Jewish Feminist: Holocaust Survivors “Judenscheiss”

by W.F. Price on July 21, 2012

We often see white nationalists claiming that feminism is a Jewish invention cleverly designed to attack the white race. If Jews could get white women to hate being mothers and wives, the reasoning goes, then white people will be bred out of existence. A number of people seem to fervently believe this, and think that if only we could erase pernicious Jewish influence white women would magically transform into the angels that animate their febrile fantasies.

Well, sorry folks, but modern political feminism started before the Jews were even emancipated in the UK. When Abigail Adams pushed John Adams to grant suffrage to women shortly after the American Revolution, does anyone think there was some fiendish rabbi whispering in her ear? To assume that women need Jews to tell them to ask for more than they already have is to demonstrate the darkest ignorance about the nature of women.

The psychic forces that contribute to feminism are always simmering under the surface of human society, so feminism will easily emerge under the right conditions. Women will leverage their sexuality for political favoritism when the opportunity arises, just as men will use their political power for access to women when they get the chance. Feminism is simply a politicized form of prostitution whereby women gain favors and privileges en masse by virtue of being sexually desired by men, and nothing else. This is why, year after year, feminists can get away with the spectacularly self-serving and obvious lie that their material accomplishments are so meager because men didn’t “give them the opportunity” (i.e. give them more money, power, etc.).

In the following article, titled “Breaking Bad Karma,” a Jewish feminist who writes for Jezebel goes on a really nasty rant about her grandparents’ generation, essentially calling them moral degenerates and spiritually sick. She uses AMC’s Breaking Bad to draw a comparison between Jews and Walt, the show’s meth-cook protagonist:

I wondered if anyone had alerted Hitler that in the event that the final solution didn’t pan out, only the handful of Jews who actually fulfilled the stereotype of the Judenscheisse (because every group has a few) would remain to carry on the Jewish race—conniving, indestructible, taking and taking. My grandparents were not excluded from this suspicion. The same year, during a family dinner conversation about Terri Schiavo, my father made the serious request that should he fall into a vegetative state, he would like for us to keep him on life support indefinitely. Today he and I are estranged for a number of other reasons that are all somehow the same reason.

[...]

…Walt and Breaking Bad express one of our most inherent psychological fallacies: the ability to do any number of consciously reprehensible things while persisting in considering ourselves the protagonist at all times. From world wars to breaking hearts, we cling to the destruction done to us in the past as a justification for the destruction we will cause in the future.

The above is no different from the Anglo feminist who spouts hateful nonsense in a gender studies class about the “evil Christian patriarchy”; you know, the one that nurtured her and built the institutions she uses to denounce her kinsmen. Or the Irish Catholic feminist, like Mary Daly, who does her best to undermine her folk and religion. Or the black feminist, like Oprah, who funds some of the most awful fictional portrayals of black men out there today. There are so many examples that it would be easy to fill a page off the top of my head if I went on.

Feminists can’t help but try to tear down their own people, no matter who they are. It’s a shameful impulse, but so common that anyone who is familiar with it can instantly recognize the pattern. The reason for this behavior is that the tribe demands sacrifices from its women that they often don’t want to make. Under ethnocentrism of any sort, which is and has always been the human norm, women have an obligation to be good wives and mothers; not to kill their children, fool around with the strangers, have fun at the community’s expense, etc. However, lots of women – especially feminists – really feel resentful about this. So what do they do? Naturally, they trash their tribe in an effort to provide a justification for not doing their duty. When feminists attack their own people, it is just a means to rationalize their disobedience and lack of loyalty. They don’t need anyone to convince them to feel this way, because it’s human nature to be selfish, and no women – not even Jewish ones – are immune from that tendency.

{ 98 comments… read them below or add one }

cybro July 21, 2012 at 08:55

There is no one to blame for feminism other than women themselves. They are the ones who are signing on to the program in mass when given the opportunity. I say they can have it and each other. Just don’t come whining to me about how men should man up and marry these burned out career sluts after they are well passed their expiration dates.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 70 Thumb down 9
Zorro July 21, 2012 at 09:02

Brilliant analysis!

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 26 Thumb down 12
Michael July 21, 2012 at 09:23

Jewish socio-cultural-economic might sure jumped on the bandwagon of feminism. Prove me wrong. Just because someone doesn’t start something, it doesn’ t mean he can’t highjack it. French revolution anyone?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 58 Thumb down 15
Deus July 21, 2012 at 09:28

Jews don’t do themselves any favours when they come out with stuff like this:

“Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode. Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation Europe will not survive.”

- Barbara Spectre

You can see what she says here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA7Ymki71fM&feature=related

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 62 Thumb down 8
Dudeist Priest Applicant July 21, 2012 at 09:37

Where white people go, Jews go. Outside of Israel, the majority of Jews marry non-Jews. They’re growing smaller in numbers. It’s well known that it’s the men driving this. Jewish men on average do pretty well, career-wise. And Jewish women do tend to be very feminist-y(misandric) on average. As for Israel – within the perimeter of the IDF(ie including Gazza and the west bang,) there are 50% Muslims. With many Muslims just on the outskirts who consider themselves Palestinian. It’s obvious that this state won’t last. Israelis, culturally, are western. Jews shoot themselves in the foot just as much as white people do.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 4
Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 09:44

Not to be one to stereotype, but despite Jew’s alleged higher I.Q.s their feminists still resort to citing TV shows to bolster their research claims.

You would think Jewesses of all people would understand that TV dramas are complete fabrications and do not represent the physical universe.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 61 Thumb down 8
Rebel July 21, 2012 at 09:44

I, too, believe that feminism has always been there, waiting for an opportunity to manifest itself.
Now the the “cat is out of the bag”, I do not think it will get back anytime soon.

Men will just have to cope with feminist women from now on. Maybe the best course of action for men is to become masculists.

But I doubt it will ever happen. Biology will always prevail over reason.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 4
dragnet July 21, 2012 at 09:46

“Under ethnocentrism of any sort, which is and has always been the human norm, women have an obligation to be good wives and mothers; not to kill their children, fool around with the strangers, have fun at the community’s expense, etc. However, lots of women – especially feminists – really feel resentful about this.”

Nailed it. Another great piece. But this graph also illustrates why any ethnocentrism always carries with it the germ of political feminism.

I’ll say it again here—white nationalism is DOA because WNs are some of the worst pedestalizers of (white) women around. They are easily among the most gynocentric folks in this part of the internet. Any brand of race-based nationalism necessarily emphasizes increasing birth rates and so quite naturally evolves into goddess worship and fertility cult.

I can’t count how many articles I’ve read by WNs extolling the beauty of the white “Aryan” woman or lamenting it’s debasement by blacks. Or pleading for her to maintain her “purity” (purity? srsly?). Or presenting “scientific” studies “proving” that white women are the most beautiful on the planet. And so on.

This inveterate pedestalization has real world consequences. Savage human rights violations were committed because of this: the first victims of the false rape industry in this country where black men lynched by white guys on the false accusations of white women. Even looking at a white woman was enough to get you killed. White birth rates are falling–but WNs blame Mexican illegals instead of the more relevant culprit: that white women are putting off child bearing to fuck around. The biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women—but because WNs worship the pussy, they can’t confront them and so rail against minorities instead. I could go on.

White nationalists (like traditional conservatives) are really just feminists by another name and most of these AFCs are a blowjob away from supporting VAWA. To the extent that the manosphere is counter-feminist, they have no place here.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 69 Thumb down 25
Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 09:56

To be fair, as Breaking Bad is filmed in my neighborhood Hermann and I enjoy watching.

I’ve been thinking about getting a “snub nose” like Walt carries, and have toyed with a Spearhead essay idea hiliting Walt’s wardrobe titled : WWWWW (What Would Walter White Wear?), similar to my Employment Game tutorials.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 17 Thumb down 4
Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 10:06

In fact, here is a take from the photo shoot for the proposed fashion essay :

http://www.the-spearhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/wwwww.jpg

I got the Bill Blass jacket at “Burlington Coat Factory” for $30.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
Attila July 21, 2012 at 10:14

There is nothing that can be linked monocausally to anything else – but to try to take out Jewish influence (numbers, level of representation and media exposure) out modern feminism is simply ludicrous. Surely- post-Protestant Anglo-Saxon influence has been equally strong, but considering their numbers -their influence has been disproportionately high.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 9
JD July 21, 2012 at 10:16

As far as I can tell, “feminism” is a euphemism for “daddy issues”.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 7
Anonymous age 70 July 21, 2012 at 10:20

Who does not lust after those beautiful white women in the USA? There are billions of tons of them waddlng around as we speak. Hot Day-am!!!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 6
Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 10:27

Speaking of Narrative Mills, the “cougars” are back. It’s called “empowerment”, and it’s time the women get their turn :

Women In Their 40s Are Having Great Sex… Just Not With Their Husbands

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samantha-parent-walravens/women-in-their-40s-having_b_1670101.html

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 2
walking in hell July 21, 2012 at 10:46

@price

Nice analysis.

From what I have seen, Jewish men suffer heinous emotional abuse from their wives. In the divorce courts Jewish men are often crushed with stipulations that often destroy a lifetime of hard work and drive them to desperation.

Example of a poor Jewish victim here:
http://abcnews.go.com/US/arizona-family-murder-suicide-dad-brain-tumor/story?id=16518456

Jewish women have a tendency to be very domineering, naive, and talkative, which makes them a perfect vehicle for propagating a destructive doctrine such as feminism. Example: Gloria Steinem. White nationals have a tendency to confuse the propagators with the crafters of the message.

Then there is the tendency of the white nationals to confuse Zionism with Judaism. Yes, it is true that the mainstream media which propagates feminism is mostly Zionist owned. But REAL Judaism is firmly opposed to feminism or any other doctrine which would destroy family structure and order which places the man firmly at the head of the family.

Who are the most famous patriarchs? Abraham, Issac, Jacob, Moses, David, Solomon, and others: all Jews, all very masculine, all leaders, and all of whom would be appalled at what feminism has done to male authority, men’s rights, and families.

Who was one of the most evil women in the Jewish religion? Jezebel. Jezebel was constantly trying to destroy the Jewish prophet Elijah. Interestingly the Old Testament is often accused of being sexist and misogynistic.

If we used the Jewish book of Leviticus to run society, feminism would be considered as a heresy or witchcraft, and there would be stonings of rebellious feminist women day and night.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 9
Lyn87 July 21, 2012 at 10:52

Attila,

I was going to give you and upvote just for using the word monocausally in a sentence, but I had to forbear because I think your premise is skewed. You note that Jewish women were disproportionately involved in pushing (2nd-Wave) feminism, but this is akin to the Apex Fallacy that feminists fall for: “The proof of the Patriarchy is that men are in charge.”

If I’m reading you correctly, you are suggesting that the evidence of some level of “Jewishness” in feminism is that Jewish women were disproportionately in the feminist vanguard. Correct me if I’m inferring something you’re not implying: I don’t want to put words in your mouth.

We all recognize that the “logic” behind feminism is the Apex Fallacy: but just because most of the people who are in charge are men does not mean that men – as a group – are in charge. The vast majority of us are not in charge of anything outside of our immediate sphere.

Likewise, although the leaders of 2nd-Wave feminism were disproportionately Jewish does not mean that feminism is a disproportionately Jewish enterprise.

Although the leaders of modern feminism were Jewish beyond their representation in the overall populace, they are ALL female (male “feminist leaders” are, at best, strap-hangers to the movement).

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 17 Thumb down 20
walking in hell July 21, 2012 at 10:55

@dragnet
“I’ll say it again here—white nationalism is DOA because WNs are some of the worst pedestalizers of (white) women around.”

Yep.

Of all the would-be white knight heroes out there, white nationalists have to be the biggest. They are the ones who assume any type sexual transgression by a woman is automatically the mans fault; they are the ones who would lynch a man (black or white) simply because the woman “claimed” the man raped them.

In the white nationalist’s mind, he wants to be marching in formation into glorious battle with all those chaste, innocent, and long-suffering women patiently waiting for him in the Homeland. These guys are naive clowns. Most women, especially white, Anglo-Saxon, women are rotten and can’t be trusted.

Feminism and misandry is a men’s problem. It does not matter what race or religion the man is. In the “white” countries feminism is a bigger problem, because of those white women.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 10
W.F. Price July 21, 2012 at 10:55

There is nothing that can be linked monocausally to anything else – but to try to take out Jewish influence (numbers, level of representation and media exposure) out modern feminism is simply ludicrous. Surely- post-Protestant Anglo-Saxon influence has been equally strong, but considering their numbers -their influence has been disproportionately high.

-Attila

But then you could argue that because Jews have had disproportionately high influence in almost all intellectual/cultural trends over the past 50-odd years, there are bound to be a lot of Jewish women involved in vocal and public feminism. And then you have to wonder whether the influence on feminism has been Jewish, or the influence on Judaism feminist. It never just goes one way, you know, and I think Ms. Breslaw pretty much proves that.

I mean, how on earth could this be “good for the Jews?”

Buddy Guy July 21, 2012 at 10:58

If white nationalists want us to go against every group that has a high concentration of misandrists, then they should want us to go against white nationalists. Considering, you know, they hate most men and pedestalize white women. I’m a MRA, therefore I stand in the way of white nationalism.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 11
universe July 21, 2012 at 11:04

Yes, in agreement somewhat with the comment suggesting that the potential for go-girl-politics, as isolated and infrequently acted out, has always been part of the social landscape. The girls do stick together and support one another and if conditions allow more territory to dominate they, the more self-righteously rebelious ones, will do it.

Historicaly, from around the 1940s early famed proponents of 20th century feminism had direct ties to communism, Soviet style. And many red feminists weren’t alone in infiltrating all strata of government. This counts heavily as a factor in the perpetuation of non-sensical un-Constitutional directives that leave many scratching their collective heads today.
Then factor in soft-headed whiteknightery in its many forms from the financier on down to the man on the street as binding elements for feminism’s artificial trajectory into world affairs. Regular readers of manblog sites that have provided data and links to data very well know that feminism alone can not stand on its own. It’s own data is unsupported by fact but supported by those as delusional and conniving by providing funds and emotion to intimidate others with.

Antidote? Challenge with fact at hand at any opportunity. And utilize your more aware friends while doing so. Feminism has already been neutered for decades through academic peer review. Irrationality and emotion are its main sustainers outside of other people’s money.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 5
InT July 21, 2012 at 11:06

Yeah, you have to almost be a feminist to believe that feminism is good for the Jews. Sort of reinforces the point about “white knight nationalists.”

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 12
Buddy Guy July 21, 2012 at 11:09

By the way, Jews are the least hegemonic cultural group on the planet. Hassidic Jews(the future of Jews – check your demographic shifts,) assimilating orthodox Jews, secular Jews, Jews for Jesus, conservative Jews, Liberal Jews, Persian and “Arab” Jews (Moroccan, Iraqi, Yeminite, Tunisian, Syrian … they count for a couple million in Israel,) Ethiopean Jews, American, Israeli(obviously existing in every step of the socio-economic ladder,) French, British, German, Russian, Canadian, Australian, Mexican, Latino ….

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 17 Thumb down 11
El Bastardo July 21, 2012 at 11:09

Naturally, they trash their tribe in an effort to provide a justification for not doing their duty. When feminists attack their own people, it is really just a means to rationalize their disobedience and lack of loyalty. They don’t need anyone to convince them to feel this way, because it’s human nature to be selfish, and no women – not even Jewish ones – are immune to that tendency.
-Price

Reading this I came to a conclusion that feminism got what it is after. It has truly become something that transcends all barriers, demographics, race, religions and creeds. Simultaneously convincing everyone the Nazis runnning the show are saints.

Hopefully its painful and tumultuously slow climb to the top will be eclipsed only by its very unprestigious crash straight back to where it came from. I only hope that the taste is made more sweet by as many of the psychotic witches that nurished going with it at the same time.

Nonsense like this pisses me off.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 4
walking in hell July 21, 2012 at 12:12

@ uncle elmer
“Women In Their 40s Are Having Great Sex… Just Not With Their Husbands”

This article is despicable. The whole tone of the article is that women are catching up in the infidelity competition with men; as if that is somehow a “noble” achievement.

Look at some of these quotes:

“Whether her husband cheated, lost a job, made a bad investment or got caught in a lie, a woman feels hurt and betrayed when trust has been broken.”

“I needed confirmation that I was still sexy and that other men found me attractive.”

“I felt like I was doing something just for me. I was sick of living for others. It wasn’t hard to keep the affair secret from my husband because I travel a lot for work.”

This article should be required reading for ALL American men contemplating marriage and children.

The conspiracy theorist in me makes me think that by writing articles like this one, some powerful group is trying to drastically reduce population; because no sane man would marry and have children in a society filled with women like this article describes.

What a cesspool society we live in.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 12:25

Also, my son Shemp has shacked up with one of the cast extras, who appeared in an early season “wild party” scene.

Just sayin’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3
sid July 21, 2012 at 12:36

” Nailed it. Another great piece. But this graph also illustrates why any ethnocentrism always carries with it the germ of political feminism. ”

1st. Then why did it take take so long for feminism to show up after thousands of years of ethnocentric and nationalism? Plus it seems like the timeframe of feminism being predominant in everyday life is a bleep compared to nationalism/ethnocentrism/tribalism’s lifetime of predominance at least in western civ.

2nd. The rise of feminism is coincidental and have resulted mostly after the fall of ethnocentric/tribalism in the west.

3rd. Feminism is (at least was till the spread of western influence) invisible in tribal/ethnocentric societies throughout history whether that be the tribe of new guinea or Muslim brotherhood of egypt, pasthun tribes, chechen tribes, african tribes, indian subcontinent, china, pre-ww2 european reactionary movements and the more traditional european societies like eastern europe and southern european societies pre-ww2.

4th. Feminism has no place in traditional societies, women have a place in the ideals of these movements/societes and it’s inside the home where the majority of their roles lie. In tribal/ethnocentric model it’s a given that the role of men supercedes the role of women in social and cultural hierarchy and the essential roles of the sexes are separate and are distinct paradigms of their own.

While the tendency for feminist type thinking/idealogy exists under the surface in all human groups ( but then thousand sof other suicidal tendencies exist benath our skin ) and gynocentric phenomenon has in some cases afflicted previous non western civilizations ( mostly ancillary light gynocentrism ) modern feminism is a product of the post ethnocentric/tribal west. Basically feminism in it’s current virulent form is a recent western development peculiar to the west and has been ascendant due to the distinct cultural/social/political development in the west in a time of receding ethnocentric/nationalistic tendencies. It’s interesting to note that feminism is foreign and seems weird to people outside of the west who are undoubtedly ultra ethnocentric/nationalist compared to westerners.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 3
sestamibi July 21, 2012 at 12:42

So true, but if our Tribe didn’t invent feminism, we sure went overboard in buying into it, with disastrous results as you describe.

My maternal grandparents came over from Russia separately at the turn of the 20th Century. They met on the Lower East Side, married and had three kids, who produced five grandchildren, and only four great-grandchildren. One of the latter (my nephew) is the product of a mixed marriage–27 and single, one (my son) is low functioning autistic, and the other two are married to non-Jewish women, whereabouts unknown, and parent status unknown.

In addition to all that, practically none of my female cousins have any kids, or even bothered to get married at all.

You can see where this is headed.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
Anonxcf July 21, 2012 at 12:42

This is an excellent piece, 10/10.

I understand WHY a white nationalist, or for that matter a racial segregationalist of ANY race, would seek to blame another race for their woes. Tying a gender-supremacy movement that is in favor of legal inequality to an “out-group” makes things easier, allows you to lump the destructors (or perceived destructors) of your society into the same category of “villain”. It also helps because you can excuse the members of your “racial in-group”- in this case, there is the idea that without some form of “outside” influence, the “white women would do their jobs” or something.

Anyway, good call out.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 8
American July 21, 2012 at 12:43

Now that the white gender, Gender-Raunch community have used American law enforcement’s “Manufactured statistics” to Inflame their way to Empowerment, where are they taking us??
For example, every-time an American law enforcement officer uses “protocol perversions and semantics games” to arrest an innocent man on a false accusation of domestic violence, it leaves a “manufactured statistic” that the gender, Gender-Raunch community use to “Inflame” their way to Empowerment. Are these perversions that have become routine in American law enforcement that serve to “Empower Gender-Raunch” even constitutional???

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 12
sid July 21, 2012 at 12:43

The reason i think that some WN pedestalize women is because they themselves area a product of western modernity. They have realized and gotten close to their own ethnic and racial instincts and interests but in their disposition they are still operating under some of the leftover tendencies and inclinations of western modernity which they haven’t wholly rejected yet because they feel some of these values are progressive and superior to the values of outsiders since these values are distinct to the modern western civilization to which they belong.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3
Glenn July 21, 2012 at 13:05

I guess the next question is, what percentage of divorce lawyers are Jewish?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
Buddy Guy July 21, 2012 at 13:16

The Hassidic Jewish family in Israel has averaged 7 children per family for 3 decades now. As their numbers explode(10% of the population, 20% of 20 years olds, 30% of newborns,) the Israeli economy is bound to completely collapse. Their leech-ocity makes women look like Japenese businessmen. With enemies all around and within, a weak Israeli economy is the end of Israel. Contrary to popular myth, U.S. financial support constitutes a tiny fraction of the IDF budget. As Israelis are sure to flee, keep in mind that while diaspora Jews(9 million, 5 of which reside in the U.S.) lean left, Israeli jews(5 million) lean right.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 7
Buddy Guy July 21, 2012 at 13:28

As for the “Samson solution,” Israel is 15 miles wide. They can’t nuke their neighbors without nuking themselves. And of course they can’t nuke their many enemies within(1.5 million Arab Israelis, 1.6 million Gaza Arabs, 2.5 million West Bank Arabs.) Zionism failed right when it began, when they failed to secure a piece of land with a vast Jewish majority. The Holocaust retroactively proved their cause just, but they failed. You can’t beat the numbers game. There will be a huge flood of Israelis into the west, especially the U.S. Though the leftist Israelis will be first(this has already been happening.) And of course a sadly ironic movement of Israeli Jews back into Germany(already happening.)

This will shift U.S. Jewish politics greatly.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 5
Eric July 21, 2012 at 13:40

Price:
Feminists are themselves gender supremacists and don’t care about the men of any race, color, or creed.

Most of these WN and other types are doing exactly what religious leaders like Driscoll and Stanton are doing. Driscoll thinks that women would be better if it weren’t for the evil men; the WNs believe that women would better if it weren’t for the men in whatever group they’re scapegoating.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 6
Rmaxd July 21, 2012 at 13:55

Actually the influence of Jews & Jewry is alot more complex & involved then Price lets on …

Feminism is first & foremost A Media Inspired Movement, without the media & corporations shilling their programs to women & feminism, feminism would still be a backwater movement limited to unshaved lesbians

Also most cultural movements are also media driven

As everyone knows, a vast majority of the media is controlled by Jews

So yes, you could say Jews did in fact play a large part in promoting & influencing feminism

I know Price is trying to keep a lid on racism … rather futile attempt to say the least

But Jews have always played a large part in European countries, they were the premiere usuries & bankers in Europe after all

Jews also remain a major force in economic & financial institutes to this day

So yes, Jews did & continue to play a large part in the promotion of Feminism to this day …

Nothing new there, nor is it racist to point out the above

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 7
JoeS July 21, 2012 at 14:19

Do you think anyone serious in the MRM is going to stay on the right side of the ADL and SPLC?

The role of revolutionary ideologues and media controllers in promoting feminist values is vast.

The same ideologues promote open borders, below replacement level birth rates, abortion, and attack traditional patriarchal Christian marriage.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 1
JoeS July 21, 2012 at 14:23
NWOslave July 21, 2012 at 14:27

Feminism like all ism’s are funded from the top down, and all ism’s are a power grab by claiming oppression. Claiming victimhood is the highest claim one can make. All power derives from victimhood in the modern world. Any person or group that has been given the victimhood card can cash that card in for wealth, education, employment, political power, leniency, ect.

Feminism is merely the perfection of ism’s for its ability to be injected into any society. No matter how racially or religiously pure any society is, feminism can divide that society into a nation of oppressors, (men), and victims, (women).

Feminism is beneficial to any country wanting to control all the wealth and have unlimited power over it’s citizens. It takes literally no investment to control the population with feminism. If one woman is attacked in an alley, simply have the paper write up how all women live in fear of being attacked by men. Being the benevolent government I am, I’ll glady take your wealth to ensure the protection of women. If you disagree, I’ll ask you if you want your mother/sister/wife attacked? You’ve lost and I the government have won.

If one woman feels she isn’t given a fair shake in education, have the papers write an article on how the old boys club want to relegate women to second class citizens. Once again, I’m a most benevolent government and I want to see women being treated fairly and compassionately, so I’ll glady take your wealth to give women special access to whatever they demand. If you complain I’ll accuse you of wanting women locked away as stepford wifes. Maybe I’ll cite an example from so far off land from even 200 years ago. Is that what you want? You’ve lost again.

This exact formula works for every occasion and it only takes one woman. Look at, anita sarkeesian for instance. Up until her little tropes against gaming sexism there wasn’t an issue. She alone felt slighted and made a big stink about it. The media gave her a bit of air time so she could notify all women how they’re oppressed. Women weren’t oppressed in games before she enlightened the world that they are oppressed. Now it’s universal womens oppression.

Governments love feminism as the ultimate ism. If any woman complains about any slight to her feelings the govenrment get’s to throw money at the problem, your money. Every man could stop talking the second any women comes within earshot to avoid offending her, somewhere a woman would be offended that this signals men’s refusal to openly communicate, or keeping secrets. Being the benevolent government that I am, we need to throw money at men’s lack of communication and secretive tendencies.

Governments don’t embrace an ism unless they gain wealth and power from it. Feminism is the big enchalada of all ism’s.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 3
Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 14:50

Hermann informs me that there is already a Walter White wardrobe following :

http://www.deoveritas.com/blog/breaking-bad-walter-whites-wardrobe

http://coolmaterial.com/style/decked-out-walter-white

Hell, I been dressing like this for years.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3
Darryl X July 21, 2012 at 15:36

Feminism is a political campaign of hate against men and children. It is the default form of social organizing when 80% of women in a population are “silly” and allow themselves to be manipulated by 20% of men in the same population. Together they conspire to condemn the other 80% of men to the margins of society – poverty and homelessness, prison, death and exile. Feminism is evil. It is the greatest threat to civilization, an affrontery to God and offensive to me. Women of all ethnicities and not just Jews promote it. And it must be destroyed. It and all those who have and continue to promote it. Complaining about it accomplishes nothing except show feminists that they are successful in their oppression of us and it encourages them to impose upon us more. There is no political, legal, social or financial solution to our dilemma. The only solution is the one our forefathers left us: Revolution as an affirmative defense against our government which has visited upon us violence first and without provocation. Our feminist government is simply satisfying its addiction to power and control but it will never be satisfied because there will never be enough power and control to satisfy it. We will never be oppressed enough to satisfy it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
Darryl X July 21, 2012 at 15:44

@ universe -

“Antidote? Challenge with fact at hand at any opportunity. And utilize your more aware friends while doing so.”

I appreciate your spirit but feminists are our oppressors. “Challenge” (like “complaint”) using facts and objective analysis only validates their success in oppressing us and encourages feminists to oppress and impose upon us more. There is no political, legal, social or financial solution to our dilemma. The only solution is the only one our forefathers left us: Revolution as an affirmative defense against our feminist government which has visited upon us violence first and without provocation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
zed July 21, 2012 at 15:46

OT –

The suggestion that Christian Bale, the star of the new Batman film, visit the kids wounded in the Aurora CO shooting, has gone viral around the net.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-social-media-campaign-urges-christian-bale-to-visit-aurora-20120721,0,6977378.story

I think it is a great idea.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 7
anonymous July 21, 2012 at 16:53

Feminism is simply a politicized form of prostitution whereby women gain favors and privileges en masse by virtue of being sexually desired by men, and nothing else

This.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
Ted July 21, 2012 at 17:54

“From world wars to breaking hearts, we cling to the destruction done to us in the past as a justification for the destruction we will cause in the future.”

Even a feminist can make a valid point.

What responsibility do you have for actions done by others, before you even existed?

You can do things only in the present. It’s probably a good idea to plan on avoiding doing destruction in the future.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
No BS July 21, 2012 at 19:42

Feminism is nothing more than a derivative of Marxism. Marxism is nothing more than a derivative of Judaism. To suggest that the Jewish role in the propagandizing, promulgating, and implementation of feminism was minimal; as opposed to the real nature of that role, which was both leading and essential, is simply wrong.
But do not take my word for it. Google it yourself. Check out who the names of leading feminists have been for the last century. Check out who were the leaders of the feminist organizations. Investigate who had control, both then and now, of the newspaper, television, film, magazine, and academic organizations that relentlessly marketed the poison pill of feminism to American society at large; and to women in particular. The whole rotten story is there to be learned, if you care to look.
Does exposing the Jewish puppeter’s hand in this matter mean that women have no culpability for the crimes of feminism? No, of course not. But their culpability is of a different type. Lenin said that all mass movements must have a small leadership core who know and understand the movement’s true agenda and a exponentially larger group who do not know the true agenda, but are supportive of the movement’s publicly asserted, and typically false aims. He tellingly called the larger group “useful idiots”.
That is the role that most women have been unwittingly assigned in the scam of feminism; that of the useful idiot who is supportive of a movement whose true aims and innately destructive nature, both to them and their progeny, are obscured from them.
So what are those aims? The same aim of all populist Marxist movements: DIVIDE and CONQUER. Divide the woman from the man. Divide the man from the woman. Break up the family. Alienate the child from at least one, and preferably both parents. Miseducate the child to hate their ancestors, their heritage, their parents, their world. All in the sacred name of “tolerance and understanding” don’t you know! Destroy the bonds of common faith, family, race, gender, and nation.
In fact, don’t just destroy those bonds; obliterate the common understanding of those concepts so that people are in a constant state of cognitive dissonance.
In a word, atomize society to such a degree that no social entity or group of any size stands between you and total control of your target nation except those clusters of rare individuals who instinctively feel in their gut that despite your best propagandistic efforts, something is not quite on the up and up with your humanist agenda. These rare men (they are always men), also known as Patriots, can be dealt with promptly and efficiently in the aftermath of total Marxist control; as they always are.
This is the Marxist plan. Things seem to be right on schedule.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 10
Keyster July 21, 2012 at 20:29

2nd wave feminists have been predominantly Jewish because they know how best to articulate and exploit a victimhood narrative. And they’ll always have the publishing industry and Hollywood firmly on their side.

There’s BIG MONEY in giving frustrated and bored suburban WASP housewives a reason for their unhappiness. Try and think of a single feminist of major significance in the last 50 years that’s not Jewish. It’s hard to do. Jewish women have excelled at promoting feminism because they’re smarter and more determined than non-Jewish women…they’re also neurotic and solipsistic as hell.

Be aware it was Erich Fromm, Henry Marcuse of the Frankfurt School along with Simone de Beauvoir’s “The Second Sex” (as inspiration for Betty Friedan’s “Feminine Mystique”) that really kicked things off in earnest on college campuses in the 60′s, which precipitated Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine. These are all Secular/Marxist Jews, except for de Beauvoir who was Catholic and then confirmed athiest.

Jewish women are the best lawyers, public relations experts, journalists, actresses and authoresses. Modern Feminism owes itself to the strides of the Jewish woman, many of whom could bury most men of the time in debate.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 6
evilwhitemalempire July 21, 2012 at 20:42

Uncle Elmer July 21, 2012 at 09:44
Not to be one to stereotype, but despite Jew’s alleged higher I.Q.s their feminists still resort to citing TV shows to bolster their research claims.

You would think Jewesses of all people would understand that TV dramas are complete fabrications and do not represent the physical universe.

———————-
they do

they just don’t think that their audience does

and for a good portion of the public they are correct in this assumption

also tv and movies affect the way you think even unconsciously

so that you find yourself internalizing ideas, viewpoints deleterious to you without realizing it

if you watch tv, movies at all do so only in moderation

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire July 21, 2012 at 20:54

Who was one of the most evil women in the Jewish religion? Jezebel. Jezebel was constantly trying to destroy the Jewish prophet Elijah. Interestingly the Old Testament is often accused of being sexist and misogynistic.

If we used the Jewish book of Leviticus to run society, feminism would be considered as a heresy or witchcraft, and there would be stonings of rebellious feminist women day and night.
—————————-
this is why creationists are so critical to holding the line

creationism mandates a strict adherence to scripture

part of that means that stuff in the old testament about women being bad CANNOT be glossed over

without creationism all of christianity will fall to feminism as the more ‘enlightened’ sects, denominations, divisions, etc. already have

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2
Badpoet July 21, 2012 at 22:02

I don’t blame Jews for everything, but I’m just sick and tired of hearing about them all the time. Their influence on American politics and culture is scandalously disporportionate to their numbers. The majority of them have nothing but contempt at best, and hatred at worst, toward Gentiles and especially toward Christians.

I don’t want to exterminate them. I just want them to be held accountable to the same kind of merciless “eye for an eye” justice that they impose upon others, like bloody Shylock.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 6
Karl July 21, 2012 at 22:16

American Jews are declining in population and becoming increasingly more secular. If some conspiracy exists it is perpetrated by the very elites and they have zero racial loyalty unlike faith groups who rely on racial/religious identity to exist. To that extent, there is no incentive for Jewish leaders to perpetuate laws that will diminish their flock. The elites motivation is plain as their only concern is economic growth and the continuation of their own progeny. You don’t need a thriving people to punch out widgets and consume- and when populations decline, just bring the borders down. Broken families and torn societies don’t pose a challenge to the status-quo.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 5
Gamerp4 July 22, 2012 at 00:31

Perhaps after reading all the comments I should also provide my 2 cents in the theory and forward thinking about Jews creating Feminism.

You see many white nationalists and conservative for that matter have pretty much taken to task to attack groups that goes against “White Race” doesn’t matter if most of the white women are going against white patriarchy, for them they think that to Preserve White Race they need White Women to do so, I dont blame them for that its true, but for that to continue they have taken to task to attack MRA’s and many religious outlets altogether, for them WE ARE THE ENEMIES and White women are the VICTIMS :D same thinking, completely forgetting then FEMINISM is up against WHITE, BLACK, BROWN, & YELLOW RACE, hell they are even against Male animals (See: Sarah Hunt, Fraulein Irrgang) :D and IN FEMINISM there is no religious apathy going on (As clearly seen in Jews, Muslims, Christian, Hinduism and even in Mormons) for them it is Gynocentrism that matters, for them male suffering matters, Even in Black communities (Which are badly attacked by feminism and are the one going down the abyss pretty fast) feminism is keeping it phase and reaching to wide public, Look at India, Iran & Egypt for example, It is just Conspiracy Theory of White Nationalist and for that they are happy to throw more “White” men under the bus Just to have their ego boosted.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 7
jaego July 22, 2012 at 02:05

Why would any women want to be a White Nationalist – the most persecuted fragment of the most persecuted people in America?

Some White Nationalists think that Christianity is a Jewish plot. But how do they explain the early believers (many of them Jews) who died for it?

Clearly White Nationalist Women could do better elsewhere. The ones that stick are obviously not ordinary bimbos and gold diggers. If Mr Price would care to come over to Counter Currents, he would find some spirited MRA’s taking on a Feminist named Ava Moretti in some recent articles. We’re not all Zombies marching in lockstep on this issue.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 8
bruno July 22, 2012 at 02:20

Off Topic: in the shooting in Colorado, it already became clear that many guys died because they jumped in front of their shocked and frozen girlfriend, and took the bullets for her.

We still have a long way to go….

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
freebird July 22, 2012 at 04:17

Gender raunch is very good at fomenting divisionism amongst all other demographics,and manufacturing statistics via LEO is the main way they get their talking points.
The only “good man” these days are the ones enforcing the matriarchy.
(Gynocentrism)
“The power of the vagina can be blinding,so use it wisely.”
Actual quote.
Ah well the line starts in the garage and works it’s way through the living room,guys.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 9
Darryl X July 22, 2012 at 04:54

@ Badpoet -

“I don’t blame Jews for everything, but I’m just sick and tired of hearing about them all the time.”

This phenomenon is called “Jew fatigue”. I’m the same way. I’ve spent forty-four years of my life listening to stories about the plight of the Jews. At the expense of many more important information. I don’t hate Jews and I certainly don’t promote their extermination. But they could use a better publicity manager. Their chronic victimhood narrative wore out for me more than thirty years ago. It no longer elicits sympathy from me but instead elicits a sense of annoyance. Whenever I encounter a story about how the Jews are persecuted, it doesn’t take much research or investigation to find that the Jews themselves instigated the problem in the first place. I don’t think many of them read the Old Testament. If they did, they wouldn’t be experiencing the problems that they are.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 1
Darryl X July 22, 2012 at 05:25

@ keyster -

“…they’re also neurotic and solipsistic as hell.”

Jewish women and all women for that matter are not “neurotic”. They are “psychotic”.

Neuroisis implies turning your anxiety against yourself. Cutting, suicide, trichotilomania, nail-biting, etc… Neurosis requires and promotes personal discipline. Neurosis is when you blame yourself for someone else stabbing you in the back with a pair of butcher knives.

Psychosis implies turning it against everyone else. False allegations, projection, homicide, compulsive pathological lying, etc… Psychosis is mutually exclusive of personal discipline. Psychosis is when you blame the person you stabbed in the back with a pair of butcher knives for you stabbing them.

As a relevant aside, I had visited Manboobz a while back and one of the wretches there had explained to me (scolded me rather) that Thomas Ball is responsible for his own suicide. He is to blame. Not someone else. With which I agreed. I never suggested otherwise. Although he is to blame for his suicide, feminists are to blame for the avoidable and preventable and unnecessary circumstances which inspired Thomas Ball to kill himself and from which he could get no relief.

Thomas Ball is neurotic and killed himself because of the unbearable circumstances imposed upon him by feminists. Snatching his children, stealing all the money necessary for him to support himself, denying his civil and Constitutional rights, etc… The feminists left him with no means to survive in any way but misery.

The feminists who imposed themselves upon Thomas Ball for profit and entertainment fail to acknowledge their direct imposition upon him and fail to acknowledge its real consequences for him and their responsibility for them. Worse though is that they blame Thomas Ball for killing himself after they did all those horrible things to him and providing him no opportunity for relief.

Their lack of empathy, compassion, responsibility, etc… shows that they are decisively psychotic. Sometimes psychosis is the result of forces either beyond our control like schizophrenia or are at least of external origin like the acute effects of a particular drug. But other times psychosis is a choice born of all the decisions we’ve made in the past and all the lies we’ve told ourselves to absolve ourselves of responsibility for our own behavior. To protect ourselves from the consequences of our own guilt. Or the real practical and legal or social consequences of it.

That is what feminism is. It’s evil because it’s a choice. Those feminists, mostly women, destroyed Thomas Ball by doing every evil thing to him they could. And then when he finally and unsurprisingly killed himself, they failed to take any responsibility for their behavior and say that he is responsible for killing himself. And it’s true he is. But they are responsible for everything else. And their failure to acknowledge that connection is what makes them psychotic.

It’s like saying I didn’t kill a man when I shot him. Instead the bullet killed him. Well, yes that’s true. But I pulled the trigger and released the bullet. I’ve often times been alarmed at the short-sightedness and lack of understanding about cause and effect that feminists demonstrate. They are able to absolve themselves of responsibility by narrowing their frame of reference oconcerning a sequence of events to exclude their involvement and to absolve themselves of any responsibility. It’s chilling.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 3
Tam the Bam July 22, 2012 at 06:14

“(ie including Gazza and the west bang,) “ Love it! Haven’t heard owt about the old jakey, since that carry on with Moatie and the KFC bucket.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
American July 22, 2012 at 06:24

I have seen signs of the waning of American Gender-Raunch Empowerment establishment.
The first break in the gender-Raunch empowerment juggernaut will be that American law enforcement’s “misinformation and manufactured statistics Alliance” will start to break down.
After this first perversion (which is the greatest and most influential), then all the small University empowerment circles that relied on this “manufactured statistics Alliance” to Inflame the public, will have very little to “Inflame” the public with, and will slowly lose altitude.
The question for me is what will American universities look like “Post Gender-Raunch”???

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 14
crella July 22, 2012 at 06:58

A TV program, about a fictional character whose portrayal may or may not be an accurate portrayal of how human beings react to a cancer diagnosis, is her basis for ‘justification’ of her feelings towards Holocaust survivors? She begrudges her father’s wish to have life-prolonging measures used?

‘Twisted’ ‘sick’ ‘hollow’ ‘shallow’, ‘idiotic’ and ‘cold’ don’t even begin to touch this…..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
Lovekraftr July 22, 2012 at 07:42

This movement we are involved in is unique in that it brings together independent outsiders trying to create a cohesive ideology in the face of massive social opposition.

This explains why it is so enriching to be involved in it, as opposed to being part of the liberal choir-preaching sheepcrowd.

Observers of the MRM at its infancy know that what once made us reel in righteous indignation is now being treated with quick analysis.

The current stage is the MRM taking the battle to the feminists and progressives.

Next stage is anyone’s guess.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Opus July 22, 2012 at 08:16

One of W.F.’s most powerful essays.

Dipping into British social history any time before the Nineteenth century reveals at every turn that women organised their lives and their business opportunities without hindrance. A visit to Youtube and a search for turn of the (19th) century film footage of buses going over London Bridge and in the City reveals an almost equal number of females riding the open top buses. There can only be one reason for their presence in the city and that is that they worked there in the offices. It is true that they were indeed excluded from the professions, the officer class of the armed services and the church, but that was the de facto situation for 99% of the male population anyway. The remaining one per cent of women far from being deprived, were actually being pedestalled, and enabled to spend their entire lives in ease and leisure.

The origins of feminism must thus be traced to the Enlightenment and of course various men including Jews picked up on the idea that the family being the principle economic unit and thus the mainstay of capitalism was ‘Oppressing the workers’. The idea much loved by Godwin – who fantasized and end to sexual desire (much mocked by Malthus) and Condorcet and John Stuatrt Mill – was inevitably attractive to Marx.

Marx saw everything in terms of class; Freud in terms of infantile sexuality; and Schoenberg in the equality of tones – all three are off-beam. Personally I have always on a personal and professional basis never had any cause to complain about members of the tribe indeed I have always found them intelligent and charming though I have no time for their self-serving stories of victimisation.

I particularily like the last paragraph. Defining what Feminism does to dehumanise and decivilise women is important so that it may be recognised (in Daly and Oprah and others) for what it is and for its pernicious influence.

A woman who kills her offspring, is sexually promiscous and shows disloyalty to her own people deserves no especial consideration.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Charles Martel July 22, 2012 at 08:35

bruno
Off Topic: in the shooting in Colorado, it already became clear that many guys died because they jumped in front of their shocked and frozen girlfriend, and took the bullets for her.

I have read of two instances of this in the Colorado shooting. This altruism is not cultural, it’s genetic. These men did not plan these actions, they just did it.

This genetic altruism is why feminism is such a problem for us. My teenage son has received a full education on the nature of women from me. Even so, he’s having a really difficult time suppressing his inner white knight.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
W.F. Price July 22, 2012 at 09:19

I have read of two instances of this in the Colorado shooting. This altruism is not cultural, it’s genetic. These men did not plan these actions, they just did it.

This genetic altruism is why feminism is such a problem for us. My teenage son has received a full education on the nature of women from me. Even so, he’s having a really difficult time suppressing his inner white knight.

-Charles Martel

That’s right. It’s instinctive. As much as I’ve discovered about women’s nature, I’ve realized there are certain things about men’s that will never change, either — including my own. For example, I’m certain that I’d shove my kids behind me in this kind of situation, putting myself between them and danger without even thinking about it. That’s just something men do instinctively. They’ll often even do it for their male friends.

In emergencies men’s true nature reveals itself because they don’t have time to consciously think about what they are doing.

This is yet one more reason it’s so truly evil to deny children their fathers’ presence. When the chips are down, most men will not hesitate to protect those they love. It’s what we do.

As for your son, I’d recommend focusing on discernment, and telling him to wait until the hormones calm down (usually this happens by the late 20s) before making any life-decisions. Also, get him used to the idea of contracts. Sometimes, simply proposing a contract to a woman is enough to smoke out the ones who are holding onto the option of betrayal. I’m pretty sure if I’d proposed one before getting married my ex and her mother would have shown their true colors a lot sooner. Negotiating the details with women really brings out the ugly in them, and even a love-struck young man won’t be able to ignore that.

Charles Martel July 22, 2012 at 09:52

W. F. Price
As for your son, I’d recommend focusing on discernment, and telling him to wait until the hormones calm down (usually this happens by the late 20s) before making any life-decisions. Also, get him used to the idea of contracts. Sometimes, simply proposing a contract to a woman is enough to smoke out the ones who are holding onto the option of betrayal. I’m pretty sure if I’d proposed one before getting married my ex and her mother would have shown their true colors a lot sooner. Negotiating the details with women really brings out the ugly in them, and even a love-struck young man won’t be able to ignore that.

Really good advice. Looking back on my life I’m shocked at how often I put my own self-interest second to the interests of other people. Partly because I grew up in the last decades of cultural chivalry, but also partly because I felt something was “the right thing to do.”

The #1 lesson I’ve tried to get across to my son is – “Be selfish, always put your own self-interest first. Don’t let anyone shame you into manning-up to something you don’t really want to do.”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2
Rob July 22, 2012 at 09:53

Sometimes, simply proposing a contract to a woman is enough to smoke out the ones who are holding onto the option of betrayal. I’m pretty sure if I’d proposed one before getting married my ex and her mother would have shown their true colors a lot sooner. Negotiating the details with women really brings out the ugly in them, and even a love-struck young man won’t be able to ignore that. — WF Price

This is a good strategy. I had a similar thing happen to me once and it saved my bacon, although it wasn’t directly about a contract. I was dating a single mom and she was pressing me to move in together. Finally I told her I was concerned that if we lived together for two years, that I could be held liable for child-support for her son.

Well! That sure brought out the gorgon in her! I was mean and spiteful and hated women and children… and then she told me what an idiot I was because it wasn’t two years, it was only a year and a half!

“Thanks for the hissy-fit, dear! By the way, I don’t think we are a good ‘fit.’ See ya!”

She had another guy already waiting in the wings anyway, and they moved in together shortly after. There was no need for me to feel angry or jealous… karma will punish him accordingly. “Thanks for taking one for civilization, Bubba. Somebody had to do it… and better it was you than me!”

In the meantime since this has happened, in my province, the time limit for living together has dropped all the way down to a mere six months, and now even that is being challenged and over-turned. They are saying that any man who exhibits “parenting” towards the child should be held liable for support… so, that means taking the kid fishing or camping, watching sporting events, picking them up from school, and so on. Basically the only way to circumvent this is to be a cold-hearted child abuser who completely ignores the child that is living with him.

Since women don’t understand cause and effect very well, they all think it is a great idea… but can’t figure out why men are becoming more reluctant to share their nice homes with momma and her spawn and insist she keeps living separately from him down in the projects.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 3
Darryl X July 22, 2012 at 11:37

@ Martel -

I think a better way of expressing the importance of your own well-being is that you can’t help anybody else if you can’t help yourself first (as long as you’re not imposing upon anybody else).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
Darryl X July 22, 2012 at 11:54

Expanding on my post above Darryl X July 22, 2012 at 05:25

Here’s how feminists interpret in the most short sighted way to rationalize their own egregious misconduct and implicate fathers in the alleged abandonment of their children and families:

A woman commits adultery. Her husband finds out. He doesn’t tell her he knows. Then during an argument she starts about something completely innocuous and inconsequential, he confronts her about her adultery and how it’s worse than her current complaint and identifies and condemns her hipocracy. She then walks across the house and collects the two largest butcher knives from their drawer of cutlery in the kitchen and returns to the other end of the house and attempts to kill him with the butcher knives. In the back no less. Then she accuses him of causing her to try and kill him. Over the next three months, she continues on with her adulterous relationship and keeps alienating their children from their father (her husband). Snatching them from his physical custody at every opportunity and the such. Then she leaves him for the other man, lies in court that their father abused the her and the children to get a restraining order for 2.5 yrs. Falsifies police reports that he violated the restraining order and has him sent to jail many times. Continues with her adulterous relationship. Gets full legal and physical custody and so much child support that her husband and the children’s father is condemned to poverty the rest of his life. And so much support that he can’t even afford to see his children, especially after she moves across country (2,500 miles away). Then she files for divorce, finally. Then she accuses her ex-husband and father of their children of abandoning their family and the children because he can’t see the children. That’s psychopathy. That’s psychosis. That’s extremely short-sighted thinking that feminists use to rationalize their horrible behavior and to absolve themselves of the responsibility of their own behavior. This behavior is normal for women. I’ve never met a woman who does not think this way. It’s frightening. It’s not neurosis.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
universe July 22, 2012 at 11:57

Darryl X

I appreciate your spirit but feminists are our oppressors. “Challenge” (like “complaint”) using facts and objective analysis only validates their success in oppressing us and encourages feminists to oppress and impose upon us more. There is no political, legal, social or financial solution to our dilemma. The only solution is the only one our forefathers left us: Revolution as an affirmative defense against our feminist government which has visited upon us violence first and without provocation.

– I’ll have to admit that being the eternal optimist in the face of total affront to common sense and nature that is feminism’s legacy may appear naive, futile or even outwardly stupid given the odds seemingly in their favour. Considering the falling in the self-described latter categories above is not about to limit my enthusiasm. In the short period of this site’s being and of the increased participation of commentary in exposing fraud feminism only increases my resolve to remain vigilant, stupidly or otherwise. Many talented individuals are gathered here and abroad with much of their reasoning skills being truely impressive. I can only wish to emulate such abilities.

The outward display of revulsion to the nonsense that passes for ‘gender’ equality and that attention is rightfully insisted to revolve around the men’s side of the same privilege is a rudimentary beginning to a due spin in the politcal axis. The change agents of the early eastern colonies operated in similar fashion under similar circumstances – making the case for a seemingly impossible succession from the unweilding and gaining adherents to their reasoning from such. If no voices spoke no others would have heard. For them as well as us other people will get onboard when it is reasonable for them to do so. Let those onboard revolve their activity in ten thousand different lawful ways. Sheer numbers are difficult to stop and we are heading toward achieving those numbers. With each submission from the capable and talented among us.

When research professor of Cultural Studies and English Literature at Trent University in Ontario and author of “Moral Panic; Biopolitics Rising” was asked live-on-air whether he suffered any base reprisals from his expose of feminist created non-sense he replied with, “No, surprisingly, I haven’t”.
My experiences with pro-male activism was similar. I too have witnessed the blank stares, sparse rebuttals and would be opponents physically running away from my mere lesser than academic presence. I know that countervailing ideas to feminism’s weak platform is tolerated and somewhat respected, regardless of feminism’s weak foundational but popular support. Who cares what they think anyway. Perhaps my limited experiences have clouded my judgements in optimism but sense that many others could do and experience likewise, but whenever they’ve resolved to do so.

Enjoyed your contributions to this thread.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
freebird July 22, 2012 at 12:59

Anybody looking for a definition of “gender raunch” need go no further than the michfest forums.
Crazy writings of witchcraft,amazonian rituals,and wiccian rituals.
Oddly enough,they do allow men, but only to bring the portajohns (janes)
and firewood,and to remove the garbage and sewage.
This is gender raunch.
And no, I,m not a sockpuppet, I’ve come to see the beauty in American’s insistence upon a standardized term.

Even if it does cause eyes to gloss over when used in complex sentences that express excellent ideas that are tough to read due to the syntax.

But the fact is still there:
It is the militant rad-fem lesbians that are parting the resistance to suzy rottencrotch.

Why not refer to these “mass castrating,ball busting bull dykes” as gender raunch.
It seems to be a polite enough term for something far uglier.
I would call them maggots,or something to that effect.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3
freebird July 22, 2012 at 13:07

“That’s right. It’s instinctive. As much as I’ve discovered about women’s nature, I’ve realized there are certain things about men’s that will never change, either — including my own. For example, I’m certain that I’d shove my kids behind me in this kind of situation, putting myself between them and danger without even thinking about it. That’s just something men do instinctively. They’ll often even do it for their male friends. ”

That’s why playing the eternal victim card works.
Raype!
That’s why I refer to the GNP as the all rape channel.
It’s sure way to pit men against men.
Works almost every time,as men are universally against rape.
Most men would risk their lives to stop a rape in progress.
Fortunately,it doesn’t happen any more often than manslaughter.
How many women have intervened
to stop a manslaughter?
Yeah, that’s what I thought.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Keyster July 22, 2012 at 13:50

This genetic altruism is why feminism is such a problem for us.

It is THE problem.
It’s exactly how feminism came to the fore of social movements.
Ironically men are SO innately altruistic towards women, they’ll even
give women as a group advantage over them (and that of their sons) at their own peril. Men have, and will continue to, sacrifice themselves for women even if it flys directly in the face of their own self-interest…has employees, husbands and fathers.

If men didn’t find so much validation of their manhood in helping women, they’d stop doing it. Sacrificing yourself to help a woman is almost as good as sex.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 2
Art Vandelay July 22, 2012 at 14:15

Thought this was relevant: http://www.henrymakow.com/why_i_didnt_marry_a_jewish_wom.html

As for her article, way to talk about your family. The comments are pretty good though, maybe they just published it for the pageviews. The content stinks and the writing stinks.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Eric July 22, 2012 at 14:25

Jaego:
‘Clearly WN women could do better elsewhere. The ones who stick certainly aren’t bimbos or gold-diggers.’

True, but I would think that the WN community suffers from the same problem as the rest of the feminised west: the ratio of men to women is highly disporportionate.

Again, the problem is that we come up against the math. The entire Anglosphere suffers from a enormous surplus of suitable males against a tiny fraction of females who are capable of sustaining any given culture and making it viable. Add to the mix the high percentage of these females who are reproducing with dysfunctional thuggish males, and you see that nothing short of importing females can turn the situation around.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
Eric July 22, 2012 at 14:33

Rob:
You were lucky to have escaped that one. Every time I hear of stories like this, I thank God for my own narrow escapes!

Whenever someone tells me I should meet a nice American girl and settle down with her, I feel like throwing up on the spot!

‘Since women don’t understand cause and effect very well, they think it’s a great idea.’

I’m afraid that they DO understand it. It gives them a chance to play the ‘victim card’ since no sane man would want them anymore—they don’t have any choice but shack up with abusive thugs (which is what they wanted to do all along).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3
Andrew S. July 22, 2012 at 15:35

The MRA is not going anywhere with white nationalists leading the way. The being said to sugar coat or play down the the impact that Jews have had within the feminist movement is just being intellectually dishonest.

Would there have been a pretty strong modern day feminist movement without Jewish influence. Probably. Would it hold anywhere near the same power without Jewish influence, uh no.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Troll King July 22, 2012 at 15:52

@ Uncle Elmer

I can’t wait to watch the newest episode of breaking bad tonight. Did your son hook up with one of the strippers from, season two or three or whatever, from the scene where jesse spends all of the RV money?

@ the topic of the Colorado shooting.

So what if it is biological? The self-sacrificing instinct of men, that is.

A puppies bred biological nature is to curl up on your lap and be petted until it falls asleep. But, if you mistreat it enough it will change and adapt and bite you or attack you.

The same is true of men. Three men did die to save a woman/gf. I am watching the news right now and apparently one of those guys was married/separated or in the divorce process and he died to protect his gf. His wife/ex-wife is on tv right now attention whoring over his death and the loss to HER kids.

Apparently though there were other men who behaved less “chivalrously”. Apparently one abandoned the girl and HER children (I haven’t figured out whether they are married or together and whether or not they are his kids, so take that into account) and apparently another guy stepped in to save her and the kids.

I think the male protective instinct only goes so far. Most men aren’t going to sacrifice their life over another mans kids. Some will, but many will have their own kids and loved ones to take care of or think about.

On top of that this is just one of a series of accidents/disasters in the last few years where men didn’t sacrifice to save “women and children first.”

Look at the cruise liner that capsized awhile back, the common complaint was that men pushed women and old women especially out of the way to save themselves.

Even taking the mistreatment of men out of the equation, I wonder what it will look like in a disaster when more than 50% of the men are partnered with women who have children with another man. Will those men sacrifice themselves over a single-mother by choice and for some other guys bastard children?

I kinda doubt it. Look at the statistics surrounding stepfathers and mommies boyfriends. They commit more abuse than single men and much more than single fathers and biodads.

Ontop of that we have generational differences. I personally have heard girls and women complain about the lack of chivalry from men and boys since I was in middle school. From what I can tell the next generation coming up is less chivalrist than mine(gen y).

I sure as hell wouldn’t sacrifice myself for a woman. I would more than likely grab the closest woman who looks like a feminist and use her as a human shield, possibly pushing her towards the gunperson.

I would rather be a live coward than a dead hero. From the little bit of cellphone video I have seen it looks like many other guys felt the same way, as it looks like they just bolted for the door instead of protecting the paw lil innocent feminist women. The theatre was packed full of people in my age range.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Darryl X July 22, 2012 at 17:10

@ universe -

“Who cares what they think anyway.”

Thanks. I’ve enjoyed yours too. I agree that we have one thing going for us if nothing else. And that is the corallary (I guess that’s what it is) to your above resolve. That is to say, they don’t think but we do. They do something but I’m not sure what you call it. Whatever you call it, it’s confusing. And that is the difference between freedom and not.

No matter what happens, I understand the Truth (note the capital “T” is not a mis-type). Our adversaries never will. I understand that I can measure something repeatedly within certain tolerances and ascertain a result to which I may assign a term of error. Then I can collect those results together and begin to describe the world by testing hypotheses and making predictions about the future or refining my description of the world around me.

Our adversaries prefer to remain ignorant even though they have the ability to pursue the Truth. Their ignorance is a choice. And the consequences of their ignorance as they impose it upon the rest of us also is a choice. But that doesn’t necessarily make them evil. Just stupid. Here’s what makes them evil. After they have deliberately chosen ignorance and then made decisions which adversely effect others, then they deny their involvement.

And further, they then point fingers of blame and cast aspersions at others to distract from their own evil deeds. And then even further still, they manipulate others with the public spectacle of their chronic victimhood, pretending as if they are the ones who have been wronged. That is evil. Pure evil.

These people descend into the fiery pits of hell, step by step, knowing full well what they are doing and their sloth, denial, blame and then manipulation are each evidence of their deliberation and premeditation to hurt others. These are choices they have made. They have chosen to do evil and they will ultimately suffer the consequences. If not here on Earth then in hell. I am beyond being in a forgiving mood.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Eric July 22, 2012 at 18:15

Worth noting: this afternoon I was in a restaurant and outside the window by the street was one of Seattle’s numerous deadweights holding up a cardboard sign. I saw him go to a new car, talk to somebody through the window, then go back and get his stuff.

Sure enough, a tall blonde walked up to him a minute later, showed him where she was parked, and the two drove off into the sunset together…

Now, there is the problem perfectly illustrated.

Once the legal and social constraints of civilization are removed (what the feminists call ‘liberation from patriarchial standards’), the proclivity of women is to gravitate towards bums, retards and criminals like this. It’s probable that if a poll were taken at an average county jail, it would find a half-dozen males there who had sired more children than all the commenters here combined.

Race plays no part in any of this. Compare any successful, responsible black man with his thuggish, gang-banging counterparts, and the same pattern shows itself. American culture is toxic in this respect: it teaches women that there are no consequences for their choices and to despise all men as inferiors and subhumans. Naturally, they would pursue the types of males who pose no threat to that socially-instilled superiority complex.

The best solution for men is to embargo American women. Don’t have relationships with them. Don’t make children with them. Don’t have sex with them; force them to the margins of society. That’s the only way change can come about.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
ActaNonVerba July 22, 2012 at 21:24

Basically, I think I pretty much exactly agree with the spirit of this article. My thinking is that women today are no different from women at any time. More importantly, PEOPLE today are no different from people at any time. And, therein lies the issue.

99% of people will behave badly when accountability is removed. I do think women, on average, are significantly more prone to selfishness and dishonor than men. But, behaving shamefully when accountability is removed is a HUMAN issue.

So, to get my wordiness over. I basically feel like the root of all the problems MRA’s talk about is the state’s, the culture’s, and individuals’ incompetence in holding female members of the species accountable.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Rocco July 22, 2012 at 21:38

I grew up in a neighborhood that was 70% Jewish and it’s very hard to generalize although this reference states that some things like being intellectual and much more likely (25 x ) to become and attorney are fair generalizations.

http://www.arthurhu.com/index/jewish.htm

I see no place for racial issues one way or the other in the MRM. It serves no purpose to ascribe feminism to the influence of any ethnic group and only inflammes.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4
Darryl X July 23, 2012 at 04:39

@ Eric -

“Worth noting: this afternoon I was in a restaurant and outside the window by the street was one of Seattle’s numerous deadweights holding up a cardboard sign. I saw him go to a new car, talk to somebody through the window, then go back and get his stuff.”

That deadweight could be a child support obligor who for no fault of his own got behind on his payments and because of the Bradley Amendment and because he is ineligible for any public assistance (because of his arrears) now owes so much child support he will spend the rest of his life on the street. There for the grace of God go I, Eric.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel July 23, 2012 at 06:30

Eric
Sure enough, a tall blonde walked up to him a minute later, showed him where she was parked, and the two drove off into the sunset together…

You told the exact same story here several months ago. An attractive woman picking up a street beggar. Now you’ve seen this again? Long story short, I don’t believe you. Didn’t happen.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Peter South July 23, 2012 at 09:03

Uncle Elmer

I’ve been thinking about getting a “snub nose” like Walt carries

I’m a Breaking Bad fan as well, great show.

That’s a Ruger LCR in case anyone is wondering.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Peter South July 23, 2012 at 09:10

Buddy Guy

If white nationalists want us to go against every group that has a high concentration of misandrists, then they should want us to go against white nationalists. Considering, you know, they hate most men and pedestalize white women.

See that’s the problem with generalizations. Not all of us feel that way although I’m sure some do.

There are plenty of White people but there should be fewer Mexicans for instance.

Once things are put back into balance, the rule of law established and a patriarchy in place, white women fall right back into line.

Women respect power, white men gave up their power. That is the problem in a nutshell.

Solution: take back the power. Stand up for yourselves. Does no good to have more kids if they are all simpering cowards no one will respect.

White women are neither good nor bad, brown women are just the same.

Otherwise you have to admit to being a racist and then you’re no better than what you think I am. Get it?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Eric July 23, 2012 at 12:28

Martel:
Unfortunately, I’m describing seperate incidents. I see this kind of thing happening once or twice a month. Also, yesterday’s incident happened on a different street.

If you don’t believe it happens here, ask Price: we live in the same city.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
Eric July 23, 2012 at 12:32

Darryl X:
‘The deadweight could be someone who got behind on his child support payments.’

I don’t doubt that he’s sired a lot of kids, but guys like this are rarely speared for child support. In fact, it’s usually the other way around: these kinds of males have no shortage of women who are supporting them.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
W.F. Price July 23, 2012 at 13:23

If you don’t believe it happens here, ask Price: we live in the same city.

-Eric

Well, it’s different out here. There are plenty of young homeless (male and female) who would be attractive if they had it together, but for the most part they are pretty unkempt.

Actually, if you want to be purely technical, there are street kids who are fairly attractive (physically) and who definitely mingle with beggars. However, you and Charles are likely thinking of an entirely different scenario. I’ve seen plenty of women who would actually be pretty if someone gave them a good scrubbing and taught them to behave, but who are so far gone mentally that they can’t even take advantage of their natural gifts as a female. Incidentally, many women’s charities provide them with the bare necessities in that regard, i.e. soap, makeup, hair care, etc. I support that, because it’s as inhumane to deprive women of their femininity as it is to deprive men of their dignity.

But as for a normal, good-looking woman giving a homeless guy a ride? The only thing I can imagine is that it’s some kind of stakeout, and she’s picking up another undercover cop in an unmarked car. I certainly wouldn’t put it past the cops to do that. In fact, I once saw this guy in a bar acting like a mentally-ill, yet oddly physically fit and healthy older guy, and wondered what was up with him. He even took his shirt off and wandered around the bar like a real nutcase. A month or so later, I saw the exact same guy driving a squad car.

Being “homeless” is a great disguise and a very effective method for spying on people, because we are conditioned to ignore them in the city. But who knows? I didn’t see it myself, so I can’t do anything but speculate.

Eric July 23, 2012 at 14:52

Price:
Could be. Cops have been known to do stranger things. But I also wouldn’t put it past the local women here, knowing them like I do.

Another thing I’ve noticed here is how women look at street bums generally. Several times I’ve seen their eyes light up, they smile and say hi to these guys—invariably giving them money and engaging in friendly chats. Their infamous ‘Seattle Freeze’, though, is reserved for normal guys.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
Darryl X July 23, 2012 at 18:29

@ Peter South -

“Solution: take back the power. Stand up for yourselves. Does no good to have more kids if they are all simpering cowards no one will respect.”

Apparently you do not understand the concept of psychopathy and malignant narcissism. Your “solution” anything but and would only amplify the problem.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
Gottfried Richtoffen July 23, 2012 at 20:44

The pedestalizing of the white woman by white nationalists would be realistic in a heavily tribal society where strong men were in charge of every aspect of their wives and daughter’s lives. Unfortunately, in our western culture, we have a heavily fragmented society where the influence of fathers is almost nil. This pedestalizing of the woman leads to unrealistic goddess worship by the male and gives women and especially attractive women, an unrealistically inflated ego. They really think society owes them simply because of what they are. They need to be taken down a peg or two and ignored by white males who have self-restraint practiced to a point of perfection. These attention starved females will then come running desperately to the men who ignored them. The males should then reject them again and again until these females are back under control. When you really boil it down to the basics. What do females really have to offer except their sexuality and their ability to produce children. They really need us more than we need them.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
ode July 24, 2012 at 04:03

Jews get blamed for a lot of things however there is one thing Jews have NEVER been accused of and that is being stupid or being bad at making money. Seriously, there is no historical record of it. Not even Adolf Hitler, a person who had serious issues, claimed Jews to be intellectually inferior. He did, of course, accused Jews of being morally inferior. He believed Jews to be a parasitic class that thrives by sucking off other people’s productive labor.

hmm funny I think I see a connection here.
Multiculturalism Liberalism views the white man the same way Nazism views Jews. Liberals see the white man as not intellectually inferior but instead morally inferior who achieved his superior wealth by unfair tactics.

The truth is the reason why Jews have more money than White people is the same reason why White people have more money than Blacks and that is intelligence is not equally distributed across the races. I am not a Jew. I am sympathetic to the WN cause but I wish they would drop their anti-Jewish crusade.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 9
Rob Prendergast July 24, 2012 at 06:35

It is easy to make money if you don’t follow the rules of fair play and you put the making of money over all other things in your life. Unfortunately, it seems that many of the top money makers in our society today, don’t follow the rules of ethics and fair play. They rely on manipulation of government and/or the mind of the public to get their money as opposed to the old way of hard work and dedication to produce a product or service that is better. That takes hard work and old fashioned dedication to a higher cause. While these values still exist below the surface in America today, the vulture and parasite seem to get rewarded over and over again and the hard working productive citizen seems to get screwed! Not long before the latter just throws in the towel and either joins the parasitic/vulture class or gives up entirely!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Craig Himself July 24, 2012 at 10:42

@ Buddy Guy:

“The Hassidic Jewish family in Israel has averaged 7 children per family for 3 decades now. As their numbers explode(10% of the population, 20% of 20 years olds, 30% of newborns,) the Israeli economy is bound to completely collapse.”

Wait a minute. I don’t follow.

Will the Israeli economy collapse because Hassidic Jews tend to collect welfare? Is that it?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
"The One" July 24, 2012 at 14:18

dragnet wrote “White nationalists (like traditional conservatives) are really just feminists by another name…”

What? No. White nationalism is not feminism. You’re not white, are you?

dragnet wrote “and most of these AFCs are a blowjob away from supporting VAWA.”

AFCs? I guess you’re one of these guys who thinks he “got game”. You guys are dummies.

dragnet wrote “To the extent that the manosphere is counter-feminist, they have no place here.”

Manosphere? Politically correct people like you have no place saying who has no place.

Suppose I were a white nationalist. What does that really mean? Does it mean I am required to hate non-whites? No. Does it mean I have to believe whites are superior to nonwhites? No. All it means is that you have a favorable opinion towards solidarity among whites.

And you conflate that with feminism? You’re aligned with the feminists for attacking the fundamental right of every racial or ethnic group to be supportive of their own culture and tribe.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
"The One" July 24, 2012 at 14:21

White men ought to stand up for both whites and men. I don’t get why some people suggest it has to be one or the other.

Jews have a complex history. In some ways, the venerable Jewish culture is the foundation of the western Patriarchy, and on other ways, the contemporary Jewish culture is eroding that foundation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Attila July 25, 2012 at 17:07

I enjoy learning from everything – so I got myself a Jewish prayer book (siddur) and read it every night—most interesting document. It may add to one’s understanding of the mindset of “the Tribe”.

I disagree with the comment that Judaism is the foundation of Western patriarchy. The Romans and the Greeks were as patriarchal as anyone else.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
uh July 27, 2012 at 08:18

dragnet,

You’re certainly right that WNs are rabid pedestalizers. And that this is often tied to failure with quality poon.

But do you have to be such a cunt about it? It is possible to both take your own side and criticize something you don’t like about your fellows.

Unless you are non-white / Jewish, of course.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Casu Marzu February 15, 2013 at 19:30

You have to admit, feminism has been relatively benign in the Jewish community other than lowering the birthrate. The vast majority of Jewish parents – even ultra liberal types – raise their children in functional, two-parent homes. I personally think it’s simply that Jewish women are comfortable with the ways of Jewish men, so they don’t elect for single motherhood.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: