Decline of Masculinity Accompanied by Decline of Liberty

by W.F. Price on June 2, 2011

It’s pretty clear that our day to day lives in the US have become far more regulated and dull than the lives of Americans a generation ago. We technically have freedoms, but they have been systematically stripped from us through economic and institutional pressure. For example, political correctness on campus, which was simply an expression of militant leftism back in the 1980s, has been codified at most schools, and both students and professors who run afoul of the speech standards will pay a price. Writing something politically provocative online, or simply saying it to a coworker, can often result in failure to get some job or even outright firing. People are frightened to voice their opinions — and for good reason.

But it goes a lot farther than that. Regulations around parenting are more comprehensive than ever, so consequently we see far fewer kids playing outside than we used to. Another obvious result of the increased regulation of society is our extremely high incarceration rate, but the effects are felt far beyond the walls of correctional facilities.

There is something to be said for this regimentation of society; kids are safer than they used to be, crime has dropped, accidental death rates have declined and productivity has arguably increased. But at what cost comes this nanny state?

I’d argue that part of the price we pay is our very masculinity, which has become suspect and all but criminalized. Masculine values, such as speaking one’s mind without regard for social conventions or political correctness, have taken a back seat to “harmony” and getting along. Schools have become utterly dull institutions where young men are bludgeoned into silence by an overwhelming consensus about what is acceptable. Dishonesty has become the norm in media, where platitudes take the place of frank, open honesty. Additionally, while those who have political privileges strive to create extra penalties for those who criticize them (e.g. hate crime laws), those who are out of favor become eternal scapegoats toward whom it is permissible – even encouraged – to direct invective.

Although the rights put in place by the founding fathers still exist on paper, the spirit of those times is utterly gone. We have gone from a nation of fiercely independent, egalitarian men to one of sniveling cowards and scraping sycophants. SWPL social conventions dominate our higher institutions, where there is no room for a dissenting, masculine voice. In fact, even the Tea Party, which is something of a reaction against this state of affairs, has come to be dominated by ambitious women, possibly because nobody can imagine a man getting away with speaking his mind in a radical, confrontational manner.

There will always be those of us who will break the mold and speak our minds anyway, whether it be due to our nature, circumstances or simply lack of concern for the unwritten rules, but it is tragic that so many men do not believe they have this opportunity. However, this can change. Many of the consequences of speaking out are far less severe than people imagine, and in many cases the result is an increase in one’s mental health and a rise in perceived quality of life. Being open and honest is liberating, and can lift the spirit. It is also empowering, in that people will often find that others agree.

Finally, there is only one way to gain respect for masculinity: exercise it.

{ 110 comments… read them below or add one }

Hedgewolf June 2, 2011 at 10:51

The answer: new regulations to protest us from the damage the old regulations did.

The host dies, the parasite lives on.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 2
Ken June 2, 2011 at 10:52

“those who have political privileges strive to create extra penalties for those who criticize them (e.g. hate crime laws), those who are out of favor become eternal scapegoats toward whom it is permissible – even encouraged – to direct invective” >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Yes, and Comrade Stalin would be proud of what is transpiring in American of the early 21st century~suppression of free speech without gulag camps! (least for now). Give special “rights” to a few special groups and then demonize the majority and silence opposition with the threat of a job loss or financial ruin as the “stick”. When that fails, and it eventually will with increasing numbers of men unemployed….then come the police batons and paddy-wagons.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 41 Thumb down 5
Firepower June 2, 2011 at 10:54

As American culture decays further into pure bread and circus videogaming, inevitable decline accompanies the loss of educated idealism and hope.

Dread sinks in when realizing the vast wealth of America means a long, slow descent into deeper turmoil.

Once educated “papers of record” such as the New York Times are now – for the first time ever – run editorially by a woman. The skew shall continue, all the way into the abyss.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 8
only known as Joshua June 2, 2011 at 11:08

men are the builders. It’s our gift and our curse. I don’t believe in gay masculinity, girly men, or some other foolishness.

With decline of masculinity, and the rise of feminized schmoes. Cometh trying times.

I remember an old Swampy Cree proverb, roughly translated. “make what you need.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 1
Demonspawn June 2, 2011 at 11:09

Well, when you let women vote, the nanny state happens.

Hell, even Switzerland (women’s suffrage in 1971) with it’s long history of gun ownership, only lasted 30 years after the women’s vote before gun control started.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 77 Thumb down 3
Lovekraft June 2, 2011 at 11:11

Let’s not forget also how political correctness (aversion to racial profiling) and bureaucratic in-fighting allowed 21 Saudi men to board 4 commercial airliners and wreak unspeakable mayhem.

Common sense and a closer communal connection would have plucked these ‘pilots-in-training’ out of the circuit or, better yet, prevented them from even stepping foot on American soil.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 39 Thumb down 17
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 11:11

OT but you men will want to take a look into this one. And please pass far and wide.

So there was a bit of a ‘cat fight’ in the Australian Parliament this week. A woman calling herself Penny Wong, whom I have called “Princess Penny Wong” was rebuked with….oh the shock horror, a MEOW sound from a man calling himself David Bushby.

You know. She’s only the Finance Minister. She’s one of these “strong” and “independent women” but apparently this little cat call was more than she could stand and she demanded an apology from David. And, being the mangina he is? He gave it.

Here is the link.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/senator-david-bushbys-cat-call-to-penny-wong-starts-a-feral-row/story-e6freuzr-1226067502768

So I have written a letter to all Australian MALE members of parliament to issue a four part challenge to them.

1. Denounce “Princess Penny Wong” for the liar and hypocrite she is.
2. Challenge these women to complete a bonded affidavit of lawful equality.
3. Stop altering language or demeanour just because an “equal woman” is present
4. Re-affirm my claim of right that all men in Australia have the freedom to associate with whoever they please and parliament can not force men to associate with people they choose not to associate with.

The letter is here.
http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/80/threadid/464/scope/posts/Default.aspx

I will post email addresses in the next post.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 10
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 11:11

In case you want to tell him what a mangina he is.

[email protected]

And in case any woman want to tell her what a precious princess she is.

[email protected]

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 8
Taqman June 2, 2011 at 11:26

Quote:


In fact, even the Tea Party, which is something of a reaction against this state of affairs, has come to be dominated by ambitious women, possibly because nobody can imagine a man getting away with speaking his mind in a radical, confrontational manner. ”

The Tea Party is nothing more than a bunch of Johny-come-lately fools who have spent the past few decades cheering on as Social and Neo-Cons built up the state when the Bushes and other Republicans were in power.

Only now after it is far far too late do they begin to wake up.

I still doubt their sincerity and commitment to limited government. I predict that if a Republican wins the White House in 2012 nothing will really change, and the Tea Party will go right back to sleep. They will become mouth pieces for GOP party line just like they were back in 2006.

In fact, look out for another war Iran or North Korea to distract and rally the masses.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 32 Thumb down 11
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 11:35

Talking about the decline of masculinity….this is what I send to Mangina David Busby. Others might like to do something similar. Lets embarass the hell out of this mangina and tell him that HE does NOT re-present MEN. And we are SICK of our politicians being such manginas as this.

—–Original Message—–
From: Peter Nolan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 02 June 2011 20:33
To: ‘[email protected]
Subject: Welcome to my Mangina Hall of Fame David

Hi David,
I read all about your grovelling apology to Princess Penny Wong.

What a loser you are.

You just made my mangina hall of fame.

You can find your entry here.

http://www.peternolan.com/Forums/tabid/420/mid/1087/threadid/754/scope/posts/Default.aspx#754

How dare you try can claim you re-present men like me when you are this much of a piss weak mangina that you can be trampled all over by a woman!

I chose to use your act of cowardice and compliance as a focal point to men to point our that there is this little thing called FREEDOM OF SPEECH and that men who back off from women like this on the pretended “offence” by women are just complete manginas.

Grow some balls David. Or get the fuck out of politics.

By the way. I am the man who is one of the leaders of the effort to re-introduce the rule of law into Australia.

You politicians have a lot to answer for.

Perhaps you are the first one who might strap on some balls and expose your fellow criminals in the senate and house of reps.

After all? You are already a laughing stock among men. What have YOU got to lose now?

With no regard at all because you are a mangina.

Peter-Andrew: Nolan©

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 35 Thumb down 16
Legion June 2, 2011 at 11:41

The Tea Party hasn’t become dominated by women. It was started by a women (housewife in Kentucky or Tennessee) and even in the hayday of calling them teabaggers it was 55% women. So women have always dominated the Tea Party.

As far as the repub party (of stupids) goes, I’m ready for a 3rd party and throwing these asshats into the garbage.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 34 Thumb down 3
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 11:44

“Yes, and Comrade Stalin would be proud of what is transpiring in American of the early 21st century~suppression of free speech without gulag camps! ”

Really?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0P-hvPJPTi4

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
Firepower June 2, 2011 at 11:53

Lovekraft

Let’s not forget also how political correctness (aversion to racial profiling) and bureaucratic in-fighting allowed 21 Saudi men to board 4 commercial airliners and wreak unspeakable mayhem.

That’s apparent.

The current, pressing problem is now one of: What fate does a country have in store, that still permits such political correctness…ELEVEN YEARS later.

Common sense and a closer communal connection would have plucked these ‘pilots-in-training’ out of the circuit or, better yet, prevented them from even stepping foot on American soil.

It must be apparent, also, that there is no such thing as “common sense,” for if there were – you’d have “smart people” in power. Shoulda coulda woulda never works. Ever.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 4
Quartermain June 2, 2011 at 11:58

The way things are now, common sense should be called un-common sense.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 0
Firepower June 2, 2011 at 12:15

Quartermain

The way things are now, common sense should be called un-common sense.

Indeed. Pleading for common sense (especially today) is like pleading for society to “behave themselves.” It just does not plain work.

It’s a nice thought, but it cannot combat facts so apparent in an article entitled “Decline of Masculinity Accompanied by Decline of Liberty.”
That statement is workable – provable. Realistic.

The era of nice thoughts is over.
You can quote me on it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 1
only known as Joshua June 2, 2011 at 12:22

Off topic,
at the risk appearing to be senseless, and somewhat foolish.

I heard somewhere that feminist she-cats are only good for dry runs. But not without it’s dangers.

it would leave a man in great peril, after passing out. While a woman thinks.
if she’s buying, or paying for room. once the groin action commences, the pecker pecking away, a woman glowering at you with no reason.

Angry sex on her part, a little diversion on his part. Like sticking your head in gator’s mouth

passing the test, only to go through the test yet again.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 3
livingwell June 2, 2011 at 12:35

Goodbye art, goodbye innovation and creativity…hello safety.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-phonehenge-west-20110526,0,797986.story

Men create, women tear it down.
Women start the fights that only men finish.
No more for me. I no longer support this mess…let it go men!

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 3
Towgunner June 2, 2011 at 12:48

“There is something to be said for this regimentation of society; kids are safer than they used to be, crime has dropped, accidental death rates have declined and productivity has arguably increased. But at what cost comes this nanny state?”

Not so fast WF. Respectfully, improvements in society on aggregate reflect the persistent, yet, dying sacrifice of generations past and their masculinity. What we are witnessing right now with the so called rise of women is a broad base decline, what does that tell you? In terms of economics we stand on the precipice of utter disaster. Much of the advancements we have seen over the past 20 years have had nothing to do with feminism or the touchy feely offshoots, rather the easy credit that our central bankers enabled and a willing world to buy into it. That is going to come to an end as we are facing another QE phase. When the easy money is gone this system and every grandiose social engineering scheme will crash and die a horrible and rapid death. In short, the new system, which I believe will be a global currency and government, will spread economic resources away from the US to the rest of the world, namely the developing nations such as China and India. When reality hits the US, the easy money will be gone and with that the pie in the sky notions of absolute egalitarianism, utopia etc. Importantly, the funding for these pies in the sky ideas will be gone too.

Today the new york times gleefully announced a women will run it. Let’s do some quick deconstruction of this event. What the heck is the nyt and print media anyway? Does anyone even trust the mainstream media anymore, no. The nyt has proven to be shell of its once great self, a victim of its own ideology. Who cares if a women runs it, what’s that mean, after all it’s been feminist-centric for years.

Gentlemen, get away from all this negativity. Yeah, things are bad. But men are not inferior to women; boys are not inferior to girls. Everything you see around you was envisioned, designed, financed and built by men…everything. If women were soooo superior in everything compared to men why wasn’t it a woman that discovered the sun is the center of the solar system? Why wasn’t it a woman that circumnavigated the globe? Where is the female equivalent to Shakespeare or Michelangelo? Where are these break-out geniuses today even? This phallic conspiracy bullshit can only explain so much especially in light of today’s claim that men are vastly inferior to women. If so, why wait this long? Truth; there was/is no phallic conspiracy. Did the Apaches email the Moors who told the Goths? What? There was no instant communication for most of history, how could there have been this organized and systematic phallic brotherhood? Answer: it was just nature and the way things are and ought to be. Funny how women now claim to be “independent”…what is the cost of that, I’ll tell you – men’s independence! We have to stop and consider that this system is unsustainable, unfair and leading the entire human race down a path that is nothing less than right out of a horror/science fiction movie.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 53 Thumb down 3
livingwell June 2, 2011 at 12:49

Re:
Above mentioned fem-rules.

Man up. Fuck off.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 12
only known as Joshua June 2, 2011 at 13:16

I wonder if feminism is anti-innovation. It seems that women hate innovation, ergo they introduce laws that make no sense.

To her a building is an eyesore. But to her a shoe is a thing of beauty.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 5
Towgunner June 2, 2011 at 13:53

Yes, feminism is anti-innovation because women aren’t programmed for that kind of thing. Furthermore, what we see across the board is a lowering of standards and, therefore, restriction of the male tendency to innovate because they are ‘leveling the playing field’. Our ever-superior females must bring others down to make it appear they are moving up. Makes no sense whatsoever. Shoes: volumes can be written about shoes, bags and females. Bottom-line: obsession with shoes and bags is proof of female irrationality and every reason to keep the “feminine” perspective capped. There is no practical purpose for female shoes, especially heels, and obnoxious bags. Both are pathetic appendages meant to supplement a persistent lack of self esteem.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 1
Commander Shepard June 2, 2011 at 13:56

“Goodbye art, goodbye innovation and creativity…hello safety.” – livingwell

The feminist utopia is almost here. No employment anywhere except as government bureaucrats.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 2
Checkit June 2, 2011 at 14:04

Crime rates have not dropped. Look it up.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 18 Thumb down 2
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 14:13

|Decline of Masculinity Accompanied by Decline of Liberty|

Perhaps, but it has in itself the seed of resurrection. The bold will rise, as they did when they conquered the wild west.

But the time has not come yet. There’s some more Karma coming.

A new way of living is emerging as marriage falls by the wayside.

The death of marriage will shake off the govmin’s hold on men’s collective throat.

That which enslaves men must die.

Today is obsolete: men must invent tomorrow. That’s the key to freedom.

The net has become our collective unconscious. There’s no need for a structured movement which can be taken down.

The next phase of the gender war will be fought on the net.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 2
Herbal Essence June 2, 2011 at 14:19

As I’m sure many guys here can identify with, I’ve been hollering about the ever-growing Police State for most of my lifetime. I was talking about some of these issues in junior high school. In college I watched the Twin Towers come down on 9/11 and my first thought was “Oh crap here comes the jackboots.” Recently, I’ve been enlightened by you fine gentlemen (among others) how Feminism is a part of all this too. In my personal life and online, I’ve repeatedly made all the arguments as to why people should oppose this stuff. I’ve partnered with political parties as well as nonprofits to try to encourage fellow americans to hold onto our liberties.

And the sad fact is, I’ve come to the conclusion that the Police State is what the herd wants.

What are we to do? The ruling class would LOVE LOVE LOVE for there to be some kind of armed insurrection. That makes it all the easier for the red-pill takers to get squashed once and for all. So unless I want to leave the country (as has crossed my mind) there’s not much I can do other than MGTOW, do what I can, try to enjoy my life, and then say “I told you so” to the sheep when we’re living in an overt dictatorship.

It’s a fucking disgrace. America, we hardly knew ye.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 55 Thumb down 1
Keyster June 2, 2011 at 14:54

Exercise something that’s slowly been exorcised.
But who are our role models?

We have to look back to John Wayne, Charlton Heston, Bogie, etc.
Stout men of vigor and principle, in art and in life.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 15:04

OT.
You guys in the US will be seeing reports on this.

http://www.smh.com.au/world/justice-for-jaycee-dugard-as-kidnappers-sentenced-20110603-1fjfe.html

Notice the mans sentence is more than 10x the womans sentence despite the fact the woman was FULLY COMPLIANT in the crime.

It has long been established that if you aid and abet a criminal you hold equal responsibility for the crime and equal liability and responsibility for the outcomes.

Under that rule many a lookout for a bank robery has been sentenced for accessory to murder should one of the bank robbing team kill someone during the process.

The blatant sex discrimination of 10 to 1 for a woman who was clearly fully complicit in a crime spanning many years is just more evidence of the HATRED women have towards men.

I was watching CNN tonight and a reporter talked about the MAN who was a MONSTER who imprisoned this girl while NOT EVEN MENTIONING the fact that the woman was FULLY COMPLICIT.

That WOMEN will not scream blue murder at the 10 to 1 sentencing differential makes it clear to every man who reads this post how much WOMEN HATE MEN in the west now.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 40 Thumb down 6
SingleDad June 2, 2011 at 15:25

@ Checklit

Your right. They’re lying.

It looks like crime rates dropped from modestly from 1980-2000 then leveled off and looks pretty much steady from 2000-2011.

http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/2011/tables/11s0308.pdf

Incarceration rates (inmates per 100,000 population) were about 150-200 from 1925-1980 then rose dramatically from 1980-2000 from 200 to 686 then rose more gradually from 2000-2005 from 686-742.

http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/y/ratesusa.htm#years

This is not a nanny state, this is a prison state.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 24 Thumb down 1
Taqman June 2, 2011 at 15:26

Re: Dugard Kidnappers

That dude must have some mean game if he was able to convince his wife to allow him to kidnap and maintain an 11 year old sex slave.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2
Taqman June 2, 2011 at 15:35

It has been hypothesized that the reason for the drop in crime rats from 1980-2000 was the after affect of the legalization of abortion which culled large numbers of children who would have been raised under difficult circumstances.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Lovekraft June 2, 2011 at 15:37

@ Herbal Essence:

despair not, for in your mind the truth can never be defeated. The MRM is only in it’s early stages as far as taking the battle to the enemy, and is growing each time the left lies.

If you need some encouragement, I suggest going to youtube and check out some Tom Leykis shows under the channel LVJ1112. Many radio shows about the joys of being a bachelor and snubbing the entitlement princesses.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 2
Dubcik June 2, 2011 at 15:40

This feminist and her mangina husband are starting early to teach their children not to celebrate their sex, but rather to reject it. They pretend to be gender neutral, but it is no coincidence both her sons are most often thought to be boys. Their infant, whether male or female, will no doubt also be as confused.

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/canada/Baby+Storm+gender+parenting+media/4856804/story.html

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0
Dubcik June 2, 2011 at 15:42

whoops should read “not to celebrate their gender….” and “…most often thought to be girls….”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
SingleDad June 2, 2011 at 15:44

And the Femborg isn’t commenting on and article that looks like their calling those concerned about the police state concern trolls:

“Fears of corperate police state”

http://www.salon.com/news/david_sirota/2011/06/02/america_corporate_police_state/index.html

Very few commentors but those who do are very critical of the left. It seems like their starting to get the message.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
DevilDog June 2, 2011 at 15:53

The Tea Party – Useless idiots, blithering fools.

Feminists – Useful idiots to use in establishing a police state.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 18 Thumb down 4
GT66 June 2, 2011 at 16:18

Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), sometimes I think you’re a bit out there but other times it’s becomes apparent that you’re a trouble maker and I really admire that.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 22 Thumb down 2
EconMan June 2, 2011 at 16:32

All those things you mentioned that have decreased were trending downward long before the regulatory state. Regulations have, generally speaking, had no discernible effect whatsoever

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2
TFH June 2, 2011 at 16:37

Bill would provide rights to duped dads :

http://www.fathersandfamilies.org/?p=16378

Now, if there is to be a Men’s Rights Movement, support this bill.

…and POST FLYERS IN STRATEGIC LOCATIONS to bring visibility to this. When the misandrists protest the bill, more ordinary people will see their true colors.

If you can’t take an action as simple as posting flyers for this specific bill, you have no right to expect others to take action for your benefit.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 0
SingleDad June 2, 2011 at 17:01

@ THF

I suppose this falls on the heels of another state that passed similar legisltation that DNA trumps proximity in determining fatherhood.

It’s about time. These non-sense laws need to fall one at a time.

I’m on Glenns list and will actively support this.

Nice job Glenn.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0
Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 17:02

GT66 June 2, 2011 at 16:18
“Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), sometimes I think you’re a bit out there but other times it’s becomes apparent that you’re a trouble maker and I really admire that.”

Yes. I am a troublemaker…for people who would enslave all of you.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 3
Jack Donovan June 2, 2011 at 17:05

Great piece.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 0
David K. Meller June 2, 2011 at 17:11

@Peter-Andrew:Nolan 6/02/2011–11:11

Luv your post about this character Dave Busby and his grovelling apology to “Princess” Penny Wong. I think that IF he was to offer an apology for his “meow” sound, he should have apologized instead to any pussycats instead, since THEY are so much more intelligent and civil than this Penny Wong–who didn’t belong in the company of men anyway! I also think that the pussycats would have appreciated it more than the noisy and ignorant politicianette (funny that we don’t even have any words for she-politicians, that are suitable for public use) and maybe they would even purr when petted–NOT that anybody wants to ‘pet’ a feminist anyway!!

As far as shaming “mangina” politicians–good luck! Those poor saps are so demoralized–even psychologically and spiritually castrated–that they often take pride–in a sad, pathetic, stumblebum way–for their ability to identify with women and “their” issues! Look at most of the “men(?) in public life, from politics to law, from academia to newsmedia, since at least the 1960′s!

PEACE AND FREEDOM!!
David K. Meller

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 3
Carnivore June 2, 2011 at 17:28

“There is something to be said for this regimentation of society; kids are safer than they used to be, crime has dropped, accidental death rates have declined and productivity has arguably increased. But at what cost comes this nanny state? ”

Based on what? Stats from the same liar government, foundations and think tanks that say there’s minimal inflation? Bill, you’re being too generous with your trust here. Of course the beast will produce facts and figures to justify its ever extending reach.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 0
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 17:28

“GT66 June 2, 2011 at 16:18
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c), sometimes I think you’re a bit out there but other times it’s becomes apparent that you’re a trouble maker and I really admire that.”

I would define him as a “shit disturber”.

A trouble maker can easily be dealt with. Not so a shit disturber.
That’s really what we should all be: shit disturbers of the highest magnitude.

We must bring the stench of this society come to the surface so everybody can smell the shit.

We must throw spokes in the wheels. Just stand your ground and never back off.

Some here have done it. Their names need not be mentioned.

The role models have disappeared?

Tsk…tsk…tsk…: they abound right here on the Spearhead.
Let me suggest that it’s more than role models: aren’t we really all role models for everybody else?
So, there’s an added element: synergy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 17:45

Rebel June 2, 2011 at 17:28
“I would define him as a “shit disturber”.”

I am a man who is speaking the truth and giving men the path to freedom.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 5
Herbal Essence June 2, 2011 at 17:50

TFH- Re: “Duped Dads” bill:

I don’t live in CA but I will spread news of this initiative frequently through my sizable social networks online and offline.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0
Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 17:59

OT.

Rense and Celente…..listen up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR_BMAbYQkY

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 4
MWPeak June 2, 2011 at 18:01

It makes sense that a feminine society is a less free society. The maternal instinct is to view people as vulnerable children in need of nurturing protection. This is why boys are not allowed to become men. The masculine nature is dangerous, rogue and self-assured. It takes risks and risks everything for a greater cause, such as freedom.

Mothers keep their boys at home where they are regulated, limited and safe. Fathers once kicked their boys out into the street and said, “You damn well better learn to work or you’ll forget how to eat.”

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 3
Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 18:13

OT….listen to this man.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciXj4OGEdHg

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 5
Ryu June 2, 2011 at 18:38

Are kids safer than they used to be? I don’t think so. There were more beatings and more bullying, but that is preferable to shootings. Safer from what? I’ve heard that the TSA is becoming involved in school security, and one school had students removing socks and shoes to get in. I can remember when gangs fought with fists, chains, and bricks instead of guns.

My impression of crime rates is that the numbers are terrifically easy to cook. Additionally, one can change the definition of the crime to suit one’s needs, like feminists lowering the threshold for what consitutes rape.

I would trade all the “advances” of the last 30 years to live back in 1982. For the average American, this amounts to turning in your PC and cell phone. I know this is a MRM site, but during exactly the same time period, the immigration laws changed as well. As America get browner, it will become more like Mexico.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 23 Thumb down 3
Lara June 2, 2011 at 19:01

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 47
GT66 June 2, 2011 at 19:10

Rebel, uhm yeah… shit disturber sounds about as marketable as a brown finger ribbon for prostate awareness would be. I get your idea though.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0
GT66 June 2, 2011 at 19:13

Lara bleated: “Every time I meet foreign men I am reminded how wussy American men have become.”

And every time I meet a foreign woman I am reminded how fat, insolent and vulgar American women have become.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 56 Thumb down 2
Seamus the Classicist June 2, 2011 at 19:14

@Lara,

Yeah because American men have to wussify themselves to deal with women like you.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 33 Thumb down 2
Hayden June 2, 2011 at 19:26

Lara,
Be glad that discriminatory laws like the VAWA keep the majority of American men pussifies, or dumbass AWs like you would be issued daily beatings. However, I get the feeling you might like that you softbodied little estrogen blob. Have a great night cupcake.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 37 Thumb down 2
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 20:02

“Peter-Andrew:Nolan(c) June 2, 2011 at 17:45
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 17:28
“I would define him as a “shit disturber”.”

I am a man who is speaking the truth and giving men the path to freedom.”

Precisely what I said… using different words.

A shit disturber is one who speaks the truth (re:1984)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 20:04

“Lara June 2, 2011 at 19:01
Every time I meet foreign men I am reminded how wussy American men have become.”

You mean what your kind has made them?

This is the shit you made, lady.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 2
codebuster June 2, 2011 at 20:05

This is an important post by Mr Price. Implicitly, it addresses the fundamental cultural forces of individualism (masculinity) versus collectivism (matriarchy). Too much individualism, and society (culture) becomes unsustainable. Too much collectivism, and society increasingly acquires the characteristics of an insect colony.

With its directness, honesty and courage, true individualism is freedom. But individualism is a prize that can only be won and sustained through moral individualism. Individualism motivated in self-interest drives society into the dust, and it is the regulatory, policing, matriarchal nanny-state that comes to its rescue.

Individualism motivated in self-interest is logically contradictory to true individualism because it has within it the seeds of groupthink, with the need to define one’s purpose according to the terms of others – you can never completely escape the need to negotiate with morons.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 3
only known as Joshua June 2, 2011 at 20:13

I am not all surprised of what I keep reading. Disturbing as it is.
I find it extremely distasteful that some pervert of the local school principal who would bring TSA to local school publicly shame the kids.

Sexual molestation continues. Although I don’t condone vigilantism. It’s a damn shame, that is not legal to kill the bastard or the fem-bastard who molest little children. I am not going to say much what’s on my mind. But molesting a child who is 10 years of age or younger is a very despicable deed.

In a twisted leftist minds, they don’t view as children including male children as victims. Oh no, they consider them as punching bags, pin cushion and dolls. That’s one f***ed up notion.

No man and a woman has a right to treat children as sex toys. Yet feminists, including the effeminate men treat children as props and public displays.
if it were up to me, I would find creative ways of meting out discomfort.

I sure hope that I don’t pop my blood vessel, if some woman started to fiddle with herself in public, or some ugly woman walking topless. I don’t want to pollute my mind with their filth. And I suspect that a mangina or man with a pussy is around the corner.

In these times, men need to be angry. Too much shenanigans are going about.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 7
Binxton June 2, 2011 at 20:25

Be glad that discriminatory laws like the VAWA keep the majority of American men pussifies, or dumbass AWs like you would be issued daily beatings.

It is questionable whether most American men would beat their wives with reckless abandon if VAWA were abolished.

But even if some men decided, as a consequence, to act brutishly without just cause towards women, it is still no justification whatsoever for dis-allowing all men from using physical force against women.

You cannot have proper behavior from women without male physical force to ensure or enforce it. Male domination over women is not only natural, it is essential for liberty in the western world.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 4
Denis June 2, 2011 at 21:05

“Masculine values, such as speaking one’s mind without regard for social conventions or political correctness, have taken a back seat to “harmony” and getting along.“

-Was this ever a trait of men to speak against social conventions? I think that it was far more difficult in the past to speak out against the majority(Darwin, Galileo). Social conventions are already breaking down and so is political correctness.

“Dishonesty has become the norm in media”

-Are you sure that honesty was ever the norm or is it just a lot more ubiquitous in the information age.

I’ll just leave this:

http://www.sonofthesouth.net/revolutionary-war/colonies/salem-witch-trials.htm

Sound familiar?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 5
john thames June 2, 2011 at 21:23

This is a very good article which makes a very important point.

I speak with considerable experience on this one because I was fired and blacklisted from my profession for twenty years – that’s right people – twenty unemployed years – because I dared to ciriticize one particular eternally persecuted group. How have I survived? By a large inheritance and some very successful investing coupled with a paid for house.

Just to give you an idea of how freedom of speech does still exist for one group – and only for one group – I shall remind you all of a certain incident. One Baruch Goldstein walked into a mosque in Israel and shot down nearly thirty Arabs at prayer. He was praised by Jews in Israel and New York as “the sweetest Jew who ever lived”. Jews said he didn’t kill enough Arabs, actually, but “he made a good start”. Rabbis opined that “a thousand dead Arabs are not worth a live Jews fingernail”, etc. No one suggested, then or now, that any of these Zionist psychopaths should be prosecuted for “hate speech” or deprived of their employment.

But if, as I did, you make pointed comments about you know who controlling US foreign policy or suggest that that old charge of Jews having something to do with unleashing Communism on the world might have a factual basis well, you had better be independently wealthy because you have just kissed your career goodbye. I might also mention the late Marge Schott, owner of the Cincinatti Reds baseball team, who was immediately driven out of baseball when she made the unquestionably true statement that Adolf Hitler did some good in Germany before the war.

The Babylonian Talmud teaches that “he who insults a Jew slaps the face of God”. Jewish commissars of free speech operate on exactly that principle – and so do blacks, Mexicans and feminists who learned it from the tribe.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 31 Thumb down 5
john thames June 2, 2011 at 21:25

This is directly on point.

JEWISH COMMISSARS OF “FREE SPEECH”

When Oliver Stone made the comment that Hitler and Stalin needed to be put in “historical context” the Israeli billionaire and Hollywood film producer, Haim Saban, went ballistic. He was further outraged by the additional comments of Mr. Stone that Hitler did more damage to the Russians than the Jews and that Israel’s media lobby distorts the facts on the Middle East. Saban opined that henceforth Oliver Stone should be allowed to practice his Fifth Amendment rights in retirement. What Haim Saban was really saying was that Jews should be allowed to define the limits of free speech and intellectual inquiry – upon pain of career destruction.

Mr. Saban would undoubtedly argue that the First Amendment only protects citizens from government retaliation, not private retaliation. That is technically correct. However, Haim Saban must surely realize that, historically, Jews have provoked pogroms and expulsions through their anti-social behavior. Among the abuses which the Jews have committed are attempting to stifle criticism of their behavior and to suppress historical interpretations which they deem detrimental to their group interests. A good example of this process was the enormous pressure that was put on former President Jimmy Carter over the publication of his book “Palestine: Peace, Not Apartheid”. Another example was the forced resignation of Marge Schott as the owner of the Cincinnati Reds for her qualified praise of Adolf Hitler. Now Oliver Stone, himself half-Jewish, is getting the “Mel Gibson” treatment.

Haim Saban is unwittingly laying the groundwork for a rising tide of anti-Semitism. People do not care to be told what they can think and how they may express themselves. They particularly do not like to be dictated to as the price of a paycheck. Perhaps these minor considerations do not occur to the arrogant Mr. Saban. But to the man-in-the-street, certain considerations will flow through his mind. He will conclude that if one cannot criticize Jews, then Jews must be the real rulers of these United States. He will conclude that Jews are throwing their weight around and that maybe that evil man, Adolf Hitler, was on to something. He may even consider that the state of Israel is harming U.S. interests in the Middle East – and that super rich Jews like Haim Saban and their campaign contributions – are one of the reasons for U.S. support of Israel. He may even conclude that enforced silence is one of the big reasons for these abuses – and that perhaps those who enforce silence should themselves be silenced.

These are dangerous thoughts indeed – and they lead to reactions well documented in history. Oliver Stone is quite correct that Hitler and Stalin need to be discussed in context. But to raise that context would perturb Haim Saban immensely. It would raise all the forgotten historical facts that he does not want examined. To put Hitler in context would mean recalling the injustices of the Treaty of Versailles and the immense Jewish involvement in same. It would mean remembering the names of the Communist revolutionaries in Germany and Hungary after the Great War – almost all of them Jewish. It would mean remembering all the Jewish commissars who served Joseph Stalin in the 1930’s and 1940’s – before he got around to purging them. It would mean examining Joseph Stalin’s attack plans in 1941 – before Hitler beat him to the punch. No doubt the context of all these matters would even disturb Mr. Stone and some of his mistaken notions. But that is what freedom of speech and intellectual controversy is all about – rocking the boat.

It is blindingly obvious that there is a de facto Jewish approved religion of thought in these United States. This approved religion becomes ever more blatant in its efforts to crush freedom of thought and dissent. The issue is not one of bigotry and intolerance, for what is bigotry to one man is truth to another. Jewish Commissars of “free speech” like Haim Saban should no more be tolerated in these United States than the Jewish gulag commissars of 1930’s Russia should be allowed to die quietly of natural causes in their Moscow apartments.

Haim Saban must learn that “freedom of speech” does not mean the freedom to fellate Haim Saban as the price of Hollywood fame and fortune. The House Un-American Activities Committee once rooted Jewish Communists out of the movie industry. It is time to root ethnic bully boys out of Hollywood, so that both Oliver Stone and Mel Gibson, men of surely diverse viewpoints, can have their say without fear of retaliation.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 30 Thumb down 3
mgtow June 2, 2011 at 21:29

Women, being the unimaginative herd creatures that they are, are apt to trade liberty for security.

Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

You should have known that things will deteriorate to the inevitable conclusion of George Orwell’s 1984 once you have given women the vote.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 29 Thumb down 3
Rebel June 2, 2011 at 22:11

“GT66 June 2, 2011 at 19:10
Rebel, uhm yeah… shit disturber sounds about as marketable as a brown finger ribbon for prostate awareness would be. I get your idea though.”

LOL!!

I see what you mean…

I wouldn’t be thinking about a brown finger ribbon but a splintered telephone pole..(or a mast)
At that point, you don’t need to market it..you just drive it in. (easy with that sledge hammer, though).

I hope there will be lots of shit disturbers. I want to see legions of them.
(and an equal number of politicians impaled on telephone poles like hot dogs on a stick). Wasn’t it Pompei who pulled that trick?
With a slight difference: the Romans must have run out of telephone poles: they had to use crosses instead.

…. my timeline may be a bit out of sync..

-*)

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
goldenfetus June 2, 2011 at 22:38

WTF WTF WTF – I read the cat Wong article PAN posted and it references “Social Inclusion Minister Tanya Plibersek”. Can this be real? That’s only one step behind “Handicapper General”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 1
codebuster June 2, 2011 at 22:45

Women, being the unimaginative herd creatures that they are, are apt to trade liberty for security.

As morally reprehensible as it might seem to deny women the vote, let us take a closer look at this. Are women merely “apt” to trade liberty for security? Or are they absolutely predestined, as a guaranteed perk of the pussy-pass, to trade liberty for security? If the latter, then perhaps there really are moral grounds to deny women the vote. Voting and security are contradictions in terms. Voting, as an expression of will, is an expression of individualism, a statement of what the man-as-provider desires of the system that he provides for. Security is an expression of collectivism and groupthink, and it is a privilege bestowed upon the provided-for as a default condition of their pussy-pass. The provided-for** are predestined to grasp for what they can, without ever feeling the compulsion to contribute. Voting, for women, translates to “gimme gimme gimme, I want, I need, I want more of, I, me, me, I, me, me, me.”

The more I think about it, the more I come around to thinking that perhaps voting and being provided for should be mutually exclusive privileges.

Just sayin’

**So long as affirmative action remains in place, women must continue to be regarded as being provided-for… in the case of AA, provided with jobs that they’ve never had to compete for on equal terms with men.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 27 Thumb down 1
Aye Sir June 2, 2011 at 22:55

Towgunner is a marine ?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Joeb June 3, 2011 at 00:26

WF, nobody can imagine a man getting away with speaking his mind in a radical, confrontational manner.
This week 73-year-old Carey Hal Dyess spoke his mind in a radical manner, A 73 year old Man kills 6 before taking his own life .
Wf your right slavery and financial ruin could never be good for ones mental health. To speak your mind in a court room can lead to disaster. I get slavery the bills and all the debt. While she gets the house didn’t go over to well with Mr. Dyess my new personal hero.
My daughter and I were talking about this today, while I was fixing her car. She said “Dad I can’t find a man that can fix my car.
I said Baby you may never be able to find one of those . You can go to Jail for that Today.
Nice article Wf ,

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
E June 3, 2011 at 00:31

Towgunner says…
“Shoes: volumes can be written about shoes, bags and females. Bottom-line: obsession with shoes and bags is proof of female irrationality and every reason to keep the “feminine” perspective capped.”

Bath and Body Works – Candles
Over 1000 comments about a silly girl who bought candles.

There is much disagreement today as to what was the root cause for the collapse of the great ancient Roman Empire. However in the distant future there will be no disagreement as to what caused western civilization to collapse. That’s because there won’t be anything to debate amongst historians, certainly not after watching that video!

The answer is clear.
There was no external force that defeated us.
Instead we collapsed from within by becoming obsessed with “Bread and circuses”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 2
Maaldweb June 3, 2011 at 00:38

decline of masculinity= decline of civilisation and mankind.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0
Seamus the Classicist June 3, 2011 at 00:44

“Was this ever a trait of men to speak against social conventions? I think that it was far more difficult in the past to speak out against the majority(Darwin, Galileo). Social conventions are already breaking down and so is political correctness.”

I don’t know, but I do know that Greek and Roman politics were interesting when men did speak out. Usually it resulted in factious brawling, at least that is more honest than back room deals and late night legislation.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 0
evilwhitemalempire June 3, 2011 at 01:47

john thames

I’m not a conspiracy believing type myself but I DO find it quite hard to ignore all the talk of Jewish controlled banking, etc. when one considers that the U.S. supports Israel. An act which is very clearly at odds with it’s oil interests.
That Jews must control much of the government (at least foreign policy) is the only sensible conclusion I’ve been able to draw from it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 25 Thumb down 4
Eric J Schlegel June 3, 2011 at 03:06

@ Welmer, OT but I did not know where else to post this:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1393293/Rihanna-murdering-rapist-violent-new-video.html

Note how UNREPENTANT she is about her actions, whereas any man would be apologizing for the slightest infraction. Perhaps we DO need to get in touch with our feminine side? Maybe you could do an article on this.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Migu June 3, 2011 at 03:26

Use to be a man would help a strange child. Use to be a group of teens acting up, would stop when an adult called them on their shit.

Now that man goes to jail or he is shot by the ganstas. There is still a man on the street though…….

He kidnaps, rapes, robs, and kills. Doesn’t seem much safer to me, in fact it is more dangerous than ever.

Also gotta new response to “Where have all the Good Men Gone”

You aborted em bitch.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 14 Thumb down 2
Migu June 3, 2011 at 03:34

I’m not a conspiracy believing type myself but I DO find it quite hard to ignore all the talk of Jewish controlled banking, etc. when one considers that the U.S. supports Israel. An act which is very clearly at odds with it’s oil interests.
That Jews must control much of the government (at least foreign policy) is the only sensible conclusion I’ve been able to draw from it.

——————————————————————————————-

Yes, and Germans control the processed food industry with the same vigor. Brewery’s are for the WASP’s
Italians for wineries
Indians are grocers
Catholics are everywhere
So are protestants
What about the Chinese Bankers? Are they Jews in the orient?
Hey I’ve got one. OIL

Muslim’s and Russians control most of that, and I’m pretty sure they aren’t Jews. Well, Maybe some Russians.

And let us not forget the Evil Japanese Jewish bankers, they caused the Tsunami.

Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 23
Gendeau June 3, 2011 at 03:58

codebuster June 2, 2011 at 22:45
“The more I think about it, the more I come around to thinking that perhaps voting and being provided for should be mutually exclusive privileges.”

Nicely put; if you aren’t a nett contributor, you don’t get to vote on how to wast…erm spend the money.

Starship Trooper, the book and the film (not the same) got into this subject.

Military service allowed you to breed and vote (other paths must have been possible), but if you put yourself on the line, you have the right to vote.

If you look beyond the cartoon level fun (shooting and sex) then the film actually had things to say. As did the book.

Fun film, better book

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Clifton Richard June 3, 2011 at 05:31

Excellent article.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
GoldenScepter June 3, 2011 at 06:12

Guys, try not stinking up the comments so much by trying to top each other’s outrage. MRAs who have the most influence with the public are those who stay focused on the issues which matter. I really enjoy the articles published here, but some of the comments sound like a cranky, racist, geezer yelling “get off my lawn!”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 12
GoldenScepter June 3, 2011 at 06:15

This article is right on point. Feminization of society reduces liberty by taking away both high-risk and high-reward opportunities.

A mother will tend to say “just do what the man says”, but a father is more likely to say “challenge the status quo”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 4
Towgunner June 3, 2011 at 06:37

@ Aye Sir:

Yes, I am a Marine.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0
Towgunner June 3, 2011 at 07:03

RE: Voting and women.

Didn’t Tocqueville touch on the subject that the people would starve the system dry by increasingly voting themselves more and more goodies? I definitely see a huge connection between that sentiment and women. Women have voted in everything to help them, affirmative action, hate crimes, vawa, EEOC, anti-discrimination, quotas etc, to oppress, again, oppress men. Many folks are wondering where the “stimulus” (money) went to. Obviously the government, but aside from the occasional signage on the side of the expressway (American Recovery Act B/S), I’ve seen little in terms of infrastructure investment. Recall that during the depression, government projects built the Hoover dam, thousands of bridges tunnels etc. I didn’t live back then, but can assume that the investment was noticeable to common folk. Of course, today we hear about 77,000 government employees making more than governors etc, clearly one dark hole where the money is going. However, I also have also noticed a distinct uptick in ‘girl power’ media and acceleration of the bigoted narrative that men are now inferior to women. So, it leads me to conclude that stimulus money is very much being funneled into social engineering causes of which feminism has and remains to be a huge leach. Tocqueville warned that this mentality will bankrupt the treasury. How prophetic, as we are witnessing debates about debt ceilings and Moody’s holding back from the inevitable downgrade of US debt.

Again, this supports the claim that large government is behind women “winning”. At this stage government and feminism is undeniable as the sun coming up every morning, and in that light we can see that the opposite is actually true – women aren’t winning at anything. They just happen to be an effective voting block the same way senior citizens are. Women are, at any given time, ~ 50% of the population, and have one distinct advantage when it comes to voting power – solidarity. And as painful as that is, that is a fluke of democracy not a validation of superiority and certainly not a justification for them to be “taking over”. Indeed, our constitutional republic was designed to prevent mod rule or the majority dominating minorities. Men, will be wise to see this and form their own solidarity, which I think will be nothing less than beautiful in the noblest sense of the word. But, if nothing else, as we conclude that our country is bankrupt and make necessary cuts, we should cheer and support this, because it will be dismantling the femocracy.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 1
Maaldweb June 3, 2011 at 07:10

@evilwhitemalempire

The jewish banking elite (which btw has funded feminism among other destructive ideologies) is still considered a “conspiracy theory”.

On the other hand, the control the israeli lobby has over the US foreign police in the middle east has been accepted by several academics as a fact beyond doubt.
Always have in mind that academics (at least the majority of them) are spineless and mostly leftists (actually leftists are spineless by nature but that’s a different issue).

This http://us.macmillan.com/theisraellobbyandusforeignpolicy is an excellent study on the subject which raised hell when it was firstly presented. Not because it said something new but because the people who did it hold positions in major US universities (Columbia and Harvard) and were widely known and respected for their works.
One of the main themes of the study is that interest lobbies are “as american as the apple pie”, the authors just worry that this particular lobby goes too far sometimes and that could be damaging for US and Israel…

An excellent presentation of the jewish mentality and the jewish inspired movements which affected the US and the modern world can be found in Kevin B. MacDonald’s books. Especially his Culture of Critique. Up until now none has managed to write a constructive response and to counter his arguments. They just label him an anti-semite and somehow they think that should discredit what he proposes.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 3
Anonymous age 69 June 3, 2011 at 08:13

As a new civilization becomes strong and vigorous, it is INEVITABLE that women will be given the right to vote.

After women get the right to vote, it is INEVITABLE they will dominate the political system.

After they dominate the political system it is INEVITABLE their demands for more and more benefits and protections, even protection against their own mistakes and bad decisions and immorality, will eventually destroy the civilization.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 26 Thumb down 2
Anonymous age 69 June 3, 2011 at 08:27

I realized twenty years ago that there are only two or three ways to change the incessant attack on men.

1. Violence. I tend to not like that choice very well, because violence hurts. However, the Declaration of Independence very clearly states that when all other pleas for redress have been exhausted, that is a valid choice of the people. And, I assure you, all possible pleas for redress for men have been made, correctly and legally, in the court system, as we are supposed to do. Though I do not like the violence choice, ala the man who made his political statement a few hours ago with bullets, historically that will happen when a government ignores the pleas for mercy of a group of people.

I don’t choose violence. Our government and our stupid judges (but I repeat myself) have chosen violence, because they listen to nothing else.

2. My favorite solution takes guts. Get The Hell Out. You are not a serf, owned by your government. Get the cojones to pack up and leave this horrid misandrist nation. Avoid violence; avoid slavery. Outside the Anglosphere, Nice Guys are HOT! (I am 69 years old, and I get hit on by 22 year olds.) I was on a board a few years ago, and I started a discussion of expatting as a personal solution, something to do with my life here in Mexico, heh, heh. The board shout down eventually; the owner and all the staff expatted. They had been thinking about if, and made their move, motivated by all the talk and encouragement.. The owner no longer needs meds at all, and feels great.

3. If you are one who can’t find the courage or resources to leave, avoid marriage and the other tricks used to enslave men. This is also in my opinion, better than violent resistance. We call it inpatting. Choke misandry by starving it. Legal firms push things like false DV and sex abuse charges, for strictly bottom line reasons. Like any business, they expect the bottom line to go up every year. They really don’t care how many men they drive to suicide. Probate feels are good. Sex abuse charges, even when they know they are false, which they are 85% of the time, add up quick for a busy attorney.

Don’t feed those bastards. Avoid violence. It will come, because those who enslave men have rejected all the non-violent choices. But your life will be better if you are not part of it.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 20 Thumb down 0
Quartermain June 3, 2011 at 09:21

Maaldweb mentioned to me the Eurasian father of the European Union by the name of Count Richard Nicolaus Coudenhove Kalergi.

Here is a link with some info on him:

http://balder.org/judea/Richard-Coudenhove-Kalergi-Practical-Idealism-Vienna-1925.php

A link to a recent article about the AIC’s (Assholes In Charge) Europe’s Invasion-by-Migration:

http://www.henrymakow.com/the_forces_behind_european_imm.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) June 3, 2011 at 09:43

goldenfetus June 2, 2011 at 22:38
“WTF WTF WTF …. I read the cat Wong article PAN posted and it references “Social Inclusion Minister Tanya Plibersek”. Can this be real?”

Yes…and in legislation just passed wimminz inspectors can come to your business and make sure you are hiring enough wimminz.

Not to mention that legislation passed last year allows the MISTRESS of a man to claim the same rights as his WIFE. The co-habiting requirement for ‘divorce’ was removed. This was the largest single transfer of wealth from men to women in the history of Australia. There were about 5 articles on it. ALL presenting it as ‘paybacks a bitch for a cheating husband’.

Anyone notice a pattern? Or is it all just one big co-incidence?

And why would ALL MEMBER of the federal parliament admit they were criminals by refusing to rebut the accuastion?

They are relying on men being stupid, ignorant, arrogant and apathetic.

That’s a pretty good bet in Australia today.

Towgunner June 3, 2011 at 06:37
“Yes, I am a Marine.”

Where do your marine mates hang out on the web? They might be interested in taking a look through the evidence I collected in my case…it’s no different in the US.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Peter-Andrew: Nolan(c) June 3, 2011 at 09:43

john thames June 2, 2011 at 21:25

Correct in all you say.

It took me about 10 minutes to figure out the Holocaust did not happen as advertised. Some Jews were killed. Yes. 6 Million? Not even close. The FIRST effort by Jews to claim 6 million killed in a war was in 1919. It was laughable. So they did a better PR job the second time around.

In Germany they declared it a crime to ‘deny the holocaust happened as advertised’. Then the guvment reduced the estimated number killed at Auswitzch by a million or two. The only reason it can be a crime to say something because that something is true and the guvment does not want it said.

There were also a lot of OTHER people killed in those camps such as gypsies, gays, infirm, handicapped, old. Hitler was running a US designed EUGENICS Program.

Once Hitler had given ‘eugenics’ such a bad name the american eugenics society, funded by the Rockefellers, decided they needed to ‘clean up the image’. They hired a high powered law firm to help them make the transition. Who was a senior partner at the firm? Oh, that would be a man called William Gates II. Gates and co decided to call it something kinda ‘sweet’. So they called it PLANNED PARENTHOOD. Ever heard of them?

As so his son, William Gates III ‘miraculously’ went from ‘university dropout’ to richest man in the world. Just a co-incidence, nothing to worry about. And what does Young Billy donate a few billion to? Oh. That would be PLANNED PARENTHOOD.

I could not make this up. So does anyone else here really think Billy did Microsoft by himself or do you now get that he had the Rockefellers behind him and that IBM allowed microsoft to own the desktop by making ‘mistakes’.

Once you realise that there is ‘ruling oligarchy’ you realise that this is all planned. And that ruling oligarchy is about as ‘Jewish’ and my left foot. They CALL themselves Jewish but they really worship “Lucifer the bringer of light”.

The single most important right to maintain and to defend is the right to freedom of speech. Once you allow that to be removed? You are lost. That is the message that men are well advised to throw back to the women and the ruling oligarchy. Freedom of speech is a right that will not be waived. It will be defended.

Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 19 Thumb down 2
Firepower June 3, 2011 at 12:07

Lovekraft

@ Herbal Essence:

despair not, for in your mind the truth can never be defeated. The MRM is only in it’s early stages as far as taking the battle to the enemy, and is growing each time the left lies.

Those are very nice words. Do you have any actual examples of MRM victories to share?

If you need some encouragement, I suggest going to youtube and check out some Tom Leykis

It’s ironic that you promote him: CBS censored Tom off the air for his speech – you do the same to others.

Still, I’d like to have your quick list of all MRM’s victories to share with friends who only read articles here that tell of ever increasing encroachments on our rights.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 3
Legion June 3, 2011 at 12:41

john thames June 2, 2011 at 21:25

Jimmy Carter as reference? The worst US president (well, maybe not any more) and the worst former president ever. He has verified more fraudulent elections for tyrants than any other group on the planet. He is a known anti-semite. Using him just discredits what you say.

Find another support to what you say.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 7
john thames June 3, 2011 at 13:05

Women are always claiming that it is a “man’s world”. The proof that they are lying is very simple. Here is how society was organized before “sex discrimination”.

In the 1950′s women work to support men who stay home and raise the kids. Women give it all away to men in men – take – all divorce court. The husband gets her house, her car, the furniture and all her money. He walks away with automatic custody of the kids and receives massive child support and alimony. He gets the gold mine; she gets the shaft. Only women fight and die for their country, suffering hundreds of thousands of deaths and maimings in the process. Women go down with the Titanic so that men and children can climb on the life boats. Women work themselves into heart attacks so that men can outlive women by seven years on average and inherit 80% of all the peersonal wealth in the U.S. Men have it made.

In 1963 a revoluyionary book appears on the market. It is “The Male Mystique” by Betty Schmuckstein. Schmuckstein poses as a housewife but is really a life long Jewish Communist and devotee of Joseph Stalin. Schmuckstein preaches the lie that the male suburban house husband is living in a camoflaued Auschwitz concentration camp. Men must liberate themselves from this slavery and pursue careers in addition to “men and children first”. Women tell men to shove it. All the real discrimination is in favor of men. Women are not going to give men all the jobs too. Men complain that they are paid less than women. Women reply that since men do not have to work to support the opposite sex or pay child support or alimony like women do, they should be paid less. And that is the complete refutation of male feminism.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 2
john thames June 3, 2011 at 13:13

Legion:

I believe the Republican Senator Barry Goldwater said pretty much the same things about the Zionist lobby that Carter did. Goldwater was Jewish. Goldwater didn’t like feminism any more than I do, either.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1
only known as Joshua June 3, 2011 at 14:25

Freedom of speech gives the person to speak without consequence. But unfortunately it has been stripped down.

Every man and woman has to consider the cold hard truth carefully. Uncomfortable as it is, but the truth is truth. Some people refused to accept it.

Both world wars caused massive massacres. Almost near genocides.
The Soviets starved the Ukrainian peasants.
Present time, in Sudan, people are still being driven away from their lands. Due to what’s below.

Some are driven by greed, some are driven by their dark desires.

Forgive me for this, I am going have to tread this carefully.
IN a PC world, criticism against the special classes of people, is deemed hateful. And it would be used against you. Like trying to use a shotgun to swat a fly.

I figured that I would get thumbs down for this.
In canada, if you’re white you don’t have the luxury of consideration. If you’re aboriginal first nation person, you’re considered a weed. It’s that simple.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
W.F. Price June 3, 2011 at 15:50

In 1963 a revoluyionary book appears on the market. It is “The Male Mystique” by Betty Schmuckstein. Schmuckstein poses as a housewife but is really a life long Jewish Communist and devotee of Joseph Stalin

-John Thames

Modern feminism is at least 150 years older than that. Started with British liberals. In fact, we white, Christian, Western Euros are the ones who created the environment in which it now flourishes.

Some Jewish leftists ran with it in the 20th century, but they certainly didn’t invent it.

In any event, this isn’t the proper venue — arguments about “the Jews” have a tendency to overshadow all else and that isn’t what we want here.

Joeb June 3, 2011 at 17:04

I got tattooed the other day for saying white Christians created the mess were in it will take white Christians to Get aboard and start thinking the right way.

It was the phone game in reverse , I think they label me as a foreigner .

At some point we have to swallow are pride and say how can we fix this . And faith without works is futile . Their is a lot of work to be done . who’s going to roll there sleeves up a give the good fight .

In these times ; all lip service aside . Someone will be going to Jail for their political views on this subject. Will we at that time stand behind are hero or will we cower like dogs in the face of are master. ?????

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2
john thames June 3, 2011 at 18:08

I would agree with Mr.Price that feminism, as a disease, existed before Jewish leftists decided to revive it in the early 1960′s. I believe that is factually correct. However, I do insist that the revived feminism of the 1960′s was largely a Jewish creation. It is indeed ironic that one of the leading male feminists of mid-Victorian England, John Stuart Mill, was also a rather blatant antiSemite. He disliked the Jews rejection of “divine” Christianity and abhored their “eye for an eye” Old Testamentary mentality.

Yes, certainly, it will not do to blame it all on the Jews. Nevertheless, the Jewish component in promting all this class warfare between the sexes is remarkable.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 13 Thumb down 2
john thames June 3, 2011 at 18:56

Mr. Price makes a good point when he says that it is unfair to “blame it all on the Jews”. In politics and society, things rarely change all because of one group or influence. The United States did not get into WW2 solely because of Jewish pressure; as Charles Lindberg correctly pointed out, the domestic considerations of the Roosevelt administration and the gigantic British interest in “getting us in” also played major parts.

Nevertheless, to treat feminism as a problem unto itself, rather than as part of a more general assault on western civilization of which feminism is only a component, is to seriously misrepresent what is actually going on. There is a consistent Jewish thread running through all the things that are tearing down the United States. This includes racial equality, open borders for non-white immigration, attacking the Islamic world for Israel’s sole benefit and, of course, feminism. Other factors are undeniably involved. One is the desire of business to tear down the old “family wage” system, where they had to pay a man sufficient income to support a wife and family. Now corporations can pay two people less than they had to pay one. Another major factor is the desire of hypocritical females to abolish male privilee in the business office while retaining female privilege everywhere else.

But the common denominator running through all these things is, provably, the Jewish angle. Mr. Price began this thread by denouncing male lack of candor in society because of feminist bullying. I think it wrong to complain of lack of candor and then object to candor on Jews – particularly if Jewish power is seriously drving the subject under discussion – the feminist assault on men. This is, of course, Mr. Price’s web site and he alone controls what appears on it. I’ve had my say – for which I thank Mr. Price and all contributors.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 2
Robert K June 3, 2011 at 19:33

“There will always be those of us who will break the mold and speak our minds anyway”

I am constantly amazed at how many “men” have caved in to crap like political correctness. Men shouild say what they think and back it up. This is one of the hallmarks of masculinity. I was taught this by my father (and my mother, too). They could see how feminazi-ism was screwing the world and they wanted to make sure I would be a better man than most of the gutless wonders walking about. I have always said my mind on any subject without regard to my audience – anyone who is offended by my views can fuck off. More than once, I have heard a woman say, “My husband would never say that”. My reply: “Then your husband is not a man”. To me, being the man I was brought up to be is more important than being the man society (read: women) want me to be. I live my life according to the values I have been brought up with and I believe in. I will never change. It doesn’t matter what the vagina-owners and their mangina-boys say, I will never cave.

More men need to say a big, “FUCK YOU” to all supporters of PC, feminazis and manginas.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 1
Attila June 3, 2011 at 20:19

Most women LOVE to be in a “hive” or in horizontal-style organizations – probably because they lack a sense of transcendence and verticality. It’s almost impossible to get them to “go beyond” themselves- perhaps because they “feel” they can’t connect with it “personally”.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Antiphon June 3, 2011 at 20:59

john thames & Welmer:

You both touch on different parts of the truth. Welmer is right that feminism is a creation of western men (that they were Christian is debatable). Locke argues strongly against paternal authority and the indissolubility of marriage in his Second Treatise on Government.

Feminism is the application of Liberalism in the realm of the sexes. Liberalism is the overthrow of all authority that proceeds from something (or really Someone) outside of man. Liberalism has been understood as the overthrow of altar and throne, i.e. the destruction of the power of kings and of the Catholic Church.

And what group has benefited enormously from Liberalism? You guessed it, the Jews. They went from being a disenfranchised but tolerated class in the kingdoms of Europe to the highest positions in society from which they had been excluded by law.

Is it any wonder that they have promoted Liberalism and its spawn (Marxism, socialism, feminism, unrestricted immigration, etc.) over the last couple of centuries? Jewish financial backing has given these movements a great deal of their success. And much of the intellectual input has been Jewish. As has the media assistance these movements have received.

Let’s not forget that Jews were taking up the cudgels for feminism long before Betty Friedan–Emma Goldman was a Jewess.

Welmer might not like the implications of these observations, but Mr. thames is spot on. These are not mere theories, but are provable and have been proven–perhaps not in the New York Times (I wonder why…). If men are going to be free and speak their minds, then they cannot be hobbled by fraudulent charges of anti-semitism just because they describe what they see.

The fight against feminism is merely one front in the larger war against Liberalism. You can’t kill the Hydra by cutting off its individual heads.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 3
Legion June 3, 2011 at 21:44

john thames June 3, 2011 at 13:13

I’ll take Goldwater as a reference. Still to me, Carter is entirely discredited due to everything he did.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
john thames June 3, 2011 at 21:59

Legion:

Aside from his position on Zionism, Carter is anathema to me too. As to politicians opposed to Zionism,you might read the works of the head of the California State UnAmerivcan Activities Committe, State Senator Jack B. Tenney.

I thank Antiphon for agreeing with my general assessment.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
goldenfetus June 3, 2011 at 22:41

I think the question is simple: if there were no Jews would we be facing this situation now? Would feminism, socialism, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism, gay acceptance, racial integration, etc all be powerful and bent on the destruction of White males and Western civ?

I think the answer is even more simple.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 2
Poester99 June 4, 2011 at 10:39

American men are being molded into being cowards, fighting their battles in female style passive aggresiveness and back stabbing because of the dire consequences of opposing the well armed establishment.

Women are wondering where all the good men have gone. They have been beaten into submission by the increasingly powerful and all encompassing machinery of the state.

Those that would resist are being, at best, marginalized, and at worst incarcerated and “eliminated”. This leads to compliant genes becoming more and more the norm. I think that young female hypergamy and preference for thugs and assholes opposes this trend but is not enough to reverse it at least in the US.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1
DevilDog June 4, 2011 at 13:35

LOL @ Political Correctness

You need to realize one thing, the Men and Women who support political correctness, are all a bunch of spineless chumps.

I was talkin to my buddies and a few of their buddies the other day, and we get into controversial topics and start speaking our mind, cussing, insulting, spitting, smoking, like Marines do. Until one pog says in a friendly manner “Ahh DevilDog that’s wrong man”, I respond “What’s so motherfuking wrong about it bro?”, he stumbles on his words “It’s not politically correct.”, I respond, “Fuck political correctness, and fuck you if you support it.”, he stood there silently for the rest of the conversation.

I wasn’t appalled by his spineless cowardice as much as I was at how the hell this chump got into the Marine Corps, they let anyone in these days.

People who support political correctness are cowards who are quick to back down, be aggressive and attack them constantly. Overpower them with your logic and destroy their foolish beliefs.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Antiphon June 5, 2011 at 18:46

DevilDog:

Good advice on dealing with the politically correct. I do, however, have a question for you. It is not meant pointedly. It is a serious question that puzzles me.

I take it from your words above that you are a Marine. I applaud your individual commitment to oppose political correctness and your critical attitude toward feminism. How then do you reconcile yourself to fighting to impose it on other peoples?

Much of the propaganda surrounding the present wars in the Near East has been the Mahometan disdain for women: they have to wear veils, they are stoned for committing adultery, they cannot vote, etc. Perhaps this was just a smokescreen to get feminists on the bandwagon for war. But it stands to reason that we, i.e. America, will be imposing Liberalism and feminism on these nations.

I doubt that Saddam’s Iraq was big on equality of the sexes. There were surely few women politicians, judges, generals, soldiers, doctors, professors, etc. I would assume that as a Liberal governmental system is imposed on the country–if indeed such a thing is possible–this will be expected. The same goes for Libya and Iran, when we finally get around to making war on the latter.

I do not question your bravery or patriotism. I just wonder how you fight to spread the errors of our system onto other nations. Or do you think of what our political leaders are doing in different terms than those above?

Another question, if you’ll permit it. It appears to me that one of the biggest subscribers to political correctness, esp. sexual, in our day is the armed forces. We are always told about our “brave men and women in uniform”. What is your view from the inside on this point? Are the Marines better insulated in this regard?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
economics9698 June 5, 2011 at 19:49

Look at my blog.

http://usa-wethepeople.com/

No politial correctness there. Men just need to tell the PC crowd to fuck off and go to hell. Give them a middle finger or just tell them to their face to fuck off. Be a fucking man or shut the fuck up.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Advoc8 June 5, 2011 at 23:23

Peter-Andrew Nolan:

“Notice the mans sentence is more than 10x the womans sentence despite the fact the woman was FULLY COMPLIANT in the crime.” (In ref to the Jaycee Dugard case)

If you also followed the case in Utah (Elizabeth Smart Kidnappers), notice that the women got a less harsh sentence for help in being committed to a mental institution (yes, she WAS mentally ill). But the man who was in fact more mentally ill. His family, including a brother AND sister who are psychologists, tried for years before the kidnapping to get him help. Yet, neither NAMI nor the Utah Domestic Violence Coalition would recognise him as mentally ill, nor would their court or hangers-on.

Life in hard-time prison for him. He will end up dead. she will get out early, with much compassion for her mental illness. Yes, more of the ever encroaching police state to “protect” us all with their KKKangaroo KKKourts.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
GW December 26, 2011 at 16:26

Well, distract and rally – that’s a possible solution. However, this is not a right century for freewheeling Natty Bumpos Leatherstocks types to rule. No place for a creative violence, either…. ‘cept you enlist to the Army. No more wood hacking, no more deer hunting… What me a man to do? Play videogames (imaginary, virtual reality that is, sitting in my chair… waiting ’til my wifie sends me out to do some chores or just out of her way – you see, she’s ‘xpecing some girlfriends). Heck yeah! But don’t forget to deliver your paycheck in time, or you’re a goner! Lol.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Tom September 3, 2012 at 11:59

Patriarchy is an academic ideal type with its critique of capitalism and masculinity, variables of pay gap and so-called “glass ceilings.” This article captures it: patriarchy is not the domination of women by men. Instead it is through evolution the liberation of women by men. The characteristic or liberating quality of men that has done so is masculinity.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 4 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: