Valentine’s Day: if it isn’t Mutual, it isn’t Worth it

by W.F. Price on February 14, 2012

Valentine’s Day may be one of those manufactured celebrations cooked up by advertisers, but it has become a cultural reality nonetheless, and it can be a nice way for couples to show their appreciation for each other. However, in recent years people have lost sight of the fact that it is supposed to be a day of mutual appreciation, just as love is ideally a mutual feeling. Instead, the holiday has been infected by the princess syndrome, and women have come to feel that it is a special day all for them, and woe to the man who doesn’t put some major effort into making princess feel appreciated on “her” day.

While there’s nothing wrong with women expecting some token of love on Valentine’s Day, men who are in relationships should have every right to expect the same. Unfortunately, too many women see the holiday as a test of how much their man appreciates them, and rather than put some effort into doing something sweet, they sit back and judge the man for his effort and performance in pleasing them alone. This makes the holiday little more than another chore for most men, who know that although they cannot expect anything, they will have more work to do than usual come February 14th.

It doesn’t have to be this way. What men can and should do is ask, nice and reasonable, whether they will get anything for Valentine’s day. In most cases, I think wives and girlfriends will think about it and make some effort to please the man. If, however, she refuses and says something along the lines of “that’s your job,” then the man shouldn’t put any effort into the holiday at all. Don’t make any plans, don’t try to pamper her, and don’t waste time or money. Additionally, start thinking about getting another woman. A selfish attitude concerning love on love’s holiday is a very bad sign.

So, those who have women in their lives should think about what they deserve for Valentine’s Day, and not be ashamed to ask for it. The only way men and women in our society are going to come to terms with each other is if they learn to return each other’s favors. Men in the West have this down pretty well, but our women could use a reminder, and that’s up to us.

Readers out there with women in their lives should put this into practice today. They might find that, rather than offended, their women will be pleased and stimulated by the request, and their Valentine’s Day will be far more pleasant than it would have been otherwise.

{ 65 comments… read them below or add one }

Cab Collins February 14, 2012 at 09:08

Valentine’s day is just another day to me.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 58 Thumb down 2
Raj February 14, 2012 at 09:43

Valentine’s day. Another “buy me” day like Birthday and Christmas, but it doesn’t have to be that way.

Give your sweetheart a red rose and a card, anything more and you are trying to buy her and you know it. If she asks for more, she is not a good woman and your money and more importantly time is best saved (diminishing returns and all). The problem solves itself and a win-win for all.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 4
Rebel February 14, 2012 at 09:45

I may be full of it, but for some reason, I believe in evolution.

Some 3 billion years ago, Nature invented sexual resproduction which allows for a greater diversity in life forms.

What does that have to do with V day?

Well, the point I want to make is that sex exists for reproduction and that’s all it is for.
From that finding, I conclude that men and women were not conceived to live together, as couples.
Not anymore than dogs, who meet for copulation and then go their separate ways.
If evolution corresponds to reality, then we are animals. Few animals live as couples (many birds do) but the only reason they do is to give their offsprings the protection young birds need.
Humans do not fall into that category: humans are the most successful species on earth and for that reason, they represent a deadly threat to the biosphere.

My conclusion is that Valentine day is pure bullshit and exists only for pecuniary gains.

I will take it one more level down: humans were designed to mate a few times in their lifetimes and then go their own way. The MGTOW philosophy is not only a means of self-defense for the human male, but it is what was intended by Nature at the very onset.

Happy Valentine day to all…LOL!!!


Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 37 Thumb down 26
scatmaster February 14, 2012 at 09:54

Emotional Blackmail Day:

Have at it

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 3
Snark February 14, 2012 at 10:22

@ scatmaster

lol’d hard.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 3
Lyn87 February 14, 2012 at 10:25


I read an interesting opinion today that addressed the same topic. If humans met to mate and then separated, the default upbringing for all children would be “Raised by Single Mother.”

That would be a disaster that would result in a de facto matriarchy even worse than the one that dominates our ghettos (and is creeping up the income scale) now. Daniel Amneus does a great job explaining this for those willing to read 362 pages at It’s actually a fairly quick read despite the page length.

If a foreign power caused as much damage as widespread single motherhood does we would rightly consider it an act of war.

To paraphrase the other writer: think of human children as going through two distinct stages of gestation – physical and social, albeit with a period of overlap in infancy. The woman, being the bearer of the uterus, gestates the child from fertilization through birth. At that point the child begins the social gestation that will turn him/her into a productive member of civilization, which is primary suited to men as the builders of that civilization. Just as men have a supporting biological role in pregnancy, women have a role to play in the upbringing (socialization) of children; but like men’s role in pregnancy, it is also a supporting role. The numbers don’t lie: the average single mother is about as adept at raising productive members of society as the average man is at giving birth.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 67 Thumb down 4
Poiuyt February 14, 2012 at 10:33

On behalf of women, owed and entitled to valentines, the sexist-police-state sanctions plunder, rapine and murder of men and of children pursuant to its repugnant social policies. How can mutual appreciation exist in such environments of one sided self love of all things female ?

In such a state of extracted obligation and responsibility by one side of partnerships for the undue benefit of the other side, there can only be hatred, contempt, jealousy, indifference, cruelty, maliciousness and spite.

Relationships are no longer mutual, voluntary nor free in gendertopia. They come with such attatchments and baggage by outsiders to it, as to effectively be man-traps. Why would any man willingly expose himself or even his kids to expropriation, torture or even death ?

Gendertopias caste of sexual aggrieviance hacks lack the natural human feelings of kinship or sincerity. And their poison has spread because of this, meaning everything moral and material is to be appropriated for the woman, only for the woman and no one else but the woman. There now isn’t anyone left amongst men, women or the pawned, bartered and pledged children cappable of knowing genuine love.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 4
Aharon February 14, 2012 at 10:49

If modern womyn and modern society had any depth, objectivity, intelligence, and sensitivity (both group are lacking) they would try their best to make V-Day a celebration day to honor and show appreciation to men and boys. I suspect that most men will pick-up on what I wrote in the prior sentence yet I suspect most womyn won’t be able too.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 5
td9red February 14, 2012 at 10:55

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 36
orecret February 14, 2012 at 11:06

Behold! And Lament! the annual massacre on Valentine’s Day

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Thos. February 14, 2012 at 11:22

Don’t forget that one month after St-Valentine’s Day is a holiday meant for the appreciation of men…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 2
keyster February 14, 2012 at 11:49

Women can’t reciprocate in kind.

A man doesn’t want:
Dinner at a tony resturaunt

He’ll want a sexual favor of some sort as a symbol of her love for him. Something she normally doesn’t do (because she gets no pleasure from it), that he really enjoys. Either that or something practical like new tires for his truck or sporting gear. But they never do that either.

This is a Woman’s Day for validating romantic intention from the man, whether he wants to or not. It’s his reminder that the pedestal established early on still exists, and that ultimately he’s subserviant to the expectation that her happiness and contentment is assured.

She has no obligation, other than to acknowledge and appreciate his thoughtfulness by permitting standard vaginal acccess on what’s typically an off night. She’ll feel the “balance of power” has been reinstated and he’ll be grateful she tolerates him.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 45 Thumb down 12
dragnet February 14, 2012 at 11:53

Been loving the content on this site lately…but this post is a bit of weak sauce.

Valentine’s day? Shouldn’t even register.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 16
Steve_85 February 14, 2012 at 12:01

Love it! I about wet myself laughing at that. Best idea EVER!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Aharon February 14, 2012 at 12:04

“Steak and Blowjob Day”


That is fantastic! I’m going to go post it up on one the most trafficked pro gun blogs. Great find and thanks for posting it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 2
Common Monster February 14, 2012 at 12:13

Want a laugh? Check out the wackiness at Occupy Valentine’s Day while considering how women control the economy of Eros and are thus The 1%…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Common Monster February 14, 2012 at 12:16

Want a laugh? Check out the wackiness at Occupy Valentine’s Day while considering how women control the economy of Eros and are thus The 1%…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
wobbegong February 14, 2012 at 12:20

A pox on Valentines Day!!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Bohemian Rockstar February 14, 2012 at 12:31

I told my partner that as an anarchist I boycott valentines day as I hate being told by the state to show my love.

She said that was cool.

But, I got her a card, a nice book and I had a take out meal at home with candles.

She got me roses, a card and a gift.

No woman has ever given me flowers on v day. And this anarchist was impressed.

If it’s mutual and under control, it’s cool, but if a woman cannot see that it’s reciprocal…..then just say you boycott it.

Great post.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 5
ahamkara February 14, 2012 at 12:33

I saw that goofy cartoon on Google’s web site today, which shows a boy running around like a chicken with his head cut off trying to get a girl’s attention. In my mind I pictured an MGTOW version of the cartoon, where the boy just walks through the frame and the cartoon’s over. It made me laugh.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 2
doclove February 14, 2012 at 13:12

Christian Catholic Pope Gelasius 1(492-96 A.D.) removed the preceding ancient Roman(Italain) holiday called Lupercalia, and I believe he put St. Valentine’s Day in to replace it in honor of the ancient Roman(Italian) Saint and martyr St. Valentinus who was born and died in Italy near Rome. Lupercalia had naked men run and whip women with soft whips made of goat skins. Women lined up to be whipped for good luck getting married if they were single, and good fertility especially healthy and as painless of pregnancy as possible if they were married. It was a cleaning out the dirt from winter and fertility festival for the Ancient Romans or Ancient Italians on 13-15 February.

Japan and South Korea have women especially girlfriends(or wives) giving men especially boyfriends(or husbands) gifts on St. Valentine’s Day. Men especially boyfriends(or husbands) give presents to women especially girfriends(or wives) on White Day which is 14 March. These holidays are even more recent then what we have in the West especially Valentine’s Day.

I’d prefer a more similar setup like the Japanese and South Koreans have the most. However, I would even prefer to revive the Ancient Roman holiday of Lupercalia. Either way, it’s better for men. Maybe we men could recieve gifts on or near the Martin Luther King(MLK) Holiday. The poor as well as the rich like being treated well, menas well as women like being treated well, and people of all races like being treated well. The poor are more in need of being treated well than the rich as they always were in the past. Men are more in need of being treated well these days than women unlike the past. Gentile Whites are more in need of being treated well than anyone else unlike the past. I fully understand life can be no fun as a black man and to a lesser extent a Latino man or Native American Indian man or Pacific Islander man, and so they should be treated well too. Men these days in developed 1st world nations especially the West and very especially in the USA are more oppressed than women on average. I hope all of you will take this in stride what I’m going to say next because I consider it humorous. When women give men happy(sexual) endings or something else men want on the MLK Holiday, I’ll say by repeating what MLK said with a humorous twist”Free at last, free at last, Thank God Almighty, (My man seed is free at last) I’m free at last.” I say if women want something for Valentine’s Day, we men should get something for MLK Day.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 2
Rebel February 14, 2012 at 13:18


I understand your point of view: you are expatiating from the point of view of keeping civilization alive.

I keep in mind that women have made it clear (and especially feminists- meaning almost all of them) that they are not interested in the least in keeping civilization alive.

A return to the Stone Age, in such case, is unavoidable.

As men, I think we can welcome that, since it will exact much less from us.

In my mind, I have already accepted a return to a more primitive life with no income tax, no IRS, no government that breathes over your shoulders and no obligation whatsoever.

Also, remember that MEN invented civilization for the sake of women. Now, since women no longer want the niceties offered by civilization, why bother?


I’m all for taking it easy.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 3
Joe Zamboni February 14, 2012 at 13:23

Just for the hell of it, a few days ago I stopped in at the local flower shop. It was Sunday, a few days before Valentine’s Day. I asked the owner in how many instances are flowers bought by women for Valentine’s Day intended for men? He said “less than 1%,” and I suspect he was being politically correct, because his wife was within hearing distance. Granted, in some cases women may buy flowers for other women, if they are lesbians, but this statistic does not address that small portion of the population. The easy conclusion that this questioner reached: Valentine’s Day is now viewed as just another entitlement of females in America today. By no stretch of the imagination does the holiday involve a mutual giving.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 2
Anonymous Reader February 14, 2012 at 13:36

If a foreign power caused as much damage as widespread single motherhood does we would rightly consider it an act of war.

Yup. And if a communicable disease caused as much damage, finding a cure and vaccine would be the top priority of the medical world – maybe even the Susan G. Koman foundation would support it.

And if some pollutant from industry caused as much damage, controlling the pollution and finding substitutes would be top priority at major corporation and university research laboratories.

It’s almost as if, to the upper class twits, it just does not matter…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 2
Uncle Elmer February 14, 2012 at 13:40

OK Price, to show you how to use “social media ” to generate Spearhead “buzz”, I put Elmer’s Valentine Day essay in your mailbox. This one is gonna go “viral”.

Once it hits Google News , Twitter will “explode” with commentary.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Aharon February 14, 2012 at 14:09

I just saw the list below posted on one of the pro gun blogs.

Top Ten Reasons Men Prefer Guns to Women

#10 – You can trade an old 44 for a new 22.

#9 – You can keep one gun at home and have another for when you’re on the road.

#8 – If you admire a friend’s gun and tell him so, he will probably let you try it out a few times.

#7 – Your primary gun doesn’t mind if you keep another gun for a backup.

#6 – Your gun will stay with you even if you run out of ammo.

#5 – A gun doesn’t take up a lot of closet space.

#4 – Guns function normally every day of the month.

#3 – A gun doesn’t ask, “Do these new grips make me look fat?”

#2 – A gun doesn’t mind if you go to sleep after you use it.

And the number one reason why men prefer guns to women…

#1 – You can buy a silencer for a gun

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 43 Thumb down 6
Anon February 14, 2012 at 15:38

I’ll read her a romantic poem while she blows me.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 5
MyLate40's February 14, 2012 at 15:46

Fortunately I have a girlfriend who likes lingerie, so regardless we will both win. But mostly me. Very well-written and pointed essay, once again.

And Aharon, ain’t it the truth? Happiness is a warm gun.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 5
Rebel February 14, 2012 at 16:04
RhettOrician February 14, 2012 at 16:08

Actually, what I’m seeing this year are women I know throwing cold water on Valentine’s Day, calling it “commercialized,” and “enforced romance.”

Here’s how it works:
- When men paid alimony and women didn’t, alimony was unlimited.
- Now that women are paying, they want alimony strictly limited.

-When only men paid for engagement rings, it was “bigger is better.”
- Now that women are also paying, it’s “let’s have simple bands.”

- When men bought dinner, it was “let’s go out”
- Now that women are supposed to pay, it’s “let’s just hook up, and no, I don’t cook.”

- When only men paid for Valentine’s presents, it was candy, flowers, jewelry, dinner out, etc.
- Now that women are expected to buy gifts for their men (of a value based on their income), well, Valentine’s day is just passe, commercialized, and unimportant.

See the pattern?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 3
Highwasp February 14, 2012 at 16:34

Just went for a walk around small town northern california (with 5 lb ankle weights each foot) and I noticed the couples walking hand in hand going to dinner. Oh yeah it’s VDay. I noticed the women who were coupled all seemed to be wearing red… Red skirts on some, jackets on others, red sweaters here, socks or leggings there. It appeared as though the women who were being taken to dinner weren’t satisfied without also advertising a status signal to let everyone know – I got mine. So what about all those poor girls with no dates…? more and more of them every day – – how insensitive and offensive of those women who have dates on VDay and wear red to brag about it. There ought to be a law…

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 5
tiredofitall February 14, 2012 at 16:41

Back in the bad old days when I still worked in an office job the most entertaining day of the year was always Feb 14th.

Me and a bunch of guys would watch as flowers/gifts got delivered to the ladies at work, and enjoy seeing the look of catty jealousy on the faces of the ones who got nothing.

It was glorious. Especially the one year a coworker got busted sending a shitload of stuff to herself in her boyfriend’s name. She’d have gotten away with it if he hadn’t paid a visit to the office to surprise her in person with his actual V-day gift, and asked who sent her all the various trinkets on her desk.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 2
Eric February 14, 2012 at 17:17

Earlier, I was waiting at a bus stop near some restaurants and saw, in 20 minutes’ time, 9 couples going out to ‘V-Day’ dinner. The women were dressed up, hair done, &c.—and in 8 of those cases were dragging along some piece of human waste who looked like he hadn’t been near either a bathtub or a jobsite in months!

It’s amazing how little sense of shame these bitches have to be seen with these louts and thugs. Of course, none of them would ever dream of being seen in public with some respectable-looking guy.

Just as an aside, the 9th couple I saw was a tall, handsome, clean-cut, well-dressed looking guy who had an aura of confidence and intelligence about him. And the woman with him was Asian! LOL

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 4
Eric February 14, 2012 at 17:28

I once heard somebody laughing over men purchasing so-called ‘Real Dolls’ (the life-like semi-androids being developed). “Why would men want one of those when there are real women!” he chuckled. “What a bunch of losers!”

So I went to one of the manufacturer’s websites through a link on a MGTOW page, and asked him to show me one respect in which real women were an improvement over real dolls. He eventually quit in frustration and slinked away on some pretense LOL!

As soon as those MGTOW techies can imbue these dolls with artificial intelligence, artificial wombs, and motility—western women really may be aiming at the social curve to complete cultural irrelevance. Already, they can’t compete with foreign women at all— in the US, the marriages between American men and foreign women has been climbing for 30 years: only our draconian immigration laws have kept those numbers as low as they are.

Who knows? Maybe technology will make V-Day enjoyable for heterosexual men again someday!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 4
Rocco February 14, 2012 at 17:30

@ Rebel

Well the feminists don’t like Valentines day any more than we do, they renamed it Vagina Monologue day…, who’s keeping it going…..the Velvet Feminists it seems, all those women in red at the restaurant.

As you know I can’t write well so I took writing courses in college and one assignment was to describe the traits you want in a mate. I was full of “englishy” stuff so I decided to make an analogy between the traits my boyhood dog had and the woman I was looking for.

My college roomates father was a writer for Forbes and read it and his head exploded, and this was 1982, and he said you can never compare a woman to an animal….you’ll fail in your grade.

I love my dog, she’s a 3 year old golden retriever.

I think I’ll give her a few extra bacon treats tonight and rename the holiday Valentives for my loving pet dog or VD day.

I agree Rebel. Men and women were not meant to live together. Most older cultures know this. Europe was thrust into feminization in the reformation by Martin Luther it seems in my research. The idea that men should cease living for themselves but take on a woman as a commandment from god.

The Catholic church was no fan of marriage and warned married men about the risks posed by their lustful wives. I’ve seen the paintings from the time.

The Moslums don’t allow it and when men retired in Japan and came home, their wives flipped, now their children won’t associate with women.

MGTOW is as natural as a group of guys going hunting because their hungry or sitting around a fire and talking about the problems of the tribe, as we are doing here, quite effectively without the help of women.

Our job is to undue the 100 years of programing boys recieved from their mothers. Since their have way there from the abuse the saw at home and how their dad’s were treated, a slight push is all they need.

I recommend to young men, if you want p@ssy, travel and learn what it is really like. A few hundred dollars goes a long way in many countries.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 6
Uncle Elmer February 14, 2012 at 17:31

“Especially the one year a coworker got busted sending a shitload of stuff to herself in her boyfriend’s name”


Reminds me of the Army. Nobody sent me letters in basic training but all the other chumps got letters every day during “mail call”. Eventually I realized some of the guys were sending letters to themselves from fictitious girlfriends.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Rocco February 14, 2012 at 17:35


Ron Paul on VAWA:!

Romney on VAWA:

I think it’s clear the Romney is no friend to men, a vote for Ron Paul is a vote to change the status quo.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 3
billy williams February 14, 2012 at 18:01

Valentine’s day is sexist bullshit!-I’m pulling a Liz Lemon & watching a movie… ALONE!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
thesecond February 14, 2012 at 18:22

It’s good knowing game. My female partner bought me flowers, a card, cooked me food, and got herself lubed up for me, and I just bought the movie. It’s good to know that you yourself are enough for them.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 5
Rocco February 14, 2012 at 18:24

@ billy williams

Last night I saw that Liz Lemon got flowers, by accident then flirted with another womans boyfriend when he went to investigate….when he said he had a girlfriend she tried harder.

Liz was a feminist for V day.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
Rocco February 14, 2012 at 18:28


It looks like Hugo Schwyzerdich is getting reamed by the feminists at the Atlantic:
Check out how in the Seneca falls meetin of feminists in 1848 men attended but were not allowed to speak. And how the women in the Atlantic still see no reason to have any man comment at all on feminism.

oddsock is completely correct…..women have no place in the MRM, learn some history guys.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 4
billy williams February 14, 2012 at 18:37

Wow i didn’t see that one, I was talking about an earlier one. She was a feminist for VDay? Never mind then.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Rebel February 14, 2012 at 18:43

@Bohemian Rockstar

” And this anarchist was impressed.”

Hi, bro.
This anarchist is impressed as well.


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Attila February 14, 2012 at 19:14

If you can’t give unconditionally, don’t give at all — otherwise, it’s just a trade/business.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4
JeremiahMRA February 14, 2012 at 19:36

The gift transformed into a debt.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
JeremiahMRA February 14, 2012 at 19:39

I was going to take my gal to KFC for VD but she was acting cranky for no reason so I cancelled it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 1
Anonymous Reader February 14, 2012 at 20:01

Rocco, some of teh wimmenz over at the Good Mangina Project are upset by that. Reminding them that the laws being used to ream Hugo are laws that they wanted doesn’t make them feel any better for some reason or other.

So clearly more of us need to pop up at the Mangina Project to point out the truth…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Anonymous Reader February 14, 2012 at 20:41

Rocco, I read that entire thread at Atlantic. So there’s 10 minutes of my life gone I can’t get back. Anyway, it is obvious why the feministas want men to be seen but not heard in their gurls klub – someone needs to provide the muscle to White Knight other men into line, but let’s face it, slavemistresses do not want to actually hear from their livestock.

And that is what we are to the feminists – animals. Nothing more.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 1
Boxer February 14, 2012 at 22:51

I saw two women tonight and got all sorts of cool stuff — books, candy, and one of them took me to dinner. I did buy cards for a few people. That’s it.

For a couple of years I was in what I thought was a serious relationship. Valentine’s Day was a day to grovel back then, and be disappointed. It’s much nicer being the aloof single guy…

Regards, Boxer

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 5
Rocco February 14, 2012 at 22:53

@ Anon Reader

My point and the point of the article is that you can’t have men leading a womans movement, women leading a mens movement, labor movements lead by management.

That’s the nature of politics. I am always surprised at how people don’t want to be confrontational in a system of checks and balances with confrontation is the lynch pin of the system.

Women knew this in 1848 at the start of The Organized Feminist Matriarchy ™ in Seneca Falls.

When will men learn it, because if you don’t we won’t even get to the negotiating table.

The MRM will be derailed by men pretending to help men but are actually enthralled to women…..mangina’s.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 2
fondueguy February 14, 2012 at 22:58


“He’ll want a sexual favor of some sort as a symbol of her love for him. Something she normally doesn’t do (because she gets no pleasure from it), that he really enjoys.”

Don’t give her sex and affection and see what happens…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
fondueguy February 14, 2012 at 23:09


I know exactly what your talking about.

A friend on Facebook had said that she was very lucky and that her boyfriend makes her feel great. Then some other girl asked “what did he do”. My friend just laughed at her for asking a question like that. But the other girl still couldn’t even understand why so clarified her question, “what did he do for you”.

It’s pretty gross how that other girl can’t even understand the difference between liking a guy and liking what he does for her.

But major props to my friend for calling her out!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
fondueguy February 14, 2012 at 23:12

” If you can’t give unconditionally, don’t give at all —otherwise, it’s just a trade/business.”

But would you give her the opportunity to be generous?

Or would you force an angelic image on her as many guys do.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3
MRA February 14, 2012 at 23:15


My latest article on jezebel promoting teen pornography, thanks to for so mush help.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Rocco February 14, 2012 at 23:17

And withing one week, by next Tuesday it will be like it never happened.

As the sage philosphett Janet Jackson opined: “What have you done for me lately?”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
A.D. February 15, 2012 at 04:08

V-day in Japan:
Chick buys guy chocolate.

White day:
Guy buys chick some cookies/chocolates.


Black Day (Korea):

Eat jajangmyeon (white noodles w/ black sauce)
cos’ you’re a loser and didn’t anything on V-day, or
give anything on White day.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Common Monster February 15, 2012 at 07:27

Speaking of Mz Lemon… did anybody else see the Tuna Fey starring appearance in a hair color ad go by? I think it was during one of the morning fem-news shows. In places it’s like the opening of a sexy secretary/teacher/librarian porn video.

Otherwise, I was going to note the difference between V-Day and BJ+steak day: one is meant to be taken seriously (or at least the woman’s specific requirements are), whereas the other is clearly a joke.

If this is “patriarchy”, I think I’ll take something else.

The Prez was shown giving his insipid advice to men yesterday on how to handle this and the missus. I’m sure they won’t be checking back with him in a month to ask if he even got his steak.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Uncle Elmer February 15, 2012 at 07:59

Another day, another ForbesWoman essay :

Why Can’t Today’s Bosses — and Presidents — Be as Strong as Steve Jobs Was?

Elmer shares his timeless wisdom :

elmer 1 minute ago

The onslaught of workplace feminization is the main reason today’s “leaders” are weak and ineffective. No branch of Encorpera tolerates bold, decisive men such as Steve Jobs because their risk-taking approach unnerves the corporate hens, who will quickly move to get them eliminated.

As females have criminalized masculine behavior and expunged it from schools and corporate life, the only “leaders” who emerge are bland men who forever take women’s alleged feelings into account when making decisions. Thus nothing useful gets accomplished.

When an organization becomes feminized, focus shifts from the efficient production of goods and service to the creation of rules for the comfort and security of women. Ossification and death are inevitable.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Rocco February 15, 2012 at 08:10


The latest on Halle Berry. Remember, she insisted on picking the nanny that watched the kids. FYI, my ex did the same thing, one of the things my ex was most pissed off about was that, one and a half years into our seperation, the nanny thought I was the better parent.

Here is the statement from her fool ATM sperm donor:

Reports say that DCFS is concerned about Nahla while she is with her father, but our source says this is simply NOT the case.

“DCFS has found no signs of physical or verbal abuse regarding Gabriel. They just want the judge to formally order Aubry to attend parenting classes with Halle and take the anger management classes. He has been resisting that because he feels like he has been railroaded unfairly. Gabriel wants the nanny to be held accountable for lying because he says he never even touched her,” the insider says.

And the sweet and beautiful (I puked up in my mouth alittle) Ms. Berry:

“Gabriel Aubry has been accessed of multiple incidents of child neglect and endangerment … and one of the accusers is 3-year-old Nahla, TMZ has learned.

Sources tell us the L.A. Department of Children and Family Services conducted numerous interviews with people familiar with the relationship between Gabriel, Halle Berry and Nahla. We’re told DCFS now has numerous incidents that have raised concerns about Gabriel’s ability to properly parent his child.

We’re told DCFS conducted an interview with Nahla, who talked about her father and described incidents involving him screaming at her — and how it made her extremely frightened.

Our sources say DCFS has information about Gabriel yanking the child out of the nanny’s hand, allegedly pushing the nanny while holding the child, and putting the child in harm’s way while Halle was shooting movie in Europe.

As TMZ previously reported, the Dependency Court ordered that Gabriel can only have contact with his daughter in the presence of a monitor to ensure the safety of Nahla. But we’re told that is just the beginning … there will be numerous other hearings, as well as additional requirements that Gabriel must fulfill, which will include various forms of counseling.

As we reported earlier, Gabriel agreed to anger management counseling … but we’re told the Dependency Court will order more than that.

Just a note … Dependency Court is different from the family court where Garbiel and Halle have been frequent visitors over the past year. Dependency Court is designed specifically to protect a child when there are signs of neglect or abuse. Being hauled into Dependency Court is far more serious than a family law skirmish. ”

Right out of the feminist play book, text book really.

This to me shows that I am not getting the message out. That men don’t know that this can happen to them, that they would agree to have a spy in their house.

Maybe your mother…..if you could trust her, I love my mom, but I she’s a feminist and I couldn’t trust her here, she still thinks my son should have gone with his mom from day 1 and I and my son had no right to a relationship.

Because my mother, his grandmother is a woman.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
W.F. Price February 15, 2012 at 11:07

Black Day (Korea):

Eat jajangmyeon (white noodles w/ black sauce)
cos’ you’re a loser and didn’t anything on V-day, or
give anything on White day.


Hey, I really like jajangmyeon, or zhajiangmian as I knew it in BJ. Sounds like the single Koreans don’t have it so bad.

JFinn February 15, 2012 at 11:55

I don’t believe in “mutual interests.” Love is a 2-way sacrifice. Vaginatine’s day should be all about the woman, while March 14th(Steak And A BJ day) should be about the man. I’m on strike until SAABJD turns national.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
meistergedanken February 15, 2012 at 11:58

Ohio woman tries to stab boyfriend after not receiving expected V-day present:

Yikes. The sistas be crazy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Common Monster February 15, 2012 at 16:23

In response to Aharon’s post “Top Ten Reasons Men Prefer Guns to Women”, I give you cars (from my scrap notes file)…

“There’s a lot of beautiful women out there, but so many of them are like damaged goods… it’s like going to a garage sale for a car these days. You want something that’s reliable and going to hold up or at least give some good weekend cruises, but usually all you end up with is someone’s broken hand-me-down.” – Dreaming

Cars are loyal. Women are not loyal. A car understands the vows of matrimony… Till death do us part, for better or for worse, for richer or poorer, for sicker or healthier.

A car understands that. But a woman does not understand that. A car is ready when we are, as to where a woman is not ever ready. A car has financial demands, but take note the car gives back what is put into it. A woman never puts back what is put in.

A car is dependable, a woman is not. A car never loses its figure or gets fat. A woman loses her figure and gets fat. This is why a man knows that his real love and devotion comes from his car or cars.

My loyal car was so understanding, and loving it drove me to divorce that freak I was married to, and the car was still so pretty when we got home and is still loyal. We, me and my car, live happily ever after.

And let no man or tramp put asunder what I have joined with my machine and my heart.
– Earl356


Also, this was interesting… Today’s Humans Ready to Love Tomorrow’s Robots:

The possibility of human-robot marriage in 50 years was also the subject of government studies in South Korea and the U.K. “I think it’s crazy, but it is interesting that some people take this seriously,” MacDorman said. He added that building “androids that perform sex” will still prove much easier than building “androids that engage in intelligent conversation.”

We keep telling women that, but they just don’t seem capable of comprehending.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
MRA February 15, 2012 at 20:20
Art Vandelay February 17, 2012 at 05:44

The possibility of human-robot marriage in 50 years was also the subject of government studies in South Korea and the U.K.

Why the fuck would anyone marry a robot? This is so insane that those old geezers in the government still think in those terms… You can’t bang that machine willy nilly, you first have to make an honest robot out of her? On the other hand I’d marry a cardboard box if I could get tax benefits.

Of course you’ll be called a creep by your female contemporates nonetheless while they celebrate their dildos and vibrators and assorted sex toys.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: