Orthodox Heterodoxy and the Tragedy in Norway

by W.F. Price on July 27, 2011

Yesterday evening, I stopped by the local vigil for the Norwegian victims of Anders Breivik’s rampage. It was held at the Nordic Heritage museum in Ballard, which is Seattle’s Scandinavian neighborhood. The event was attended by hundreds of people, as Seattle is still home to many Norwegian nationals and people of Norwegian ancestry (I am part Norwegian myself). Norwegian Consul Kim Nesselquist was there, as were Dr. Loren Anderson, the president of Pacific Lutheran University, and a couple Lutheran pastors. It was a Lutheran service, including prayers, some singing and music, a speech by the consul and what was essentially a sermon by the president of PLU.

It was a heartfelt vigil, especially for the Norwegian Consul, whose voice broke as he expressed gratitude to the people of Seattle. It is saying something when a Norwegian man expresses such emotion. To me, what was most touching was hearing the churchgoing women around me sing Amazing Grace in soft tones.

I looked around at the largely Scandinavian crowd, seeing a couple people I recognized, and felt very much at home, despite the fact that I was raised Catholic. Although emotions were subdued, as is the Scandinavian custom, the sense of grief was real and palpable.

My own feelings about the vigil and the tragedy in Norway were those of resignation. Having worked for years cataloging countless atrocities and massacres in the volatile Middle East and other conflict areas, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of inevitability about the killings. When I first heard about it, it struck me immediately that it was a sectarian slaughter, the likes of which occur on a regular basis in places such as Kashmir, Northwest Frontier Province in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, etc.

As I listened to Loren Anderson give his sermon, endorsing the lofty liberal ideals of FDR, imploring us to cherish diversity and individualism, and to contemplate the balance between freedom and responsibility, I felt nostalgia rather than hope. The days when these ideals worked tolerably well are drawing to an end.

Dr. Anderson, president of a university, is clearly a proponent of the liberal orthodoxy that has prevailed in the West since WWII, and is the only true bond that unites the elites of our civilization.

In a society that mirrors the demographics of the people I saw yesterday evening, it is a humane, progressive and functional governing philosophy, but in its endorsement of cultural heterodoxy (i.e. diversity and multiculturalism) it contains the seeds of its own destruction. It is essentially a program of atomization and dissolution in the name in the name of freedom and individualism on the one hand, and a heavy-handed repression of any communal resistance to it on the other. The result is that all balance and natural restraint is thrown to the wind, and political and social movements take on the character of tribalism, which is the default (and savage) form of social organization amongst human beings.

Therefore, we have an elite that not only endorses, but actively strives to create a society that lacks cohesion, is suspicious of others in its midst, and necessarily takes an adversarial position over any and all differences. Is it any wonder that some depraved individual may take this to its extreme conclusion and attempt to wipe out the next generation of his perceived rivals? How, in a “diverse, multicultural society” full of competing interests could we expect there to be a sense of obligation to one’s neighbors, let alone compatriots?

I know how, but it’s nothing like what the Western elites have in mind. In the kind of society they are busy creating, the only solution to endless conflict is an overriding, supreme ideology of some sort, such as Islam, Communism, Christianity or Imperial China’s emperor worship. But they will have none of this. Inevitably, the proposed solution will be more heterodoxy, more multiculturalism — more tribalism in short. And they, and we, and everyone else around us, will get it.

Look to a West that increasingly resembles a sectarian frontier; the kind of place Osama bin Ladin lived out the final years of his life. When the resources of the state dwindle, it will be a much harder place to handle than it used to be.

{ 73 comments… read them below or add one }

Opus July 27, 2011 at 13:46

As a result of the massacre, it is easy to jump to one simple conclusion as to the cause – and then set about eliminating that cause, whatever it may be. We had one half-witted attempt on the previous thread. What the massacre does say to me is that there are a lot of people in the West, who are very unhappy about what is being forced on them. What I wonder, is whether this will prove to be a one-off or whether we are at the point where – as those who oppose diversity and equality are regularily insulted and abused, and made to feel as if they are failures as humans being repressed in varying ways – it will be the starting gun for further atrocities. In this respect Feminism being one of the Left’s Scared Cows, one recalls the violence only a few weeks ago of Thomas Ball, though that was immolation.

Having said that, profits of doom (like in the U.K. with his Rivers of Blood speech from 1967, the late Enoch Powell), have proved to be completely wide of the mark – so far.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 1
DogFace Soldier July 27, 2011 at 13:51

I can’t say I was surprised that the president of PLU used this tragedy as a way to push political propaganda. I wish people could put aside their political views for a few seconds and mourn the deaths of fellow human beings.

At the heart of multiculturalism exists an idea that an culture influenced mainly by white people must be inferior. Americans who want immigrants to learn English are called ignorant racists. California passed the “Dream Act” which gives financial aid to illegal immigrants. The majority of immigrants who have come to America refuse to fly the American flag. There was an incident involving a young boy in California who wanted to fly a small American flag on the back of his bike. After complaints from mexican immigrants, the boy was forced to remove the flag. I can’t believe the audacity of some of these people. They expect us to roll out the red carpet and cater to them.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 60 Thumb down 2
Rebel July 27, 2011 at 13:56

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 39
TheOrangeOne July 27, 2011 at 15:04

Some views must be shared and accepted among the general populace in order to be any order at all. To allow “diversity” to such an extent, it draws conflict and chaos to reign. You can’t have both sides of an issue meet some golden mean that satisfies everyone. It’s just not possible. Either pick one or the other. But a lot of our courts today just want to play the apathy card and let other people decide for them, or for others. Unexpectedly those decisions mostly fall on wives and mothers today. Abortion, alimony, children, divorce, and false blackmail accusations are just a few main decisions they make as if it’s just a normal everyday thing. Many of them abuse their court-sponsored power in full force and no one blinks an eye, like co-workers or neighbors or friends. It’s like how slavery was viewed as simply part of life in the south, or in the ancient world, where masters decided the fates of others and no one thought anything wrong of it.

It also reminds me of the shit Scientology was doing and the courts allowed them to hide behind the religion card like crazy (just google scientology and the legal system), yet won’t let foster parents follow a particular religion’s views on say gays. Yes, that’s right, they won’t allow them to be foster parents if they follow a particular religion. It’s bullshit like this tolerated in the name of “diversity” that’s killing all logical chain of thought within our governments, where everyone wants to do their own thing with how they interpret what should be allowed or not.

This is why big countries like the U.S. and Russia are in chaos socially as everyone fights each others’ views in a constantly changing legal game every four to eight years. I myself know how crazy it is in just my own state of California. It sometimes makes me just want to bang my head against the wall of the shit that happens here. Especially when the presidential candidates fight for our votes like vultures. Fucking hell.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
Quartermain July 27, 2011 at 15:22

I tend to define multi-culturalism as the supplanting of a multitude of cultures, for a corporate, consumerist, Pseudo culture.

The Western and Muslim world are a grand example of good fences making for good neighbors. No boundaries mean more conflicts.

The U.S. and Mexico is another example.

The AIC (assholes in charge), the governments, schools, the media, etc. are keep trying to socially engineer the world all over.

I have a fore-boding feeling that we haven’t seen anything yet.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 15:39


Marc Rudov telling it very succinctly. Its a while ago…but everything he says is true.


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 4
Anonymous July 27, 2011 at 15:58

Recently I googled “white politics” and found some scary stuff, like for example “your skin is your uniform” being said in terms of a possible race war.

The ruling class WANT the people being ruled over to bicker with each other, so we all (any “uniform”) are distracted from the REAL enemy, the ruling class. What they want is America to be one giant plantation with the ruling class in an enclave of mansions and everyone else dirt poor. The ruling class have implimented the gist of the Willie Lynch Speech of 1714 made by a slave owner on fostering divisiveness.

But if such an ethnic civil war ensues, the winning ethnic group will then go after the rulers. They had better be prepared to drive a starship to Pandora!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 4
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 16:35

It is estimated that 4,000 men a year kill themselves in murder by proxy by women and the guvment.

4,000 divided by 52? 77.

In Australia a tragedy like what just happened in Norway happens every week.

No one cares.

Well? Unless men care about THEMSELVES and are ready to help the MAN NEXT TO THEM? They should STFU and stop whining.

You think Obama cares? David Cameron cares? Julia Gillard cares? Fill in the name of your national leader cares?

No f***ing way do ANY of these people care.

But golly gee wizz…..a man shoots a few people and suddenly the WHOLE WORLD CARES?

Thomas Ball immolates himself.

No one cares.

A few nazi wannabe leftists in training put their by their parents are killed by a man and SUDDENLY EVERYONE CARES?

That is how worthless men are.

Man and wyman myth has an updated video for you.


Personally? I care about those people killed in Norway this week EXACTLY as much as Australians care about the estimated 4,000 men who are killed every year in Australia in murder by proxy.

That is NOT AT ALL.

And don’t people HATE their indifference to mens suffering to be reflected back at them.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 6
Herbal Essence July 27, 2011 at 16:38

It seems like more people are starting to get that the fake, social engineering multiculturalism pushed on us by the Powers That Be has nothing to do with respect, peace, or tolerance. The last few days I have had refreshingly substantive and astute conversations with some friends regarding multiculturalism. These friends are very bright, but they tend to have more mainstream viewpoints so I was happy to hear their astute opinions on it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 17:29
Anonymous July 27, 2011 at 17:49

More and more people will realize that the whole point of “multiculturalism” is to generate self-sustaining divisiveness. Unless or until one can change their ethnic appearance as easily as hair style, the divisiveness will persist. That Willie Lynch predicted that the effects would last centuries. What divisiveness does, of course, is to prevent the ruled-over from unifying by causing perpetual bickering.

Gotta keep the divisiveness going! And going and going and going….

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 18:08

Rebel July 27, 2011 at 13:56
“My heart goes out to the families and friends of the innocent victims. ”

What a croc of shit.

Those who were killed were not “innocent victims” in the main. Anders Breivik is as sane as the next man. The attempts to label him “insane” are a joke. Attempts to label him insane is idiots clutching at straws.

Ditto for calling this an “act of terrorism”. It was not. Anders Breivik has made this clear. This was an act of war and he considers himself a soldier. In different times, as in WW II, he would be called a hero.

The people he killed were the children of those who had betrayed him and his fellow norwegians. I would put forward the opinion that the political leaders are responsible for the war on men and the destruction of the families of men. What could be more “an eye for an eye” than to kill the children of those who were so willing to destroy mens families and destroy the homeland of men?

In killing children of those who are betraying men? He is sending a very clear message.

“You may think you are protected by your police and your security…..but we can find your children…and you can not protect them except by locking them into a secure area.”

Imagine if men said “Who gives a toss about Obama. He has security to burn….but his daughters don’t and can’t. And if Obama is so willing to deprive us of our children as the commander in chief as he is so want to remind us? Maybe he would see things differently if he were deprived of HIS children?”

Men are well advised to start asking such questions…….Aloud.

How many men have been deprived of their children since Obama came to be president? And does ANYONE believe he does not have the ability to IMMEDIATELY END the criminal legislation being used against men? After all…he is a nobel peace price winner, right? Surely he can bring about peace between men and women in the US by making women lawfully responsible for their crimes? Right? Surely he can instruct his judges to actually, you know, apply the LEGISLATION.

And did Anders Breivik fire the first shot in his war? No. He didn’t. The first shot was fired when he was but a babe in arms…..when his mother was able to steal him away from his father despite his fathers efforts to be in his life.

Anders Breivik notes in his comments how he was ‘feminised’ by his society….and he notes “cultural marxism” which we know as feminism as what he is in a war to stop…and he notes ‘multi-culturalism’ which we know as tolerance to everyone EXCEPT white heteosexual males as what he is in a war to stop.

These “innocent victims” of whom you speak are the children of those who are criminals. And since Anders Breivik could not get to the REAL criminals he went after the children. Is that such a bad idea? Are they not legitimate targets if the primary targets can not be reached? After all? Obama, Gillard, Cameron? They and their predecessors come after YOUR children….don’t they? Why not give these criminals a taste of their own medicine and see how they like it…which they won’t.

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you” is not real popular with the Obamas, Camerons, Gillards of the world.

You may be interested to note. I just wrote an email to a Norwegian woman who is just a bit younger than me with two daughters the same age as my former children, now 20 and 18.

When she and her family moved to Dublin in 2001 I made special point of making them welcome and introducing them to our circle of friends as I had been so recently hosted in Norway. I even knew enough norwegian to talk to them and make jokes in Norwegian. This woman then openly supported my ex commit crimes against me. That is how I was rewarded for my efforts to make her and her family as at home as possible in Dublin.

In part I wrote.

“Now you and your norwegian countrymen have had a little taste of what the results of hatred of men and the marginalisation of men leads to? Maybe you might want to look at just how much western women are hating on men.”

“Your massacre in Norway is directly linked to the marginalisation of men and the fact that men are treated as second class citizens in their own country. You will note the guy killed exclusively leftists. The same people who promote impunity of crimes for women against men, unmitigated immigration, high taxes to steal from men and to gift to women. The children he killed were well selected targets. They were the children of the people who have betrayed him his entire life.”

“You want to know who drove this man to kill so many Norwegians? Look in the mirror. And consider you are a woman who condoned crimes against a man by a criminal woman. Consider you are one of the women who alienated men in your country.”

“You want to know who is responsible for the slaughter in Norway this week? Check the mirror. And talk to your other women who have been so happy to commit crimes against men or condone crimes against men.”

She will probably just delete my email as “rantings of a crazy man” and make no connection at all as to the alienation of Anders Breivik and the willingness of women to condone crimes against men.

This shit has to stop. And there is no sign that women will stop it. So it is up to men to stop it.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 35 Thumb down 32
Reactionary_Konkvistador July 27, 2011 at 18:13

I found it interesting that ABB comments on the following in his manifesto (page 1179):

Marriage – why “no-fault” divorce is one of our most dangerous social experiments

No-fault divorce laws were introduced in Western Europe and other industrialised countries during the 1970s and are being expanded into other regions of the world today. The spouse who divorces or otherwise abrogates the marriage contract incurs no liability for the costs or consequences, creating a unique and unprecedented legal anomaly. In all other areas of contract law those who break a contract are expected to compensate their partner, but under a system of ‘no fault’ divorce, this essential element of contract law is abrogated.”

In fact, the legal implications go farther, since the courts actively assist the violator. The law generally supports the spouse seeking the divorce, even if that spouse was the wrongdoer.” “No-fault” did not really remove fault, therefore; it simply allowed judges to redefine it however they pleased. It introduced the novel concept that one could be deemed guilty of violating an agreement that one had, in fact, not violated. According to
therapeutic precepts, the fault for marital breakup must be shared, even when one spouse unilaterally seeks a divorce. Many husbands and wives who did not seek or want divorce were stunned to learn that they were equally ‘at fault’ in the dissolution of their marriages.

While lamenting the high divorce rate is conventional piety among family advocates, most have refused to challenge the divorce laws. The standard rationalisation is that to control divorce we must first change the culture. But no one suggests that changing the culture is a prerequisite for preventing, say, abortion. While cultural forces certainly contribute, the divorce epidemic has proceeded directly from a legal system which permits and even encourages it.
Furthermore, it is only because traditional understandings of marriage have already been severely undermined that homosexuals are now laying claim to it. Gays to do not want marriage in the traditional mold (1950 version marriage), only the watered-down version
that exists today.


To truly reverse the decline of the family, the momentum must be carried forward to
confront the current destructive matriarchal policies that have institutionalised “broken
family” policies. Our current system produces broken families and prevents traditional
norms based on discipline. The most direct threat to the family is “divorce on demand”.
Sooner or later, if Western Europe is to endure, it must be brought under control. The
father/patriarch must be given considerably more influence as this is the only way to
ensure the survival of the nuclear family as it will enhance family integrity. The
matriarchal supremacy within the modern households must seize to exist.
As of now, the mother will always be awarded child custody rights unless she is mentally
ill or a drug/alcohol addict. The system must be reformed so that the father will be
awarded custody rights by default. This will ensure that that divorce rate will be
significantly reduced (by up to 50-70%) and will contribute to uphold the nuclear family.

Gender based affirmative action in the public and private sector must seize

Qualifications must be the only requirement and nothing else.
In extreme Marxist dictatorships such as Norway, they have implemented affirmative
action policies which require all publicly listed corporations to have at least a 40% share
of females in their company boards. Companies that do not comply get fined.


He also writes a lot about feminism, the feminization of boys, disintegration of society, the sexual dystopia ect.

A sad world we live in that this is more likley to be found in the manifesto of a mass killer than the editorial of a major newspaper.

I don’t approve of his horrific inexcusable act, but it is hard to deny he has stared into the ugly face of modern society and painted it a lovely portrait. He stared at the pox ridden whore and she stared right back at him. Fighting the monster, became a monster, yet here we are collectively hiding from the monster hoping that it won’t hurt us if we look at it. I’m going to take a brake with the approved line, no this guy wasn’t congenitally violent or unreasonable or unfixable. He was also not “crazy” as in being unable to use his intellect and think rationally.

Academics today love to blame society for criminals ignoring nature and personal responsibilities, well *I* blame this society for this criminal. This man would have been an upstanding citizen and good human being in a healthy society, perhaps a loving father and faithful husband, certainly a productive entrepreneur and keen intellect (this he has proven to still posses).

He is a monster. But he is their monster. He is the modern states reflection. And this is why we all shudder at the sight, deep down we all know despite our verbose dissent, we are still part of the system that made him. That is why in a small way, a way the mainstream can never understand, he is our monster too. As long as wee keep paying the pox ridden whore to stalk out there in the dark where others dare not look.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 56 Thumb down 2
Lorne July 27, 2011 at 18:34

It matters not how well Arabs assimilate in Norway. They are still Arabs, and they no more belong in Norway on a regular, settled basis than Norwegians do in the Arab lands. The Arabs can build their wonderful, high culture in Arabia.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 18:43

Reactionary_Konkvistador July 27, 2011 at 18:13
“He is a monster. But he is their monster.”

Why is he a monster and not, as he claim, a soldier?

Plenty of servicemen from the US and UK dropped incendiary bombs on residential areas in Germany that were of no military importance at all in WW II. Remember. I live in Germany. I have read all about these bombings of mass slaughter that your guvments hide from you.

Once one understands that WW II was a manufactured conflict and that it was intended to destroy the men of germany just as surely as feminism is to destroy the men of the west? Once you realise the REAL war criminals of WW II were NOT the germans but the men of USSA/USSAK etc? Once you realise that you are ALL being played for fools?

THEN you might wake up a bit.

Last friday night we had our annual summmer party for a client here in Germany. As luck would have it I sat at a table with a “work experience student” who was only 19 years of age. I mean born in 1992. Yet this young lad talked extensively of his “shame” that Germany had started the war and had killed so many jews. He spoke of it as if he had been shoving Jews into the ovens himself. Because I was at a client function I was obliged not to speak of the broader issues. I let it pass.

The point I want to make is this. German men, and boys, are emasculated and indoctrinated with the idea that they are somehow to blame for what Hitler and crew did even if they are born 50 years later. They feel in themselves something of the “monster” when they are anything but. This lad was just a nice yound lad trying to find out what he has an aptitude and desire to do for working life. That he feels he must “confess” the sins of his forefathers in WW II to some Australian he has just met at a social function is a terrible burden for him to carry around.

I do not see Anders Breivik as a “monster” at all. Indeed? With the total FAILURE of ANYONE to listen to what men have to say? What other options did he have? You think if he TALKED to his guvment about these issues he might have had some success? Oh? Just like MRAS have success talking to guvments I guess, eh?

I would point out. People like Bob Geldof and Alex Baldwin have championed the cause of men and exposed the criminality of the family law courts and the politicians. No dice. Bob Geldoff even did a lengthy BBC documentary where he OPENLY called the family law courts a criminal cartel and a stain on society. hhhmmmm. And he is even a “Sir”.

I have issued lawful notices to all federal and SSW state politicians in Australia letting them know of their crimes. Its not like politicians do NOT know they are criminals. They are fully aware they are criminals.

In the face of criminals committing crimes and there being no course to justice? It is not a “monster” who takes the law into his own hands and dispenses summary justice.

That is what a patriot does.

Some will call Anders Breivik a monster.

Some will call him a patriot.

One thing is for sure. Whatever you call Anders Breivik? You have to label the “so called leaders” of all western countries MUCH WORSE if you are to judge people by the number of those they murder. There is no western leader who is not responsible for more than 76 deaths of men due to criminally unlawful legislation.

ALL western leaders are above Anders Breivik in the killing and criminal stakes. More men should wake up to this.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 19
Anonymous July 27, 2011 at 20:46

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 26
Tribute July 27, 2011 at 21:38

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 24
gender foreigner July 27, 2011 at 21:40

Good discussion.

I can tell you that as a white, Anglo Saxon, anglophone (English speaker as first language), heterosexual, domestically born, Christian male, I have nowhere to plug into in the frauenreich of Canada, etc.

Everytime I read of the, “progress” of an alma mater or anything else, it is an account of yet another non-me group which got various government grants being an in group. When I speak with retired policemen, I hear private accounts of how there are the French officers’ association, black officers’ association, Aboriginal officers’ association, women officers’ association, etc. officers’ association but never the male officicers’ association nor the white officers’ association nor the English officers’ association.

Multiculturalism is the dishonest way of accounting of the donut which is sculped to have at its centre a hole. And by way of EVERY category, I’m in the hole. There is not place for me: there are only places against me. Not only am I a gender foreigner, I am a race foreigner, language foreigner, ethnic foreigner, place-of-birth foreigner, religious foreigner and gender-orientation foreigner (and, of course, I am an ideological foreigner–being no lefty, no Feminist, no commie…).

The in groups adore the donut: I have the hole. The ingroups hate the hole occupants: I hate the hole. I cannot change my stripes: I am fixedly out, without redress.

In the case of Canada, lefty/commie/Feminist/disloyal/republican Pierre Trudeau was pushing French down the country’s population and various ethnic groups resisted. In order to bribe them to shut up and go away, he reacted by creating, “Multiculturalism” (handouts for ethnic/language complainers who were not Anglos nor Anglophone per se).

He did not seek to integrate those groups: he sought to appease them with expediency, an expediency which Feminist-government debt increasingly makes increasingly impossible.

Pierre Trudeau hated the Angloes as well as the Anglophones. He did not so much as construct a donut: but he did construct a hole. French is used to exclude the English from various employment (competence doesn’t matter: FRENCH LANGUAGE matters).

I could go on and on.

Multiculturalism is just another tool of Feminists to exclude target groups. Multiculturalism really Multihateism, and I’m at the centre of it (by way of being the Multitarget). I hate it.

I prefer civilization.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 1
gender foreigner July 27, 2011 at 21:44

Dear DogFace Soldier July 27, 2011 at 13:51:

In a number of the women’s government schools, the present national anthem, “O Canada” is not even used because it, “might offend some groups.” If such groups are offended, then they shouldn’t have come here in the first place.

Let’s face it: the outs are the ins and the ins are the outs. Period. (And in that same spirit, on November 11 Remembrance Day ceremonies, “Mother Earth” is celebrated and honored Feministly and students parade why they should do/do do various things to save the mothe god–and the USA and UK, etc. are blamed for their awful doings against the,”innocent Jaspanese”–same old, same old…)

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 1
gender foreigner July 27, 2011 at 21:50

The aim of the various Feminist-correct programs and ideological strivings is obviously the breaking down of social cohesion so that societies and governments cannot present substantive resistance to behind-the-scenes governing bodies. Here, I must express agreement with Henry Makow (who recognizes both Hebrew and Gentile servants of Satan in this matter).

The strategy of those forces is to break down the essential ability to resist (the man, especially the white man). To do such, they support the woman, especially the nonwhite woman. Titus 2 is opposed and Eve is encouraged to disobey her husband and obey the snake and the sequel to the Garden of Eden having been turned into a Garden of Weeds is constructed.

Isaiah 3 is quite telling (the message being paraphrased that women and children rule over the men). Such is a hell of a world, just as Satan wants it as do his servants, those all-too-obedient Eves everywhere.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 4
Chevy Chase July 27, 2011 at 23:08

You can try to lay blame but the truth is there always was, there always has been and there may always be homocidal psychopaths wandering the planet. Even if you gave these narcisstic fuckwads everything their screwed up brains desired, they’d still find some bullshit political/religious reason to murder people on a mass scale because that is how people like Breivik get their hard on. He is not a soldier. He is not a hero. He is a just a loony psycho murderer of children. God help the parents of those he killed.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 27
Taqman July 28, 2011 at 00:27


The victims weren’t children, their ages ranged from older teenagers through early thirties.

Just because you have to pay child support up until they are 21 and they are on your health insurance to 26, doesn’t make them children despite what the media says

Young adult is a more appropriate term to describe those who were shot.

These people were politically active and not innocent victims like children caught in a burning day care center.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Turbo the Drycleaner July 28, 2011 at 00:33

I have never understood ‘diversity’ or ‘multiculturalism’ since the main message of both seems to be, “Everybody is different, but don’t you dare act like it.”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Maaldweb July 28, 2011 at 00:35


Fellow Alt-Righter. Welcome to The Spearhead!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 2
Ryu July 28, 2011 at 01:00

That’s the problem right there.

“I looked around at the largely Scandinavian crowd, seeing a couple people I recognized, and felt very much at home…. ”

You felt at home because you were surrounded by other whites, other Norweigens. It is of course shocking and appalling, but even white men have a racial and tribal identity. It feels fantastic to be around men and women or our own race and kind. You would not have felt that at a group of Somalians, or Iraqis.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 3
evilwhitemalempire July 28, 2011 at 03:01

off topic
Looks like the dems may have found a way to keep the gravy train running. (At least until China finally decides they’ve had enough.)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
DCM July 28, 2011 at 03:24

“Ryu July 28, 2011 at 01:00

That’s the problem right there.

“I looked around at the largely Scandinavian crowd, seeing a couple people I recognized, and felt very much at home…. ”

You felt at home because you were surrounded by other whites, other Norweigens. It is of course shocking and appalling, but even white men have a racial and tribal identity. It feels fantastic to be around men and women or our own race and kind. You would not have felt that at a group of Somalians, or Iraqis.”

Why is it a “problem” for white people to like being with other white people but a good and wonderful thing for other ethnic groups to feel the same about themselves?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 5
Lovekraft July 28, 2011 at 04:07

Pretty soon, as Political Correctness runs its course, everyone will be under suspicion. The only two classes will be “Professional Victims” and “Oppressor”.

Guess which side white males will be on?

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 4
MWPeak July 28, 2011 at 04:39

Violence of the kind commited in Norway and other places is a unique entity, a separate place of sheer evil. Once a man or woman steps into that realm (and I’ll include male sexual mutilation), they have left behind any and all justifiable reasons and reason all together.

This kind of unfettered bloodshed is something else entirely. It is a genuine evil and has always been with mankind and it simply waits for an excuse, be it religion, revenge or revolution.

Even in a tribal mindset, there are soldiers who fight for their tribe and for specific ends, but that is war and war is not simple wholesale slaughter.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 11
criolle johnny July 28, 2011 at 05:33

Chevy Chase
There IS a cure for a mad dog. You shoot the poor son of a bitch and bury him.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
SingleDad July 28, 2011 at 06:32

IMO this guy was crazy.

IMO diversity encouragement or immigration is unnecessary and creates resentment in the non-immigrant community.

Innevitably these “diversity” programs are reverse racism and sexism and the resentment of these injustices becomes the focus of the anti-immigration political forces.

Any and all groups then point to these “diversity” programs and says, oh yeah, see, *.* group gets into college more.

Similar to how we now complain that women make up the majority at college yet still get set asides due to affirmative action and special women only scholarships.

Or women living longer and then getting the most funding for gendered research like breast cancer research.

IMO the reason “diversity” was not a word we used often over 20 years ago is that we said then that we were a “melting pot”. We encouraged a sort of coming together of cultures.

Now, I suppose, we encourage a “smorgasboard” as if in the past our melting pot didn’t respect the different flavors in there. We always had a thriving immigrant cultural stew here, we have little Italy, little China Town and even Irish restaurants like “McDonalds”.

I see Arab restaurants everywhere these days. I don’t think there is a divesity program for Kebab and Tika, but we have one for queer studies activists.

IMO immigrants aren’t the problem. It’s our own families that have turned against each other.

This kid and the people he killed are more a victim of his parents divorce and lack of adequate supervision of a psychotic young man than of immigration hate groups.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 6
namae nanka July 28, 2011 at 06:48

“Anders Breivik used anger against women to cast himself as a crusader, believing feminism is destroying the West from the inside and creating space for Islamism, says Michelle Goldberg.”


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 6
SingleDad July 28, 2011 at 07:22

I haven’t read into this story but after reading Peters post, maybe he wasn’t insane.

In that case I denounce his behavior and will say, IMO, such behavior has no place in the MRM.

Also, if he is not insane then the situation is much worse than I thought and there is even more need for the Powers That Be ™ to listen to what we are crying out every day here at the Spear-Head.

Remember: Thomas Ball’s immolation, he gave his life for your children.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 5
keyster July 28, 2011 at 08:19

Multi-culturalism is a liberal fantasy that defies our tribal instincts. Otherwise liberals wouldn’t be so xenaphobic themselves. They’d live in East LA, southside Chicago and Harlem. People LIKE being with their own kind. Even liberal elites like being with other liberal elites.

Promoting “tolerance of diversity” seems so kind and righteous at first, as long as your the majority ethnic group. Let’s see how hispanics behave towards whites once they dominate the USA. Let’s see how Muslims behave towards white Europeans once they dominate Europe.

Do you think they’ll insitute affirmative action for the “new minority”? Do you think they’ll allow a “white pride day”? Do you think they’ll be “diversity sensitive” towards the minority white population?

Becoming the white minority and expecting Muslims to embrace the same liberal ideals of multi-culturalism was Anders Breivik’s concern. The liberal elites preach and espouse these idelas from their lofty perches in the Hampton’s or Harvard square, not from our decrepit, crime ridden inner cities. Living amongst and accepting other races and their cultures is for the lowly, ill-informed white masses; in other words, something the rest of us should do.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 4
Nico July 28, 2011 at 08:48

OT: “Nearly 80 percent of men said they feel cheated by the divorce courts. But more women feel the sexes receive equal treatment than those who agree the men get a raw deal.”


When a majority of women – who are so prone to picture themselves as victims – estimate they receive a fair deal, you can be sure the system is biased in their favor.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
Charles Martel July 28, 2011 at 08:49

@Chevy Chase

Even if you gave these narcisstic fuckwads everything their screwed up brains desired, they’d still find some bullshit political/religious reason to murder people on a mass scale because that is how people like Breivik get their hard on. He is not a soldier. He is not a hero. He is a just a loony psycho murderer of children. God help the parents of those he killed.

I could not agree more. Breivik is a narcissistic psychopath. Consumed with his own self-importance and without a shred of human decency. The teenagers he killed may have been on the opposite side of the political spectrum, but they were human beings first, socialists second. It is pure evil to take someone’s life, someone’s one and only spark of consciousness on this planet, to compensate for your own personal inadequacies.

Breivik is also a coward. When the Norwegian police finally mustered the courage to show up, he meekly laid down his weapons like the gutless pussy that he is.

Now, though I do NOT condone their criminal actions, these guys had some balls.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 11
Leos Tomicek July 28, 2011 at 08:55

@ namae

I really love it how these hags are trying to spin Breivik’s personal situation in their favour. He was a woman hater? Why is what he wrote hateful towards women?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
SingleDad July 28, 2011 at 09:10

@ Leos

Because they’re all like that.

I love the way they try to through white males, their fathers, son’s, brothers and husbands, under the bus every chance they can.

@ Charles Martel

Yes he was a pussy. And his father thinks so too.

Remember: Thomas Ball’s immolation, he gave his life for your children.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3
Omnipitron July 28, 2011 at 09:32

“Why is it a “problem” for white people to like being with other white people but a good and wonderful thing for other ethnic groups to feel the same about themselves?”

Because whites are perceived to be ‘in power’, minorities are viewed as less powerful and therefore need all the support they can get. Listen, and I say this as a black man, the one thing we all need to realize is that the very same power dynamic which women abuse in regards to men, other races use against whites. Only women can be victims, never men, and therefore only minorities can be victims, never whites.

It isn’t true, don’t you believe that sh!t for a second. Ya’ll really need to lose the white guilt while your at it. Yeah slavery was sh!t and yeah, I have a Scottish surname which undoubtedly was given to an ancestor of mine who was purchased, but I personally wasn’t a slave and neither was any black person alive today. You didn’t enslave anyone personally so don’t own the crap of the past, period.

Moreover, you all best understand that because you as a white man are perceived to be in control, the ‘Powers that Be’ are actively doing their best to sh!t on everything you do.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 1
Firepower July 28, 2011 at 10:25

It was held at the Nordic Heritage museum in Ballard, which is Seattle’s Scandinavian neighborhood.

Seattle is the most pussified hanky wringing leftist cryfest next to Berkeley.

Sorry, but “your” neighbors wait with bated breath on the next traffic accident so they can lay wreaths next to telephone poles and feel ‘good’ about their deeds.

Omaha beach survivors get less press.
Fuck the dead.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 8
Leif July 28, 2011 at 10:46

OT, but has anyone else noticed Roissy’s blog has been deleted?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
gender foreigner July 28, 2011 at 11:00

Anders Breivik’s violence in Norway could very well have been an extraverted version of Tom Ball’s self immolation. It very well could be the case that in contrast to TB, AB decided to get something for something.

That is to say, the extavertization of the outgroups has probably begun. Now we’re in the second stage of violence.

The UK and Imperial Germany actually integrated out groups (especially the upwardly mobile ones–and upward mobility was allowed and encouraged variously in those two countries during the 1800s, especially). (And downward mobility was also allowed/encouraged variously for failing classes.)

In contrast, France did not allow for upward mobility nor downward mobility. As such, as Lord (I forgot his name–high judge in the UK) pointed out, (paraphrase), “If you don’t allow for correction within the system, you get correction against the system.”

Feminists and their cohorts of criminal allies make no means of correction within the system(s), and, as such, correction is beginning, finally, to be exercised against the system(s).

Such correction is not something I condone, but I condemn those Female Supremacists, Anti-white Supremacists, etc. who are responsible for the creation and ever worsening enhancement of their reichs.

Social Criminals (especially Gender Criminals, aka Feminists), the message is clear: end your crimes or else: do or die.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Firepower July 28, 2011 at 11:01

probably a lolzhack from the feminist mangina manga nerds.

Or, maybe His Majersty burned his ships to finally write That Book.

If so, all we’re left with is the
“look at THIS. Now THIS sucks worse than the last outrage!!”
and the
“yeah! right!!” kiddie crowd.


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 3
greyghost July 28, 2011 at 11:08


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
freebird July 28, 2011 at 11:33

Govt agent Provocateur.

Now we must root out those terrorist
MALES that think like he did.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
zimmy July 28, 2011 at 11:37

Something smells fishy in Norway. The nutcase Breivik’s murderous actions, supposedly political, don’t make sense. His arraignment, as carried out, is also suspect.

Can he possibly be some kind of “Manchurian Candidate”?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 4
Rebel July 28, 2011 at 12:02

There is much resentment here. It is self-destructing.

Any gesture of peace is met with scorn.

Are we off on a tangent?

There are pressing issues unresolved.

What will happen after Aug.2d?

I have cut down my expenses to a bare minimum. Any penny that leaves my pocket has to show a passport. No more crap enters my home.

I disqualify as a consumer.

Whatever happens to the economy and to society will affect me only slightly.

Are you ready for the big one? It’s on its way you know.

The clock is ticking…

May I suggest you throw away your mantle of resentment and look after yoursleves first and foremost?

Soon we will be in survival mode. Don’t you feel it too?

@Gender foreigner: Luckily, Pierre Trudeau was buried in Montreal: we don’t have to travel far to take a crap on his tombstone. I understand your frustration at being denied this great joy.
But there’s always a line up…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 28, 2011 at 12:10

For all you americans. This is what you are well advised to be learning about.


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 28, 2011 at 13:13

Charles Martel July 28, 2011 at 08:49
“It is pure evil to take someone’s life, someone’s one and only spark of consciousness on this planet, to compensate for your own personal inadequacies.”

Then I recommend you take this up with all the women who wield the criminal family courts to destroy mens lives in an act which is nothing more and nothing less than murder by proxy.

The numbers are in. TENS OF THOUSANDS of men kill themselves each year based on the crimes of women and the criminal family court. What happened in norway HAPPENS EVERY WEEK in Australia. But no-one cares about these men because they commit the final act themselves. No-one cares they were criminally abused and then HATED ON for asking for a path to justice.




If people do not like me taking that position to highlight the HATRED of men and the total lack of concern for MEN? So what?

I am not here to be liked. I am here to transform the willingness of men to stand up for THEMSELVES instead of acting like a bunch of children. The tag of “whiners” is not too far off if a man is not willing to put his muscle where his mouth is and defend his rights with force should it be necessary.

So Charles? Take your “pure evil” quote to the women and the criminals in the family courts. They are FAR MORE EVIL than this guy because THOSE EVIL PEOPLE pretend to be “good” the entire time they are committing their crimes that directly result in so many deaths.

I am sick to death of gutless men who do nothing useful criticising men when who they are WELL ADVISED to direct their criticism to is criminal women and criminals in the family court system.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 8
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 28, 2011 at 13:32

OT….but not far….

Jon Voight telling you what is going on.


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
Rebel July 28, 2011 at 14:57


But have you see this one?


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Rebel July 28, 2011 at 14:58


But have you seen this one?


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Rebel July 28, 2011 at 14:58

Sorry for the double post.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Masculist Man July 28, 2011 at 22:32

I could not agree more. Breivik is a narcissistic psychopath. Consumed with his own self-importance and without a shred of human decency. The teenagers he killed may have been on the opposite side of the political spectrum, but they were human beings first, socialists second

Breivik knew his enemy. Do you? The people you’re defending have no decency and they will use whatever means to accomplish their goals and if that means destroying your children then that is what they’ll do. They won’t be doing the soul-seaching crap you’re doing,you can trust me on that. We’re at war and if that is too uncomfortable for you then you came to the wrong site.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
john thames July 28, 2011 at 23:14

Breivik is a thoroughly confused man. He opposes Moslem immigration to Europe, justifiably so in my opinion, but then rhapsodizes about the state of Israel! He seems not to have noticed that the Jews are the people who let the Moslems in.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
Maaldweb July 29, 2011 at 02:37

A self-made millionaire sacrificed his life for his ideas and people call him a coward. In fact the people who call him a coward are usually keyboard warriors…

Breivik could have been in a yacht full of 19 year old females enjoying life and saying a big “fuck you” to the world and his country Norway. As many hedonists insist we should do. Instead he did what he thought it was best for the West and his country.
He abandoned a life of luxury and success to live in infamy and universal hate.
I doubt any of his critics have 1/5 of his testicular fortitude and determination.

Some may call him crazy but his manifesto makes sense and gives the impression that Breivik had a good understanding of the powers that are against the West. To call him a sociopath it does make sense, but then you have to extend that characterisation to the pilots who bomb villages and enjoy the explosions afterwards or the sailors who record the launching of surface to surface missiles and cheering.

BTW please stop the cries for the “innocent little children”. First of all, they were between the age of 15 and 25. Secondly and more importantly, they were the offspring of the elite on Norway destined to rule the country one day and complete its islamisation.
Also, at least 1/3 of them weren’t even native Norwegians, but “new Norwegians” of african and asian origin…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1
Maaldweb July 29, 2011 at 02:40

@John Thames

his alleged pro-zionism and anti-racism appear to be tactical. In his manifesto he expresses his agony for the eradication of the nordic genes and anyone with such good understanding of cultural marxism cannot be unaware of who masterminded it (i.e. the liberal jews of the Frankfurt School).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 2
Anonymous July 29, 2011 at 03:55

Given global warming and ozone depletion, one could argue that the future of humanity is a species of people with dark skin, particularly given the ruling class agenda of mass impoverishment. You have to have some money to afford A/C. If race mixing don’t accomplish the coloring of humanity, natural selection will. When you can’t hide in artificial cold, being a blond hair blue eye paleface in a hot high UV world is an epic fail of an adaptation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 7
maaldweb July 29, 2011 at 06:20


I have read several of your comments here and I have wanted to ask you a question for quite some time now. Are you paid to write such imbecilic and ludicrous comments or do you troll us for free?
By the way, this isn’t a rhetorical question.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 3
john thames July 29, 2011 at 08:59


He is in fact seriously confused.

Breiwert understands Cultural Marxism – but that is only one-half of the Jewish agenda. The other half is to make the world worship the state of Israel – where Jews practice the exact opposite of the principles they preach to the rest of the world. People who wish to poison their enemies with alien immigrant invasions do not want the same poison for themselves in their real country. That is the point that Breiwart – and you – are missing.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 3
Quartermain July 29, 2011 at 09:32

The cultural marxists are going to use Anders Breivik’s rampage to try to discredit nationalist movements and attempt to create sympathy for themselves.

I kind of agree with Alex Jones that it was a psy-op for the reasons stated above. Nationalists were gaining ground and the socialists were losing it.

As for the attempts at shaming by cultural marxists and trying to get nationalists on the defensive should be ignored and blown off. Another rampage or two will happen and people will forget who Anders Breivik is.

The cultural marxists are not content just to undermine and corrode White culture but other cultures as well. The black anger/white guilt dichotomy was a two pronged attack on both groups in a psychological warfare sort of way.

As I said before the man made illegal alien disaster has hurt Whites, Blacks, American Indians, and Chicanos as well.

People are waking up anyway, and the AIC (assholes in charge) are not too happy about it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
Maaldweb July 29, 2011 at 12:57

@John Thames

I am not sure about the “israel-worship” thing to be honest.

Liberal Jews and Zionist Jews may tolerate each other and equally hate the white male but are far from the identical
The first despise the latter because zionists have adopted many aspects of European nationalism.

As for Breivik perhaps he is confused, but if you read certain parts of his manifesto carefully you get the impression that he avoided the jewish angle of the problem in order to protect his movement from being called antisemitic.


I wouldn’t trust Alex Jones much, anyone who is afraid to identify the banking elite as jewish is either an idiot or dishonest.
Not to mention that for him everything is a psy-op and a false flag op. It is understandable however since he is a salesman and what he sales is conspiracy theories. Some of them might be true, others are totally fictitious.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
john thames July 29, 2011 at 14:41


I would be careful in describing the Zionist movement as imitative of European nationalism. The original idea behind the Zionist movement was that Jews should segregate themselves from European civilization because Jews and non-Jews were inherently incompatible. The British Empire thought that giving Jews a “national home” in Arab Palestine would wean Jews away from Communist revolution. Now Zionists claim that Israeli values and western values are one and the same. No shit.

Breivik was getting his ideas from some very blatantly Zionist web sites where these facts were never mentioned (for obvious reasons).In short, the murdering Norwegian homo was and is thoroughly confused. Feminists screaming about “sex discrimination” while ignoring all the discrimination in favor of women are equally fucked up.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4
Maaldweb July 29, 2011 at 22:51

@John Thames

Theodor Herzl the father of Zionism lived in the age of the rise of European nationalism, so he was influenced by the latter. Of course Zionism is distinct from European nationalism in many ways, but the will for the creation of a homogenous nation-state is the same.

I am not arguing in any way for an alliance with the zionists of israel since they would again exploit us and throw us to the wolves as soon as we are of no use to them.
During the Apartheid in South Africa, the Israelis were telling the South Africans that they had common interests because they were both western nations besieged by thirdworlders (blacks and arabs respectively). As soon as Apartheid dismantled (and jewish businessmen and jewish marxists played a heavy role in it) they gave the ANC all the information they had on European resistance groups in SA…

MacDonald is the only individual in the altright-sphere who has studied the Breivik phenomenon from a political perspective and without the usual “omg he killed children!” screams. The man and his work are simply indispensable

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
john thames July 30, 2011 at 09:23


You are quite correct. I would also point out that during the demands for embargo on South Africa, the U.S. Congress always made a special exemption for the diamond trade so that Oppenheimer controlled DeBeers could continue exporting raw diamonds to the Jewish Diamond Exchange in Israel. We both know how it really works.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Quartermain July 30, 2011 at 09:53


I’m not a Alex Jones fanatic, but I do believe that there are things happening behind the scene.


There’s some weird shit going on.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
cecilhenry July 30, 2011 at 18:38

Here is a portion of a letter I sent to federal Politicians regarding the Norway Tragedy: ……

But there are large numbers of people in the West who believe that the multiculturalists, the people who are FORCING changes in Western culture, in Western religion, in Western civilization (and ethnicity), are really the enemy.

Michael Scheuer, former CIA intelligence officer
When I suggested to him that the police are functioning as “enforcers for an experiment in social engineering” he responded that “Diversity is a good thing”. He also said that Whites will be a minority in Calgary by 2020.
Interview with Calgary Police officer (Jeff Goodall)

The recent tragedy in Norway highlights a larger issue that the Canada (America, and West in General) ignores at its peril.

As Michael Scheuer rightly points out:
July 29, 2011.

“What it does say is…. that Multiculturalism has failed in western Europe and The United States and in Canada and elsewhere.

But there are large numbers of people in the West who believe that the multiculturalists, the people who are FORCING changes in Western culture, in Western religion, in Western civilization (and ethnicity), are really the enemy. And that’s certainly what the man in Norway felt. And I don’t think he’s alone.

Again he’s probably in a very small minority who will pick up a gun and do something.

But the government’s who have allowed endless amounts of open immigration, who have made free speech much less viable in the West. They’re at base the cause of what happened in Norway. It was an over-reaction to a FAILED policy. At least according to Cameron and Merkel.”

The Conservative governements’ recent intrdouction of Bill C-51 (in Canada) with provisions to censor the internet, criminalize ‘hate’ speech linking objectionable content, and the incident of the Calgary police taking sides in an issue of freedom of speech and thought in order to control the debate are but two examples of an unacceptable and long standing pattern of abuse. It is very disturbing and unacceptable to see the police forces taking political positions on government policy and free speech issues.

Do you understand why people are opposed to the destruction and ethnic dispossesion of their society?

This is genocide– tacit or otherwise. And it is undemocratic. It is, of course, also immoral.

And it will engender conflict.

Under international law, genocide is not confined to murder or physical violence and White genocide is not always explicit or related to immigration policy. Evidence of moral degradation, ethnic cleansing from neighborhoods, policies to suppress White birthrates, interracial violence, vilification of the White race, and other such attacks contributing to White genocide is encouraged as well.

That is racism and it is wrong.

These are NOT the concerns of crackpots, racists or whatever other pejoratives one may choose to use but legitimate concerns. But ignoring and deliberately flouting the demographic and ethnic interests of whites everywhere will leave only crackpots to draw the attention.

White ethnic groups have the basic right to control their nation, protect their ethnic interests and control borders to maintain the identity of their society:

The overarching goal of the “open borders” movement is to flood millions of non-Whites into all traditionally White nations. Make no mistake – this is not mere coincidence. It is White genocide by design, worldwide in application. The United States, Great Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Australia: White people founded and populated these nations. All of these nations operated under the implicit mandate, if not explicit by law, that they existed as White nations for the posterity of the White founding stock. All of these nations had overwhelmingly White populations for the preponderance of their national history. Now, in the beginning of the twenty-first century, all of these traditionally White nations face demographic upheavals through massive non-White immigration. The White populations of these countries are slated to become minority populations in just a few generations.

International law defines genocide as an international crime against humanity.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
john thames July 30, 2011 at 18:46


Here! Here!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
gender foreigner July 30, 2011 at 21:58

Dear Maaldweb July 29, 2011 at 22:51:

Great points. I admire your grasp of issues.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
gender foreigner July 30, 2011 at 21:59

Dear john thames July 30, 2011 at 09:23:

Great points. I admire your grasp of issues.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel July 31, 2011 at 14:56

@Masculist Man

Breivik knew his enemy. Do you? The people you’re defending have no decency and they will use whatever means to accomplish their goals and if that means destroying your children then that is what they’ll do. They won’t be doing the soul-seaching crap you’re doing,you can trust me on that. We’re at war and if that is too uncomfortable for you then you came to the wrong site.

What war is that? The war on teenagers? LOL.

Breivik is not just a narcissist, he’s a lying, self-aggrandizing narcissist. Facial plastic surgery at 21? Refusing to appear in public except in a red Lacoste sweater? This smug little grin tells the whole story. He’s just loving the attention.

The tales he tells in his manifesto are also being revealed as lies and fantasy. The street dancing, the tagging, the money made and lost in the stock market, boyhood friendships and experiences, all exaggeration at best, lies at worst. The guy was living with his mother at age 30 because he was too broke to rent an apartment.

Breivik is such a chump I think there’s a reasonable chance this was a psy-op. He’s the perfect patsy. Narcissistic, egotistical, believes in his own superiority. At the mysterious 2003 London meeting someone planted the idea they were the new Knights Templar. That is the PERFECT way for an intelligence operative to reel in a chump like Breivik. Make him believe he’s special. Let him play dress-up in a cool new costume. Just look at the dumb fuck in his make-believe uniform.

Breivik purchased a 14 year supply of Ammonium Nitrate for his rented five acre farm. Think about that. How come that didn’t ring any alarm bells? I will also say that, having become acquainted with ANFO bombs myself in Northern Ireland, I was surprised at how effective his home-brew bomb was. The problem with ANFO is that it’s hard to detonate. You need a smaller device made from military or commercial explosive to generate a sufficiently rapid rise in pressure to set it off. Otherwise all you get is a small explosion and a large shower of unexploded oily Ammonium Nitrate crystals. Where did he get this military/commercial explosive? What has the MSM said about that? Hint – nothing.

Breivik looks like a patsy to me. Even if he is actually a lucky amateur, his crimes are a gift to those who wish to curtail our freedoms and break down our culture.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
Charles Martel July 31, 2011 at 14:58

Smug little grin.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
beta_plus August 6, 2011 at 11:03

The sexual nature of the Norwegian shooter’s attack cannot be ignored. He intentionally targeted the sexual results of his rivals – their children. The bombing of the Prime Minister’s office looks like it was meant to be a diversion tactic.

It was hard for me not to notice when reading about him on Wikipedia that he was around 6 feet tall. For Norway, that is short for a man. As short men, even with top notch game, have a inherently harder time getting women in a society that has taken state-institutionalized female hypergamy fueled by petro-dollars and an effective tax rate of 70% of one’s income to its ultimate conclusion, I very much suspect the shooter had very difficult access to sexual partners and those partners would almost certainly have been obese (Scandinavian women are not as thin as they were 30 years ago and have obesity rates about the same as one would see in Toronto). Given the enormous tax burden he had to pay plus a sky high cost of living driven by petro-dollars and incredible government regulation of the free market, using his ability to work to generate wealth to make up for this would have been out of the question. Most men in the position will quietly resign to their fate – but a few outliers will snap and lash out violently.

While he made have used far right nationalism as his rationalization, it’s pretty obvious he attacked those who had stripped him of the assets necessary for him to have his own kids. He took back what they had taken from him, with massive penalties and interest.

The above is NOT a justification for his actions – it is to show that his actions were not mysterious and were frankly predictable. As a half-Dane, I had been wondering for years when something like this would happen. He needs to be severely punished for what he did. If Norway wishes to continue as a civilization they will need to revisit the concepts of life imprisonment, the death penalty, providing proper security for its democratically elected officials (the endlessly annoying hard-working-security-obsessed-beta-male-provider behavior of the American Secret Service has been vindicated by this incident) and providing proper equipment for their SWAT teams (left-wing feminists love “training” special police forces because that’s “education”, but boy do they get angry when they realize to actually use that education they need expensive “evil” thing like noise suppressed Blackhawk helicopters). However, his motivation is obvious to those who are willing to confront the uncomfortable truths of human sexuality and its relationship human civilization.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: