Another Naughty Teacher

by W.F. Price on February 24, 2012

The LAUSD teacher-student sex scandal added another suspect after an 18-year-old boy reported having been seduced by 42-year-old Gabriela Cortez of Montebello. Soon, another “victim” was found, and the Spanish teacher was arrested soon thereafter. Cortez is youthful looking, and her booking photo is surprisingly flattering, so it doesn’t appear that the boys were subjected to any serious trauma, but nevertheless teachers having sex with students is still considered a crime, even when the students are past the age of consent.

Unlike the allegations against against Mark Berndt, who is alleged to have done truly vile things to very young children, this case is quite minor, but it does bring up a couple of issues. First, there is the question of whether it should even be a crime when adults sleep with adolescents. This is not to say that it should be acceptable for teachers to do so, but wouldn’t termination be more appropriate than arrest and incarceration? Parents should have the option of suing the adult, but when the youth is past the age of 16 criminal prosecution should probably be off the table.

Secondly, it exposes a contradiction inherent in our law regarding sex. Supposedly, a male of any age is equally as responsible for sex as a female when it comes to child support. In fact, he is more responsible, because he has no choice as far as carrying the child to term. This being the case, how can a woman be held criminally liable for sex with a male of any age? In this case, if Cortez had been impregnated, the student would have been liable for child support, even as the teacher is charged with a crime. How does that make any sense?

{ 53 comments… read them below or add one }

hf February 24, 2012 at 12:34

“How does that make any sense?”

It doesnt make any sense.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 48 Thumb down 0
Somehow Somewhat February 24, 2012 at 12:40

“so it doesn’t appear that the boys were subjected to any serious trauma, but nevertheless teachers having sex with students is still considered a crime, even when the students are past the age of consent. ”

Teachers hold the “position of trust” (no pun intended). Whether the teacher used intimidation or not, sex with students is considered rape. Same as sex with a prisoner. It can never be consensual. The way it should be.

This article brings another concern. Whenever female-teacher male-victim rape happens, comment sections are filled with “where were these teachers when I was a teenage student?” type of comments. It is assumed that the boys “enjoy” the experience and do not suffer anyhow emotionally or otherwise. This assumption is fallacious.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 9
Lovekraft February 24, 2012 at 12:42

men her own age have rejected her, so this loser has to prey on the children of her neighbors.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 42 Thumb down 4
Zorro February 24, 2012 at 12:42

How does that make any sense?

It doesn’t.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
Opus February 24, 2012 at 12:46

I know that teachers are not – now – supposed to become romantically involved with their students, but he was eighteen, old enough (over here) to marry without parental consent and (over here) two years older than the age at which one may officially have sex. What’s the problem?

For what it is worth (you do not need to know this, so look away now) I lost my virginity at just sixteen to an older woman, and the idea that I was forced, groomed or seduced (we’d just met) is laughable, and I leave it to you all to decide whether I was affected adversely for life. My ‘seducer’ who did not know my age; liked young flesh, obviously; but I was not a child and had not been for a year or two.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 9
Somehow Somewhat February 24, 2012 at 12:52

I have to add:

There are lots of double-standards in dealing with male victims of statutory rape. http://reason.com/archives/2002/06/04/double-standard

Or consider this case: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3192883/Mother-was-seduced-by-14-year-old-boy-says-judge.html

People in position of trust should never have sex with the people they are entrusted with.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 1
Eric Wolf February 24, 2012 at 13:07

How does it make sense?

We are at war with East Asia. We have always been at war with East Asia.

War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

Two plus two makes five.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 2
td9red February 24, 2012 at 13:15

@Opus

I think he is 18yrs-old now. But, I think the alleged sex happened when he was younger. The way I read the article, it happened when he was a student at her school. He is not a student now.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 6
AfOR February 24, 2012 at 13:16

FWIW the law here in the UK states that the age of consent is 16, unless one of the two is in any position of authority of any kind, eg teacher, step parent, employer, driving instructor etc.

In these cases, it is just the same as fucking an under 16 year old, eg statutory rape.

I am sick and fucking tired of cunts apologizing and minimizing it, I mean WTF are you thinking Bill, she was hot so statutory rape ain’t so bad?????, talk about double standards when we reverse the roles, and trust me, the young girls are fucking hot for it and often the instigators.

Bitch, hot or not, should go on the sex offender registry for life and do 20 years hard time in Joliet…. JUST LIKE A FUCKIN MAN WOULD DO.

en dof

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 4
Anonymous February 24, 2012 at 13:20

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 40
Lovekraft February 24, 2012 at 13:20

Having and maintaining moral standards is an integral part of a properly functioning society.

By lowering and diluting these standards, notably giving impulsive women access to no-fault divorce, we go on a race to the bottom. At core of many of the issues we face as MRAs is an acceptance of carnality in pop culture.

What this issue reflects in the MRM is twofold: a chance to prove we have standards (like keeping our muggy paws off the children of our neighbors), and the ability to discuss matters in a rational and respectful manner.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 3
Ambivalent February 24, 2012 at 13:48

You only get a break away from bad laws when they are consistently applied to all and sundry, whatever the class, gender, rank, race, culture or religion of the perpetrator.

The more prettier, youthful looking or well endowed the female perpetrator of statutary rape, the more the social clamour is raised against such obviously bad a law.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
piercedhead February 24, 2012 at 14:02

Whether one thinks sex between adults and adolescents should be criminalized on a par with murder at one extreme, or casually tolerated at the other, is a matter of opinion.

But subjecting everyone to the same law, no matter whether they are man or woman, ugly or beautiful, young or old – that’s how we best avoid extreme, nonsensical laws that only drive everyone nuts (except perhaps those who make a living out of it all, like DAs, jailers, judges, cops, psychologist evaluators, politicians, newspapers, etc).

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 0
freebird February 24, 2012 at 14:18

Whats good for the gander is good for the goose.
Once again,if the sexes were reversed,the man would have hell to pay.

Branded a deviant in the community for life.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 0
Anonymous February 24, 2012 at 14:37

“How does that make any sense? ”

The purpose of laws is to make money for lawyers. That’s how it makes sense.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
DCM February 24, 2012 at 14:40

“How does that make any sense? ”

The purpose of laws is to make money for lawyers. Even laws that otherwise make sense serve that purpose.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
anynomous 101 February 24, 2012 at 14:41

Red Pill Red Flag
Why Are Young Men Angry?
by sober down under

This column shows how women are incapable of understanding how bad young men have it in this day and age. The Sydney Morning Herald’s Katherine Feeney regularly writes blog posts that ask inane questions that highlight how silly female journalists are. The comments on the Stuff repost and on the original article are full of misandrist commentary and variations on a theme – man up.

From age 5, young men have been told how they are disgusting human beings. Girls can do anything, girls can punch boys without getting punched back and girls will be successful career women. Boys can’t play rough-and-tumble without getting sent to detention. They can’t stand up for themselves when it is completely justified, because it runs the risk of being labelled a “problem child” and drugged with Ritalin to subvert normal, healthy, young male developmental behaviour.

By the time a young man makes it to university, he is the product of a system that doesn’t want him. Young women define what is attractive in young men, and for the bottom 80% of the male population, they might as well not exist. They are literally invisible to young women due to the apex fallacy and the belief that even an overweight, overopinionated, liberal arts graduate deserves a young man in the form of an All Black or high flying businessman.

All of the claims that young men force young women into starvation diets and feeling bad about themselves because of some “beauty standard” is nonsense. Young women shame young women. Young women mock men they aren’t attracted to who have a go at asking them out or hitting on them. They call unwanted attention “creepy” and use sexual harassment laws and false rape accusations to literally castrate the bottom 80% of young men.

Young men have the highest unemployment rate, young men have the highest suicide rate, young men have the highest workplace death rate, young men have the highest level of debt and young men have the lowest incomes and net worth. For being young, they are punished for something that is literally out of their control.

Just 50 years ago, the average young man was faced with a completely different span of life outcomes. It was possible for a high school graduate to obtain a job in a factory or in the trades that would enable him to save money, buy a house, support a wife and family and enjoy the weekend after a solid week of work.

The situation young men face in 2012 is completely incomparable to that faced by a young man in 1950. Even if you are from a high income family in this day-and-age, your prospects are far worse than you have been led to believe.

Young men are angry because each time they achieve a life marker that meant something to their parent’s and grandparent’s generation – high school graduation, university graduation, a graduate job if they’re lucky – they come to realise that the level of attainment they’ve been promised is not a few years away, it is literally decades away.

And then they see how lucky young women are in this day and age. A double standard exists where young women receive scholarships and awards for simply having a vagina, when a young man will have an enormous student loan balance. I will not even address the long disproven myth of a pay gap between young men and young women.

The truth is that a young man today, unless he earns more than several hundred thousand dollars a year or has assets worth millions from inheritance or a business, is the economic and social inferior of a young woman.

Young women literally don’t need young men for anything other than a root. And for a root, they pick men who they wouldn’t touch with a ten foot barge pole if there was no abortion, birth control, single mother welfare or high incomes for educated career women.

The apex fallacy means that women are only attracted to what they perceive to be the best men on offer. They’ve convinced themselves that they deserve an alpha male. They’ve convinced themselves that they can fuck whoever they want and then settle down without a beta male provider batting an eyelid at their sexual history.

And that’s where young men become angry. They see exactly what the real situation is. When you are young and have nothing to offer, you are invisible. The moment you have a high income, high social status or some other gimmick you suddenly become attractive. But you resent this because you are not attractive in the way you want to be perceived as attractive.

Young men are angry because not all of them know that there are other ways to become more attractive to women. The manosphere and game, improving your looks, fashion sense and muscularity are proven solutions that might not turn you into an adonis but will get you laid more regularly and make you feel less angry.

But then comes the other problem for angry young men. When they do take these steps to become more successful with young women, they expose themselves to enormous risks which only someone who has swallowed the red pill about how evil modern young women are could even comprehend.

The risk of false accusations, the risk of sexual harassment nonsense thwarting a promising career, the risk of an unplanned pregnancy or even worse, being convinced of paternity when the child’s father is some other dude your cupcake screwed while you were still in the office at 10pm.

As a gambling man, I view angry young men as the guys who have looked at what is on offer, calculated their odds of attaining the skills and success necessary to get what they want from young women, and decided that their best bet is not playing the game at all.

Angry young men are still capable of earning enough to pay for video games, beer, HDTV and trips overseas where they can find more feminine women. But when the current economic system collapses under the weight of primarily male innovators going on strike, they won’t be able to distract themselves with Call of Duty and “going their own way”.

Unless angry young men are placated, shit is going to get real. No guy I know has had net positive experiences with women. By net positive, I mean that, despite nearly all of them having had nice girlfriends at one point, the psychotic bullshit they’ve all had to deal with at one point means that they treat women like crap.

Treating women like crap, funnily enough, serves as a form of temporary pain relief from the bullshit world we live in. Pumping and dumping girls, if you’ve developed that skill, becomes easier and easier when you realise that while you have had to hustle like a motherfucker for every cent to your name, you still end up fucking girls with a communications degree who have no student loan because they got vagina-only scholarships and a payrise within 6 months of starting their graduate job that means they earn more than their actual economic value to society is.

This environment absolutely guts me. Because of our design as survival and replication machines, I would love nothing more than to have children someday. But in this environment, I don’t think I could find a woman anywhere on this planet who has not been infected by the feminist virus or the golddigger gene.

Male-female relations are at an all time low. Despite the happy mirage of couples holding hands, marriages still happening and babies being born – the world is going to hell in a hand basket.

It will only get worse because young women are actually accelerating away. Higher levels of education are easier to obtain when you are subsidised and molly-coddled every step of the way. Angry young men on the other hand are encouraged to fall by the wayside.

Let them sweep the streets while the empowered young women write memos to each other in air-conditioned offices.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 1
Uncle Elmer February 24, 2012 at 15:18

“…18-year-old boy reported having been seduced by 42-year-old Gabriela Cortez of Montebello…”

————————-

While the victim’s identity has been concealed, police are referring to him by the code-name “Fernando”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Rocco February 24, 2012 at 15:46

In the late 1980′s I knew a teacher at an LAUSD school. She was in her early 40′s, not bad looking for her age, she sort of looked like snooky, but she had a 16 year old boyfriend from the HS she taught at across the street from her house.

She also had custody of her 3 kids.

To see the scene, in the 1980′s, told me all the things men are learning today from these type articles.

She didn’t hide it, it wasn’t casual and no one cared.

She didn’t try to hide it from her kids and she was obviously proud of here “boy”friend.

Well, it was disgusting, it was morally grotesque, just as it would be to see a proud 45 year old male teacher with his 16 year old HS girlfriend, walking proudly down the block.

She was a radical feminist.

And she got HPV with precancer on her clit that year.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 3
Anon February 24, 2012 at 15:49

How does that make any sense?

Since when are laws that women consider ideal, supposed to make sense?

Your paradigm of ‘sense’ is under the assumption that male well-being matters. It does not, in any society where women have the right to vote.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
Rocco February 24, 2012 at 16:00

OT

If anyone doubts our claims about that fatherhood is now a criminal offence, take a look at this article in which the authorities agree, their system will land you in a jail cell if the wind blows the wrong way or your kids say you love them and will protect them.

Here a father is arrested, strip searched and imprisoned because his daughter drew a stick figure gun in preschool and told the teacher here daddy was going to protect her from monsters.

The standard protocol is that you the father go directly to prison. It probably cost him 10,000 dollars and his trust in his nation, his society and his own safety with his children…..and frandly it should, and the authorities admit is and say they did nothing wrong:

“But what is bad news, and entirely predictable, is how quickly all three groups involved in committing this injustice upon Sansone and his family are trying to insist that they did everything exactly right. The school is insisting that its teachers are obligated to report potential signs that their students might be in danger to Family and Children’s Services, which in turn insist that when they receive such notifications, they are obligated to investigate. And given the nature of the accusation, Family Services was compelled to notify the police, who have procedures for dealing with allegations of an unauthorized weapon in a home, especially one with children.”

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/02/24/matt-gurney-police-arrest-and-stripsearch-innocent-man-after-child-doodles-a-gun/

If you read the article notice how the social workers lie and tell the cops the guy has a gun and the kids have access to it.

No one ever eve suggested this, it was made up from whole cloth and that is why no matter what you do you cannot win, the state owns your children.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
Anonymous February 24, 2012 at 16:13

@anynomous 101:

Much anger here. It will serve no purpose: you are destroying yourself.
Definitely not worth if, friend: life is too short for that.

Take a look at the Japanese “grass eaters”: they don’t really care, do they? And they seem happy.

I would recommend you take a couple of steps back, take a deep breath and to say:”Fuck it! I don’t care anymore!”

The world has changed: it contains 7 billion humans. WAY too many.
Things will never come back the way they were in the 50′s.

Take whatever you can and simply don’t give a shit about what you can’t control: life will be so much easier that way, I promise you.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 4
Rebel February 24, 2012 at 16:16

I just realized that my ‘puter had a slight problem: my last post does not indicate name and e-mail address.
I am the one who posted to Anonymous 101.

Sorry for this little problem

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Anonymous February 24, 2012 at 16:48

Rebel

Actually, it’s not a bad idea to post under the name ” Anonymous “. That way you can call someone a grumpy old goat or whatever the feck you want and they won’t have the slightest idea who it is ?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Anonymous age 69 February 24, 2012 at 16:54

Anonymous, you are an example of what I call “I got mine!”

You got some good middle-aged pussy, therefore we are supposed to continue putting men in jail for 20 years, and applauding women for the same offense? How disgusting.

However, you do demonstrate exactly how after 45 years of MRA work we have accomplished exactly nothing to even slow the evil feminist hordes.

Is anyone here so stupid they don’t think the girls who have sex with older men don’t also enjoy that sex?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 2
Jimbo February 24, 2012 at 16:59

@afor. Exactly

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Mickey T February 24, 2012 at 17:06

RE: 12:52
Somehow Somewhat says:
“People in a position of trust should never have sex with people they are entrusted with.”

So, because we entrust women, we should trust them??

Sounds like good material for a vixen in the hen house joke.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Jimbo February 24, 2012 at 17:12

@anynomous 101

Among other reasons, what you just wrote is why the spearhead means so much to me. I’ve been reading and writing about feminism since 1987 and I can enjoy reading the words of quite a few people like yourself that can do it a hell of a lot better than me. Hell of a summation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Mickey T February 24, 2012 at 17:15

Also-
The only way we can “trust” a woman, is to make clear there will be serious accountability if she betrays that “trust”.

I don’t believe we can make good on that promise right now.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
Anonymous February 24, 2012 at 17:19

Study Shows Women Are Smarter Than Men About Social Media

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2012/02/24/study-shows-women-are-smarter-than-men-about-social-media/

Anonymous begs to differ :

Studies have shown that men invented “social media” and women have contributed exactly nothing to its development.

It’s just as well, because studies have also shown that today’s women can’t cook either :

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/02/20/a-man-wants-a-wife-not-a-co-worker/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
Rocco February 24, 2012 at 17:33

@ Anon 69

My HS band teacher, a guy and also a pro drummer on some pop songs of the time always had a 16 year old hot-in a skanky way- girl that was his “assistant” and sat at his desk while we rehearsed and did nothing…

…..it was ever thus.

IMO, most of the world has it right and stays out of these mutual things with late teens but in the US the UFU, United Feminist Union cannot have competition, freedom for men or women or to keep their noses out of your business.

Very unhappy jealous people spreading the suffering.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Doug1 February 24, 2012 at 17:34

In this case, if Cortez had been impregnated, the student would have been liable for child support, even as the teacher is charged with a crime. How does that make any sense?

It doesn’t and laws to that effect in states around the country should be changed. Open and shut case. Period.

I don’t think it should be a crime for teachers to have sex with age of consent students. It should however be an issue of civil liability. I think the real issue is that there’s going to be a strong pull on her or his part to favoring that student grade wise, unfairly to other students. I think any feminist or so-con crap about being in a mentoring-power relationship etc. is bs. Well not entirely bs, but that that is evil is bs. People often like that.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
MRA February 24, 2012 at 17:47

” if Cortez had been impregnated, the student would have been liable for child support, even as the teacher is charged with a crime. How does that make any sense?”

That is the key about age of consent, underage males are forced to pay child support not matter he was raped, but when the underage females have sex they can abort, free thanks to the state who is going to pay the bill using TAXES, or make the man pays, so is responsibility free for women in tax payers pocket.

That is why is reasonable for boys have higher age of consent than girls.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
MRA February 24, 2012 at 18:01

Abortion investigation: Health Secretary Andrew Lansley to report clinics and doctors to police

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9100252/Abortion-investigation-Health-Secretary-Andrew-Lansley-to-report-clinics-and-doctors-to-police.html

Just like India, China or South Korea UK women want boys.

http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/11/26/ad-companies-trash-boys-in-pro-daughter-campaign/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rebel February 24, 2012 at 18:11

@Anonymous February 24, 2012 at 16:48
Rebel

Actually, it’s not a bad idea to post under the name ” Anonymous “. That way you can call someone a grumpy old goat or whatever the feck you want and they won’t have the slightest idea who it is ?”

I know it sounds odd and sucks, but your writing style looks somehow familiar…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Rebel February 24, 2012 at 18:57

@Anon69:
“However, you do demonstrate exactly how after 45 years of MRA work we have accomplished exactly nothing to even slow the evil feminist hordes.”

True enough. We have hardly accomplished anything in that sense.

But we have gained a lot of men’s consciousness, though.

When things start to move, it will be in a downward direction: a free fall, just like the Towers.

And nothing will stop the fall.

It won’t be a happy day when shit hits the fan.
The only consolation is that the culprit will suffer more.

You may be safer in Mexico. The young ones would be wise to move or become ghosts, for even beta males will be hunted down for whatever little they can bring to women.
Those who will succumb to the supplication of women will pay a heavy price. The preying mantis will get hungry. Beware.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Common Monster February 24, 2012 at 20:40

I would echo Somewhat^2′s sentiments. Where I live, the perps are substantially younger, like mid-20s to low-30s. Many are fully able to get attention from males for whom they do not have a fiduciary responsibility. It does no harm to their dating/mating prospects to make some small proportion of males into jailbait.

In one case, the teacher was partying with a small group of the guys, buying them alcohol, and basically being the experienced party bitch like she’d probably been in college. Big girl on campus in a high school environment…

The victims’ girl classmates probably hate her guts more than anybody else, because they can’t compete with a woman like that. And the guy classmates are probably not paying so much attention in math class, because they’re too busy trying to figure out what they have to do to be some teacher’s very special pet, now that it’s a possibility.

In short, this sort of crime is like a computer virus in that it messes up the task at hand, which doesn’t include providing students as sex partners for teachers. The damage spreads out through the entire school community.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Rocco February 24, 2012 at 21:52

OT

Here’s an interesting article. Here the Cato Institute seems to have become aware of the MRM and the problems boys and men face.

They agree with much of what we say here, of course they invent causes.

Here is their solution:

“Aside from school reforms that could help keep boys more engaged, the new gender gap has no obvious solutions. The profound economic changes that have led to female success and male stagnation have also transformed our culture and its expectations for men. ”

I think treating women as equals, exact equals, no marriage, no children and MGTOW will be the “solutions” she’s looking for and not the mass imprisonment and creation of lists that the brown shirt Nazi feminists are currently implementing.

http://www.cato-unbound.org/2011/08/08/kay-hymowitz/whats-happening-to-men/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Steve_85 February 24, 2012 at 22:33

@Mickey T
“The only way we can “trust” a woman, is to make clear there will be serious accountability if she betrays that “trust”.

I don’t believe we can make good on that promise right now.”

Of course we can make good on that promise. The issue comes from what happens AFTER we make good on it.

What a lot of people fail to realise is that the police are not a shield. They are a club that is used to punish people who break our laws. They will punish you after the fact, but they cannot be everywhere and actually PREVENT things.

We absolutely could follow through on those consequences. It would result in us going to jail though.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Rocco February 24, 2012 at 23:14

OT

Just as some minorities have words they use they don’t want others to use, I would like to think the MRM is open minded and has a sense of humor.

If you have a few minutes here’s a hilarios Tosh.O recent video called “Rock Paper Balls” and it seems to have been invented by some Canadian rock heads but it is funny.

Tosh.O brings it back to LA but instead of him being hit in the balls when he loses “Rock Paper Scissors” it’s his “biggest blogger” a female that is hit in the crotch.

If you want equality this is what it looks like, I thought it was hilarious but I’ve lived in LA for over 20 years and have a warped sense of humor.

http://tosh.comedycentral.com/video-clips/rock–paper–balls

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Auntie Pheminizm February 25, 2012 at 03:04

> “the idea that I was forced, groomed or seduced (we’d just met) is laughable, and I leave it to you all to decide whether I was affected adversely for life”

Many kids who were beaten as kids think it’s okay to beat their own kids, too.

Sorta like a guy blinded in one eye thinks nothing of blinding his own spawn.

If a 42 year-old man screwed your 16-year-old daughter would you think that laughable, too? I mean particularly if they’d “just met.”

Just sayin’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
Auntie Pheminizm February 25, 2012 at 03:10

> “it still stumps me that any male would cut off his access to pussy”

Of course. It’s what all pussy-begging, blue-pill manginas think.

Of course they’re the same men who want to KILL the 40-year-old males who butt-fuck their willing 16-year-old daughters.

It’s typical of the double-standards held by male feminists.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
Auntie Pheminizm February 25, 2012 at 03:26

> “Much anger here. It will serve no purpose: you are destroying yourself.”

Fuck you. Anger is exactly the right and healthy response to injustice. It’s bottled-up of anger that’s toxic.

Stuffed male anger also let fembotulism spread.

Now I’m SURE you told each and every feminist on earth, who routinely rages against men and sanity, that THEY should meditate, too, right?

Like I said, fuck you and the feminist mangina white horse you road in on.

PS. It’s people who are always “nice-nice” that tend to get cancer…or end up shooting others. They have bodies buried under their houses, neighbors claiming the perp would never hurt a fly…like Norman Bates.

By the way, are you a female social worker? Busybody? What?

Sounds like fembots brainwashed you into castrating your ugly “emotions.” Do you hate you “beastly” appendage, too?

A man who is never outraged by anything isn’t a man. It’s a slug.

Just sayin’

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 2
Mickey T February 25, 2012 at 05:10

RE:22:33

PC=Protected Class

It’s all political, Steve_85.
When enough good men realize that, and realize that power is available to them, and decide to do something, we are on our way.

@ Auntie Pheminizm

Good attitude. Anger could be good and necessary. But only when it’s controlled and we understand it’s only one early step in fighting this abomination which now upon us.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
Somehow Somewhat February 25, 2012 at 05:20

OT,

Grandfather arrested after holding a suspected buglar at gunpoint:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/02/21/new-hampshire-man-faces-felony-charge-after-firing-gun-into-ground-near-burglar/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Boxer February 25, 2012 at 13:03

Dear Anonymous:

Like you, I indulged in the older set when I was younger; though I didn’t go as far as you. The most extreme was a 32-year old divorcée when I was 22-23. She was a great cook, a sexual acrobat, had her own money and apartment, and didn’t play the bullshit games the 2o-something chicks seem so enamored with.

There are a couple of conflicting issues here. Unlike you and I, the victim of this rape was exploited by an authority figure. I teach school and some of my students are dual-enrollment kids (high school kids who are allowed to take college courses, age 16-17, etc.) These girls can be quite well-developed and attractive. They also are prone to becoming attached to a teacher.

Pedagogues have a classical duty to refrain from personalizing the relationships they build with their pupils. That rule has existed since the days of Plato and Ovid, and I take it seriously. If I pulled a Hugo Schwyzer and started banging my students, I could probably escape justice, because most of my teenagers are over the age of consent, but they wouldn’t learn as much from me and they’d come away from my course with a conflated ego, wondering whether they earned their marks on merit or whether they “fucked their way to a 4.0″.

This is the reason it’s important to critique men like Hugo Schwyzer (the male feminist who proudly admits to banging his students at his college) and women like Cortez. It isn’t just a matter of sex with someone older. It’s about authority and professionalism.

Before I had my present position, I worked at a financial institution, and before that I worked in a call centre. I’ve always found work to be a pleasant distraction from gaming sluts and kissing manginas’ asses. I strongly believe it’s a masculine trait to concentrate on work while working, and save pursuing pussy and social interactions for later. This separation of the personal from professional horizon will also serve one well to avoid sexual harassment counseling, get promotions on time, and getting recommended for extra goodies at work (paid time off, etc.). The fact is that people who spend their working hours looking for sex are not taken seriously by their colleagues or superiors, and whether or not it’s verbalised it is a black mark against a brother who spends his office hours looking for relationships and/or sex.

Regards, Boxer

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
Darrell February 25, 2012 at 14:11

Great supportive YouTube video I just came across today!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41PanwpYZXM&feature=g-vrec&context=G20a00f3RVAAAAAAAABg

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
JFP February 25, 2012 at 18:17

Opus, yeah there are plenty of guys like you who made out ok making out with the older woman. Thing is, when it doesn’t work out we’ve lived in a society that promotes covering it up when its boys/women.

I know a guy who knocked up one of his high school teachers. Teacher raised the boy and the guy has never been involved with his kid. The guy has been divorced once (he cheated with a married or divorced woman IIRC), had alcohol issues and is now a born again type (and clueless in many many ways). His actions and the pregnancy split his whole family down the middle in various ways and some have said it helped lead to his own parents divorce. One parent wanted to recognize the bastard son and the other did not. You have a young man now who’s teacher mother is dead and has no idea that his biological father lives in the same tri county area.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Common Monster February 26, 2012 at 09:42

I thought I’d elaborate on the idea that these teacher-student affairs constitute a form of social incest, and that’s why they’re against the law. They affect a lot more than just the two people involved.

Another case, from where I was living half dozen years ago, involved a 32 y.o. married mother of three. The mugshot shows her as anything but a fugly who obviously can’t get a date. Quite the contrary. She wasn’t even a plainjane. Closer to an 8 or a 9 for that general category of woman. If she’d wanted to mess around on the side, she wouldn’t have had any problems out in the general population.

The affair had gone on for eighteen months. The whole school knew about it. Except for anyone in a position of authority. In other words, it was common knowledge among all the kids, but they maintained a code of silence about it except among themselves, so no parent or other adult found out about it for a full year and a half. Everybody knew somebody who had either been in the teacher’s class or taken it themselves.

Then a peculiar thing happened. Less than a month after the story broke, my car broke down about an hour’s drive outside town, on the sort of road where someone else may drive by only every couple of minutes. It was getting dark. Well, the first person to go by stopped and gave me a ride, and it turned out to be one of the other students from the high school.

I’ve taught college, so I generally know how to relate to kids that age, to draw them out without sounding like a parent lecturing them on right and wrong. (Besides, he was giving me a ride.) So we had an interesting conversation. Typical good kid — he even went out of his way to drop me off at the closest major intersection to where I was living. But I think it had messed with his head, and that was why he was out driving around aimlessly not far from the middle of nowhere, feeling the freedom of the open road.

I think these instances of female teachers doing it to male students should arguably be punished more severely than when men do it, simply because it is so much easier for any woman to find a sex partner, and therefore the crime is that much more senseless and damaging.

The problem with getting bogged down in age-of-consent technicalities is we all know legalistic thinking, otherwise known as “cop-out” thinking, is very common when it comes to personal sexual ethics. When you’re going there, you’re already in trouble.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Wilson February 26, 2012 at 12:23

A lot of people meet their partners at work… Probably in the majority of cases sexual teacher-student relationships aren’t harmful, and let’s be honest men are less capable of being harmed by a sexual experience than women are, but it should of course be illegal in order to protect the minority who are harmed.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
Oddsock February 26, 2012 at 12:54

Wilson

“A lot of people meet their partners at work… Probably in the majority of cases sexual teacher-student relationships aren’t harmful, and let’s be honest men are less capable of being harmed by a sexual experience than women are”

Do you have evidence of this ? Where can it be found ? Are you talking about Men or the boys that have been raped by much older female teachers ?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
Boxer February 26, 2012 at 13:25

Dear Wilson:

A lot of people meet their partners at work…

I know. I have too. Don’t be one of these dopes who does this crap.

I’ve seen countless PUA wannabes trying to game sluts at various professional postings I’ve had. I’ve seen angry husbands/wives and fathers/mothers of the couple’s children show up at work when one partner decides to start banging co-workers (a lot of women will “forget” they have relationships/live-in boyfriends when a handsome new stud comes to the office – whoops!). I’ve seen many people (usually male, but some female too) go through the sexual harassment education program when they were too persistent in pursuing their colleagues. I’ve seen the couple who breaks up and makes up in the break (up?) room. I’ve seen the awkwardness of the couple who breaks up and dates other people, and both parties are forced to still work on projects together afterward.

Of course, there are guys like myself and my brothers, who are above all this trash. Women are easy to get. You can get one anywhere. No reason to sully the professional environment with gaming sluts.

Regards, Boxer

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
John K April 2, 2012 at 10:45

There is no question that sex between an adult and an older adolescent (high school age) is ethically wrong, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that the activity should be illegal. It is foolish to believe that we can legislate consensual sex.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: