Embrace your Inner Narcissist

by Featured Guest on May 29, 2012

By Ethical

Women love a man who takes control. Then there’s the relentlessly considerate man who sees no need to control her at all. Every woman deeply appreciates how rare and special of a find this enlightened new age is, a who man places such a high importance on pleasing her that he makes sure never to impose himself by assuming he understands her needs without first asking what she actually wants. Every woman hears how this male sensitivity is highly treasured by other women, which is why she’ll be so conflicted when she realizes she absolutely detests a man for exactly the same quality. Because it doesn’t take long before every one of those questions he asks her becomes in her mind an excruciating reminder that he doesn’t already know the answer. After that his constant questioning, seeming more and more like seeking her approval, begins to grate on her skin until she’s surprised to discover she feels utter contempt for him and she begins to wonder if the reason is exactly because he’s so considerate. Rather than fill her with warmth his attentive questions at best fill her with indifference. She finds herself losing her train of thought while answering, occasionally catching herself disturbed by day dreams of being taken roughly from behind by his asshat friend.

Women will openly admit they don’t always want to be asked what they’d like before a man acts because it quickly gets old and makes a man appear to be a child seeking permission. But at the same time women get very angry or hurt when they feel men haven’t asked about and listened to their needs. No wonder women are accused of wanting men to read their minds. It’s the only reasonable conclusion to arrive at about someone who by their own admission makes a habit of arguing for you to do something that they don’t actually want, because they won’t tell you what it is they do want you to do.

However strangely enough women may be exactly right in asking men to solve this riddle. Rather than an obedience trial it’s actually a test of charisma and confidence. She’s not asking you to read her mind, she’s asking you for the charm and swagger to put an idea in her head, and once you’ve left it there – to convince her to want it.

For many woman the idea of giving up control and letting a man “into her head” in this way inspires dreams of steamy romance. Men find the idea of letting someone into our heads terrifying. There’s an element of manipulation that’s eerily reminiscent of evil aliens who’ve shown us in countless sci-fi plots that they’ll only use mind control to enslave humanity, possibly followed by eating us. For us it’s easy to see how this natural dynamic between the sexes exposes women to the control of charismatic and thoroughly ill-intentioned men.

Yet women aren’t without their defenses. One way women have always combated such motherless bastards is by banding together to scold the scoundrel back in line. Communal female shaming is in fact a powerful and highly evolved social mechanism to do exactly that. Initiated by the wronged woman’s tearful pleadings, a group of women come together for the purposes of passing judgment on the man who brought her to that state. He won’t be allowed entry at his own trial to defend himself before this all female court of opinion, but it wouldn’t matter if he was. No evidence he could bring would have any meaning, nothing he could say would explain. To the women his words and seductively clear logic are only hateful “tricks” that make him more guilty. Even him daring to open his mouth on his own behalf is poison to the more evolved sense of right and decency they all agree they alone as women have. He WILL be found guilty, and once summary judgment is pronounced there can be no trial or appeal. There is only surrender and appeasement.

Women realize the importance of this shaming as a social safety net. While it can be said that women want a man who doesn’t listen to them, they definitely don’t want any man to be immune to communal female shaming. The danger of men developing immunity is such a fearful scenario that the failure of any man to respond to shaming raises the entire female community’s shaming defenses to high weapons readiness extremely quickly. The comrade hens initiate aggression, striking with low level hits before most men even know they are under attack, small verbal pecks that quickly begin raining on the man from all quarters. The aggression of their engagement rises with his threat level, and if he continues to refuse to listen and to insist he’s right, his threat level will rise quickly.

Their clucking attacks are no laughing matter. Soon they’ll call other men (known in the manosphere as white knights) to their defense and when that happens there’s deep trouble on the horizon for our anti-hero. The fearsome vengeance of white knights is the real reason few sensible men are either willing or in a strong enough position to brave becoming truly detestable to a group of women. To us in the manosphere such a person is legendarily lawless, a man worthy of admiration and praise. To feminist women he’s a contemptuous devil who infantilizes them by playfully ridiculing their scorn, who abusively confronts them with the hard truth of their errors, and who narcissistically refuses to back down or repent when he’s not wrong. They see no redeeming qualities in him, and in their hysterics this more than justifies inciting other men to do real violence against him. Soon when the woman start to carelessly let fly with false accusations of rape, abuse, paternity, inadequate alimony or child support, workplace sexism or other serious offenses, they will show exactly how hard the heart of a wronged woman is. They will not spare him from any cruel public punishment they can muster. It’s a rare man who can live in this minefield immune from harm.

Every generation has had such extraordinary scoundrels as our anti-hero just as every generation has had far greater numbers of more ordinary scoundrels with the sense to try to learn from their betters by emulating him. But where he eluded the consequences of his actions his followers may not escape as freely. Female shaming is a growing organism that adapts to answer every challenge. It has evolved from being conjured up by the few wives in our ancestral villages or tribes to now being the product of a vast number of women in a bewilderingly greater variety of roles. Today’s shaming circle includes the psychologists who’re constantly refining their labels to describe more misbehaving men, the self help groups encouraging women to share their stories of victimhood, the women’s centers demonizing husbands and fathers, the feminists railing against the patriarchy in the popular media, the heavily feminist family courts, the victim entitlement based government, and the pro-single mom social welfare system. All of these are an extension of the ancestral female shaming which teaches us that when an upset woman appeals to the shaming circle on any issue that holds the communal sympathies, the man who upset her or any man who opposes her is wrong regardless of any explanation.

To some it would seem that our ancestral habit of women communally inflicting shame on men is completely out of place in the modern feminist world where women aim to be equal. However I’m someone who’s always believed that natural selection is smarter than all of us. Human ideals (like feminism) that may be in vogue during one generation may be completely reviled in the next. But natural selection works over a longer period and reveals the real truth in our history. I believe feminism may breed itself out, but on the other hand society may become more feminist. Natural selection will eventually give us the answer as to whether it confers some advantage and is therefore “right”. However I believe that society’s need to shame men actually conflicts with feminism, and that because society’s need to shame men comes from a deep and longstanding truth that has lasted for many more generations than the current feminism, this is another indication that feminism can’t last. I say shaming conflicts with feminism because the shaming circle acknowledges that men have responsibility to protect and care for their women. Shaming men who mis-”lead” women is implicitly an acknowledgment that in some fundamental ways men do “lead” women. Discouraging men from mis-”leading” women is an encouragement for men to “lead” women well, and it’s an acceptance of women’s need to find men who will lead them.

In acknowledging the need for some degree of male leadership in male-female relationships, the female shaming circle is actually an indictment of today’s feminism, as women are deprived of men’s leadership and commitment when feminism removes any incentive for men to commit to the leading male role. Particularly so since in the last few generations feminism has been a powerful force entitling women to their husband’s labor while absolving all their responsibilities to him, encouraging women not to have any loyalty or allegiance to the husbands they have given responsibility for leading them. That feminism disincentivizes men from taking the male role while the shaming circle encourages it pits feminism directly against the shaming circle given to us through the natural selection of human behaviors that proved beneficial to societies over countless eons. Since feminism is working against deep forces that have been in existence for much longer that it has, feminism may only be a temporary blip in human history. Still we’re at a point where men very sensibly see the male role as a losing proposition, and that realization has brought us to a strange crossroads.

Female communal shaming becomes powerless when men withdraw themselves from the possibility of being harmed through any connection to society. Young men only take on roles in which they can be coerced or harmed when they marry, become fathers, are beholden to the society for employment, or partake in one of the many other resources at their shaming community’s disposal. However becoming a man today doesn’t mean getting a serious job, getting married, or even moving out of your parent’s basement. Increasingly men are withdrawing from exposure to any harm.

Instead of society harboring just a few legendarily detestable scoundrels among legions of modest hardworking family men, more men than ever are now are heavily fortified against the shaming circle and so are at liberty to be as lawless among women and as devoted to their own self interests as the worst in history have ever been. Rather than “lead” women honorably they have raised to a religion the GAME of manipulating women’s emotions for their own pleasure. Rather than dedicating themselves to working slavish hours to support a woman who feels no responsibility to cook, clean or be faithful, and who feels entitled to neglect his sexual needs, now that the rewards of relationships are even smaller men are free to instead invest their time pursuing their most far-flung dreams or indulging their most frivolous diversions. Today’s men are more free to bang their way across Europe than at any time since the second world war. Today’s men are more free to go their own way or to become ghosts … all with less public censure than ever.

Young men struggling along difficult soulless career paths so one day they might be a good provider have long fantasized about such an escape. Married men stuck in traffic on the long commute back to ungrateful wives have dreamed forever about a more narcissistic existence free of all that crushing responsibility. But in the past the costs of escape for men were always too high. It’s a strange twist that feminism may be exactly what’s allowing men to set the worst of themselves free and embrace their inner narcissist. Though it’s the only patch of light in the middle of an anti-male dystopia, nevertheless it’s feminism that’s brought this one small gift for men.

{ 49 comments… read them below or add one }

meistergedanken May 29, 2012 at 09:54

“She’s not asking you to read her mind, she’s asking you for the charm and swagger to put an idea in her head, and once you’ve left it there – to convince her to want it.”

It’s called INCEPTION. And even if it’s not almost impossible to pull off, it certainly is a F*cking Chore.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 70 Thumb down 2
Tom Smith May 29, 2012 at 09:58

I suppose you could say that women (and other men) have facilitated this release. There are plenty of websites out there for the unhappy married man looking to have a fling- particularly when there’s an ungrateful wife at home. (The same is true for single men looking to hook-up in a no strings attached relationship.)

The question is: how many married men will really want to risk it all for a short term fling? The answer is simple: More and more, so long as there are ungrateful wives out there, men who work hard, and mercenary single (and married) women who want such men.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2
GS Jockey May 29, 2012 at 09:59

“Rather than an obedience trial it’s actually a test of charisma and confidence. She’s not asking you to read her mind, she’s asking you for the charm and swagger to put an idea in her head, and once you’ve left it there – to convince her to want it.”

Yep. Solid gold.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 5
Nemo May 29, 2012 at 10:14

We are seeing entire societies – heck, entire *continents* such as Europe and North America – slowly grind to a standstill. Men either see no point in working hard to advance society or else they passively oppose society by simply refusing to participate in any social activities beyond the bare minimum needed to sustain themselves.

Over half of all births to women under 30 in the US are out of wedlock. The “legions of modest hardworking family men” are part of history now, just like the legions of ancient Rome. You need a family to be a “family man”, and the current legal system is designed to reward the destroyers of marriage [women file 70% of divorces] and destroy married men. Women have killed the goose that laid the golden eggs.

The beast is starving, and there are fewer and fewer “good men” left for it to consume every year.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Tony May 29, 2012 at 10:18

Natural selection that is. And I find the best example in the population replacement we are seeing in Europe with the Muslims and in the US with Latin american immigrants.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
meistergedanken May 29, 2012 at 10:28

“It’s a strange twist that feminism may be exactly what’s allowing men to set the worst of themselves free and embrace their inner narcissist. … it’s feminism that’s brought this one small gift for men.”

Beware of feminists bearing gifts! I learned this from the Iliad (where’s Seamus the Classicist? He can back me up here…) :-)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 1
Eximio May 29, 2012 at 10:40

No shaming circle for me.

I have fully embraced my inner narcissist. I now only see women as objects to satisfy certain needs. I make no commitments. I tread carefully, but get what I want from women.

This is the only rational path with feminists at the helm.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Raj May 29, 2012 at 10:42

In a society, the women make the men and the men make the women. Women and men in our society are the way they are because that’s what’s rewarded.

” Rather than “lead” women honorably they have raised to a religion the GAME of manipulating women’s emotions for their own pleasure. ”

That’s what the women want you to think: That you are manipulating them instead of they manipulating your behaviour by selective sexual access. The GAME is letting the other think they are gaming you.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 2
Okrahead May 29, 2012 at 10:52

If you view marriage as a contract (and yes, I know it should be more than that, but under our current law it is less than that, so….) you have a situation where one party (the wife) may breach the contract with impunity and trust that she will be supported in doing so by the courts, her friends, her family, her church, etc. The shaming circle was not, originally, aimed primarily at men…. it was actually aimed at other women. The slut, the whore, the town pump, etc. were all outcasts from the circle of other women. Under the new feminazi regime the slut is a feminine ideal (e.g. “slutwalks”) and the whore is a “sex worker”. The old regime of shaming other women recognized that the slut and the whore were the primary enemies of the faithful married woman.
Since today’s married woman has no need to remain faithful (she will not be shamed for being a slut, nor will she lose financial support if she abandons her marriage) the shaming circle needs a new target, and this is why Masters of Game are targeted. The married man, finding himself in a one-way relationship (all responsibilities, no rights; the only party required to honor the contract) he does what comes naturally and follows his best interests. If his immediate best interests are to stay in the marriage and make the best of it, then he attempts to do so. If, however, the wife raises the pain to the point where abandoning the marriage is less painful than staying, today’s man asks himself why he should honor a contract that binds only one party.
For the shaming circle to be truly effective at protecting women, it must return to its original purpose… shaming women who do not abide by their marriage vows and who enable men to violate their marriage vows. Cutting women out of the social circle is far more damaging to women than it is to men, simply due to women’s far greater need for a circle of friends to validate their lives.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 1
Grit May 29, 2012 at 11:20

Shame is crazy because its trying to change the guy’s beliefs AND keep him as part of the group. So its both an expression of rejection yet an expression of acceptance which logically makes no sense. “Damn you for being a heretic! But we love you for who you are!” Thats why an alpha powers right through shame and rises to the top- he thinks “wait, they dont like my beliefs but actually want me? Cool! They will get the picture eventually.” On the other hand, omegas think ” wait, they dont like my beliefs but actually want me? Oh well, i guess that means i have to fall in line and submit. I hate being lonely.”

Alphas have a tendency to expel the live wire from the group, but women WANT to keep him in. If he were out there with no empathy, she would have a harder time procuring resources from him if she were rejected later.

I would argue that actively being shamed is necessary to climb higher. Its like an opening to inject your own philosophy in to a group. They want you to stay with them, but want you to throw away the conflicting belief. Therefore they subconsciously see value to the belief no matter how contrary.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1
AfOR May 29, 2012 at 11:21

s’funny, cos all of the hundreds of thousands of wimminz on PoF ask for honest / good / funny men….

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
AfOR May 29, 2012 at 11:25
Eric May 29, 2012 at 11:56

Ethical:
The bottom line is that women educated under feminism hate men reflexively, and will put a negative construction on any male action or attitude no matter what. The only ‘Game’ a man really needs to know is how to disengage, disconnect, and disunite from feminist culture and the narcissicistic female harpies who’ll prey on him otherwise.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 3
Rob May 29, 2012 at 11:59

Heh, certain parts of this remind me of Lord Chesterfield’s Letter to His Son, which was written in 1748:

…. As women are a considerable, or at least a pretty numerous part of company; and as their suffrages go a great way toward establishing a man’s character in the fashionable part of the world (which is of great importance to the fortune and figure he proposes to make in it), it is necessary to please them. I will therefore, upon this subject, let you into certain Arcana that will be very useful for you to know, but which you must, with the utmost care, conceal and never seem to know. Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; they have an entertaining tattle, and sometimes wit; but for solid reasoning, good sense, I never knew in my life one that had it, or who reasoned or acted consequentially for four-and-twenty hours together. Some little passion or humor always breaks upon their best resolutions. Their beauty neglected or controverted, their age increased, or their supposed understandings depreciated, instantly kindles their little passions, and overturns any system of consequential conduct, that in their most reasonable moments they might have been capable of forming. A man of sense only trifles with them, plays with them, humors and flatters them, as he does with a sprightly forward child; but he neither consults them about, nor trusts them with serious matters; though he often makes them believe that he does both; which is the thing in the world that they are proud of; for they love mightily to be dabbling in business (which by the way they always spoil); and being justly distrustful that men in general look upon them in a trifling light, they almost adore that man who talks more seriously to them, and who seems to consult and trust them; I say, who seems; for weak men really do, but wise ones only seem to do it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 57 Thumb down 3
Eric May 29, 2012 at 12:00

Raj:

‘That’s what the women want you to think; that you are manipulating them instead of they manipulating your behavior”

That explains everything that’s wrong with Game in a nutshell. Feminised women who have been taught that ‘men only think about sex’ are going expect to be manipulated for sex. The Gamecocks aren’t fooling anybody but themselves.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 6
Ronin May 29, 2012 at 12:08

Society in of itself is feminine anyway. Now civilization (Western) is masculine. Shaming equals validation/attention which in turn becomes pre selection that leads to……gina tingles.

Formula:
Shaming (validation x attention)+ pre selection=gina tingles times infinity

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
Ronin May 29, 2012 at 12:12

Comments turn into anti game vs game in 5,4,3,2……..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 7
keyster May 29, 2012 at 12:37

It’s sad it’s come to this, but young men in general aren’t bemoaning and commiserating about the mating climate. They refuse to be victims, they aren’t martyrs. They’re just doing other things.

Used to be, a man no sooner gained freedom from his mother’s apron strings, only to give it up again within a year or two to a wife. Now with women chasing careers before agreeing to “settle down”, this period between mother and wife is extended a decade or more. Women are losing viable mates by their own actions; selfishly assuming “men will just wait”.

And to make matters worse, women and men are competing for the same jobs on a tilted playing field. Why would he want to marry his competitor? That’s not winning, that’s admitting defeat, because now she’ll be his boss.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 4
MKP May 29, 2012 at 12:44

“The fearsome vengeance of white knights is the real reason few sensible men are either willing or in a strong enough position to brave becoming truly detestable to a group of women.”

To an extent, this is probably true … but there are men who are despised by many women and don’t go about in fear of retribution. I know, because I am one. You can protect yourself against the senseless and illogical “revenge” of angry women, and against the white knight supplicants who would mete it out, simply through that most masculine of undertakings:

Planning ahead.

If you are willing to actually put some thought into your actions, your behavior patterns, and what you say and don’t say to people, you can greatly reduce your exposure to child support obligations, sexual harassment charges, false rape allegations, vindictive allegations at work, etc. You can never entirely eliminate the possibility of these terrors, but you can greatly reduce it. It’s not easy, and it’s not something that can be solved overnight, but it can be done. It requires thinking ahead and making good decisions, in the manner of a man, rather than doing what feels good and then blaming someone else for your problems, in the manner of a woman.

This is not intended as a criticism of this essay, which is well-written and makes a lot of sense. Nor is this a criticism of men who HAVE been caught up in the senseless revenge schemes of women; such men deserve nothing but our sympathy and support. But men needn’t hide behind their locked doors for fear of pissing off women. Just be aware and plan ahead. That’s really all there is to it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 3
Troll King May 29, 2012 at 13:01

This is offtopic but I thought it was interesting and sad.

Notice how this woman takes no responsibility, her entire essay is written from the point of view of someone who lacks agency but if you read it closely she made the CHOICES that have harmed her son.

http://mybrownbaby.com/2011/02/mental-illness-and-teenagers/

Read it again, cause this is coming soon to a white neighborhood near you. Here in the south it is already in the middle class homes, not just the trailer parks and wrong sides of the tracks.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 17 Thumb down 3
walking in hell May 29, 2012 at 13:50

The man should be able to say what he wants, and get it; with no questions asked. The woman should look to the man as the head of the house and respect his authority; she should never try to usurp his authority. Her free time should be spent figuring out new ways to make her man happier and how to cheer him up. If the man wants her to work, she works. If the man wants her to stay home, she stays home.

Under no circumstances should she ever try to manipulate the man because this is like witch craft. Her intentions should always be for her family’s best interest; husband first, then children.

Chastity is never an issue because adultery is severely punished by her society; as an adulteress she would disgrace her own family and they would disown her; she would be out in the cold. Her male adultery partner would be similarly punished by society and similarly disowned by his family.

The man and woman by themselves would have a difficult time just surviving; and life without the other and without children would be empty, lonely and meaningless. Her role could be summed up as thus: she makes the man complete; she is the engine behind the man; the addition of her to the mix is a catalyst that can be described as 1+1=3.

Now open your eyes and behold the cesspool before you. What have we become? Some say too civilized. I say filthy, unnatural, and too uncivilized. The fact that we men in the West even tolerate marrying a woman who is not a virgin is telling of our plight; we are thrilled when we find a piece of fruit in the market that has only a “few” bruises compared to the other black pieces.

We spend our time inventing “game” so we can eat and intentionally vomit out the rotten fruit before it before it makes us sick beyond our control.

We spend hours and hours examining the rotting and stinking fruit and try to figure out it’s inner workings and how we can make it taste more “pleasant.”

Some of us who have shopping in the den of rotting fruit for years are so used to eating this pig food, that when something fresh, real, and sweet comes along, we spit it out; our systems are conditioned for repulsion and have become masochistic; so much so that When given an opportunity to shop in a market of fresh and exotic fruit that can stay the digestive course, we run away; we are bitchfied; spiritually and physically.

What happened? I will tell you: no one managed the store; no one pruned the rotten pieces of fruit and tossed them out; no one kept the flies out; and no one killed the flies that got in.

That’s where we are gentlemen; a generation of rotten fruit, good for nothing except fertilizer and pig food. You and I can either contemplate and swallow rotten fruit, go hungry, or go and shop somewhere else. Once the rot sets in, it doesn’t usually reverse its course.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Troll King May 29, 2012 at 14:02

OT, kinda

You guys gotta check out the comments on this feministe post.

http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2012/05/29/high-school-cougars/#comments

It is about girls dating boys that are younger and I think it proves something that I have been thinking and saying for awhile now.

Feminists are largely women who want to be like men in every way possible. The comments section, full of feminists, is full of women talking about how they have dated this or those partners that were years younger than them. They complain about how it is a double standard when men aren’t given grief for dating younger women but women are for dating younger men.

It’s like reverse hypergamy or something.

There are two comments that are very interesting. One sounds like statutory rape and another talks about how she liked dating HS guys while in college, which again would be statutory rape in my state, because they seemed more “innocent”….think about that.

Some gems:

“Ashley 5.29.2012 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

When I was a freshman and soph in college, I often eyed guys that were still in high school because I was so turned off by the typical college party guy. Guys in high school still had that innocent and gentle nature about themselves, and I liked that, which is rare to find the older men get. I mean, I’m 27 now and I’m not looking at guys that young anymore because at my age that would be predatory, but for a 16 year old? I don’t see an issue there”

Atleast she admits it, but she does sound a bit like a ephebophile.

Another one:

“maggiemay 5.29.2012 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

i was dating two eighth graders when i was a senior in high school—and broke up with both of them just before i turned eighteen—reason—the older sister of one of them threatened to prosecute me for dating a minor when i turned eighteen”

Here is Jills response:

“Uh, hmm. Maybe this is me being a judgmental prig, but I don’t think that’s messed up. Seniors in high school are 17-18. Eighth graders are 13-14. I’m not sure it’s ridiculous to say that it’s a little… potentially problematic… for a 13-year-old to be dating a 17-year-old. Thirteen-year-olds are very, very far behind 17- and 18-year-olds developmentally (emotionally, mentally and often though not always physically). And Romeo & Juliet clauses usually deal with age differences of 1 or 2 years, not five.”

Potentially Problematic???? That is all this woman can say??? She is a lawyer and will call you a rape apologist for simply talking about rape while male but here she is excusing a woman who was potentially raping two, not one but two, middle school boys while a adult??? WTF?

Now, to be fair, she doesn’t say any sexual activity took place but even kissing could be considered illegal in my state. And I doubt that these sex positive feminists were not engaging in some sort of emotional and or physical abuse with these boys.

Reading through the comments makes me think about women aping men and men aping women. The feminists want to be men and the male feminists (manginas) want to act like women….sick. Normally I wouldn’t have a problem with people choosing their roles but feminism is all about social conditioning, not freedom or the liberty to determine your own life.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 2
walking in hell May 29, 2012 at 14:05

@Troll King
http://mybrownbaby.com/2011/02/mental-illness-and-teenagers/”

This is a great recommendation and read. Like you said, she caused all this and does not even know it. Look at this quote:

“I remember holding my newborn in my arms at the door of our apartment. It was May. I was barefoot. I just kept thinking, If I can get to the other side of the door, we’ll be safe. I remember standing nose to nose with this beast and I prayed to God as if each word were sacred. If it meant my son would be protected, I was ready for my flesh to be sacrificed and sliced.”

Wow!… “sacrificed and sliced.”
She is presenting her self as some kind of Christ-like, brave and heroic figure ready to give the “ultimate” sacrifice as she is about to bastardize her son and condemn him to a life of mental illness and incarceration.

You brave, suffering soul of a woman.

This story should be required reading for any man that “thinks” he is going to find a “Christian” wife in America. This is the typical American Christian Woman’s attitude in one essay; and the best thing is that it is autobiographical. It is complete with the “I can do no wrong because the Lord is on my side” Nazi prison guard mentality.

I God asks her when she dies, “why did you abandon your husband and destroy your son?”

Do any men go to church anymore? I hope not.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Pops May 29, 2012 at 14:08

This is somewhat related though basically off topic, but here is an enteresting article written a couple of weeks ago:

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/miranda-devine-women-believe-they-live-in-the-age-of-entitlement/story-e6frezz0-1226360978244

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
Opus May 29, 2012 at 14:14

@MKP

… and that is exactly what I did. When I can tell (thanks Foursquare) that she is in a certain Bar I will not go there or anywhere near and were I to find by accident that she is there when I am there I will walk out – and I do not care that my friends say I am over-reacting (as they will and do). False accusations, repeated for no good reason other than to whitewash her slutdom and to blacken me (she’s nuts) I will do all in my power to avoid. Obviously were she to kick off in my absence I would at least not be in any way (my presence) aiding or abetting it though doubtless the usual white-knights (who are only pussy-beggars) will rally to her. What she cannot stand is that I will not do her bidding and put her down mercilessly (and wittily). I guess no on ever stood up to her before.

I suppose you did not need to know that.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2
walking in hell May 29, 2012 at 14:21

@Troll King

Barbaroosa has a video about something like this. I think it is called spousification. It is when the woman subconsciously castrates the son of the father she resents; and she doesn’t even know it. It is really sick and shows why it is mandatory why a man head the household.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
Rmaxd May 29, 2012 at 14:25

@Troll King

So how many guys on that forum, would instantly have men & women rushing on there calling them paedo’s … & calling for the whole thread to be deleted …

Of course men rushing on feministing & calling these women sick child rapists, theyd get their comments deleted

Feminists are basically hideous degenerates in every sense of the word

Complete & scum the whole lot of em …

Feministing, now a haven for women child molestors & rapists … sick bastards the whole lot of them

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 3
Rmaxd May 29, 2012 at 14:42

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 32
MKP May 29, 2012 at 14:51

Perhaps you can point out where I’m wrong, but from here, it doesn’t appear that Eric said a single fucking word about you.

And why would the word “looser” come to mind? Is someone else “tighter” than him?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2
walking in hell May 29, 2012 at 14:55

@Troll King
“http://mybrownbaby.com/2011/02/mental-illness-and-teenagers/”

This is a great recommendation and read. Like you said, she caused all this and does not even know it. Look at this quote:

“I remember holding my newborn in my arms at the door of our apartment. It was May. I was barefoot. I just kept thinking, If

I can get to the other side of the door, we’ll be safe. I remember standing nose to nose with this beast and I prayed to God

as if each word were sacred. If it meant my son would be protected, I was ready for my flesh to be sacrificed and sliced.”

Wow!… “sacrificed and sliced.”

She is presenting herself as some kind of Christ-like, brave and heroic figure ready to give the “ultimate” sacrifice as she is about to bastardize her son and condemn him to a life of mental illness and incarceration.

You brave, suffering soul of a woman.

This story should be required reading for any man that “thinks” he is going to find a “Christian” wife in America. This is

the typical American Christian Woman’s attitude in one essay; and the best thing is that it is autobiographical. It is complete with the “I -can-do-no-wrong-because-the-Lord-is-on-my-side” nazi prison guard mentality.

I hope God asks her when she dies, “why did you abandon your husband and destroy your son?”

Do any men go to church anymore? I hope not.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 3
Jennifer May 29, 2012 at 15:25

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 45
Brian May 29, 2012 at 15:40

Interesting article. I like Ethical’s stuff. Thanks.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
Ted May 29, 2012 at 16:16

“Wow!… “sacrificed and sliced.”

A disturbing component of the female psyche that is surfacing more and more recently.

This is an advertisement for selling jewelry. From Norway, where the women are highly advanced.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jz69Uj7SY5Y

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
crella May 29, 2012 at 17:58

Re the above article…

‘My son has been diagnosed with ADHD and Oppositional Defiance Disorder. ‘

A kid being a stubborn undisciplined brat is now a disease!? A disorder? It’s because people think this way that they can’t parent , can’t control their kids.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 2
freebird May 29, 2012 at 18:16

Leviticus 20:10-21
Enforcement of these laws would correct the abominations.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
criolle johnny May 29, 2012 at 18:56

crella
I’M tired of seeing a diagnosis of ANYTHING when the problem is just an asshole.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
migu May 29, 2012 at 20:15

I’ll say it again. Women are born knowing game. It’s useful for a man, but no matter how you cut it, the man is but a marionette in the devil’s dance. This is the realm of woman. Man’s realm is the world outside.

A man has the advantage in the field, he is master of the world. Woman is master of the man. The minute either sex thinks they can be master in the realm of the other chaos and corruption ensue.

This is a good balance. Each sex can utilize the other for mutual benefit. An abusive woman will ruin her household and be master of none. An abusive man will lose mastery of the world pursuing mastery of woman.

The law on the otherhand denies this reality.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 1
LastCrucible May 29, 2012 at 21:34

Fuck a group of women shaming a man. That’s laughable. It’s the ‘white knights’ who put the teeth in the bite. Without the ‘white knights’ as enforcers women’s group shaming tactics are as fearsome as the “bite” of an infant. The lesson? Feminism is ultimately not about women. It’s about bitch-ass men.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
TiredGuy May 29, 2012 at 22:48

“It’s the ‘white knights’ who put the teeth in the bite.”

Which is why it is key to educate boys and young men. I remember back when I worked at a small restaurant a young man and his parents were talking about how he “wasn’t finding someone to grow old with”…

“Mum, I love you, but you don’t understand. You’re a lady, but there are no ladies my age – just whores and sluts. Do you really want me to get married to one of those?”

I didn’t catch the rest of the conversation as I had to go back to the pantry to lift out some more rice sacks, but it was encouraging to see a young man, maybe eighteen explaining the situation to his parents. Whilst I can’t say for certain, his father was very neatly dressed, and acted extremely politely – so it takes no leap of the imagination to guess he was a white knight.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0
Eric May 29, 2012 at 23:17

MKP:
Rmaxd has somewhat of a history of attacking other MRAs (and rarely ever saying anything constructive). The ‘stalking’ he’s suddenly so concerned about occurred because I tried to force him to answer some of the false accusations he’s made against various MRAs. He dodged all those, but looks like he’s up to his old tricks…

“The word loser comes to mind…’
Considering he’s such a strong PUA advocate, I would think that he’d be busier ‘pumping and dumping’ all the hot women (that PUA guys assure us they all get on a regular basis) than trolling here sabotaging the MRM. But, like he says, I ‘just don’t understand Game’ LOL

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Eric May 29, 2012 at 23:27

Crella:

‘A stubborn undisciplined brat is now a disease?’

It’s part of the dumbing-down of our culture generally. I hate the way the media takes clinical terms like ‘disorder’ and ‘addiction’ and tries to use them to excuse bad behavior or bad habits.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
Eric May 29, 2012 at 23:41

Ted;
That video just goes to show what ‘female empowerment’ looks like drawn to its logical conclusions.

One of the worst aspects of feminism is that it not only depreciates men, but abhors anything traditionally feminine as well. Women have become increasingly brutalized under feminism. Note the number of violent crimes committed by women have escalated during the last few years, and taking on an increasingly sadistic character as well.

This, though, is what comes of teaching women to suppress feminine qualities. A culture that teaches that the object of marriage is divorce and the object of pregnancy is abortion shouldn’t be surprised if the females it produces are Amazons.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
migu May 30, 2012 at 00:57

Give rmaxed a few more weeks.

He’s up to around five blatant contradictions. He just pulled the mentally ill accusation.

So far he has failed to get anyone to bite. Pay attention to his language. We’ve seen it before. He’ll escalate, someone befriend him, watch what happens.

Eric is referring to him accusing keyster of being a plant. He used Leonidas gault as an authority. It was rather asinine.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
migu May 30, 2012 at 00:58

Keoni gault

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Höllenhund May 30, 2012 at 10:22

I’v only read the beginning of each paragraph and I have to say this creeping gynocentrism makes me yawn. Women this, women that, women do this, women do that, come and hear why women do this or that etc. It’s all about women, women, women, just like the mainstream media. It seems everything has to be about women. I can no longer open a news site or a newspaper without at least one column specifically about women.

I’m tired of it all and no longer care. Fuck women. Let them eat cake, or rot or whatever. I just want to go my own way.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1
Gilgamesh May 30, 2012 at 10:33

From what I gather Oppositional Defiant Disorder was invented to deal with political dissidents (In additon to boys who won’t sit still).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Eric May 30, 2012 at 13:21

Hollenhund:
I second those sentiments wholeheartedly. I’m so sick of hearing how to placate these bitches when they aren’t the slightest bit interested in giving anything to men in return.

I think that men should take the attitude that when women start behaving as though they were worthy of male attention, we’ll give them some.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Eric May 30, 2012 at 13:31

Gilgamesh:
That’s another component to using these clinical terms. It causes less public uproar when the State decides that ‘treatment’ needs to be imposed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Sam May 30, 2012 at 16:57

Very interesting article. I have grown immune to women’s shaming tactics, but it took me years to do it. It’s like we are programmed not to displease women (mothers?). Still, reading your article made me angry. Angry that women can so easily manipulate men. If the fact that more and more men are having nothing to do with women is infuriating those bit*h’s, then good!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: