I’ve been writing a bit about how brutal our regime is in regards to fathers, and how it’s the kind of information that ought to be spread around so that young men know what can happen to them. It seems that the reality is starting to make its way out there, somehow or the other. However, I’ve noticed some hysterical resistance on the part of women, who have been leaving some pretty ruthless comments on the site recently. I haven’t published all of them, because as a divorced father myself I’m not sure I want to contribute to other men’s pain and anger. But maybe that’s a mistake. Maybe it’s best for us to simply see this hatred and contempt for men’s lives unfiltered.
Here’s an example from some bitch calling herself “EC”:
This article makes a very poor attempt to represent that “one decent” man that was ruin by that “less than stellar character” of a woman. My guess is they hope that more of these “decent men” would crawl out of their caves and bellow in unison whatever incoherent motto they represent. I dont know who IS this ‘decent man’. HOWEVER, the majority of men contribute to the “lone man’s shame” in that the majority represent the same ‘character flaw(s).’ They make promises that they do not intend to keep and eventually leave the home. A man who decides to leave his wife not only abandons the woman but his own kids as well. AND this is the reason for the so called “parole officer” because any man who can abandon his children is in fact a moral criminal. That is where the shame is born. Where, I ask, do those men who abandon their own children go? They would save face if they instead went back to their ‘caves’ to think this thru. But they Instead abandon their children to go and live with another woman in a similar situation. I’ve no problem with a man pursuing his happiness if he aint got it with his kids’ mother. But to go and live with another set of kids other than your own and contribute to those kids’ well being (because you can possibly contribute to your own at the same time) while your own kids are being deprived of their right to the man who helped conceive them. Then I guess those very very “less than stellar character” flaws warrants policing. How many of us felt the feeling of dread at our father’s departure? Wanting to run up to them and say, “hey Dad please dont leave. I’ll be good. Just you wait and see, I’ll make you proud of me.” How many of these “decent man” hang around after that or even come back knowing that their own kid(s) are waiting for their return. So to say that all this boils down to is the “vindictiveness of the women” or that women are scheming with the system for financial gains is just truly an insult. These men ignore the reality of a real “brutal, inhuman system” and refuse to see what we as women are left to deal with, and see and feel and live with the emotional side effects of the kids pain cause by the betrayal of their father and our helplessness in these situations. Dont you think that this may well be the unspoken reason for the “wardens”?!!
This woman leaves out the fact that most divorces are filed by women simply for “unhappiness.” She also suggests that men are abandoning their children. She says women are “helpless.”
She’s a liar. She’s scum. I know these types too well. I avoid them at all costs, because after what I’ve been through I’d be highly agitated if I heard this come out of a woman’s mouth and she were standing right in front of me.
But of course, the truth is that these people have us in a halter. They’ve got our kids, and they know it’s a terrible weakness of men. Men are wired to sacrifice for their children, and the subtext is that if we do anything rash our kids will suffer, and they will. The current regime makes it perfectly clear that children will be punished if a father doesn’t behave according to the wishes of the state. All this talk about “best interests of the child” is little more than a threat. Perhaps the most frightening thing, and all separated fathers are aware of it, is that if you don’t fight for visitation and parental rights on their terms, your son may be beaten and your daughter molested by their mother’s new flame. It’s what keeps social workers in business, after all, so these state agents have a vested interest in keeping fathers on their toes.
This is why Firepower was right in commenting that fathers make lousy warriors. Well, in the current setup at least. If we’re fighting to protect our kids from imminent harm, we are ferocious fanatics, but when they’ve already got our kids as hostages, we’re lower than slaves.
I’m embedding a video from the new Discovery Channel series on men recently sentenced to prison. One man, a tax lawyer, was destroyed financially in a divorce and then after going into arrears sentenced to six months for contempt. he couldn’t afford to pay his alimony and child support, so he’s going to jail for a pretty long time. A childhood friend of mine was busted on federal charges of trafficking cocaine in bulk and did six months (it was fair — he cleaned up and paid his dues), but this guy gets the same simply for being broke. The trashy woman he unwisely married doesn’t give a damn, as usual. Women are harder-hearted than executioners when it comes to the fathers of their children. It’s evolutionarily hard-wired — if they feel an impulse to mate with new cock eliminating the prior man becomes a top priority. They can rationalize his extermination without any difficulty whatsoever, which is why hits on spouses are overwhelmingly contracted by wives. Unfortunately, our own government is all too willing to take on the role these days.
Watch the video and ask yourself whether you still feel any loyalty toward your own government, and whether you still feel like negotiating with feminists:
{ 94 comments… read them below or add one }
{ 1 trackback }