, the worse they treat us. Every time we pass a law they want, they simply escalate their demands. Whenever we give them an advantage, they inevitably complain that much, much more is needed. And the sad thing is that despite bending over backwards to accommodate them, women are a lot less happy than they used to be.

It will never end until someone finally, decisively says “no.” That’s right, no means no. No more concessions.

{ 68 comments… read them below or add one }

Burn October 4, 2012 at 13:53

I saw this BS story earlier today along with another typical feminist piece raving over at Feministing about Shulamith Firestone. You couldn’t be more right.

It continues to amaze me that as time moves on how most of the beacons of early feminism are or were by any objective definition mentally ill. Mary Daly, Andrea Dworkin, Valerie Solanas, Shulamith Firestone et al. It’s unbelievable. Entire organizations constructed on top of lies by crazy bitches. WTF?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Annonymous October 4, 2012 at 13:55

The sex and gender raunch obsessives, whose predominant race I won’t mention, have been compulsively sex-baiting since summer time:

Every day the mass media have run stories of sex crazed maniacs propositioning, raping, abducting and sometimes killing fair white maidens, all of whom were virgins of the highest moral character.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-19830971
Girl jumps into Union Canal to escape sex attacker in Edinburgh

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-19812608
James Bond: How his sex life compares with an average man

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19730639
Justin Lee Collins ‘kept girlfriend’s sexual history

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-19820017
Jimmy Savile: Sussex police confirm 2008 assault claim

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-19835236
A prison nurse has been found guilty of having an affair with a convicted rapist at a high security jail.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/slink/real-life/stories/my-step-dad-abused-me
My mum is a nurse and my dad isn’t around anymore. For ages it was just me, her and my two baby brothers. Then one day she brought a new man into our lives.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-guernsey-19110100
Three men have been found guilty in a Guernsey court of the gang rape of a 22-year-old woman in St Peter Port.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-19812665
A suspected serial sex attacker is being hunted by detectives in connection with a string of assaults on lone women in Southampton

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-19826060
The teacher arrested on suspicion of abducting 15-year-old Sussex schoolgirl Megan Stammers can be extradited, a French court has ruled.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Rebel October 4, 2012 at 14:16

Feminists are addicted to attention. As long as they will get it, they will behave that way. Stop listening and they will shut up.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
MRA October 4, 2012 at 14:21

I’d ask why stop there? After all, by today’s standards pretty much every pop star prior to 1990 or so might as well be a rapist.

Elvis and almost every singer from the same period would be a rapist and pedo today.

groupies are mostly young women especially teen, Elvis and Jhonny Cash had dozen of them.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_6sg4od27dCI/StYzY_N53TI/AAAAAAAAAi0/lh208Ggd7lU/s400/ELVIS+GROUPIES.jpg

Today is not so different, look at Twilight male actor how mush teens girls they parade for a kiss, or Justin Bieber.

http://izismile.com/2010/06/24/twilight_fan_insanity_11_pics.html

You think if Taylor Lautner take a young women a kiss her “against” her will she would try to fight back?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
TFH October 4, 2012 at 14:35

‘Sexual Assault’ = Feminists are not attractive enough that even a sailor on a man-only ship for the last 3 years would want to have anything to do with a feminist….

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
TFH October 4, 2012 at 14:38

The lesson here is that the more power we concede to the feminists, the worse they treat us. Every time we pass a law they want, they simply escalate their demands.

Women are programmed to demand infinite resources, for reasons I explained before.

Before modern times, funneling resources to women correlated to the survival of children. This correlation was tight enough to not question it.

However, now, women just just 10-20% of their lifetime reproduction capacity, but society is still programmed to funnel all resources to women. That 90% of the items we see for sale in a store are geared to women, proves this, as does the fact that 70-80% of all govt. spending is a transfer from men to women.

But eventually, this misallocation will correct. Since funneling resources to women no longer means the survival of children, the malinvestment will not go on forever.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
TFH October 4, 2012 at 14:39

And the sad thing is that despite bending over backwards to accommodate them, women are a lot less happy than they used to be.

The concept of a ‘shit test’ is the most useful thing any man can learn..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
freebird October 4, 2012 at 15:47

The cops and judges love the feminist lawz, it gives them the “right” to enter any home without a warrant,haul a man off without a crime being committed,micromanage children’s behaviors,take children from parents,seize assets,go on fishing expeditions,invent evidence,ban the ownership of firearms,all without the protections of due process.

Cops,judges and politicians are the only ones left who are not “scumbags” who deserve 3rd class treatment.

It pays so well.
Hundreds of millions of dollars are reaped in exchange for the billions spent via VAWA funding and grants to NGO’s who hype the media hysteria which justifies said draconian actions.

Most people are stupid enough to think it’s a good thing.

The day will come when women get the same treatment as men,and they will no longer have the protection of men as they’ve abused the victim status to become empowered as 1st class supremacists.

I long for the day the infant if ripped from the sucking breast ad held hostage for money,just like they do to fathers.

Yes,just like they do to fathers.
Just like that.
Just like that,except for women.
Exactly like THAT.
Then it’s off to jail-bitch!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Jean Valjean October 4, 2012 at 17:03

I stopped caring about rape, sexual assault, domestic violence and whatever women get butt hurt over a long time ago.

After 42 years of women crying wolf and reminding us how evil men are and how weak and pathetic women are but really women are just as strong and capable as men are except really women are stronger and better than men are but remember we’re all equal but somehow despite superior capabilities women are still victims of the male dominated society and deserve your sympathy and assists because of their special needs but remember even though we’re all the same men don’t have special needs because they have all the power as we can see by women’s domination of education, workforce, massive entitlements and their majority vote but none of that equates to female power because men have all the power. . . I’ve decided that I no longer give a rats ass about teh wyminz problems.

Seriously, if they all got raped tomorrow I wouldn’t care too much other than to wonder about the logistics of all that raping and to think that’s a whole lot of work to achieve something you could have done at home by yourself with a little lube and some free internet porn.

I’m not saying that I wish pain on women but rather, if you aren’t family or a close friend then you just aren’t my problem. Being equal means I’m no longer responsible for the health and safety of women. Women have certainly demonstrated a callous disregard for the welfare of men over the last 42 years so by that example I feel completely justified in returning that callous disregard today.

You don’t owe me. I don’t owe you. That’s equality bitches!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
jimbo October 4, 2012 at 17:32

@Jean Valjean

That is pretty damn good. The only way it might get better is to explain why the fucking bitches have given men far more fucking pain than the bitches have received themselves. The concept that we are somehow equal, so that authority should somehow be shared… that is the road to hell.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
From the League of the Blue Pimpernel October 4, 2012 at 18:02

Sink me! This is why I hope time travel is never invented: the feminists would go into the past and retroactively deem all men rapists! Then they would get the idea to go back to the dawn of humanity and arrest all the first men, who, obviously being pre-civilized men would have no concept of “women’s rights.” Then the whole demmed human race and its history would go poof!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
cyclotronMajesty October 4, 2012 at 19:08

lol Jean Valjean awesome.

I think most women are just unconscious… like a dog, when they see something they bark at it cuz they have tunnel vision. Misogyny or truth?

Keep women in their place or they’ll fuck shit up.
Too bad nobody seems to get that anymore.
So this this the loooong road to hell.
Not because anyone’s gonna listen
but because they already know
everything.

Don’t bother me with the facts i’ve already made up my mind!!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Lance Hardwood October 4, 2012 at 19:22

I love the inflammatory language. How is it “assault”? Did she get seriously hurt? No. She maybe felt uncomfortable for the moment. And well, even back in the day you can get a white knight to rescue you. The “rape culture” meme is disgusting. Everything that might make a woman temporarily uncomfortable is somehow equated with rape. It also cheapens the plight of actual rape victims just comparing the two. It’s like saying I’m promoting “stab culture” if I point my finger at someone.

We gotta stop making public policy based on what some psychotic group of fugly dykes made the real world out to be. These women shouldn’t run institutions, they should be in institutions. Of the mental kind. You can’t even argue that shit, it’s so out there.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
TheBiboSez October 4, 2012 at 19:41

My Dearest Beloveds –

I failed my first big test as a MGHOW yesterday.

Wednesday morning around 2 AM I was walking back to my inner-city apartment from the bar 4 blocks away. Due to some construction issues I had to take a rare detour around to the back of my building.

As I got to the corner of the poorly lit street I’d never walked before, I noticed a young woman prone on the sidewalk, head on the curb, her partially clothed body hugging the right front tire of a new, cranberry-colored Suburu. She was blonde, a mid-20′s white girl, a bit overweight (but not heinous), wearing a black blouse and pants that were pulled down enough to expose 4 inches of pale buttcrack. A set of keys was also on the sidewalk about a foot from her ass. She was slightly breathing and twitching as if in an intoxicated slumber.

She was wearing shoes, but I don’t remember them. Doubtless, this will disappoint her.

For a moment, like Virgil contemplating the whole of hell, I was paralyzed: I now identify as MRA/MGTOW, but 50 years of White Knight training runs deep, and although I knew theoretically that I should just keep walking and leave her to a brutal fate, in practice this time I was compelled to help. There hasn’t been a homicide in over 8 years in my neighborhood (a large entertainment district still recovering from the downturn) and I didn’t want to set the clock back to zero.

I neither touched nor otherwise engaged the chick – I know enough about the “honey badger” scam to take precautions, and the last thing I wanted was for her to start screaming “rape”.

I don’t carry a cellphone – who needs some bitch chattering in my ear about her butthurt feewings on my dime? – but I was able to flag down the lone passing car – a cab – and I asked the driver to call 911.

The driver was a REAL African, probably of dubious immigration status, and he was quite reluctant to call the police for any reason. I reassured him repeatedly that the girl was still alive but needed assistance. I told him I would talk to 911 if he didn’t want to get involved but that he should dial it. He did, and handed me the cell.

I told the 911 operator the details about the girl and the plate number of the Suburu. The taxi driver waited until the first of two police cars arrived about 3 minutes later – there was a police substation about 5-6 blocks away.

The first policeman asked me if I was “with her”. I said No; I had just found her while walking home. After several minutes of prodding and loud police talk, the drunken (or perhaps, diabetic, according to the cops) girl managed to sit up partially, which only exposed her bethonged ass more. She seemed dizzy and was still unable to speak beyond a weak grunt.

I identified myself to the police and asked if I could leave since I had to be back at work in the morning. They agreed, and I walked home. I doubt I will ever find out the rest of her story – did they arrest her? take her to hospital? save her from injury at the hands of the many miscreants who prowl the downtown area?

Now, looking back on the incident and my failure – earlier in the day another blonde, mid-20′s, recently-married woman I barely know had done me a rather nice favor (unasked for), and so, I was feeling more encouraged by the fairer sex than I usually am. Without this favor and the good feelings, I might have just kept walking – it was a VERY close call for me to either ignore or become agent in the plight of drunk girl.

Gender feminists are still rare in my part of the world, so the odds that I inadvertantly helped one are about 100-1 against. Still, that is no excuse.

And that is what the Bibo Sez.

Bless you!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Nemo October 4, 2012 at 20:09

In the comic book and also the movie “The Watchmen”, in the alternate timeline that had superheroes, the sailor was replaced by a lesbian superheroine.

She was later killed in her bed with her female lover in what was supposed to be some sort of hate crime against women.

It’s interesting that so much of modern fictional media is based on redefining the past to fit a political agenda. The newest TV series on Sherlock Holmes has a woman playing the role of Watson, for example. Historical computer games often have equal numbers of male and female leaders or main characters, even though female rulers have been quite rare.

This is a two-for-one winner for feminists because it gives girls a new role model and simultaneously deprives boys of a strong heroic male figure to admire and emulate.

This practice of rewriting works of literature to edit out men and insert women in their place reminds of the old Soviet habit of airbrushing old pictures of party meetings to remove figures who were politically disgraced. A picture of Stalin and Trotsky would become a picture of Stalin and a tree, for example.

It’s an act of vandalism that is straight out of the Soviet playbook. It’s somehow “empowering” for women to rewrite things to make them the heroes and men the zeroes.

If nobody stops them, I could easily envision women banning the original works of art and replacing them with the feminist rewrites. It would fit with their pattern of banning anything that they don’t like and making everything that benefits them a legally mandated right, like free birth control pills for law students.

They already have a term for it: replacing “history” with “her-story”. In more ways than one …

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
namae nanka October 4, 2012 at 20:45

““Some people want to use it as a symbol of harassment of women, but that’s what we’ve been fighting all these years,” Craig said in a telephone interview from her home in Toronto. “It’s not a symbol of harassment. It’s a symbol of a woman having an absolutely wonderful time!””

http://isteve.blogspot.in/2011/10/oktoberfest_14.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Annonymous October 4, 2012 at 22:35

@ TheBiboSez

You are a sentimental fool.

Furthermore in true white style, you exposed the African cabbie to more immigration problems by using his cell phone, in your borrowed decency and patronizing show of care.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Lyn87 October 5, 2012 at 00:11

The day I graduated from high school a group of us were walking and talking together after the ceremony; among us a female German exchange student. We weren’t dating, but we were on friendly terms.

On an impulse I threw a lip-lock on her.

Okay, okay… it wasn’t VJ Day…

… She didn’t mind.
————————————
A few months earlier a female supervisor at my job had pulled me into a broom closet. She was a raging slut and she had me pegged as a goodie-two-shoes and wanted to see what I would do. Her boyfriend (also a supervisor) came up with the idea – like a dare.

She closed the door and went to kiss me – probably thinking I would shy away.

I would never have made a play for her in a million years, but my masculinity was being overtly challenged.

I grabbed her hips, pulled her in, and kissed her…

… We left the closet and she told her boyfriend I was a good kisser. (Seriously: you can’t make this stuff up.)
————————————
I was out biking one day and I stopped in front of the local post office.

I did high-jumping and fencing back then and had the legs to prove it.

A young woman walked by and I caught her scoping out my legs like a hungry dog eying a lamb chop.
————————————
Was I guilty of sexual assault? Was I a victim of sexual assault? Sexual harassment on the job? Was I objectified? Was I traumatized? None of the above? All of the above?

Or am I just an old-school guy who thinks that none of that is cause for alarm or endless introspection?
————————————
Seriously – what is wrong with these women? Are their lives so perfect that they have nothing better to do than whine about a fighting man kissing a woman when they heard the announcement that the largest war in human history was ending – from 67 years ago?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
hv October 5, 2012 at 01:44

Off topic:

Check out this inane discussion with “modern” Western feminists.

Feminism’s Future:

Author Naomi Wolf’s new book “Vagina: A New Biography,” has been criticized and rejected by many feminists young and old. What does this reaction tell us about where the feminist movement stands today and where it is headed? Erica Jong joins a group of young women as they tell Steve Paikin what they think about the future of feminism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhwiNaZu_so&list=UUu_u-P3cBFO7D-sAjxd_I-w&index=1&feature=plcp

A good demonstration as there ever was of the solipsism, narcissism, desire for sluttery and obsession with triviality and nonsense of modern Western feminists and Western women.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
MarcusAurelius October 5, 2012 at 01:48

@ Bibo
You did the right thing. The point is that unlike most of todays women that are brainwashed by feminist garbage, we are not wholly self-serving and are capable of compassion. If I’d been there I would have done the same thing. Chances are that girl truly could have been the victim of a crime or an assault, or if she hadn’t been she could have ended up one just lying there unconscious. Even if she was just a random drunk who passed out there or something it was still worthwhile to help. She could have od’d or had delerium tremors…you may have saved a life; and far be it from questioning yourself or your logic…I say it is heroic. Look: we are still humans. We should exercise compassion. Hell I would’ve helped if it’d been some big famous man hating feminist…..why? Because its just the right thing to do. We disagree with these people because of policy, because of practice; but to save a life is to save a life. I would feel less than human if I just walked away. But I will draw the line at self induced stupidity. One night a few years back I was at a nightclub and this girl nearby me suddenly started puking everywhere, slipped on her own vomit in her high heeled slut attire and fell down literally at my feet. She looked up at me almost in a pleading way, and this half disgusted half amused sneer appeared on my lips and I just walked away without helping. Then suddenly all these white knights rushed to aid the drunken damsel…..but not before giving me looks of utter hate, like “how dare you not help this poor woman!” Lol. A gentleman draws the line at stupidity. If I’d seen the girl you described drunkely step out of a cab only to fall over bc she was too drunk to walk….yeah I would have laughed and kept right on going. But in your case, you did the right thing.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
DCM October 5, 2012 at 03:12

“Jean Valjean October 4, 2012 at 17:03
……………
After 42 years of women crying wolf and reminding us how evil men are and how weak and pathetic women are but really women are just as strong and capable as men are except really women are stronger and better than men are but remember we’re all equal but somehow despite superior capabilities women are still victims of the male dominated society and deserve your sympathy and assists because of their special needs but remember even though we’re all the same men don’t have special needs because they have all the power as we can see by women’s domination of education, workforce, massive entitlements and their majority vote but none of that equates to female power because men have all the power. .
………”

I don’t think I’ve ever seen it better expressed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
numnut October 5, 2012 at 04:54

“The first policeman asked me if I was “with her”. I said No; I had just found her while walking home. After several minutes of prodding and loud police talk, the drunken (or perhaps, diabetic, according to the cops) girl managed to sit up partially, which only exposed her bethonged ass more. She seemed dizzy and was still unable to speak beyond a weak grunt.

I identified myself to the police and asked if I could leave since I had to be back at work in the morning. They agreed, and I walked home.”

You’re pretty lucky,if something could be fabricated and pinned upon you it would have.

There is no way I would have made that,would have ran in the other direction hoping not to be seen.

Frankly I worry that if the cops giver her your name (they have been known to violate policy/law to enable wymyn,charges could STILL be fabricated against you.

Best to write down what you did that day and keep supporting evidence such as receipts and credit card statement.
Best of all would be to have witnesses for the 24 hrs previous to finding this ‘charge in a box.’

Dumb move man,dumb move,of course the cops suspected you,and they always will.

Hope you can prove yourself innocent,because you’re sure as hell presumed guilty.

So-Are you with her or not?
Can you prove that?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
zed October 5, 2012 at 06:27

It’s interesting that so much of modern fictional media is based on redefining the past to fit a political agenda.

Winston Smith – “Ministry of Truth”

The Thought Police are everywhere. Orwell was a very astute observer of human nature.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
bruno October 5, 2012 at 07:41

HE risked his life in war, but SHE gets kissed?

That’s exactly what is wrong with this world.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Georice81 October 5, 2012 at 08:49

That WWII sailor in that iconic picture is a rapist bastard. The present administration should do everything in its power to find him, arrest him, throw him in jail and throw the key away. That woman and her descendants should be able to sue the hell out of this man and his estate.

It is better for us to lose a war than for men to go out groping women just because we won.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Turbo the Drycleaner October 5, 2012 at 08:51

@thebibosez

I think what you did was a good thing and despite the hysteria in some comments trouble doesn’t usually come down on people for no reason. False accusations usually happen when there is some incentive, like if the girl got drunk and had sex with a stranger and didnt want her boyfriend to know she was a slut. In this case neither the police or the woman have anything to gain by fabricating charges against you so they wont.

It also doesnt make you a white knight. A white knight is someone whose “good deeds” come from a place of sexual desire for a certain woman or perhaps a belief in “the respectability and inherent goodness of all women”. Theyll charge into situations where a woman is being “harassed”, swinging their dick around and generally making things worse. White knights are the bouncers in a club that throw men out without question at the word of a woman, the Bill Bennett clones who demand men throw their lives away for women without leading by example, the dudes who try to save a woman from her badboy boyfriend etc. theyll rush to the defense of women on the internet (but rarely in person because they arent that brave) but you can bet if it had been a man collapsed on the sidewalk they would have walked right past them.

Helping people out in a situation like that makes you a good samaritan not a white knight.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
john thames October 5, 2012 at 08:55

I’ve always said that the best way to handle this sexual harassment horseshit is to create a concept called hormonal harassment – the tort of giving men unwanted erections by showing off the boobs or butt in any way, shape or form. Then, when Miss Moneypenny asks 007: “For the ten thousandth time, James, when are you going to stick it in me?” James can sue her for “repeated unwanted sexual overtures in te business office”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
zed October 5, 2012 at 09:05

Seriously – what is wrong with these women? Are their lives so perfect that they have nothing better to do than whine about …
from 67 years ago?

I know it’s a rhetorical question, but what is “wrong” with these women is feminism, and feminists have nothing better to do than whine about everything.

Yes, their lives are so carefree – in historic terms when mere survival was not a given – that they have to root around through thousands of years of history to find ways that they did not get everything they wanted exactly as they wanted it – and obviously the cause is “patriarchy”, with most men spending most of their waking hours dreaming up bad things to do to women and frustrate their desires.

It would be nice if the manosphere would move beyond seeming to be surprised and incredulous that blood suckers actually suck blood and move on the next step of thinking about eradicating them.

“Wow, don’t these ticks (or mosquitoes) have anything better to do with their time than suck blood?”

Well, no, sucking blood is what they do. Having a higher purpose than sucking blood is restricted to people who can think and don’t rely on their nervous systems to produce a constant stream of nonsensical output – which we know excludes feminists.

The first attempt at building the Panama Canal was laid low by the lowly mosquito. It was only after some serious efforts at eradication that construction was able to progress normally.

Unless we think about eradicating the femosquitoes, or the “Yes Dear” ticks, we are just going to have to sit and watch while they suck all the blood out of us.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
john thames October 5, 2012 at 09:10

http://www.truecrimereport.com/2011/06/aarons_95_million_sexual_haras.php

See comments section and essays Unwanted Sexual Stimulation Law and Before Men Developed Virtue

The real point here, as I think William F. Price would agree, is that sexual harassment is a concoction. The women preaching this bullshit are the same women who were screwing every guy in the office in the 1960′s. As Roger Devlin ppints out in his excellent essay on Sexual Utopia, we have gone from sexual anarchy to sexual terror. JFK never heard of “taking advantage of subordinates” while screwing his secretaries. Sharon Tate never heard of the concept while wiggling her ass in Dean Martin’s face in “The Wrecking Crew”. As Devlin says, if a concept no one ever heard of for thousands of years suddenly becomes a dread disease, then what we have is a concoction.

The people pushing this pseudo-concept are, of course, the same people who applauded, in the 1960′s, the very free love attitudes they now condemn as “sexual misconduct”. It isn’t that they can’t remember what they were preaching yesterday; it is simply that they are professional liars – and the party line has changed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
keyster October 5, 2012 at 09:21

Her mouth was violated without her consent.
Women’s bodies are just another aspect of the spoils of war.
To kiss and grope is to reap the rewards of VICTORY!

A half a million American men die defending the world from Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire. A woman is kissed against her will in Times Square. Oh the HORROR! I suppose she suffered from PTSD her entire life after that traumatic incident.

A Man dies, a woman is raped in the midst of war.
Which is the worser of fates?

“Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.” – Hillary Clinton.

…because when a husband, father or son actually DIES – – he’s merely a “secondary” victim. While the women are left to mourn, before they “move on with their lives”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
justunperdant October 5, 2012 at 10:19

@zed.

This is why I have no faith in MRM and MGTOW. People are not interested in real action. Few people have real courage and prefer to be told what to do and what to thing.

This goes for men and women ( there is only about 5 % of real leader in this world the rest are follower). Few men and women can take real control of their life and think for them self.

This is why I am stopping blogging as I find people don’t have real opinions .

This is why I am watching the collapse closely, I want to see what the 95 % will do once the government become ineffective and people have to provide for them self.

I am signing out of all the blogs on the web

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rebel October 5, 2012 at 10:35

You may be doing things today that are considered perfectly legal. But who knows when the same thing will be seen as a crime?
And then there could be laws that punish retroactively.

So, whatever you do legally today could put you in jail tomorrow, retroactively. Scary thoughts?

Impossible?

IMHO this is likely to happen, judging from the way things evolve.

And if feminism becomes weaker, I suspect the the shrieking will become even more strident.

The word here is: CAUTION—ACHTUNG!!

Prepare to defend your freedom.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Patr333x October 5, 2012 at 10:42

Perhaps these women are jealous that they will not be kissed like that? The kind of men who came back from WWII are not the kind of men feminists know how to appreciate.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Gamerp4 October 5, 2012 at 11:28

Who would have thought that Kissing a woman in the joy of victory is “Sexual Assualt” Well No Comments Just a Big Facepalm.

http://fotozup.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/facepalm06.jpg

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
origimi October 5, 2012 at 12:01

Are you saying that kissing just anyone on the street is OK?

Can I kiss your wife without her permission? What about you?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Georice81 October 5, 2012 at 12:05

In the HBO series and book titled “A Band of Brothers” there is an interesting scene where a Fraulien runs into two American GIs who are looking for eggs in her family’s barn. One of the soldiers tries to get some action out of her and tries to bribe her with cigarettes. The other walks away and leaves them alone. The young german lass slaps the GI hard in his face and he returns back to his buddy who then laughs at him.

Stephen Ambrose says it best in the book when he states that had it been Soviet, German, or Japanese soldiers in enemy territory the outcome would’ve been much different.

American women back then knew this and appreciated their boys in uniform and did let them know that. These fighting men were what stood between them and savagery. The world has turned upside down since then.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Towgunner October 5, 2012 at 12:27

Well gents this lunacy is not without precedent. Stands to reason this old icon is being cast away, the new version of this, reflecting the feelings of all of us, of course (sarc), are two women kissing. Luckily that PR stunt fizzled out, but true to form they’ll keep trying and trying and trying until they force us to accept it. Now, we all know feminism is very much a lesbian-centric movement, that said, put aside any differences about homosexuality and realize that as iconic of a picture the WWII sailor and girl was its being deliberately replaced by this new age lesbo image. Why? Well, consistent with feminist theory, which contends, that all male to female sex is rape, lesbian sex can only be the true way for an independent empowered women to fully realize herself. The utter insanity of all this is too much to cover, but they’re literally forcing, manipulating, cajoling, brainwashing human beings to believe that men and women as a couple is outdated and even evil. You couldn’t make this stuff up. What I ultimately take issue with and what I hope the MRA will counter-act and one day destroy is the fact that as you and I toil away at out increasingly harder and longer jobs with crappier pay etc right in front of us is a small group of people re-engineering our culture. We can do something about it. These people are sick and evil. The endstate is very disturbing being an actual schism between men and women, deeper than today’s believe it or not; but look it up, you’ll find evidence of this is throughout feminist writings etc. Myself included I can’t look at women the same way anymore, to me they’re just another competitor for resources and not the once tender and maternal reprieve from this darwinian struggle we all try to think doesn’t exist. And I’m not asking or suggesting men here change their hearts towards women, women must take responsibility for their actions, a male backlash is inevitable. Hopefully the reset that is coming or maybe wwIII or the very likely constitutional republic revolution (in my opinion a very likely event if barry gets re-elected and a armed and hot one at that) will finally destroy this odious disease of a movement. The WWII sailor and girl image, among many other things, illustrated a healthy relationship between the sexes and personified all that was good with American culture…men and women complimenting each other. Today’s women on women speaks to only half the population and of that half .5 or 1.5 % depending on which stat of homosexuality you believe. It’s divisive and harkens the simple adage of “divided we fall’, but such is status our all accepting and open culture of compassion. Quick aside, I’d encourage everyone to watch the South Park episode “raising the bar”, where Kyle and Stan wonder why we’ve devolved to such a depressing level that honey boo boo is entertaining. The answer is multifaceted of course, but I think folks at the MRA can attribute a great deal of the lower bar to feminism. After all what kind of a culture do you think will evolve if one of the most popular ideologies tell women to hate men and to see children as parasites?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Pops October 5, 2012 at 13:02

Of course, nothing happened to this woman:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YqhashVGfpA

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Avenger October 5, 2012 at 13:12

@Geo-so you’re getting your history lessons now from Hollywood and Spielberg? There were plenty of bastards n the US army who would rape German girls if their superiors didn’t keep then under strict control.(they did anyway) I also think that if you had the Nazis pounding your cities for years and had 20m of your population killed or starved you’d have a different attitude about things. Very few US civilians were killed in WWII and they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. How many US soldiers had their mothers, wives or children killed in the war?I doubt very much that the average German or Russian is any more brutal than an American, it’s just that the Americans were brought up in a more innocent country protected by 3k miles of ocean on each side. There was plenty of brutality and raping during the US civil war and the POW camps were as bad as the concentration camps.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Pops October 5, 2012 at 13:15

“Are you saying that kissing just anyone on the street is OK?

Can I kiss your wife without her permission? What about you?”

Morganna Roberts repeatedly got away with it and made millions in the process. Do you think that any man could get a case dismissed by a laughing judge using anything similar to the “gravity defense”?

And of course, Will Smith didn’t stand for being kissed by a man without permission, but no one was outraged by the attempt and Will had to handle the situation totally on his own (no sexual assault charges). If Will was a woman, the kisser would have been arrested.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
freebird October 5, 2012 at 14:45

Just bothered to read the comments at the rad-fem site.
The one gals wants the “right” to shoot upon ‘breach of boundary.’

The law today would give her a pass.
Gamers should see this as a guy with strong frame and good game,the wymyns want to kill.
You are warned gamers,there is no recourse for you.

Also it sucks the good Samaritan story here pulled that African cabbie into HIS mess.

You guys are all gonna realize that they wymyns have gone manicidal and “The Law” is propping them up.

It’s all or nothing anymore,I would recommend nothing until cornered,then go all out.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
freebird October 5, 2012 at 14:58

Watching old James Bond Movies today,He does not ask permission before kissing either.If Will Smith should lay a kiss on an unsuspecting woman she would be flattered.
It’s all about double standards ties to the status women might get by proxy.

It’s wither pony up by proxy, or pay the man with the gun,by proxy.

They refuse to have any agency or accountability of their own.

SSDD

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
maxsnafu October 5, 2012 at 15:55

I used to think that any nation that would send its women to war was decadent and depraved. After reading this article and others like it I say send them to the front. All of them. Now.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Avenger October 5, 2012 at 16:47

So, whatever you do legally today could put you in jail tomorrow, retroactively. Scary thoughts?

Two clauses in the US Constitution prohibit ex post facto laws: Art 1, § 9 and Art. 1 § 10. see, e.g. Collins v. Youngblood, 497 US 37 (1990) and California Dep’t of Corrections v. Morales, 514 US 499 (1995).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
zimmy October 5, 2012 at 18:01

““Wow, don’t these ticks (or mosquitoes) have anything better to do with their time than suck blood?”

“Well, no, sucking blood is what they do. ….. Unless we think about eradicating the femosquitoes…”
_____________________

Femosquitoes is a good name for them. After all, only the female mosquito sucks blood.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
TheBiboSez October 5, 2012 at 19:18

Just a note of thanks to all who commented on my post above.

Indeed, I agree with you all – I WAS a fool, and I did do the right thing. I think.

I knew the risk I was taking by identifying myself to the cops, but I wanted to establish up front that I had nothing to hide. Could this come back to bite me? Yes, indeed it might.

As regards the cabbie – one detail I omitted before because it seemed self serving – before he left, the cabbie described me to the policeman as “a good man”. I do regret inconveniencing him and possibly placing him at risk. After all, he is a good man, too.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American October 5, 2012 at 19:44

The kissing sailor was a blatant public showing of “Hetero-dominance” in America, and the white Gender, Gender- raunch community don’t like heter0-dominance.
The American Gender, Gender-Raunch community, (like any other pressure group in America) have a right to promote any of their values they choose, like any other group in America. But When Gender Raunch use state and federal dollars to create a “manufactured statistics Alliance” with American law enforcement that serves to “Manufacture” faulty statistics that Gender-raunch use to “Inflame” their way to Empowerment at Universities Across the country, well thats not only perverse, but unconstitutional.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American October 5, 2012 at 19:48

Every protocol perversion and semantics game that American law enforcement currently engage in to enable womens violence, and persecute an innocent man, creates a “manufactured statistic” that gender-raunch use at Universities around the country to “Inflame” the public against the hetero-male. This is not only a perverse use federal funding, but is unconstitutional.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
tiredofitall October 5, 2012 at 19:57

“It will never end until someone finally, decisively says ‘no.’
That’s right, no means no.”

Boy, that’d really chap the femmies asses if you turned that around on them. They invented that to use on men.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Ken Beta October 5, 2012 at 20:51

I just can’t see why they’d pick on something from so long ago. Aren’t both of the people in that famous photo dead now? I mean, what’s the big deal?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American October 6, 2012 at 01:47

Around 25 years ago When American law enforcement started engaging in “protocol perversions and semantics games” that served to enable womens domestic violence, and persecuting innocent men on false accusations of domestic violence, it was like feeding the American Gender-feminist community steroids. Gender-feminists have been “Inflaming” and “Empowering” themselves with the perverted and or “Manufactured” statistics from American law enforcement for around 25 years now, and this perverse and destructive Alliance is starting to bear its rotten fruits.
Main stream American media (like ABC news) can only “Inflame” the public against the hetero-male, hetero-father if they have grist to throw into their mill, and the grist to throw in their mill are the perversions that American law enforcement are getting federal pervert pork to engage in.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American October 6, 2012 at 01:59

The gains and empowerment the white Gender, Gender-raunch community have usurped through perversion of American law enforcement will prove to be a phyric victory.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous October 6, 2012 at 06:33

If men stop white knighting, the current laws not requiring good samaritan responses by non involved passerbys will be changed to require “reasonable” assistance. Then the new law will be enforced primarily against men. watch for this trend as MGTOW grows.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
V10 October 6, 2012 at 08:08

Avenger: “Two clauses in the US Constitution…”

The what what now?

Kinda like how indefinite detention without charge, assassination by executive order without trial, or arrest for expressing a rude opinion are all prohibited?

The law means whatever they want it to mean, subject to change without notice.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Avenger October 6, 2012 at 14:50

AV10- I intentionally cited two cases. You could never be prosecuted under ex post facto laws. Some statutes of limitations have been expended but these are for things that were already illegal in their time.

“assassination by executive order without trial”
Was some US citizen assassinated? Anyone who fights for or aids an enemy of the US loses their ccitizenship so if one or two of these people are killed I really don’t care.

“arrest for expressing a rude opinion are all prohibited”

Give me a case where this has happened where the person wasn’t publicly inciting people to immediate violencce

“indefinite detention without charge”

Give me an example of this too that happened in the US. Prosecutors have had cases dismissed because they missed deadlines for filing charges, indictments, and bringing the case to trial

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Avenger October 6, 2012 at 14:50

* extended

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Avenger October 6, 2012 at 15:15

I knew the risk I was taking by identifying myself to the cops, but I wanted to establish up front that I had nothing to hide

You’re a fool. If the girl was dead the cops always suspect the person who found her just as the husband is the #1 suspect when a wife is found dead.
If you wanted to do something you should have just called the emergency room at the local hospital and given the details but even here you’re taking a chance if the girl was dead because it’s easy to trace calls today and the cops may then want to have a word with you.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
"The One" October 6, 2012 at 20:31

Can’t stand these Feminists… The Patriarchy will prevail over their wretchedness.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American October 7, 2012 at 05:34

@ “The One”, …the patriarchy is already prevailing, its just the patriarchy that is prevailing is the “White Gender-feminist patriarchy”. The White Gender-feminist patriarchy maintains hegemony by perversions to our legal system, and by “breaking” anyone’s patriarchy who is not white Gender, gender-raunch.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
American October 7, 2012 at 05:43

Folks want to protect themselves from gender-raunch, but don’t want to take an honest look at how Gender-raunch became so “Empowered”.
There are two simple things that are now perverted, that if corrected, would slowly “Humble” the loud, arrogant, “Gender, Gender-raunch community”.
1. Charge women with domestic violence when they are violent. Because Gender, gender-raunch are now using manufactured domestic violence statistics to “Empower” themselves, these domestic violence statistics need to be accurate, and not “Perverted”.
2. Charge women when they lie about rape. Because American Gender-raunch are now “Inflaming” their way to Empowerment using perverse and inaccurate rape statistics, these perverse statistics need to be “Un-perverted”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
freebird October 7, 2012 at 10:15

“before he left, the cabbie described me to the policeman as “a good man”. I do regret inconveniencing him and possibly placing him at risk. After all, he is a good man, too.”

The ‘good man’ the worst insult available to modern man.

I think you should be clear this time,but a note has been placed in your file,do not do that again.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
djc October 7, 2012 at 18:46

I must admit that I would probably have just walked on by.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
continenet October 8, 2012 at 04:13

If it’s so foffesnsive for men to kiss women on the mouth after sacrificing their lives to save the world, why is it not offensive for male politicans to kiss feminist’s ass and then kiss babies on the mouth for political campaign? Hard to treat and virtually impossible to cure at advanced stage MRSA is trasmitted by skin contact.
http://www.cdc.gov/mrsa/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Sam October 8, 2012 at 17:14

Leave it to the Feminists to turn this into something ugly.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Agree with "fems" for once October 9, 2012 at 12:43

Sorry guys, this is one of those very, very rare times I agree with the topic of derision. At first glance, I scoffed at the idea that this was assault, I doubt it’s a sign of rape culture.

But what if this was your wife, girlfriend, sister, out there minding her own business, genuinely performing her duties/celebrate the victory and some guy just forcefully grabs her and thrusts his lips upon her, with probably some tongue action as well (necessitating a checkup because you don’t know if this guy is diseased).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Doc October 10, 2012 at 12:17

I’ve had women tell me that they wouldn’t sleep with me, and I agree and say the same thing, all the way up to and after sealing the deal. After all, I was awake the entire time, and we had sex, and she said that she wouldn’t “sleep with” me – she didn’t say anything about having sex. But the entire time I was saying just what she was, as I undressed her and mounted her.

Women just don’t want to be thought of as a slut – even if they are. So as long as they communicate that to you, you’re good…

And all women like a man who takes control so they feel they were “carried away” in the moment. Of course, they may argue with that, but all guys know… I figure, if she’s wet enough to leave a wet spot on the sheets, she’s more than ready. A woman can’t hide what her body is saying… Which is usually – “slide it in big boy”…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
john thames October 13, 2012 at 16:08

UNWANTED SEXUAL STIMULATION LAW

Do men have the right to work in a testicular distress free environment? Are they entitled to concentrate on their job instead of having breast cleavage and ass in tight skirts parade past their desks? Of course they are. Unwanted sexual stimulation law is designed to protect men from erectile discomfort caused by hormonal harasser females. If a woman is giving you an erection by parading her breasts and buttocks across the workplace, sue her. A woman is showing boobs by opening her blouse? Get her fired and sue your employer. She has no right to treat your workplace as her Playboy centerfold shoot. Another bitch is showing her ass like a ripe apple? Sue her! You’ll be sitting on a cushion of millions; she will be rubbing a very sore posterior.

Unwanted sexual stimulation law does not just apply to the work place. It applies to every public forum where women behave as though they were in a bedroom. If you are down at the public beach and you see women topless or walking around with their bottom exposed, sue for unwanted sexual stimulation. You have your pants on; she doesn’t. Unwanted sexual stimulation is a terrible problem in modern society. Women think that they have a right to disregard indecent exposure statutes as archaic relics. Women are whores and their unwanted sexual stimulation of men must be wiped out.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
john thames October 13, 2012 at 16:11

Readers of “The Spearhead” may recall the movie
“The Music Man” with Robert Preston and Shirley Jones. Preston “sexually harasses” Jones by invading her sex free work place and singing “Marian the Librarian”. Professor Harold Hill would be in big trouble today.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: