NPR: Let’s Subsidize Really Bad Choices

by W.F. Price on July 17, 2012

NPR’s All Things Considered featured a woman who is, apparently, both selfish and stupid, imploring listeners to support her in her conscious choice to have three kids out of wedlock with three different men, two of whom are incarcerated felons.

The woman, Jennifer Stepp, is an unattractive, overweight white female who calls herself a “victim of youthful optimism.” Oh give me a break. She may not be too smart, but she knew what she was doing when she took her pants off for the only local guys who were willing to overlook her obesity. She says she kept thinking “the relationships would last,” but I’d be willing to bet this woman never had an exclusive relationship with any one of the guys she slept with. In other words, she chose to deliberately get pregnant by the most expedient method possible: sleeping with ghetto criminals looking for a quick, easy lay. Maybe she said she was on the pill, too, but we’ll never hear the other side of the story.

A lot of people still somehow believe these women are “victims,” and think they simply were too dumb to make “the right choice.” Bollocks. Just because she’s a white woman doesn’t mean she didn’t see how the game works. You have kids, you qualify for WIC, TANF, Section 8 housing, etc. She was acting in her own interest. She deliberately created a family (sort of), headed solely by her, and is getting “help” from the government in doing so. Essentially, she’s getting paid to have illegitimate children.

Stepp says she makes just under $9 per hour. Yeah, that’s pretty low, but her job is probably very easy, and with all the subsidies, tax refunds and EIC she might as well be making three times that much (e.g. her publicly-funded NGO employer pays half her rent, subsidizes her college tuition and gives her free daycare). After taxes, child support payments and other add-ons, middle-income divorced fathers would be lucky to be doing as well as she is.

Fortunately, the comment section under the article demonstrates that people have caught on, and aren’t buying the pity play any longer.

Here’s the most recent:

Frank Youell (FrankYouell) wrote:
This article is a stunning argument for abolishing the welfare state ASAP. Food stamps, WIC, EBT, Section 8 housing, Medicaid, etc. all should be eliminated immediately.

Without the welfare state this women would have either never chosen to have a child with an obvious loser for a dad, or been forced to give the child up for adoption.

Either way should would have never gone on to produce two more kids with low-life’s.

Like it or not, the welfare state is the oxygen of personal irresponsibility that we as a nation can’t afford.

Twenty years ago, people would have been howling for the heads of the suckers who impregnated this woman (almost certainly unintentionally). Now, they don’t even bother. Things have changed.

{ 81 comments… read them below or add one }

Tom Smith July 17, 2012 at 14:15

What is astonishing is that if this were a man who had done this, the people at NPR would be calling for that man’s head. It bothers me to think that this type of behavior by a woman is supported and endorsed by a public funded entity.

What needs to happen is that women need to be forced to pay for birth control (just like men are). And perhaps women should have to pay the full cost of unwanted pregnancy when she lies about her use of birth control to a man.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 42 Thumb down 1
Justinian July 17, 2012 at 14:19

Under Obama, More Lucrative For Single Mom To Earn $29K Than $69K

A new chart put together by Gary Alexander, Pennsylvania’s Secretary of State, shows that Julia, as a single mom with two kids in daycare, would be better off remaining in her $29,000 per year job than she would be in a $69,000 per year job because of the benefits she would obtain from the government. In the lower paying job, Julia would net $57,327 after she received her government benefits, while in the higher paying job, she would net $57,045.

Since the average Joe earns $40-50K, how can he compete with government given female hypergamy?

Big Brother is the Alpha that so many women choose to marry.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 102 Thumb down 1
MKP July 17, 2012 at 14:21

I agree with your characterization of this woman (and would probably go further in my criticism). But, having heard this conversation for years, and lacking any coherent notion as to what we can do about it, I’ve sort of started to tune it all out.

Does anyone have any realistic ideas as to how to reduce the size and scope of the welfare state? Don’t come back with “vote for so-and-so.” We had a Republican president and simultaneous Republican control of both houses of Congress for 6 straight years in the last decade, and got more of the same – bloated social programs, massive debt, a shrinking pool of suckers to pay for it all.

We’ve all only got one life to live. Stewing in anger at worthless cows like this woman is a waste of precious time and energy. I’ve already done too much of that, I admit with genuine shame. Reduce your tax burden through whatever means possible; diversify any resources you possess (foreign currencies, precious metals, and anything else that can be hidden and not taxed); and stay the hell away from where this woman’s sons are going to be when they reach age 15. Other than that, just live your live the way you want to, as best you can.

And for young men who are tempted by White Nationalism, be aware that this woman is exactly who you’ll be enlisting to “protect.” This fat, snaggle-toothed welfare mom is the jewel of the white race that the panty-sniffing losers of the White Nationalist movement want you to lay down your life to protect. Again – just stay away from it all. Don’t get angry (it does no good), don’t get even (because we’ve conceptualized no realistic way in which that will occur), just figure out what’s best for you and direct your time and energy towards that.

Sorry Price. I guess I’m in a bad mood.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 108 Thumb down 8
HeligKo July 17, 2012 at 14:24

The base argument that the mother can’t suffer the consequences, because the children will suffer the consequences is the core of all these things. The men can suffer, because it helps the kids. The society can suffer (higher taxes) because the it helps the kids. The mother can’t because she is the path to the kids. This is utter crap. The kids always suffer at the hands of their adults. That is a fact of growing up. A stupid mom or dad that do poorly at raising the kids in any matter is a story that never goes away. We aren’t doing kids any favors for all this effort on their part.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 1
Craig Himself July 17, 2012 at 14:28

“The game done changed” –Notorious B.I.G.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 4
freebird July 17, 2012 at 14:33

Easiest job in the world,and guaranteed to pay.
Mandatory sterilization and abortion for kids out of wedlock.
Fault divorce restored.
Presumption of father custody
No alimony under any circumstance.
No more Medicade/WIC/section 8/grants,ect.
Dismantle the 8 Presidential Councils for women.
I sum, remove all incentives to divorce and have children out of wedlock.
Stop paying for artificial insemination for old spinsters and lesbians.(Including huge payments for eggs,and small payments for sperm)
There’s been over 100,000 public funded insemination/”baby sales” given (by tax)
to lesbian and old spinsters.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 9
Anon July 17, 2012 at 14:36

I’ve decided that Uncle Sam is the biggest polygamist in world history. And he’s using our money to support all those wives!

Please make it stop.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 73 Thumb down 1
Poiuyt July 17, 2012 at 14:52

http://standyourground.com/forums/index.php?topic=23013.0

“”This afternoon, President Obama’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released an official policy directive undermining the welfare reform law of 1996. The new policy guts the federal work requirements that have been the foundation of that law — one of the most successful domestic policy reforms in the 20th century.””

COMMENT:
Truth is, it’s not a woman problem in the strict sense, but our problem as ever agreeable, good natured and dependable males. Stooges in short.

In these lands at least, we’ve all grown into pussy begging cowards. This is to say that, we are now the worlds best examples of first rate manginas and white knighting chumps.

Someone said its now a woman’s paradise. Meaning in truth, that it is actually a prostitutes paradise of illegitimate children and delinquent bastards, bred off estranged and isolated fathers bilked of resources.

Now whom’s gonna stop the pot-bellied negro welfare queens gravy, or dare to tell the slutty-eyed white divorcee that her white style greed has to end ? Before the indebted and broken society is run aground …

Not me. That for sure. I’m a go find a quiet corner for myself … wait it out for as long as it takes to implode.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 42 Thumb down 1
Napoleon July 17, 2012 at 14:53

This was on NPR last week. At the end the host asks the woman he was interviewing if these women should not be having kids if they cannot support them and she basically said that it is their decision and society must support them anyway.
These single mom victioms that NPR and the mainstream media like to promote are starting to not look like victims at all but rather leaches and irresponsible bums.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 63 Thumb down 2
Craig Himself July 17, 2012 at 14:55

If we look at this in terms of net present value then it gets even worse, because then we’re accounting for…
o schooling
o arresting, trying and jailing her sons
o more illegitimate children that her daughters will have

Sheesh.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 2
The First Joe July 17, 2012 at 14:56

Welmer – it’s “bollocks*” not bullocks.

Ironically, bullocks are bulls that no longer have their bollocks.

(Bollocks* in UK english = balls = cajones = testicles)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 1
Anon July 17, 2012 at 14:56

As fat as I can tell, the place where she works is itself funded by charities like United Way and probably receives government grants. That should be added onto her welfare total, even though she reports to a school for “work” to get it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 1
Russ July 17, 2012 at 15:03

The welfare state is the totalitarian cuckolding of the taxpaying American man.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 58 Thumb down 4
Georice81 July 17, 2012 at 15:13

She is getting a degree in Early Childhood Education. I am not sure that she is the kind of person society should allow to be teaching children no matter what age.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 62 Thumb down 0
some dude July 17, 2012 at 15:15

Somebody in the thread about Obama asked me why I don’t vote against stuff. This story is a great example why.

Are the Dems gonna drop this hosebeast? Are the Repubs gonna kick this skank to the curb? No? Then what the hell am I voting against? We all know both sides are going to prop up this welfare whore. And they’re gonna make us pay for it. And they’re gonna castigate every swinging dick for treating this walking womb so badly.

Do any of you really think we’re going to vote this trash away?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 60 Thumb down 1
keyster July 17, 2012 at 15:18

Last week Obama quietly and unilaterally removed the federal “work requirements” provision instituted by Clinton.

http://blog.heritage.org/2012/07/12/obama-guts-welfare-reform/

Much like applying Title IX guidelines to academia is a little “gift” to feminists, removing the work requirements from welfare is a little “shout out” to all the bruthas and sistas.

Am I the only one that sees what a disaster this man is?
You can’t keep up with his pandering ploys to special interests, (disguised as “social justice” policy), inbetween campaign stops.

Oh and almost half of NPR’s funding comes from Tax Payers.
Yepper, we pay for that adorable little Liberal Propaganda entity, whether we want to or not. “All Things…” are rarely, if ever “Considered”…if they don’t meet with the biased purview of management.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 8
keyster July 17, 2012 at 15:44

FYI – Obama’s mother was a welfare/free edumucation whench makin’ multi-culti babies for fun and profit too.

Google Images “Obamas mother nude pictures”.
Communist and Obama mentor Frank Marshall Davis took those pictures. “Uncle Frank” was boinkin’ Mom!
Yeah, Obama’s Mama liked her some black snake moan.
Oh and Obama’s sister? Her father is some Indonesian native.
Ms. Dunham was known to enjoy her sexual liberation, while Barry was off smokin’ the best reefer on the island.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 8
ode July 17, 2012 at 15:56

Am I the only one that sees what a disaster this man is?

In the good old days America was a nation where: 15% of society is poor 70% is middle class 15% is doing well.

The new distribution will be: 50% of society is poor 35% is middle class 15% is doing well.

Basically the middle class is being hollowed out.
My goal is to make sure I don’t end up being part of the 50% however Obama and his policies is not making it easy. Staying single is a big part of my financial strategy.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 0
Lara July 17, 2012 at 16:19

Looks like the comment you quoted was removed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 13
Days of Broken Arrows July 17, 2012 at 16:49

The NPR article seems to be calling out for more “social programs” to help women such as this.

My question is why does no one ever bring up the fact that the program that is actually needed is one to teach women to breed with decent men, not spawn with bad boys who fly the coop.

Say what you want about this woman’s looks, but there are a lot of lonely Omega guys out there who might have happily started a family with her when they were both young. Instead, she chose something else. If we’re going to have programs, then someone somewhere needs to be paid to tell her there’s an alternative.

I remember seeing a lot of this at my old office, where the female clerks would blow off the male employees and instead be visited by various “gangstas” during the day, one of whom apparently provoked a fight right in the front lobby.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 1
anonymous July 17, 2012 at 16:53

@First Joe

Welmer – it’s “bollocks*” not bullocks.

“That’s Bolshevik!” — Madagascar 3.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Attila July 17, 2012 at 17:47

The reptile brain is strong on most women – much stronger than the frontal lobes – interconnected as they may be in females. Hence their fluid, protean way of getting their way.

Underhandedness is their modus operandi.

That’s how they get naive and gullible men into their trap.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 2
Attila July 17, 2012 at 17:49

They’re basically a life support system for endless verbalizing and networking.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 2
The Whammer July 17, 2012 at 18:08

@Justinian- that’s what I was saying a few weeks age. None of these females are really living on these low paying jobs(usually part time too) and the benefits that they receive have a monetary value. Who needs actual money when everything is paid for?

And even that example that you gave doesn’t tell the entire story because the benefits are really worth a lot more than working for $70k. Sure, she’ll lose her benefits and have to pay tax etc.and it appears to come out about the same but you’re not taking into account a few things. When you’re working there’s an expense just getting to work, buying lunch, and buying things like clothes that an unemploed female collecting benefits doesn’t have to do. You’re also expected to be at work every day. Many of these females on benefits also pick up cash off the books that no one sees.
So the benefits in your example are really much higher when compared to the $70k job.

Imentioned that many men in dire straits can receive benefits too but the problem is that men for some reason won’t apply for them or are not as persistant as a female and just give up and suffer.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
Eric July 17, 2012 at 18:08

Keyster:
Clinton’s mom was also a ‘heroic single mother’. Notice the similarity in the shrewish, manipulative wives he and Obama married, who ended up as the powers behind the throne.

What’s funny, too, was that the media manginas used to say the same thing about Reagan—whose mother was a widow who washed floors to support her family. They were always claiming that Reagan’s wife was a scheming dominatrix of some kind. From what I remember her ‘policy decisions’ were mostly about interior decorating and meal preparation.

Those types of ‘strong women’ though, aren’t politically correct.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
universe July 17, 2012 at 18:16

<…

but we’ll never hear the other side of the story.

– Such as it is with Some Things Considered.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
pb July 17, 2012 at 18:18

Hayek fans might be interested in taking this apart: http://c4ss.org/content/11091.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
The Whammer July 17, 2012 at 18:27

@ Eric, yes Reagan’s mother was a widow. His father was probably an alcoholic but from what I know he was with the family and worked although they moved around a lot.
Reagan himself worked as a teenager and earned money. He was a lifeguard.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 2
Attila July 17, 2012 at 18:34

NPR – one bastion where non-homo, non-Jewish, non-gay, non-black, non-female need not apply.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 5
Charles Martel July 17, 2012 at 18:44

Here’s a picture/a> of two of her three kids. The father of the oldest child, not pictured, is doing 30 years for armed robbery. Any questions?

It’s so friggin’ painful to watch Thomas Jefferson’s country die. It really hurts. I hope I live long enough to see the day when the check’s stop coming.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 4
Turbo the drycleaner July 17, 2012 at 18:45

Some days i feel like i should buy a bunker and stock it with years and years worth of food and just live in solitude as i wait out the kali yuga.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 1
Glenn July 17, 2012 at 18:50

I got into the foreign women scene back in the early 1990s’, and the internet MRM since the early 2000′s. As the author points out, if any man took issue with the behavior of any woman 10 or 20 years ago, a platoon of White Knights would swarm in for the attack.

Since the economy took a nose dive, you rarely see men defending women on YouTube, or any other comment-enabled webpages. In fact, most of the more pointed comments are openly adverse to feminist ideology and feminists in general.

Times are truly a’ changin’.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 0
Lyn87 July 17, 2012 at 18:59

To add insult to injury: this woman has the right to vote.

Just. Like. Us.

If something cannot continue forever, it must stop.” – Economist Herbert Stein

This state of affairs cannot continue forever. These parasites are killing the host.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 2
ActaNonVerba July 17, 2012 at 19:04

Women and their love for entitlements is like one big trough that men are expected (through labor, sacrifice, etc..) to keep filled. And, women are constantly falling all over each other trying to get their fat snouts in there.

Women today are no different from pre-feminism days (accounting for the small minority of them that have always been decent human beings). Times change, technology changes, and their tactics change. But, they’re still the same. They try to get away with as much as they think they can and their greed and selfishness are never sated.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer July 17, 2012 at 19:18

The “widening gap-single moms” meme is getting a bit of press lately.

Why just yesterday in Forbes, in a standard fempress ploy known as “Whitewashing” wherein stock photos of white people are used to front essays about black perps :

The Rise and Downfall Of The American Single Mother

http://www.forbes.com/sites/brycecovert/2012/07/16/the-rise-and-downfall-of-single-mothers

elmer chimes in :

It should be difficult for women to raise children on their own to discourage young females from birthing children before they are capable of providing for them.

It is time this society stops incentivizing and lionizing single motherhood at the expense of people who delay gratification, work hard for the future, and make responsible choices about having children.

Also you are not quite honest with your essay, as you posted a stock photo of “mother and white baby” when Ms. Schairer’s children are the offspring of an absent black father, an all-too-common situation that demands society pick up the tab for.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 0
mrcs84usn July 17, 2012 at 19:25

Stuff like this will probably never change because these women get to hide behind [very] thin veil of the “best interest of the child.”

The “best interest of the child” would be when both parents want to have kids WITH EACH OTHER during a time in both of their lives when they’re mentally, emotionally, physically, and FINANCIALLY prepared to have children. But obviously, when it comes to raising another human being, the planning and preparing portion is still foreign to millions.

I’m not particularly a fan of abortion, but I am even less of a fan of “oops I’m pregnant, well I’m going to keep it.” I could only imagine how many of the worlds problems would be solved if the only single mothers that were on welfare were there because the husband was the husband was dead (freak accident/military service/whathaveyou) or they were at least together for the child’s primary development stage.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
TFH July 17, 2012 at 19:42

Another anecdotal metric of how things have changed, take a look at the poll I put up a few days ago (I have to post this to make the point I am making, so apologies in advance) :

http://www.singularity2050.com/2012/06/a-first-quarter-poll-on-the-misandry-bubble.html

While there is obviously some selection bias, a lot of feminists also went out of their way to post the poll at DailyKos, etc. where, to their dismay, about 40% of voters still said misandry is a problem.

So, the results are a huge landslide in our favor. Even if we assume most of the ‘Yes’ votes are selection bias, the results are still a pleasant surprise. You could remove 90% of the favorable votes, and still have more voters who think feminism has gone too far, vs. those who think women are oppressed.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 7
TFH July 17, 2012 at 19:43

Uncle Elmer is awesome.

He singlehandedly tied up that entire ForbesWoman e-zine..

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 15 Thumb down 11
continent July 17, 2012 at 19:49

Wellmer, First Joe and Anonymous
I was baffled by your linguistic battle, so I checked the Internet.

Urban Dictionary: bullockswww.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bullocksCached – Similar
You +1′d this publicly. Undo
A term Americans mistakenly use when they really mean to say bollocks

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
jaego July 17, 2012 at 19:53

This is exactly what White Nationalism intends to put an end to. Women like this race mixer will be put out and/or not be let in or back in. Jefferson is rolling in his grave. Our whole society is an experiment not in eugenics but dysgenics. And as far as Eugenics go: no race could benefit from it more than the White. We have alot of brilliance but also alot of lower types who should be expunged. I guess Nature is doing that for us via race mixing. There is no dark cloud without a silver lining.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 25
Eric July 17, 2012 at 20:00

Jaego:
If she’s any specimen of the ‘white goddess’ you’re all hoping for—the WNs have got a bigger task than you’ve imagined.

Maybe it’s time more men engaged in ‘race mixing’.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 16
Rocco July 17, 2012 at 20:10

I don’t worry too much about the gov whores, I worry about the other whores, the ones who fool men into marriage, get pregnant and use the guy until they’re done then it’s dump daddy time.

As a post above indicates, the single parent rate for whites is headed to 80% similar to the black community.

Men who marry and impregnate these parasites are truley fools.

If you a family, expat or use a surrogate and don’t ever marry or support a single mom. For every one like this there are three children abused by negligence and three fathers who cannot see they’re kids.

I wonder how many men were stealing to pay outrageous child support payments?

It’s not fashioable today to think of how it is our prison’s became the new slave block, but here it is.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
Rocco July 17, 2012 at 20:14

BTW

Great job Elmer, the ladies of Forbes hamsters are spinning at light speed!

They should pay you.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer July 17, 2012 at 20:16

Uncle Elmer is awesome.

He singlehandedly tied up that entire ForbesWoman e-zine..

————————-

It’s Fifty Shades of Elmer, and the bitches love it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 0
The Whammer July 17, 2012 at 20:27

They try to get away with as much as they think they can and their greed and selfishness are never sated.

Is that greed or just a part of a female’s Nature and reproductive and survival instincts? You could say that men’s desire to accumulate a lot more wealth than they’ll ever need as their reproductive instinct since wealth gives them access to the best pussy which is the youngest, best looking and most fertile.
Females are always going to have a certain nature because they are the sex that becomes pregnant and subconsciously sense that they may have to support and care for others aside from themselves.
The problem with this female and others like her is that they’re living in an artificial world where they are guarenteed survival on the charity of others without having to make any real sacrifices when they make a bad decision, like getting knocked up 3 times without having a means of support or being required to be faithful to a man. Men obviously noticed what a female’s (and male’s) nature was like and invented this thing called marriage in one form or another and while it’s not really ideal it may have been the lessor of two evils and preferable to gangs of females and their feral kids causing problems in the society. It doesn’t matter what religion you follow because they all were invented to handle the same problem originally that being what to do with the females and their kids and how to control the female’s promiscuous animal breeding patterns. The only way to somewhat control the female is through conditioning from an early age and fear and they did this with religion and by inventing an all seeing God who would punish for any transgressions against the rules. Every religion began the same way, the control over procreation because it is the most important thing in life. Females who violated whatever rules existed in their society were shamed and their kids were mamzers(bastards) and in some cases were outcasts where they’d have to survive on prostitution or just perish. Society is really upside down now where the females who follow the old animalistic rules of promiscuous reproduction and are supported in it by the State are accepted and the ones who follow the more advanced new rules that men developed are criticised for not being “liberated”. What you’re seeing today even if it’s worldwide will not go on because by the next generation when people really see the outcome they’ll be forced to change again. When people realise the amount of resources amd other human productivity losses that have happened they’ll revert to a more traditional system and start cutting benefits to punish females who have kids they can’t support on their own and you’re going to see a lot more shaming as was done in the past to deter females from this. There’s plenty of birth control around and if a female doesn’t use it then she wants to get pregnant. The female in the article did it 3 times! If she had to suffer a bit the first time she’d think more about what she was doing. But who knows. The lower classes are stupid which is why they are at the bottom and in her silly mind I guess she thought she’d get the 2nd thug to take care of her and when that didn’t work out she tried a 3rd thug. They should do a follow up story five years from today because I’m sure there’s a 4th thug waiting in the wings lol
One poster commented on the additional costs ,aside from the benefits, that females like this waste but I can tell you that 1 female like this can cause a lot of damage and it’s well into the millions if you really take the time to figure it out. It will reach a breaking point and then you’ll see the change and I hope I live long enough to see it :)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 5
dhanu July 17, 2012 at 20:31

OT: OT: Woman indicted on 53 counts of rape; gets 3 years, and 8 years probation. Jerry Sandusky had 48. Please tell me there isn’t a sentencing disparity: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/wpdlm/woman_indicted_on_53_counts_of_rape_gets_3_years/

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Rocco July 17, 2012 at 20:37

And you would never have seen this in the NYT:

“A long series of cultural, economic and social trends have merged to create this sad state of affairs. Traditional social norms were abandoned, meaning more children are born out of wedlock. Their single parents simply have less time and resources to prepare them for a more competitive world. …

Liberals are going to have to be willing to champion norms that say marriage should come before childrearing and be morally tough about it.”

From 7/9 NYT David Brooks

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/10/opinion/brooks-the-opportunity-gap.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
B July 17, 2012 at 20:52

This guy would agree with this article, but would be alienated by the White Nationalist BS; too bad, because he is on the right track: http://youtu.be/dcKuhivmHCw

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4
MKP July 17, 2012 at 21:27

This is exactly what White Nationalism intends to put an end to. Women like this race mixer will be put out and/or not be let in or back in

Yeah. Here’s the problem: 90% of the women in this country consider this woman to be a hero of the modern age, and are fully on-board with taxing productive men to pay for her decisions.

Seriously, that’s not an exaggeration. 90 percent. Even the white women who vote Republican and come from two-parent Christian households think single mothers are heroes and “victims of the system.”

How are you going to build a successful all-white society when there are practically no white women who are willing to condemn this woman’s behavior? I can never get a straight answer to this. It’s always “stop the race-mixin’ … the Jews run Hollywood … umm … look over there! A black guy committing a robbery!”

White women have absolutely no interest in hearing any criticism of this woman’s actions, much less putting a stop to them. None. Anyone with any experience with women knows this to be true. Do you have any answer to this point?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 3
Jim July 17, 2012 at 21:53

dhanu

Nice link!

And you do not here about a case like that on TV 24-7 for months or years on end like Sandusky.

Rape is a serious crime….but not if a woman commits it.

If I had a tv network I would make stories like this a big priority to expose.

And I also did not hear that she will have to register as a sex offender. Remember there are thousands of guys on the sex offender registry for peeing in public and mooning and telling a 17 year old that she is hot or grabbing a girl’s ass at the bar.

But a woman can rape multiple people and guess what…she does not have to register.

If all guys out there knew the crimes that women get away with in this country they would no longer have any faith in the media or in the “justice” system. And letting them know the truth is the only way that things will get fixed.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 1
MRA July 17, 2012 at 22:06

@keyster July 17, 2012 at 15:44
FYI – Obama’s mother was a welfare/free edumucation whench makin’ multi-culti babies for fun and profit too.

Google Images “Obamas mother nude pictures”.
Communist and Obama mentor Frank Marshall Davis took those pictures. “Uncle Frank” was boinkin’ Mom!
Yeah, Obama’s Mama liked her some black snake moan.
Oh and Obama’s sister? Her father is some Indonesian native.
Ms. Dunham was known to enjoy her sexual liberation, while Barry was off smokin’ the best reefer on the island.

You may also like
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMUlWbO1rhk&feature=player_embedded

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Paul Murray July 17, 2012 at 22:29

@Justinian “Big Brother is the Alpha that so many women choose to marry.”

No – big Brother is the beta provider. They still fuck Alphas.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
piercedhead July 17, 2012 at 23:55

It’s hard to believe anyone here still has any faith in partisan politics anymore – however bad the current guy is, he is standing on the shoulders of the pygmies who ‘led’ before him. Obama is only responsible for what he has added, not for what his predecessors did before him.

And I’m not American. I have no skin in this game. From the little I can see, your election is identical to the clown-show I have to put up with. The only difference is the names.

Men will never get a deal out of politicians, no matter what they say. They are all flatterers of women. It’s what works. Get used to it.

Politicians and women are on the same side. Women are society, politicians are vying to be their spokesmen. They do not care about you. They will have you executed for crimes you did not commit. They will have you murdered in the millions on foreign battle fronts. They will steal your property and give it to women. They will make insane judgments on your ability to provide and lock you up in a jail if you fail.

They will separate you from your children who love you, and use them as hostages to destroy both you and them, because that is what your woman wants.

Women (society) believe we men are redundant. They believe if we all dropped dead and died, they would be better off. Politicians are just carrying out their wishes as orders.

There will be no change until women start hurting – until they start realizing that men’s welfare is their welfare. Even then, it will be women who make the overtures, and women who will try to set the terms. The politicians will simply deliver women’s message, as they always do.

We are wasting our time putting any faith in politicians, or in believing there is any way we can formulate policy and make it happen.

All we can do is flee the reservation and do the best we can on our own. Eventually women will start making offers. Maybe they’ll even try and entice us back with really great deals like they’ll assume our family name, and maybe name their kids after us. If you think that’s a good deal, go for it.

Personally, I would hold it for something a bit more substantial.

In the meantime, it’s actually kinda neat out here in the great outdoors answering to no-one but myself, looking after myself in every way that matters, dealing with no women at all, listening to no double-talking political woman’s rep, and laughing every day at the latest inanity coming from their camp (did you hear the one about women now having higher IQs?). If they want me back, the deal would have to be staggeringly sweet. So sweet I can’t even imagine it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 1
Gamerp4 July 18, 2012 at 00:02

Payback is a BITCH, right on and yep END OF AMERICA is near THANKS TO CUNTS and OBAMA’S JACKASSES LAWS.

In this country and in this time who ever plays the victim card gets the support, who ever goes and cries like a bitch, weep at their situation gets a pat on the back, ALL THOSE RESPONSIBILITY TALK AND OBLIGATION GOES DOWN ON 1 FUCKING SHOULDER “MEN”, I am not playing the victim card here but dude, This much pandering and ass kissing of these obese single mom needs to stop or else its the dark abyss for us, WE NEED CIVIL RIOT RIGHT ON TO STOP THESE BITCHES.

They are like termites eating the dead carcass of American economy, and men are the one that are suffering with this much going on and obama dreaming about his mistress JULIA I would say we will not see 2020 with a smile on our face but rather a holding a salvar while begging CHINA or RUSSIA for some cash.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Robert in Arabia July 18, 2012 at 00:54

http://biglieonparade.blogspot.com/2012/07/ironic-twist-in-murderrape-of-swedish.html

Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Ironic Twist in Murder/Rape of Swedish Girl
This is an older story that completely slipped under my radar. Granted, my blog was not up at the time of this crime. But I don’t even recall ever hearing about it! But it is an important story and a cautionary tale. Thus I am posting it today. A little over a year ago a music video called “Mix it Up” (which I did hear about and watch.) was shot in Sweden. The whole premise of the video was that whites should sleep with non – whites. It was pure Miscegenation propaganda. The video itself is a topic worthy of an entire post. One of the “Stars”of the video was a pretty little blond Swedish girl named Elin Krantz. At one point in the video, Krantz can be seen writhing on top of a black male in mock sex while singing what I believe to be the Swedish National Anthem. You can see it in the video beginning around the 1:02 mark.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=bHOEZo7VfN8

In a twist of sickening fate Elin Krantz was brutally raped, murdered and her body discarded like garbage by a black male who was riding the same train as her. I have seen the crime scene photos and they are sickening. I take zero pleasure in the fact that this poor girl departed this earth in one of the most horrible ways imaginable. But the irony here is not lost on me. If anything, Elin Krantz should be the poster child for the evil human sacrifice cult that is liberalism. A cult that is especially successful at brainwashing and sacrificing young white women to its God of Non – Discrimination.

Posted by Cicero at 12:24 PM

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
freebird July 18, 2012 at 01:38

“I mentioned that many men in dire straits can receive benefits too but the problem is that men for some reason won’t apply for them or are not as persistant as a female and just give up and suffer.”

“The base argument that the mother can’t suffer the consequences, because the children will suffer the consequences is the core of all these things. The men can suffer, because it helps the kids.”

That is why men do NOT get benefits.
They are not holding children hostage.
Men are to PAY,not collect.

That’s why these women choose to breed and live alone,having a male in the household reduces/eliminates benefits.
It’s really quite simple and self evident.
A lot like the Haiti relief,females get fed,whilst men get held back by troops holding rifles.
I do not understand your motivation
in asserting false suppositions.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 3
Annonnymous July 18, 2012 at 01:39

White woman’s rape, rapine and plundering is only made respectable by the white mans calling it alimony…

… But its impact and consequences are just as bad as black dick going where it shouldn’t have dared

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 6
Eric July 18, 2012 at 01:46

MKP:
To add one aspect to your question: assuming they had unlimited access to white women, what do they hope to gain? They seem to working on some kind of premise that if the Anglosphere was ‘purified’ then things would work out on their own. I’m not quite so optimistic.

However much they may hate people of other races, they keep forgetting that feminist women hate men even more.

I think there’s a lot of the same element in their thinking that drives people like Mark Driscoll: that’s really the bad men who are producing the bad women. They’ve just narrowed down the pool of men to hold responsible for it, by blaming it on their various scapegoats. They can’t get around pedestalizing the ‘white goddess’ no matter how hard they try.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 6
Binxton July 18, 2012 at 01:55

The quality of our white women in America is poor.

White American females are unable to recapture their earlier femininity by themselves. We as men must re-instill femininity in our women. This task requires educating our women to be submissive and obedient to men, and to punish and discipline those women who insult or otherwise dis-respect men.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 3
Eric July 18, 2012 at 01:59

Piercedhead:
That’s all very true. In western culture, the State has always been seen as a ‘paternal’ institution. Naturally, women, who ‘don’t need a man’ turn to a strong male in its abstract form—the State. Similarly, because they no longer desire fulfilment with a powerful man, they seek power in its abstract form—again the State serves as a substitute.

Under such a system, nobody but mangina-men can really rise to power, unless you count some bull-dyke like Margaret Thatcher who could pass as a man.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Eric July 18, 2012 at 02:06

Robert in Arabia:
‘The cult of sacrificing young white women…’

Yeah, I notice nobody was forcing the White Goddess in question to be publically filmed getting on with a black man, now did they? And just what was her relationship to thug who ended up killing her?

You and Mark Driscoll are cut from the same cloth. I’m sure if there were no blacks in Sweden, Ms. Princess never would have been a slut, right? LOL

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 13
Ray July 18, 2012 at 02:49

Wait until she accuses one of those convicts of domestic violence. That ought to be good for a few more taxpayer dollars whether the convict actually did something, or not.

Someone questioned this woman’s I.Q., but she appears smart enough to game the system for dollars. :-/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
S-Cargo July 18, 2012 at 02:56

Our culture has evolution running in reverse. For millions of years the smarter, stronger, and more resourceful you were, the more offspring you had. Now it’s the dumb, weak, and lazy who are reproducing the most. Evolution is in reverse (devolution?) and it will end badly.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
Lara July 18, 2012 at 04:54

MKP,
I doubt many women consider this woman a hero. Other women won’t condemn her as strongly as you’d like, because they know in comparison to her they look good.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 10
Art Vandelay July 18, 2012 at 07:07

So halfway through that article I thought to myself “I bet at least one of those kids is half-black”. Guess I’m a racist in addition to a misogynist.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Georice81 July 18, 2012 at 07:35

Art Vandelay July 18, 2012 wrote
“So halfway through that article I thought to myself “I bet at least one of those kids is half-black”. Guess I’m a racist in addition to a misogynist.”

Based on the children’s names I would say that they all probably are. The problem is not that the fathers are black. The problem is that they are all ghetto thugs.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2
Keyster July 18, 2012 at 09:09

This is exactly what White Nationalism intends to put an end to. Women like this race mixer will be put out and/or not be let in or back in. Jefferson is rolling in his grave.

Yeah so, Jefferson is probably not the best example to choose as someone rolling in their grave. George Wallace, Jesse Helms, Strom Thurmond or Robert Bryd…maybe…but Jefferson liked to crack the black oak too often and has the lineage to support it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 5
MRA July 18, 2012 at 09:24

Then these same kind of women are the one talking how independent and empowerment they are, and how they don’t need a man and nobody to help and rise their kids.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
"The One" July 18, 2012 at 10:00

The Swedish woman who was murdered by the black American man is not the same woman as the one in the video. Nevertheless, the one in the video is a revolting Feminist and no white man should accept her after she’s made that video.

You never see white men and black women nowadays. It’s always the opposite arrangement. This is thanks to decades of anti-white male racial and feminist propaganda.

You don’t have to be a white supremacist to see that there is a mainstream anti-white movement and the Feminists are all race traitors. This is why I like Golden Dawn. At least they have balls.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Rusty Shackelford July 18, 2012 at 11:56

So…am I the only one that had a pretty good idea of what her kids were going to look like before seeing the picture that somebody linked above? I guess I’m just rayciss’.

I’ll give her this much – at least she’s trying to turn things around. But it would have been better had she not opened her legs for every swinging buck that turned her on.

The problem with trying to have a rational argument about eliminating or reducing social safety nets is that the statists will always trot out a “but”..”but what about x person who had y happen to them? Clearly you hate pregnant underaged illegal immigrant Costa Ricans who were brought here by their parents “.

And no politician in either party is ever going to propose serious curtailment of these benefits. The Dems and the Repubs are two sides of the same coin. The Repubs want capitalism and will tolerate a welfare state if it otherwise doesn’t interfere with their platform. The Dems hate capitalism but want the money it generates to fund the welfare state that creates the voters needed to keep them in power. To me it’s like this – Imagine you and your friend both want coffee, but you only have enough money between the two of you to get one cup, so you have to share. You take yours with two cream one sugar, he takes his with two sugar one cream. You both want coffee, you’re just fighting over the proportions.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
Eric July 18, 2012 at 13:31

The One;
Some of the most racist white women I know of only date black men. And they don’t typically choose successful, handsome, respectable black guys, either.

It’s the same thug-chasing dynamic, with a racist element thrown into the mix.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3
Jay July 18, 2012 at 13:44

I’m a proud democrat. . .and I’ve defended npr from some real bizarre and illiterate attacks. . .

. .. however. ..

This one is spot-on.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2
Ex-Army July 18, 2012 at 14:38

Excellent points. I riff on the same subject and link to this post here:
http://ex-army.blogspot.com/2012/07/miscegenation-nation.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Captain No Marriage July 18, 2012 at 15:51

Hopefully I won’t be around when the govt’s ponzi scheme comes crashing down.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Mikey Mikey July 19, 2012 at 11:56

So let me get this deal straight, I work like a dog till retirement, remain childless because the mating pool is warped, just to pay for women to pump out babies for thugs, who I’ll be more than a dad to than the actual father! Then these same women can boast and gloat about claiming, whichin my opinion is akin to boasting about not being able to READ, let alone the fact that it says you can’t rear your own kid.
Sounds like a great deal, so glad I don’t confuse the issue by getting a bloody choice in this.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
JJ Johnson July 19, 2012 at 15:55

The Stupid far outbreed the inteligent. And the inteligent get stuck with the stupids bills as well as there own. Steralization for the wealfare vampires that are breeding us into oblivion.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Richard July 19, 2012 at 17:17

OK, first it was the knob-gobbling femislut. Now it’s the welfare manatee.

Please, can you post pictures of something a little less disturbing, like, say a mexican drug-gang execution video?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
bruno July 20, 2012 at 02:42

Give to men equal reproduction rights:
- a child can be born only when the father gives explicit permission, otherwise it must be aborted.
- the cost of raising the child will be paid by the person who it lives with.
- if both parents want the child, it will live with each of them 50%
- if nobody wants it, it can be adopted.

Equal rights!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
fubsy July 21, 2012 at 10:36

“Twenty years ago, people would have been howling for the heads of the suckers who impregnated this woman”

1992??? Seriously? Try 50 years ago. You must be very young, Mr. Price!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
W.F. Price July 21, 2012 at 11:02

“Twenty years ago, people would have been howling for the heads of the suckers who impregnated this woman”

1992??? Seriously? Try 50 years ago. You must be very young, Mr. Price!

-fubsy

Welfare reform was in 1994 — guess who got stuck with the bill…

Francis July 24, 2012 at 02:01

Groce. seriously. I don’t know why were paying for that.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: