As Military Sexually Integrated, “Sexual Misconduct” Epidemic Results

by W.F. Price on June 27, 2012

A number of Air Force instructors are facing rape, harassment and/or inappropriate contact accusations, and there is a supposed epidemic of “sexual misconduct” involving female recruits. The reporting on the matter tends to conflate sexual assault (so far only one instructor accused of rape) with inappropriate consensual sex.

At this point it remains to be seen whether the man accused of rape will be convicted, but given the politics involved I wouldn’t bet on a fair court martial. As for the others, they stand accused of various minor offenses such as adultery and making unwanted advances.

I’ve written before how introducing sex into male institutions has a corrupting effect, but politically correct ideology refuses to recognize that young women tend to be sexually attracted to higher-status males. Putting a relatively young man in charge of a lot of young, fertile females is bound to lead to some sex, no matter how many threats and disincentives the man is exposed to. Sex is such a strong biological compulsion that it simply will happen — especially amongst the types who tend to join the military. This has been recognized for all of history, and soldiers were typically excused for using prostitutes or having sex with local women so long as they kept it off base.

But now we’re actually bringing the women into the bases and expecting them not to have sex with the men surrounding them. Generally, it is sterile, older feminists who are demanding that the men keep their pants on, all the while excusing the females, who even in the current case admittedly engaged in a great deal of consensual sex with military men.

So far, none of the women who had sex with the non-raping instructors have been charged with anything, although they clearly should if we are to hold them to equal standards. It may be true that instructors have more responsibility, but female recruits are adults – not children – and therefore fully capable of making sexual decisions.

However, when it really comes down to it, we ought to ask ourselves whether it’s appropriate and worth the trouble to create such a risky situation in the first place. The military is not, and never has been, an equal-opportunity employer. Nor should it be. It is an institution that has a very clear purpose – to fight and win wars – and we pay for it. It’s relatively harmless to fiddle with gender ratios at the DMV, the USPS, and even the Forest Service, but the military is not a fundamentally benign institution. It is a necessary evil, and should only be maintained at the level necessary to ensure national security. Introducing affirmative action bloat to it is not only wasteful, but a danger to national security. President Obama should be ashamed of himself for squandering our money to unnecessarily expand an institution that should be lean, mean and efficient, and for giving it a job – enforcing gender equality – it has no business doing.

{ 83 comments… read them below or add one }

keyster June 27, 2012 at 12:20

Introducing affirmative action bloat to it is not only wasteful, but a danger to national security.

It’s not a political issue as much as it is with military leadership at the highest levels in the Pentagon. Many of the Generals are Leftist and fathers of daughters. Wesley Clark was a big Hillary supporter, but he’s just an outward example…he’s also typical of Pentagon Brass. Our military leadership is very “progressive”. They are Vietnam war/sexual revolution era men. They’re Feminist indocrinated. They don’t care what men think. Deal with the wymyns. That’s an order!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 0
American June 27, 2012 at 12:20

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 29
American June 27, 2012 at 12:25

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 27
Eric June 27, 2012 at 12:26

Feminisation of the military began under Clinton, was accelerated under Bush Junior, and is being completed under Obama. It’s not surprising this kind of thing is the outcome: the military is going the way of government, media, academia, and Corporate America.

The problem is that too many refuse to see that Socon sexual puritanism and radical feminism are not mutually exclusive; they are mutually dependent. Socon feminists like Bush held the same attitudes: that ‘professionals’ somehow are supposed to ‘rise above the lower instincts of sex’. Like all Socon thinking, it’s only a polite way of expressing a feminist maxim that men’s sexual drives are evil and somehow need to be curbed.

Feminism gained its foothold in the Anglosphere precisely because this puritanical cultural dynamic that regards women as sexually pure, and sex as a necessary evil forced on them by men, was already well-instilled in the public mind.

From these ubiquitous ‘harassment’ cases—most of which turn out to be false accusations—it can be seen that feminism never had anything to do with female ‘sexual liberation’; but was all about male sexual repression. It’s not surprising that guys like Futrelle, Fleming, Scalzi and others of their type—deeply sexually repressed males—are the loudest and most active of manginas. This is also why so many mangina politicians are constantly getting trapped in the most ridiculous sex ‘scandals’. It’s the cultural sexual repression looking for a vent.

Manginas too are overwhelmed with false guilt over their sexual feelings, and that leads to stupid and suicidal policies like including women in the military. They have appease women continually to salve their own consciences, even though their masochistic impulses have considerable damage on everyone around them.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 50 Thumb down 6
maxsnafu June 27, 2012 at 12:31

“At this point it remains to be seen whether the man accused of rape will be convicted, but given the politics involved I wouldn’t bet on a fair court martial.”

That depends on whether or not the accused is Black. Race trumps gender.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 3
maxsnafu June 27, 2012 at 12:42

@keyster:
Wesley Clark is indeed a Leftist but most high ranking military men are not. It’s worse than that; they’re careerists. They will knowingly support a destructive policy if they think it will advance their careers. Leftists think they’re doing the right thing but careerists know they’re not.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 1
"The One" June 27, 2012 at 12:53

American, you talk a lot about the “white Gender-Raunch community”. What does “Gender-Raunch” actually mean? Heterosexual fornication? Fags and Dykes? Transexuals? What is exactly is “Gender-Raunch” and why do you associate it with whites?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 2
Mikediver June 27, 2012 at 12:56

The first women that are going to be serving on submarines were wined and dined at the White House recently. I served in submarines in the 70′s and 80′s. At the end of the 70′s beginning of the 80′s (Carter) there was a push to integrate women into all areas of the military. The admiral in charge of US Naval Submarine force said it would happen over his dead body and built enough push back to stop it in it’s tracks. I think Reagan taking over helped stop the foolishness. Privacy is impossible on a submarine. How they think this will ever work is beyond me. If they were serious about women being capable then they would create sex segregated crews for submarines.

One day, at about that time, I was chatting with a very attractive female navy doctor on the pier beside my moored sub, and a group of new recruits marched by going to the sub tender at the end of the pier, where the doc worked. The comment of this sweet and cultured female was, “Sh*t; more women. If they aren’t getting STDs they are getting pregnant.” This was the observation of a woman dealing with the issues at the ground level.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 1
Rebel June 27, 2012 at 12:59

I heard that women will also become submariners. Now think about promiscuity…

Maybe the solution is to hire gay males only within the military.
Wouldn’t that solve the “problem”?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2
Huck Finn June 27, 2012 at 13:04

I think it was during the Reagan years that I read a statement by one of the senior French officers commanding the French Foreign Legion. He said that the reason the Legion works so well is that there are not any women in it. He was referring to both the front line and support troops of the Legion.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 0
DCM June 27, 2012 at 13:07

How many men will want to marry a female in her late 30s who spent years on a submarine crew?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 61 Thumb down 1
Troll King June 27, 2012 at 13:18

OT.

Here we have a NY slut who compares her situation to homeless hobos.

http://www.nerve.com/love-sex/7-love-secrets-from-a-fancy-hobo

Also, Nora Ephron is dead

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/06/27/goodbye-nora/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Troll King June 27, 2012 at 13:20

OT.

Feminists are talking about the Male Pill

http://feministing.com/2012/06/27/the-wednesday-weigh-in-male-birth-control-edition/#comments

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
Opus June 27, 2012 at 13:21

Opus First Law, (I can’t remember the second) posits:

If you place a man and a woman together in close confines over a prolonged period then sooner or later they will have sex.

The corollary to the First Law had better be :

Women when placed in a confined area with a man will always conclude that they are being sexually propositioned. [Remember Skepchick in the Lift - for thirty seconds!]

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 0
Opus June 27, 2012 at 13:22

Lift = Elevator

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Huck Finn June 27, 2012 at 13:34

I just clicked over to Feministing. There was a story there (didn’t read it) that headlined women are 60% of the time the primary breadwinner. OK, so tell me how that meshes with the feminist mantra ‘women are only paid .70 cents to the dollar that men are paid’?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 0
ralph gorman June 27, 2012 at 13:39

Excellent article. I will be a little more pointed. How can women defend their country against mass raping enemy soldiers when they cannot defend their cunt against their own troops? Armies do two things: They kill men and rape women. Whether it is Genghiz Khan and the Mongols, the Roman legions, the Japanese and their pleasure women or the mass raping Red Army, that’s war.

Women have no business at all in the military. However, the best way to destroy feminism forever would be to make war an exclusively female obligation. After getting slaughtered and maimed by the hundreds of thousands, they would be only too happy to give up the right to vote, hold public office and compete with men in the labor market. Their whole movement would be dead – literally.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 4
Young Guy June 27, 2012 at 13:50

Women in the military are a bad idea for the following reason (reasons I can think of off the top of my head):

1. Soldiers in combat are sometimes forced to go weeks, sometimes months, without be able to take a shower. The male body can withstand this abuse, but not the female body. When things get really tough, soldiers sometimes have to take showers with bottle water, with almost no privacy. Soldiers have to ration their laundry carefully, so if you have five uniforms in your duffel bag or rucksack, you might have to wear the same uniform for over a week. Changing socks and other under garments need to be done daily. You don’t need to be in a swamp to get trench-foot. If you are out on a mission that last a few days, and you don’t have the opportunity to change your socks, then expect your feet to be covered in sores and moldy skin.

2. Sticking females with males at an outpost in the middle of nowhere is going to lead to sex, pregnancies, and false rape allegations. A lot of female soldiers get pregnant to avoid deployments or to go home early. They will even make false rape allegations, claim they are psychologically traumatized, and be sent home that way. It is even common for lower pay-grade female soldiers to sleep with higher pay-grade male soldiers because they want to get promoted or receive special treatment.

3. Women are nowhere near as effective in combat as men. This includes body strength, endurance, mental toughness, and aggression. If I am in combat, I want to be side-by-side with a bunch of tough sons-of-bitches, and not be side-by-side with Barbie. Women’s self-preservation instincts are strong, so good luck having to rely on her to put her life in danger to save someone else. Also, you will have to worry about chivalry. The brotherhood is what makes a platoon of men so effective. You have a bunch of guys whose main focus is not letting their brothers-in-arms down, and will to give their lives to save the lives of a one another. Stick a woman into the equation, and now you will have to deal with a damsel in distress who will get in the way.

4. The military requires women to have separate living quarters and shower facilities than men. It would be way too much hassle for a platoon outside the wire to always make special arrangements for female soldiers. Also, you will have to deal with women who will try and turn the men against each other. Men in battle need to see each other as brothers, and not as guys who are competing for the attention of a female. There is no place for sexual manipulation in combat.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 79 Thumb down 1
Towgunner June 27, 2012 at 13:52

Simply, women don’t belong in the military. It’s always about conforming the military to meet women needs or to meet their inferiority.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 50 Thumb down 1
TFH June 27, 2012 at 14:09

The Brian Banks documentary has met and exceeded its funding goals. It was $9000 short the first time I posted it here, but is now funded. Great work to all who donated :

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1681576010/the-brian-banks-story?ref=home_popular

They are still accepting further donations, and 30 hours are still to go. Those who can, please contribute, as this will deal a major blow to the False Rape industry.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 3
greyghost June 27, 2012 at 14:30

Welmer
Good, that is what the military gets for playing PC games in the first place.

I wonder how they plan on getting the straight males to kill americans that decide enough is enough. I bet you in a few years if the economy picks up or a male pill comes available that they start drafting men. We will have a sitiation where 10 to 20 year in service PC feminized bitches will be senior to a bunch of 1 to 2 year draftees. Love to ride in an aircraft that bunch worked on.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 1
Soapwort McFuggletoes June 27, 2012 at 14:35

When women become talented at front line warfare, such in our feminist fantasy propagandist media of late, there will arise a nation which conquers the world with an exclusively female troupe. Good luck with that.

Until that day….

Re-spawning in kitchen in 5….4….3….2….

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
Ode June 27, 2012 at 14:51

Sometimes I wonder, if in the future we had to engage with an andversay equal to 50% of our economic power, basically a credible threat, would we continue this foolishness or would we as a society come to our senses, push the women aside where they belong so men can step forward and do the serious work?

Why do I get this weird feeling I’m actually going to live to see the day when this question gets answered.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 0
TLM June 27, 2012 at 15:00

My experience is dated, late 80′s & Gulf War 1, but make no mistake about it, chicks in the military are nothing but trouble. They are relentlessly pursued by an Army, pun intended, of beta-bitch males that will put any civilian white knights to shame with their sickening pandering to these skanks. And they are all ugly skanks. I can’t remember a single one at Ft. Bragg that was better than a 5. These AF guys in the post were some what smart to go after them in basic training because it doesn’t take long for them to realize they can manipulate a system that will bend to their will in becoming “victims” of abuse. I can only imagine how much worse the witch hunts have become since my time in. And the one thing I learned about the sexual market place while enlisted, was that black guys will truly f*ck just about anything.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 3
Quartermain June 27, 2012 at 15:02

Under the Carter administration, in boot camp there would 3 male platoons and 1 female platoons in a company.

Problem?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Turbo the Drycleaner June 27, 2012 at 15:04

someone above asked about the wage gap myth and how its still surviving when we are admitting woman are primary breadwinners more often than not.

the simple reason is that idiots still believe it.

i challenged a feminist teacher once to prove the wage gap, saying it was ridiculous to assume that the business world would willingly sacrifice billions of dollars to employ men when they could employ only women instead.

in front of the class, she basically disproved the wage gap by admitting that any pay disparity was due to womens choices in the work place.

it didnt matter because she tacked on at the end that it was still unfair for men to be paid more. and the class was nodding in assent at this.

American children no longer have two brain cells to rub together so as long as you yell loud enough and long enough theyll believe anything you say.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 0
"The One" June 27, 2012 at 15:13

Yeah… It’s never going to work. However, there will be plenty more women as “diversity tokens”, and even a few more decorated, valorious female soldiers. Those who are honorable and praiseworthy must be honored and praised.

Overall though, they’re just a drag on military readiness and resources. In general, they should meet bureaucratic stone-walling to keep them out.

The biggest problem is the false allegations of sexual impropriety. It’s especially risky because the federal government is in the thrall of the radical feminists.

President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden have their fingers in their ears and they’re saying “lalalalalalalala – we can’t hear you – lalalalalalala”…

They’re hoping that we’re somehow going to be vanquished by their legions of “wymyn” Feminists and emasculated male Feminists. The only reason they would maintain such irrational perspective is because they are dyed-in-the-wool Feminists themselves. Poor pathetic slobs.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
Soapwort McFuggletoes June 27, 2012 at 15:16

Remember too that women will readily use PC inspired policies with intentionally loose definitions to socially manipulate others. The standard used is essentially one of proving innocence of the charged party followed by careful non-reciprocity geared tip-toeing around the accuser.

Harassment may include charges of ‘unwanted’ attention. No more, no less be required. Do something perceived as ‘unwanted’, even so much as being friendly/considerate one two many times, and you may just be the new ‘stalker’ nominee to be excoriated before the HR judge and jury. Ask me how I know. Sexual context need not be involved at any level. Unethical use of this tool barely makes a blip on such persons radar.

Even if a charge is ultimately found to be without merit, your reward shall be that the sword of Damocles be decidedly positioned into the hand of the accusatory party, ready for another swing should you be anything less than dutifully controlled by the situation now sponsored by the institution and originated by the accuser. Just forget the idea of equitable outcomes.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
keyster June 27, 2012 at 15:20

@keyster:
Wesley Clark is indeed a Leftist but most high ranking military men are not. It’s worse than that; they’re careerists. They will knowingly support a destructive policy if they think it will advance their careers. Leftists think they’re doing the right thing but careerists know they’re not.

I have it on good authority that Pentagon Brass are typically Democrat/Liberal. I know this is surprising, but its true. The Rightist types are out-numbered so they don’t say anything. Those that do are smacked down into submission. (Recall the dust up over the General in Iraq that didn’t want women because they were all getting pregnant. And he had to “walk it back” a couple of days later.)

This policy may have “come under” certian presidents, but even Clinton didn’t push women in the military, although his wife did somewhat. She wanted them in combat roles early on and almost the entire Congress (bi-partisan) rebuffed her, and she dropped it. Clinton’s “policy achievement” regarding military personal was “Don’t ask, don’t tell”. He was pandering to Gays, not women.

Again, its not driven by presidential policy. The origin is Feminist Pentagon Brass. Trust me.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 2
Justinian June 27, 2012 at 15:38

We will have a sitiation where 10 to 20 year in service PC feminized bitches will be senior to a bunch of 1 to 2 year draftees.

I think this is the biggest danger of all. Something like this will start a male flight from the military the same way where 60% of college students are female.

When that happens a downward spiraling effect will occur, women will get most of the desirable and/or powerful positions. While the ever shrinking number of males are restricted to the nastiest and most dangerous jobs.

Alot of the cannon fodder use to tolerate their positions as long as they had the possibility of moving up the chain if they stuck it out. Will the cannon fodder want to remain if they have no hope of being anything other than cannon fodder while the females get the fast track to the top?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 0
Anonymous June 27, 2012 at 15:40

Solution to all this brouhaha is to have all-female battalions. Have sex-separated camps. And yes. Bring the women to the combat. After all, how much effort is needed to pull the trigger? But the battalions should be sex-separated.

With all-female battalions, all of the harassment problems will disappear. Right?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 4
Brigadon June 27, 2012 at 15:40

I am looking forward tro the keystone cops unfolding.

at least our military won’t be able to be used against americans… hell, it won’t be a threat to anyone.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
Skeptic June 27, 2012 at 15:49

I keep thinking as modern digital warfare become less and less about trenches and bullets, and more and more about satellites, drones and robotics, then women will gravitate towards it as it becomes a safer work environment. It’s a wonder we didn’t see Chief mangina Obama in an operations room directing a drone hit on someplace in Pakistan with some affirmative action womyn whoreficers at his side manipulating pastel pink computer consoles on TV and Youtube already.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer June 27, 2012 at 16:03

This is nothing.

Wait until the military gets saturated with homos and dykes. Will give new meaning to “the buddy plan”, “eating cheese”, and “brown-nosing”.

Then there’s those gals demanding to breast-feed while in combat.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
keyster June 27, 2012 at 16:13

There are no female drone pilots at this time in the US military.
Below is a promotional video from Ratheon, (they make the booths) and the female is a Raytheon employee. It’s assumed she’s military.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llWGXEmyMR4&feature=player_embedded

They are known as “unmanned aircraft”.
Mark my words they will be known as “unpersoned” eventually.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
will June 27, 2012 at 16:34

Meanwhile the shaming of men continues this time in games:

http://www.dailylife.com.au/news-and-views/dl-opinion/sexually-assaulting-lara-croft-20120626-2100r.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
gunner451 June 27, 2012 at 16:34

Military policy is now so anti-male sexuality that it is unbelievable. You will be court-martialed or at the least given an article 15 for visiting a prostitute off base and any business were “working girls” might be found is strictly off limits now (like barber shops in Korea where they offer a “happy ending” with your shave and hair cut).

If you’re deployed that basically means that there are no outlets for your sexual desires/urges other than fellow female military personnel. That leads to quite a few problems and most over seas bases have become quite the hot bed of sexual intrigue, manipulation and general slutting/whoring it up. Hopefully we’ll never have to fight a real war because I have serious concerns about our ability given the current policies in the military.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 0
will June 27, 2012 at 16:39

When men flee the military, here comes the draft.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 0
greyghost June 27, 2012 at 17:02

gunner451
We were in Korea in 88′ and deployed from there to PI and to Thialand. I didn’t go to the PI but did do Thialand. Back then there were not very many military women but they were ignored I mean walked past like they were invisable. Women hated it is my guess.
BTW we were at a Korean AFB living in tents at the end of the runway and the american engineers had built a little whore town outside of the base. The town had a few resturants and simple stores and a few night clubs or bars the hookers worked at. The corpmen would check them out and they wore little numbers so you could tell which one you got VD from. I was real young and inexperienced at the time though I wasn’t a cherry boy but close enough. That six months was the most fun I ever had in my life. And Thialand let me tell you, a street hooker in Thialand is 50 times the lady any christian american woman is that even claims to love you. I will take that to my grave knowing that is the truth. It took my years later thinking back and actually getting that experience that taught me that lesson.
Times have changed gunner451

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
alpha June 27, 2012 at 17:35

[[Sometimes I wonder, if in the future we had to engage with an andversay equal to 50% of our economic power, basically a credible threat, would we continue this foolishness or would we as a society come to our senses, push the women aside where they belong so men can step forward and do the serious work?

Why do I get this weird feeling I’m actually going to live to see the day when this question gets answered.]]

Something to do with Russia and China

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Troll King June 27, 2012 at 18:16

Feminists are now blaming men for the fact that they have less time in the day. They kick men out of mens roles and take on mens roles while guarding the domestic role and they have the nerve to bitch and moan about men not doing their share? I guess in the future they won’t be able to, cause there simply won’t be very many men or fathers around or in families.

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/06/27/having-it-all-not-a-womens-issue/#comments

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
Gilgamesh June 27, 2012 at 18:32

Best part, none of today’s generals have served a day in combat. It’s actually harder to get your stars if you serve in combat. It’s been this way since at least vietnam.

http://www.johntreed.com/tournament.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
The Whammer June 27, 2012 at 18:59

I’ll Break The Baby’s Face

http://tinyurl.com/7b7ao9q

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Rebel June 27, 2012 at 19:02

keyster June 27, 2012 at 16:13

They are known as “unmanned aircraft”.
Mark my words they will be known as “unpersoned” eventually.”

I would tend to have an opposite opinion: “unmanned! sounds good for those who are emasculating the male representative of the human species.
Think of how the “unmanned” man sounds exciting to feminists.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
The Whammer June 27, 2012 at 19:08

http://tinyurl.com/7jsobw5

I’ve noticed that the News has been doing a lot of these anti feminist, anti female bad behaviour stories the past few weeks.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Eric June 27, 2012 at 19:10

Rebel/Keyster:
I think I read somewhere once (correct me if I’m wrong) that most of these unmanned drones are operated by women. Not surprisingly, they usually hit civilian instead of military targets.

I’ve always imagined that Hillary invites her feminist friends over for movie night; and they sit around eating popcorn and watching videos of drones blowing up Arab chieftains.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3
Charles Martel June 27, 2012 at 19:16

Gilgamesh
Best part, none of today’s generals have served a day in combat. It’s actually harder to get your stars if you serve in combat. It’s been this way since at least vietnam.

I can believe it. Same is true in business. My boss at a Fortune 5 company once accused me of “going native” when I tried to explain to him how difficult it was going to be to do what he wanted. The more you know, the less qualified you are for the corner office, where the primary qualification, as keyster has explained, is looking like a CEO.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Born Free June 27, 2012 at 19:17

It’s time for a letter writing campaign to Obama. Let’s make the military 100% female and see how well protected we feel. If women are the exact equals of men, then we would experience no diference, would we?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel June 27, 2012 at 19:19

Eric
Rebel/Keyster:
I think I read somewhere once (correct me if I’m wrong) that most of these unmanned drones are operated by women. Not surprisingly, they usually hit civilian instead of military targets.

Launching weapons from UAVs is terrorism no matter how you slice it. This country has far bigger problems that feminism, unfortunately.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 6
The Whammer June 27, 2012 at 19:21

http://tinyurl.com/6w9eyxw

It seems that the News is not only taking stories fron NY but from around the US and even the world. And females are not looking good. So much for the kinder gentler sex :)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Paradoxotaur June 27, 2012 at 20:03

@The Whammer: “I’ll Break The Baby’s Face”

Well, I just hope the Family Justice System has enough sense to not allow the father custody, or even visitation (oops, my bad! It’s now called “parenting time”, but it’s not custody and won’t insulate a father from having his children taken out of the country by the mother)!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
dannyfrom504 June 27, 2012 at 20:31

i’ve been in for 18 years. when i went to boot camp it was segregated and a well oiled machine. right before i graduated, they started integrating female drill instructors. the first thing said DI’s did was play the sex card.

one DI told a recruit, ” WHY ARE YOU EYBALLING ME. YOU WANNA FUCK ME?” when the recruit said no the DI responded with, “WHY, YOU THINK I’M UGLY??!!”

i can always tell when a ships about to get underway becuse the clinics get a run of girls coming in to get pregnancy tests to get out of deploying.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 1
GS Jockey June 27, 2012 at 21:08

@ Gilgamesh: “Best part, none of today’s generals have served a day in combat. It’s actually harder to get your stars if you serve in combat. It’s been this way since at least vietnam.”

Huh? Dude, you are just flat wrong. I know several general officers personally (maybe 9-10 of them.) Of that number, all but two have significant combat experience.

GS Jockey

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Brian June 27, 2012 at 21:21

This video tells a tale of a female line handler: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIDJMRPMxJo

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
ralph gorman June 27, 2012 at 22:04

This subject needs a little humor. Corporal Cushy Tushy is complaining that Seargeant O.J. pinched her tit. The CO tells her to challenge O.J. to a knife fight (hand-to-hand combat is part of the job). Corporal Cushy Tushy lies dead with her throat cut thirty seconds later.

Military violence has just solved “domestic violence”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Gilgamesh June 27, 2012 at 22:09

@GS Jockey
I dunno what to tell you, the guy who wrote the article looks pretty legit

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 22:25

there’s a comment at troll kings link that everyone should read

“While MRA’s make a much bigger deal out of this issue than it needs to be, I have known men who have been the victims of intentional “oops” pregnancies. This was in relationships where the established and communicated intention was that things would be casual / short-term and / or that the guy had been quite clear that he wasn’t ready for children. It’s a despicable, if not entirely incomprehensible, move on the part of some women who are truly desperate to secure traditional access to power at all costs.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 22:41

Huck Finn June 27, 2012 at 13:34
I just clicked over to Feministing. There was a story there (didn’t read it) that headlined women are 60% of the time the primary breadwinner. OK, so tell me how that meshes with the feminist mantra ‘women are only paid .70 cents to the dollar that men are paid’?

————————————
it’s ‘wimminz are breadwinner uno’ when the issue is about feminist inferiority complex

it’s ‘wimminz paid less’ when the issue is whining for more free stuff

the left is full of stuff like that

according to leftists a spate of astronomical bad luck allowed a class of bumbling idiots (white males) to dominate their physical, intellectual, and moral superiors for centuries (e.g. random lightning bolts knocking off female poisoners, earthquakes and other natural disasters swallowing up legions of black slave armies, etc.) because in reality these groups are just sooooo superior as evidenced in hollywood)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 22:43

btw it’s femiFISTing not feministing
please remember

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 22:47

the best way to destroy feminism forever would be to make war an exclusively female obligation. After getting slaughtered and maimed by the hundreds of thousands, they would be only too happy to give up the right to vote, hold public office and compete with men in the labor market. Their whole movement would be dead – literally.
————–

would never happen
their intention is to let men do the dying for them and then step out of the foxhole when it’s safe and take credit

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Paul Murray June 27, 2012 at 22:54

@Young Guy: “Women’s self-preservation instincts are strong,”

I believe the word you are looking for is “natural cowards”.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 22:57

i challenged a feminist teacher once to prove the wage gap, saying it was ridiculous to assume that the business world would willingly sacrifice billions of dollars to employ men when they could employ only women instead.

in front of the class, she basically disproved the wage gap by admitting that any pay disparity was due to womens choices in the work place.

it didnt matter because she tacked on at the end that it was still unfair for men to be paid more. and the class was nodding in assent at this.
——————————
that’s because they’re a bunch of females and manginas

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Eric June 27, 2012 at 22:58

EvilWhiteMaleEmpire:
Like I’ve always said, it’s the knights who fight the dragons while the damsels are doing the jesters in the knight’s beds. I think we should conscript all the bums, criminals and thugs the grrrlz like so much and use them for cannon fodder.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 23:15

Solution to all this brouhaha is to have all-female battalions. Have sex-separated camps. And yes. Bring the women to the combat. After all, how much effort is needed to pull the trigger? But the battalions should be sex-separated.

With all-female battalions, all of the harassment problems will disappear. Right?

————————-
they won’t do this because, unless steps were carefully taken to shield them from the most ferocious fighting their ineptness would become too obvious
they want integration so that men can pull half their weight for them ‘behind the scenes’
so they can say that they were in the trenches with the men

it’s instructive to contrast fem policy regarding soldering to that of sports
here it’s exactly the opposite
in spite of having no opposition feminists make NO effort to integrate sports
why? because doing so would make their inferiority glarringly obvious

but in wartime there are no folks up in the bleachers seeing the squad held back by the female

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 23:16

I think we should conscript all the bums, criminals and thugs the grrrlz like so much and use them for cannon fodder.
—————
not a bad idea. i like it

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
ActaNonVerba June 27, 2012 at 23:27

10 yrs USMC vet. The comment about women and “high status” males is all one needs to know about women in the military. It’s a disaster for good order and discipline. Among the enlisted (which is what I was), they make a beeline straight for the senior NCO’s. Their goal is to use their sensuality, victim playing, and, if need be, sexuality to get themselves in good with senior NCO’s so they don’t have to follow the same chain of command and rules that male servicemen do.

These senior NCO’s (most of the time) fall for it because their white knights or because they look on them like daughter figures or because they get excited by the attention from younger women. All it takes is letting your guard down once. If the senior NCO let’s himself get into just one compromising position the female then has him by the metaphorical short hairs (i.e. can ruin his career).

On top of this, senior NCO’s are scared about false allegations or if they don’t “play nice’ the female will just go around or above them and use a higher ranking man, equal opportunity office, or some other means to get their way.

I say give women their own military. Give them equal everything….funding, equipment, etc.. But, above all, give them equality in missions (i.e. miserable conditions, combat). It breaks my heart to see this happening to the military with its history of honor , sacrifice, and bravery. So sad.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 27, 2012 at 23:34

Skeptic June 27, 2012 at 15:49
I keep thinking as modern digital warfare become less and less about trenches and bullets, and more and more about satellites, drones and robotics, then women will gravitate towards it as it becomes a safer work environment.
————————-

yes, there will be plenty of gung ho females now that killing is becoming increasingly risk free

in fact part of the reason you have a push for females in front line combat roles is because foot soldiers themselves are slowly getting phased out by robots, etc.

they can say ‘look what brave soldiers women proved themselves to be’ JUST BEFORE the soldier is permanently laid off anyway

convenient

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Troll King June 27, 2012 at 23:38

“We will have a sitiation where 10 to 20 year in service PC feminized bitches will be senior to a bunch of 1 to 2 year draftees. ”

——————————————————————————————

We are already there. When you look at enlistments women make up a small percentage, something like 12% or 14% but if you look at officers they make up slightly more (around 15-19%) and around 30% of senior civilian military personnel.

I remember reading that about 24% of new officers and those projected to rise to be senior level officers were women. So in just a few years time women may be becoming officers at 2x the rate they exist in the military overall. It is already happening in the Air Force, which is where I got the ~19% number from.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
ralph gorman June 28, 2012 at 00:12

Evil White Male Empire is asserting that women want to play five cunt hole general while men do the dying. He is quite right.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
American June 28, 2012 at 04:57

The history books will show how American Gender-Raunch became the loudest mouths in the US military. They Inflamed their way to empowerment with false rape, and false harassment statistics. For those in the military that have to deal with loud mouth arrogant lesbians that are abusing their power over you, realize that they got their positions of Empowerment through perverse, and unconstitutional means.
The misinformation and manufactured statistics Alliance between the Gender-raunch community and American law enforcement that has provided the “Inflamatory rhetoric” for Gender-raunch to Inflame the masses with, is not only perverse, its unconstitutional.
American law enforcement stepped into a pile of perverse dogshit when they started this misinformation Alliance, and all of America now has to deal with loud mouth Gender-raunch in places of authority that they are not qualified to be in.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 7
Darryl X June 28, 2012 at 05:15

@ Mikediver -

“If they were serious about women being capable then they would create sex segregated crews for submarines.”

OMG can you imagine a submarine with an all-female crew. They would be their own worst enemy.

I am familiar with women in the military. One gal is retiring after twenty years. She had three children while she was in the military. The way I look at it, she basically spent two years for each child not contributing anything to service while she was in. That’s six years of her military career basically being paid for having babies. And she gets to retire. I don’t think our military can endure that kind of work ethic and misppropriation of funds.

I’m also familiar with other women who have “served” in the military and in their minds they have actually done everything a man has done. My understanding is that at least until now no woman has ever served in actual combat. They have only been in “support” positions. The entire concept of a women in combat makes me shudder. And when women equate their non-combat experience with a man’s combat experience, it makes me sick.

For frame of reference, I was offered a direct commission as a LCDR. I declined because I was going to have to spend more than five months per year away from my family and I didn’t think that would be good for my kids. But I understand the process of recruitment and I have worked with the DOD on projects. I cannot see a woman operating in any capacity with which I have cooperated. I certainly don’t see their integration as possible.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
keyster June 28, 2012 at 07:06

I think I read somewhere once (correct me if I’m wrong) that most of these unmanned drones are operated by women.

That’s in Israel, (where conscription is mandatory regardless of gender). There was a female drone pilot in the US, and they’re probably training a few tokens right now. They’re usually pulled from the pilot ranks, and they want to keep women pilots more visible to the public, not hidden in building in Arizona.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Firepower June 28, 2012 at 07:17

Eric

Feminisation of the military began under Clinton, was accelerated under Bush Junior, and is being completed under Obama.

WOW!
I never knew that stuff!
Now THAT is some 37-upvote-worthy analysis
that was sorely needed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 11
Firepower June 28, 2012 at 07:25

This is what happens.
Some fresh, additional outrage gets tossed on the pile,
Price does his duty and reports on it.
Then, it all deteriorates into “this sucks!” and “women suck!”

But, often there’s a gem buried in all the wine:

Eric
I think we should conscript all the bums, criminals and thugs the grrrlz like so much and use them for cannon fodder.

So true, little trooper. I think we should have no-fault divorce. We should have free healthcare, too! Big Macs should cost a dollar. In a few years, we should get these realistic programs passed into law.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 15
AndrewV June 28, 2012 at 08:57

@Opus June 27, 2012 at 13:21

If you place a man and a woman together in close confines over a prolonged period then sooner or later they will have sex.

According to my Sicilian ex brother-in-law they have a simpler saying:

“If you put two dogs together, they are going to fuck”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
AndrewV June 28, 2012 at 09:06

OT:

Pushback on the Obama 1 is 2 Many video continues:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XXox6ma1gtE

1,264 likes, 451 dislikes

Looks like a lot of people are not buying the VAWA bullshit.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Towgunner June 28, 2012 at 10:50

Rebel is right; there is probably a short half-life for referring to drones as “unmanned”. However, the automation of the military is yet another example of the true reality of the situation i.e. “robots on top”…and, importantly, not women. The military is being robotized at a very fast rate. The F22 and JSF are very likely the last generation of manned fighters/attack aircraft. This trend has been going on since the 70′s and 80′s, now the proof of concept is here and the technology is proven, moreover the technology is far beyond what the first dreamers could have imagined. The machines have long since exceeded the physical limitations of humans…in fact with drone technology established, the insistence to include people is the only thing holding the machines back, and this includes our enemies. An SS-20 SAM, travels at mach 8 and can literally turn on a dime, put a human in something like that and they’re dead in an instant. For all the “ceilings” and “barriers” broken female pilots are in the same boat as the males…their jobs will likely be going away…sooner than you think. As for boats, the same things are happening there too, plus armor (tanks). Now, despite our culture manager’s obvious attempt to change nature, reality and eons of male dominated fighters…here too we are approaching an entirely new paradigm. “They” have mosquito sized and shaped drones. I’m not saying there will be Terminator-like endoskeletons running around, frankly, that design is too inefficient for our technology (God is the only one to get that right), nevertheless why train and pay a human grunt when you can swarm the Iranian Republican Guard with poison tipped mosquitoes? Think it can’t happen…we’re already here. It seems farfetched but we’re truly closer than ever to a predominantly robot army, navy and air force…to my fellow Devil Dogs, I can’t see how we’d survive in this new age, sorry. However, on the flipside, this new military will not be some shining example of “gender” and “homosexual” inclusion. The human component will be relegated to that of a curator and minimized. When you look at it like this, you realize how silly, naive and ignorant women appear…it’s not women “on top”, or “go girl”…no it go robot and robot on top. So, the future of the robot military will still be male dominated, thanks to all the video games we play, our over developed hand-eye coordination out-competes the females.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Eric June 28, 2012 at 11:15

Flower-Power says:
‘whoa, dude, is that shit really going on in the army? makes me glad i failed my drug test…’

Some guys here are younger and don’t remember the Clinton Administration policies very well.

‘wow…wasn’t he the dude who legalized pot?’

No, though he was accused of smoking it in the White House once. But he said he never inhaled.

‘huh..huh…i always inhale. whats the point of getting stoned without inhaling? no wonder he fucked up the army…’

Yes, by integrating women into positions they shouldn’t be in…

‘duh, wait, though, didnt you just say losers like me should get drafted or sumthin?’

Yes. They used to do that it in European armies. They were put in units called the ‘Expendables’ and sent to do hazardous duties no one wanted to waste a valuable soldier on.

‘shit man hope they dont pull that here. maybe puttin’ the bitches on the front lines aint such a bad idea’

Spoken like a true dysfunctional loser.

‘gee thanks man. my girlfriend likes it too. shes a supermodel you know…huh huh cuz im an alpha.’

I don’t doubt that one bit! LOL

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3
Doug1111 June 28, 2012 at 11:36

Great post.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Firepower June 28, 2012 at 12:38

Eric June 28, 2012 at 11:15

Flower-Power says:
‘whoa, dude, is that shit really going on in the army? makes me glad i failed my drug test…’

Your wise, trenchant use of logical facts WILL make you a Great Leader to lead the mrmtroops to
Online
Victory

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 10
tiredofitall June 28, 2012 at 16:22

@ Aamerican

Jesus Christ man, you sound like the last five minutes of “Being John Malkovich”, except for a stream of non-stop Malkoviches it’s Gender-raunch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6Fuxkinhug

Gender-raunch Gender-raunch Gender-raunch? Gender-raunch.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Fubsy June 28, 2012 at 17:50

I know what ‘gender’ means, but I think ‘raunch’ comes between brunch and lunch…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
American June 30, 2012 at 07:19

Fubsy.
Gender, comes from what new American feminists call themselves “gender-feminists”.
“Raunch” comes from what Ariel levy describes in her book about female chauvinism, and the rise of the “Feminist Raunch culture”.
You put these two terms together, and you get a term that characterizes new American feminism to a T.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: