Feminists Starting to Lose Their Cool

by W.F. Price on March 13, 2012

A couple pieces from Huffington Post illustrate the fact that men are starting to finally stand up for themselves, and feminists are fighting mad about it. Commenter Rocco linked an article about hundreds of male bloggers who took Huggies to task for portraying fathers as bumbling idiots when it came to taking care of their kids, and Golden Scepter linked to another in which a feminist goes berserk and gets bloody.

The former involved an ad campaign – the kind we all know so well – in which Huggies diapers and wipes were portrayed as so easy to use that even fathers can get by with them:

The company thought it had a winner of an ad campaign — a series of spots all filmed during five days spent in a house with real dads and their babies. “To prove that Huggies diapers and wipes can handle anything,” the female voice-over explains, “we put them to the toughest test imaginable — Dads.”

[...]

…What they didn’t take into account, however, was another trend — the one where the growing number of men who consider themselves involved, equal parents (according to the US Census, one in three are their child’s primary caregiver) are more than a little sensitive about being portrayed a the butt of an advertiser’s joke.

[...]

Soon, there was a petition. Created by Chris Routly, a father from Breiningsville, PA, it was titled “We’re Dads, Huggies. Not Dummies.” And it said:

“Why is a dad on diaper duty an appropriate or meaningful test of the product in any way a mom using them is not? Why reduce dads to being little more than test dummy parents, putting diapers and wipes through a “worst-case scenario” crash course of misuse and abuse? Is that what HUGGIES thinks dads do? We leave our children in overflowing diapers because sports is more important to us? Really?

These HUGGIES ads literally use the line “Dads push diapers and wipes to the limit.” No, HUGGIES, dads don’t do that. Poor manufacturing does that. A large bottle before naptime does that. Feeding your kid too much fiber does that. Babies do that. But dads don’t use diapers and wipes any differently than moms.”

Good for Chris Routly. Lots of fathers take care of their kids these days (if the mother doesn’t get a judge to kick him out of their lives), and they do a fine job. In his comment, Rocco pointed out that this wouldn’t have happened five years ago. This is true. Men tried to play nice up until a couple years ago, but now they are standing up for themselves unapologetically, and it’s working. Somehow, I think we have something to do with it.

However, not everyone is ready to recognize that men have the right to stand up for themselves. The next article, linked by Golden Scepter, is a violent tirade penned by man-hating lesbian Kelly Cogswell. In it, Cogswell uses graphic imagery to emphasize a list of the same old women’s grievances (many of which have long-since been debunked), and betrays a searing hatred of men that recalls the glory days of feminism from the 90s, when feminists cackled with glee over the mutilation of John Wayne Bobbit, defended child murder (the postpartum kind), and sang angry, dysphonic punk music about rape and bloody revenge. The difference is that today she comes off as deranged, whereas this kind of unveiled hostility was the norm a mere 20 years ago. She also exposes the “logic” behind the recent sham legislation feminists have introduced in state legislatures for what it really is: tit for tat retaliation.

Here are a few excerpts:

Thursday was International Women’s Day, and like always, there was some guy saying, “Why isn’t there an International Men’s Day? Yuk, yuk.” And while the usual response is, “Every day is a men’s day, you asshole,” maybe it’s time to agree.

After all, if you really believe in equality in everything, why not push for equal salaries for men? The poor things have been suffering for years with all that excess income. Give me a petition. I’d be happy to support a 25-percent reduction in pay across the board.

[...]

And for all those guys envious of the probes and procedures that Virginia’s women are going to be subjected to before they can get a simple abortion, why not pass laws requiring prostate exams whenever they demand a refill of Viagra or a package of condoms?

[...]

We could send out gangs of women to harass young males and grab their asses on the subway or bus. And if they don’t like it, respond, “That was a compliment. What’s your problem? What are you, a fucking homo?” Or these gangs of women could go out with machetes or bottles and really get their hate on. Just for the sake of equality.

And why not arrange for men to get little chunks of their penises chopped off wherever women face genital mutilation? After all, they get a party afterwards, celebrating their enforced chastity, painful pissing, and fear and loathing of sex. And if men manage, nevertheless, to get themselves accused of adultery or having sex before marriage, we could beat them to death, or stone them, just like women.

[..]

In fact, it’s far easier to take it the other way and literally level the playing field. Cut the legs off the Titans and watch them crawl. Unleash poverty and chaos and violence and degradation for all. Yeah, why not equality?

It seems that men’s demands for fair treatment have struck a nerve with the likes of Kelly Cogswell. Her reasoning is irrelevant; we’ve heard it all before and debunked it so many times that it would be a waste of time to respond to her rote recital of feminist grievances. What’s important here is the snarling contempt she betrays and, most of all, the fear. Yes, Kelly is scared. She isn’t scared that a man will beat or rape her (here she is), and she isn’t scared she’ll be attacked by an angry MRA or fathers’ rights type — she knows that’s highly unlikely. No, she’s scared because she feels the initiative slipping away. She can see the pedestal tottering and about to topple over. She knows the free pass to hate on men and victimize them in the courts is about to be revoked. Her life’s work is in danger of crumbling before her eyes.

This is why the feminists are showing their ugly side these recent days. Expect it to get even uglier soon.

{ 152 comments… read them below or add one }

M March 13, 2012 at 03:26

Embrace the feminist hatred. It obviously means the initiative is now with the men’s rights movement.

No man here, however, should delude himself into thinking that because the tide is beginning to turn, that we’re free and clear. Time to double down our efforts to reverse the perversions of feminism.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 180 Thumb down 3
Steve_85 March 13, 2012 at 03:28

“This is why the feminists are showing their ugly side these recent days. Expect it to get even uglier soon. ”

You imply that they have a pretty side. Feminism is ugly to the core, it will take much more than just turning it around to make it anything other than an ugly hate movement.

Hydrogen Peroxide would be a good start.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 120 Thumb down 2
scatmaster March 13, 2012 at 03:29

My penis just did a reversal into my butt crack looking at that piece of protoplasm.

I used both disposable and cloth diapers on my son.
Washed the cloth ones and hung them out to dry as well.
Fuck Huggies. Just switch to Pampers or some generic brand.
Show your support monetarily to them.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 100 Thumb down 2
Lovekraft March 13, 2012 at 03:39

The ability to destroy, or deconstruct, or criticize, which is the modus operandi of feminists and their progressive ilk can only be taken so far before it faces the inevitable question: “Now What?”

And this stage is fast approaching. Speech has been controlled, behavior is subject to bureaucrat oversight, art must conform to PC (thus rendering it either inaccessible or stale) etc etc etc.

Mr Price is right: the long winter is coming. Prepare yourselves physically and spiritually.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 94 Thumb down 1
HarryLagman March 13, 2012 at 03:53

The Guardian ran a counter-backlash piece the other day. A feminist saying to women who weren’t feminists something along the lines of “hey 33 years ago I was in Canada and I had to get my husband or someone to sign something. Do you want things to go back to that stage?”

Common arguments at the moment. Stories are told of a past of unimaginable horror and persecution towards women (nonsense), and the warning that if women don’t get massively political now, things will slide back to that awful state…!

People commented that sexism seems to be the default for most people. They meant sexism against women – quite unaware of the irony of what they were saying…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 87 Thumb down 2
Twenty March 13, 2012 at 04:02

In fact, it’s far easier to take it the other way and literally level the playing field. Cut the legs off the Titans and watch them crawl. Unleash poverty and chaos and violence and degradation for all. Yeah, why not equality?

A tidy synopsis of the equalist project. It overlooks the fact that if you cripple Atlas, the heavens fall.

“[P]overty and chaos and violence and degradation”? Exactly how well do these she-beasts think they’re going to do in that environment?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 67 Thumb down 1
Iano March 13, 2012 at 04:19

Feminists Starting to Lose Their Cool

They never had it from the beginning.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 1
Iano March 13, 2012 at 04:23

why not push for equal salaries for men?

This chick is right. Women police officers in the UK get paid more than men because of something known as a uniform allowance.

They are equal pay them the same.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 1
migu March 13, 2012 at 04:34

Equality huh?

Sure, I would be happy to cut my hours in the office by 25%. I don’t need the extra cash.

Nevermind, I’d just get fired.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 68 Thumb down 0
Opus March 13, 2012 at 04:41

As Welmer says, and as you can see from Cogswell, – as well as L on the previous thread – Feminists are indeed losing their cool. This is not surprising as women always act thus when cornered and where they have no decent arguments in support of their claims for preferential treatment. Even if they did (and L, as I commented on the previous thread, had one she could have used, but miserably failed to do so) they, like L, are too angry to use them properly and then resort to ‘fish-wife’ language. Has there, with the possible exception of Paul Elam’s friend ever been one single female who has commented here, who has got beyond name-calling, and other insults (I exclude Lara who is a simply dippy attention seeker)!

The Manchester Guardian (Marxist MSM) article or at least a similar one from a Ms Grant received a lot of flak from anti-Feminists indeed I have just had a go at her on Twitter.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 3
Traveller March 13, 2012 at 04:43

Good.

Small bit by small bite, a little mouse can break a dawn and wash a valley.

Maybe it is small sign, after all, feminists were always full of hatred and frustration, so it is difficult judge their reactions.

But anyway, dedicated to those who complain MRA did never a concrete effect, here and in other alternative blogs (you know who you are).

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 1
Traveller March 13, 2012 at 04:44

Eh I mean break a dam…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Days of Broken Arrows March 13, 2012 at 04:47

Cogswell’s piece was under the “comedy” banner of Huffington Post. At least one commenter is wondering whether it’s a parody of feminist anger.

The fact that there are a lot of negative comments about it on HuffPost says a lot, too.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 50 Thumb down 0
Nehalem March 13, 2012 at 04:59

“And why not arrange for men to get little chunks of their penises chopped off wherever women face genital mutilation?”

I think you are referring to male circumcision there, which is a common practice.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 0
ecnayonnA March 13, 2012 at 05:02

the tricky part is waking up the men to misandry. the hard part is when the feminists react to all their ill gotten privileges being taken away from them.

we live in such interesting times.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 1
Somehow Somewhat March 13, 2012 at 05:09

Feminist loosing cool: ain’t it an oxymoron?
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Ed8NPX3AfbAJ:alcuin-constant.blogspot.com/2011/03/oxymorons-and-tautologies.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

As feminism progress, women are becoming less happy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXeszLlTX5E

“Guerrilla-Marketing” technique: “Offend the men, get into the news, more publicity, after-all men are not the majority of buyers anyway” seem to be at play here.

Until when one brand seriously suffer monetary backlash from misandry, they will not easily stop producing man-hating commercials.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 2
finndistan March 13, 2012 at 05:09

Not condoning anything, just being a messenger.

Thomas Ball immolated himself. He was desperate, he wanted to make a point.

“Her life’s work is in danger of crumbling before her eyes. ”

The thing is, even if I believed it was unlikely, with the feminists recent outings in the past few months; in their radical, usually under the rug, covert, hidden attacks now being out in the mainstream, now I believe it is likely that there will be many more Thomas Ball’s (god rest their soul), and among them will be few of the feminist versions of Breivik.

It is nearing the point that not only their life’s work in danger.

But they brought it upon themselves.

About their funding, it will continue at the expense of every other necessary funding, until there will be no support system in place to catch them when the system crumbles under their feet, and crash it will.

With my recent chats with men, it is very clear to me that especially the productive portion of men have gotten/are getting pissed at their earnings confiscated to up to 50% directly (70%-80% with the indirect taxes), with nothing to show for it except being blamed for earning more.

And each of these men, keeping silent to some point open their mouths once they find a like minded man, and it happens that there are other men in the vicinity who either are a silent part of the conversation or eavesdrop.

You cannot undo what the eavesdropping to that event that I mentioned in my blog (plug plug) causes:

“Women still have it worse in the workplace”
“How? Of the people that die at work, 95% of them are men”
“Yes, but retired higher level nurses are still stressed”
“At least they retired”
“I got to go”

I like these outbursts of the muffington posters, of the jizzedbells. their hatred, their irrationality, their call for violence, their evilness needs to be in the open so that the bluest of men can see the filth that is promoted under humanism these days.

Good men are becoming wounded animals in the corner, and these idiots are still lashing at them.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 2
finndistan March 13, 2012 at 05:15

Harry Lagman

“Common arguments at the moment. Stories are told of a past of unimaginable horror and persecution towards women (nonsense), ”

Exactly. Nonsense.

Putt all the abused, oppressed, persecuted, raped, killed women together, they still will not be able to number up to a miniscule fraction of the men that died, were blown up, lost eyes, limbs, were raped, died in mines, blizzards, storms, while protecting and providing for the women they apparently oppressed.

Now, add to that the question, “which is worse, being raped, or unknowingly raising some other woman’s child” (a modification of welmer’s previous question), to which the answer will again be the latter, and combine it with the lower level of 10% of the estimates about cuckoldry.

In this case we do have a “worse that rape culture”, with at least 10% men “worse than raped”, at the hand of women, encouraged, and licensed by the feminists.

How’s that for evil?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 48 Thumb down 1
dragnet March 13, 2012 at 05:18

For all the in-fighting in the manosphere, it’s worth pointing out that the combined efforts of both PUAs and MRAs have gotten us to this point. Sometimes that gets lost in all the back-and-forth and alt-right/white (knight) nationalist bullshit.

You’re exactly right, Welmer. This is about the declining social capital of women and how this waning is eroding their leverage in other arenas of American life. They can sense the earth shifting underneath them. And they have only themselves to blame. We have given women total control over every facet of the most vital human function: reproduction. We’ve given them the power to ruin men with one accusation. They’ve been given economic power and their sexual power has become completely unfettered. We’ve made marriage a joke on their behalf. All of this newfound strength and authority and they are still whiny, unfulfilled, unhaaaaapy and agitating for ever more control to the point where it infringes on basic liberties and what is left of the core masculine identity. They’ve gone too far and men are waking up.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 88 Thumb down 7
dragnet March 13, 2012 at 05:19

Jesus freak fucking Christ that photo is mortifying!

Put a trigger alert on that shit or something!!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 63 Thumb down 3
Pierce Harlan March 13, 2012 at 05:28

And yet MY blog is accused of fomenting “hate” speech by the southern whatever it is called, a formerly influential organization — and the one post of mine they cited to support that epiphany is this one: http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2012/01/off-topic-it-takes-woman-to-get-things.html

Compare my post to the one you cite.

We’ve tumbled down a rabbit hole so deep we’ll never be able to crawl out.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 67 Thumb down 1
E March 13, 2012 at 05:38

a searing hatred of men that recalls the glory days of feminism from the 90s, when feminists cackled with glee over the mutilation of John Wayne Bobbit, defended child murder (the postpartum kind), and sang angry, dysphonic punk music about rape and bloody revenge.

I grew up during that time, I agree those were some weird times. IMHO it was the 90′s when Feminist power was at it’s peak. Their grip on society was so powerful they could say just about anything without being challenged.

Some examples off these outrageous Feminist claims popularized during the 90′s
1. 100,000 women die each year from anorexia
2. the number one cause of child birth defects is husbands beating their wives
3. husbands are unnecessary. Children grow up just fine in single mother households
4. men are unnecessary. There’s enough sperm stored in sperm banks to theoretically create an all female human race on this planet.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 61 Thumb down 1
David March 13, 2012 at 05:46

If you have debunked what she was saying, then why not provide links to it, at least? It takes up no more space, and leaving it off leaves newcomers like me with no resources to read. I don’t know what phrases to use to dig through your archives, or to google with.
Help a brother out, throw me a bone here.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 19
NJArtist49 March 13, 2012 at 05:47

“And why not arrange for men to get little chunks of their penises chopped off wherever women face genital mutilation? After all, they get a party afterwards, celebrating their enforced chastity, painful pissing, and fear and loathing of sex. And if men manage, nevertheless, to get themselves accused of adultery or having sex before marriage, we could beat them to death, or stone them, just like women.”
Raging, foolish woman is too cowardly to state that this genital mutilation occurs in Mooslem societies. Else she would have to face a crowd of knife wielding jihadis demanding her death for insulting Islam.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 64 Thumb down 3
Ray March 13, 2012 at 05:55

“Feminists Starting to Lose Their Cool”

…and they were always so dignified – NOT!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 39 Thumb down 1
American March 13, 2012 at 06:04

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 40
MRA March 13, 2012 at 06:07

“That was a compliment. What’s your problem? What are you, a fucking homo?”

Women already do that, specially the younger one, you can’t refuse sexual attention from from them without being labeled as gay, when was the last time a woman was called lesbian for no liking a man grabbing her ass?

It is just like calling every false rape/sexual assault accuser lesbian.

http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5081/5191464432_c32955553f_z.jpg

Darn, maybe she is the one of the many on the slut walk, who feel victim of sexual attention.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 47 Thumb down 2
Ray March 13, 2012 at 06:09

“No, she’s scared because she feels the initiative slipping away.”

…but taxpayer funded colleges and universities still haven’t canceled a single women’s studies program so the feminist freeloader’s scam will continue to be perpetrated at taxpayer’s expense.
http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h53/MRA_06/P4150031.jpg

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 2
American March 13, 2012 at 06:10

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 36
V10 March 13, 2012 at 06:23

@NJArtist49

There is a certain perverse glee to be had as feminists learn what misogyny really is, as fundamentalist Islam grows exponentially in some jurisdictions. Demands for Sharia, with the numbers to push for it as a voting block, are going to run up against a dwindling supply of men willing to fight (either apathy/antipathy for women or supplicating multiculti liberals) and no children to swell the future ranks.

Ideally, enough formally ‘progressive’ European nations will be reduced to petty semi-theistic despotism to serve as an object lesson. But those on what we generally call the Left (men and women) have never been particularly good at facing reality.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 2
ahamkara March 13, 2012 at 06:49

I was fed and raised on the feminist bullshit of the 90′s. I didn’t attain my freedom until my ex-wife left me and took my money to find greener pastures – and then I realized – I don’t need her, or any woman. I was always taught to believe that it was the men who couldn’t live without the women – but women have insisted on contributing so little and taking so much that they have made themselves obsolete. I couldn’t get full custody of my children – I only got half – but if I could get full custody, my children would be better off for it. I could keep the “child support” that my wife throws away each month and actually spend it on the CHILDREN – imagine that – maybe they could even go to college someday! They will, anyway, because I’ll see to it – I’m the only one who can. Their mother is nothing more than a burden. I can see why women are so protective of their uteruses – it’s the only thing they have left that is of any value.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 56 Thumb down 4
Rorschach March 13, 2012 at 06:53

In regards to the piece by Kelly Cogswel – it is tagged as “satire”.

Though, since it is written by a lesbian feminist, it’s clear that this is not the impression it gives since so many other feminists have written this kind of thing and meant every single word.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 2
criolle johnny March 13, 2012 at 06:58

” Her reasoning is irrelevant … ”
It’s not REASONING, dammit. It FEELING. She is incapable of reasoning.

Yes, Kelly is scared. She is angry, anger comes from fear. Fear turns to The Dark Side.
Look at the damn picture. That’s Yoda’s evil cousin.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 2
AfOR March 13, 2012 at 08:02

Bitch has a face less appealing than a just extracted fag’s buttplug.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 6
zimmy March 13, 2012 at 08:07

Kelly Cogswell is a victim of sexual inattention.
Nothing is more maddening to a woman than that.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 63 Thumb down 2
Uncle Elmer March 13, 2012 at 08:09

The “women are angry, no they’re really angry this time” meme is getting a lot of press play in the last few weeks, no small thanks to that Rush Limbaugh character, with whom we are all now in cahoots with. (“They’re all Rush Limbaugh now!”).

As if last year’s Summer of Sluts was not bad enough, we’re gonna have to go through another round of wailing and hair pulling, though like most women’s outbursts, we will be baffled by their exact complaint. That they are now spilling oceans of ink dissecting the minutae of the word “slut” and its myriad of subtle connotations, is only a harbinger of exasperating days ahead for the collective American male.

Why just yesterday ForbesWoman made a Clarion Call :

“Where are the angry American women?”

http://www.forbes.com/sites/annedoyle/2012/03/12/nobel-laureate-leymah-gbowee-asks-where-are-all-the-angry-american-women/

Elmer, ever the helpful co-worker, points out where they can be found :

elmer 13 hours ago

The “angry women” are sitting in Encorpera cubicles across the nation, seething with rage that following feminist directives has turned them into empty, sterile co-workers while their male peers are cheerfully chasing younger gals and otherwise living the good life unshackled from marital burdens.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 83 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer March 13, 2012 at 08:17

What Kara Swisher (Really) Thinks About Boys, Girls And Getting More Women Into Tech

http://www.forbes.com/sites/meghancasserly/2012/03/12/what-kara-swisher-really-thinks-about-boys-girls-and-getting-more-women-into-tech/

elmer 12 hours ago :

Men, who are 50% of the population and support 99% of the other 50%, are damned tired of this incessant whining about “women in tech” and the demands for yet more red-carpeting for girls and women because of their “feelings”.

I work in tech. Nobody helped me or encouraged me, I just did it, most often in the face of cut-throat competition. It’s been a long, difficult slog.

Fact is, women are my competition, plain and simple. No woman helps me attain business. Women compete for jobs but do not create them. And while men try to shank me, only men provide me opportunity. Women can only shank me and deprive me of opportunity. More and more men are becoming acutely aware of this phenomenon as they compete through life with pampered, entitled females.

And thanks once again for calling for genocide against white males, those insufferable bastards that invented the internet and every “social media” tool that you are demanding ought to have more female overlords. Also the Obama flyer is great for understanding that he truly wants to push the men down even further.

Sophia Yen 4 hours ago :

As an Adolescent Medicine specialist (someone who spent an additional 3 years after pediatrics residency to specialize in teenagers) and woman who went into medicine, I think the most important thing you can instill in your daughter is confidence – you are smart and can accomplish whatever you set you mind to, and you are beautiful.

That’s why I helped to co-found SheHeroes.org with 2 fellow MIT alumnae – to show young people (boys and girls) that women can be anything they work hard towards. Please donate so we can profile more STEM and engineering women. And watch the videos with your young people.

Elmer, while maintaining his professional demeanor, of course notices his new, efficient Asian chick co-worker :

elmer Just posted

Asian women are so hot!

And White Feminists hate Asian women even more than they hate White Men. But the author was careful not to say “white male, white male, Asian chick, white male, white male, Indian dude, white male, Asian chick….etc etc” because that would be RACIST! and SEXIST! too.

But please do not subject any boys to your “SheHeroes” campaign. The poor bastards get enough confusing nonsense jammed down their throat by the feminarchy, the two boys profiled at the beginning of this essay being a perfect example.

My own wife is a Hot Asian Chick too. She was a successful entrepreneur, but is now a stay-at-home chef and sextoy, as profiled in my essay, A Man Wants a Wife, Not a Co-Worker :

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/02/20/a-man-wants-a-wife-not-a-co-worker/

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 57 Thumb down 4
Anonymous age 69 March 13, 2012 at 08:17

American men have been the automatic supermarket doors. No matter what women did, for over 45 years, men kept ‘manning up’, kept supporting women and kids they never got to see. Kept sacrificing their lives to save relatively worthless women. Kept marrying. Kept apologizing when ever dearies spread more misandric lies. Like the automatic door which opens at Cupcake’s presence.

When the supermarket door does not open, Cupcake rams her nose into the door, and she is furious.

So now American men are like the automatic door which no longer opens at Cupcake’s divine presence, and the dearies think we are broke. They are furious.

My heart bleeds.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 102 Thumb down 1
greyghost March 13, 2012 at 08:20

The feminist are delusional if they think we are going back to the old “patriarchy” Remember the old Titanic with the women and children first shit. feminism will not go back it will go forward to fuckyoubitchism when equality is not measured by outcome or how some woman feels but by a measure of responsibility. Resposibilty is terrifying to women.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 56 Thumb down 2
American March 13, 2012 at 08:20

The Academic Gender-Raunch community who “Construct” their Empowerment “Construction”, will not tell the public that its mostly women who call other women sluts.
That sort of information doesn’t sit well with the Gender-Raunch communities Empowerment narative.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 30 Thumb down 33
American March 13, 2012 at 08:22

For every 1 guy i hear the word slut from, i hear the word slut from 10 women. But Again, truth can’t get in the way of the “Empowerment” of American gender-Raunch now can it??

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 31 Thumb down 33
American March 13, 2012 at 08:28

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 38
keyster March 13, 2012 at 08:42

You should see the comments at CNN.com on Sandra Fluke’s Op-ed piece about how “women won’t be silenced”.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/13/opinion/fluke-contraception/index.html?hpt=hp_bn9

It makes the Spearhead look like TGMP.
Is that any of you guys over there?
…I mean there are some angry men (and women) sounding off.
Is Sandra Fluke the “Jump the Shark” moment for Feminism?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 5
Rocco March 13, 2012 at 08:53

All I advocate for is disengement. But MGTOW was specifically singled out as hate.

Really? Henry David Thourough as a hater.

All the men working quietly in their jobs, in universities who only ever wanted a wife a family, but this has now be called hetero-normative and is itself a form of hatred against gay couples.

Advice given by men who have tried the current “system” been so burned as destroyed by the feminist machine shouldn’t say to each other…hey brother…..avoid that meat grinder unless you want to become an indentured servant to a system that alienates you from your children, encourages hatred by wives against husbands for financial gain and encourages mothers to turn children against fathers, parantal alienation syndrome.

Well, in Canada they have laws against free speach if the speach is about subjects the ruling elite, and I mean feminists, don’t like.

Expect that to be the result of this putch by the feminist nationalist fascist machine.

The similarities to Nazi’ism grow more and more each day. Feminism is truley a hate group and just like a husband who is of no use to his wife, the feminists want us to shut up and go away.

Too late….the word is out. Even if this and every site listed went under, 10 more would pop up. Young men see the Feminists Priestess where’s no clothes, and the best place to find her marching for civil rights is at a “Slut Walk”.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 47 Thumb down 2
Master V March 13, 2012 at 08:56

Why so many “dislikes” on American’s comments re law enforcement? Are there law enforcement agents monitoring this site?

Have there always been?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 26 Thumb down 15
American March 13, 2012 at 09:06

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 40
Stoltz March 13, 2012 at 09:13

I’m surprised feminists are still pumping the gender pay gap myth. I was on a sports-related message board a couple months ago and the the topic came up in an off-topic thread. Before I could respond, several other people (read: men) beat me to the punch and blew the poster’s claims clean out of the water. It put a smile on my face knowing other men are seeing past the feminists’ facade.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 74 Thumb down 0
American March 13, 2012 at 09:15

Other nations must understand what happens to a society that lets its law enforcement engage in protocol perversions and semantics games that manufacture faulty and inflamatory statistics.
For example, every violent women who scratches herself in the face, and calls the police, and police use “Protocol perversions and semnatics games” to arrest the innocent male…It manufactures “Perverted statistics”, perverted as in “incorrect”.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 31 Thumb down 24
Steve_85 March 13, 2012 at 09:17

Damn American, you sure know how to stay on message. I don’t think I’ve ever seen you put a message up that didn’t mention Gender-Raunch or men watching games… You could teach most politicians a thing or two about staying on message!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 50 Thumb down 0
Steve_85 March 13, 2012 at 09:25

@Keyster:
The conventional wisdom states that “hell hath no fury like that of a woman scorned” and that “revenge is a dish best served cold”

I disagree. Woman hath no fury like the righteous rage of a man who realizes he’s been lied to his whole life. I also think revenge is best served white hot.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 52 Thumb down 1
keyster March 13, 2012 at 09:27

“The similarities to Nazi’ism grow more and more each day.”

Dr. Joseph Goebbels, head of Germany’s Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda.

Gloria Steimen, Robin Morgan and Jane Fonda, founders of the Women’s Media Center. Only instead of promoting White Nationalism and hatred of Jews, Feminists promote Female Supremacy, hatred of men and boys and dissolution of the “traditional” family.

They, along with NOW and the Feminist Majority, are charitable organizations (that don’t pay taxes), whose objective is to censor speech that criticizes feminism and women as a group or as individuals (who are Secular-Progressive only).

No such group(s) existed for men and boys en force, until now.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 5
Jim March 13, 2012 at 09:34

I wonder why the huffington post is not listed as a hate site?

And when I saw the picture of kelly I thought it was a guy.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 1
keyster March 13, 2012 at 09:35

“Damn American, you sure know how to stay on message. I don’t think I’ve ever seen you put a message up that didn’t mention Gender-Raunch or men watching games…”

He pulled the same shit over at AVfM last year as “Elvis” and a couple of other monikers until Elam finally blocked his IP address after several warnings. Welmer is a patient man.

His ad nauseum rhetoric reveals either stupidity, mental instability or the desire to disrupt MRA blogs.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 47 Thumb down 8
sharp March 13, 2012 at 09:45

I occasionally babysit a 2 year-old boy for a female family member. I change diapers. I have no kids of my own so at first it wasn’t easy to change a shit diaper. Some loads stink to holy hell, to the point where I was dry heaving. When women first change diapers it’s just as difficult for them. But after a few times I got used to the whole process and am now like an old pro. It’s not a big deal. Sure, I don’t like doing it, most women seem to mind it less, babysitting is obviously easier than parenting, but it isn’t that difficult and most men don’t have a problem. I know how to solve a Rubik’s Cube in a little over a minute (I just did it before I wrote this post), I can change a stinking diaper.

Oh, it’s supposed to be funny.The “men are bumbling idiots” theme wasn’t funny the first million times I saw it in a commercial. It’s not going to be funny the next million. The people who make these advertisements are creatively bankrupt.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 1
andybob March 13, 2012 at 09:55

“No, she’s scared because she feels the initiative slipping away. She can see the pedestal tottering and about to topple over.” Mr Price

Men have been bridling beneath the matriarchal yoke for some time, but the Kelly Cogswells of the world have been too busy with their snouts in the trough of feminist entitlement to notice.

What’s changed?

Take a good look at Ms Cogswell’s photo and tell me if she isn’t the most dismal streak of misery you’ve seen in a long time. The grisled countenance, the tortured posture, the botched DIY hair cut – she reeks of sad, lonely cat lady. She may dress like a 10 year-old boy, but she’s a joyless feminist to the bone.

I have begun to notice vast numbers of women just like her. Women who hitched their ponies to the Feminist Gravy Train, only to find that it took them far from anywhere that could have given their lives any real meaning and fulfilment. They are displaced persons. Their time has passed and they have nothing to show for it but stale anger and despair. Bleak prospects await.

These women are starting to question why their lives went so wrong. Unfortunately, they are coming up with all the wrong answers.

It would make no difference if the pedestal that Mr Price refers to toppled over completely and broke Ms Cogswell’s scrawny neck. She’d find a way to continue squawking about the evils of patriarchy. Despite what feminism has done to them, women like her will cling their lies and delusions to the bitter end. They are all they have left.

So, this is supposed to be feminist comedy, is it? My sides failed to split – what a surprise.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 105 Thumb down 1
jaego March 13, 2012 at 10:03

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 56
Rocco March 13, 2012 at 10:14

If my only friend is someone who hates black or brown people I would rather have no friends just as if the only women I can have a relationship with hate men, I’d rather be MGTOW.

IMO.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 46 Thumb down 13
Uncle Elmer March 13, 2012 at 10:18

ForbesWoman agrees with the Spearhead Men, and cites “a study that shows” men accentuate the positive and women accentuate the negative!

What Does A Happy Marriage Make? Men and Women Tell A Different Story

http://www.forbes.com/sites/alicegwalton/2012/03/13/what-does-a-happy-marriage-make-men-and-women-tell-a-different-story/

“…But the story was different for women: Their relationship satisfaction had more to do with how negative feelings were perceived. For instance, wives who intuited their husband’s unhappy emotions were more likely to be satisfied in their relationship than women who correctly gauged their partner’s happy emotions. Even more interesting was the fact that when men were able to pick up on their wives’ negative feelings, their wives were more likely to report marriage satisfaction – but the men themselves were not. In other words, women were more satisfied when their men “felt their pain” and when they felt their husband’s pain.”

Elmer is excited about these findings :

elmer Just posted

The message coming from men is quite clear : A Man Wants a Wife, Not a Co-Worker.

And, incredibly, the comments on this thread mirror your exact observation that men are satisfied with the positive and women are satisfied with the negative :

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/03/06/what-do-men-want-in-a-wife-and-why-wont-wives-oblige/

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer March 13, 2012 at 10:19

je suis 37 minutes ago

Have you seen Missrepresentation? It’s a Sundance movie. Every woman should see it. Every man with daughters, a wife, sister or female in his life should see it.

elmer Just posted

It’s a great film by women about how women conspire to exploit women through media imagery depicting women trying to look hotter than other women. Men should watch it because they generally ignore women-centric media and advertising. It will give them a clue just how vicious women are towards women.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 2
Uncle Elmer March 13, 2012 at 10:23

Master V March 13, 2012 at 08:56

Why so many “dislikes” on American’s comments re law enforcement? Are there law enforcement agents monitoring this site?

———————————-

No, it’s his abuse of the term “Gender-Raunch”, similar to my fixation on “rogure”, which I carried on with abandon until the guys finally had enough and took me out back and for a blanket-party. The “downvotes” are a polite way of leaving a bottle of mouthwash on his desk.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 0
keyster March 13, 2012 at 10:30

“However just like the Tea Party, the majority of MRAs believe that hordes of Blacks are going to join us in droves anyday now.”

No one believes that.
But if “hordes of Blacks” were to spontaneously join us, they’d be more than welcome to. As a matter of fact, I’d settle for a horde of anybody to join this nascent online “Men’s Movement” of a few hundred people spread around the globe.

I’d look at co-opting human rights groups, but their socio-political agenda doesn’t seem to be a good fit. The Animal Rights Movement is in order of magnitude larger than the MRM could ever hope for; in case you need some perspective on where men and boys rank in our society today.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 3
Iano March 13, 2012 at 10:36

@Stolz

That is because accurate patriarchical numbers are used. When you use non-male numbers to express feelings you can see the gender gap in wages.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
Steve_85 March 13, 2012 at 10:58

The enemy of my enemy may be no friend of mine.

Blacks get a bit of protection by playing the racial card, but feminists don’t care if you’re black, white or green; if you are male they want you dead or enslaved if the blacks were clever they’d join us.

Like Keyster I don’t expect large numbers of blacks to join us, but if they wanted to, I would welcome them warmly.

The enemy of my enemy may be no friend of mine; but he might just be the best friend I haven’t met yet and he will get the benefit of the doubt from me.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 4
AfOR March 13, 2012 at 11:12

@ Keyster re American

He is a False Rape Accusation victim.

He earned the right to stick to his one message.

You’re the new recruit in boot camp dissing the disabled vet.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 20 Thumb down 23
American March 13, 2012 at 11:29

Keyster…Disrupt mens rights??? I guess that would revolve around what you’re definition of mens rights is???
Some guys are here for multitudes of reasons, many i might not agree with, but my main goal as a mens rights activist is to stop the perversions in American law enforcement that are enableing violent women, and persecuting innocent people. (men are people).

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 30 Thumb down 22
Towgunner March 13, 2012 at 11:34

We are certainly nearing the nadir of femosupremacy as austerity looms they’ll start to lose funding. This cretin’s “life work” is analogous to feminism as a whole. Since feminism is born out of social engineering, its best to call it a “trend”. cogswell wakes up everyday blaming other people (men). In reality, she’s still a she and in her world that isn’t “he” enough, so, she hates herself. Worse, like all other feminists, she projects what she hates most about herself onto others. The result is typical for feminists and for the left, a “movement” that moves to nowhere. Unless she renounces her “life’s work” she’ll die a very mean person, unfulfilled and still hating others. That usually makes people lonely too. Other people, mostly men oddly, have led truly productive lives that had real meaning such as inventors, artists, engineers, designers etc. Their ‘work’ helps everyone out, not just women. cogswell’s “work” helps only some people out and at the expense of others…and it’s all intentional. feminism is a road to nowhere, it doesn’t exist outside of a nanny-state. When feminism isn’t running in circles it hits solid walls of contradiction but other than reconciling with this…these walls are just ignored. As such, feminism just stops making any sense. This correction is long over-due…cogswell’s life work is a trend that hates certain people. The only ‘accomplishment’ here is that a hate movement came about during the most PC period in all of American history.
It’s pretty clear that we need to keep the pressure on. Keep writing.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 5
Alexandra March 13, 2012 at 11:40

Changing diapers takes a little bit of practice. Sure, I changed like 99% of my son’s diapers, but I hardly thought my husband was incompetent. I mean, once you figure out what end of the baby the diaper goes on, it’s a snap. LOL

(With feminists, I’d put diapers on both ends to be on the safe side.)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 6
Rocco March 13, 2012 at 11:43

I guess when women come into power they don’t like being treated equally and becoming the subjects of satire.

For instance:

Does Ms. Cogwell of the documentary on the “Lesbian Avengers”? (Gender-Raunch Man has yet another supervillian to engage)…

http://www.lesbianavengers.com/

…..in her role reversal does she also want men to stay at home all day while their wives work?

Here we see a statistic that 45% of of women with children stay at home. Do we get the house and bank account too when we divorce?

http://smartmomma.com/work_career/can't_we_get_along.htm

And can we then move in with a woman with a job yet still collect child support from mommy all the while we make sure that our little meal ticket thinks mom is dangerous and violent?

Then find a younger model and move out on #2 and collect from both?

That was satire.

For the feminst thought police reading this.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 2
Migu March 13, 2012 at 11:48

American,

Seriously here, I can’t read your posts anymore. It is because of the term gender-raunch. I know what it is. So does everyone else who visits daily.

Try this out…..

An apple tart is a delicious treat. The apple tart is however dangerous to your health. The apple tart will clog your arteries, and the apple tart will also spike your blood sugar. The apple tart is a delectable culinary creation. The apple tart can make you happy, but in the end the apple tart will actually bring you to an early grave. The apple tart is in fact a delusion. The apple tart……

Sick of reading apple tart yet?

Same thing with gender-raunch, or rape-culture, or pay-gap, you get the idea right?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 2
Aservant March 13, 2012 at 11:49

@ Keyster

I checked out your link to the article but I didn’t get any comments on the op ed I saw………where are they? I checked out a facebook link through the 0p ed, but there were only 7 comments……albeit all of them were anti-feminist. Is it possible they shut the comments down? I wouldn’t be suprised in the least if that is the case.

@ Steve 85

Your reply to American about staying on topic was priceless…….I just about fuckin choked on spontaneous laughter……

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 5
nugganu March 13, 2012 at 12:15

This bitch reminds my of my high school girlfriend from the early 90′s. She guzzled the feminist kool-aid and has now morphed into a sour, 250 lb. warpig lesbian feminist who’s so fat even her eyelids are fat. Feminism makes women ugly on the outside as well as on the inside, to think, when I dated her all those years ago, she used to be a solid 8 out of 10. Now I cannot even give her a 1 out of 10. Gross fat lesbian, I need to go out and by some wood filler to get that notch out of my bedpost.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 47 Thumb down 1
Thomas Tell-Truth March 13, 2012 at 12:38

Every empire reaches a point where it can no longer rely on its prestige to promote its hegemony. At this point it switches to naked force. Feminism is reaching this point. When the MRM was a small group of men prattling on about things like alimony reform and male disposability could be tolerated as harmless nuts. But now the MRM is growing, and its issues loom on the horizon of public awareness. The Empire is losing its moral authority, and so now it will switch to naked force. Expect hate crime trials, arrests, shaming, bannings, seizures, increasingly shrill editorials and a growing number of negative portrayals of MRAs and MGTOW in popular media as the Empire tries to stamp out the rebels. It will get much, much worse as the MRM continues to make inroads.

But it is all just the drawing back of water before the incoming deluge of men’s rights. In 50 years our issues will be enshrined in law, and future generations will wonder about all the fuss.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 0
Poester99 March 13, 2012 at 12:57

What’s up with the picture of the skinny guy?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 0
keyster March 13, 2012 at 13:01

“…but my main goal as a mens rights activist is to stop the perversions in American law enforcement that are enableing violent women, and persecuting innocent people. (men are people).”

We know, we know!
It’s not you or your beliefs, (so stop playing the oppressed victim card).
It’s your irritating and tedious repetition in post after post.
As if you’re a disc jockey that can only play one record.
Imagine listening to “Louie Louie” throught your day, every day.
Now you know what we’re talking about.

If you have nothing else to contribute, besides:
“Gender raunch is causing gender raunch American law enforcement perversions to discriminate against men in a perverted gender raunch justice system that prosecutes men in the gender raunch perverted courts”…etc. and so on…then please mercifully spare us…YOU’VE MADE YOUR POINT! AND I FUCKING AGREE WITH YOU!

So replace that little tape loop in your head with something original for a change, or just sit back and listen and learn.

Again, Welmer has a lot more patience…not sure how much more.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 4
Rebel March 13, 2012 at 13:04

The heat is on. The gauntlet has been cast.

Now the real fight begins.

Our message must be loud and clear:

. . . . “WE AIN’T GONNA TAKE THIS ANYMORE!”.

And if there are some who don’t like it, TOUGH SHIT!!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
TFH March 13, 2012 at 13:06

This is why the feminists are showing their ugly side these recent days. Expect it to get even uglier soon.

Doubling down.

Expect the mangina doubling down to happen even more, and go to ‘you can’t make this up’ levels of absurdity.

Post flyers! Too few guys have gotten up and posted flyers, even though this drives the misandrists nuts and exposes more normal men to the red pill.

Remember, the other 99% of men do not spend tons of time on the Internet. They are too busy providing for ungrateful wives in soul-crushing jobs. But they will still see a flyer posted above a urinal….. which will make them think.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 3
PeterTheGreat March 13, 2012 at 13:08

Kelly Cogswell is soooooooo yesterday!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Boxer March 13, 2012 at 13:09

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 43
TFH March 13, 2012 at 13:11

Uncle Elmer is awesome. He singlehandedly ties down that entire ForbesWoman gaggle.

Asymmetrical warfare.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 2
Opus March 13, 2012 at 13:11

Off Topic

I have just learned that Tom Martin, the guy who quit his Gender Studies course at the LSE and who then sued them, has had the case struck out. I am not sure whether he means that – as it is a technical legal term, which only people such as myself are entitled to understand ;) – or whether he means he has lost on the evidence. I, of course, predicted he would lose, and so you will all note my legal acumen in these matters. He is now considering whether he would be right to appeal (or perhaps he meant whether he has a right to appeal).

I suspect that losing is ultimately going to have better repurcussions for the MRM than a win would do, as its bad PR for the LSE and academia generally, so its a win/win situation really.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 1
Boxer March 13, 2012 at 13:12

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 35
Boxer March 13, 2012 at 13:17

So, a hideously ugly bull dyke slams men on the Huffington Post… Is this all these feminist cunts have, exactly? A whole lotta hot air and nothing else?

What has all that tax money gone for, exactly? With the trillions and trillions squandered on empowerment and lesbian studies, I’d expect them to have a ray gun, deployed from space, to instantly castrate all the men on planet earth, or something similar. If they’d given that money to men, we’d probably be colonizing Ganymede by now. Jeyzus.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 8
Andrew S. March 13, 2012 at 13:18

Andybob, that was a great post. I see it in my aunts as well. Diehard feminists who are going down with ship, even though they have no prospects and are absolutely miserable. I still believe feminism will continue to be a popular choice for the majority of attractive women in this country, as this will give them the best chance at “having it all,” whatever that means.

But for unattractive women like Kelly Cogswell, as well as most average looking women, the choice of feminism will cause them nothing but sadness down the line.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 0
keyster March 13, 2012 at 13:18

“@ Keyster
I checked out your link to the article but I didn’t get any comments on the op ed I saw………where are they?”

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/13/opinion/fluke-contraception/index.html?hpt=hp_c1

You might need to sign up for a CNN account to see them.
Man-o-man most of the comments are refreshing to see.
I don’t know who all these people are, but the whole “war on women” strategy is back firing badly, even among reasonable Democrats.

Sandra Fluke’s TV appearances:

• Ed Schultz’s show Thursday March 1

• Today Show Friday March 2

• Andrea Mitchell’s show Friday, March 2

• CBS News Friday, March 2

• CNN—Dana Bash interview March 2

• Hardball- MSNBC March 2

• “The View” March 5

…gets a call from the President of the United States…
…signs with a DC PR agency…

….and THEN writes an op-ed piece on CNN.com that says she “won’t be silenced”. You can’t make this crap up.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 2
piercedhead March 13, 2012 at 13:21

Men standing up for themselves was inevitable as soon as women started making themselves unattractive for marriage with the ridiculous marital laws they promoted.

Feminists would have got nowhere without men either supporting or indulging them – and most of these men did this out of loyalty to, or fear of, their wives.

So guess what happens when men stop marrying, and start believing that they never will marry?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 51 Thumb down 0
keyster March 13, 2012 at 13:27

“In other words: Shut up, Keyster kook, nobody gave you permission to speak.”

I’ve missed your Alinski-esque personal insults and Critical Theorist dismissive invenctive. How’ve you been anyway?

You obsess over my comments in your personal blog?
I’m not sure whether to be flattered or a little creeped out.
(FYI – She chased me.)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 4
Simon March 13, 2012 at 14:26

As for “hordes of blacks” joining. I doubt that will happen. A few of us are here and ready to join. We will catch hell as sell-outs and we know it. But right is right.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 3
James March 13, 2012 at 15:05

Yes, I have seen a HUGE INCREASE in men writing anti-feminist comments on news articles and other online blogs and message places, so anti-feminism is definitely increasing very rapidly.

The women are freaking out now and losing their minds, literally, because they know that the reaction to all of the man hating feminism they have spewed for the past 50 years is going to get VERY UGLY.

Murders of women by their husbands or boyfriends is rising DRAMATICALLY. Men are finally getting fucking fed up and refuse to tolerate this abuse from women anymore. Unfortunately, some of them snap and kill women, but then again, how can we blame them? These same vicious women are trying to kidnap the man’s children from them and forbid contact through custody battles.

These women have NO ONE TO BLAME BUT THEMSELVES!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 8
Pops March 13, 2012 at 15:07

Simon, black men are ripe for joining which is precisely why there are so many voices in MRA willing to spout white nationalism. Republicans know that they can repeatedly express welcoming blacks because they know that black perception against the Republican Party is so strong. But when you look at the far more intense gender war in the black community and the way that the men of Black Men Vent and Tired Black Man express the same disgust with feminism and the modern woman, it is clear that black men are very prone to getting involved with MRA. And this is where the problem lies.

White nationalists are looking for something to latch on to and the presence of blacks will undermine that. So they seek to make an unwelcoming environment and there seems to be those who wish to work to keep this a white men’s movement; something that will handicap MRA if allowed to happen. Gender issues are secondary for white nationalists and they really don’t care if MRA fails as long as they get a platform to spout their racial dogma.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 10
Anonymous March 13, 2012 at 16:58

Hey Gents:

Just responding to some of the posts above regarding black men. We’re all in this together. We need black men in this movement because we need men. And Black men are a fu*king awesome group of people, so we need them. I don’t care who you are, especially what race, when I see other men neutered by a vindictive and evil culture I can relate. And I want to help. I guess there may be some white supremacist here or in the MRA…they need to know that everyone is being emasculated. And this will never change until us men…all of us…take this whole thing back. Hopefully, we’ll learn from it and I think we will as a sex and as a species. If we remain divided the numbers will never work, and its real simple. The explanations of why feminism is so powerful are easy to see once you realize that all women vote as a block…for the most part. That’s 1/2 the population. White women, black women, Latino…they share a hatred for men and it unites them. As such women have voted in their dominance. Seriously, look at the facts…women say things like “I want – blank i.e. sports or handouts or no slut or investment banking or harvard or…you get the point. And so they go vote it in. Its not because they’re better or “superior”…or a different “species”. Its mob rule. We can’t compete because we don’t have the same number of votes. Ergo, we need to change that like yesterday. Every man is your brother.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 4
Boxer March 13, 2012 at 17:01

Gender issues are secondary for white nationalists and they really don’t care if MRA fails as long as they get a platform to spout their racial dogma.

It goes further than this. Misandry is at the heart of modern, organized White racism.

It’s at the heart of modern, organized Black racism too. Look at the pedestalization that goes on in the Nation of Islam, for example. It’s scarcely any more glossed over than at the National Organization for Women.

In any event, the phenomenon can be clearly seen here from time to time. One thing I remember was the Rayon McIntosh incident. (http://www.dnainfo.com/20111203/greenwich-village-soho/mcdonalds-beating-cook-rayon-mcintosh-elated-be-free). Almost from the moment it was discussed, there were people here jumping cartwheels in an attempt to demonize the dude as “just another negro, doing what those damned negroes do”. In fact, he was minding his own business, retreated when attacked, and used minimal force to subdue his two nasty female assailants. It was quite an eye opener to see the rationalization hamsters at work in the minds of the White Nationalist crowd on this forum, supposedly dedicated to equality for men.

This is ultimately what racism is about: a glorification of your races women as “the bearers of the next generation of precious (White, Black, Asian, Whatever) children, and a division of one man from his brother based upon arbitrary data like skin color and hair coarseness.

Our enemies run circles around us, laughing, while we fight our brothers. It’s not a very coherent picture we paint when we stoop to such stuff.

Boxer

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 10
Attila March 13, 2012 at 17:02

It doesn’t take much to be banned at the HuffPo —- the site is an echo-chamber for all kinds of lumpen-liberaliat — a veritable Petri dish of unhealthy bacteria and other leftist fungi.

I once got banned for making a comment about how unhappy Dick Cheney’s lesbian daughter looked in the company of her consort in a pic.

The site’s is overwhelmingly gay, feminist, and Jewish.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 9
td9red March 13, 2012 at 17:04

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 41
td9red March 13, 2012 at 17:56

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 40
Pops March 13, 2012 at 17:58

This is ultimately what racism is about: a glorification of your races women as “the bearers of the next generation of precious (White, Black, Asian, Whatever) children, and a division of one man from his brother based upon arbitrary data like skin color and hair coarseness.

You hit it on the nail Boxer. Those groups will and do pedestalize the women of their particular group and I see that when lurking on their sites. They come here spouting men’s rights and then go back to their sites and discuss how their women are so angelic. They can’t be trusted.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 7
Auntie Pheminizm March 13, 2012 at 19:39

Cogswell looks like a young John Malkovich.

I, too, found the “gender-raunch” term tiresome. There must be other ways to describe what’s meant. Something about that word combo grates. Plus what does it mean? Is it like “gender-velocity”?

Guys need to…

(1) stop talking and thinking that it will take 10-20-30 more years for the men’s movement to grow. Such thinking assures it will take a century.

(2) keep hitting back hard against feminists. The women’s movement has never faced concerted counter-attacks. They will fold, like all bullies do, very quickly once we start fighting back.

Heretofore the men’s movement was like General McClellan’s army during the American Civil War. He built up troops, trained them, obtained supplies, etc. The one thing he would NOT do was fight. One time he “started” to start, but then immediately stopped. Why? He saw the enemy’s massed cannon.

Only the “cannon” were painted logs.

On the other hand, once General Grant took over and began fighting, HE never stopped. No amount of difficult terrain (“the Wilderness”) or enemy fire stopped him.

We need to emulate him . We’ve been patient long enough. Our wishing to avoid conflict was mistaken for cowardice. Our aversion to fighting females who attack us was used against us. And now? Too much shite has gone on for too long. Men are fed up.

Much that once held meaning for us (work, family, children, college, etc.) has not only been taken from us, we’re mocked for wanting it.

Feminists see us as subhuman. They care not a jot that MALE blood, sweat, and tears lets them live pampered lives. They take safety and prosperity for granted. Meanwhile, men are much maligned and endlessly taken for granted. The center cannot hold.

Economic downturns will free men to ask profound questions. Like…

“What’s in it for me to keep lifting bales and toting barges?”

“Why should I get married and have kids if, ultimately, I’m just my wife’s slave?” And

“Why should I sacrifice myself on society’s altar when all that’s meaningful has been taken from me?”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 1
Leone March 13, 2012 at 20:23

“feminists are showing their ugly side these recent days”

Uh, which side would that be?? The one thing you can say about Kelly Cogswell is that she isn’t two-faced. Because if she was, she’d probably wear the other one!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
tiredofitall March 13, 2012 at 20:36

Not to pile on, but re: Ms. Cogswell’s picture. My reaction was the same as the Lorax, “That’s a woman??”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
Nemo March 13, 2012 at 20:41

Black men have even greater incentives to become MRAs than white guys.

Statistically, the “average” adult non-black guy is mad because feminism means that he can’t have a wife and children like his father did.

Statistically, the “average” adult black guy guy is mad because feminism means that he can’t have a wife and children *and* that he never was allowed to have his father fully active in his life either.

Theree are obviously black guys with married parents and white/Asian/Hispanic guys with never-married or divorced parents, but odds are that a randomly chosen young black guy’s parents were not married and a randomly chosen young non-black guy’s parents were married.

Black guys are about one generation “ahead” of the rest of the USA in suffering the evils of feminism. The illegitimacy rate among blacks is now about 70%. The other groups are “catching up” quickly, but blacks are the first ethnic group to get a full generation of men raised primarily with no father in the house.

The results are apparent, and devastating.

If anything, black guys should be treated as prophets who can warn the rest of us that they have seen the evils of feminism first hand and that if we take the wrong path, then the entire nation is doomed.

For the record, if any other ethnic group allows marriage to decay to the point that 70% of births are out of wedlock, then they would suffer a series of woes similar to what black guys are going through right now.

This white nationalism nonsense is a bunch of off-topic hooey, and it’s very counter productive.

I wonder if we have agents provocateurs intentionally posting that crap here just so that they can smear the rest of the site’s content as “hate speech”.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 3
TFH March 13, 2012 at 20:49

“The Animal Rights Movement is in order of magnitude larger than the MRM could ever hope for; in case you need some perspective on where men and boys rank in our society today.”

This is because there is no animal-rights equivalent of ‘manginas’.

Focus on the real root cause about why misandry is THE most unopposed evil around…

Manginas are most of the problem.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 1
T March 13, 2012 at 21:01

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 34
tbc March 13, 2012 at 21:01

As one of the few Black guys here, I’m glad to say I’m on board.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 57 Thumb down 1
nugganu March 13, 2012 at 21:07

No offence but why is ALWAYS the Yanks who have to bring race into everything? You do realise that in most of the other countries in the West and the Commonwealth these issues, well, they aren’t as pronounced? MRM isn’t about race.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 6
Matt Strictland March 13, 2012 at 21:10

Rocco, the reason MGTOW gets singled out is its far scarier than outright anger.

Anger is easy to deal with but no one can stop a revolution of NO! There is no leadership to decapitate, no resistance to overpower and no idea to stamp out.

And yeah sure we could try levying special taxes or passing laws, Ancient Rome tried and failed and even the totalitarian wannabe states of today don’t have the manpower (or is it mangina power) or the ability.

Once MGTOW sets in, its an endgame.

Thats what scares them most . Once enough men drop out, the economy shrinks. the mens work goes undone (women are not going to enjoy being responsible for the infrastructure and policing ) , the population drops, decent men stop having sex (c.f Japan) so women can’t find partners as easily . There need for sex goes unmet as much . In that scenario women get nothing but a much greater work load and less safety., well OK maybe more cats too.

Men won’t be as happy as they’d like (many men would really like a good wife and kids and a family ) but they’ll be far better off than the women and while both parties and society whatever that is loses, men lose a lot less.

And while the SPLC want to call it hate speech, its moot at this point. Common sense and word of mouth can’t be muted. When one guy says “I am not bothering with a relationship” to his friends, everybody gets the idea. MGTOW benefits from the MRM but it doesn’t need it and as such it can’t be easily shut down. Its viral now.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 1
jaego March 13, 2012 at 23:53

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 37
piercedhead March 14, 2012 at 00:13

“No offence but why is ALWAYS the Yanks who have to bring race into everything? You do realise that in most of the other countries in the West and the Commonwealth these issues, well, they aren’t as pronounced? MRM isn’t about race.”-nugganu

It’s not a white thing nugganu – it’s a history thing belonging to a small American subsection. I’m not American, but I am white, and in my 50+ years I’ve never heard other white people talking in this way. I can’t believe what I’m reading most of the time.

The nearest thing I can relate it to is the significance some Northern Irish people attach to what church they belong to – it’s a life and death tribal thing – whereas in most of the rest of the world no-one gives a hoot. You have to be there to believe it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 6
All2Keen March 14, 2012 at 01:23

@jaego

You are wrong about Nationalist/Nazis. There have been two attempts this week by Nazis to get the Nationalist Movement to ally itself with the MRM. They are not buying it. They seem to fall in the pro-fem white knight camp. Thankfully they do not want to have anything to do with the MRM and I am glad. the MRM is about men, all men, gay and straight, white and black, and indian, and asian, just men.

These attempts to get the two separate movements to work together is in my opinion the work of either the mentally disturbed or, and I know this is bordering tin-foil hat territory, a false-flag operation meant to discredit the MRM with guilt by association tactics. So some Femi can jump up and say “look, look everybody, they are working together with the Nazis.” which is complete horse$hit and anyone with half a brain knows it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2
All2Keen March 14, 2012 at 01:27

I think these comments have been infiltated by femi-sycophants/trolls pushing a MRM discrediting operation. The Femis must be really upset. Don’t buy their crap.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
The Caliph March 14, 2012 at 02:46

Since we are at it.

I’m The Caliph, not just a Black guy but African too, been here since week one of The-Spearhead.

For the record i openly vex feminism and misandry and play my race card, White guys are typically pleasantly surprised. I get to say what they can’t say and get away with it.

I can honestly tell you the race card doesn’t carry the same parity as the gender card. But boy do i throw that shit around and piss off manginas and bitches alike.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 0
Pops March 14, 2012 at 06:33

Jaego claims:
“Once Affirmative Action falls, the Black Middle Class is gone like dew under the hot sun.”

This is from an article written by Larry Elder:

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=22806

In their book, America in Black and White, Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom show that the black middle class existed and grew well before affirmative action.

Moreover, they point out that affirmative action did not accelerate the growth of the black middle class.

And economist Thomas Sowell recently wrote, “Yet the rapid growth of that [black] middle class began even before the civil-rights revolution of the 1960s, much less the racial quotas and preferences that began in the 1970s.

“The rise of blacks into professional and similar occupations was faster in the five years preceding passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than in the five years following its passage.”

And take note of this part of his article:

Bond is, quite simply, wrong. But this blind belief—no affirmative action, no black middle class—dominates contemporary thinking among “black leaders” and many other liberals. This mistaken view explains the almost pathological defense of big government and the indifference toward the unfair middle-class tax burden. After all, but for government’s benevolence, where would blacks be?

It’s interesting that you share a common mistaken belief with modern black “leaders” and big government liberals.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
Pops March 14, 2012 at 06:38

Jaego claims:
“Once Affirmative Action falls, the Black Middle Class is gone like dew under the hot sun.”

This is from an article written by Larry Elder:

http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=22806

In their book, America in Black and White, Stephan and Abigail Thernstrom show that the black middle class existed and grew well before affirmative action.

Moreover, they point out that affirmative action did not accelerate the growth of the black middle class.

And economist Thomas Sowell recently wrote, “Yet the rapid growth of that [black] middle class began even before the civil-rights revolution of the 1960s, much less the racial quotas and preferences that began in the 1970s.

“The rise of blacks into professional and similar occupations was faster in the five years preceding passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than in the five years following its passage.”

And take note of this part of his article:

Bond is, quite simply, wrong. But this blind belief—no affirmative action, no black middle class—dominates contemporary thinking among “black leaders” and many other liberals. This mistaken view explains the almost pathological defense of big government and the indifference toward the unfair middle-class tax burden. After all, but for government’s benevolence, where would blacks be?

It’s interesting that you share a common mistaken belief with modern black “leaders” and big government liberals.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2
freebird March 14, 2012 at 07:03

I love ya American, but also agree you’ve got to switch up your wording.
Even my eyes glaze over at the phrase now. Here’s how it works:
1:At the top,8-12 Presidential Cabinets for women,run by lesbian man haters who then “vote” funding to womens shelters and other sexual grievance industries.
2.Those shelters give out free legal aid, forcing men to PAY the system.
3.States PAY matching dollars with the Federal funding to this system.(earnings)
4.Judges have been documented diverting these funds into personal accounts-that’s how much money there is in it.
5.”friends of the court-Collect $$$
6.CPS and other “agencies-collect $$$
7.Federal funding to Police depts to carry out VAWA pescripts.
8.Hence the fudging of numbers and sex of violators to get more $$$ for police and courts.
IT PAYS THE BEST IN TOWN<AND THERE IS NO RECOURSE-fail to pay=go to jail.

WHAT A BUSINESS!

There ya go my friend, put a little zazz in yur speech.

"Your money or your freedom"

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
meistergedanken March 14, 2012 at 07:27

Piercedhead wrote:
“It’s not a white thing nugganu – it’s a history thing belonging to a small American subsection….The nearest thing I can relate it to is the significance some Northern Irish people attach to what church they belong to – it’s a life and death tribal thing – whereas in most of the rest of the world no-one gives a hoot. You have to be there to believe it.”

Yeah, you DO have to be there – like my parents and grandparents were. They were driven out of Cleveland in the 60′s and 70′s by the blacks, as were the parents of most of my friends in the the white-flight suburb I grew up in. Being forced to give up your home for peanuts (or daily face the constant threat of theft and murder) will leave an unpleasant aftertaste.

It’s not easy to walk that “fine line” – the foreigners insist we are always obsessing about race and “bringing it up all the time”, while our current crop of black leaders (like Att. Gen. Eric “My People” Holder) say we are cowards for not talking about race enough, and that we “need to have open and honest conversations” about it. No one really seems to want the honesty, though….

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 5
Migu March 14, 2012 at 07:51

No offence but why is ALWAYS the Yanks who have to bring race into everything? You do realise that in most of the other countries in the West and the Commonwealth these issues, well, they aren’t as pronounced? MRM isn’t about race.

It was, and still is taught in our public indoctrination centers.

You don’t get out of primary or secondary school without a thorough understanding of racism. The only difference these days is at the end of the lecture the teacher says “We aren’t like that now.” (In white schools with a few token minorities anyway.)

Really teach? Then why did I just spend the entire year learning all the reasons black people are inferior. Oh right so you can tell me how wrong it is.

My question, why in the hell do you teach something that is wrong in the first place?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
Migu March 14, 2012 at 07:59

Once MGTOW sets in, its an endgame.

Team B (Republicans) Understand this intuitively.

Team A (Democrats) Understand this intuitively.

Team B wants delightful servants

Team A wants suborned slaves.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
Boxer March 14, 2012 at 08:09

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 25
Anonymous March 14, 2012 at 08:58

Responding to Jaego:

Ah, I’m here because I’m a second maybe third class citizen, if I’m even that any longer. Being in the Marines and in war, I take extreme issue with this fact since I basically defended a system that thinks I’m inferior. This is all men, period. Assuming you’re a man, all the above includes you too. FYI this is Towgunner, I’m remote right now. While we fought with each other over petty differences, social engineers and feminists swooped right in under our noses and emasculated all of us. Now look at what we are. Someone above made reference to PETA, it got me to think that men have less advocacy than animals do! Of course, I’m for small government and no advocacy in the PETA or now or lgbt kind of way, natural law works just fine. But that should still be a chilling realization to all of us nonetheless. Again, animals have more advocacy then men in today’s open, tolerant and compassionate society. So, were less than dogs. Got it? How about putting aside our stupid prejudices and focus on the real problem at hand. The welfare state and feminism crushed Black men; we’ll be wise to start there.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 0
Firepower March 14, 2012 at 10:36

Boxer

P.S.: For the new guys here

Winning points with no0bs – yeah, that’s what makes you right!

With “logic” like that, it’s hard to argue against the Validity of Popularity Contests.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 17
Boxer March 14, 2012 at 12:12

Hi Poodles! So glad to see you’re back to dance for the amusement of your elders and betters. Nice to know the pedophile brigade has your support, too. LOLOLOL!

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 22
American March 14, 2012 at 13:35

Freebird, Thank you sir for saying what needs to be said. reading yer list, it clearly shows you have an un-obstructed understanding of the perverse pork bloating that many in the legal community are now feeding on, (As long as innocent people can still be fed into the manufactured statistics machine, theres pork bloating for all).
And yes, i will control the usage of the term “Gender-Raunch community”, and use it sparingly.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 7
Art Vandelay March 14, 2012 at 14:03

If I were in the baby business (diapers, food) and needed to find a niche for market share I would bash men and portray them as useless idiots as well. It’s good business sense to appeal to women who convinced themselves that they don’t need a man. Because giving birth and being a single mom IS THE MOST DIFFICULT JOB ON THE PLANET. Well at least that’s what I’d make my customers think.

This Bill Burr bit comes to mind: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwPg2oarG_c

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2
MaMu1977 March 14, 2012 at 14:15

1. Seeing as how over 50% of all affirmative action jobs are given to middle-class white women and another 20-30% are given to minority women, it’s the rare non-white *and* non politically connected American man who supports AA.

2. When no-fault divorce and “benevolent welfare” (as in housing and free money for unwed mothers, etc.), hit the black community, black men soon became superfluous. Once “our” women were given the opportunity to do as they saw fit (with gov’t approval), we saw the writing on the wall and backed off. As in modern times, there were literally 3 good, decent, “*boring*” men cast away for every asshole (with most of those decent men standing aside and watching their exes commiserating with the *loyal* wives and GFs of the aforementioned assholes.)

Bottom line, African-American men are hard sells for MRA admission for one simple reason: our “Alphas” (whether legitimate or thugs) benefit from the current conditions. Both classifications have their choice of women (thugs consume every piece of low hanging fruit, our “talented Tenth” pick and choose from the women who rise above, and both classes have their way with the women in the middle.) When the vast majority of black women began chasing Tough Tony and/or Pretty Ricky (if you think that white middle class women are feminism-positive, you’d soil yourself at the influence on feminism in the black community), the rest of us pulled on our big boy drawers and “went our own way.” Between the military, work-based relocation and “going ghost”/subsistence living, almost every non-alpha black male in America has ceded our culture to the women. When any roll of the die will lead to a loss (once women are involved in your life), the sensible thing to do is to avoid playing altogether.

Black betas of all levels of intelligence is what the MRM needs to strengthen itself. Unfortunately, we’ve all become MGTOW. And without a full battle standard, the current MRM isn’t worth the stress. We’ve embraced obsolescence, and its going to take having our backs to the wall to wake us up.

One more thing: Rayon McIntosh is 5’5″, 150lb. When he grabbed a metal rod to defend himself against two women who were his same height and who also outweighed him, there were plenty of “conscious” MRAs on this site who saw fit to white knight on the womens’ behalf. Although I’m more of a lurker than poster, my faith in the movement took a major hit on that day. To be a MRA, you have to walk the talk. An injustice against men shouldn’t be sugarcoated because the man in question is of the same race as Shaq.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 2
Sam March 14, 2012 at 16:59

Did my heart good to hear men standing up. Yet when I voiced my opinion in Huffpuff’s comment section, I got a scathing rebuttal from a woman ending with telling me to “Man up”. Ha! her shaming tactics don’t work with me, and apparently not with a lot of other men either.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 1
Firepower March 14, 2012 at 18:05

boxer

pedophile brigade has your support, too. LOLOLOL!

Nah, your wisdom, logic and maturity
appear perfectly suited for The Important e-Title of
Big Leader around here.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 12
jaego March 14, 2012 at 21:46

Righto! Level the playing field: get rid of both Affirmative Action and the endless glorification of Black Men and denigration of White Men. Then see how your “Black Brother” feels about you as he slides down the socioeconomic pole to his true level, where he belongs. And see how he feels when White Beauties wont even glance in his direction anymore.

Surely you’ve noticed the endless pairing of Blonde Women (the symbol of our race) and Black Men? Surely you’ve noticed all those commercials where Black Men make fools of White Men? Say like the one last year where the White guy is licking the salt of the Black’s finger?

So the upshot: When things get back to normal, Black Men aren’t going to like you very much. They think they deserve these privledges at our expense. They are going to hate you.

As for marriage: Marriage has always been weaker in Africa. The Father isn’t expected to completely support his own children. The relatives do to a large extent. This system works for them since they’re sexuality is greater than our’s. More testosterone. Look it up. So I don’t think they wanted American Monogamy to begin with, not really. That doesn’t justify the Welfare destruction of their marriages of course. In Africa, Patriarchy is the Way in most of the Big Tribes as well as in Islam and African Christianity.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 16
Human-Stupidity.com March 15, 2012 at 01:04

@MaMu1977, very interesting comment. Tying feminism into the demise of black inner cities, motherhood, and black men. Very interesting indeed.

Worth analyzing further. I wonder if the life and environment of blacks always were such a disaster they are now? or if feminism aggravated it.

Partially it might just be caused by the same victim mentality as in feminism. Blacks don’t need to study and work as hard, because all hardship is not due to the evil white man.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 5
DevilDog March 15, 2012 at 01:37

Opened link to see picture of Kelly.
Laughed hysterically. Grabbed pistol, shot computer, grabbed gasoline, threw it on computer and lit it on fire, gouged my eyes out, then shot myself in the face. Unfortunately I survived the attempt on my own life, still look more pleasing than Kelly.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Timothy March 15, 2012 at 04:09

“One more thing: Rayon McIntosh is 5’5″, 150lb. When he grabbed a metal rod to defend himself against two women who were his same height and who also outweighed him, there were plenty of “conscious” MRAs on this site who saw fit to white knight on the womens’ behalf. ”

I remember that. It seems when a black man defends himself against angry females trying to do him bodily harm, he’s only doing so because it’s in his nature as a negro to be violent and not because of self-preservation. There is a call to unite all men together in the MRA, but only if you’re white.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Senior Manchild March 15, 2012 at 09:57

¨After all, if you really believe in equality in everything, why not push for equal salaries for men? The poor things have been suffering for years with all that excess income. Give me a petition. I’d be happy to support a 25-percent reduction in pay across the board.¨

Kelly Cogswell

Be careful what you wish for

To further alienate men, is to bring America to a standstill. Maybe this is just what we need to do though. If I am not mistaken, the great hulking nation really doesn´t have alot of motivation to continue it´s current path anyway. Chop Atlas´legs off as I think it was Frost who mentioned, and it can no longer continue.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Senior Manchild March 15, 2012 at 10:01

It was Twenty who mentioned that, my error

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Pops March 15, 2012 at 14:58

Marriage has always been weaker in Africa.

You to know that the marriage rate overall in Africa is higher than it is in the West and divorce rates in Africa are lower.

http://www.newsrescue.com/2010/08/nigeria-and-its-extravagant-weddings/#axzz1pDzeM28f

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
crypter27 March 15, 2012 at 16:58

Your catching the most flak when your’e right over the target,so its a good sighn were politically kicking they’re asses,but it also means the feminist are lashing out. Like cornered rats,which means we should be patient,for they haven’t been weakened enough to strike the deadly blow. But the time is coming my brothers,we have to be like the patient hunter who knows when to make the kill,but all in due time all in due time!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
CC March 15, 2012 at 19:21

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” — Mohandas Gandhi

Keep up the struggle, brothers. The age of radfems controlling the agenda is near its end.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Nergal March 16, 2012 at 01:39

“I remember that. It seems when a black man defends himself against angry females trying to do him bodily harm, he’s only doing so because it’s in his nature as a negro to be violent and not because of self-preservation. There is a call to unite all men together in the MRA, but only if you’re white.”

*sigh* Same old story here…. For the record,I’m white and that’s not how I feel. I realize there are more than a few dumbasses here that think this is their chance to revive the Klan,but I assure you that I personally never have,nor ever will support any attempt to oust men of any race from the MRM. We need all the men we can get, and black men have proved themselves 100% equal to white men at delivering a serious beatdown to those that oppose freedom.You get a line of black men to start flowing towards the MRM and I will personally shake each and every one of their hands.

I had a white chick try to assault me every day for a year.I didn’t just take it forever,either. I guess I’m a violent negro too.

The color of a person’s skin isn’t going to buy them any sympathy from the feminists once they no longer need black,gay,lesbian, and illegal immigrant hostages,i.e. once their terrorist demands on our society are met.The smart thing to do at this point is for everything with a dick to jump on the MRM bandwagon,get real pissed, and start making some serious noise.I am not kidding.We’re in for a rough ride,kids,but if we pull together we have a chance. Think of the MRM as an ark, the bullshit we have to wade through on a daily basis is the forty days of rain.Like Noah, the task for men of any race is to get all the righteous, wise people we can on this boat before the tide gets higher,and it will.

Unlike Noah, I don’t know if God (whoever he is or isn’t) is going to give us any signs or help us survive.

If black racists,asian racists,white racists,whatever racists can’t put aside their differences long enough to get on the goddamn boat, let them drown in the feminist bullshit with Mantitz,Kimmel,Flood,et al.I have no time for fucktards who think the best way to go up against a larger more organized force is to further fragment your smaller disorganized force and introduce calculatedly controversial and destabilizing propaganda into the mix,further lowering already dismal morale.

To me, if you’re white,you’re a brother,if you’re a brother (or any other race),you’re a brother. I’d rather have someone else who understands the importance of not having your dick forcibly removed(namely,anyone who has one) standing beside me when these cunts finally decide to roll out the tanks on us than one of these “white angelic princesses” that everyone thinks are so special.

I’m white. That’s my ticket to voice an opinion on these matters. Here’s my message to white nationalists:”Fuck your ‘white princesses’.Fuck them all in their flabby smegma-smelling asses.”.Because when some nasty 14-year old boy looking dyke cunt asks them which side they’re on in the “feminist revolution”,it won’t be yours,cocksuckers. Those special little Aryan princesses will piss on your corpses and dance in the street over your dead skinhead bodies. Bank on it,motherfucker.

Same goes for black racists. If you think for one second black women are going to stand together with you in black solidarity once the white women are running everything,you’ve got another thing coming. They’ll have their ticket to the winner’s circle (sorta) at that point and you will wind up as another statistic while she winds up as “another success story”. The crime of rape will be expanded to things like breathing while male,carry a mandatory immediate castration and/or death sentence,and white women will sport and laugh the day away in the nation’s new/old favorite pastime,
lynching black people based on stuff some juvenile,callous,inhuman white bitch came up with in her vacuous imagination.

The stakes are so high we shouldn’t even be having this conversation. What don’t you understand? Forcible castration and/or death for the lucky,labor camps,unendurable abuse,and medical experimentation for the rest. These are their stated goals. Does it fucking matter what color anybody is? Is it more important than a literal international government-supported plan to cut your dick off and kill you somehow?

p.s.Excuse any errors in spelling,sentence structure,etc,very tired,broken keyboard,and pretty pissed off at the moment.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2
Rumour March 16, 2012 at 09:43

“She isn’t scared that a man will beat or rape her (here she is), ”

she must be the man in the relationship.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
jaego March 16, 2012 at 09:45

In other words, life has only one dimension? I cheered the Black guy at McDonald’s too – and I’d be willing to shake his hand if we were organized enough to have Conventions, Conferences, etc. But not for one second do I imagine that he’s my brother. I’ve noticed this with White Men: tremendous ernestness, always giving themselves away. Sound familiar? Blacks, Hispanics, South Asians, East Asains – no. They can smile and laught with you and even mean it – but their heart is with their own people, always. Whites in contrast, are very vulnerable and weak in this regard, and thus incredbily vulnerable once in multi-cultural country as opposed to their own Nations. They know this about us – we’re seen as dorks and clowns now. Quite a come down from the Conquerors we once were.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 6
Firepower March 16, 2012 at 12:08

CC March 15, 2012 at 19:21

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.” — Mohandas Gandhi

Awfully nice platitude – but tell me, if you know your history: What exactly did Gandhi win?

Sainthood in the Liberal Sphere?

Go read how he died.
Then tell me “what” he won.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5
Art Vandelay March 16, 2012 at 13:12

Awfully nice platitude – but tell me, if you know your history: What exactly did Gandhi win?

He also wasn’t big on the “kaffirs”. Ghandi was no saint himself.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Tyrone March 18, 2012 at 07:50

How does the saying go, first they ignore you, then they laugh at you then they hate you, then you win. I’ve seen the MRA movement go from them ignoring us, then laughing at us, now hating us in a few years.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
Firepower March 18, 2012 at 18:35

Art Vandelay

Awfully nice platitude – but tell me, if you know your history: What exactly did Gandhi win?

He also wasn’t big on the “kaffirs”. Ghandi was no saint himself.

Very true, but no doubt a revelation to be similarly ignored amongst the dense reactionaries holding court, here.

Tyrone
I’ve seen the MRA movement go from them ignoring us, then laughing at us, now hating us in a few years.

You do realize, of course, that you’re describing the mrm’s grand achievement will be merely that of being hated…after “years” of effort.

When they finally target The Spearhead with a SlutWalk – in 2057 – does that count as significant?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4
Cecil March 19, 2012 at 10:52

No need to censor me as usual ops, this is an interesting read, relevant to this as I see it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2116870/The-richer-sex-Female-workers-set-earn-men-EVERY-profession-25-years.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man March 19, 2012 at 15:00

@Pops,

Also how long will a WN be an MRA if a white female plays the victim card against a man,particularly if that man is non-white? We don’t need racists of any color in this movement if they need to leach off someone to look legitimate then they can look elsewhere.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man March 19, 2012 at 21:10

One more thing: Rayon McIntosh is 5’5″, 150lb. When he grabbed a metal rod to defend himself against two women who were his same height and who also outweighed him, there were plenty of “conscious” MRAs on this site who saw fit to white knight on the womens’ behalf. Although I’m more of a lurker than poster, my faith in the movement took a major hit on that day. To be a MRA, you have to walk the talk. An injustice against men shouldn’t be sugarcoated because the man in question is of the same race as Shaq.

Not all of us: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/search?q=rayon+mcintosh

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man March 19, 2012 at 21:14

Did my heart good to hear men standing up. Yet when I voiced my opinion in Huffpuff’s comment section, I got a scathing rebuttal from a woman ending with telling me to “Man up”. Ha! her shaming tactics don’t work with me, and apparently not with a lot of other men either.

I wrote about this: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2011/06/man-up-why.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Heather March 19, 2012 at 21:34

Yeah! Feminists are all a bunch of lesbians and man-haters! I’m so glad that my fiance puts up with me, but then I recognize his innate superiority. Sometimes he jokes we’re a team, but I know who’s in charge: HIM! It’s so comforting to know I can rely on him to make all of our big decisions. I just hope that I can support him well enough with sex and housekeeping so that he never has cause to complain!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 7
Ted March 19, 2012 at 23:17

You’ve got the right idea, Heather.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Anonymous March 20, 2012 at 23:20

She looks like John Malkovich.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
crella March 25, 2012 at 02:47

Heather, you just show your ignorance. I suppose it can’t be helped, you’re probably a lot younger than I and probably haven’t seen many intact normal marriages, you may yourself come from a home with no father.

You have swallowed feminist propaganda hook , line and sinker,which also shows you have never done any research of your own.

My great grandparents were born in the late 1870s give or take a few years….grandparents were all born between 1898 and 1904, and my great grandfather was alive till the age of 101, until I was 14. I had a window into that era that young women today do not. Mad Med and women’s studies don’t count.

Great-grandpa on one side was on ships out of Halifax, great grandma ran things while he was away, while taking care of 10 kids, the vegetables she raised and their animals. No bread machines or automatic washers or dishwashers in her era…she worked damned hard and her family respected and idolized her.

Great grandpa on the other side worked for the railroad. He died young, when my grandpa was 13. Great grandma supported the family and financed college educations for both her boys by running her own profitable antique shop, as she’d been doing from before marriage (one who worked for Paramount Studios as a sound editor, one who went to dental school until a motorcycle accident after which he earned a business degree) . I bet that’s a shock to you, that a woman in that era , the late 1800s, had her own business even as a single woman…she owned the family home, ran her business and sent her kids to college.

Grandpa and grandma on one side worked in a factory, that’s how they met, she slipped and fell and he rushed to help her up (he’d had his eye on her for quite a while and took his chance). They continued to work until their last kid was out of high school. She, unfortunately was the she-bitch from hell and I totally disown her as part of my heritage.

The other grandparents were a businessman (the one who had the motorcycle accident) and a secretary. My grandmother was a working woman in the 1930s and 40s (gasp!), she rose to become the secretary to the police chief of a major city.

Among my other similarly aged relatives are school teachers, nurses and some aunts who never married or lost their husbands in the war, who all owned their own property, despite what women’s studies courses will tell you.

Outside of the one rotten grandmother, all the family marriages were happy. These women took responsibility for their lives and decisions. I don’t think they were unusual…..you could find similar women in every family tree, if you looked. Abusing one’s wife, cheating, over drinking, swearing and all those behaviors that men are charged with (‘thousands of years of abusing women’) were NOT condoned by society. The United States was one of the first countries to have labor laws to protect women and children, and anti-wife beating laws (from the mid-1600s…Maryland was the first state to enact). You notice I said ‘women and children’…men have always got the short end of the stick.

Any of these women would spit in the face of the foul-mouthed aggressive promiscuous things that call themselves ‘women’ these days.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Fire April 9, 2012 at 09:45

ecnayonnA March 13, 2012 at 05:02
the tricky part is waking up the men to misandry. the hard part is when the feminists react to all their ill gotten privileges being taken away from them.

we live in such interesting times.

………………………………………………….

i know how to slave that one

1. Q. the tricky part is waking up the men to misandry

1. A. to solve that we need to turns mens weakness into a strength…. our sexual urges that got us into this mess, will get us out of it!

* make men realize that giving into women sexist habbits is often counter produtive to getting laid….. those of us who study pua and the game know that taking girls out for dinner and paying for them does not help us get laid…. in fact often just the oposite.

men often put up with women being sexist for 3 reasons…..

1. for sexual reasons either with her or girls around her.

2. he is expected to…. and he is not allowed to use his greatest weapon on girls… his fists…. but they can hit him and we are shamed if we hit her back or call the cops….. were as women are engouraged to do both…….. in other words men are expected to put up with womens sexist habbits and often times men do for the sake of whats expected of them or fear of being shamed.

3. brain washing of a young age to give women special treatment.

women have been trying ti brain wash me itno giving them sexist special treatment since i was 10 years old…… good thing i learned about sexism and discrimantion at age 9….. american values of freedom got to be first!.

…..

so to wake up men to the fact that they are being discrinated agsint.

1. make sure boys are eductated in the Deffintion of discrimation and sexism as soon as possable…. “giving special treatment to one group or gender over another” (dont trust googles deffintion as is specificly mentions women)

*this will stop much of the brain washing that makes men think its okay to have little boys forced to pull out chairs for girls in elemrnty school.

2. make men realize that they can actualy get sex more easy by standing up for them selves and not following sexual baised dating or courting habbits…… as most women lose respect for men who give them the very same special treatment they ask for.

3. teach men how to properly insult women….. becuase using logic to point out a women misandry is likley to result in insults back to that man…… men are expected to tolerate it, and men dont know how to handle it when they see it…… thats why it helps to know how to insult women who are making sexist comments. “wow, i would never want to date a girl who spoke about men like that.”….. or “wow, any girl who acts like that must be ugly and can only get desperate guys”… or “your make up makes you look like a clown, i bet you cant even leave the house without your face paint on loser!”

……..

as for womens reaction (not femmisnists…. women)

as for womens reaction to losing there sexist special treatment…… logic ussualy fails when it comes to women….. women dont use it often as you have seen….. what do women use?…. insults… shaming lanaguege…. .and that is what we need to do to them..

logic and shaming tactics work on males…… but when it comes to women shaming tactics seem to work notably better. (fight fire with fire)

when women start losing there sexist special treatment….. hit them with 70% shaming tactics…. and 30% logic…. and point out your only copying them…. so they can see how they act right back at them.

once women start growing up…. and evloving past there child like ways….. men can ease off the shaming tactics…. and talk to women using logic once when act like big girls who are mature.

when women stop saying things like “i think a man should operate the tiolet seat for a women”….. and they start saying things like ” i think women should respect men, and contribute”…. then we know women have grown up enough to ease of shaming them and start showing them how to be eqauls to us dispites all there short comings.

(if women gave men sex all the time….. i might considerd them eqauls….. they might not be as strong, as smart, or as productive….. but they would be eqaul in terms of how usful most men see them….. assuming they can also ajust there attitudes.)…….. (sadly your avaerge women is the exact oposite of a contritbutor, they cant even pay for there own food)

………..

so step 1….. make men realize fighting women and sexism by them is bennifcial to us getting laid…. as always men will follow the sex as its a biological need.

step 2…. when men in western worlds having more accese to sex…. they wont be willing to put up with womens crap any more….. women will start to lose there special treatment….. and when women complain we use shaming tactics on them

“you dont think men deserve eqaul rights when it comes to children?…. wow… you sexist….your a loser…. no man will ever want an ugly girl like you…. unless hes desperate, good bye”

“you dont agree that men should be able to abort responsilibly for there kid like a women can?…. wow, your sexist….. how pethetic…. you must be bitter and hate men….. your going to get dumped alot in your life, i can tell….. and if you dont then the guy is just desoerte an cant do any better.”

those insults will work on women, and change our sociaity……. thats the type of stuff women say to men….. but in order for men to do it, men need to be sexual free….. they need to be sexualy secure in enough sexual resources….. and they need to realize that fighing sexism in one way or another can only help them get laid….. as doing what women say and discrimnating agsint out selves is counter prodctuive to getting laid.

men will follow the sex…. men need to reliaze that pushing for your eqaul rights helps you get laid…. if you know how to go about it.

“girl trys to get you to take her out to dinner…. you dont want to spend money on her ass….. so you use the same manitpuation tactics she does to have sex with her….. thus now you have the power to stand up for your rights becuase you are sexual safe using the knwoldge you have to get laid and still stick up for your rights”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Fire April 11, 2012 at 05:19
Fire April 11, 2012 at 05:19
scott November 18, 2012 at 14:26

Feminism seems like a political cult everyone involved becomes detached from reality. And is silmier to fasism and communism bacuase they all have 3 things in common.

1, they need a emeny. for feminist’s it’s men. we already all know who the emeny’s of fasism and communism are.
2, it’s seductive to it’s target audenience. for feminism it’s women. for fasism it’s white people and for communism it’s the poor.
3, it’s all about money and power for the elites up top.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: