“Heroic” Single Moms

by W.F. Price on July 25, 2012

Stories about women shoplifting and subsequently abandoning babies when caught by security have grown in frequency in recent years. Maybe they think by taking a baby on their stealing jaunts they will be immune from suspicion, and then when they get caught figure that the baby will help them get away. Or maybe they simply aren’t thinking at all.

The following video shows a mother ditching her child when caught by WalMart security, closely followed by the child’s hefty aunt, who fights off the security in the parking lot. The mother is pretty fast; you can see her running full-tilt – away from her baby – down the lot on the way to (temporary) freedom.

The two women were picked up at a local dance club partying it up a short time later.

I wonder how much more of this it will take until preachers stop carrying on about the “inherent goodness of women” and depravity of men. How much more maltreatment and neglect of children will it take before default mother custody and glorification of single motherhood finally comes into question?

{ 27 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim July 25, 2012 at 07:54

It won’t stop til the whole corrupt system comes crashing down. I have zilch empathy for them.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 61 Thumb down 1
anonymous July 25, 2012 at 07:55

I wonder how much more of this it will take until preachers stop carrying on about the “inherent goodness of women” and depravity of men. How much more maltreatment and neglect of children will it take before default mother custody and glorification of single motherhood finally comes into question?

It is already happening in UK. When the government saw firsthand the blowback from singlemotherhood (riots, benefit-cheats, benefits-as-a-lifestyle), they have started to, albeit slowly, change the tone. Recently a government official in UK was quoted as saying the government will want to curb the incentives to singlemotherhood… that is, the benefits.

If the PTB are not personally affected as a class, they will continue lionizing the single-moms.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 51 Thumb down 2
Rebel July 25, 2012 at 08:23

As the title of this thread says,single mothers are seen as heroes. And the country needs more heroes…

I think it will take much more than this to take single mothers from their pedestal, for even when they commit crimes, they are seen as victims, not as perpetrators.

Just imagine the huge shift in people’s perception before the situation is corrected.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 1
confused July 25, 2012 at 08:30

“I wonder how much more of this it will take until preachers stop carrying on about the “inherent goodness of women” and depravity of men.”

this will not end – the facts have been in for years and are still ignored. Mothers are consistently responsible for 60-70% of child abuse. But its ok since its mothers.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm10/cm10.pdf#page=45, table 3-10
http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm09/cm09.pdf page 56 figure 4-3 – hidden in “Parent” but broken down
page 28




Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 1
Okrahead July 25, 2012 at 08:35

Your question: “I wonder how much more of this it will take until preachers stop carrying on about the “inherent goodness of women” and depravity of men. How much more maltreatment and neglect of children will it take before default mother custody and glorification of single motherhood finally comes into question?”
The answer: It will all stop just as soon as you find a way to kill the hamster or society completely collapses. Care to take a bet on which one happens first?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 1
Rebel July 25, 2012 at 09:27

I don’t know if society will collapse or if it will simple wilt and recede.
We see already that many people are “disconnecting” from the “grid” and are learning to become more self-sufficient.

I do not believe that we will go down the way Rome did: probably a gradual shift “downward”.
But people will adapt. We are livinging in an artificial world that cannot be maintained much longer: humans were not made for that kind of life.

With affluence gone, we can even expect that feminism will slowly fade away, as government support will diminish. Our society may benefit from an economical meltdown as we then can return to a more satisfactory lifestyle.

There are always two sides to a coin: what we lose on one hand, we gain on the other. I have quit worrying about the future: it’s what humans have been doing for ages and still… we are here.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 1
Mr. J July 25, 2012 at 09:42

It will stop when most AMERICANS, both male and female, pay attention and actually CARE about justice instead of complaining and paying lip service like the vast majority of them do.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 0
doclove July 25, 2012 at 09:58

Except for widowed mothers, why would anyone in their right mind regard them as heros? They’re idiots and statistics. They should be regarded as a such.

If they never had a husband while having sex, they are idiots. Even the proper use of birth control contraceptives would have probably all but eliminated the risk of pregnancy and chastity or abstinance would have completely eliminated the risk of pregnancy. They chose to get pregnant by leting someone who is not their husband ejaculate inside their vaginas without their male stud using a male latex condomin in conjnction with the female using the pill, provera shot or intrauterine device(IUD) or whatever else is available to women and not men to prevent pregnancy. All the men have is a latex condom to prevent pregnancy. A lot of sex happens while people are intoxicated on alcohol or narcotics etc., then people forget to use latex condoms or use them improperly as a result. The forms of female birth control I listed above do not prevent the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, but they do prevent pregnancy almost all the time. Women also have abortion which men have no say over one way or the other, but if she chooses to have the baby he doesn’t want and she will not agree with him to put the baby up for adoptin, he is left with child support payments. She, a babymomma,should congraulate herself on being the most expensive whore around because even an escort, brothel prostitute or streetwalker is better because at least she almost always leaves you in peace after you part company.

Then we move on to idiot divorced mothers. What I am about to say here usually applies to mothers who give birth to bastard children except the divorced mothers got married nd the others didn’t. Many of these mothers chose a sub par men to be their children’s daddy all because these men made their ginas(vaginas) tingle. The warning signs of what a bad man he was were usually written all over the wall if she cared to read the wall. They chose cads, alphaplayers over dads and beta providers. They chose scum of the Earth over decent human beings, and passed good men on by for the bad boys. Many other of these mothers also drove the good men who impregnated them away with poor behavior. Remember that women initiating divorce in the USA is 60-70% and in South Korea is 60-65%, and that the divorce rate in both countries is 45-50% and 40-45% respetively. There are bad men who are truy effective at hiding how bad they are, but they are few in number and very few women can convince me that it isn’t their fault for choosing bad boys because these women should have percieved, should have known and should haved thought about what they were doing better but chose not to do so because of ther gina tingles. Men would not be forgiven, would not be treated with compassion and not treated decently for choosing bad women(Look at the owner of this site, W.F. Price, as an example.); and women shouldn’t either for choosing bad men. There are some women who I truly feel sympathy for after they divorced because it really wasn’t their fault, but the vast majority of divorced mothers are people I have little or no sympathy for because they did this to themselves. They are outrageously expensive whores too like baby mommas who are on the government enforced male child support provissions or they are outrageously expensive whores on the taxpayer. They should be allowed to fen for themselves and their children alone with no support, and if they or their children are harmed or die as a result, then so be it. I feel no sympathy for babymommas and divorced mothers because noone cares what happens to men who males poor choices or are truly victims of unfortuneate circumstances not of their own fault.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 1
TLM July 25, 2012 at 10:25

On the plus side (pun intended), the baby was white. That means some lucky cracker has been able to successfully compete in the sexual market games with the brothers for the ugly, overweight, white-trash lady sweepstakes. I thought the homies had that corner of the market wrapped up tight since the mid-90′s. You go white boy!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 5
Szebran July 25, 2012 at 10:39

So thats what that was. I saw this real quick on the news last night but didn’t have time to pay attention to it. What a freakin thieving loser! Christ – she’s reproducing??? Not a good sign.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
DruidV July 25, 2012 at 11:55

From aborting their offspring outright, to beating and drowning them and then wrapping their heads with duct tape and finally tossing their tiny corpses into the woods for a jaunt to the club and a quick and easy acquittal via automatic pussy pass, to driving them off a pier while saving their own fat asses, or simply ditching their newborn offspring in a dumpster toilet or alley, to baking them in a car, locking them in a closet and starving them to death while they go out partying, or simply abandoning them altogether at the fire station, whoring them out at 12 years old (female offspring) and marginalizing them (male offspring) , there is no strategy for single mothering, that today’s western female has not yet employed.

Statistics from D.O.J. prove beyond doubt, that womyn are far more abusive and neglectful to their offspring and are far more likely to molest, murder or abandon them, than are males.

Aren’t our empowered, independent, western wymyn, simply lovely fine flowers of femininity?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 0
Troll King July 25, 2012 at 14:04

Well, doncha know that women should have the right to do whatever they want, when they want, with responsibilities to their children, the childrens fathers, and society be damned?

“Every woman should be able to decide when and whether to have children. This is true whether she is HIV-positive or not…There should be no controversy about this. None at all.” – Hillary Clinton


So, according to Hillary Clinton women have ownership over men sperm and have the right to rape men if necessary to have children….if you look at the laws and legal and cultural customs that is about right.

Isn’t it also interesting how Hillary Clinton wants to sexually mutilate millions of boys and men to protect women from HIV. The truth is that it won’t protect women, studies have shown it won’t. The one way that women are sure to not catch HIV from a male partner is to either wear a condom or keep their legs closed.

But Yknow, sluts got da right to be sluts. Doesn’t matter if they give birth to HIV infected kids, cause that is their right.


Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0
ode July 25, 2012 at 15:23

Recently a government official in UK was quoted as saying the government will want to curb the incentives to singlemotherhood… that is, the benefits.

That definitely is a step in the right direction but even if all social welfare was eliminated women would still stupidly spread their legs open for alpha males.
need proof?
Look at Africa.
Despite the serious economic consequences of single motherhood women are incapable of making logical decisions. History has shown the only solution that has worked is social shaming.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Thos July 25, 2012 at 16:11

I don’t mean to sound like a snob but what in Wal-Mart is worth stealing?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0
The Whammer July 25, 2012 at 17:13

She’s runs fast for a fat girl.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Canadian July 25, 2012 at 20:16


I read this differently than everyone else in this thread apparently. Red Pill vs Blue Pill

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Gamerp4 July 25, 2012 at 20:35

Well nothing to see here “The Fairer Sex is at Work”

Where are feminists and conservative women and those pesky White Knights, I bet they would see a “Victim” in her too, poor Single mom, Well Opera, I got a candidate for your next show.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Ron July 26, 2012 at 02:04

I recently reread a book by CS Lewis called “that hideous strength”. Lewis was well known as a stable, rational and moderate individual, and in the book he claims that a small group of nasty occultists are responsible for the wars, crises and social breakdown we see around us. Of course, the whole book is fiction, so he could always claim he never meant it.

Guys, we need to realize that there are some pretty shady and nasty characters out there who view us all, Jew, Muslim, Christian, Animist and Atheist, as vermin. Or cattle. Until we recognize this reality we will not be able to properly deal with it.

Im not calling for a witch hunt at all, but I am saying we need to be aware that there are people that believe some incredibly nasty and vicious shit who are insulated from the consequences of their decisions. Who are these people? Well, start by realistically asking yourself who is benefitting from the current environment. Ask yourself whether the sources of entertainment you spend so much time on, are really to your benefit. Do we really need all the worthless crap we are sold?

Just saying my 2 cents

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
TiredGuy July 26, 2012 at 02:25

From what I understand of Roman history is that it mirrors the U.S. extremely well. And whilst there was the sacking of Rome by the barbarians, Rome had been in decline for quite some time – and the decline set in during the period when the Roman emperors started to purchase votes with welfare money. Even though it was not a democracy, emperors had to be popular to remain upon the imperial throne.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
walking in hell2 July 26, 2012 at 03:38

In the rest of the Anglosphere, the enamor and fascination of single mothers is fading. Within the Anglosphere, America is always a few years behind the social trends.

If one reads the single-mother articles, one can see, even among feminist magazines such as Jezibel, there is not as much pity out there for single mothers as there used to be.

But always in the articles, single-motherhood is blamed on a bolting man or a deadbeat dad, and never on a child-stripping or keep-away mom.

The statistics show that women file for divorce around 80% of the time; 90% of the time they get custody.

Though you may hear domestic violence and cheating trumpeted as the reason for divorce, other statistics show women are the more abusive and adulterous sex.



Women could not become single mothers without the help of the family courts and divorce industry.

Therefore, single mothers, family courts, and the divorce industry are mostly responsible for single motherhood.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
nugganu July 26, 2012 at 04:15

I wonder if manboobz cherry-picker would dare comment on this article. Oh no, that’s right, he’ll conveniently ignore it cuz it doesn’t fit his paradigm.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
ActaNonVerba July 26, 2012 at 05:00

Misandrist, double-standard slap on the wrist punishment in 5..4…3…2..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
MKP July 26, 2012 at 06:15

I gotta say, gainesville.com is not winning me over with these production values.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Bskillet81 July 26, 2012 at 06:53

I wonder how much more of this it will take until preachers stop carrying on about the “inherent goodness of women” and depravity of men.

Women make up 2/3rds to 3/4ths of all church attendance. Whenever a pastor feeds their hamsters, his offering income rises. If he attempts to slay the hamsters, he finds himself with a bunch of irate EAPs outside his door demanding that he take back what he said.

It will stop when women no longer have any money to give. In other words, it will stop once the America goes Greece and the free-ride economy collapses.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Jolly Rauncher July 26, 2012 at 09:17


If what was written is the absolute truth (that’s “IF”), that fucker deserved the shit he got. He needs to get off the asshole-in-a-bottle/can/flask and get a grip!

I’m sure in many of the situations the bitch wasn’t much of an angel, but this guy seriously acted like an idiot!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
gilgamesh July 26, 2012 at 09:34


Manboobz didn’t ignore that scum having fun video (the one where those women pretended to shoot a man in the back of the head and lick up the blood). He actually defended it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Anonymous age 70 July 27, 2012 at 08:28

Here in Mexico, the child protection system is called DIF, and they do take kids away who are being neglected. So far all kids I have seen taken away have been because of maternal neglect or exposure to an unacceptable lifestyle.

One woman used to wander around, leaving small kids at home alone. Kids: gone. She got them back as soon as she moved to her MIL”s ranch, where the MIL could monitor them, or supply back-up care.

The other one didn’t neglect them as much as expose them to unacceptable lifestyle. She was ugly as sin, but every few months, she would be living with a different man. DIF gave the kids to her mom in Mexico City, where they prospered.

I cannot say about paternal problems, but so far I don’t know of DIF taking kids because of father problems. My personal experience is the bio-dad rarely harms the kids. Shack-ups, yes, step-dads, yes. But, not dads. Even OJ was a good dad.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: