Feminists vs. Good Men Project: Matlack Makes a Stand, Then Disappoints

by W.F. Price on December 24, 2011

Tom Matlack, who founded the Good Men Project in part with the well-meaning, if naïve, idea that a process of self-improvement, introspection and mutual respect between the sexes could solve many of the problems that beset men and bring about some resolution of the gender wars, has sailed directly into a feminist broadside unleashed by the usual suspects.

Matlack, apparently frustrated by pervasive man-bashing, wrote an article in defense of men titled “Being a Dude is a Good Thing.” It’s actually quite reasonable, and could only be interpreted as provocative by those who ascribe to radical feminism.

A few quotes:

Why do men get blamed for everything? Well, the cynical response is, “because we can really be assholes sometimes.” I’m going to set aside gross acts of what I would call evil: rape, sex trafficking, murder, and felonies of pretty much any kind. I’m more interested in the petty shit that fills our day-to-day and ends up defining us normally imperfect human beings.

[...]

Here’s my theory, and it’s nothing but a theory. Men and women are different. Quite different in fact. But women would really like men to be more like them.

In the locker room, in the bathroom, on the walk out of the board room, in my conversations with men of all kinds, that’s what I hear more than anything. The resignation that to be a man is to be unacceptable at some level to the woman in your life.

[...]

My unscientific theory is from a fundamental disconnect between men and women at the micro level. Men know women are different. They think differently, they express emotion differently, they are motivated by different things, they think about sex differently, and they use a very different vocabulary.

Why can’t women accept men for who they really are? Is a good man more like a woman or more truly masculine?

While I don’t really believe women want men to be more like women, it’s no mystery why many men, like Tom Matlack, would come to that conclusion. The problem is that they are listening to what women say, and not watching what they do. Additionally, they are conflating feminist demands with the desires of real women, whereas what feminists say women want is often the exact opposite of the truth.

Take, for example, the unending complaints about “objectification.” Feminists have long been complaining about the objectification of women. One theory I have is that much of this angst is simply due to the fact that other women are being objectified — it’s demoralizing for women to see other females soaking up attention from males. Being the “object” of sexual attention is both psychologically gratifying and sexually arousing for women, so when feminists complain about women being objectified, what they are really saying is “it is a terrible injustice that it is not me who is the object of universal desire” (see Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism).

So, having written a piece in which he admits to being frustrated and a bit confused by mixed messages – in other words, an entirely normal male reaction to women’s conflicting demands – but not going after women or feminists in any direct manner, Tom is promptly attacked by all manner of feminists for not being the kind of “Good Man” they expect him to be.

For our benefit, Amanda Marcotte, in responding to and attacking Mr. Matlack, lets us know what she thinks qualifies men as good. In a piece titled “The Good Men Project I used to Know,” she calls his article “a risible, sexist piece of garbage,” advocates censorship and throws around a few slurs.

Here’s Amanda at her feminist best:

It’s a real shame to see that a steady campaign of misogynist blather from so-called “men’s rights activists” in the comments at Good Men Project has poisoned founder Tom Matlack’s mind. Personally, I’m a big fan of just banning MRAs. They have nothing of value to add to a conversation, and exist online solely to disrupt any conversation they fear might lead others towards reaching the conclusion that women are people. The whole mission behind the Good Men Project is presumably to advocate for good men, and while they do publish writings by actual good men, they also publish writings by overt misogynists like Paul Elam, who by definition cannot be good men, any more than members of white supremacist groups can be called “good men”. Differing viewpoints is one thing, but promoting the work of open bigots is just fucked up.

One thing about Amanda is that she can be remarkably candid. Her Chekist tendencies are on display as she demands that one subset of men be banhammered from any discussion about good men, because “by definition [they] cannot be good men.”

As much as I dislike them, I don’t even ban feminists from The Spearhead comments, and I wouldn’t even think of demanding they be banned from a women’s forum/website. In fact, it strikes me that anyone who would make such demands – especially a member of an outgroup – must have an enormously entitled attitude and a huge sense of superiority. It would be as though I were to walk into a mosque and demand certain Muslims be excluded because I, personally, despite not being Muslim, didn’t agree with their views on Islam. It is this kind of behavior that really snatches the “equality” veil off the feminist face, and Marcotte does us all an unintentional favor by putting it out there for all the world to see.

Futrelle, over at his Manboobz online feminist peanut gallery, inveighs against Matlack as well, but as usual he is too lazy to rise above his signature snark, and fails to produce any worthwhile quotes.

However, there is an element of humor to this story, as a clearly clueless Roseanne Barr rises from the morass to take poorly-aimed potshots at men through Twitter.

A few of Roseanne’s tweets (T. Matlack exposes himself a bit here as well):

@feministfather @TMatlack @jennpozner what is MRA???
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago

@TheRealRoseanne MRA is for men’s rights and the fringe is pretty crazy about how men have been mistreated in divorce and elsewhere
TMatlack 8 days ago

[Hugo Schwyzer weighs in]

@rugcernie @amandamarcotte no, it’s not one organization. A loose and disparate movement of the deadbeat and the desperate
hugoschwyzer 8 days ago

@jennpozner @feministfather @TMatlack you mean closet case whiners, right?
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago

@TheRealRoseanne @jennpozner @feministfather yeah that’s a good summary.
TMatlack 8 days ago

[...]

@jennpozner the judges in this country are giving kids to their sexually abusive fathers everyday over their underemployed mothers-yet-
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago

@TheRealRoseanne @jennpozner fake male “feminist” whiners have yet 2 mention that fact EVER.
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago

[...]

@jennpozner i understand-R difference is that I don’t believe that women have allies in men, or they would already hve dismantled patriarchy
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago

@jennpozner I also believe its men who R marginalized- they choose to live outside of reality-like #1 marginalizd group-the mentally ill.
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago

Whew, Roseanne is a real specimen, isn’t she?

As for Matlack’s comment – that he essentially agrees that MRAs are “closet case whiners” – I’m going to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume that he reflexively tries to ingratiate those he perceives as famous. However, given the whipping he’s getting from the likes of Marcotte and various other feminists, you’d think he would have learned the lesson that you can’t satisfy them until you’ve so debased yourself that you are at the level of Hugo Schwyzer.

As for the rest of us, we should just let Roseanne’s hatred sink in a bit. This is feminism. Anyone who wants to confirm that men are in fact blamed simply for being men can do so simply by reading the twitter exchange linked above. Too bad Tom couldn’t resist the impulse to join in.

{ 143 comments… read them below or add one }

Uncle Elmer December 24, 2011 at 16:13

Speaking of feminist humor, Amanda used “risible” repeatedly. So I googled(risible) :

ris·i·ble [riz-uh-buhl] adjective
1. causing or capable of causing laughter; laughable; ludicrous.
2. having the ability, disposition, or readiness to laugh.
3. pertaining to or connected with laughing.

All this time I thought it had something to do with men’s erections, as in “getting a rise out of him”. Thanks Amanda.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 45 Thumb down 3
piercedhead December 24, 2011 at 16:15

Bullies are always cowards. They’re going after Matlack because he’s the weakest link in the men’s rights arena.

Same reason they give their husbands hell.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 82 Thumb down 2
W.F. Price December 24, 2011 at 16:20

Risible is one of those words people use to sound smart, but I think it’s kind of a poor fit for English (comes from French for “to laugh” — rire) because it doesn’t intuitively associate with the English equivalent, and these days makes the writer look pretentious.

Why not just use “laughable?”

“Risible” as used by Pontius Pilate in “Life of Brian”

Pugs Fugly December 24, 2011 at 16:20

One thing I’ll say — being new to all of this — is that after this dust-up over Matlack’s GMP article, I was able to peruse a series of blogs and websites that I’d previously not known about (nor would have ever given a second glance to).

The better writers, regardless of content or perspective, are on the MRA side of the argument.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 63 Thumb down 3
Uncle Elmer December 24, 2011 at 16:27

Why not just use “laughable?”

—————-

One feminist will discover a word and the rest will parrot the shit out of it.

Twenty years ago they could not get enough of “ineluctable”,
definition : Unable to be resisted or avoided; inescapable: “the ineluctable facts”.

Google(ineluctable feminism) for a sample.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 4
YBM December 24, 2011 at 16:45

Oh Roseanne Barr, there is someone with some worthwhile things to add to mens conversations. We all secretly want to sleep with her, that’s for sure.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 11
American December 24, 2011 at 16:56

Gender-Raunch; (N)
Gender; is the new form of feminism that replaced “Equality” feminism.
Raunch; Is what Ariel levy describes in her book about the new “Raunch-feminism”.
You combine these two styles, and you can accurately articulate the modern form of feminism practiced on American University campuses around the country; “Gender-Raunch”.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 15
JFP December 24, 2011 at 16:59

I wish Matlack well in his journey. My cynical side says he’ll never wake up. I shared his idealism just 8 or so years ago. “We can have an honest debate on these issues! Diplomacy will work!”. No, it won’t. They don’t want a debate, they want to shame you Tom.

If someone keeps calling you a no good low down dirty dog, even when you aren’t, they shouldn’t be surprised when you start acting like one. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t kinda wakes one up to reality.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 64 Thumb down 0
TFH December 24, 2011 at 17:06

So Roseanne Barr has done enough to qualify for a registry in register-her.com, under the ‘bigot’ category, no?

I think Paul and his crew are letting a few cockroaches slip away. We should get him to enter Roseanne into it asap…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 5
TFH December 24, 2011 at 17:07

Roseanne Barr is predictable : Her fame from her TV show did not increase her SMV one bit, due to the Solipism of her mind. She is still seen as ugly by men, while in the meantime seeing even fat John Goodman get laid with hotties (on account of his fame, of course).

Hence, her Solipism leads her to hate men who did not get a woody on account of her fame.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 60 Thumb down 3
Operation Opt-Out December 24, 2011 at 17:15

“Personally, I’m a big fan of just banning MRAs. They have nothing of value to add to a conversation, and exist online solely to disrupt any conversation they fear might lead others towards reaching the conclusion that women are people.”

Sure Amanda, when MRA’s are kicking your intellectual lights out you should silence them, but lets be honest, thats been the feminist agenda all along. Need to keep the conversation over at TGMP dumbed down a bit to justify your relevance. Answer me this riddle girlfriend, what is your definition of a “Good Man”? Im dying to hear this Christmas tail.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 57 Thumb down 1
Skeptic December 24, 2011 at 17:28

Why did Roseanne Barr bury her ex-husband 10 meters underground?

Because she believed that deep down he was a really nice guy!

This tells us a lot about how she’s such a pissy feminist mess -
http://www.tmz.com/2011/11/18/roseanne-barr-must-pay-lawyer-fees-ex-husband-ben-thomas/#.TvZ7jfK3xsI

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 1
NWOslave December 24, 2011 at 17:41

@American

I like to call the new progressive men/women are the same Gender-Raunch feminism. 3-D feminism. Dresses, dolly’s and dildo’s. Put on a dress, insert dildo, crawl into bed clutching your dolly and weep for a womans approval and affection. Just to show how egalitarian women are; They’re willing to approve of men wearing dresses, playing with dolly’s, getting boned and weeping like infants. Just makes ya wanna break outta that bad old patriarchy genderbox, doesn’t it?

Back to the topic at hand. What cracks me up about the site laughably called the good men project is, it’s all about women.
How can you be better to women?
How can you give more to women?
How can you please women?
How can you be more loving towards women?
How can you be more sympathic to women?
How can you be more respectful towards women?

Since when is catering to every womans whim the defining aspect of being a good man? Oh yeah. I forgot. We’ve been force-fed a lifetime of misandry, victimology, and most importantly.
Man = Bad!
Woman = Good!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 75 Thumb down 6
gdgm+ December 24, 2011 at 19:36

GMP is still an awful site, and I continue to ignore it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 39 Thumb down 0
bruno December 24, 2011 at 19:58

I just heard the old song: “Dirty Old man” from “The 3 Degrees” on the radio, and I looked up the lyrics.
The chorus goes like this:

Chorus:
You’re a dirty old man,
You can’t keep your hands to yourself,
You’re a dirty old man,
Go mess around with somebody else
….

I wonder if the genders were reversed, if they would play it still so much on the radio. For example:

Chorus:
You’re an ugly old woman,
You’re so disgusting to me,
You’re an ugly old woman,
Please go hang yourself.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 4
freebird December 24, 2011 at 20:17

Really the -gender-raunch guy-has the main valid point.

From the top down (Obummer) the administration of the western nations
are so busy cowing to the %2 queer population they forget about the hetero’s.

Actually that’s not true,they are using it to disrupt society (Marxism)
and to implement a corporate Police state.(fascism)

Women in general are so acclimated to having the make do her fighting that they embrace any state sponsored violence as a right.(It’s not!)

Women are bullies, this is just a recent example.

If Tom was smart he would be looking for a job that doesn’t require sacrificing his manhood,and journalist integrity.

If he’s not looking now, he oughta be, the wimmins never forget a turncoat,even of the smallest order,they cannot tolerate the idea that men should have rights to be spoken of in public.

He’s gonna go sooner or later,if he was smart it would be sooner.

As for Hugo,he can munch all the carpet he likes,they will still turn upon him due to his external genitalia.
It’s just a matter of time.

These lesbian radfems are serious about
eliminating hetro males altogether.

Imprisoning us at a whim via VAWA lawz will not be enough to slate their blood lust!

The cops are armed thugs working to extort money at gun pint for the misandrist courts.

Saying it’s your job don’t make it right.

They’re not keeping the peace, they are waging gender/raunch war for the lesbian man-haters.
Own your shit,boys in blue!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 12
Avenger December 24, 2011 at 20:40

Uncle Elmer December 24, 2011 at 16:13

Speaking of feminist humor, Amanda used “risible” repeatedly. So I googled(risible)

Yes, she does appear to be obsessed with that word. Perhaps it’s on her mind since she’s never been able to get a “rise”
out of any man.
Perhaps she should take up dancing :)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 3
Avenger December 24, 2011 at 20:49

Bruno you can do better than this
Chorus:
You’re an ugly old woman,
You’re so disgusting to me,
You’re an ugly old woman,
Please go hang yourself.

How about..

You’re a fugly old female
Beaten by the ugly stick
You ain’t ever gonna suck my dick
So just go turn a trick
Please go take the gaspipe

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 3
andybob December 24, 2011 at 20:51

Tom Matlack is a late developer. He has had intimate contact with feminists for many years. Yet he has only very recently woken up to the fact that they hate him the same way they hate all penis owners. MRA’s, gamers, gays, straights, male feminists, serial rapists – we’re all the same to the likes of Amanda Marcotte. Years of genuflecting obeyance will not save him from their pitiless scorn.

Mr Matlack is not a fool. He is just a typical male who has been brainwashed through years of conditioning to swallow feminists lies about Equality and Bad Men. I’m sure I’m not the only one who used to believe that feminism was about fairness and that NAWALT. It remains to be seen if this experience will cause a monumental shift in Mr Matlack’s worldview. I certainly hope so.

Feminists are talented at alienating people and their staunchest opponents are former allies who have been made rudely aware of their lack of humanity, logic and decency. The Good Men Project was always going to annoy feminists because it involved men. I’m surprised the likes of Ms Marcotte disguised her yearning to stomp all over it for as long as she did.

Ms Barr is a has-been provocateur who made a career pandering to the kind of lazy women who lapped up entitlement. She should be assigned to the scrap heap of popular culture next to Alf and the Bionic Woman. Domestic Goddess indeed.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 110 Thumb down 2
TheOrangeOne December 24, 2011 at 20:56

I feel like I’m looking at a continuous stream of hate, confusion, shit and filth running slowly down a wall.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 2
keyster December 24, 2011 at 21:25

At one time we all had a little Tom Matlack in us; male guilt and deference to women and feminism. Like most people we went about our lives not questioning it, like it was air.

Once you encounter a genuine militant feminist like Marcotte, your journey into understanding this oppressive fascist hate movement begins. She flies the feminist flag loud and proud, with no pretense or innuendo. And for doing this she’s quite useful as an example of “what a REAL feminist looks like”. She hates men, she just hates feminist men a little bit less.

One thing she consistently reveals is the feminist intolerance for tolerance of anyone that questions their view. If Tom Matlack thought he was going to inspire an open and honest discussion about what men actually think, he’s now learned feminists won’t permit it to take place. Welcome to the club Tom! …you privilaged white male pig!

He tried to gently nudge the Good Men Project in a direction that might appeal to non-feminist men, broaden their base a little, and this is what happens. The feminists go hysterical over it. After all it’s THEIR web site THEY use to indocrinate young men into compliance. The doctrine MUST be strictly adhered to and expressed as such or else…HERESY!

Tom Matlack must now make ammends by first humbly apologising for offending the readership, then swearing his allegiance to the goals of the web site to promote feminist ideology among unindocrinated young men. He expressed himself as a man with actual balls for just a moment and for that he his sorry. It happens; as feminists will tell you we’re flawed that way and we need to be kept in check.

OR…

…he could take a good hard look in the mirror and ask himself how much he truly values his own intellectual honesty and integrity as a compassionate and empathetic fellow human; something feminists are incapable of doing.

It’s either pro-feminist/pro-woman or pro-human being Tom.
There is no inbetween.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 84 Thumb down 2
Craig Himself December 24, 2011 at 23:04

You gents are the shit. Merry Christmas.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 1
oddsock December 24, 2011 at 23:17

Happy Christmas guys and good will to all men.

Keyster. Below is an excellent and very recent video by G Edward Griffin.

I simply post it so at the very least you may understand more why myself and others no longer have the same passion for politics as yourself. Perhaps it may even help you adjust your campaign ?

P.s, what he says applies across all developed nations.

The Collectivist Conspiracy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dON5D6Wkprw&feature=channel_video_title

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 20
Annonymous December 24, 2011 at 23:45

Someone else, on describing mens iconic characterisation and iconic identity in the prevaling hegemony said it best on another post Welmer: That …

… “By seizing every single opportunity to enter and express ourselves as flesh and blood males in the discourses, by participation in the discussions, the arguments, the topics, the talks, the disputes, the blogs, the forums, we create space for ourselves, for our gender, for our identity and for our own humanity.”

…”Because it is only where the enemy is able to effectively exclude a group from the discourses, that the so excluded group, over time, increasingly looses its human identity to takes on whatever notoriety and negative name it is persistently mislabelled with.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 0
Henry Laasanen December 24, 2011 at 23:54

From my experiences (here in Finland) I would say, that balancing between feminists and masculists is impossible in the long run. Big portion of both groups will eventually hate you.

I agree with the idea, that only by “Schwyzer” style of total submission to feminism, you get some respect from the hardcore feminists. But it is also total lobotomy.

So, the only working option for the thinking “in-between men” is identification with masculism (maybe with sympathy toward feminism).

The concept of Good Men Project don’t work in the long run, because there will be insolvable problems.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 0
tiredofitall December 24, 2011 at 23:58

“Differing viewpoints is one thing, but promoting the work of open bigots is just fucked up.” – Amanda Marcotte

I wonder if Amanda even contemplated the irony of her writing those words for a second?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 58 Thumb down 1
MRA December 25, 2011 at 00:07

What he liked about feminist was the same thing TGMP was about from the beginning >>>female approval <<< in this case feminist cookie, like NWOslave pointed, it is about what women want and demand but in theirs core they hate, that is the first motive why women don't care or behave like a lady anymore because feminist have poisoned so deep they believe:

Having a vagina=being a lady= deserve respect being disrespectful=advocate Irresponsible Behavior Without Consequences=but you are still the victim.

That is why when you tell women to behave like a lady and they blow up, they hate to be categorized X kind of women, but is what feminist and TGMP have been always, how man you are, how manliness has to be redefined, man up, how they have to redefined manhood, but they hate when it come back, men don't marry slut, be a lady, be a little more classy,don't go drinking and be blaming everybody else for what you did when you are an adult person (I'm NOT talking legally 18) feminist is about what women want to make believe other women how are the "good" kind of men but when they find him, hate him and cheat on him.

It is all about good income and bad outcome for women.

" @jennpozner the judges in this country are giving kids to their sexually abusive fathers everyday over their underemployed mothers-yet-
TheRealRoseanne 8 days ago"

Lolllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll mother F*cker, fight for YEARS for the RIGHTS to have involved in your OWN child live is not being sexual abusive, in fact this shouldn't be happening if feminists really care about children, the NUMBERS and FACTS about how different are children who grow up with a big bond with theirs father aside from those raised by wife-of-the-state-mom has been there for decades.

I just hate every time fathers groups are demonized such as Fathers4Justice who just are so responsible to unite and demand better future men and women theirs children are going to be.

What Matlack needs to do is watch Menwomenmyth videos series and read a lot of AVFM, AndryHarry and so on.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 2
Traveller December 25, 2011 at 00:11

Merry Christmas to every one.

I just hope your decision of not banning anyone like the raging feminists, despite it is obvious they have nothing interesting to say, will not turn in a weakness.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Traveller December 25, 2011 at 00:12

I mean a weakness for this site, not personal.

And further, where is finished Peter Nolan?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 4
An Onym Ous December 25, 2011 at 00:17

May be it is time to start “Good Women Project”?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 0
W.F. Price December 25, 2011 at 00:28

From my experiences (here in Finland) I would say, that balancing between feminists and masculists is impossible in the long run. Big portion of both groups will eventually hate you.

I agree with the idea, that only by “Schwyzer” style of total submission to feminism, you get some respect from the hardcore feminists. But it is also total lobotomy.

-Henry Laasanen

I’m lucky (or the opposite) in that I learned that reasoning with feminists is futile at the very beginning of my trouble with family law. There’s something about having people with guns come after you that puts things in perspective.

Most of the men who still think they can negotiate with these types simply don’t know how brutal they can and will be toward men. Once you’ve learned that lesson, their machinations are a lot more transparent.

I should point out, however, that in some cases women really are not all like that. Feminists are a breed apart — they are very vicious, and should be recognized as such. In my case, my former mother-in-law was a true-blue feminist, replete with a half-dozen lesbian “friends” (I strongly suspect she had lesbian lovers) who worked in the local women’s political groups, shelters and Planned Parenthood. I know women like Amanda Marcotte up close and personal, and I’ve got no illusions about finding “common ground” with them.

Robert December 25, 2011 at 00:29

http://www.avoiceformen.com/featured/agent-orange-files-released/

Or go here to download the Agent Orange files immediately. 160 megabytes:

http://agentorangefiles.com/

http://counterfem.blogspot.com/

Watch the video. I bet it would make ms. marcotte’s clitoris quiver.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Robert December 25, 2011 at 00:32

I also encourage you to download the zip file and read it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
W.F. Price December 25, 2011 at 00:37

I mean a weakness for this site, not personal.

And further, where is finished Peter Nolan?

-Traveller

Peter’s still doing his thing. I’ve got nothing against Peter, but he was taking the personal attacks on other commenters too far, and getting me involved in family and other personal disputes by posting people’s private info on the site. I hope he’s well, but I just don’t have time for that.

Opus December 25, 2011 at 03:47

English is a very interesting language; and one of the things one notices is that when pretention is on the horizon the writer frequently either lapses into archaisms (words like doughty) or into French-imports (here- risible). Churchill’s Fight-them-on-the-Beaches speech is entirely devoid of such words, which is perhaps why it is so strong. Frankly I think the blue-stocking Marcotte – in the spirit of equality – should be ‘thrown to the floor’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
Aharon December 25, 2011 at 04:28

“I’m sure I’m not the only one who used to believe that feminism was about fairness and that NAWALT. It remains to be seen if this experience will cause a monumental shift in Mr Matlack’s worldview.”

Years ago I was a naive supporter of feminism. I then spent a year living in a semi-communal home near Berkeley California with one other man and two feminist women who didn’t have a clue how openly misandrist they behaved. I woke up and my worldview changed. I wish Tom well on his journey.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 3
Just1X December 25, 2011 at 05:11

Opus

thrown to the floor – woughly?

Free Roderick / Brian etc

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Jim December 25, 2011 at 06:09

The fire rises.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
oddsock December 25, 2011 at 06:28

Fwow him to the fwor vewy woughly

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 7
American December 25, 2011 at 06:44

Sometimes when i see a Gender-Raunch inflaming the public, i want to say “go F@ck yerself you loud , inappropriate, ignorant bitch”.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 15
American December 25, 2011 at 06:46

Boxer said the other day, guys should thank their lucky stars they don’t have a loudmouth, abusive, ignorant, arrogant nag in their lives.
Rock on Boxer; merry X-mas.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 22 Thumb down 14
Uncle Elmer December 25, 2011 at 08:04

Fwow him to the fwor vewy woughly and wogure him.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 4
Troll King December 25, 2011 at 09:04

OT.

Looks like the Saudis are doing something right.

http://arabnews.com/saudiarabia/article549097.ece

I saw this link on a feminist forum where they were complaining about it. Fucking hypocrites.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2
Just1X December 25, 2011 at 09:23

I think that we ought to thank Man-Jaw Marcotte for devoting so much personal time to waking-the-fuck-up Magina Matlack.

He should be grateful too, perhaps he can re-purpose his Good Boy Project into a real beacon for masculinity, Mandy won’t like that either of course, but then the real lesson is;

Men cannot make feminists happy (and live) – so there’s no point trying

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 1
oddsock December 25, 2011 at 10:22

Fwow him to the fwor vewy woughly and wogure him.

Wait until Bigus Dickus hears of this !

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 8
crella December 25, 2011 at 10:24

‘A loose and disparate movement of the deadbeat and the desperate
hugoschwyzer 8 days ago’

He’s one to talk….good God…..if half of what he confesses to is true, on top of the nauseating articles he’s written on his blog, then that man is one piece of work. How dare he label others as somehow defective?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 7
Eric J Schlegel December 25, 2011 at 10:35

Sometimes when i see a Gender-Raunch inflaming the public, i want to say “go F@ck yerself you loud , inappropriate, ignorant bitch”.

American, I feel the same way. I can think of 1000 more such one-liners. And if I were there with you, I’d owe you a beer.
Yet in any idealogical debate, FORGET COMPLETELY the notion of converting the enemy; The battle is never won until you kill the enemy’s will to fight. Those true believers absolutely entrenched in their own solipsism will literally die before ever saying “oh…well…that’s fair I guess…” and to scream what you suggest will merely gratify them.
You can only speak the truth and allow whatever open minds are available to accept or reject.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 4
Just1X December 25, 2011 at 10:35

Biggus Dickus’ wife Incontinentia Buttocks is a bit of all right…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
keyster December 25, 2011 at 10:51

@sock
“Keyster. Below is an excellent and very recent video by G Edward Griffin.”

Both Republicans and Democrats are “Collectivists”.
Democrats are Communist/Socialist collectivists.
Republicans are Nazi/Fascist collectivists.
So the citizen should just opt out entirely because of the right/left paradigm that’s been set up by the elites to control people.

The Republican Party IS the party of the individual, of individual freedom, because you may have noticed the Democratic party is the party of women and other identifiable grievance groups.

“Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh would never dare criticize Republicans.” Obviously he’s never taken the time to listen to either one of those men.

This is quintessential Marxist Critical Theory at play.
Criticize the existing system without offering an alternative, because the alternative is a supposedly benevolent Central World Government, like say North Korea but on a worldwide scale.

He’s a liberal/academic/conspiracy theorist who thinks Democrats are too conservative and Republicans are hopelessly extreme fascists. Republicans are co-opting radical groups like the Tea Party.

You can either be a complete nihilist and hope one day this will result in anarchy and the rebuilding of a grand New World Order of peace, love and harmony…or…you can participate in the existing system, flawed though it may be. Ironically this “flawed” system is the very state that allows you to have this choice. We should feel so privileged that the “elitist conspirators” grant us at least this much freedom. Because in the New World Order, you won’t have a choice friend.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 8
oddsock December 25, 2011 at 12:09

Keyster

And you still cant see the irony of your comment?

E.g

“We should feel so privileged that the “elitist conspirators” grant us at least this much freedom. Because in the New World Order, you won’t have a choice friend.”

You have no choice now, it is an illusion to keep people thinking a vote will make a difference.

How many of your senators just voted to pass the bill to enable indefinite detention without charge or legal representation also making a total mockery of your constitution ? The same as the Patriot Act, voted in by people that still think the same as you. The same Senators that are supposed to represent you. It is the same all across the anglosphere.

Keyster you can wriggle and squirm all you like mate call G Edward Griffin any name you want. He is speaking truth you just refuse to accept it. Oh, and If I remember correctly? You believe that two airplanes brought down three buildings on 9/11 and all the other total BS? This alone is why, although you often make well written comments, I simply cannot take you seriously. You are in complete denial and I say that without any malice.

P.s At least you had the balls to watch most of the video. Good on you.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 14 Thumb down 27
American December 25, 2011 at 12:15

This ones for u boxer…”f@ck off you ignorant bitch”. Merry X mas!!

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 14
American December 25, 2011 at 12:19

Not aimed at you boxer, just a tribute to the boxer!

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 15
oddsock December 25, 2011 at 12:30

Keyster

Perhaps an alternative ?

http://direct-democracy.co.uk/

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 16
Jaego Scorzne December 25, 2011 at 12:53

God rest you Merry Gentlemen.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Rocco December 25, 2011 at 15:20

Merry Christmas guys and thanks for the year that has seen more action to help fathers than any year I have seen.

And especially you Welmer, you have made many friends here that you could depend on in time of trouble…….just call.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
American December 25, 2011 at 15:28

Gender-Raunch can go f@ck themselves on this grand holiday.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 19
American December 25, 2011 at 15:43

Boxer, my spiritual brother; Rock on!!!

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 16
buggeroff11 December 25, 2011 at 16:31

Mr Price, you beat me to the punch in your respectfull yet totally TRUE factual response to Henry Laasanen’s reasoning, sorry Henry I respect & understand what you said but the facts are exactly as WFP explained which I also have personally seen time & time again…sad but totally true. Feminists have never been ‘reasonable’ it’s not in their DNA.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Aharon December 25, 2011 at 17:16

“Looks like the Saudis are doing something right.
I saw this link on a feminist forum where they were complaining about it. Fucking hypocrites.”

Good for the Saudis. There are often elements of common sense and wisdom to be learned from traditional cultures. A woman wrote the piece so her claims and selected personal accounts are not reliable. I believe, that in traditional Islam, if divorcing a mother would take custody of the very young children. Older children would then go live with the same-sex parent. I could be wrong. Let the femdogs complain.

Under Islam, I believe that to prove a claim of rape there must be four male witnesses of good character. Twenty years ago I would have called that rule misogyny. Today, as an MRA familiar with the misandry false rape claims, I think requiring male witnesses to a rape in the West is something to consider unless of course there is also solid audio and video proof combined with DNA.

Merry Christmas!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 4
fmz December 25, 2011 at 17:40

There’s a political upshot to this little online tizzy. It means that da menz have the floor/ leading the discourse and da wimminz are on the back foot, reacting, addressing their opposition, wasting their energy and effectively giving it to the other side. It says a lot about the feminasties that they have become so defensive in response to such consciousness amongst men and that they so readily and easily wade in for a tit fight, over such a trivial and innocuous piece. They see the writing on the wall, dont like it and are unwitingly back peddling. Even if they know this or become aware of it, they cannot help digging themselves in deeper. They are at a dead end and have been for years. The so-called mra, mgtow, male backlash is as good as it currently gets for their flailing ideology. They cannot think what to do and they know that without the men shifting in their direction, they’re at the end of their dead-end road.

Also, their reaction draws more people to the audience and inadvertantly works against their political aims. Apart from making themselves look like duffers, they get a lot of folks following this trail. Either matlock is an incidental political machiavelli, or he’s managed a blind-side master move.

GYOW.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Aharon December 25, 2011 at 17:54

It seems that many women want men to have the powers of a chameleon to change his colors, persona, role, and self instantly and to magically and obediently transform into what she wants or needs. I mean in a really silly way. I started recognizing the practice in late high school: some females wanted/needed guys to flow from being a dashing knight in shining armor to big daddy her personal banker and mentor man to being a boy-child she could play with.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
Boxer December 25, 2011 at 18:40

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 26
freebird December 25, 2011 at 19:34

Well the feminists have turned upon Hugo, as predicted.

Tom still needs to be heard from as to the location of his genitalia.

He’s got a chance to make a clean breast of things, will be interesting to see if he’s got the balls to do it.

Tom:
Women have no sense of loyalty,this is solely a male trait,come join the winning side!

Or conversely be castrated by the gyno supremacists.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 1
keyster December 25, 2011 at 20:07

“You believe that two airplanes brought down three buildings on 9/11 and all the other total BS?”

Yes, and don’t forget about the Bush and bin Laden families long time covert relationship too. It’s all part of the great plan to topple the world and enlightened souls such as yourself and Alex Jones are here to warn us.

If only the ruling elite were truly as competent and flawlessly clandestine as you “conspiracy theorists” believe, I’d have more confidence in government than I do. Unfortunately they’re not that bright, nor very good at keeping secrets from us and each other.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 19
Aharon December 25, 2011 at 20:13

Amanda and fatty Rose’s reactions have gone beyond proving any of Tom’s mild criticisms of modern women. Tom’s comment that MRAs are whiners really broadly grouped all MRAs into having one motivation and one type of behavior. Tom, that’s not true and not fair. Perhaps out of pride or otherwise Tom was hesitant to do a 180-degree and felt that he still needed to still push against us MRAs who he has been butting heads with for awhile.

Tom, if you’re reading this, we’re all men and the MRAs are always ready to sit down with you and smoke a peace pipe.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 4
Turbo the Drycleaner December 25, 2011 at 20:19

When someone with an imcompatible ideology uses force or threatens force, there is already no more room for discussion or debate. The time for talking it out and finding common ground ended decades ago. The only options left for those who want a world where men are not slaves are to respond with force, or negotiation with force as a support.

The Good Men Project and its attempts to excuse feminist bigotry would be akin to Paul Revere running to, and not away from, the british ships and asking them if they could talk this whole thing out.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 2
Boxer December 25, 2011 at 22:09

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 41
aussieguy December 25, 2011 at 23:42

First they ignore you…
Then they laugh at you…
Then they fight you…
…Then you win.

Where are we? We’re between the 1st and 2nd lines. Expect to face criticism over the years from more feminists. (Probably even the laws of speech be changed, given the way things are going.)

Feminists know that they can only win if no one speaks up and they hold all the cards. That is, when they face no opposition. When someone wants to speak up, they act as the oppressor (suppress other people’s opinion that does not align with their ideals). They cannot stand that their views can be wrong. They don’t yet understand their ideal utopia doesn’t work and isn’t sustainable in the long term!

Its ironic that the feminist hatred itself has caused the evolution of its male counterparts; The MRA. (MGTOW is another backlash response to feminism)…The latter is more destructive because there is no centralization or command structure to attack. The more they change the laws to suit women, the more men will realise and wake-up…Creating more MRAs or MGTOW.

The most important part of MRA is that they not repeat the same mistake the feminists did…Base their core ideals on hatred. It must be based on truth and real equality in action. (The general public doesn’t support groups based on hatred. They want nothing to do with them. Hate groups are generally ignored…Who wants to hang around someone who keeps talking with hate in their tone? They aren’t pleasant company to keep around.)

Truth is the greatest weakness of the feminist movement. Their statistics are lies and lack logical/academic integrity. (They make crap up). To boost their statistics, they’ll try to change laws in order to manipulate the final result to their ideals. ie: Change rape laws or definitions to bump up the numbers.

Their strategy is predictably dishonest. Its analogous to intentionally changing the factors of a science experiment in order to get the desired result you want. Not actually learning what is really happening in the world. (Analyst companies like IDC regularly do these kinds of “studies” or “surveys” in order to provide marketing materials for companies who pay them!) …This is why you always question who, where, and how the study was done!

The best strategy (I currently see) for a modern western male is to adopt the one pioneered by India’s non-cooperative movement. Feminism can create laws and such to try to force us into a certain way of thinking or the way we say something (political correctness).

But what they cannot do, is invade our minds and directly control us. There is nothing they can do when we become MGTOW. Don’t marry. Don’t have kids. Always out there, working on what we love to do, and living life…Isn’t that what George Clooney is doing?

Japan’s herbivore males is another example of such non-cooperation. Both women and government don’t know what to do when males do not cooperate with the societal norm. The best the gyno-centric media did was try to portray them as homosexuals, etc. (Essentially, belittle anyone that doesn’t fit into their ideals…Like outcasts.)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 1
oddsock December 26, 2011 at 00:57

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 26
bobsutan December 26, 2011 at 03:20

Matlock reminds me of Neo before taking the red pill. Or perhaps he did and is still undergoing his liberation into an MRA?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Scattered December 26, 2011 at 05:35

Keyster

A lot of conspiracies are ridiculous but I for one would like to know how 2 planes brought down 3 buildings, I mean, wouldn’t you?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 14
woggy December 26, 2011 at 05:48

Welcome to your epiphany Tom!

While not every woman is like Mizzzz Marcotte, most might as well be, since they all – well, with a few exceptions- will stand there and just watch as men are verbally bludgeoned, contenting themselves in the idea that “I’m not like that”.

If Tom still feels his urge to p***y beg after this go-round, he ought to scuttle The Good Men Project-worthless and self loathing as it is anyway- and attempt to lure all of the “I’m not like that” bench warmers into the fight with a Good Woman Project.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
oddsock December 26, 2011 at 06:49

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 25
Aharon December 26, 2011 at 07:44

aussieguy,

Long after feminist-political control loses its grip on the West, some men who went MGTOW, ghosted, non-complied, stayed bachelors, etc will possibly hear of the existence of MRAs and the MRM. Unlike women who first join (safety and ‘approval’ in numbers) and operate more effectively in big (fat) feminist herds (cattle, water buffalo, government agencies), men operate very naturally and effectively in small wolf packs or alone like hunting panthers.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
Lara December 26, 2011 at 07:48

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 47
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 10:24

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 38
keyster December 26, 2011 at 10:29

Americans realize there was a third WTC building that collapsed. It’s no coincidence that the erstwhile “Truther” is more often than not going to be a victim of BDS or Bush Derangement Syndrome either, typically the liberal Hollywood elite.

At the risk of reductio ad absurdum, if controlled demolition brought down WTC 7 one is led to assume that there was a tightly organized and controlled, extremely clandestine group of individuals (such as perhaps the Bush’s, bin Laden’s, Dick Cheney, the CIA and the secret Masonic Order) were able to plan and gain access to strategically place explosives throughout the building over time. And that this was planned to coincide with al Qaeda ramming hijacked jet liners into the towers.

This reveals both the cognitive dissonace and hypocrisy of the liberal mindset. If George W. Bush was supposedly one of the stupidist presidents this country ever had, how did he so brilliantly pull off one of the greatest conspiracies of our time, without a hitch?

I’ve got a meeting down at the Lodge, and you and your tin foil hat are not invited. It’s obvious you’re wise to our plans. I’ll tell Barrack you said hello. (We’re supposed to think he’s in Hawaii right now, HA! HA!)

Didn’t you know Roosevelt and Japan secretly colluded on the invasion of Pearl Harbor? Yepper, all worked out in advance. My grandfather, Admiral Keyster was at the meeting. Luckily tin foil had not gained in popularity yet as a thought protection device.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 19
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 10:32

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 40
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 10:55

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 38
Ted December 26, 2011 at 11:44

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 25
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 11:47

“Keyster

A lot of conspiracies are ridiculous but I for one would like to know how 2 planes brought down 3 buildings, I mean, wouldn’t you?”

I’d like keysters response to this too .. & no the fires from building 1&2 werent anywhere near building 3, nor were there any debris or impact from buildings 1&2

Chck out everything from the IRA to the reichstag, for governmental false flags

This is why I hate conservatives & idiots who believe political party’s are some sort of saviours of society

So afraid of even thinking of getting your hands dirty, by going against mainstream manufactured bullox

Btw tinfoil reflects certain types of frequencies, you obviously need a sealed room for total protection, anyway enjoy your sheeple status, conservative, political party believing stupidity

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 18
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 12:09

Btw Schwyzers getting crucified by feminists … looks like all male feminists as well as transgendered, stupid enough to chop my own you know what off, twats, are now no longer feminists …

Some choice quotes …

“I have always been suspicious of self-described “male feminists”. I wrote this on the subject over three years ago when I was guest-blogging at Feministe:

[W]hat the fuck is up with men calling themselves feminists?

I don’t call myself a feminist, because it’s not my call whether I am or not. It’s women’s call. I try not to be a fucking misogynist asshole and do what I can to reduce gender inequity in my professional and … ”

& this smackdown of schwyzer ….

“Schwyzer making amends for his woman-hating violent past by teaching feminsm to classrooms filled with young women is like a child molester making amends for his child-molesting past by teaching classrooms filled with little children how to protect their bodily integrity.”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 7
keyster December 26, 2011 at 12:44

“Keyster
A lot of conspiracies are ridiculous but I for one would like to know how 2 planes brought down 3 buildings, I mean, wouldn’t you?”

Fair ’nuff.

Even bin Laden admitted he was surprised by the effect two jet liners had on each tower. Total collapse was not even a consideration, (remember he knew a thing or two about buildings, steel and reinforced concrete) although he was more than happy it occurred.

The post-mortem couldn’t be rationally explained at first because such an event was never considered even a possibility; the high impact, jet fuel, the temperature extremes, etc. The design “system” was compromised from the top down, one girder at a time. Who’d have thought the bottom or base was so dependent on the integrity of the top?

To say such a powerful and cataclsymic event would not effect the structure integrity of a smaller building of the same type right next to it; the pressure, the implosion, the fire, a compromised sprinkler system, etc., is the other side. Who really knows?

But my original point, for the “Truther” to consider, is that whoever led, organized, coordinated WTC 7 (with US operatives?) had immense, if not reckless, confidence that the participants would remain mum, (including al Qaeda). Perhaps their families are under threat of Masonic Ninja Death Squads, I don’t know. Regardless, people always talk. It’s our nature.

If I’ve learned one thing working for Government the last several years is that while corruption and all manner of political skullduggery exists at all levels, they are also mostly inept and incompetent as well. And assigning suspicion to the likes of politicians, that they could actually pull off such a monumentus conspiracy without a single flaw or leak, is giving them way too much credit. These are not the best and brightest, these are politicians. Don’t confuse the two.

I would think debasing politicans as such would be something we could all agree on. Or do you believe politicans have colluded in acting stupid too, just to keep our guard down?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 11
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 12:55

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 24
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 13:04

Andybob sums up what i’m seeing from the Tom Matlock fallout, all you mangina’s & male feminists, & husbands of feminist indoctrinated skanks, your women want you GROVELING, not as equal partners, got it?

& do you know why? Cos your NOT ALPHA, havent you fuckers figured it out yet?

You dont need to be feminist or a mangina, you dumasses, theyre women ffs…

Grow some balls, be masculine, & these so called feminists have zero power

We live in a biological ideology, not an idealistic ideology, this is why we will never have a utopia

We always revert to our biology & nature, over idealism, this is why feminism is dea d in the water

Women in our society are so fucked up, precisely because they rejected their biological need to be part of a society, through their children, husbands & a family

Imagine if men were no longer engineers & soldiers & scientists, imagine the biological havoc they would cause on society, all that intellectual brilliance channelled on society, on the loss of their biological roles, instead of as engineers, soldiers & scientists

In a technology based society, women are the first to be discarded, their lack of scientific & mathematical skills are a liability to our technological culture

Women have in fact been stayathome moms for centuries, theyve NEVER had to work for centuries, they have now had centuries of shelter & protection from corporations, theyve had massive amounts of leisure, in fact more leisure then most working males through out history

& what did women do with that leisure, with all that time & opportunity to progress science?

Women became biological luddites, they became entitled, inbred & backwards & technologically liabilities in our present technologically based age

When women should’ve been developing technologies to makeup for their inability to logic & reason, in the same way men developed music & art in order for men to experience emotions, all they did was call for young men to destroying their own futures, to be used as walking wallets & chattle

Women are liabilities, we no longer need women to maintain our social networks, we have everything from mobile phones to the internet

We no longer need them to maintain morality, as theyre incapable of morality, a womans ability to destroy herself, in the same fat women destroy their own bodies, is unprecedented, give a woman enough leisure & freetime, & all she’s capable of is how to enslave all of society, to ensure society does the same for women everywhere, irrespective of the results

Hence welfare, child support, divorce courts, family courts, etc., the list of the self destructive ability of a woman is unlimited

Andybob -
“MRA’s, gamers, gays, straights, male feminists, serial rapists – we’re all the same to the likes of Amanda Marcotte. Years of genuflecting obeyance will not save him from their pitiless scorn.”

“Feminists are talented at alienating people and their staunchest opponents are former allies who have been made rudely aware of their lack of humanity, logic and decency. The Good Men Project was always going to annoy feminists because it involved men. I’m surprised the likes of Ms Marcotte disguised her yearning to stomp all over it for as long as she did.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 16
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 13:27

@Boxer

“Schwyzer is a subhuman piece of shit, even worse than the usual “male feminist” (a phrase something akin to “jewish nazi” lol).

Regards, Boxer”

I’ve always wondered how anybody could make a career, out of exploiting current cultural fads, lecturing women on feminists cant exactly pay that well …

Unless of course he’s a paid shill, in the same way women like Marcotte are paid shills, by the fbi etc

Paid shills get paid in the millions, through bankrolled bookdeals, paid for articles in top newspapers, & of course top paid for placement in search engines

Social engineering public opinion is big money …

Enjoy your new year guys, cheers

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 7
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 13:58

Rmaxd:

I’m reading that book right now (Mencken) — synchronicity!

I don’t know that Schwyzer is a paid shill of some government agency. To me, he just seems like a slimy opportunist, likely the child of a single mom, damaged and fucked up.

Regards, Boxer

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 19
John Northcotte December 26, 2011 at 14:04

I wish Twitter would go out of business or disappear completely. It is for functionally illiterate people to barely communicate with other functionally illiterate people. Whenever I see Twitter exchanges put in a blog such as Spearhead, I can barely comprehend them, but have satisfaction knowing that the illiterates that wrote them probably had nothing to say anyway! Twitter was created for females not men.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 3
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 14:07

Btw women are following the black activism handbook of the 70′s, we saw the same crap happening in the black movement …

Where near the end of the black movement, as the more mainstream, publicly accepted part of black militancy was rejected & debunked, the more radical components of the movement, began attacking its own supporters, in particular the white supporters of black rights, & they also started attacking blacks who were sympathetic to white males

We see the exact same thing happening with feminism, as the more popular & acceptable parts of feminism have now been rejected by popular culture, ie the colossal failure of stayathome dads

They now start becoming more radical, their antagonism & alienation of men, especially manginas & feminists will inevitably destroy them

As we all know women & especially special rights movements, are always self destructive, as the solutions are never radical enough

We all know the women are being bankrolled by the rich upper class

This isnt the first time men’ve been attacked outright

The rich & upper class tried to control men in the 40′s & 50′s by portraying them as emotionless men, unable to feel empathy

ie the weird films about men whittling sticks …. & slap stick comedy which further reinforced the unempathic stereotype through men being slapped & their genitals kicked & violated

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 6
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 14:16

“I’m reading that book right now (Mencken) — synchronicity!

I don’t know that Schwyzer is a paid shill of some government agency. To me, he just seems like a slimy opportunist, likely the child of a single mom, damaged and fucked up.

Regards, Boxer”

Yea, I totally agree he’s an opportunist, I just find it suspicious, he’s been able to get away with murdering & molesting women without feminists attacking him for so long

To me, this is proof the vast majority of feminists are paid shills, why would they let somebody with Schwyzers background be a leading proponent of male feminism?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Days of Broken Arrows December 26, 2011 at 14:40

Boxer wins the prize for posting a Tom Leykis clip. Leykis is due back on the air this coming April, I hear when the terms of his old contract expire. Can’t wait.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Somehow Somewhat December 26, 2011 at 15:42

@aussieguy:
“Where are we? We’re between the 1st and 2nd lines. Expect to face criticism over the years from more feminists. (Probably even the laws of speech be changed, given the way things are going.)”

A law is already in effect in some states that makes it illegal for a man to break up with his girlfriend, move out of cohabitation, or manage the way money is used. The law also makes it illegal for a man to do the same to his wife. It is criminal offense that can lead to imprisonment if a man breaks-up or intends to do so, move out of cohabitation, or limits how the woman can spend HIS money. That is, when a woman is pregnant or thinks to be pregnant: and attributes the actions above as “coercion to abort” the unborn child.

http://www.glennsacks.com/coercive_abortion_prevention.htm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Rmaxd December 26, 2011 at 16:57

“Boxer wins the prize for posting a Tom Leykis clip. Leykis is due back on the air this coming April, I hear when the terms of his old contract expire. Can’t wait.”

I dont think you guys realise, how much of a force Leykis is

When Leykis comes back on radio, the MRA movement will take off into the mainstream

Leykis is THE MRA for the 90′s, he was literally a one man army, he’s literally a radio version of paul elam, & had millions tuning into to his radio station

This guy single handedly took on the feminists in the U.S & won, he mainstreamed mens rights & even popularised women into flashing their tits for his listeners

Leykis understood the importance of PUA to MRA & mens rights, & lets just say he destroyed HUNDREDS of single moms live on air, over the 5 years he was on air, using pua & game

Which is why I think the MRA should actively include PUA, as I’ve seen the power it has over getting men & women, to address mens issues

Never underestimate the power of the TuckerMax crowd

Look at how TuckerMax’s fans boo the feminazi’s & shout the hags down …

“Someone else said it best: “Feminazis holding signs? Angry hipster-emo dudes wearing granny-glasses at an anti-Tucker rally? Police escorts? Max is now an official rockstar. God help us all.””

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCJQwLWjb1Q

Men & Women LOVE ALPHA MALES

Remember it is easier for the manginas & male feminists to follow an ideology through an Alpha male like Leykis & Tuckermax, then it is to practise it

Leykis & Tuckermax have proven the importance of PUA & game to men’s rights

How do you expect men to stand up to women & feminists, if men dont know how to be Alpha & masculine

We live in a feminised society, our FIRST priority is to RE-MASCULISE MEN, in ORDER to do that they HAVE to know how to combat women & feminists in their relationships, by being alpha

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 17:00

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 28
Boxer December 26, 2011 at 17:08

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 26
Eric December 26, 2011 at 18:16

LOL—all Matlack had to do was look around and see for himself just how much women value good men. The good men are all single or sitting in divorce courts; the scumbags and losers are the ones with lots of women and several kids. What did he think this ‘Good Men Project’ would incite other than female contempt?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 2
mgtow December 26, 2011 at 20:44

I think it has been established long ago that ‘The Good Man Project’ does not have the best interests of men. It is just another cleverly packaged ‘Man up!’ misandrist shaming. Same old, same old.

Why would anyone assume the altruism of Mr Matlack is beyond me.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 1
Ray December 26, 2011 at 22:47

Gender feminism and radical feminism have no credibility. They comprise a hate movement with a long history of persecuting and destroying the lives of innocent males as shown in “Witch-Hunting Males” and “Los Misandry” at Youtube. Blow the whistle on them loud and long. :-/
http://tinyurl.com/27oh7cp
http://tinyurl.com/65dpzwu

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
Charles Martel December 26, 2011 at 23:27

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 21
E December 27, 2011 at 02:59

aussieguy

Japan’s herbivore males is another example of such non-cooperation. Both women and government don’t know what to do when males do not cooperate with the societal norm. The best the gyno-centric media did was try to portray them as homosexuals, etc. (Essentially, belittle anyone that doesn’t fit into their ideals…Like outcasts.)

In an honest debate both sides take turns making their points and the audience members decide which arguments are stronger. When one side starts to lose the debate and runs out of points to make they sometimes get desperate and resort to name calling. This is when you know for sure the debate has ended.

The reason why feminists are resorting to name-calling Japan’s herbivores is because frankly they lost debate. Actually I’m not even sure if they attempted to make a debate to begin with, it’s as if they completely skipped step 1 (the debate phase) and went straight to step 2 (name calling).

I have yet to hear feminists try to give their side of the story and explain why the hell should men get married in today’s environment. What’s in it for men?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 1
Rocco December 27, 2011 at 08:48

@ E

I’ve been involved in some negotiations, when two parties are so far apart, it’s really not much use to talk.

IMO, there is no point in men discussing this with women.

I come here to let men know my experience because it’s real and not what the boob tube and media say is going on.

We’re spreading the truth to men.

Men and women disagree on how family, finance, governance and taxation should occur.

IMO, the feminists were smart enough to realize that no amount of talking about it is going to change things.

Men have now been pushed so far that the majority of men no longer support the feminist agenda and women are realizing they were told that freedom meant apeing the Japanize “working man”.

I think men have not been left behind, I think men are a step ahead of women on some issues. If women want to work, I have never met a man that didn’t encourage it, we like extra money and help as much as anyone.

Well, men now have no stake in this society. We aren’t allowed to have children, we mate, babies are born but if we love them, if we show this weakness, they will ruthlessly gut us and put us in the wall-less prison of child alimoney and metered visitation.

Some men actually are put inside cells like animals for the financial benefit of women and the PTB, stealing retirement funds from other family members.

Men, as is their current perogative have started to disengage, not marry and search out ways to reduce the possiblity of accidental pregnancy. At the same time we are searching for new methods of reproduction, like surrogacy, if the yearning for a family should become very strong.

The only thing women can do now is try to use their voting leverage to produce true slavery either by marriage and divorce or incarceration…..or, which is more likely, the re-introduction of work houses and work camps.

The government is about to pass a law that says any man any time can can be incarcerated for “homeland security”…….sound like communist russia or nazi germany……yet I don’t see much discussion on the tv news, just a constant stream of propaganda of women telling men what dangerous animals we are.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 3
aussieguy December 27, 2011 at 09:40

E said…

“I have yet to hear feminists try to give their side of the story and explain why the hell should men get married in today’s environment. What’s in it for men?”

=> Usually, they go with “For Love” or “To grow old with someone” or “You’ll die alone” or “Why don’t they ‘Man Up!’”…They are emotional reasons which mean little to men. (More like women’s justifications to lure men away from the single life. More men on the single path means a bunch of lonely women that have to deal with their biological clock getting louder. Feminism cannot stop Nature.)

* Sex? => Next to none. Maybe once in a while, if you’re lucky and there is planetary alignment between the Earth, Moon, and Mars. (According to my married friends).

* Money? => Gets spent on things he doesn’t need. As well, “What’s yours is hers. What’s hers is hers.” …And if you get divorced? She’s already got you by the financial balls. (Presuming you’re the one that earns the big bucks in the relationship.)

* Kids? => One child is an 18 to 23 year investment in time, money, and patience.

* Legality? => Its a three party contract. You, her, and the Government. The Government sides with her by default. In fact, the rules enable her to use any ridiculous reason for her to win in an event of a divorce. ie: You’re a threat to the children, you were emotionally abusive, etc. (The legal strategy is to make you look like the bad guy in order for her to win. If you react angrily, you’ll reinforce what she has said!)

Its best to stay single, live your life without compromise. No drama. No nonsense. No waste of money or your own resources. For sex? Well, there is always brothels, prostitutes, porn, and masturbation…If you have fame, money, and power: young women and pornstars on top of the previous four.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 10:14

Rocco,

Interesting comment. Can you please identify or post a link to the information about Homeland Security having the right to imprison any man? I assume ‘woman’ is not included in the proposed law to incarcerate? Thanks.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
keyster December 27, 2011 at 10:14

“I have yet to hear feminists try to give their side of the story and explain why the hell should men get married in today’s environment. What’s in it for men?”

Look here buster! We’ve got what you want and that’s a vagina. You’ve consistently demonstrated you will withstand all manner of abuse from us in the desperate hope we might allow you access to it. We have little else to offer, but obviously that’s all we need, as its been proven quite
effective so far.

We’re empowered, independent and sassy, and if you don’t like this version of the modern “gal on the go” that’s just tough, because we’re not going to change for ANY man (unless of course he’s a wealthy athelete or entertainer), YOU’RE the one who has to change. You will adapt to US, accept us for who we’ve courageously become (thanks to feminists who fought for our rights) or you will be denied vaginal access and the opportunity for mortality through the offspring we might have blessed you with.

You need to just Man-Up…not in a domineering jerk kind of way, but as an empathetic, kind, sensitive, understanding and nurturing Co-Partner, who will defer to me in everything (or ELSE!) and withstand my surly attitude in silence, until I eventually lose respect for you and file for divorce.

FEEL THE SHAME for not wanting this!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 4
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 10:29

E,

Thanks for your comments.

“The reason why feminists are resorting to name-calling Japan’s herbivores is because frankly they lost debate”.

— Such a common behavior among feminists (and women) as all MRAs (and men) know from experience. Funny how all women think they have the expertise and acceptance to shift from discussing/debating an issue with a man to pointing out that his views or comments are really an indication of an insecure emotional or biological problem he has with women.(sarcasm off).

“I have yet to hear feminists try to give their side of the story and explain why the hell should men get married in today’s environment. What’s in it for men?”

— So true! The next time a woman complains that most men are only interested in having sex and not in having a real relationship, my response will be to state that women should simply be grateful modern men are still biologically programmed to pursue a women they are sexually attracted to since after all what possible other reasons would a man in modern society want to have any type of relations with a woman?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
oddsock December 27, 2011 at 10:32

Aharon

Your request to Rocco for links.

This is from the Ron Paul website. Perhaps explains the right for indefinite imprisonment without charge reason or legal representation

http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1936:the-ndaa-repeals-more-rights&catid=62:texas-straight-talk&Itemid=69

Excerpt

“Additionally, this legislation codifies in law for the first time authority to detain Americans that has to this point only been claimed by President Obama. According to subsection (e) of section 1021, nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” This means the president’s widely expanded view of his own authority to detain Americans indefinitely even on American soil is for the first time in this legislation codified in law”

Still have faith in your politicians ? Don’t worry, maybe it’s only a conspiracy ????

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 11 Thumb down 18
Boxer December 27, 2011 at 10:40

Hey Aharon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uQiEcw9joLE&feature=related

I can’t speak for Rocco, but this is probably what he’s talking about. Indefinite detention for “terrorism suspects”, a favourite of conservative republicans in the USA.

It’s not too hard to stretch “terror suspects” to people like those that conservative republican shithead Bill Bennett criticises: men like us who do not kiss women’s ass.

Regards, Boxer

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 21
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 10:51

keyster,

That was great. Your ability to play with sarcasm is really high.

“… or you will be denied vaginal access and the opportunity for mortality through the offspring we might have blessed you with”.

— Fortunately, for those men who are ok keeping things purely physical and are still willing to risk having sex there are lots of women who will casually provide it (more than ever thanks to the sexual liberation movement). The modern ‘relationship’ ship has departed the shoreline and is heading into a sea filled with icebergs. Offspring or kids today are really the women’s property with the father servant providing money and services to support the woman in her queendom. Lines of mortality that only a wife/woman/modern witch (sarcasm) can provide might end permanently or can end up rather strange. How would you feel if your child or grandchild became an Adolf Hitler or even worse an Amanda Marcotte?

In terms of my own mortality and spiritual path, I’m focusing on developing my relationship with my own unique definition of God and the infinite. It is usually a different path than what the vast majority of clergy and theologians teach and claim is right and true.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 10:55

oddsock and Boxer,

Thank you for your replies and the links. I have to get off this site now and will look into the links and reply later. Take care.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5
oddsock December 27, 2011 at 11:01

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 17
keyster December 27, 2011 at 11:02

English version of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” flops. Hollywood is vexed. How could a movie about a kick-ass, female assassin avenging her own rape and violence against women by brutally torturing and killing men be so successful in Sweden, but fail miserably in the USA?

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/movies/2011/12/girl-dragon-tattoo-daniel-craig-fincher.html

Because feminist/you go grrl/chick power is jumping the shark in the USA, that’s why.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 28 Thumb down 3
oddsock December 27, 2011 at 11:10

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 21
Boxer December 27, 2011 at 11:16

“Jumping the shark” is a pop-culture reference to an old tee vee show called Happy Days. Television addled idiots and hipsters generally use it.

In one episode, someone was waterskiing and jumped a shark. Despite the glitter and the effects, and despite the temporary increase in viewership, the show was already canned. It’s an aphorism describing something that’s going down the tubes, unbeknownst to everyone (even the principal agents themselves).

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 23
Ethan Blue December 27, 2011 at 11:18

keyster

She hates men, she just hates feminist men a little bit less.

I would bet she hates them more.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 1
Anonymous December 27, 2011 at 11:19

@oddsock

The phrase “Jumping the Shark” was coined when, in a late episode of Happy Days, the Fonze literally jumped a shark while water skiing. It was the episode that forced everyone to realize that Happy Days wasn’t a good show anymore, was using cheap tricks to keep people interested and should go off the air.

The phrase refers to the point where it is plainly seen that a TV show, movement, series, etc. has slid so far downhill that it can almost never recover. It’s not good anymore and should just be put out of its misery.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
Rocco December 27, 2011 at 11:19

@ Aharon

Here ya go:

http://conservativebyte.com/2011/11/senate-moves-to-allow-military-to-arrest-americans-without-charge-or-trial/

I’m not a conservative I just know how our government works.

Osama Obama hasn’t signed it yet, it’s very popular and, most scarry of all, it’s not on the TV…..every shows has men murdering and mutilating women but remove our most basic constitutional rights are not be given the information in the main stream media.

In the US this is how our Overlords do things, it’s “Disney Democracy ™”, a fantasy or imaginary democracy, and btw, I just made that up and take credit for it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
oddsock December 27, 2011 at 11:36

Thanks Boxer. I understand now.

Rocco. Yes an excellent saying, “Disney Democracy” Or even Disneyland Democracy ? Very apt description.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 4 Thumb down 16
Robert December 27, 2011 at 11:37

The fact that feminists have turned against a male feminist is proof of their misandry and sex/gender bigotry/mission/plans. It is proof of their true intentions and ultimate mission; to destroy all of us who have been born with a penis. It is also proof that they are carring out the message of the “S.C.U.M. manifesto and “The Red Stockings Manifesto”. Absolute proof that the feminist movement IS a hate movement and feminism is a hate movement and bogotry. Those who support/endorse/perpetuate, etc. feminism are just as guilty as feminism and it’s ilk/supporters/endorsers, etc. The war on/against men and boys is real.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
Robert December 27, 2011 at 11:39

carrring sould be carrying.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 11:39

Hey all,

I’m popping back in for just a moment. A pro gun blog that I often go to called The Truth About Guns is featuring a piece today called “Self-Defense Tip for Women: Carry a Gun”. The readers are pro gun and very critical of how the mass media, politicians, the universities, and the gun-control nuts misrepresent information, the value of gun ownership, and demonize gun owners. Sound familiar? It should since all you have to do is replace a few words and you get feminists and misogynists.

Those guys are often white knights and are uninformed about the real stats with false rapes, domestic violence mostly being female against male, and that mothers commit more homicide against their kids than dads. Please feel free to drop in and share your insights. Thanks

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2011/12/robert-farago/self-defense-tip-for-women-carry-a-gun/#more-90025

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3
Eric Wolf December 27, 2011 at 13:07

The fact that such an article was even published by Matlack at the GMP is a victory in itself; as is the backlash from scum like Marcotte.

The reaction to the MRA is no different from any other social movement. First ignore it. When it makes enough noise that it must be engaged, demonize and ridicule.

To make more headway the feminist establishment must be engaged on multiple fronts in both the MSM and academia. That is where the Radfems went to subvert society, so that is where MRAs must go to set things right again. It won’t happen quickly or easily, but when calm, well-spoken MRAs engage them in their own strongholds, they will reveal themselves for what they truly are.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 15:06

oddsock, Boxer, and Rocco

Thanks for the comments, replies, and links. I read the articles and read the two pieces. They’re good to be aware of. I’ve been aware of such overall government moves for a long time.

BTW, I’m neither a modern liberal or conservative, and neither am I a libertarian though I will probably vote for Ron Paul. I want a small to medium small government. I do not trust or respect our government. I just want to live long enough to watch modern society and feminism ie the modern police-nanny state collapse. Ideally, I’d like to watch it collapsing while sitting on a hilltop laughing. A good grilled sausage and a micro-brew to enjoy would make the scene perfect.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
Eric December 27, 2011 at 16:30

Robert:
I remember reading a WW2-era book by an ex-Nazi who’d defected to the West during the 1930s. He said that he was at a dinner once with some high-ranking Nazi officials when Goebbels, the Propaganda Minister repeated his oft-used phrase: ‘People will believe any lie if it’s big enough.’ Hitler overheard him and laughed, ‘And let’s not forget, if a truth is big enough, people are just as inclined to disbelieve it.’

The Nazis may have been evil; but nobody can doubt their insights when it came to predicting human nature LOL.

The point here is that all my adult life (I’m 41); women have been telling men that they hate us; how unnecessary we are; how inferior we are; and then backing up those words with action: divorce, broken homes, abuse of males, etc. Yet, just like the Western leaders who couldn’t believe that the Nazis were plotting another world war, world conquest, and the imposition of a ‘master race’ (in spite of the fact that they continually stated those were their exact intentions); there are clods like Matlack who STILL believe that American women are a lot of Disney princesses looking for their Prince Charming; and that feminist ideology and indoctrination really doesn’t mean exactly what it says it does.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 2
Aharon December 27, 2011 at 16:46

Eric,

Well said! It is really weird how women feel entitled and that it is acceptable to say loudly in public that they hate men. Yet, if men state constructive criticism of many modern women’s behavior and of feminism, suddenly men are labeled a misoginist as if 1) it is a logical conclusion and connection to the criticism (usually it is not) and 2) being a misoginist is unacceptable and shows weakness and bigotry unlike a misandrist which is acceptable and shows strength and independent thinking. Then women wonder why men increasingly want nothing to do with them. Go figure.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 5
Robert December 28, 2011 at 05:09

Eric December 27, 2011 at 16:30

Aharon December 27, 2011 at 16:46

Well put.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
Rmaxd December 28, 2011 at 21:57

lol Whats with all the downvotes for boxer …

Boxer i think the vaginas dont like your posts … spamming down votes is a compliment ladies …

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 11
Boxer December 29, 2011 at 07:42

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 18
Rumour December 29, 2011 at 08:07

@ WF Price – “The problem is that they are listening to what women say, and not watching what they do. ”

The contradictory message of women is exactly why there is no mutual foundation for communication between men and women. And exactly why engaging them on websites is an exercise in futility.

Our message is for the men still in the dark.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
Rmaxd December 29, 2011 at 20:48

@Boxer

Yea, i’ve been noticing plenty of pro-MRA comments & basically ppl expressing their views, getting downvoted for no reason …

Their not exactly changing anyones minds by downvoting their comments … pointless

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4
Jack Donovan December 29, 2011 at 23:25

I noticed “risible” right away while reading that, too.

It’s just poor writing, from someone who wants people to see how smart they are. It’s like carrying War & Peace with you on the bus, hoping someone will see you pretend to read it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
Art Vandelay December 30, 2011 at 00:20

@rugcernie @amandamarcotte no, it’s not one organization. A loose and disparate movement of the deadbeat and the desperate
hugoschwyzer 8 days ago

Didn’t Schwyzer write an article once about how he may have fathered a child and he and the mother plotted to have another man pay and care for the child? Isn’t that the definition of deadbeat? The attempted murder is just the icing on the turd cake of things that asshole can get away with. He even told his employer and they kept him? Isn’t sleeping with your female students also “rape” in feminist terms, using a position of authority and all that… You gotta give him credit though, he almost seems like a very elaborate con job.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0
Domi December 30, 2011 at 01:09

I love the idea that women have been stay-at-home mums for centuries. Nooo, RICH women have been, to an extent. A very small proportion of the population.

This is why everyone should study history *headdesk*

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Rmaxd December 30, 2011 at 10:50

@Domi

So how many women went to work in the coal mines, while theyre husbands stayed at home … ? lol

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
santel December 30, 2011 at 11:24

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 16
Boxer December 30, 2011 at 13:17

santel: you got a source for female coal miners? post it. i’d love to read it.

Regards, Boxer

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 4
oddsock December 30, 2011 at 13:24

Santel

What absolute tosh. What history books have you been reading ? The feminist revised and wishful thinking version ?

The pit women were mainly employed to guide the pit ponies pulling coal along tracks coming out of the mines. The vast majority of women were employed sorting/sifting the coal on the conveyor belts and all the other surface support jobs. As ever, it was the men and young boys that had to do the most dangerous and labourous work in the pits such as digging and blasting new excavations drilling for Methane. Women were hardly ever allowed down the pit, they were just not built for it or had enough common sense to keep themselves out of harms way.

You idiot.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
Boxer December 30, 2011 at 14:18

Hey Oddsock:

Thanks. I suspected Santel might have been talking about Welsh or maybe South American mining, so didn’t want to scare him/her off.

Miners (of coal and everything else) in the USA and Canada have been 100 percent male since the industrial revolution until the present, according to every single record I’ve been able to peruse. As a historian I’m always looking for exceptions, though.

Ever read about the mining wars (Big Bill Haywood) in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, British Columbia? That was Big Bill Haywood. Something similar happened among miners in Appalachia earlier than this — striking miners were anarchists and communists who wore red sashes (the origin of the derisive term “redneck”). These were the original man’s men, who stood up for other men and told the feminist state to shove it. If there were any women among these hypermasculine dudes who got any job done, no matter how filthy, I’d love a reference.

Regards, Boxer

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3
oddsock December 30, 2011 at 15:51

No problem Boxer.

My home town here in the UK is a former coal mining town as are the surrounding towns. My good friend is a former Miner or as he puts it “A Pit Mon”. Quite a few of my Uncles were ” Pit Mon”. Therefore I am well aware of the coal mining history. Sadly, after Maggie Thatcher closed them all down they have now been filled in landscaped and turned into country walks. My town is also famous for Rugby League. For years it was a semi professional part time sport. A brutal sport even today. One of the key players is called a prop forward, a huge guy used to batter his way through the defence to gain ground. The term “Prop” comes from the huge wooden pit props used to hold up the mine shaft roof. Many men would finish a shift down the pit and then go and train or play a game of Rugby and to add to the pain and discomfort, it was, way back then, a winter sport.

Have you ever read or even heard of the Tolpuddle Martyrs or read The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists ? It is a novel by Robert Tressell first published in 1914 after his death in 1911. It used to be called the socialists bible. As with the Miners Union, these guys actually had the real masculinity and balls to stand up against tyranny and fight for the good of the little guy family and his community.

It’s amazing to read so many people that appear totally unaware that if it was not for these guys and the stance they took, they would not have the working conditions they have today and I mean in the developed world not just the UK.

Sadly, todays Socialism/Labour Conservative Liberal Democrats are all one and the same. Much the same as Republicans and Democrats in your country.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 4
American January 1, 2012 at 16:02

Wow, I just discovered Tom leykiss; thanx boxer. This guy is totally the real deal. A man who is not “Broken”, and will stand and deliver his message!!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 3
Jean Valjean January 1, 2012 at 17:40

I don’t have any sympathy for Matlack. He played both sides of the coin and now he’s reaping his reward. I’ve been to GMP. It’s a haven for radical feminists to run roughshod over discussions so they can program men to become “good men”. The feminists are allowed to bait, insult, demean, dehumanize males without restriction and the men are allowed to comment until they think they can return the favor or hammer home a point so succinctly that they get a polite letter from Joanna Schroeder explaining why he’s been banned from posting.

Even the name GMP is insulting. The notion that men are good or bad based on whether or not they are willing to be ruled by women is a sexist dichotomy that dehumanizes any male who disagrees before he’s even tapped out a word.

GMP is nothing more than an attempt at crass comercialism. Luring men into a discussion they can never win because they will never be allowed to express themselves fully but in the meantime, while they are trying to make a difference, why don’t you click on the penile enlargement ad in the corner because clearly if you are on GMP you are an insecure man-child with a tiny dick.

Congratulations Tom Matlack. You’ve succeeded in being despised by both feminists and MRA’s.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Rmaxd January 1, 2012 at 19:15

“when it became a more lucrative job, as more and more coal started to be needed, that men began to replace women. as usual.”

& Santel like the good feminist retard still laughably manages to blame men, for dying in coal mines & women staying at home …

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Venom Froggy January 6, 2012 at 02:22

Yet another male feminist ruthlessly disposed of by his feminist “sisters” for failing to fulfill their expectations without fail.

What a sucker.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Robert St. Estephe June 16, 2012 at 15:46

I can’t blame a successful TV-conditioned man for displaying ordinary tendencies of chivalry, trying to please everyone, especially a “diversity” of women, by walking unarmed into a nest of sociopathic authoritarian cultural marxists, and getting mauled mercilessly. This is how most of us start out. It takes time to grow. It takes time to deprogramme oneself. It takes time to read all those reports showing how the government programs are in fact based on utterly fraudulent “studies.” It takes time to develop the willingness to look objectively to all those “losers” and “whiners” of the second “gender” who have , it is embarrassing to admit, have allowed their children to be kidnapped and/or brainwashed, have let themselves be caged by ethics-free employees of the authoritarian state on false accusations, who have been robbed blind, have been poisoned, have been shot, who have been slashed by, it is embarassing to say, members of the “nonviolent” sex.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: