Mirth in the Mutilation of Men

by careyroberts on July 26, 2011

No one disputes the facts of the case. After a brief marriage, a 60-year-old California business owner filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences. He allowed his wife, Catherine Becker, to remain in his condominium while the divorce was finalized.

But Becker apparently became consumed by a jealous rage over the man’s new-found romantic interest. So last Monday she drugged the man, lashed him to a bed, severed his penis with a 10-inch knife, and tossed the appendage into a garbage disposal.

Most were appalled and outraged. “It’s hard to believe what would motivate a person to do this sort of thing,” said Susan Kang Schroeder, chief of the Orange County District Attorney’s Office. “It’s one of the worst things you could do to a person short of killing him.”

Ali Ammar, who handles hundreds of divorce and domestic disputes a year with Orange Detective Agency in Irvine, commented, “I’ve seen people with their heads blown off, but this story makes me cringe,” Not surprisingly, Judge Debra Carrillo ordered Becker held without bail.

But for some, the incident was cause for merriment and glee.

Veronica Roberts of California made light of the incident, headlining how Becker made “mince meat” of her victim’s appendage. “Another women performed a ‘Bobbit’ and goes for the cleaver,” she wrote cheerfully.

Leigh Moody, anchor at KSPR-TV in Springfield, Missouri, prefaced her blog entry with the words, “Revenge Attack.” Apparently Ms. Moody was not troubled by the notion of vigilante justice implicit in her headline.

At SodaHead News, the attack was cause for ribald hilarity. “What’s up with all these severed penises? It’s like the new go-to punishment for unruly husbands.”

The blogger at Hegemony Heights was inspired to pen this light-hearted limerick:

There once was a woman called Becker
who cut off her poor husband’s pecker
On her way to divorce
she used drugs and some force
to become the ultimate home wrecker

But some dispensed with the façade of facetiousness.

At The Stir, Maijken Brence wrote, “some men deserve things like this happening to them.” And over at the Online Dish, Kim commented, “the jaw dropper is the garbage disposal part…hahaha.”

And the inevitable Facebook page offering approving “You go girl!” call-outs for Becker: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Catherine-Kieu-Becker-Fan-page/111461202282860

When Wendy Williams was asked about the incident, the TV personality quipped,
“When you cross a woman, all is fair.” Finding humor in the garbage disposal, Williams joked, “It was more efficient than throwing it in a field, where they could pick it up.”

Over at ABC’s The Talk, Sharon Osbourne decided it was time to goose her audience ratings. So after averring she didn’t know the circumstances for his decision to file for the divorce (did the reasons really matter?), she described the incident as “hysterical” and summed it up with the remark, “it’s quite fabulous.”

A couple days later Osbourne issued an apology, stating, “I do not condone genital mutilation and I didn’t mean any harm by laughing about it and I’m sorry that I offended people ‘cause that’s not my intention or the intention of the show – it’s not what we are about.”

But that apology misses the mark. The issue is not whether Osbourne intended to offend her viewers or whether people were in fact offended. The point is, Osbourne indulged in grossly inappropriate behavior in a way that minimized the grotesque incident and ridicule men.

Let’s call it woman’s inhumanity to man.

{ 63 comments… read them below or add one }

john thames July 26, 2011 at 11:11

Why don’t men start sticking bayonets in vaginas and rationalizing it as “How to fuck a feminist”?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 187 Thumb down 21
Ken July 26, 2011 at 11:15

Not surprising…..look for more of this sort of thing not getting the mutilator any real jail time~ more and more instances of women unfairly and illegally attacking men and getting off light or scot-free. Like I said before, it could soon become acceptable for any female to use force on men(“public safety”) just for speaking to them in public, walking to close and “creeping her out” etc. etc. If you’re not “Captain Awesome” then you get the tasered!
Don’t think it’s possible? Let us just wait and see…. :(

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 128 Thumb down 2
Uncredited Source July 26, 2011 at 11:37

If you watch the “apology” video, Sharon Osbourne was snickering under her breath as she spoke. She whined on her Facebook page that SHE was a victim of people giving her a hard time. That’s women for you.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 145 Thumb down 5
Opus July 26, 2011 at 11:38

Interesting to compare these women’s mirthful reactions to the general horror over the Norwegian killings. Clearly some forms of violence are not merely justifiable but downright hilaaaaaaaaaarious.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 77 Thumb down 1
Anti Idiocy July 26, 2011 at 12:09

Said it before, and I’ll say it again. The guy probably wanted a divorce because Becker was extremely violent and dangerous.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 134 Thumb down 2
Rebel July 26, 2011 at 12:55

“Let’s call it woman’s inhumanity to man.”

This phrase sums it up very precisely.
It is one very accurate description.

Have you noticed that even as men become more and more subservient to women, women’s hate is still on the rise?

We can sue them and get them to shut up but it won’t affect their feelings.

I am puzzled and deeply disturbed by the way things are going.

It is very hard to get a good understanding. I have found an explanation in this text from David Quinn;


I suggest reading this, specifically the few last pages regarding the future of men. He’s not alone in his thinking: I have read something much alike somewhere in a book called “Book three” (darn if I know where to find it now)

The “news” are not good but painful knowledge is preferable to the bliss of ignorance.

Warning: This book is not for the faint hearted. Quinn’s warning is true: this will shatter dreams for some here.

David Quinn is definitely a thinker. If he is right, things are gonna get “rock’n roll”. Prepare.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 48 Thumb down 0
SingleDad July 26, 2011 at 13:12

@ Anti Idocy

No, I think your wrong here.

I wish for the sake of men that this fellow did see her for the danger she was to him. If he had he would not have been mutilated.

He probably left her at great cost to himself to find trim that has not had the tap turned off by someone he just married.

But he was mutilated. What can explain mutual partner mutilation of a sane man, living in a large city in one of the most wealthy and “abuse” concious countries in the world?

The inhumanity of his ex is without question. The inhumanity of the female population to the suffering of men is part of the pill men have begrudgingly had to swallow.

IMO, what kept him there was addiction to the stank taco and loneliness.

This is what the ladies are cheering about. Women in the united states now have the right to castrate any p@ssybegger they please, no previous relationship is neccessary, see Wendy Williams.

If MGTOW will be a way out of this mess for men, companionship and sex will have to be met in a legal and safe manner.

Until then, our little lillies of the valley have us by the balls.

Remember: Thomas Ball’s immolation, he gave his life for your children.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 4
orry July 26, 2011 at 13:52

There’s something very important missing in this article.

ETOnline.com posted a video interview with Sharon Osbourne on or around June 22, 2011, a mere three weeks before the Catherine Becker incident. In this interview, Sharon was asked about Arnold Schwarzenegger cheating on his wife Maria. Sharon said “I would’ve lopped off his “bleep” and threw it into the disposal….going round and round (while making hand gestures). At which point both Sharon and the interviewer started laughing hysterically.

If Catherine Becker got the idea from that video, or any related articles on the web from said video, should Sharon Osbourne be arrested for conspiracy to aggravated mayhem?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 110 Thumb down 1
joe July 26, 2011 at 13:59

It’s time to bring an end to Sharon Osborne’s career. She’s on video record a month before the Kieu – Becker mutilation saying that she would have cut off Arnie’s penis and put it in the garbage disposal. She laughed as she said this. And then celebrated it when Kieu actually did it.

If you are a man, anywhere, and you have ANY opporutunity to obstruct / withdraw help or service from Sharon Osborn in any way, you should do so!

Let’s put the Fight Club solution into practice, as we are the people who drive, guard, fetch and carry etc. for these parasitic “celebs”.

If you celebrate the suffering of men, don’t expect ANY man to:
- carry your bags
- drive you in a taxi or limo
- film you on camera
- fix your electric / plumbing / gas
- do your accounts
- give you directions
- bodyguard you
- build / renovate your home

If men EVERYWHERE withdraw their service from Sharon Osborn her life will go down the shitter faster than you can say “Should’ve kept your hateful mouth shut.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 100 Thumb down 1
MSFM July 26, 2011 at 14:29

There has been a lot of discussion and reference to evo. psych. as an means to gain insight into the dynamics of the male / female sexual dance.
While this may be grossly oversimplified here is my take on how this is playing out:

Women are the weaker sex physically and as a consequence have learned to hone their manipulative skills to a fine art. They are driven by emotion, not reason.
Under feminism hypergamy has been allowed to flourish and those restraints placed on barbaric female behavior are being removed under the guise of “empowerment.”
The female primal, instinctive drive to mate with the most dominant male is playing out on a massive scale.
As a consequence women are expressing increasingly aggressive behaviors towards any and all men they deem (on an unconscious, reptilian brain level) as unworthy mates.
In effect they are attempting to eliminate those males (directly through physical violence or indirectly by means of the social / legal system) who are less than the primal ideal, leaving them to run wild for selection by what would be the optimum female mating strategy: a world comprised of nothing but dominant alpha males.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 54 Thumb down 1
keyster July 26, 2011 at 14:37

Penis envy in Freudian psychoanalysis refers to the theorized reaction of a girl during her psychosexual development to the realization that she does not have a penis.

Freud considered this realization a defining moment in the development of gender and sexual identity for women.

Feminists have been highly critical of penis envy as a concept and psychoanalysis as a discipline, arguing that the assumptions and approaches of the psychoanalytic project are profoundly patriarchal, anti-feminist, and misogynistic and represent women as broken or deficient men. We happen to know Freud was simply being honest based on his extensive research.

Karen Horney—a German psychoanalyst who also placed great emphasis on childhood experiences in psychological development—was a particular advocate of this view. She asserted the concept of “womb envy” as an emotional reaction to the idea of penis envy.

To put it another way feminists dismissed the concept of penis envy as, “penis envy” envy. Or, if little girls want a penis, it only makes sense that little boys would want a womb.

Laughing at a man who had his penis cut off gives women a sense of power over men, because they know how umcomfortable it makes men…
…and they know they can get away with it without being hit.

A man punished his wife by raping her with a long barbed, red hot iron.
Ha, ha, ha.
Isn’t that funny…

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 67 Thumb down 2
Jean Valjean July 26, 2011 at 14:41

Yes Sharon Osborne gave an apology of sorts. The first time she tried she burst out laughing and couldn’t get the words out. Then Leah Rimini, the actress, got all serious and sincere and said a few words to give Osbourne a chance to compose herself. You could see them all biting their lips trying not to laugh and finally Osbourne belted out her apology which by this time no one could believe was sincere.

What is the upshot of this? Well the next time some bitch starts spouting off about domestic violence I’m going to point to this case and tell her that not only do women commit domestic violence but women overwhelmingly approve of domestic violence and think it’s “fabulous” so why the fuck should I care if you got your face punched in by your last 5 boyfriends? You picked them and besides I think it’s hilarious!!!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 103 Thumb down 1
Turbo the Drycleaner July 26, 2011 at 14:42

and these are the same people who are annoyed by potential racism in a vag washing commercial.

Questionable priorities, no doubt.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 0
MSFM July 26, 2011 at 15:26

Regarding Keyster’s comment on penis envy.

True, it is an expression of power.
Women want power over lesser males to prevent them from mating.
A man who has been traumatically emasculated cannot mate with his attacker, or any other woman. This act of barbarism and the subsequent celebration is flaunting the power females have been granted over all males deemed unworthy to mate.

Killing him would not carry the same message.
“We don’t want him dead, just out of commission sexually.”

Men who can be controlled and overpowered by women are effectively eliminated from the gene pool leaving the hyper-aggressive males.
Males that cannot be controlled by women are the ones they (woman) are sexually attracted to for this reason.
Women need subservient, weak (relatively speaking) males to work and provide for them, but they are not desired as mating prospects on a primal level.

Not pretty to accept but the evidence is there in broad daylight.
The social engineers are beckoning the animals to run wild in our zoo culture.

Who put this show on the air?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 49 Thumb down 1
XS July 26, 2011 at 15:31


“Have you noticed that even as men become more and more subservient to women, women’s hate is still on the rise?

We can sue them and get them to shut up but it won’t affect their feelings.

I am puzzled and deeply disturbed by the way things are going.”

Nothing really surprising here if you think about it. This is a WAR, the “battle of the sexes”, and on the battlefield the psychopaths always rise to the top. Studies after WW2 showed that only 5% of the soldiers done most of the killing, a further 15% got caught up in the action and also killed, while the remaining 80% never shot their rifles.

This was of course before the relentless propaganda/childhood indoctrination/sophisticated media techniques spanning decades.

You cannot reason with these ‘people’, it’s futile. They are so far beyond basic humanity that they’re beyond help. The only option is to expose them for the psychos they are so that other men will start to see reality.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 1
DogFace Soldier July 26, 2011 at 15:59

The statement by Wendy Williams shows just how untouchable women are in the Western World. I can’t wait to witness the backlash that occurs against women when the majority of men have taken off the kid gloves. I stopped giving pussy passes the day I took the red pill.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 69 Thumb down 1
IndyGuy77 July 26, 2011 at 16:01

I’ve thought before that if John Wayne Bobbit gutted Lorena in Times Square on live TV, I’d never vote “guilty” were I to serve on the jury.

Same for this foul creature.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 51 Thumb down 1
David K. Meller July 26, 2011 at 17:16

The anger and disgust motivating John Thames comment on 26 July 2011 at 11:11:

“Why don’t men start sticking bayonets in vaginas, and rationalizing it as ‘How to fuck a feminist”? is spot on!

At all costs, don’t engage in, or even encourage the atrocious physical ACTIONS–leave that to the subhuman feminists–but talking about it in the same humerous, offhand, and amusing terms, and when they, and their allies and supporters try to take us to task for our “warped” and “sadistic” humor, remind them of the feminist response to far worse atrocities committed against us men! It might even be interesting if “humerous” websites laughing at feminist complaints of so-called “domestic violence”, sexual ‘harassment’ and even “rape” were popularized on Men’s rights websites. As long as you didn’t clearly encourage, aid and abet such action, this long overdue ridicule and demeaning the “victimized(?) sluts by your blogs or websites would be covered by the first amendment, and watch the screams and howls from the Sharon Osbournes and Wendy Williams, et al then!

I am willing to bet that for every one such feminist atrocity that makes the news, there are quite a number that still remain unknown except in forgotten corners of the world wide web. A little hunting will go a long way, and then, turn it around and have fun, fellows!!

David K. Meller

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 4
Hayden Hanna July 26, 2011 at 17:57

Thank you for posting the link to Quinn’s work. I had not read anything by him before and found it fascinating.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
CyclotronMajesty July 26, 2011 at 18:10

Yep this is defiantly penis envy. This Osborne nuisance probably has a very unsatisfied sex life and is very upset at men about it. She therefore holds the position: If I can’t have it, neither can you.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 0
Firepower July 26, 2011 at 18:22

White men
are the 21st century’s

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 57 Thumb down 11
King Alfred July 26, 2011 at 18:40

Those who consider these unspeakable crimes against men to be a laughing matter will dance to a different tune when Sharia law is enforced in the West and the long-mocked Western man does nothing to stop its advance. Why should we bleed and die to “liberate” women, when they only wish to mutilate and mock us?

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 48 Thumb down 0
Timothy July 26, 2011 at 18:45

Women have a complete LACK of empathy for men’s suffering. Men have an OVER ABUNDANCE of empathy for womens’ suffering. Feminism would cease to exist without men’s endless compassion and understanding for those poor little victims.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 62 Thumb down 1
MSFM July 26, 2011 at 18:55

XS July 26, 2011 at 15:31
“Have you noticed that even as men become more and more subservient to women, women’s hate is still on the rise?”

Women are repulsed by overly compliant, subservient men in the same way men are repulsed by aggressive, hostile, physically unattractive women.

You might call it a vicious circle.

As noted, the state has usurped the authority of the male to set the tone.

The “tone” I refer to is not abuse or pathological control as some would claim, simply the natural order of things.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 0
Anonymous July 26, 2011 at 19:21

Sharon Osbourne and Wendy Williams are willing to say those hateful things because they know there will be no serious repercussions. They know that this issue will blow over and soon be forgotten. And it will, if we let it.

Despite the huge reaction this story has gotten in the manosphere, it got very little mainstream attention. So anyone who finds this story as disgusting as I do should post this story everywhere they can think. Blogs are good, but permanent messages boards (like Sharon’s message board on IMDB.com) are even better. Not only should we never forget what women like Sharon said, but we should never let her forget either.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 0
Avenger July 26, 2011 at 19:25

@Ken-Not surprising…..look for more of this sort of thing not getting the mutilator any real jail time~

Jail time? She should receive the death penalty. If I remember correctly there were 7 capital crimes and Mayhem was one of them. This old bag was charged with Mayhem along with other crimes. She needs to be executed.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 1
Virtual Gangsta July 26, 2011 at 19:52

The opposite of love is indifference. God help the women of the west once men become completely apathetic about them. THAT’S when the shit will hit the fan.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 51 Thumb down 2
john thames July 26, 2011 at 19:52

This woman should be executed by exactly the method I prescribed. She deserves it. I See that “poor” Maria Shriver wants spousal support from Arnold Schwarzenneger. She should not get a penny. This woman is perfectly capable of getting a job as a journalist. She would rather get a free ride off her ex-hubby. Spousal support was paid in the days before women earned their own money. Now women want the restriction lifted without giving up the benefit based on the restriction that no longer applies. How appropriate that this feminist supremacist cunt wants it both ways – all the while preaching against “sex discrimination”.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 42 Thumb down 0
john thames July 26, 2011 at 19:57

The purpose of my “stick it in their vagina” comment was to demonstrate that outrageous proposals are either acceptable or inacceptable depending on who is making them. If Arnold stuck the steel up Maria’s cunt hole that would never do.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 1
Hayden Hanna July 26, 2011 at 20:08

Sharon demonstrated the reality of female indifference to male suffering, which all men experience every day. Hillary Clinton seems to always provide examples to show that worthless cunts like Sharon are just expressing the deep hatred that most women feel toward men. I recollect her speech given in south america during which she stated that women are the real victims of war because they lose their husbands and sons. That is a prime example of gyncentric thinking, female loss of status and income trumps the male rotting in a grave. I will not forget Sharon’s or Hillary’s comments. The true nature of the female of our species is painful to accept.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 1
codebuster July 26, 2011 at 20:54

The female primal, instinctive drive to mate with the most dominant male is playing out on a massive scale.

I cringe every time I see references to this “dominant alpha male” myth. Every time I see this view expressed, I’m thinking that here is another dude advertising his difficulty in getting laid.

The idea that women choose dominant alphas does not accord with my own observations. I’ve seen women choose complete idiots, so far divergent from anything dominant and proud that one would have to assume that they are deliberately trying to force humanity to devolve backwards to the stone-age.

Here’s a tip. The more intriguing (dominant, alpha, whatever) that a man is, the greater is the likelihood that women will be intimidated by him, and the more important it is for him to properly apply Game, to disarm them and put them at ease.

Women are easily spooked, and the natural predispostion of many of them to seek out the company of knuckle-dragging imbeciles should never be misinterpreted as hypergamy. Monosyllabic knuckle-draggers are able to put women at ease because they do not expect much from women and they make few demands, and this disarms women, making them feel relaxed and comfortable. They meet the dual requirement of being macho whilst making a woman feel that she does not have to live up to higher expectations. In feeling more relaxed and at peace with the world, in the company of a buffoon, a woman will lower her guard. By contrast, the more interesting and attractive that a man is, the more a woman’s rationalization hamster is going to kick into over-drive to jeopardize her ideal, and the more important effective Game becomes to a man. Why is this? Because of the contrary logics that a man has to manage – to be both attractive (formidable, respectable), yet accessible (disarming, charming).

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 32 Thumb down 19
Auntie Pheminizm July 26, 2011 at 22:47

> “after WW2 showed that only 5% of the soldiers done most of the killing”

True. I read a book where the military author found that most men in the Civil War actually shot OVER the heads of the enemy. To wit: it takes a LOT to make humans kill. Yet we are told males “love” murder.

Plus we only expect half of humanity, males, to face the choice of killing for national “security.”

Same with creating civilizations. If constructing buildings cost lives (it always does), why are only males expected to pay the price. And then be shamed for being the Patriarchy?

The irony: men find it VERY hard to kill. Yet, by and large, we have under socialization (male-only drafts, etc.). At the same time, we’ve remained mute and immobile while women’s groups attacked us. For decades.

It’s time to summon both the intelligence and courage to admit we ARE in a gender WAR…and start fighting back.

Yet too many men still ignore, mock, and marginalize guys who take action…like dressing in comic hero garb to protest at Britain’s Parliament. Men’s groups who still do nothing say it’s “counter-productive.” Compared to what: their 40 years of inactivism?

It’s time to act like caring, EFFECTIVE male humans. Stand up! Don’t be meek. Meekness assures other men and boys get harmed.

So clang your balls, lest feminsts amputate them while laughing.

Things didn’t get the way the are because men acted. We’re in the shit-stew now because men’s groups chose to be “polite” instead of effective.

Most father’s rights groups act like manginas…auxiliaries of women’s groups. They are the enemy, too. Trust me.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 2
Anonymous July 26, 2011 at 22:55

One of the disadvantages of having an Asian born wife.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0
finndistan July 27, 2011 at 01:22

Osbourne and Williams (Assborn and Willingass) saying they’re sorry does not change anything.

The tens of women cheering in the studio is the real pointer of what women think.

The next time a woman rages and raves about rape, if I sense a double standard, I will pull up the topic of Bobbit and this cretin, and see her reaction.

If, the woman was raging and raving about rape, but smiles at male mutilation,

1. She is a male mutilation enabler and supporter,
2. She will be asked, “So rape is an atrocious act, but if the rapist would then cut of her clit, we would all laugh?”
3. She has deserved my inactivity in case of her needing any kind of help or support.

As I say in my other comments, the time of dealing gently and logically with these people is over, (it was over when the women were handing out white feathers to cowards, and then claiming men start wars, and demanded the right to vote)

I will not engage a logical-sensible discussion with a person who laughs at me getting dismembered.

You laugh at mael mutilation, you are not “this is not funny”, you are ” A male mutilation supporter, enabler and apologist”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 2
Luke July 27, 2011 at 04:12

It occurs to me that all white men should close their wallets and refuse to donate a dime to any of these endless do-gooder organizations that solicit contributions to fight ‘breast cancer’.

Or, to any other organization or charity that goes for ‘womens’ issues.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 38 Thumb down 3
MWPeak July 27, 2011 at 04:30

I wonder who beheaded more people: Kings or Queens?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
NWOslave July 27, 2011 at 05:10

All five host’s joined in the revelry. The one who actually made a comparison made sure to first apologize for being a, “buzzkill.” She readily joined back in for the rest of the misandry party. Shouldn’t the audience share the blame as well? There were no cries of outrage or protest at this heinous act. That was a very diverse representation of every race and political affiliation of american women. And they all joined in the festivities.

Can you imagine a MSM show where five men laughed at a woman being drugged and having her vagina mutilated with an audience of men rolling around in joyous laughter? No you can’t because it would never happen.

As long as the insatiable lust to hate men is desired and welcomed by society every show and product depicting the hatred of men will be readily available. Supply and demand; As long as this lust for misandry permeates society every State, Corporate, Charity and MSM outlet will compete to fill that need.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 0
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 05:44

Western women disgust me. The comments Cary has collected are just more evidence of the man-hatred I see every day.

This topic came up on the weekend when I was talking to some EEW. They immediately and roundly denounced this crime for the crime it was.

One of them even went so far to say “I would want any man who did similar to me dead.”

Every EEW woman I talked to about this immediately related to the incident as “What if that was me? Would I like to be treated like that?”

EEW run things through the filter “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”.

They do not condone anything that they would not tolerate happening to themselves. It is a very simple test. And it is one WW refuse to make.

Like I said. WW disgust me now. Not least of which is because they LAUGH are a blatant crime like this.


Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 36 Thumb down 4
DirkJohanson July 27, 2011 at 06:17

Just remember this next time women complain about domestic violence. In fact, many of them love domestic violence, as long as guys are the victim.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 1
universe July 27, 2011 at 08:48

Crikey, courtesy of the investigative diggings of Carey Roberts, the number of female mainstream and other media talking heads delighting over a man’s severed penis by his soon-to-be ex-wife is revealing itself more and worse than previously imagined.
Being away days from a computer and TSH, where learning of these combined incidents, the regional radio media I was forced to tune into mentioned very little if anything about the raw planned surgery upon Mr. Becker.

From the Jerks @ SodaHead ‘news’ on down the line to certain media executives allowing their news editors at giving their talking head underlings free reign to impart this intended harm story humourously without remorse, this incident is not done with yet. Mere insincere apology alone to cover over the baleful reporting of this evil act perpetrated upon Mr. Becker will not be enough.

If anything good could come about from these incidents may be that the happy expositors of this incident become recognized for what they are. And that the production crews and talking heads vengefully reporting this incident receive the guillotine of corporate dismissal.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) July 27, 2011 at 09:55

My facebook email has now had 400+ views…pretty good…others can also send her the same message….apology NOT accepted.


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Attila July 27, 2011 at 16:57

It’s all one-way with women – even when it doesn’t appear to be – that much should be clear to any thinking man. Sympathy/attention/compassion addicts all the way!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Joseph Dantes July 27, 2011 at 17:11

Meanwhile clitorectomies get hagiographic films starring Halle Barry.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2
David K. Meller July 27, 2011 at 18:02

Many forms of cancer have psychosomatic aspects to their development and metastasis. It is certainly possible that the breast cancers (not to mention ovarian and vaginal cancers) have a psychosomatic aspect to their development, their metastasis (if any) and prospects of cure. The feelings of vicious sadism, brutality, and callous indifference to another’s pain in such harpies must inexorably work on the molecular, genetic, and cellular level to generate consequences! I hope that you girls find these consequences as hilarious as I do when you annoy me with your next women’s health campaign against cancer!

Maybe women don’t strictly speaking, DESERVE cancer, but it will be hard for me to stop laughing at them after reading the above article!

I certainly have something to remember here when I hear the next (unwelcome) solicitation for search-for-a-cure for women’s cancer! It will be very hard for me to forget how apposite the “treatment”–successful or not–of those horrible diseases is to castrating, mutilating, sadistic bitches who find doing this to a harmless and innocent human being to be amusing just because he is a male!

There is a better way of looking at this, isn’t there?

Isn’t the thought of cancer-ridden women going under the knife amusing? Isn’t thought of women losing part, or all, of a sexual organ that is precious to them FUNNY? The pain women experience when recovering from surgery (and radiation or chemo, which is almost as bad) is still less than the agony which that poor man underwent when he underwent castration at the hands of a deranged, sadistic, and vicious she-weasel (my apologies to weasels)!

I almost forgot, for every man who is abused and tortured by his woman, it almost warms my heart that the same hatred and spite characteristic of the female human(?) sets THEM up for a similar fate down the road, as that bitterness, vicious sadism, and bloodthirstiness so characteristic of those who would LAUGH AT the suffering caused by a “woman” committing such a vicious crime predisposes them toward cancer, and (I hope) a similar fate!

Karma is always there, girls, and it is a bitch!! HA HA HA HA HA…LOL!

David K. Meller

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 11
Born Free July 27, 2011 at 19:07

I just finished viewing all of the documentary videos at Manwomanmyth.com. A quote from Queen Victoria, dated 1870, stuck in my head and reminded me of sociopathic display on The Talk:

“Were woman to ‘unsex’ themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection.”

She was a wise woman who knew her own kind very well.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 4
josh July 29, 2011 at 19:23

“I can’t wait to witness the backlash that occurs against women when the majority of men have taken off the kid gloves.” – DogFace Soldier

And yet women never seem to understand this. They think (like male attention when young) men will always want to protect and sacrifice for them forever.

While not cheering for a worldwide collapse, or being overtaken by Muslims, I too wish to see the women’s reactions when men finally decide to “down tools” and let them fend for themselves in this cold world once and for all.

My prediction? Women will either wish to go back to the “good old days” when women sat at home and men did all the work, or they’ll try their level best at getting in good with whoever is in power by that point.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
chi-town August 1, 2011 at 12:25

Its sad that these operations are still performed in the back alley with coat fabric shears. We have already made so much progress in creating a culture of tolerance for this sort of thing that I don’t see why this cannot be taken a step further in a humane and sterile environment. Perhaps we can get out of the dark ages in the Supreme Court “Ho v. Flayed”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 1
Frank August 2, 2011 at 08:15

If I was talking to a woman and she displayed glee at such a thing I would slug her out right then and there.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
POD August 3, 2011 at 12:13

Women by and large are cruel, sadistic whores, playing by society’s rules ( ie, any legal methods ) will be futile – I imagine a few enterprising lawyers might save/reduce some men sentences, but it’ll be a drop in an ocean.

One thing’s for certain, the law and police will not help, the government will not help and MRAs *are* a minority that most blue-pill popping men will vastly outnumber, and therefore control.

The only remaining course of action is to act as individuals. Should any woman attempt to mutilate me, I will go all out and castrate the bitch as the first available moment. I wish more men would awaken and react the same way with women who mean to hurt us. Fight fire with fire, we are at war since millenia, isn’t it high time we hit back with the same decisive force?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 4
Shatteredmen August 10, 2011 at 00:51

I do not watch ABC nor any of the major networks as the all exhibit misandry and even the “fair and balanced” Fox news, shows misandry too. This being said, as the director of Shattered Men, (a ministry to help abused men) I would like to caution everyone to be sure we do not become the enemy you detest. Do not lower yourself to their level.
There are groups that are working hard to expose the feminist agenda and one organization is working to change the Violence Against WOMEN act to make sure it also helps the hidden half of domestic violence. (Actually I do think more men are the victims of domestic abuse than are women now)
Below is information on this but before that, does anyone have the contact information to send complaints to ABC about the fact that Osbourne’s misandry is not an isolated incident, it is a pattern of behavior . We need to voice our outrage of this just as the feminist do when a man merely insults a woman on the air.
Partner Violence Reduction Act Brings Hope to Victims
WASHINGTON, July 11 / U.S. Newswire / — Aiming to amend and strengthen the federal Violence Against Women Act, today the Partner Violence Reduction Act was released for consideration and future enactment by the United States Congress. The proposed law was developed by Stop Abusive and Violent Environments – SAVE — a national victim-advocacy organization.

The Partner Violence Reduction Act will bring hope to abuse victims such as Ebonee Barnes, mother of three. Writing in a Philadelphia-area newspaper, Barnes recently revealed that the “shelters they place us in are beyond unlivable.”

The Partner Violence Reduction Act will also offer hope to persons like Sean Lanigan, a northern Virginia teacher who was falsely accused by a student of sexual assault. As featured in a recent Washington Post expose, the school district refused to restore Lanigan’s full teaching privileges even after a jury found him innocent of all charges.

And the Partner Violence Reduction Act will kindle hope among victims of domestic violence who have been refused help on account of their sex or gender identity. The PVRA will ban discriminatory practices by abuse shelters and other domestic violence services.

Part of the problem stems from overly-broad definitions of abuse. “Right now, just raising your voice counts as ‘domestic violence,’ which clogs the system with trivial and even false complaints,” explains SAVE spokesman Philip Cook. “That forces persons in life-threatening situations to wait their turn and hope for the best.”

The Partner Violence Reduction Act:

1. Gives first priority to real victims and reduces false allegations by constraining definitions and distinguishing between an allegation and a judicial finding of domestic violence.

2. Makes the law gender-inclusive and removes discriminatory policies.

3. Seeks to protect and restore families when the abuse is minor.

4. Removes harmful mandatory arrest, predominant aggressor, and no-drop prosecution policies, thus helping to restore due process.

5. Allows legal assistance to be provided both to the alleged victim and alleged offender.

6. Improves the accountability of domestic violence organizations.

7. Curbs immigration fraud.

8. Removes provisions that violate the Constitution and restores civil rights to the accused.

The full text of the Partner Violence Reduction Act can be seen here: http://www.saveservices.org/pvra . SAVE is a victim-advocacy group working for evidence-based solutions to partner violence.


Ebonee Barnes: http://www.phillyburbs.com/news/local/burlington_county_times_news/opinion/letters_to_editor/there-should-be-better-safer-alternatives-for-homeless-women/article_20a0bf62-1c7f-5082-9074-c30ed29243de.html

Sean Lanigan: http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/fairfax-teacher-sean-lanigan-still-suffering-from-false-molestation-allegations/2011/03/04/AFVwhh3G_story.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Fred Smook January 21, 2012 at 14:30

Sharon Osbourne is a disgrace for the human race. She should be removed out of all Tv or Programs. She must be made an example. She’s. a feminist and ugly lesbian Shame on her!!!!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 4
LT56 February 9, 2012 at 09:21

Taking a few steps back, it’s typical. To coin a phrase (I don’t know if someone has already said this); “The oppressed usually becomes an oppressor”.
Look at any oppressed group and it follows the same cycle: they rise up, they begin to reach equality, it starts to go to their head, and they unconciously become oppressive themselves.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
Anonymous February 23, 2012 at 15:29

Really makes you wish God only took a rib to play fetch with Fido, eh?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Allegra August 8, 2012 at 19:53

I am ashamed of my fellow women. I am considering not letting my daughters interact with other girls their age on any really close level or watching tv–if they are closed off from the world, perhaps they won’t be the bitches these women are. Women don’t understand that their hateful, bitchy, cat-like behavior is making THEM miserable. I hate, HATE feminism with a passion–it is entirely about women trying to get the upper hand, part of the Fall–but they will never completely succeed because they’re just not capable. They’re women. Followers. Always will be.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
TruthBeTold August 13, 2012 at 15:06

Actully its not “Women” in general… actions like this and the basic horrible attitude of “women” are limited to “AMERICAN” women. Other places dont have bitches that act like usa girls.

This is why I never date american women.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Eric Power September 10, 2012 at 02:44

For years I’ve noticed that women get leaner sentences for crimes. If a man has cut off a womans sex organs and killed her, he could be considered a psychopathic beast but when women do it they get off lightly on the usual “mental issues” grounds.

Here are a couple of recent Australian examples:
Short stint in jail for woman who killed partner by cutting off his penis

Woman pleads guilty to manslaughter of man who was beaten to death and had penis cut off:

Family Law is known as a pre-judicial revenge system with legalised theft or wealth redistribution from men to women. However, increasingly women are realising they will be treated with kid gloves under Criminal Law also – essentially, in Australia women get away with murder (if the victim is male or a child)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Eric Power September 10, 2012 at 02:50

…. declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

This is where it stems from:

The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt
Timothy Matthews – Catholic Insight March 2009


Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Lucy February 6, 2013 at 10:50

I am a woman and I agree wholeheartedly with the article and most of the comments. The overwhelming majority of women (in America at least) are inhumane…not only to men but also to their own sex.

I have learned this the hard way. When I was coming of age 16 yrs. ago I went through a couple of minor learning experiences that involved people in committed relationships. I always viewed them as private, quickly grew stronger for myself and grew up.

7 yrs. ago a catty neighbor mom passively dug for dirt on me. I blushed, she spread false rumors. I explained my minor, minor thing
but women left and right CHOOSE to hate me more. They choose to gossip and ostracize and hate and shame me forever. As a big, bullying group.

If I make a new friend, they immediately tell her lies about me. If I get a job or experience success, they aim to have me fired and sabotage me in any way they legally can.

My friends, women are callous, inhumane, cruel and sadistic at their core. I can’t figure out the root cause of it. I can’t decipher if it’s taught or biological. I think it’s both.

I myself never judge, hate, or gossip anyone. People’s private lives are just that: private. If word got out on someone I would have compassion for them and be their friend. Even if they were ‘sinning’ today.

I agree feminism is crap. In Oregon where I live people are very moral and puritanical. I moved here from Arizona 7 yrs ago. Arizona tends to have a very opposite culture from Oregon. I suspect the lack of sun lends toward a lesser libido? The differences are striking.

I don’t know what will become of our world. I like men so much better than women. I find men to be honest, rational, truly truly caring, and true friends. Is it nature’s way to allow for the baby-carriers to seize power, terrorize, and destroy so many? It seems so dark ages and deevolved and counter to understanding and growth…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 2
Lucy February 6, 2013 at 11:01

p.s. Technically I was involved with just one committed person for one brief encounter (he had a girlfriend and we didn’t even have sex or kiss).

But women don’t care how ‘minor’ it was nor how long ago. They will hate and hurt and lie forever. They LOVE doing it. All those women out there are ITCHING to see guilt on another woman’s face so they can take her down. Actually that is a huge understatement.

I myself know people who’ve had affairs, left their married partner for another married person, etc. I don’t even want to know. And if/when I do, I feel compassion for them and understanding of their humanity. Honestly, I think monogamy isn’t natural for a ton of people. But that is a whole other topic.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 2
Hunter from a Bygones Age August 10, 2013 at 06:35

@Born Free

A quote from Queen Victoria, dated 1870, stuck in my head and reminded me of sociopathic display on The Talk:

“Were woman to ‘unsex’ themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection.”

^^^— God save the Queen! If I were a Briton to have had her as a Queen, I would have gladly loved a wise Queen like her. Nonetheless, had Victoria become a President and quoted this herself today, imagine the backlash she would receive from all feminists around the globe.


I can imagine the thoughts that race through your mind when you posted the comments dated Feb. 6, 2013 at respectively 10:50 and 11:01. At first, I sympathized with you. With a long hard thought, I stopped. The reason why? You share a “free love” view that I don’t share.

Let me start off by saying that you keep repeating minor, minor, and minor, then contrast your compassion for those who have had adulterous relationships and have pursued more adulterous avenues with other partners; this is a cheap, albeit clever ploy for the unsuspecting.

Whatever minor bullshit you have pulled back then matters none today. It’s in the past so why bring it up? This is a very man-friendly forum, not likely for any woman pushing any pro-feminist bullshit here. You did not quote the man’s name, nor did you have respect for yourself when you decided to stay with that “committed” person who had a girlfriend. What part of the word girlfriend did you not know? It means he’s off the market! Off the fucking territory! It’s the same as you being a homewrecker, wrecking a married man’s life by sucking his cock, banging him behind his wife’s or wives’ back! There’s no doubt why women have hated you. You have sidelined women out of their men’s lives by getting yourself involved.

Having compassion for adultery is the same as having compassion for any immoral sin, including up to murder. I have to wonder, are you logically sane without emotional insanity or just emotionally insane without any sane logic? Adultery is a very big thing today with many men as much as it was back then for many women. There was an older man, not having much left to live and about to croak, commented so much on the book Men on Strike that he rehashed his life experiences regarding the 50′s, 60′s, and so on; he remarked how easy it is for women today to divorce so quickly, to have sex so freely, and to seek love in their emotionally charged world. He also said that the advent of the birth control pill, pornography, and the broadening of divorce clauses have opened the dam for worldwide destruction sowed by women in their own wake. It is no wonder an individual being, like yourself having the “blessings” of a vaginae, could have so much compassion for the adulteries of either sex. You can thank feminism for opening your mind to damnable things that will never repair your life so fully and freely. Damned are we as foolish men if we listen to you once. Damned are we as men if we listen to you twice.

You honestly have no respect for yourself nor do you have any respect for any man who wants to marry someone who is emotionally sane; these types of women are very few in this world, and if any, would be found in the EE countries according to many sources. Be prepared for Queen Victoria has correctly spoken on the unsexing of women from men, to champion themselves to a futile cause that would carefully and systematically destroy the ideal family: a family of moral values, pride, patriotism, and sticking together no matter what.

Continue in your slattern path of celebrating what is good in evil, what is evil in good; you will end up with or without the truth. When truth has thrown you a huge back right in your face with sudden realization, who would be standing or crying with you? No one else but yourself.

Hold yourself accountable, woman! Otherwise, more men will just find you hard to believe, as much as I have.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Clay November 27, 2013 at 04:38

This sort of dribble is the end of this nation. Fifty years ago people would be marching in the streets. These women would be hung from the telephone poles, and everyone who walked by would look on them narrowly and wag their heads.
Right now, men in England are running to Muslim courts because it is the only place where they can find some sense of justice. How appalling is that? We are sinking. When the evil runs so deep that one must go to what was once thought the ultimate evil, because it turns out to be the lesser evil, then it is time to flee the new deeper evil. And men are doing it. They are leaving this country. If I don’t see a change I will leave within five years. I will never, no not, have children and raise them around this sickness. It is my vehement stand that I will never raise children in this situation. My god, to think that my daughter may end up being my savage enemy after the feminists are done with her. What a horrible prospect. Any nation that falls into this kind of ill-repute shall fall into the depths of genocide, murder, and holocaust. There is no other way. It is a new and deeper evil, more evil than The Third Reich, and it will fall even harder. The whole worlds ears hear the savagery of the feminists, and they will not stand for it. Man the free press throughout the world! Man the ostracization of feminists! Man the shouting of truth and justice! Man the traditional families! Man the old way of truth, mutual respect, and chivalry! Let the feminists be shunned in the streets, at the coffee shops, at the public schools. Let there insecurity and low self-esteem ever grow until they no longer walk in the streets for fear of ridicule.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Clay November 27, 2013 at 05:22

I have to agree with CodeBreaker. The alpha male idea is not the whole truth. Women and men have much more in common that people think. Women want to sleep with the alpha male in the same way that men want to sleep with Playboy Centerfold’s. The only difference is that Playboy Centerfold’s will sleep with only a small handful of men, while alpha male’s might sleep with a thousand women. A woman’s chance at a night with an alpha male is much greater than a man’s chance with Miss Playboy. But after the one night stands and big dick’s get old, the real truth of the woman comes out, and that is that she wants a deep, committed relationship with a guy who loves her, cares about her, treats her with respect…ect. Men want the same thing and will give up on looking for Miss Playboy, eventually. That’s why feminism is so dangerous, because it is trying to recreate women into these tribal like mountain women who kill for thrill, sleep with everything in sight, and dominate weaker species. And as we all know, women are much more easily brainwashed by media, which is why they fall for this garbage.
You think all they want is the alpha? This is not true. If it were then we’d set up breeding farms with guys like Brad Pitt and they would go have their one hour session about once a month and everyone would be happy. We’d set up houses of prostitution for the men so that they don’t turn into animals and kill everyone…..there it is….the perfect society. But we know this is not true about the human heart. Marriage works because we are a monogamous animal. It’s in our nature. Geese are like this, and no one told them that it was the best way to live. It is just their natural chemicals telling them to be monogamous. Coyotes and mallard ducks are the same way….and there are others in the animal kingdom that are like that. We are monogamous too, but we have the ability to think and contemplate, which is why we can entertain thoughts of committing adultery. Whether we do it or not really depends on how horrible of a relationship we are in, which is really what marriage is, just a relationship.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Buffy January 27, 2014 at 20:57

One enormous weapon which would greatly aid in the destruction and downfall of the feminist female supremacy hate movement is television. It is still the medium which reaches the greatest number of people on earth. It would be wonderful to see talk shows, I mean classy talk shows like Oprah, not shit like “The Talk” and “The View” address misandry and feminist hate propaganda. There should be no end of documentaries and news shows dealing with theses subjects. As things are now no television network has the guts or the balls to address misandry. That is how powerful, controlling, and dictatorial feminism has become. It has saturated and taken over the public schools, the universities, the work place, the legal system, and the media. The greatest challenge of MRM activists today is to spread awareness of the female supremacy hate movement. This can only be accomplished completely with televised information. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to see hate monger Gloria Steinem taken to task by asking her some hard hitting questions about her feelings on the institutionalized hatred that is directed toward men every day instead of being praised as the great savior of womankind as is always the case? Also, examples of man hate, prevalent everywhere on the internet should be televised on an ongoing basis. People need to be made aware just how poisonous and pervasive feminist hatred and degradation of men has become so it can be stopped, and television is the ultimate way of doing this. Lets get millions more men angry and down right pissed off enough to organize and destroy feminist hate. It sickens me that our gutless feminist ass kissing mangina president gave our countries highest civilian honor “The Presidential Medal of Freedom” to Queen man hater “Ms” Gloria Steinem. This truly shows how deep into death and destruction the United States has fallen.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 4 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: