Bankrupt

by Elusive Wapiti on January 8, 2012

Behold the New Year’s Eve fleshcapade in London and other cities across England, as laddettes stumble their way through the evening in a half (or quarter)-dressed stupor. (Note: pictures lifted from here, in the Daily Mail). Used to be, only hookers gussied themselves up in whore’s uniforms. For these sexual capitalist exploiters of lonely or bored men, dressing like this made sense: it (a) readily identified a woman as a purveyor of sex for money, and (b) coaxed a fellow’s mind into thinking about having a romp in the hay by bombarding it with sexual signals so clear and so loud only the blind and stone deaf couldn’t see or hear them. Used to be, other women, “good” girls, who realized that a portion of their value pivoted around virtue, didn’t want to be mistaken for a slut, whose value as a wife was steeply diminished. Yes, they wanted to signal their beauty, but they didn’t want their comeliness to overshadow the other qualities that made her attractive to a potential husband. Not today. “Pretty”, as this authorcalls it, is dead. Enter hotness”:

Young women today do not seem to aspire to pretty, they prefer to be regarded as hot. Hotness is something altogether different. When women want to be hot instead of pretty, they must view themselves in a certain way and consequently men view them differently as well. Pretty is cherished. Hotness, on the other hand, is a commodity. Its value is temporary and must be used. It is a consumable. The merits of hotness over pretty is easy enough to understand, they made an entire musical about it. Who can forget how pretty Olivia Newton John was at the beginning of Grease. Beautiful and innocent. But her desire to be desired leads her to throw away all that is valuable in herself in the vain hopes of getting the attention of a boy. In the process, she destroys her innocence and thus destroys the pretty. What we are left with is hotness. Hotness is a consumable. A consumable that consumes as it is consumed but brings no warmth. Most girls don’t want to be pretty anymore even if they understand what it is. It is ironic that 40 years of women’s liberation has succeeded only in turning women into a commodity. Something to be used up and thrown out.

What happened in Manchester over New Year’s Eve, and repeated in several other cities across England and doubtless here in the States, is what you get when an entire generation of young women, when asked “what else you got?”, look at the empty cupboard of their life, only to realize they had little else to offer. So they double and triple-down on the only attribute of value they have left, cheapening all in a sexual signalling arms race to the bottom. I find it ironic that the greatest SMP advantage to be had is accrued by women who don’t offer themselves up for sale in the sexual meat market, but instead cultivate those eternal qualities of faith, virtue, chastity, fidelity, thrift, industry, integrity, a nurturing nature, and contentment. Sexuality is merely part of the package, not the whole thing, and it is certainly not packaged and traded upon in hopes of attracting the attention of that hot guy who yourself find hot. I found humorous truthiness in thiscomment over at Hot Air:

For me, hot is what happens after pretty strips off. martin.hale on January 1, 2012 at 10:31 AM

Yup. Note the order here: Pretty first, then removal of modesty-enhancing clothing, then comes hot. Something else, too. Hotness is more than signalling. It’s a state of mind. It’s an environment, it’s surroundings, it is a climate of trust and safety and intimacy. It’s not simply just dressing like a streetwalker. For the latter is rude, off-putting, disrespectful, and transparent in its naked attempt to manipulate. In the end, if your response to “what else you got?” is to strip off most of your clothes and parade around   in a bid for male and female attention, you’re in the sort of predicament that no amount of flesh-baring will help.


About the author: EW is a well-trained monkey charged with operating heavier-than-air machinery. His interests outside of being an opinionated rabble-rouser are hunting, working out, motorcycling, spending time with his family, and flying. He is a father to three, a husband to one, and is a sometime contributor here at Spearhead. More of his intolerable drivel is available at the blog The Elusive Wapiti.

{ 95 comments… read them below or add one }

Turbo the drycleaner January 8, 2012 at 05:11

I always thought it was odd that it was considered “empowering” to give away your best bargaining chip for virtually free.

back in the day, the evil patriarchs had to love and provide for a woman to get access to sex. now, the women give it away to men only hours after meeting them.

you sure showed us, feminism!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 117 Thumb down 2
Anon January 8, 2012 at 05:28

I work with many women who aspire to hotness. The bother of their company is only exacerbated by the frantic whirring of their rationalization hamsters. Beware. The old ones (30+) get especially vicious. When they lose physical beauty all that remains is the pussy pass that allows them to be irrational, spiteful, and potentially violent.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 130 Thumb down 6
Philip January 8, 2012 at 05:39

All that boozin and partying is IMO a hangover from WW2
“eat drink and be merry for tomorrow we die” every week end Sheesh.
Just look at the woman’s mags and femail section of the UK news papers to see why the girls want to be sexy and naughty, giggle.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 43 Thumb down 2
Zorro January 8, 2012 at 06:01

Stupid.

Worthless.

Whores.

Ask any anthropologist. Ask any sociologist.

It is the human female who leads society in its change.

Ours are a pack of fucking worthless cunts.

We are supremely fucked. Our women are goddamned whores with no brains at all.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 121 Thumb down 16
JG January 8, 2012 at 06:42

My life’s desire in a picture. To ‘win’ the ‘love and devotion’ of a female so clueless on what real love, who’s as mature as a ninth grader raised by a single mom drug addict but whose aging attractiveness is declining as fast as her long-term relationship value. How can it be possible that these ninth grader wannabes are still single?

/sarcasm off

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 66 Thumb down 3
Anon January 8, 2012 at 06:47

Nasty. Mannish, stocky, flabby.

English women were never known for their beauty, but they made up for it with a reputation of being good wives and mothers. If these girls were Meditteranean I could see some advantage to this display. But what the English girls have done is turn themselves into disgusting mounds of festering ooze.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 79 Thumb down 9
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 07:07

Anon

Nasty. Mannish, stocky, flabby.

“English women were never known for their beauty, but they made up for it with a reputation of being good wives and mothers. If these girls were Meditteranean I could see some advantage to this display. But what the English girls have done is turn themselves into disgusting mounds of festering ooze.”

Yes but the men are stunningly handsome stud muffins and in demand worldwide. I have this info from an excellent source.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 52 Thumb down 17
greyghost January 8, 2012 at 07:10

Those women don’t looked liked oppressed victims of the rape culture to me. Hell, them hoes don’t even look like they have jobs.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 80 Thumb down 2
NWOslave January 8, 2012 at 07:36

Women demand praise for boozing it up and being unable to “keep it in their pants.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 61 Thumb down 3
MT459 January 8, 2012 at 07:49

All those broads were actually pretty hideous except for the blonde on the far right in the first picture.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 8
Lovekraft January 8, 2012 at 08:00

On an evolutionary, survival level, the females acting like this may be simply following their instincts. If the culture ( our current morally-bankrupt one) subliminally sends them the message that this is their only option, then they will act upon it. Thus the sluttiness.

Akin to the theory that ‘law and order’ is tenuous, only waiting for the right conditions to dissolve into hedonism, anarchy etc.

We MRAs should continue to strive for Higher Plateaus, despite the fact that it often seems impossible.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 45 Thumb down 4
B January 8, 2012 at 08:47

Reminds me of when I described a girl as “cute” to a younger guy at a bar; I got the classic “what are you, a fag?” look from him. Enjoy your skank, junior!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 56 Thumb down 3
Raj January 8, 2012 at 08:52

I don’t see the problem here. It’s not that women of older times who dressed modestly were any less of whores.

Actually there hasn’t been a better time to be a man (A smart man). Whores you have to pay, sluts are usually free. Enjoy them.

Women were and always will be only good for two things, sex and childrearing. Everything else is just pretention and wishfull thinking.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 59 Thumb down 36
Massah January 8, 2012 at 09:03

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 69
Aharon January 8, 2012 at 09:05

I found none of the women pictured attractive. The women actually looked bad as in used-up or almost like a street person who has had a hard unhealthy life. Their faces seemed old or just not natural for women that our chronologically young.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 44 Thumb down 4
MT459 January 8, 2012 at 09:06

‘Actually there hasn’t been a better time to be a man (A smart man).’

This is very true. If you have some game and live in an area with attractive young females (colleges, major cities, etc) than you can probably accrue more sexual partners than your previous 10 ancestors.

The problem though is for men who want families/children. At this point marriage is a huge risk for men and divorce is “empowering” for women in our culture. I have a desire to have kids one day, but my desire NOT to be divorced with a good chunk of my paycheck going straight to child support/alimony is much greater.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 72 Thumb down 3
Ryu January 8, 2012 at 09:08

Hold on now. This is supposed to be an advanced MRA site. That black and white distinction is too simplistic.

Women are responsible for their actions. However, men have their part in idealizing the tramp. Those whorish fashions didn’t just pop into existence out of thin air. Women have observed TV, porn, strip clubs and so on.

The PUAs play a role. Take Roosh. Those Polish girls may be pretty and cute. When they have been fucked and chucked enough times, they become hardened. This occurs many times as the PU plus travel crowd (PUT) goes mongering in Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, and South America.

You cannot have your cake and eat it too. That is the overarching lesson of modern PC, MC, liberalism. It’s those tiny inconsistencies multipled a millionfold that produce what you see around you.

Every man here can either choose to be a destroyer of civilizations or a builder. It takes no talent to destroy a house, choose anyone you wish. When you’d like to build one, you hire the best.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 88 Thumb down 22
Avenger January 8, 2012 at 09:17

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 34
BeijaFlor January 8, 2012 at 09:23

What we have here is worse than “the death of pretty,” and I’m sure everyone her knows that. It’s the death of good values in our culture, of “living up to a standard,” of what my 1880′s-born grandmother would have called “being respectable.”

The standards of behavior that our forebears throughout history called “civic virtues” have not merely been lost, they have been cast aside, spurned and scorned by three generations of spoiled brats – starting with my own generation, the Boomers. But nobody ever foresaw this level of fuck-up, did we?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 50 Thumb down 2
Days of Broken Arrows January 8, 2012 at 09:36

I enjoyed these pictures of female impersonators, drag queens and transsexuals.

However, for future posts, could The Spearhead perhaps print some pictures of actual women? Thanks in advance.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 81 Thumb down 3
Jim January 8, 2012 at 09:52

Flies are drawn to shit.

The Fire Rises.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 22 Thumb down 8
Jason Steiner January 8, 2012 at 09:55

I have more of a problem with “ugly” than “pretty” or “hot”. I have never seen so many women who put no effort in their appearence. They are morbidly obese, masculine, wear no makeup, and are dressed in sweats and sneakers. I see more of this than anything. I actually see less “hot” than I did 20 or 30 years ago, unless you count girls going out to the club.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 6
Jimbo January 8, 2012 at 10:05

Its not something people of either sex like to talk about, but, that doesn’t change a certain reality. Men who marry old tramps know what they are getting and so do those women involved. The men just hold there tongues and noses and make the best of it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 3
Avenger January 8, 2012 at 10:11

Men who marry old tramps

Show me any 50 yo man of substance who married an old tramp.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 6
Rocco January 8, 2012 at 10:17

Sir Paul McCartney

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 4
Aharon January 8, 2012 at 10:21

This piece was an interesting read. “It is ironic that 40 years of women’s liberation has succeeded only in turning women into a commodity.” Yes, it’s ironic, sad, and funny too. Many of those young women aspiring to being sexually liberated “like-men” embrace the hot culture. For now. Over time as their faster than normal aging process takes a toll on them they might mellow out some yet many of them are really clueless. On paper, career, income, alimony, child support, government programs, and the emotional cheer leading by society are for women more wide spread and more overt pro-female male-limiting than ever. So, asking sarcastically, why are women increasingly less happy and fulfilled as they age whereas despite all the misandry men are increasingly happy and fulfilled? Eventually the Hot will burn itself out or run out of fuel. The pendulum will swing back towards pretty at some point to an unknown degree though I don’t think it will go to pre-1970 pretty. Too bad since the women who came of age in the 1960s where literally IMO probably the most ‘pretty’ and physically beautiful generation of American women. One thing that is definite, the demographic make-up of America is so changed and the sub groups that are now marrying, staying married to a stronger rate, and having more kids on average will result in a future will still be very different post feminism and post Hot culture. Lastly, it is unsettling to me that most men are not actively aware and still are to various degrees still co-operating with misandrist society. I am simply amazed that some men will still risk marriage, kids, and even living with a woman. The elites, their puppet masters, and their sheeple are doing an incredible job keeping many people in the dark, changing social values, and transforming our political system.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 48 Thumb down 6
Avenger January 8, 2012 at 10:23

The very wealthy one he’s going to marry or peg leg a model 23 years his junior? McCartney was married for a long time to his first wife ad after she died he probably wasn’t in his right mind when he married Mills. Paul is the freaky exception then but the rule is still true.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 5
Coastal January 8, 2012 at 10:34

This is the natural result of feminists spending decades ramming home the point that a relationship with a regular Joe – yes, a beta – is the worst fate that can befall a woman.

Instead, women are encouraged to shoot for the alpha, but with 80% of women going for 20% of men, of course the competition’s going to be frenzied. As the saying goes, you have to be obvious when you’re selling a pig, and there’s no percentage in an HB6 being coy when she’s going for the alpha. She has to offer SEX right up front.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 5
Soapwort McFuggletoes January 8, 2012 at 10:35

Downhill is always easier than uphill, but the easy out usually has a high price. Happens all over – morals, ethics, politics, finance, nutrition, fitness, etc.

In some of these areas, technology softens the blow after the fact. Others, like here with morals expressed through public attire, have only the acceptance of wider society as their dubious consolation prize – while the greater damage remains as posters above already outlined.

I’ve become greatly desensitized to the ‘hot’ parade. Where next? String bikinis as clubbing attire? Will the womenz actually find a line that they collectively won’t cross? One thing I’m sure of: careful reconsideration will only occur in crisis; what a shame it has to go that far.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 0
Rebel January 8, 2012 at 10:43

On the other hand, British women have this great quality about them: they make all other women look divinely beautiful…

Even female chimps look attractive after a trip to England.

Even Izzy…

Oh, nasty me…

lol!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 16
Rapses January 8, 2012 at 10:52

“Young women today do not seem to aspire to pretty, they prefer to be regarded as hot. ”

I personally don’t care whether they are aspiring for “prettiness” or “hotness.” My only concern is what they are offering for free. Guys, make hay while sun shines. These girls will have lot of time to regret as they say work in haste and repent in leisure.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 6
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 10:54

Rebel

Shhhh! Don’t mention Izzy in anything like a negative light. All the white knights from a voice for manginas will rush to her defence again. LMFAO.

How’s the inflatable goat I sent you ?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 20 Thumb down 20
Aharon January 8, 2012 at 10:54

I just posted the comment below at the site linked above (ncregister dot com)in the article. After posting it a notice said their site will first need to review my comment as it might be spam.

Great piece. Thank you. I first read about it at The Spearhead which is a Men’s Rights site.

Someone here wrote: “Actually men play one of the biggest parts in it because they’re taught by instinct to see us as sex obbjects. Sorry.”

— Reality check: Stop blaming men and portraying men as hungry sex-crazed wolves, and women as poor little victim sheep. Women who choose feminism, the gender-raunch culture, and the desire by many modern women to embrace their lower animal nature and to turn away from their higher spiritual nature play parts in this way beyond anything men can possibly do. Most men, especially age 25+, are increasingly disgusted with modern western women. The marriage strike by men keeps increasing and there is increasingly also a dating strike by men. If men were just interested in easy sex those trends would not be occurring. Based on your thinking, you might as well be honest and blame God for creating men with having a strong sex-drive activated through visualization.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 6
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 10:58

Avenger

Hmm. I dont know. John Cleese must be a close second to Paul Mac?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 5
WOW January 8, 2012 at 11:13

Man are British women wood killers!

Hey chickie…eating like shit, smoking, and drinking to oblivion make you ugly.

Drop me an email so I can draw you a map to the gym!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 3
piercedhead January 8, 2012 at 11:23

I think Cleese is worse than Paul Mac.

McCartney hadn’t been robbed and betrayed by a woman before Mills – he at least had an excuse. Cleese has been cleaned up something awful, forced back into working after 3 failed marriages – and now he’s talking about doing it again to some girl young enough to be his grand-daughter.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 1
Rebel January 8, 2012 at 11:28

@Oddsock

“How’s the inflatable goat I sent you ?”

Not working well: size 18 is too small.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 8
Boxer January 8, 2012 at 11:34

Dear Piercedhead:

This is what I don’t get: Why are these multimillionaires who get fucked in the ass in family court and railroaded out of all their money not here, participating in the spearhead, going on marches with Fathers for Justice, and otherwise opening their cowardly yaps?

The only man of means I know with the balls to take even a moderate stance is Alec Baldwin, after his bitch wife alienated him from his little girl.
http://www.stopfatherabuse.org/Alec_Baldwin_Demonstration.html

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 3
Rocco January 8, 2012 at 11:42

@ Pierce

Someone needs to do an inter”dick”tion for Cleese…..for some men living alone is worse then living with a woman….go figure.

There was one nice post that pointed out that human men must have for millions of years hunted together in packs and therefore, comaradre and cooperation are indubetably male traits.

But then he said something about rutting for females which made me think of Cleese.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 11:46

Rebel

@Oddsock

“How’s the inflatable goat I sent you ?”

Not working well: size 18 is too small.

Hmmm Ok big boy, I will see if I can find one with a bit more room for you. Although, are you sure it’s a size 18 ? Maybe the super glue you used instead of the KY Jelly has reduced the openings a tad ?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 7
Avenger January 8, 2012 at 11:51

John Cleese is 72 and prbably n longer gives a damn about money. Even after being raped in a divorce he’s still got plenty. The average man nly lives 72-75 and many are dead befre that age.
And oddsock, the topic was how many men marry old tramps not how many men lose money in divorces or are used by younger females. His last 2 gf’s were 27 and 31 and I don’t believe he’s marrying anyone anyway.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 7
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 11:51

Boxer & Piercedhead

Bob Geldof was doing a great job for Fathers but that seem to stop once he became Sir Bob Geldof. Interesting videos all the same.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZDBOH2Hdz8

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 11:53

Avenger

Old & Tramp are subjective that is why I suggested John Cleese.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 6
Rebel January 8, 2012 at 11:58

@oddsock

KY?
Why?

Tar sand does fine.
Cheap here.
Is it what causes the rasping, screeching sounds?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 12:03

Rebel

Tar Sand ? Ahh, that explains why you are getting so many friction burns and punctures. Change to KY and you will save a fortune on puncture repair kits, not to mention the healing of your extensive burns.

Just curious, what did you tell the doctors at the burns unit ?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 7
keyster January 8, 2012 at 12:05

“The only man of means I know with the balls to take even a moderate stance is Alec Baldwin, after his bitch wife alienated him from his little girl.”

Wouldn’t he be great!?
Unfortunately he’s a feminist.
He’s also a dyed-in-the-wool Hollywood liberal, that depends on an adoring female fan base. He’s bandied about running for office. Do you honestly believe he could run with a “Father’s Rights” platform on a Democratic ticket? I wouldn’t hold my breath.

Oddly his brother Stephen is an avowed social-conservative and activist, but he’s been married to the same woman for 22 years and has two kids. Also, he’s not as good an actor.

It’s when men marry entitled, empowered, independent feminists they get into trouble. Typically these will be “gender equality” minded men.

Besides, wouldn’t you think Alec Baldwin would want HIS daughter to react the same exact way towards HER husband as her mother did to him? It’s a moral dilema he’ll have to confront when the time comes I suppose. My guess is he’d side with princess and support her in giving “that bastard” his due.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 3
Rocco January 8, 2012 at 12:23

But if you want me to go on with the list of distiguished older men that married much younger god diggers, I could go on……forever…..

A big part of the MRM needs to be about protecting mens assests when a Sheala wants to take a bite out of their asses.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4
Newt January 8, 2012 at 12:32

It’s not enough for sluts to be sluts without ridicule since a lot of feminist sluts will actually activity try to make you feel guilty for rejecting them.

a large number of sluts are very deceitful since they lie about there past to avoid rejection.

They even brain washed a little girl into spewing pro slut propaganda.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXH2K7OC37s

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Boxer January 8, 2012 at 12:35

Dear Oddsock:

Fascinating video. I didn’t know about Geldof.

http://framedfathers.blogspot.com/2008/09/alec-baldwin-on-2020-tonight.html

Alec Baldwin has been something of a crusader too… at least in regards to child custody and the like (I’ve never heard him criticise alimony and divorce law itself, though he might have). Out of all the men who have been banged out (most recently: Mel Gibson) none of them has the balls to even speak up in his own defense.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2011/12/mel-gibsons-loses-half-of-his-850-million-fortune-to-ex-wife-in-divorce/

Regards, Boxer

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3
Aharon January 8, 2012 at 12:54

Let’s see: 1) most women are not as good in bed as they think they are (and guys usually don’t have the heart to be honest), 2) many modern women have personalities and values that can be erection killers, 3) the younger ones increasingly can’t cook or if they do it is something you don’t want to eat. Why again do us men need women?

Last night, I cooked an incredible Chicken Paprikash in my inexpensive $30 Lodge cast-iron dutch oven (you don’t need to go out and spend $200 on a friggin cooking pot). It was as delicious as any great restaurant serves the dish. I found the recipe at Simply Recipes dot com. Next time, I’m going to cook it with three types of paprika, a little lemon juice, and use pale ale instead of chicken broth. The simple pleasures in life are often the best. Men are the best cooks.

Time for leftovers before I start my walk :)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 52 Thumb down 7
aussieguy January 8, 2012 at 12:56

Young women today do not seem to aspire to pretty, they prefer to be regarded as hot. Hotness is something altogether different. When women want to be hot instead of pretty, they must view themselves in a certain way and consequently men view them differently as well. Pretty is cherished.

Pretty => Feminine, elegant, etc.
==> Like a rare flower, you want to cherish.

Hot/Sexy => Morally questionable, aggressive, loud, etc.
==> Have adopted male chauvinist behaviours for all the wrong reasons.
(aka: Lad => Ladette.)

Its not that they not aspire to be pretty. Its that some don’t know how to be pretty. Today’s young women are literally bombarded by fashion trends of a questionable character. (The magazines they buy, are run by editors who were feminists in their past. Its why the majority of them are single as they age. I recently saw an interview of them on pay TV. It explains why their advice is most often nonsensical or downright garbage. Their “male opinion” articles are written by approved white knights and manginas.)

Anyway, when you see them grow up in such an environment, you come to realise they’ve being molded into a certain way. They don’t know what feminine and elegance is, unless they pro-actively go to classes that teach such behaviours. (We have a few of these female elegance classes here in Sydney, Australia. I know there are some in the UK, as my friend’s wife took them to change her ways/manner. It was an agreement between them. She used to be “loud and proud”. She’s a whole different person today.)

…Women only take such courses when they know they’ve secured a man of wealth, power, reputation, or status; and don’t want to shame him by her behaviours. Like what the current Crown Princess of Denmark did. She was an Australian citizen who met Crown Prince Frederik in a Sydney pub.
(pub = Its a non-membership bar).
=> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfMZObKeQ1Y

So it really boils down to the woman and if she realises her behaviour isn’t fitting. Most won’t, and continue their path of degradation. This is especially true in the UK. (They have earned quite an international reputation.)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 5
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 13:14

Aharon January 8, 2012 at 12:54

“Let’s see: 1) most women are not as good in bed as they think they are (and guys usually don’t have the heart to be honest), 2) many modern women have personalities and values that can be erection killers, 3) the younger ones increasingly can’t cook or if they do it is something you don’t want to eat. Why again do us men need women?”

Actually Aharon, I was originally going to post something along the same lines.

OK, accepting that 99% of the women in the photo are not the most pretty. Putting that aside for a moment. What we actually have with these women is something that under the trade descriptions act would be classed as misleading or fraudulant. It’s a bit like buying a car that has been given a quick paint job and filled with heavy duty oil. It may look and sound great but once you start to drive it you get the shock of your life. As you say Aharon, todays woman may look the part but she seldom if ever performs in the bedroom.

All in all, being hot ( dressing like a hooker) but not delivering seems to be simply an extension of the female mind set that all she has to do is turn up and everything else is then up to the man e.g entertain amuse feed her etc. They really are a major major anti climax.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 4
oddsock January 8, 2012 at 13:44

Ahh the English Rose. How sweet a lady !

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWP00eDf4Es

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4
Newt January 8, 2012 at 13:47

I can co exist with the sluts no problem if they stopped being lying about there past and actively try to make me feel guilty for being disgusted by them.

I’m not above fooling around with sluts because they can be very entertaining however sluts are often predatory women.

a slut will lie about her past to get a relationship and is much more demanding than a non slut woman.

sluts also copy the behavior of non slut women to avoid rejection making it more difficult to tell them apart.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 2
Rocco January 8, 2012 at 14:37

@ Newt

A slut that doesn’t lie is a prostitute…that’s why I think a necessary MRA plank needs to be legalized regulated prostitution.

It would be a pressure valve for young guys at least.

Maybe Mr. Cleese would be more inclined to leese.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 2
Eincrou January 8, 2012 at 15:00

I feel like Uncle Elmer right now. I left a comment on a Forbes blog post, and I reproduce it here.
The Bizarre Sexism in BioWare’s ‘Star Wars: The Old Republic’

I have no idea what being a female gamer must be like, but I know that girl gamers deal with a lot of sexism from other online players. I also know that games tend to portray women as scantily clad and unrealistically proportioned. Girls get plenty of this from media designed for them. Games just make it worse.

I am sure that E.D. Kain did not get the reaction he was expecting. The two women who have posted here are disagreeing with him, rather than showering him with praises for his courage and strength in helping protect their fragile identities as women.

Kain’s failed attempt at white knighting is more ridiculous than most for the reason that he thinks misogyny is a huge problem in a gaming industry in which 90+% of games have ONLY virtual males as killable characters.

Further, most characters that are supposed to be “paragons” of weakness, sloth and immorality are male. Everybody knows this, especially the women who came here to tell Kain he is wrong.

If women are equal to men, something Kain would no doubt claim to believe, then they are not so weak-willed as avoid video games because women are portrayed in ways that run the whole continuum of human existence.

Men have set a high standard when it comes to accepting and dealing with ubiquitous negative portrayals of males. Kain believes women are not capable of meeting this standard and require saving; as if damsels in distress ripped from the misogynistic fictions he claims to deplore.

I’m glad a few women were willing to tell Kain that they don’t need his heroic services.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 2
Somehow Somewhat January 8, 2012 at 15:37

>> As it stands any MAN who gets married is clinically insane and should use that as a defense.
A comment by “clarity” on a Canadian website: http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/21/you-must-continue-to-pay-alimony-unless-your-financial-situation-drastically-changes-supreme-court/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
Craig Himself January 8, 2012 at 17:13

@Lovekraft:
“On an evolutionary, survival level, the females acting like this may be simply following their instincts. If the culture ( our current morally-bankrupt one) subliminally sends them the message that this is their only option, then they will act upon it. Thus the sluttiness.”

I suspect something similar. In an impending Mad Max oblivion, they’re all clamping for a slot in King Humongous’ harem.

But I also must be full of shit… somehow. Like take Russian women for example. I understand that they went through a brief but intense Slutocalypse after the wall came down, but are now going milder.

It must have something to do with anticipating an impending cataclysm. Cash runs to gold and silver, and unskilled women run to sexy asshole slumlords. Once it’s over, though, as someone put it: In the land of starving sluts, the reserved prude is queen.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
Hf January 8, 2012 at 17:49

What these girls are doing, they are doing for attention.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
Avenger January 8, 2012 at 18:00

Somehow Somewhat January 8, 2012 at 15:37

>> As it stands any MAN who gets married is clinically insane and should use that as a defense

Well you’re quite right. Contracts are void if a party is insane, incompetent or under the influence of certain drugs or is drunk at the time. So if you’re dumb enough to get married be sure you’re drunk at the time of the ceremony so you can use it as grounds for an anullment if you like later on.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Rocco January 8, 2012 at 18:37

Except the men won’t come back…why should we…..now we know the truth about how women feel about men, as the russian men learned….and children….the famous russian orphanages with children damaged from lack of attention or hugs.

No, Anglo men are not as nice as Russian men, they are still afk 70 years after the Russian women broke the social contract.

Don’t expect marriage to return.

And thank your lucky stars.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 5
Avenger January 8, 2012 at 18:57
Rebel January 8, 2012 at 20:03

Rocco January 8, 2012 at 18:37

“Except the men won’t come back…why should we…..now we know the truth about how women feel about men.
Don’t expect marriage to return.”

Whichever way you look at it, marriage is slavery. No word in any language describes marriage more accurately, more precisely than the word “slavery”.

Uncomitted relationship is far better because both partners are free to do whatever they wish to do with their lives.

If marriage doesn’t come back, then the future bodes well for men.

Always, always, always keep in mind that as long as you don’t marry, you can’t divorce (i.e. you can’t get ripped apart).

Another thing to keep in mind, and it is mighty important to do so, is that marriage was NOT, I repeat, NOT invented for YOUR benefit but to put you in slavery, sometimes for life.

My friends, thank God profusely that mariage is dying.

And R.I.P.!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 5
evilwhitemalempire January 8, 2012 at 21:14

Mommy’s baby, Daddy’s maybe.

That was the whole point behind why it was important for females to keep their legs closed before marriage.

Before modern genetics a woman being virtuous was the ONLY insurance policy men had against paternity fraud.

But now things are different.

However it will be necessary to wrest control of this technology from feminist hands before we can reap the benefits.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 1
evilwhitemalempire January 8, 2012 at 21:26

Massah January 8, 2012 at 09:03
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

@ Raj,

Exactly.

You other guys need to lighten up.

If you want a child rearing pack animal that covers up, please move to Afghanistan.

****************

Thing is Afghanistan will likely move here before it’s all over.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 1
andybob January 8, 2012 at 23:18

Finally, someone else who has a problem with the ending of ‘Grease’. It has never made any sense. The reason Danny was attracted to Sandy in the first place was that she was so different from the no-better-than-they-outghta-be skanks in his crowd. What was the point of tarting her up? Sandra Dee was certainly B-list, but where is the shame in that?

Even when I was 12, I could tell it was all going to end in tears, identity crises, gangbangs and smoker’s cough. Hardly something to sing and dance about. And what about her poor parents? I’m not surprised they edited out their reaction. The American school system turned their rosy-cheeked daughter into a whore faster than they could say, “Bondi Beach”. I hope they sued.

“Lighten up”, they said. “It’s only a movie,” they said. After 34 years, I am finally vindicated. Thank you Mr Wapiti.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 69 Thumb down 1
R4M January 9, 2012 at 06:09

With women what you see is what you get. There are no hidden charms not immediately discernable to the human eye. It doesn’t matter how many airs they put on, they’ll never be serious, fair or objective. Only after dispensing with the torturous wish for ‘equality’ can any peace of mind be had. Yes their ass is their chief asset, yes they will try to manipulate as many men as they possibly can with it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
Doc January 9, 2012 at 06:27

This is why there are “women to fuck, and women to marry” – although today marriage is for suckers regardless of the woman being discussed.

(Still the observation is valid, although a lot of the “good” girls are deciding that they have to join the ranks of the sluts to “find a man”. Another one of those wonderful developments which equals “more available tail” which is always a good thing.)

Personally, I’m very thankful for such women – makes it a lot easier to see who I’ll be taking home tonight, and using as much as possible throughout the night, and kicking out in the morning – also shows who I would want to…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 7
oddsock January 9, 2012 at 07:22

However !

Something for us all to read, especially Men !

Nurse Reveals the Top Five Regrets People Have on Their Deathbed

http://www.inspirationandchai.com/Regrets-of-the-Dying.html

And just for the women

Proof at last that Western women are brainwashed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd6MoVF-9Io&feature=player_embedded

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3
sharp January 9, 2012 at 07:36

Andybob: Agree with you about Sandra Dee from Grease. Most men seem to like the innocent, sweet version of her for most of the movie, not the slutted up version at the end. Sure, most wouldn’t throw that one out of bed, but she’s reduced to nothing but pump and dump material, while the sweet Sandra was marriage material (if marriage was still viable).

Eincrou: It’s true, people talk about sexist portrayals of women in video games, and it doesn’t even occur to them, or they simply don’t care, that the cannon fodder in games is 99.9% percent male. I brought this up in a video game forum awhile ago during a discussion about how the recent Duke Nukem game was misogynist, and some of the forum white knights short circuited and didn’t know how to respond. One guy’s (I think it was a guy) response about men being used as cannon fodder in games like Call of Duty:

“Male privilege: The violence in Call of Duty is not gendered. Men commiting acts of violence against men is normalized behavior in entertainment. ”

He actually proved my point but somehow thought he disproved it by throwing in”not gendered”, which sounds like academic gender studies indoctrinated speak. Being seen as disposable cannon fodder is a “privilege”. Haha, you can’t make this shit up.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 1
Blissex January 9, 2012 at 09:15

it was considered “empowering” to give away your best bargaining chip for virtually free.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
perhaps January 9, 2012 at 10:39

I see a previous incomplete comment that attracts my attention:

“it was considered “empowering” to give away your best bargaining chip for virtually free.”

This has two aspects. The minor one is that an interpretation of late-stage feminism is that it is about brother-envy, that is it is about sisters being jealous of the “freedom” (or rather the paternal approval) that they perceive their brothers (or brothers of their friends etc.) have, and wanting to have all the same “privileges” and lots more of course (when I think all they really want is paternal approval).

Consider all the laughable claims that “sisters” should not be stigmatized as “sluts” anymore than their “brothers” who screw around are stigmatized as “sluts” (which forgets that men who screwed around have as a rule been stigmatized as “sluts” and discriminated against by other men and especially by women).

The other is that it is obvious that “give away your best bargaining chip” refers to sexual, that is orifice, access. But that is not the best bargaining chip, it is worthless.

If you as a man think that access to a cock-shaped hole is the “best bargaining chip”, why not become gay and join the “bathhouse” culture? Can’t you just close your eyes and not worry about the gender of the body whose mouth or other sphincter are you using? Many men indeed have indeed reached that conclusion, as that guy said it doubles your chances of a date.

Indeed in the “bathhouse” culture it does not matter (as to identity at least). Thus sexual access is not a “best bargaining chip”, it is worthless because everybody could do anybody else’s holes.

What is really valuable as a “bargaining chip” is not sexual access, it is the use of the womb for reproduction (not even of the female eggs, as those are still abundant for a couple decades, even if less so than sperm).

And it is valuable because it is very costly: it is a resource that carries with it a very heavy use penalty, both during its direct use (40 weeks of complications) and later (18 years of childraising).

Women don’t control access to sex, men do (women want the cock!); but women control access to reproduction, that is the womb. That’s extremely important. Men who don’t get that become extinct. Basically women can kill of a man’s potential progeny.

Men control access instead to both sex and male parental investment and it is the latter that is the real prize: most of stage 2 feminism has been about ensuring that women instead of men control male parental investment (the man-as-wallet logic), using the babies as an excuse.

The reason why the ladies pictured in the post show off their sexuality so much is because they are sterile by choice (via condoms, the pill, and various types of abortion), and therefore they have nothing of greater value than men to offer, don’t need to secure even the smallest degree of voluntary male parental investment and thus they try to offer loudly their sterile orifices. Which is not too different from “bathhouse” culture gays, who also dress (or not) largely for effect.

Stage 3 feminism is thus about “empowering” sisters to be as sterile as their gay brothers, and equally disposable orifice holders, or more disposable, as they don’t have the cock (but I am told that strapons are at least geometrically a suitable substitute).

And reproduction and its costs lead to this very appropriate observation:

“Mommy’s baby, Daddy’s maybe. That was the whole point behind why it was important for females to keep their legs closed before marriage.”

And that’s the big issue with respect to both women controlling access to reproduction, men

“Before modern genetics a woman being virtuous was the ONLY insurance policy men had against paternity fraud.”

That’s why virginity was so valued at marriage, and firstborn, especially male, were so valued: a virgin bride most most likely to ensure paternity, at least of the firstborn, and the best assurance of paternity of all was a male who closely resembled his father and was a firstborn from a virgin.

“alphas” have always existed, and they have always known that women cheat and cuckold quite frequently. Because bored wives have always been hot for the “bad boy” minstrel, policeman, soldier of fortune, vicar, lord of the manor, … Therefore realistic men have always known that the risk of cuckolding was pretty high, except for the firstborns of demonstrably virgin brides.

Those are the things that really matter, not sex in some random sphincter: the enormous cost of reproduction, male parental investment, increasing the chances of actual paternity.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 4
Ted January 9, 2012 at 11:01

@ oddsock January 9, 2012 at 07:22

Great find, Oddsock.

“2. I wish I didn’t work so hard.
This came from every male patient that I nursed. ”

*Every* one, note.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
Craig Himself January 9, 2012 at 11:22

@oddsock:
Nurse Reveals the Top Five Regrets People Have on Their Deathbed
http://www.inspirationandchai.com/Regrets-of-the-Dying.html

Thanks very much for that hookup, ‘sock!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Relevant January 9, 2012 at 13:31

No talk about cold fusion by Jeremy Rifkin here but interesting all the same:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_Industrial_Revolution

The Third Industrial Revolution is a concept and vision outlined by Jeremy Rifkin and endorsed by the European Parliament, in a formal declaration passed in June 2007 [1].

Throughout history, economic transformations occur when new communication technology converges with new energy systems. The new forms of communication become the medium for organizing and managing the more complex civilizations made possible by the new sources of energy.

The conjoining of internet communication technology and renewable energies in the 21st Century, is giving rise to the Third Industrial Revolution.

The Third Industrial Revolution is based upon 5 Pillars:

1.Shifting to Renewable Energy
2.Converting Buildings into Power Plants [2]
3.Hydrogen and Other Energy Storage Technology
4.Smart Grid Technology
5.Plug in, Electric, Hybrid, and Fuel Cell based Transportation [3]

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4
Nemo January 9, 2012 at 19:53

@ Relevant

G. Harry Stine wrote a book tiled “The Third Industrial Revolution” in 1975. I think that Rifkin borrowed the phrase (to put it nicely) from him.

Stine wanted to colonize outer space and increase our access to resources. Stine helped to make model rocketry into a major hobby for young people in the US.

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=83691

Rifkin is a notorious extreme environmentalist who wants to make the Earth “green”. His Wikipedia article notes that he was once called the “most hated man in science” by Time Magazine.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Rifkin

http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2011-09-27/jeremy-rifkin-third-industrial-revolution

It’s a damn shame that a book written by a MGHOW, Mr. Stine, is out of print but Mr. “Ripoff” Ripken is given credit for stealing his catchphrase and transmogrifying it into something entirely different.

It’s typical of the left that they will steal ideas from others and then rewrite history so that the English language itself is reworked into a “Newspeak”. Feminists love to do this too.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Nemo January 9, 2012 at 20:20

@ Perhaps

This could also explain why “primogeniture” – the custom of giving all of the inheritance and titles of nobility to the first-born son – was invented.

If the first-born is most likely to be the biological child, and later sons are increasingly more likely to be the offspring of another man, then giving all of the resources to the firstborn is a perfectly sensible way to minimize the probability that cuckoldry will be rewarded.

Many old customs make much more sense once the effects of women’s tendency to cheat are taken into account.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
E January 10, 2012 at 02:24

Ted

top 5 REGRETS OF THE DYING
1.
2. I wish I didn’t work so hard.
This came from every male patient that I nursed.

Let me guess they must of all been married men.
I can’t imagine a single man having this problem.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
BetaToPUA January 10, 2012 at 03:50

No, but women dress that way because it makes them feel happy, don’t you know?

I wonder if you’d still see skirts that short if no men were going to be around. I just wish the women would spread their legs as easily as you might imagine from the way their dressed. Sadly, most women dressed like that are only interested in validation from men in the form of their attention.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Eric26 January 10, 2012 at 06:21

I wonder how many people upvoted comments about how these women are morally reprehensible and then also upvoted comments about how they are ripe for the picking. Guess what, fucking sluts makes you a slut.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 7
Stoltz January 10, 2012 at 06:57

I have often said this and was even going to write an article about it, “How Feminism has Objectified Women” In all its vain attempts by both trumpeting women’s liberation while scorning men about objectifying women, they have actually gone and done it themselves.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
Aharon January 10, 2012 at 08:12

“I wish I didn’t work so hard. This came from every male patient that I nursed.”
‘Let me guess they must of all been married men.’

@E,

My father kept working (part-time) as a pharmacist until he was 75 years old. He told me that he only kept working to get out of the house so he could avoid my mother/his wife. I’m so glad that I was able to learn from his mistakes in observing him wasting his life away being a zealous provider and chivalrous knight for women tolerating their craziness. RIP dad.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
oddsock January 10, 2012 at 08:19

Aharon

I also had much the same experience with my own father. He worked shifts often double shifts. He passed away two years ago this month.

He had been deeply programmed to be a provider all his life and sadly that was the only good word my mother said about him. ” He was a good provider” . It was so sad to see him in his last days still refusing to treat himself or be kind to himself in anyway. Not the best of fathers by any means but we all went short of nothing except perhaps his time.

I have also met many married men that worked endless overtime and would often laugh when I asked them why? They would often say they would rather be in work with their mates than at home with the wife.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 7
Aharon January 10, 2012 at 09:08

oddsock,

RIP to your dad too. Mine wasn’t the best role-model and he definitely could not give good worldly advice. I know what you mean since my dad also wasn’t kind to himself. What is it with men/husbands/dads sacrificing for others though not being kind or enjoying life more outside of work? My dad went from working his full-time job to often also a part-time job for extra income, and then to working around the house and yard fixing and improving things. Even as a kid I hated watching him do that not wanting to be some bitches work dog.

My dad worked so we could always have food on the table…not that my mother could cook food and she hated to be in the kitchen. She didn’t fulfill her responsibility as a mother ands wife — she just wanted the glory and power of the role. One reason I enjoy good home cooking is that I never had it when younger.

It’s not surprising that some employers like to hire and promote married men. They possibly know some of those men will really appreciate the time at the office away from their wives.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3
oddsock January 10, 2012 at 09:54

Aharon

Thanks

An added problem in family was that both my parents had come froma poor and quite brutal background. Neither of them experienced parental love etc. I also believe this contributed to why my dad worked so hard. He had experienced poverty plus I am sure he thought he was doing his part to make sure we never experienced the same.

I believe many employers prefer married men because they are more of a trapped animal. They will put up with a lot more crap than a single guy. Infact, even as an older single guy myself I tend to get a bit of flak from the married men simply because I can come and go as I please. This seems to really irk them. I have even had a few of them tell me I should settle down and find a wife etc. Meaning they want me to just as trapped and miserable as them. They can be quite dangerous and will stab you in the back.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 6
continent January 10, 2012 at 10:30

Would marriages last longer if brides were made wear knickers under the wedding dress?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2084495/Brazilian-councillor-proposes-law-demanding-brides-wear-underwear-marry.html?ITO=socialnet-googleplus-dailymail

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
Aharon January 10, 2012 at 10:46

oddsock,

Interesting yet it’s sad how a parent’s childhood suffering is sometimes unfairly passed onto or re-visited on the children in the same or in different ways. I don’t believe either of my parents experienced a brutal unloving childhood with their parents. They did grow up in the depression and were young adults during WW2. Their parents had migrated from Russia to the USA so that was part of their baggage too.

Yes, I can see married men giving some flack out of jealousy and what not. I’m also hearing through the grapevine other cases when married guys will honestly be happy for their single male co-workers and advise them not to marry. If an office has many bachelors and one gets engaged I think some men are starting to quietly meet up and hold a funeral wake with lots of drinking after hours. Meanwhile, Team Women rush around the office giving each other hugs wishfully saying about themselves ‘there is hope for us girls too’. Oh yeah. Bottom line: I agree some married men can be bitter and want single men to be married. That way those men can spread the trapped enslaved mentality and dedication around chaining us up too. I don’t want to join the Captured by Cunt Clan Crowd. No thanks!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3
Codeazure January 10, 2012 at 13:52

I was in England a couple of months ago & was shocked at how obese they are. It has become much worse in recent years (or maybe I just notice it more). I agree with the comments about how generally repulsive the women photographed are. How many of them would you trust in any way?

I did like the brilliant phrase “sexual signalling arms race to the bottom”- I hadn’t thought of it that way before, but that is very accurate. If 80% of the women are competing for 20% of the men, then this is the natural consequence.

I can understand why so many men go their own way or just become players. Meeting a women who is “pretty” and who can have values such as “faith, virtue, chastity, fidelity, thrift, industry, integrity, a nurturing nature, and contentment” seems almost impossible.

But it can be done. They do exist. Not so many in the English speaking world though. But when you find one, it is awesome.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
Somehow Somewhat January 10, 2012 at 14:35

On the topic of bankruptcy,

this is what happens when Single and Independent Women meet the collapsed system: They literally dump their very own children.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16472310
Greek women dump their own children to be cared by MEN priests. Note, PC-brigade will not allow the title of the article to show the fact that only women were quoted in the article as dumping their children.

No mention is made of the fathers of the children. A wild guess would be these fathers were cut out of their family so that the single and independent women can collect cheques from the government and the dad too.

Humdinger of a Harbinger for The Future.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
JFP January 10, 2012 at 16:17

Eincrou, thanks for that link. Amusing reading there on Forbes about SWTOR. If you play through the bounty hunter quests and around level 15 you have to find a lost nobleman. Long story short, the guy is a naive pretty boy who had been brainwashed/dominated by a cold hearted imperial noblewoman. You have the option of pushing him back to his “mistress” or getting him to go home to the Republic.

I’ve found most of my fellow gamers, nerds etc are liberals/feminists. Especially the ones who’ve made it somewhat in life. They’ve gotten married and/or done well in life with a girlfriend now so they buy into the liberal orthodoxy they grew up with. You know, the one that crapped on them a lot for being nerds. They’re even more scared than the “norms” (either liberal or conservative) of losing what they have and becoming outsiders again so they won’t dare speak out against the PC mindset.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
David K. Meller January 11, 2012 at 15:41

A trend always continues until its conclusion, unless it is corrected, or at least disrupted, by an alternative trend. Feminism has turned women into garbage, denigrating and ignoring all that is charming and feminine, playful and engaging about women, and emphasising all that is masculine, utilitarian, and power-oriented.

Oddly enough, there was, and is, an enormous amount of high dudgeon expressed by feminists against men who treat these revolting specimens of “womanho0d(?)” as so-called sex objects. This was a parallel to the drive to get women out of the home, and to make them as useless to men as possible. The finality of it all is that the only thing that women had to offer men was sex, and sex in its rawest, most animalistic form. Of course, once the coupling was completed, the man had absolutely no reason to stay (unless the worthless slut became pregnant, and then–DING DING DING–Jackpot! 21 years of brat support and court ordered maintainence). If she could get the lust-ridden slob to “marry’ her, so much the better!

Where are we now? I daresay that feminism is a revolution that is rapidly devouring its children! The supply of men who are willing, or even, given the economic uncertainty, able, to support a “hottie” and her bastard spawn, is seriously declining, no matter how much the feminist media bleat and wail about “deadbeat dads”. You can of course, send babymama’s sperm donor to the clink, but that doesn’t support her and the brats any better; indeed, it takes one more man out of the labor force (or what is left of it), confines him in forced idleness (for that matter, making him almost unemployable ever again, as a prison record, even for a nonviolent offence, such as childsupport arrears, is a black mark against him for life) for some $45,000/year, paid for by guess who, along with sundry “healthcare”, publik skoolz, and food for babymama and her spawn also being paid for by an ever shrinking pool of taxpayers!

Womens Liberation? Ain’t it grand? Makes you almost yearn for the days of the dunking stool and the stocks, doesn’t it?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Avenger January 11, 2012 at 23:28

A slut that doesn’t lie is a prostitute…that’s why I think a necessary MRA plank needs to be legalized regulated prostitution

I’m against prostitution. Since men have done all of the major suffering throughout and given the female the easylife she now has, all females OWE all men sex on demand at any time they are chosen. If they refuse then they pay a $10k fine or 30 days in jail.
And if she’s too stupid to use birth control and gets knocked up the she spends the 9 months in jail and the kid is sold to a couple who want to adopt. This way she can’t get child support or benefits.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Common Monster January 12, 2012 at 10:31

…I just wish the women would spread their legs as easily as you might imagine from the way their dressed. Sadly, most women dressed like that are only interested in validation from men in the form of their attention. (BetaToPUA)

Drew Carey had a funny line about this…
“You know that look women get when they want to have sex?
Me neither.”

Women have wrecked every decent sexual signalling device they ever had. Now they literally have no way to “ask for it”, presumably because “it” isn’t anything they want, so maintaining the integrity of the relevant rules and protocols holds no meaning for them. Only the attention and power and privilege. Things mean just what they want them to mean, and not anything else. Because nothing is anything more than another occasion to play dress-up.

EW, is this pretty/hot dichotomy your version of the madonna/whore complex?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
William January 12, 2012 at 17:02

Really and truly, I fail to see how all these gloom and doom laments about how society has lost its values should bother men at all. You have to realize that the ones who suffer from slutting it out are the women because a woman’s window of opportunity to find a good man is limited. There has never been a better time in the history of humanity to be a man. All a man needs is a fair amount of game, common sense, and street savvy to work the system to his advantage. The only men I see who care about this are those saps who still hold on to this whole “get married and start a family” nonsense. Women have made themselves into sluts and men should take advantage accordingly.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
Retronuevo January 13, 2012 at 07:00

Guys…

Don’t despair…help is at hand

Just back from the ‘Glodal South.’

There are hundreds of millions of women down there, dying to meet you.
..and yes they are ‘old school’

It’s a good idea to not come back to the West though(with them).

So… pack tonight…

The West is beyond salvation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: