Time Scoops Newsweek in Raging Cover Shot War

Post image for Time Scoops Newsweek in Raging Cover Shot War

by Uncle Elmer on May 17, 2012

Time Magazine, seeking to re-establish its pre-eminence in the ferociously competitive glossy news magazine market while reaching out to the powerful new majority of Millennial Women and their disposable incomes, has realized that mere vaginalogues and masturbation seminars are not enough to raise their market presence above the noise of countless bloggers and commentators. What Time has to offer in contrast to these brash, ignorant amateurs is Professionalism, and in a brutal face-off with co-weekly “Newsweek”, which limply tried to create buzz with it’s “Gay Obama” cover, has upted the ante in a daring move that stimulates competitive rivalry and ultimately, benefits us all.

By now you’ve seen Time’s “controversial” magazine cover showing breast-feeder Jamie Lynne Grumet staring vapidly into the camera as only a professional “model” seems capable of doing. Her pose and expression smugly condescends the rest of the planet for not being advanced enough to understand the wonders of breastfeeding.

Jamie’s a breastfeeding advocate, and recently took her jugs and tit-feeders to a “nurse-in” at a Los Angeles Target store to express outrage that somewhere, somebody may have been advised to cover up her breasts while feeding her child in public.  Shades of global Slut-Walks engendered by the Toronto Police Department’s Assistant to the Traveling Public Safety Outreach Officer’s comment that young women should dress appropriately and be aware of their surroundings to avoid getting raped.

But Jamie doesn’t stop at merely breast-feeding her natural son and putting him on the cover of a tired hag of a magazine that now litters dentist’s offices and airline gates across the nation; she wants everyone to know that her adopted Ethiopian son gets to enjoy the ameliorative effects of liberal white women’s body fluids as well.

In a blog post describing “adoptive breastfeeding” she provides a lovely shot of her white and black kids co-grappling with her tits while exchanging the gaze of true brotherly love.

She explains for the less open-minded : “Samuel had been curiously watching me breastfeed his brother (Aram, 2.5 years at the time.) He didn’t speak English, but in his curiosity he was able to convey that he was also interested…When I asked him if he would also like to breastfeed he smiled and jumped right on my lap. ”

Then the knee-slapper : “It helped Aram understand Samuel’s role in the family and he was completely equal.”

Anyone who has grown up with brothers and sisters or has more than one child can well predict how Aram will bond with his “brother” as they progress through life. Sharing the jugs of plenty is sure to quell any nascent sibling rivalry as Aram and Samuel grow up together. And by taking it to the cover of Time Magazine to reap the resulting media firestorm, Jamie has certainly raised the bar for celebrity females making a public spectacle of their trans-racial adoptions.

 

{ 90 comments… read them below or add one }

Anna May 17, 2012 at 09:03

Wow. Seriously, it’s bad enough when celebrities cash in on normal baby/child pictures, but that’s just disgusting on three levels:
1 – he’s too old to be breastfeeding
2 – adoptive mothers breastfeeding adopted children is creepy. Also, unless they’re already naturally lactating, they have to go through hormonal treatments to induce lactation, and I don’t understand why they would put their body through that.
3 – no parent should be distributing photographs of their children breastfeeding at all. That will only embarrass the child later in life (or, in the case of this boy, right now, since there’s a good chance he’s attending school.)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 9
Journey May 17, 2012 at 09:38

Living in the west is like watching a car crash going on for decades. Except it’s just so fucked up now you don’t know whether to scream with laughter or with horror. Lefty loon women like this have become a laughing stock, if only they could realise it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 114 Thumb down 1
Szebran May 17, 2012 at 09:45

That cover is hysterical! Good editing.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 2
keyster May 17, 2012 at 10:04
durandal May 17, 2012 at 10:12

The legacy dinosaur media is on life support and desperate to remain relevant and push its own twisted narrative at the behest of its masters. Our suspicions confirmed from alternative sources, its owners intentionally promote an emasculating, subversive and demoralizing message under a “progressive” label to the majority population. In light of the new media, it is shown to be more and more detached from reality & basic human nature. Defunct ideological sewage that is instinctively repulsive to the average reader. The masses are waking up and no amount of perversion or distraction can change that fact.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 0
meistergedanken May 17, 2012 at 10:20

from her blog: “Every Ethiopian person I’ve encountered finds adoptive breastfeeding and extended breastfeeding normal (Wet nurses are still commonly used in certain areas of the country) One Ethiopian woman said- “If there is milk we use it!” She said breastfeeding eight-year-old children is not an uncommon practice…”

Yeah, well, if I was living in a failed state with rampant famine and starvation and there was no solid food anywhere, I guess I would drink breast milk too! File this under “waste not, want not”. The pathetic part is that this woman mistakes a coping strategy born of pure desperation and indicative of a primitive society on the verge of collapse with an “enlightened” approach to child-rearing.

P.S. – How come Elmer gets his article published AND I DON’T???

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 2
Contraricos May 17, 2012 at 10:21

Try this one.

It’s less a political twofer than the propaganda piece published above however, in polite consideration of our white nationalists sensitivities.

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/60172000/jpg/_60172130_timecover304.jpg

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
Norm May 17, 2012 at 10:24

Micheal Savage ripped into this cover last week on his talk show. He said this is borderline child porn. About the woman on the cover, he said she has the look on her like many women who are taking psychiatric drugs from NYC have. The look that says, “Don’t look at me, I’m better than you”. Then these women go to their therapist wondering why nobody talks to them.
About the boy. Savage says he will probably end up working for Al Gore as a cameraman.

Like the photoshop cover change.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 51 Thumb down 1
Paradoxotaur May 17, 2012 at 10:29

Why, oh why did I ever let my subscription to Time magzine expire!

I fully expected to see Elmer’s old mug Photoshopped onto that nipple. Thank God for small favors.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
Journey May 17, 2012 at 10:31

Keyster said:

This one is better:

http://www.fireandreamitchell.com/2012/05/15/are-we-nanny-enough-time-magazine-parody/

That is just brilliant. Can you imagine if America had a truly free and diverse media with mainstream magazines having that as a genuine cover poking fun at the establishment. Like in a genuinely free (and even fun) country.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
Ethical May 17, 2012 at 10:51

Great post! LOL.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
dragnet May 17, 2012 at 10:51

“Anyone who has grown up with brothers and sisters or has more than one child can well predict how Aram will bond with his “brother” as they progress through life.”

Why the scare quotes around ‘brother’? Samuel and Aram are adopted brothers, that’s hardly in dispute.

You wouldn’t put scare quotes around a ‘son’ adopted by a ‘father’, would you?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 34
Rmaxd May 17, 2012 at 10:56

Im guessing you guys still dont understand how your human rights hating western dictatorships work ..

This is whats known as a justification campaign, banning free speech isnt enough

They want censorship & criticism as socially acceptable norms

You’re being conditioned, softened up for the new tyrannical laws coming your way …

This is why …

This womans a complete & utter loony tunes …

This isnt adoptive breastfeeding … this is breast feeding children waaaay past the age of suckling …

Adoptive breastfeeding is the use of a nanny, in the place of a mother, it has NOTHING to do with age …

Another case of a deranged liberal feminist, using catch phrases to fool the masses into turning her deranged loony tunes behaviour, as a victim

A Mother Theresa of the media, as she bravely becomes a victim of less enlightened anti-equals …

This is pure propoganda

There’s laws coming into effect against calling people names & insults …

Looney tune liberal propoganda as above is the justification …

Enjoy your right to call each other dip sticks & ass-holes while you can …

This is a propoganda play …

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 0
LysanderSpooner May 17, 2012 at 11:31

It is long past time to head for the hills, the wimminz can fend for themselves.

Timed and Newsweak are both up on EBay for .99 cents.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 0
Highwasp May 17, 2012 at 11:37

Looks like all one needs to do is change the word Man to Mom in NAMBLA and we have the same message…

“NAMBLA (National Organization for Mom/Boy Love Association)
North American Mom/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) was formed and inspired by the success of a campaign based on the Feminist’s community to defend against a local witchhunt.

NAMBLA’s goal is to end the extreme oppression of mom’s and boys in mutually consensual relationships by:

building understanding and support for such relationships;

educating the general public on the benevolent nature of mom/boy love;

cooperating with lesbian, gay, feminist, and other liberation movements;

supporting the liberation of persons of all ages from prejudice and oppression.

Our membership is open to everyone sympathetic to mom/boy love and personal freedom….” blah blah blah

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 2
by_the_sword May 17, 2012 at 11:40

Dear Time Magazine,

Thanks for the mammaries!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
Towgunner May 17, 2012 at 11:47

Why do I hate feminism? This waste of skin “model” has no conception of just how dam lucky she is! I can’t stand how these progressive liberals think. Just so she can be the first person or first women too “blank”…to what??? have a school aged kid suck on your tit in front of the whole world? I mean, how pathetic of a person…how needy and insecure can you be…you really need attention this badly? And with our entire monetary system under severe threat of collapse…f’ing breast feeding older kids and in public is worthy of the front page. If I ever had the chance to address this absolute worthless person, I would say to “it” (I’m not even going to dignify it as a human)…you were born with a lot of pluses on your side. You did nothing to deserve these pluses, you just happen to become conscious in an above average attractive physical body. Chances are actually against many of us, its how things work. If you want to do the moral thing and be “compassionate” towards the less fortunate start by expressing gratitude for the dumb luck of being born attractive. For God sake, how can she not even understand how lucky she is not to be born in Ethiopia? But we don’t see anything close to thanks…no, we see a defiant “I’m better than you” glare at us all, declaring us unfit just like the ayrans once said of non-ayrans. This is it; I declare today that women are animals.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Eric May 17, 2012 at 12:02

Uncle Elmer:
The feminist mainstream media displays its hypocrisy once again.

How much do you want to bet that those bozos over at ‘Time’ (or whichever media cartel owns it now) would denounce a picture like this appearing in ‘Playboy’ as ‘female exploitation’?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 39 Thumb down 0
J May 17, 2012 at 12:19

WOW!

I don’t have words to describe how uch I want to slap that C^#1.

Honestly, what were her REAL reasons for adopting that little boy, he does not even speak English yet? Can she even talk with him?

And the best she can do is claim it is so they don’t have a rivalry between “brotheers?” Our media can make great movies, and thats about it, when it comes time for politics we need to send them to”actual work” in thrild world war zones! That way they can understand in truth what is wrong with them and their ivory towers, but they still need to go!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
Eric May 17, 2012 at 12:39

J;

I was thinking the same thing. That kid DOES look a little bit beyond the breast-feeding stage to me too.

I think I that if I were a social worker I would be paying extra- scrupulous attention to some of these unmarried women adopting pre-pubescent boys like this. But any social worker who did would likely get fired for it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 0
keyster May 17, 2012 at 12:39

Can you imagine if America had a truly free and diverse media…

We do.
It’s the New Media movement.
It’s right here as an example.

It’s why the liberally biased MSM is doubling down on it’s slant.
They’re losing control of the leftist/feminist narrative.

They tried to silence conservative dominated talk radio through the “Fairness Doctrine”. They don’t know what to do about the internet and they’re in a panic.

Bloggers are the best, most honest journalists we have right now.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 3
Baltika May 17, 2012 at 12:43
Journey May 17, 2012 at 12:51

Hi Keyster,
Okay I see what you’re saying. I guess when I think of media I just think of them, the main stream media as all of it. So I was thinking of one of them, a nationally available mag like Time having a photo attacking Obama or a feminist loon, and how great that would be. But you’re right, there is a lot more media than just them, it’s just not the “official” line. But the fact there is an official line and people outside of it are labelled and face being shut down is why I think of a lack of freedom.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
BB May 17, 2012 at 13:05

An interesting observation I’ve had. In every case of overage breastfeeding I’ve seen, both in real life and pictures/ads/news, the child was a boy, not a girl.

-B

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel May 17, 2012 at 13:47

dragnet
Why the scare quotes around ‘brother’?

Because they’re not brothers. Brothers have the same mother and father.

Average IQ in Ethiopia – 63 .

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 12
Rmaxd May 17, 2012 at 14:03

Fathers4Justice Leader Banned from Olympic Games

http://www.metro.co.uk/olympics/899224-fathers4justice-leader-matt-o-connor-faces-olympics-ban

Matt O’Connor, who has tickets for one event, was told police were trying to ban him from entering the Games and going within 100m of any venue or the torch relay.

Mr O’Connor, who lives 15m from the flame’s route in Andover, Hampshire, said: ‘There is absolutely no way on God’s earth I’m going to be restricted from attending.’

The restrictions are expected to be confirmed in Westminster magistrates’ court on Monday.

Fathers4Justice campaigns to ‘ensure fathers play a fundamental role in the parenting of their children after parents separate’ and is known for scaling buildings dressed as superheroes as a means of protest.

It says it ceased its direct action campaign in June 2008 but continued campaigning through direct talks with successive governments up until June 2011.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer May 17, 2012 at 14:22

Paradoxotaur May 17, 2012 at 10:29

I fully expected to see Elmer’s old mug Photoshopped onto that nipple.

———————————

Trigger Warning! Image may be too intense for some viewers :

http://www.the-spearhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ElmerTime.jpg

EmanTheDesperateHouseboy May 17, 2012 at 14:23

Breastfeeding to nurture: 100% NATURAL

But doing it to politically ‘whore’ yourself for media attention: 1000% DELUSIONAL

Crazy momma…

EmanTheDesperateHouseboy

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel May 17, 2012 at 14:29

Uncle Elmer
Trigger Warning! Image may be too intense for some viewers :

Outstanding! Dude, you are a one man wrecking crew.

Great article too.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 4
JFP May 17, 2012 at 15:08

There is only one way to describe this woman and Time, they are attention whores.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 0
AfOR May 17, 2012 at 15:15

noooooooooooo elmer, you put your head on the wrong body………..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
LysanderSpooner May 17, 2012 at 15:16

@Charles Martel

The Kenyan IQ is 72.

Not sure if this is true, but certainly entertaining, a bit off topic, but maybe worth a look. After all, he is a mangina and our first ghey El Presidente…lol

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3
Journey May 17, 2012 at 15:21

Elmer said: quote

Trigger Warning! Image may be too intense for some viewers :

http://www.the-spearhead.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ElmerTime.jpg
end quote.

That is just brilliant, the feminists would go silent in total shock if they saw that in one of their “workshops”.

As it got stuck in moderation Keyster here’s my reply about the media.
I see what you’re saying. But I guess when I think of media I just think of them, the main stream media as all of it. So I was thinking of one of them, a nationally available mag like Time having a photo attacking Obama or a feminist loon, and how great that would be. It would be like freedom, like there is no one official position.
But you’re right, there is a lot more media than just them, it’s just not the “official” line. But the fact there is an official line and people outside of it are labelled and face being shut down is why I think of a lack of freedom. I want lots of different opinions and none of them sanctioned by the state like a national religion.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
MRA May 17, 2012 at 15:40

OT

Remember the Facebook co-founder?

“Well, Schumer (D-NY) and Casey (D-PA) are mad as hell and they’re not going to take it anymore. They will call Saverin’s $67 million tax “duck” an “outrage” today in their press conference when they detail the rest of the Ex-Patriot act.”

Well now liberals want to get his money anyway
http://techcrunch.com/2012/05/17/still-smiling-eduardo-senators-schumer-casey-want-to-collect-your-67m-in-facebook-taxes-anyway/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 3
keyster May 17, 2012 at 16:13

For those of you that might have disagreed with me that it will be Conservative Women who fight feminist governance lookie here:

http://www.saveservices.org/2012/05/pr-house-approves-violence-against-women-act-save-applauds-long-overdue-reform-measures/

Please take a moment to thank bill sponsor Sandy Adams (R-FL) for taking a stand for accountability of funds and equal protection for men.

http://www.sandyadams.com/contact.php

This is politics.
This is how it works.
There is NO WAY a man would have or could have, gotten this done.

It obviously won’t pass Harry Reid’s Senate and would be vetoed by Obama anyway, but it’s a step in the right direction,

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 10
TiredGuy May 17, 2012 at 16:19

Yet another barrier to be used against men.

I love how the feminists are trying to present it as if he only has a tax bill of $67 Million, rather than telling the truth – he has already paid $330 Million to the US government based on what he earnt there, and the $67 Million is what he will probably pay to the Singaporean government – after all, thats the taxes he has to pay on what he has earnt while in Singapore and not America.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Geography Bee Finalist himself May 17, 2012 at 18:23

Well, Schumer (D-NY) and Casey (D-PA) are mad as hell and they’re not going to take it anymore.

The former gives New York a bad name. Unfortunately, there’s plenty more like him where I live. I will never vote for Senaturd Schumer, who can take his outrage and shove it up his ass. Doesn’t that motherfucker have better things to do? Too bad he’s not up for re-election until 2016. Any Pennsylvanians know if Casey is also a real senaturd?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Paul Murray May 17, 2012 at 22:50

“An interesting observation I’ve had. In every case of overage breastfeeding I’ve seen, both in real life and pictures/ads/news, the child was a boy, not a girl.”

Well spotted! A quick enquiry at google images will confirm the hunch. How many of those women suckling 6 and 8 year-old boys are single mums, do you suppose? My guess: all of ‘em.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Rmaxd May 18, 2012 at 00:49

@Keyster

The only conservative woman here, is you …

Conservative women also enacted the No-Fault Divorce, for life alimony, child support, debtors prisons … you name it conservative women voted for it … in the millions

Seriously take your vagina worshipping ass & take it to Jezebel … I understand they love lesbians like yourself …

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 15
Anna May 18, 2012 at 01:34

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 18
freebird May 18, 2012 at 03:54

I’ve seen that pic several times and never noticed it was a black boy on a white tit, I guess I’ve gone color blind.

All I saw was a a midget on a chair engaging in foreplay with a taller wymyn.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 1
bruno May 18, 2012 at 04:45

She didn’t have to show it on the cover of a magazine.
Everybody knew already why she adopted that boy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Wet Willy May 18, 2012 at 04:55

A woman breastfeeding uncovered in public…. an inalienable right.

A man discretely urinating outdoors … sex offender’s list.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 0
walking in hell May 18, 2012 at 06:23

@Rmaxd
“You’re being conditioned, softened up for the new tyrannical laws coming your way …”

You said it. I just found this article in a popular Mormon Magazine:

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/865555246/2-simple-ways-to-overcome-the-effects-divorce-has-on-fatherhood.html?pg=2

The article describes a man’s experience with long-distance divorce.

If you read the article, you will notice how the man takes most of the blame for his divorce. Notice how passive he is about his predicament. Also notice the comments in the article. They are from a female praising the man for being a “good” dad.

Here is the conditioning:
1) if a divorce happens, you as the man are to take the blame.
2) if your wife takes the kids hundreds of miles from you, you are to rejoice in your new role as “long distance” father.

Last but not least and most disgusting, we find this implied message.
Heavenly Father (God) is distant from us, so it is ok for Earthly fathers to be distant fathers.

The man is obviously a saint and making the absolute best out of horrible circumstances. I am disgusted that he (and me) have to suffer this punishment. This article shows the depth of conditioning in America and the false idea that the man is always responsible for a divorce: as if those virgin Mormon Girls could do no wrong.

The article also shows the wide spread presumption in the churches that children should be with the mother full-time, which is absolutely false.

The Mormon Church could set a great example by requiring couples to stay married in order to not be excommunicated; but they don’t. Instead they do like every other church in America: pander to the vagina and back it up with propaganda like this.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Thos May 18, 2012 at 06:31

You guys really, really need an article submission flag or something.

There are probably more men than women raped in the United States every year—most of them in prison. Best estimates put the annual number of prison rapes at about 140,000, which is 50,000 more than the 90,000 or so rapes of women reported to police. Gang rape of the most brutal kind is common, and weaker prisoners often seek protection from a “daddy” who fights off other predators in exchange for total submission and sex on demand. There is an ugly racial dimension to prison rape: Blacks and Mexicans deliberately seek out white victims, and black-on-white rape is probably more common than any other kind. Prison rape is an appalling secret in a country that prides itself on human rights.

http://www.limbicnutrition.com/blog/mating-calls-the-horrific-reality-of-male-on-male-rape-in-us-prisons/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
David G May 18, 2012 at 07:00

“An interesting observation I’ve had. In every case of overage breastfeeding I’ve seen, both in real life and pictures/ads/news, the child was a boy, not a girl.”

I see 2 possible explanations for this.
1 – It has sexual undertones
2 – It’s a political statement showing the dominance of a woman over a male, and a male needing a woman.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
Jay May 18, 2012 at 07:35

If the kid is old enough to make a pb and j sandwich I think it’s time to leave the nipple alone.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
walking in hell May 18, 2012 at 07:40

More despicable propaganda. Check out the title of this article: “Fathers who fail are costly for families and economies: but dads can bounce back.” This is from a Mormon magazine. The “blame and hate the man” shit is so thick, it has infected every nook and cranny; every church is infected; every woman is infected; no man is safe.

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765575241/Fathers-who-fail-costly-for-families-economies-but-dads-can-bounce-back.html

I maintain that all men should not bounce back; they should bounce out. Bounce out of America and into the arms of some grateful Asian or Latina.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
keyster May 18, 2012 at 07:43

The Mormon Church could set a great example by requiring couples to stay married in order to not be excommunicated; but they don’t. Instead they do like every other church in America: pander to the vagina and back it up with propaganda like this.

The divorce rate in the Mormon church mirrors the national average. I lived in SLC, Utah for 3 years and I was surprised it was so common.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
walking in hell May 18, 2012 at 07:45

http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765575241/Fathers-who-fail-costly-for-families-economies-but-dads-can-bounce-back.html

There is some hope with respect to this despicable article. Most of the comments brought up the “misandry” problem in some way shape or form. These were mostly men. If we men really united in an organized way (multi-million man marches and protests, storming of courthouses, etc) and we organized irrespective of race and religion, we might be able to affect some change.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
walking in hell May 18, 2012 at 07:48

@keyster
“The divorce rate in the Mormon church mirrors the national average. I lived in SLC, Utah for 3 years and I was surprised it was so common.”

I know. And the man really gets the shaft because Utah operates under the tender years doctrine and most Mormon Women are stay at home moms. What is really annoying is that the church covers this up. Without the strong family sales pitch, what does the Mormon church have?

My wife was Mormon and she absolutely ruined me.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
keyster May 18, 2012 at 07:50

Conservative women also enacted the No-Fault Divorce, for life alimony, child support, debtors prisons … you name it conservative women voted for it … in the millions.

Your disdain for conservatives and conservatism obviously takes precedence over men’s rights. A conservative woman does something to dare stand-up to the biggest feminist pork project ever, and you refuse to see any good in it…because 30 years ago conservatives voted for things specific to women. That was then this is now. Where were you then, in the same place you are now?

I’m daring to be pragmatic here, not a blind idealogue that can’t see past their own anger and hatred.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 10
walking in hell May 18, 2012 at 08:02

@Rmaxd

“Conservative women also enacted the No-Fault Divorce, for life alimony, child support, debtors prisons … you name it conservative women voted for it … in the millions”

True. Conservative Women have that old bullshit belief in the man as “bread winner.” Conservative women also want to be stay at home moms, thereby condemning the man to alimony and work slavery. Conservative women want to stay home while their brave military husband gets his face blown off in a war. The “tender years” doctrine is another conservative woman’s invention.

I know a girl who was once very promiscuous; she even had an abortion when she was sixteen. Then she got married and had three kids. She is now a proponent of the “conservative” movement. Her husband works like a dog to keep her obese ass happy.

It is not a liberal/conservative woman issue; it is a man/woman issue. Those men who are divided along the liberal/conservative line don’t get it. Now, at this time in America’s history, there needs to be a party that represents men and men’s issues, irrespective of liberal or conservative, irrespective of religion; irrespective of color. Will that happen? I don’t think so. But I hope so.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
Rmaxd May 18, 2012 at 08:40

@walking in hell

Guys like Keyster & other conservatives, live in some sort of warped 60′s fantasy

Women always vote for whats good for their daughters, theyre trained to hate their sons & husbands

Guys like Keyster pick this hatred of men, from the women & manginas around them …

Guys who hate gamers & conspiracists & the rest of vast movements created by men, generally do so because theyve been trained to hate men by the men & women around them …

Men hating groups of men, isnt anything new, its just a shame seeing it proliferated by asshats like keyster etc. ..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 15
keyster May 18, 2012 at 08:42

If we men really united in an organized way (multi-million man marches and protests, storming of courthouses, etc) and we organized irrespective of race and religion, we might be able to affect some change.

…there needs to be a party that represents men and men’s issues, irrespective of liberal or conservative, irrespective of religion; irrespective of color. Will that happen?

Ain’t never ever never gonna happen brother.
It’s a fantasy many new to the movement cling to.
Men will NEVER mount up against women.
It IS political, because EVERYTHING is political.
You have to take what you can get, and co-opting the Republican Party (like Feminists co-opted the Democrats) is the way to do it. And it will NEVER openly be about Men’s Rights, because it can’t be. The disease that is political correctness won’t allow it.

I’m not a Republican and I don’t have a hard-on for conservative women, like some with overly sensitive MRA shit-test meters seem to think. I want to exploit them to affect change today, regardless of what happened 30 years ago. Liberal men and women won’t do it, certianly Democrats won’t. Conservative men can’t do it and won’t do it. Only Conservative women; both pundits and politicians.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 5
Rmaxd May 18, 2012 at 08:48

@Keyster

So are you going to respond to this? All I’ve seen you do so far, whine & shill for movements who enabled feminists to begin with …

Im guessing some truths are too close to dismantling your mainstream drone like existence …

“Conservative women also enacted the No-Fault Divorce, for life alimony, child support, debtors prisons … you name it conservative women voted for it … in the millions”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 8
Samizdat Jones May 18, 2012 at 09:27

If we men really united in an organized way (multi-million man marches and protests, storming of courthouses, etc) and we organized irrespective of race and religion, we might be able to affect some change.

Not at all. Our greatest strength is when we swarm individually in the same directions. That makes us unstoppable, because we unite under the banner of ideas, not men. If we each one of us spread out we cannot be stopped or marginalized; but provide organization and hierarchy and we will allow ourselves to be sidetracked and subverted by feminism and instigated infighting.

Organizing the way you seem to wish for simply leaves us vulnerable to the strengths of our opponents. By swarming we turn those strengths against them and make it our own. Our best method of change lies in informing our brothers and waking up our fellow men. Once it is clear how misused and hard done by we have become, more and more men will walk away from this corrupt society–without our continuing consent to be slaves and to enforce our own enslavement on our brothers the whole thing collapses.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Lara May 18, 2012 at 10:11

My grandmother pointed this picture out to me, and called this woman a jerk. I think her breasts are too saggy for Playboy anymore, but Time magazine has lower standards.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 15
Lara May 18, 2012 at 10:14

dragnet,
Why would they adopt a kid right around the same age as a kid they already have? If they really wanted to adopt, why not just wait until their biological son is older.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 16
Lara May 18, 2012 at 10:23

dragnet,
That would be like your parents adopting a boy from Russia who was the same age as you. If they already have you, it seems unnecessary.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 16
Eric May 18, 2012 at 12:37

Keyster:
I don’t agree with your politics, but at least you’re offering a plausible solution. Dunderheads like Rmaxd only want to burn everything down and have no idea of what to do next.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
Eric May 18, 2012 at 12:48

Walkinginhell:

The problem with political solutions, either liberal or conservative, is that they are not being driven by people who understand the issues. Any government worth having at all is going to have to be controlled by MEN who have an actual stake in the nation and who put limits on partisanship and interest-peddling.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer May 18, 2012 at 15:36

Time Magazine, after posting this atrocious adoptive breast-feeding cover story, has the nerve to turn around and label Wall Street men as “creepy” :

The Creepy Dudes of Wall Street: Are Finance Guys Losing Their Mojo on the Dating Scene, Too?

Rmaxd May 18, 2012 at 15:41

Actually I’d label Eric & Keyster as creepy .. for their ridiculous ignorance of basic politics … lol

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 12
Lovekraft May 18, 2012 at 16:03

Had a leftist co-worker bring me yet another of his conspiracy theories (this time about Paul McCartney being dead for decades etc etc) to which I replied that he should be more worried about Greece and Europe dragging the world into financial sludge.

Leftists created most of these problems yet prefer to keep chasing imaginary dragons.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
Rmaxd May 18, 2012 at 16:05

Btw Im interested in REALISTIC solutions, I have NEVER pushed for politics, which is WHY I come down so hard on people like Keyster …

Politics especially close minded, male hating political parties, like conservatives, republicans etc., are a plague on our society

White males thanks to white guilt, liberalism, manginaism, white knighting, & the total & absolute corruption of our courts & police force, are now the REAL politics driving society as a whole

Justice is now a currency for irrelevancy, as victimisation & liberalism take over & are now the basic policy, used in courts & the police force

The solution is SIMPLE, MASCULINISE MEN, & PUSH FOR MENS RIGHTS

Men have to push back, they have to retake whats rightly theirs

Men make up 50% of the population, in order to effect any REAL change, you HAVE TO ADDRESS the MALE NEEDS OF THAT 50% of the population

It is madness to think we can sidestep, the INCREASING emasculation of men, & the marginalisation of mens rights, by appealing to women

We have to address the needs of the 50% MASCULINE population on THEIR TERMS & THEIR NEEDS

There are no quick fixes, no popularisation, we HAVE TO ADDRESS MENS NEEDS DIRECTLY

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 8
Eric May 18, 2012 at 16:19

Rmaxd,
‘I’d label men like Eric and Keyster creepy.’

LOL—does Keyster belong to the same cult as I do?

‘I’m interested in realistic solutions’

LOL—that’s the funniest thing you’ve said yet, Tunnel-Mouth. So far, your solutions have been a lot of trash-talk and bashing other MRAs.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Eric May 18, 2012 at 17:17

David G;

In a larger context, I wonder what the attitudes of the media or government would be if there were a sudden increase in single men adopting young girls? Do you think there might be some suspicion as to the men’s motives? I wonder where that suspicion is in the case of these ‘heroic single moms?’

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
American May 18, 2012 at 18:04

Gender, gender-Raunch feminist style parenting are in effect crippling many of our nations boys.
Perversions to American law enforcement have turned dating women into a “Legal Liability” for hetero-males, and we are now witnessing an explosion of single desperate moms who cannot find a man brave (or stupid) enough to date women, which is in effect making some attention desperate women who are seeking attention with their children who are too old to be sucking momas tits.
The perverse manufactured statistics Alliance between Gender, Gender-Raunch feminism and American law enforcement is having some un-intended consequences for Americas children who will feel the desperate end to this “neo perverse Alliance”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 4
American May 18, 2012 at 18:16

America is just starting to reap the social consequences to the perversions of American law enforcement; that have turned hetero-relationships with women, “A LEGAL LIABILITY” for males.
The current “manufactured statistics” from American law enforcement are not only a stain on the institution of law enforcement, but are in fact un-constitutional.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 4
freebird May 19, 2012 at 02:11

You got that right american.
The judges and courts are fully insane and are willfully blind to integrity.
It is sad that the man in blue on the street continues to enforce these evils.
It some serious cognitive dissonance that allows them to believe they have the moral high ground.
In the end this damages their own lives, as they see criminality in any and every behavior, including those of their loved ones..

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Brigadon May 19, 2012 at 08:36

well, considering that every judge and lawyer in this country is literally a traitor, that’s unsurprising.
Look up the oaths of the bar association. The Bar association is actually headquartered in London. The Bar association literally swears an oath to the queen.
Swearing an Oath to a foreign queen is literally an act of treason.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Eric May 19, 2012 at 11:13

Brigadon:
Not only that, but the Bar Associations freely operate as an independent government. They carry out tribunals for their own members accused of wrongdoing and impose sanctions, or acquit, or the ultimate penalty is disbarment. They do not refer these cases to civil authorities, unless a warrant is issued, which rarely happens.

Then these same hypocrites enriched themselves suing the Catholic Church for doing exactly what they do. Then the media jumped on the bandwagon and accused the Church of a ‘cover-up’ (even though, unlike the Bar, the Vatican openly admits that the Church is a foreign entity and reserves the right to try its own members).

Do you think we’ll hear anything about a Bar Association cover-up from the media any time in the near future? LOL Not likely.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Eric May 19, 2012 at 11:19

Freebird:
‘It’s sad that the man in blue on the street continues to enforce these evils.’

This is something I’ve never understood. Ask an even an average Ameroboob, and he’ll agree that the government’s corrupt and the laws are unjust. But, they’ll add, that they ‘support the police’ or ‘our troops’. To my mind, these enforcers are just as bad as the people who send them out to do the dirty work.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Brigadon May 19, 2012 at 12:18

And people wonder why I support Lawyer Landfill.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Duke May 19, 2012 at 12:26

Is that Obama’s son?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Brigadon May 19, 2012 at 12:33

@Eric-

I think I do need to illustrate a slight difference between the different sorts of armed forces, and the fact that some should be supported, and some should not.

Regular Armed forces- These people should be supported. They are trained to fight wars, and for the most part they are necessary. They are being used inappropriately, but most of them join for patriotic or decent reasons, and are literally ordered to oppose an illegal order from a superior. The only reason they do not is brainwashing and fear, not personal rancor.
Sheriff’s department- These are our duly-elected representatives with very strict boundaries. For the most part, they exist simply to keep order, not to go around trying to find out what laws a particular person broken. Their evils are, in general, due to policies they are forced to uphold.
Federal Marshals- These investigators are specifically created to help stop heinous crimes that cross state borders. Their structure and jurisdiction are very strict, and they should be supported when possible.
Police Department and federal police department (FBI)- This is a socialist military structure designed specifically to repress rebellion and impress conscripts into a workforce (prison). They are charged with finding every law that anyone breaks, usually based upon whatever would be most profitable. The police department are not voted in, nor do they have the consent of the governed. They should be opposed whenever possible, for they are an invasion force. Their primary mandate is to keep people from defending themselves effectively.

Bear in mind, that MOST 3rd world countries are ruled by military dictatorships springing from the last group, as these people are trained and capable of performing a military coup at any time. and frequently due. Bullies and sadists tend to gravitate towards ‘police departments’ since there is almost no oversight, and no ability for the public to influence their power. The Nazi Party was a ‘police force’, as is the NSA, the secret service, and virtually anyone else that employes mercenaries to control it’s own population.

It is possible for an individual ‘policeman’ to be ethical, just as it was possible for the occasional member of Hitler’s SS to be ethical… but you do not get ahead in these organizations by having a conscience or honor or empathy. Even being willing to be part of such a corrupt structure shows that you are dishonorable enough to warrant punishment by a citizen’s tribunal.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Eric May 19, 2012 at 13:33

Brigadon:
And notice, too, that the government has gradually been phasing out the first three groups. Besides feminising the military, they’ve also phased out a lot of military functions to ‘private’ contractors like Blackwater &c. Also, too, funding for sheriff’s departments and federal marshals and has been cut and their jurisdictions taken over by DHS, NSA, &c.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Senior Manchild May 19, 2012 at 15:53

From Keyster,

¨Ain’t never ever never gonna happen brother.
It’s a fantasy many new to the movement cling to.
Men will NEVER mount up against women.
It IS political, because EVERYTHING is political.
You have to take what you can get, and co-opting the Republican Party (like Feminists co-opted the Democrats) is the way to do it. And it will NEVER openly be about Men’s Rights, because it can’t be. The disease that is political correctness won’t allow it.¨

I fully expect to wake up one day in the near future, to find the pressure pan has blown it´s lid clear through the roof. Somebody left it on the stove turned to high.

E Pluribus Unum? Really?

It looks like about all Pluribus and no Unum. And the last dedicated soldiers( white men) are leaving the field.

¨Men will NEVER mount up against women.¨

No, they seem to be taking the easier route; They are mounting down.

Maybe Obama can keep this country together long enough to win in November; but increasingly this pluribus mess looks ungovernable. He seems to me to be long on swag and short on dedication; he may come to regret even considering a second shot at this big mess, hahaha.

Oh and yes, the old women, conservative women are going to start to make themselves heard all irritable about everything. I would be irritable too if my wealth was being lost to the same degree. Let´s see if they can put Humpty-Dumpty back together again.

No, I don´t think men will rise up against women to anyway near the degree that they will increasingly be non-performing. The new media will come to dominate the old. The veneer of political correctness is thin, weak. We will soon enough be living in interesting times.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
American May 19, 2012 at 17:08

The new Gender, Gender-Raunch style feminism that now completely dominate American universities have gotten so “Empowered” only because of their “misinformation Alliance” with American law enforcement.
For instance, according to many non biased non perverted studies, women initiate 70% of physical violence in American relationships, and if the law enforcement “perversion” was ever to be corrected, that would mean that 70% of domestic violence calls would end in arresting women.
Now this reality of 70% of people arrested in domestic violence calls being women, would quickly take away the inflammatory rhetoric that Neo Gender, Gender-raunch are using to Inflame their way to empowerment, on campuses around the country.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
American May 19, 2012 at 17:10

Folks Im just sick and tired out hearing loudmouth Gender-raunch Inflaming the masses against the innocent.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Opus May 20, 2012 at 07:57

@Brigadoon and Eric

I had not contributed to this thread but I feel compelled to correct, so far as I am able some of the more (if I may say so) fantastical assertions, that I here read:

I believe I can fairly say that members of The English Bar do not swear an Oath of Allegiance to Our Sovereign Monarch (at least I cannot recall being asked to do so when I was called to The Bar) – and in any event my allegiance was not so much to The Bar itself as to the particular Inn where I was called (there are four).

There may be an Institution called the International Bar Association – which may for all I know may be quartered in london – but I would be rather surprised that if I were to learn that oaths were being made to The Queen – especially for members who are citizens of other countries, but I cannot say as I am not a member nor do I need to be, as a member of The English Bar.

Whilst it is true that lawyers (on their clients instructions) may sue for damages, institutions such as The Holy Roman Catholic, lawyers are happy to sue anybody, because that kind of thing goes with the terroritory. Like all organisations The Inns of Court have their own internal rules which they administer. Should a reprimanded member feel that they have been dealt with in an inappropriate or illegal manner, they may seek judicial remedy against the Bar just as any one dealt with internally by their employers or professional organisation may do so.

Of course, I think the idea of using lawyers for landfill is an excellent idea – and am happy to submit my own list of proposed candidates for filling.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Eric May 20, 2012 at 19:42

Opus:
I don’t know what Brigadon’s source was about the Bar; but it’s not the first time I’ve ever heard it.

I don’t know whether or not you guys are having the same problem in England; but over here, we’ve been having a serious problem with the rise of these amphibious, ‘public-private’ entities. These groups are also not infrequently headquartered outside the US. The problem with them is basically this: they take on public responsibilities that legally belong to the government, but are excused on the grounds that are ‘service industries’ or ‘contractors’ whom the government hires. But, at the same time, they ignore all regulations (including Constitutional ones) that typically bind governmental agencies; on the grounds that their status as ‘private entities’ exclude them from compliance.

The reason nobody over here is able to protest these usurpations effectively is because of a legal manoeuvre called ‘Implied Consent’ (I’m not sure if this part of British law or not). For example, when they put the porno-scanners in the airports, (run by a government contractor with an exclusive monopoly), there’s no way to protest since the courts would say that by purchasing an airline ticket, I ‘implied consent’ to that humiliating procedure. It’s no argument that I might have no alternative to flying somewhere; or that no ‘private’ airline is allowed to offer a scanner-free service; or anything else. It’s basically that you forfeit your rights with these ‘private’ companies, since they have all the immunities of government but none of the responsibilities.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Brigadon May 21, 2012 at 00:40

Someday, someone will realize that corporations were the most evil inventions mankind ever dreamed up. An ‘immortal person’ with all of the rights, and none of the responsibilities of a human. No morality, no mortality, no ethics, no humanity, no room for competition, no fear of law, no ability to be punished, and no goal other than the accumulation of power by any means possible.

if there is an ‘antichrist’, it is the inhuman ‘person’ of the corporation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Opus May 21, 2012 at 05:11

@Eric

I have no idea.

What we do have are what are Quangos: an ancronym which stands for Quasi Autonomous Non-Governmental Organisations. They are agencies of the government but are something of a law unto themselves. Their powers are wide-ranging and there frequently seem to be little control over their activities.

I imagine this was the sort of thing that you had in mind. The International Bar Association would not, however, appear to be an organisation of that type.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Eric May 21, 2012 at 11:10

Opus:
From your description, it sounds like the ‘Quangos’ are what they’re trying to develop over here. The American Bar Association operates like one in America. I remember reading in the BBC a few years ago that British Quangos were trying to set up operations in Russia, but Putin kicked them out when he found out what they were up to. The American versions were going into Georgia, but Putin went down there and handed Cheney and Sorros a good spanking too.

I think Putin is one of the few world leaders who actually sees the danger of what Americans describe as the NWO.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Brigadon May 21, 2012 at 13:03

William Gibson is looking more and more prophetic. Only without the cool wetware.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Like a G-6 May 21, 2012 at 23:03

I find nothing wrong with this. Boob milk is better than the cooked (pasteurized) cow’s milk-crud you get at the store any day!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Al Thompson May 22, 2012 at 21:00

I think this is a prelude to advocate child abuse. Look at her evil, bitchy face. Very good looking, but she has the look from hell. She isn’t dressed modestly and the whole picture is just rotten. Remember, since the homos are their way, the next perversion down the road to hell will be child abuse.
The liberals are sick perverts. I know this may sound a bit off the hook, but just wait. Remember the nonsense with HBO (Homo Box Office). That is flagrant child abuse, and no one gets arrested at that company.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2012/04/hbo-shows-graphic-pornography.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Dave July 10, 2012 at 16:45

I can remember back in-the-day, when I subscribed to it, Time Magazine was a news journal.
It has since degraded into a populist-feminist women’s rag-publication.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: