Hillary Clinton made a surprise showing at the TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) Women conference to affirm her dedication to empowering women worldwide, saying “where girls and women flourish, our values flourish.” She also noted that it was appropriate that there was a TED Women’s conference, but not one exclusively dedicated to men.
Saying “women’s equality … is a security issue,” Mrs. Clinton clearly implied that resistance to feminism is a threat to national security, perhaps laying the groundwork for an intervention in a country deemed hostile to feminism. She went on to explain that women’s issues are comprehensively integrated into the “three key elements” of defense, diplomacy and development.
In an interesting development, she told the crowd that she was laying the groundwork for an international, mobile prosecution unit used to target men, which she plans to debut in Africa.
Watch video below:
Although Mrs. Clinton doesn’t mention who will carry out her plans, it is all but certain that the boots on the ground will be filled by young men.
{ 84 comments… read them below or add one }
Hillary is barely more than a party hack, piggy-backing on her husband’s success (as so many women politicians have done). She is a relic from another age, though, and her time is almost up. Even she recently said that after this stint as Secretary of State, her career in “public service” will be at an end.
She has been ineffectual, even for the cause of feminism, because she has nothing of substance to offer. I remember when she became senator of NY, one of her only actions during the first couple years of her term was to introduce a bill calling for a 9/11 commemorative stamp. Yeah, that’s an adequate response to terrorism.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
48 
3
I think I understand Bill better now.
If that old shrew was my wife, I’d also be so desperate that I’d also hit on fat chicks like Monica Lewinsky.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
84 
1
Several of the people I follow on Twitter have been Tweeting glowingly about TED Women. Its sickening. It’s been so, so difficult for me to not respond with fire and brimstone. But my Twitter account is under my real name and find-able by potential employers so caution must take precedence over valor in this case.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
46 
1
Wow, Hitlary seems like the woman who most hates men in the entire world. And we made her head of State.
Notice how the middle east now has nukes on her watch? Notice how the world hates the US? Notice how now the terrorists are causing havok in our country and we are no longer free to fly on aircraft in this country without extensive and intrusive body searches?
This is her job as head of State.
Here job is not being the Ambassodor from NOW to the world.
But that what she really is.
The women, I mean democrats, I mean, women, will fight to have her run against Obama because of speeches like this.
I wouldn’t count her out anytime soon.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
38 
4
” Mrs. Clinton clearly implied that resistance to feminism is a threat to national security..”
Really?
Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.”
—Toward a Feminist Theory of the State,
Catharine A. MacKinnon, 1989, First Harvard University Press Page 10.
While I was growing up, these things ( Socialism, and Communism) were considered as threats by the U.S. Government. N.O.W. they consider these as safe and ok? MEN died to prevent these things from invadind the U.S. Of America. I already know it IS /WAS considered “politically correct” and “normal” today for to arrest and imprison MEN for violating federal law for subversion AGAINST The U.S. Government AND The Citizens/People of The United States of America The affore mentioned crime of feminism is treason yet they (feminists) do NOT suffer any penalties. N.O.W. WE THE MEN SEE WHO THEY TRUELY FAVOR AND WHITE KNIGHT TOO.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
32 
4
invadind should be invading
Like or Dislike:
3 
3
I’m being persecuted by corrupt divorce attorneys and a feminist judge. Does anyone have any ideas on what I can do to strike back against the attorneys. (it is probably impossible to fight against the judge). I want to make sure they lose money persecuting me and destroying my life.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
36 
4
No Gentlemen, I am NOT surprised that the U.S. Guberment has been highjacked by such malicious and violent a thing as feminist.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
24 
1
Please post here as I am afraid to leave my real email anywhere. I want to make sure that these slimeballs don’t make any money wrecking my life. Maybe they will go away if they can’t make any money.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18 
3
http://fathersforlife.org/hist/feminism-is-communism1.htm
Like or Dislike:
11 
1
Escaped,
Run like hell. If you can get a passport and leave, do it. I’m very sorry, but you are probably going to get screwed.
I’d love to say ‘stay and fight’, but unless you have a damn good lawyer, expatriation is your best option.
Hopefully you’re either wealthy enough to afford a proficient defense, or you have a lucrative skill where you can jump ship.
I wish you the best
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
39 
0
The equality mask has three actual definitions being used:
A. Congruency
B. Separate but equal
C. Supremacy
The disingenuous assertion of feminism is that they pretend to strive for A but actually are aiming for C. We need to call them out on this.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
37 
0
@escaped:
Try this for a start:
http://www.dumpyourwifenow.com/2007/08/25/brutal-divorce-tactics-just-for-men-edition-released/
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
23 
0
@ Rebel, nice. That’s what I used. It’s divorce is war on a smaller scale but just a vicious.
Like or Dislike:
14 
0
Here’s some good news. All our troubles may be optional any day.
http://www.chxa.com/a/scientist-created-mice-with-two-fathers/
Like or Dislike:
13 
1
It’s getting to the point I get upset every time some woman utters the word “equality”. Do they still need to pretend they are fighting for women’s rights, and not privileges and supremacy over men? I hate it when my intelligence is insulted.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
53 
0
Rebel.
That site is blocked in the country where I live.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19 
0
It’s just sickening. How many more NEW government agencies will be created to combat this “problem”? All paid almost exclusively by men, no less.
The USA was a power to be reckoned with as early as 40 years ago. Today, it’s still a global super power but has lost a lot of it’s luster. Interestingly, during that same period, women have become more and more “liberated”, including advancing past men when it comes to attaining educational supremacy (in numbers, anyway), while men have become nothing more than walking ATM machines for every entity but themselves.
Is THIS the national security and economic advancement other nations will look forward to with Hillary’s ideology?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
27 
0
@ Robert, not banne in the US, yet.
My thought is that Hitlary’s policies make the US less safe as we get more involved in a culture war with the rest of the world.
How would you feel if the USSR was coming into the US and giving employees cell phones to rat on their employers? An act of war? That’s what I would think.
I’m curious on your take Robert, given where you live, do you think this creates more animosity from other countries as we get more and more involved in destabilizing their indigenous cultures?
Like or Dislike:
15 
1
You notice that this plan is being deployed in Sub Saharan Africa, where outside of South Africa, there is no real major military force to speak of: just gangs of armed thugs of various sizes (And yes, I am including the Congolese and Sudanese armies in those descriptions). They wouldn’t dare deploy this in Iran, or China, or even Eastern Europe, because then they would actually have to fight people who could fight back.
Also, I wish someone would have asked the softball question “if women drive economies so well, is that why we just got done suffering a Great Recession while India and Patriarchial China with a million more MEN than women are on our heels and poised to become the no 1 economy in the world?”
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
32 
0
I do not know what has happened with TED talks lately. Take a look at some of the current headlines and descriptions:
TEDTalks : Kiran Bedi: A police chief with a difference – Kiran Bedi (2010)Kiran Bedi has a surprising resume. Before becoming Director General of the Indian Police Service, she managed one of the country’s toughest prisons — and used a new focus on prevention and education to turn it into a center of learning and meditation. She shares her thoughts on visionary leadership at TEDWomen.
TEDTalks : Tony Porter: A call to men – Tony Porter (2010)At TEDWomen, Tony Porter makes a call to men everywhere: Don’t “act like a man.” Telling powerful stories from his own life, he shows how this mentality, drummed into so many men and boys, can lead men to disrespect, mistreat and abuse women and each other. His solution: Break free of the “man box.”
TEDTalks : Halla Tomasdottir: A feminine response to Iceland’s financial crash – Halla Tomasdottir (2010)Financier Halla Tomasdottir helped rescue Iceland’s financial system after the crash — by applying 5 traditionally “feminine” values to financial risk. At TEDWomen, she talks about these values and how to balance them.
These are not cherry picked, they are the top three in my RSS feed. Since I’ve gone through the trouble of listing them, I might as well give my feedback based on the titles and descriptions:
1) A police chief’s primary ambition, in my opinion, should be to reduce the number of criminals in society, not strive to feminize the prison systems. This goes to show that there is some strong belief that masculinity is evil and that by “educating” these barbarians in the graceful ways of acting more like a woman will somehow make them better men in society when they are released.
2)Tony Porter is telling men not to act like men… but he is telling this to women. Look at his target audience, TEDWomen. He is obviously trying to get a pat on the head and a dog biscut, not really trying to help the men who are casualties of this gender war.
3)Feminine values to any kind of risk, including financial, is an oxymoron and a paradox.
I have not watched any of these videos because they would simply do nothing but incite anger in me. If any of you have a high tolerance to vomiting, maybe you could watch them and enlighten the rest of us on these “ideas worth sharing” and the evident destruction it will lead us to. Welmer?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
36 
0
Robert in Arabia December 13, 2010 at 12:51
Rebel.
That site is blocked in the country where I live.
Depending of the type of block you have, you can use a site like
anonymouse.org, where you write the address of the site you want read. If it is blocked too, Google for “anonymous web surfing”.
Or you can change the DNS in your system, Google “free dns servers”, with results like http://theos.in/windows-xp/free-fast-public-dns-server-list/.
You can use proxy servers too, but I never used them so I can not give advice on them.
Like or Dislike:
10 
0
At this point Hillary and the New World Feminist Order is at an end. One of the above posters hit the nail on the head when they noticed these femi-communist are limited to exporting their ideology to Africa. The rest of the world now has seen what happens when a society embraces feminism and they are having none of it.
We have a long way to go yet and it may become violent before it’s over but feminism has been stopped cold on it’s global march because they have left nothing but barren landscape behind them. There is no real money left to fund their campaign just like Obummers hopes for a civilian “Army” the feminist SS troops have no funding and the the incoming repubs are gonna be too afraid to spend money on stuff like that.
I wouldn’t say the tide has turned but the fight is getting started in earnest now.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
2
@Singledad:
“Notice how the middle east now has nukes on her watch? Notice how the world hates the US? Notice how now the terrorists are causing havok in our country and we are no longer free to fly on aircraft in this country without extensive and intrusive body searches?”
First, I do not think that the world hates the U.S. that much.
Envy? Perhaps, but not hate.
The whole thing has been inflated beyond proportion.
And for “terrorists”, I am not even sure they exist.
If you remember, terrorism began with Palestinians hijacking airplanes to draw the world’s attention upon their misery and slavery in the hands of Israel. And then they put a few little “bombettes” in Paris for a while.
The news media has climaxed this as a world threat! My ass!
And for the nukes: they are in the hands of the Isrealis: funny how nobody saw that as a threat…
We are been flooded with propaganda, much like the good old USSR.
One thing I noticed here: as soon as the general population starts to disbelieve the “claims” that we are surrounded with terrorist, the police, quite obligingly find a “nest” of such, who hold the objective of destroying entire cities.. I do not believe what those fear mongers are saying: they just want you to be and to stay an obedient drone who trembles at the sound of the famed word “terror”.
Hot debate. What do you think?
17 
10
I wonder how seriously she believes in what she’s speaking.
She looks more like an opportunist to me.
Like or Dislike:
13 
0
Here are some excerpts from the TED Facebook page article below.
Stephanie Fiems: When all you egocentric men can give birth to babies then you have the right to exclusivity.
Patti Campbell: The jig is up men – you’ve made a mess of this world for long enough. Empowered women need men “like a fish needs a bicycle (U2).” That should scare the crap out of you.
Phil Swift: Have to ban religion first, males invented religion to opress women
I’m trying to hold my own against the filthy feminist pigs and manginas but there are so many of them.
Yesterday at 11:21am · Like
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
42 
1
http://www.goproxing.com
What I use when mah Goverments blocks Blogger. Usually for a week, then is circunvented.
Like or Dislike:
7 
1
LOL.
Why is Hitlery trying to appeal to so many women’s libbies?
Maybe she is hoping to get laid!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
1
@ Rebel
I agree, certainly the recent “terrorist” arrests in the US for people set up by our government are simply useful idiots. I fear men here could be targeted as could anyone going through life changing stress in their life.
But what I’m talking about is Hillary’s performance. I have many european friends I talk to daily. They hate the US, from a political point of view. They don’t hatte Americans as individuals, but as a country they find us imperial, ignorant, with little understanding of right and wrong and big on bullying.
More bullying from Hitlary forcing their wives to fear and hate their husbands will not engratiate us to the world, IMO.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19 
1
Note her very Mao-ist clothing and color.
“We must move the agenda of women and girls forward.”
“We must widen the circle of opportunity for women and girls.”
She’s sees, “the power of women and girls as agents of change in the world.”
All the feminist platitudes and more.
Remember “It Takes a Village”, because fathers aren’t necessary.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
31 
1
At least they used to feign interest in the well-being of all children, regardless of gender, as the saying was always “woman and children…….blah blah blah” Now they don’t even feign interest in the well-being of boys anymore, now it’s just “women and girls…….blah blah blah”.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
27 
5
OMG Africa!!!! Dont we have enough problems already.
To paraphase Kevin Rudd, These rat fuckers are going to fuck us!!!!
Hot debate. What do you think?
18 
6
Facebook comment:
Except when men create Facebook so you could make that comment.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
58 
0
@ Robert in Arabia:
Try using Ixquick instead of Google.
Try “extreme divorce tactics for men” + dvd
Now, if you live in Arabia,… you might not need this: would you?
(curious)
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
If Feminism is necessary for global security, than anti-feminists will be rounded up and treated as enemies of the state.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
28 
0
Hilldog should be seen by all of us as a running joke by now. She has blown any credibility when she took her cheating husband back, thus exposing the power-hungry attitude of the modern empowered woman.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18 
0
@Singledad:
“but as a country they find us imperial, ignorant, with little understanding of right and wrong and big on bullying.”
We agree. It’s the politics. And politics go much in the direction an empire assumes. I think all empires have that in common. It was like that in Rome, Athens, Egypt..
Now the flip side:
Take cinema and see what movies are played everywhere, what music is played, what culture spreads like wildfire.
What actors appear on almost all screens?
One can say this is the other side of the coin.
-)
Like or Dislike:
4 
2
I think Bill doesn’t dump Hitlary because he gets laid more being married to her than if he were divorced.
Ahh, women, that’s the way they are.
Like or Dislike:
14 
1
@ Rebel
As propagandists we are just as good as Goebelles. But the leaders of other countries see propaganda for what it is.
They will not give up their way of life for our “harem” mentality.
Maybe the free love decade was designed to seduce a generation of young American men. Older men would have been much harder to seduce.
Maybe this seduction of the baby boom generation is to blame for our predicament.
And, I suppose it is possible to conquer other countries simply through cultural imperialism, which is what Hollywood does, but, hopefully, other countries will learn from our mistakes and not eat the feminist fruit.
I certainly hope so. Our country is such a mess I fear a fix is not possible. I hold hope because there are still places on earth where men are not hated.
Hitlary and her henchwomen are working hard to “fix” the entire world.
Like or Dislike:
6 
1
“mobile prosecution unit used to target men”
and
“the boots on the ground will be filled by young men”
Men have always and will always be the ‘target’ and cannon fodder of society, daddy conspiracy, mommy conspiracy or not.
“plans to debut in Africa”
Super power picks on a nation that cant fight back.
Situation normal.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
16 
0
“where girls and women flourish, our values flourish.”
Values, ha….what values?
It is scary calling resistance to feminism a security issue. That just gives permission for Big Sis to come in and shut down antifeminist blogs under the excuse of “national security”.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
36 
2
– Uh-0h.
That means more men:
-losing their children through the feminine whims of separation/divorce
-forfeiting their wealth to finance state-enforced alienated children
-experiencing massive incarcerations for: DV & CS default (or whatever)
-unemployed by bogus Affrimative Action/Employment Equity programs
-being tax slaves to fund programs that outright excludes them
-homeless
-maligned
(Need I go on?)
Nice values, huh?
Whose values are Hillary claiming as “ours”? Who is she speaking for? Are these ‘feminist’ or female or commie/elite globalist values? She speaks to all but where is she really coming from and who is she really addressing?
To those living outside the ‘Western’ world:
This cultural imperialism is, regrettably, coming your way. It’s not just Hillary Clinton pushing this. It’s difficult to estimate the numbers of those who are in lock-step with her and who or what she represents. But, there are more of us.
It’s no better in Canada, where I live. It may even be worse as Canada is an after-thought and barely noticed on the world stage. For years, many certain Parliamentarians here have adhered to United Nations General Assembly Agreement inspired policies. In all appearances, the citizens don’t recognize that the source and inspiration for some passed laws originates from outside the borders of their own nation: an un-elected supra-government agency whispering in the ears of naive or ladder climbing politicians. These measures may soon be coming to a town near you.
Us individual men in N.America, literally and figuratively, had little to do with what you see and, are not your enemies. A lot of this stuff went on while many were at work, supporting their families, the next generation.
‘Feminism’ is a wound for a much larger entity – world government. And like previous ‘Towers of Babel’, is doomed to failure. Spirit of Jezebel, your time draws near.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
0
Hillary Clinton: The Dems homely Palin.
Like or Dislike:
8 
6
The Oprah Winfrey circus has come to Australia, and Oprah is putting on a shindig at the Oprah House (renamed in her honor – previously recognized as the Opera House).
I’ve got a theory that the Oprah Circus might be part of a deliberate strategy at dumbing America. Is this possible? Can America be dumbed down even more than it already is? The answer is YES. Australian culture is the epitomy of blind, unquestioning obedience that never questions authority. I’ve already made reference in posts months ago about the nanny-state laws that are routinely ushered in with zero resistance from the populace.
Think about it. A brilliant political strategist in the US would look to Australia and think, “hmmm… what can we do to make Americans as obedient as those fun-loving Aussies?” The answer? Get Americans to think more like Aussies. You know, that dumb-friendly, collectivist, cheering group-think hooked on “fun”. This is what Oprah Winfrey is doing even as we speak. She is, in effect, dumbing America like it’s never been dumbed before. If it is part of a deliberate strategy, then it is indeed very clever, and success is almost assured. Dumbing America is integral to feminism’s sweeping success.
Injecting Australian dumb-think into the veins of the media is much more effective than injecting a mind-control drug into every American’s arm.
I envisage an opening scene with sequined, dancing koala bears and kangaroos on bicycles parading around on stage. I believe we can expect Hugh Jackman to fly in on a flying-fox.
I think I’m going to throw up.
Like or Dislike:
13 
0
@ Tom 47 said,
“Here’s some good news. All our troubles may be optional any day. http://www.chxa.com/a/scientist-created-mice-with-two-father ”
I see this appoach as the only real effective way to counter feministic thought. Through male provoked tactics as this approach implies, a total subversion of the legal system for all the right reasons, would ensue like wildfire. The abundant positives would outway all the negatives. The shock to feminist law, world wide would be uncalculatable.
My fingers are still crossed in reference to the completion of a male-scrotal-fetal carriage, artifical wombs, animal-human surrogates, or which ever combo that may be required.
Like most things male oriented, it will take a gay male or a black male to do it numerious times first…make it fesible, and popular without any social risk, and then of course…the white male populace will cowardly belly up to the table and par take in the new approach, hence re-envigorating male dominated family values.
Women control most men thru the males self-disempowering mindset of getting laid over everything else…including his own future good.
Its sad really.
Until sexually-self disiplined males who don’t think, act, or behave like this are are given opportunity to be displayed positvely on the internet or Utube,etc. I fear little will change.
I don’t believe MRA politics or anything else short of violence or artifical reproduction for males will have any effect on feminist-legalisms .
As to the traditional approaches and effect(s) the MRM would and has had on feminism, might be summed up, porportionatly speaking , simlar to a nats ass… verses a hurricane.
There needs to be a tangible, crediable, physical, threat to a womens monopoly on the giving and taking of human life, at whim.
Life begats politics…
not the otherway round.
For those who rock the craddle of life…
control the rest of life.
And as to being a traditional father, this is not scientifically suffient enough to counter a womens ability abort or artifical inseminate,
without a male involvment.
Men now have little or no say at all in the up bringing of the new and upcoming society thru the rearing of kids as future adults, because of feminist hollywood, schools and courts.
Single Dad households are the only way to circumnavigate and equalize the feminist political-monster-and its 2 ugly stepsisters, …the family courts, and abortion clinics.
Equal must be equal ( not legally “mean”equal,…
but … actually “be”…equal.. in ALL abilities.
for balance to actually occur.
Its simple…
No wombmen..
No crime….
Kids kept.
Laws abandond
Men regain legal footing
Like or Dislike:
6 
2
Some random thoughts . . .
- Hillary always wore the balls in the Clintoon white house. It was pretty sad to watch at the time.
- @escaped: all I can say is that if I had known when I was where you are at what I know now things might very well have turned out differently. If I were to give you my honest advice, Welmer would probably have to spike my comment as a violation of the commenting policy. I will say, however, that in a criminal trial at least you get a jury which is far better than your prospects in family court.
- @singledad: “Wow, Hitlary seems like the woman who most hates men in the entire world. And we made her head of State.” It would be interesting to hear Vince Foster’s take on that thought . . .
- @Herbal: “If Feminism is necessary for global security, than anti-feminists will be rounded up and treated as enemies of the state.” Yep, and before you do that wholesale you have to have a few ‘test cases’ to try out the meme. Julian Assange comes to mind . . .
It is unfortunate, when I first discovered TED I enjoyed many of the presentations, but just this weekend I ran across the Tony Porter talk and was sadly disappointed to see a man demean himself in such a manner before a bobble-head female audience.
Like or Dislike:
9 
0
Guys,
Those of you who use Google Reader start pressing the ‘Like’ button on Spearhead posts. It will help put them into Google Reader’s Recommended Items, which will likely bring in lots of new traffic, getting the word to men who wouldn’t have heard it otherwise.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
0
OT
Jilted bride sues ex for 100k http://au.news.yahoo.com/latest/a/-/latest/8505494/jilted-bride-sues-ex-fiance
ROFLMAO
Like or Dislike:
0 
5
She somehow reminds me of Hitler.. I read some memoirs about how one women accidently listened to Hitlers speech before he became a dictator in some german pub and that his speech and voice almost made her throw up. Well Hillary almost made me throw up and I would if i would continue to listen but I stopped before video went halfway.
Only one thing comes to my mind when I hear this … future concentration camps for man. But I guess american prisons already start transforming in concentration camps for men who are betrayed by wifes.
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
Look at this embarrassment! How does such a mindless twitter account get 90,000 followers… Notice who the twitter account belongs to – a budding young Christian white knight named Shawn. Somebody – presumably his alienated and maligned father – forgot to tell him that the bitches, not the ill-treated men, are the ones in need of a lesson in respect and maturity.
Check it out but get ready to vomit and lose all hope:
http://twitter.com/treatwomenright
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
SingleDad December 13, 2010 at 13:01
@ Robert, not banne in the US, yet.
“My thought is that Hitlary’s policies make the US less safe as we get more involved in a culture war with the rest of the world.
How would you feel if the USSR was coming into the US and giving employees cell phones to rat on their employers? An act of war? That’s what I would think.”
Who do the employees work for? Imho, if the employers own/manage businesses that manufacture and/or handle classified material/materiel and the employees are being used to extract informaition for blackmailing purposes, I would consider it an act of spying or espionage.
“I’m curious on your take Robert, given where you live, do you think this creates more animosity from other countries as we get more and more involved in destabilizing their indigenous cultures?”
That’s a good question. Of course I would be intersted in hearing what answer(s) one of our diplomats would give in response but, my take is; meddling in the affairs of other nations can do more harm than good if the helper(s) don’t know what needs to be fixed. If it isn’t broke, don’t try to fix it. If it is broke, make sure you know what must be done to fix it and, consider the result(s) if the fix(es) don’t work.
1.We may be helping to correct some problems while replacing them with other problems.
2. We may only think we are helping when we are actually creating new problems or making exisiting problems worse.
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
Seeing as feminists and their ilk , and those who listen to them, do not understand cause and effect, their “fixes” result in problems/damage(s) in one form or another.
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
oh I can already see how this backfires if it runs out of money. Also imagine deploying this in a war zone and the units themselves functioning less than “gallantly” in the field.
Its bound to turn on itself at a certain point I presume.
Like or Dislike:
8 
0
OT;
Editorial: Is feminism about justice and humanity, or just about women?
Submitted by anthony on Mon, 2010-12-13 21:21.
Article here. Excerpt:
‘Unless feminism is not about justice and humanity. If feminism is about women, however, then the condition of men is irrelevant.
If far more men have suffered economic hardship in the recession, there should be rejoicing that they are returning to work. It ought not be an occasion to suggest that sexism is coming into play so the goal of having women as secondary citizens is affected. Men are not trying to “snag” a woman’s job. Men are simply trying to find work, any work, including work that had been done formerly by another man.
Today, “A Doll’s House” would need rewriting. Nora might put it this way: “Before everything else, I’m a woman. I want women to gain power notwithstanding the real conditions of the world. It is only women who concern me. Men may be human, too. I’m not sure.”’.
http://news.mensactivism.org/node/16064
http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101213/EDITORIAL/12130338
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
OT;
New Yahoo Group: Male Positive Media
Submitted by mens_issues on Mon, 2010-12-13 01:06.
Male Positive Media is a place for those who are interested in viewing or ordering various media (TV, video, music, movies, books, articles and art) that portray men and boys in a positive light. Members are encouraged to submit their own examples of male-positive media for others to enjoy.
With the excess of negative portrayals of males in the mainstream media (MSM), this group is a much-needed refuge for those who would like a more upbeat representation of males.
Please keep submissions on topic and refrain from posting media that represents males in a negative stereotypical manner as those coming here will want to avoid such portrayals..
http://news.mensactivism.org/node/16061
http://dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/MalePositiveMedia/
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
fainslep: I only know Kiran Bedi from a documentary, but the aim of the meditation experiment, apart from personal growth, was to reduce violence and corruption in a hellhole prison.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/05/27/DDGSBCUNKV1.DTL
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
If the US tries to force feminism on other countries, there will be widespread resentment, and our reputation will go down the shitter. People will basically see us as imperialists (which I guess is fine for the liberals as long as it’s pushing feminism?)
I’m very anti-jingoistic, and anti-mindless patriotism. Pushing feminism on others is mindless patriotism of another sort. It’s just no good and won’t end well, not the least because the US’s power to influence other countries’ cultures is waning as the overall power of the US wanes.
Hillary’s intents are quite clear in her TED talk. She doesn’t even try to hide it anymore — anyone opposing feminism and unrestrained female license is basically a terrorist who needs to be routed out and silenced. By a largely male gestapo, of course.
It will be interesting if the next phase of unsuccessful hegemonic invasions to finance the military industrial complex is justified solely in the name of womens’ rights. Then we’ll know for sure that the US has become a feminist form of China.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18 
0
And yes, Hillary is a sort of Goebbels for feminism and NOW. Bitter, unhappy old woman, taking it out on the men of America and the world. Trying to turn Africa into even more of a matriarchal shit hole than it is now.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19 
0
Back then, had Hillary won the Dem primary and then went on to win the presidential election to become the new US president, things may have been a lot worse.
Too bad Obama, being the whipped and castrated mangina he is, rolled over and made Hillary his SoS.
Like or Dislike:
13 
1
Off topic, but perhaps welmer could cover this in his next article?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1338479/YouTube-video-Sudan-shows-woman-flogged-laughing-policemen.html
The above link shows a woman being flogged in a Muslim country. Look at the comments. People (being sheep) wrongly assume just women are punished under sharia law (or whatever system they run over there). They completely miss the point that both men and women are punished for crimes, and by punished, it seems ‘flogged’ is a better term.
Why is it when women are held to the same standards/punishments as men, we only hear about THEIR plight?
And why is when only men are punished (eg: being on the frontline in Iraq), it’s men AND women on the battlefield?
Hopefully a new article analyzing this would be useful, eh?
Like or Dislike:
11 
0
Since we are talking politics, remember bachelors have been elected and served as president.
Garfield was elected a bachelor, and Buchanan remained one.
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
Clevland not Garfield. I always mix those two up
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
Please take note that for a man who has already made his decision to live his own way, none of this shit carries any significance.
Additionally, if men refuse to be the beasts of burdens they have always been, the entire onus will fall upon women’s shoulders.
And in such a case, who would still claim that men are getting a rotten deal? For instance, I would envision garbage collectors, firemen, police, etc.. to go on strike and demand huge increases in salary, so they can work only half time and enjoy themselves.
If I was a doctor, I would work only on Sundays (graveyard shift) because it gets triple time. Then, working every second Sunday would provide an excellent life for a single man. Women would have to “fill the gaps”.
If women are the ones to finance their own utopia, then men are freed from such duties.
This could be a nice and easy way to turn things around, meaning that women would be, from that time on, the only ones responsible for the good functioning of society: they would become the new Atlas.
(that includes going to war)
And why not?
Why should men support the system?
Life is too short to waste it in useless activities and disputes. Since women are more than willing to pull their weight (and hopefully our weight as well), to raise their kids by themselves and suffer the heart diseases that was always the realm of men, men as a whole would certainly enjoy an easier, cosier life. There are always two sides to a coin…
We can try and fight feminism until hell freezes over to no avail. Now, since this condition seems to have been set as permanent, why not turn things around and make them work to our advantage?
There must be many ways that men can benefit from feminism that no one had envisaged at the onset.
In other words, rather than fighting feminism, is there a way we can bend it in a way that essentially benefits us men?
Food for thoughts.
Above all: Carpe Diem!
Like or Dislike:
13 
2
I could not watch the whole thing. Hillary is beyond insane/evil.
women’s rights a cornerstone of foreign policy?twilight zone stuff.
I tried and failed miserably to understand how women “rights” in other nations affects American National security.
Help collect evidence of crimes against women in The Congo and transmit through cell phones? “WTF” to the power of infinity.
The #%$#%$#%^ Rockefeller Foundation is involved? As far as I’m concerned, this confirms any and all conspiracy theories about them.
Oh, if I had a Tommy gun……….
Like or Dislike:
8 
0
Silent,
Thanks for the advice. That’s what I’m thinking as well. There’s no hope in staying as they keep taking any money I can get for a lawyer and awarding it to my ex.
Like or Dislike:
5 
0
escaped, Best Of Luck,Man.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
Here is a casus belli for Mrs Clinton. This video showing a 16yo teenage girl being whipped in Sudan for wearing a skirt too short apparently is being discussed by french liberal newspapers.
Like or Dislike:
1 
1
Dear All:
Thanks for your comments.
Dear anontexas:
As per the flogging of the Sudanese woman, I noticed that the flogging was more procedural than substantive.
In Canada, flogging of males (and not females) was the law as per the Criminal Code of Canada (CCC). A feminist short-clip propaganda organization, “Historica” developed a 30-second informercial (really, a femomercial) about the first female member of the House of Commons of Canada (elected in 1921), Agnes McPhail. She pressed for and obtained various reforms of our institutions of secure custody but in the propaganda video, she was depicted touring a male prison where males were abused (and flogged).
She used a whip of sorts to hit her desk in the H of C to bring MPs’ attention to the, “evil” of whipping. She was depicted as a successful reformer. The feminist organization covered up that entirely of the whipping was violence against men (and boys) and that the elimination of flogging had not taken place until the 1970s.
In my book, I write about the evidence of the above (and more) and point out that the hitting of the male by various means was the, “rule of thumb” of violence against men (of course the feminist, “rule of thumb” of violence against woman is a proven lie–also evidenced.
In the case of male flogging, the men and boys who were flogged were attended by physicians with the purpose of reviving them in the case that they passed out (so that the pain of flogging could be maximum). Male flogging was not procedural: it was substantive. And what is more, “kidney belts” were applied to the one whipped so that the kidneys would not break open from repeated blows.
Hillory’s enhancement of globalization of criminala negligence to protect men, boys and male babies is utterly criminal. The laws and legal instruments used to advance her plan of female supremacy point to further enhancement of the Feminist Nuremberg Laws.
Her global attack against the male race constitute government-funded, designed and administered Domestic Violence in which she uses her political broom as her instrument of DV. She is as per the claims about Senator McCarthy and anti-Communism of the 1950s (Anne Coulter showed that much of the cliams brought against McCarthy were utterly false–a good read is her book, Slander). But in the case of the Femi-Communism of Hillary, all claims against her are true and getting worse.
One can anticipate that the Congress will establish a Feminist HUAC Committee (or, better state, yet another Feminist one). The new-wave House Committee on UnAmerican Activities could be described as the House Committee on Un-Feminist Activities and Hillary is aiming to make a clean sweep against the anti-pinkos (Masculinists, the intelligence, the hearted, the civilized, etc.).
The USA should change its name to the, “Feminist States of America,” (FSA for short) and its citizens should be called, “Feminists.” As such, properly, one could describe the armed forces as the FS Army, FS Air Force, FS Navy and the FSMC (and the FS Coast Guard).
The lower house of the Congress could be entitled the, “House of Feminists” and the Senate could be entitled the, “House of Ladies” (the British H of Lords–a masculine term feminized). The President could be called the Matriarach and the electorate the Matriarchy. The flag would no longer be red, white and blue, but rather, pink, white and blue. As such, the FSA would show its true colors (but, on second thought, the colors would have to be cleanzed and, as such, would have to be, “pink, white and nonblue). The National Holidaya could no longer be the 4th of July (named after the man, Julius Ceasar) but rather would have to be in the gender-corrected month of Julianne and, as such the National Holiday would be on the 4th of Julienne.
The Founding Fathers would be out, of course, and would be replaced with the Founding Mothers (the spouses of American Founding Nonmothers would have to do, I suppose). The national drink would be breast milk (but, curiously such would have to come from a Feminist who didn’t murder all of her babies in the womb).
And, of course, the UN would have to come out in its true description, the United Feminists (UF), and the flag thereof would have to be pink instead of that offensive blue and the globalized police force thereof would have to wear the pink berets (and not those offensive blue ones). And all the hate, lies, incompetence, parasitism, etc. without end would and should be known for its gender-correct substance, not BS, but rather Cow S (CS for short).
Let’s lead the Feminists in programs of perception equity in which things are labeled as per their substance.
Great discussion, thanks to all, once again.
Like or Dislike:
9 
0
And you know the sad thing gender foreigner, even if everything in there actually happened, women would STILL be electing men into the presidency just so they would have a man to blame everything on.
Like or Dislike:
6 
0
Latest TEDTalks video from RSS feed:
TEDTalks : Hanna Rosin: New data on the rise of women – Hanna Rosin (2010)Hanna Rosin reviews startling new data that shows women actually surpassing men in several important measures, such as college graduation rates. Do these trends, both US-centric and global, signal the “end of men”? Probably not — but they point toward an important societal shift worth deep discussion.
It is apparent that TEDTalks has evidently been castrated. The last 4 vidoes have been nothing but misandric feminist propaganda, and I am officially removing their feed from my list. If anyone can find me an e-mail address I would sorely like to send them a message detailing my disgust in the blatant misandry and sexism they have been currently following.
Notice in the description how it addresses the “end of men” with a “probably not”, i.e. even if all men were to die horribly tommorow it should not concern anyone, but since it probably will not happen lets talk about the achievement of women at the expense of men like it is something new.
I can’t help but feel like the state of this feminist movement is narrowing towards a focal point, a deciding point, an ending point. Something needs to happen before something happens.
Like or Dislike:
8 
0
I didn’t watch the video of the woman being flogged (it had already been flagged, requiring a login), but it looked from the thumbnail that she was being flogged over her clothes. A poster above mentioned the flogging of male inmates in Canada. These brutal beatings were not administered over clothes, adding an element of humiliation and enhanced cruelty to the proceedings.
Right now, in countries like Singapore, men (but not women) accused of certain crimes are tied naked to wooden frames after being stripped naked and viciously whipped on the buttocks. The fact that women cannot face this sentence legally, but can become prosecutors who can sentence only men to this sexually sadistic, bloody, humiliating ritual should surely be enough to draw the attention of a feminist like Hillary who is supposedly interested in “equality” and “social justice”? Why isn’t Hillary, and the rest of the equality obsessed and gender-specific-violence obsessed feminist community up in arms and campagning against such an outrage? It seems far, far more severe than this Middle Eastern woman’s beating.
And given that most of us (probably all of us here on this site) know how often innocent men, or men guilty of relatively minor crimes, are wrongfully and perversely condemned to the hellish depredations of the “justice system”, shouldn’t this qualify as a humanitarian crisis? Where’s the special task squad to go in, overturn the established government (barbaric or not), and liberate the victims of the heinous gender crime?
No dice, eh? Not so much as a whisper. I’m sure we’re all shocked.
(Credit given where credit is due: The Canadian woman who fought against the prison floggings deserves to be commended, I’d say. Probably a far finer specimen, as some of us remember our grandmothers, than the pathetic, obnoxious and hypocritical feminist rabble of today.)
Like or Dislike:
4 
0
The only people ever allow to talk at TED are Illuminati Shills. Period. That includes Julian Assange.
Like or Dislike:
4 
1
Kiran Bedi is a radical feminist.When asked about her opinion on feminism portraying all men as criminals,she said “it’s true because 98% of criminals are men”.
Like or Dislike:
7 
0
It is sickening that feminists rattled their sabers over the woman getting flogged when they advocate and demand things far worse be done to men and boys. They advocate and demand much worse for men and boys who are simply accused of committing a crime, even if there is no evidence to prove a crime occured.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
Feminists say; “the law is the law. If you break the law, take the punishment.
If this woman broke the law, shouldn’t she take the punishment? True jutice shows no favoritism.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
Don´t flee to China, India, Brazil and others increasing in wealth. As we have seen their liberal process is only starting and it´s going to get really bad. Folks stay in the USA. Why? With the coming economic collapse and death of the dollar the USA will not have welfare to support their experiment, the brainwashing colleges are going bankrupt and reneweal will occur sometime in the future. No more relativism, affirmative action, multiculturalism/diversity, equality and things alike. No more excesses and hysteria over “It´s my civil rights/human right/minority right to do what I WANT since you are *insert bigot, racist, sexist, xenophobic, etc* but ANYWAYS you will have to PAY”. They know their time is almost up. In the next 5 to 10 years they will either reform or emigrate. I´m already seeing this happening.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/011461.html
Nope the economic collapse was not caused by the boogeyman of “greedy bankers”. It
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
“of defense, diplomacy and development. ”
And who the fuck is going to do the defending again? Does this mean we are going to start drafting women or does she simply expect men to die for a random woman?
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
Dear Sick&Tired:
As a followup to your welcome commentary, I would add that in the research I’ve done for the book I’m writing, I established by way of exhaustive reading of original documents that yet another Feminist lie can be exposed systematically.
As per corporal punishment, it is true that males were made naked from the buttocks up to the middle back so as to receive their stripes. In review of such, the female privilege of exemption from corporal punishment was reviewed by a Canadian Parliamentary Committee entitled the, “House of Commons and Senate Joint Committee on Corporal and Capital Punishment and Lotteries.”
It was a follow up to the following string of developments.
1. The Mother Country (The United Kingdom) had a Royal Commission on Corporal and Capital Punishment during the 1930s and was about to administer its recommendations.
2. World War II intervened and the matter was set aside until the aftermath of WWII and the new Labour Government administered its particulars which included the elimination of corporal punishment.
3. The Crown Colonies’ Criminal Law had been amended mechanically by way of spillover legislation from the Westminster Parliament and, as such, Newfoundland was the first jurisdiction in British North America to have a legal ban on corporal punishment.
4. Newfoundland joined Canada in the late 1940s and, as such, corporal punishment against males was reinstituted in that jurisdiction whereas it remained unabated in the rest of Canada.
5. The Dominions around the world took the UK’s lead and the move to reform was brought about world-wide by way of the fluidity of political culture (Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc.)
6. As such, Canada had a Royal Commission similar to that of the UK and the whole matter of corporal and capital punishment was deferred by the Commission to Parliament (i.e., it chickened out).
7. Parliament chickened out and established a Committee.
8. The Committee held hearings for years and established the recommendation that corporal punishment should not be eliminated for males and neither should it be created for females. The reason given was because females are sex objects (not exactly the term used though), they should not be made naked for flogging.
As such, being a, “sex object” was a measured advantage for the female and not being considered to be a , “sex object” was a measured disadvantage for the male.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Mobile presecution units? call them for what they really are; The new Einsatzgruppen.
Like or Dislike:
3 
0
[quote="Andy"]Mobile presecution units? call them for what they really are; The new Einsatzgruppen.[/quote]
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Thanks for that informative post, gender foreigner. I’m glad there are people like you doing research like this because I don’t think I could stomach it a lot of the time — so disheartening. Sadly, the behaviour of the Parliament and the decision of their committee does not come as a shock to me.
It’s great to hear that you’re in the process of exposing feminist lies, though. How can we stay abreast of your forthcoming book?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Dear Sick&Tired:
Thanks for your encouragement. Keeping abreast of my forthcoming book would involve keeping in touch with Spearhead. I’ve been working on the book part time since 6 December, 1999 when I heard yet another CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation–Canada’s national Pravda of Feminism–a Crown Corporation–aka, government, aka, Feminist corporation) about the 1989 murder of 14 women (and one male suicide) at Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal.
All the usual stereotypical hate and incompetence characterized the program.
Originally, I began to write politicians, with no responses whatsoever. So, with the work I had done, I began to make a more thorough work of it and it’s been my obsession ever since.
I’ve read over 900 000 pages of selected evidence. I keep a weekly schedule of my book work (1 h/day when I substitute teach and 8h/d when I am not working Monday-Friday).
The truth is ugly but being informed of how to counter Feminist lies and incompetence can have benefit. Also, I have developed a theory of interest accommodation which is fact/evidence-based. Perhaps, this is the book’s major contribution.
Also, I’ve invented other ideas such as that of a Coat of Medicine (modeled on Canada’s Coat of Arms). Notice that the state has ALWAYS been a synonym for armed service (until recently–once it became safe, THEN women wanted the vote).
In Canada, the two largest parts of the state as measured by money spent and number of employees are: 1) Medicare (6.6% GDP) and Education (6.6% GDP). Both have over 80% female employees and most of both are consumed by females. Both are ideologically femocentric. No surprises there.
I’ve read works and commentaties of/by Sir Winston Churchill. One quote I use relates to his reference to his writing (WWI and WWII were both occasions for him to write a series of about 5 books for each). In reference to such, he referred to how writing (I’m paraphrasing) started as a mistress and then ended up as a tyrant which was eventually sent out to the wolves for discernment/criticism.
I KNOW what he meant.
The insider information I have being in the Feminist Social Government Schools and elsewhere is quite informative for me and, in part, has been foudnational to my writing various requests as per Access to Information.
Being in (Politically Correct) Canada, I can tell you that the A to I Act is intentionally flawed (of course). In Canada, there are historically about 5 layers of government: local (municipal, city, county, regional municipality, etc.); regional (territorial and provincial), colonial/dominion (“Canada”) and as per the Westminster Parliament, Imperial.
The A to I Act does not cover Imperial evidence. Fortunately, in my continuing quest, I found a book written by a man who spent many hours/months/years researching original documents in the UK as per Imperial doings. On gender matters, his exact-referenced evidence is quite telling (including the Mounties covering up women’s lies in the press and their conspiring with them to cover up their lies as per violence against men–in one case a woman from the Times of London actually wrote an article about an execution of a man in the Yukon during the Gold Rush BEFORE the hanging had actually had taken place–and then it was not administered ont he planned day). In that case, Sir Sam Steele intercepted the Royal Mail and took out the lying letter she had sent for publication.
Also, in oppositoin to the university snobery which can be so rampent in vested-industry (read: government) industries such as teaching, claims about Pavlov’s dog salivating upon hearing a bell ring, etc. are actually false, variously).
With a practical world view, Sir Sam Steele of the Northwest Mounted Police (later made Royal as the RCMP), had to tame horses which were quite wild. Also, he had to ensure that they would remain under control while officers discharged their rifles and/or side arms (if you’ve ever gone hunting, perhaps you’ve had the experience of seeing a debutant hunting dog visibly shaken at the sound of a shotgun being discharged–upscale that to a horse).
What he did was discharge rifles each time the horses were fed so that they were used to associating firearms discharging with something they wanted, food. As a side effect, the horses salivated upon guns being fired. This was ahead of Pavlov (if I remember correctly–I have to double-check the dates). Community-college types are often much ahead of university types as they are geated to reality instead of adherence to ideology of state, aka, Feminism.
Anyway, I’ll keep you informed along with others, from time to time. Thanks for reading my outtings of Feminist lies and gender truths–there are more to come of the same type for which I already have amassed evidence.
Sincerely,
Gender Foreigner.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Oh Hillary, on your deathbed, when you have had time to reflect upon your true nature and your actions, will you be able to raise your head in welcome to the next stage? Or will you continue to be bitter and curse those who come after?
This is a rhetorical question, as we all know that feminists don’t believe in a higher power – like all anti-religious socialists, they only crave power, and she has ensured her misery will be spread for decades after her passing.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Delusional Misogynist
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
{ 2 trackbacks }