This article was originally posted, in a slightly different form, at In Mala Fide on December 4, 2010.
A reader emailed me to tell me that Julian Assange’s second rape accuser is named Sofia Wilén. She’s the “Woman B” in this article, the stalkerish groupie who slept with Assange but got mad at him after he turned out to be an inattentive geek. There are a bunch of articles confirming Wilén’s involvement in the case, including her friendship with Assange’s other accuser, the psychotic feminist Anna Ardin:
STOCKHOLM/MELBOURNE (Rixstep) — The charges against Julian Assange were indeed trumped up. Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilén planned it all. They went to the police station asking for advice, knowing the police would turn it into an accusation of rape. They’re also the ones who leaked the story to the tabloid Expressen.
This was revealed in a letter written by Assange’s Australian barrister to the website Crikey.
A bit of a recap first.
Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilén approached the Klara police station in Stockholm on the afternoon of Friday 20 August 2010 to ask questions of the police, purportedly about forcing someone to submit to STD/HIV tests.
The policemen on duty rang up prosecutor on duty Maria Kjellstrand even before the formal interrogation had begun. Kjellstrand - working with no paperwork at all at this point – issued an ‘APB’ for Assange and had the police search the Stureplan district of Stockholm for Assange, ostensibly to bring him in for questioning (and a tour of Swedish isolation cells).
The formal interrogation of Sofia Wilén was only concluded hours later and the interrogation of Anna Ardin didn’t take place until the day after - by telephone.
As seen from Anna Ardin’s SMS history, Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilén made the whole thing up - and even decided to leak the story to notorious Swedish tabloid Expressen. The story reached Niklas Svensson and others at Expressen at 19:52.
A colleague of Svensson’s rang up Maria Kjellstrand to find out if the story was true - and Kjellstrand, violating the rules of her office, told the reporter that it was.
Wilén is apparently a photographer by trade. Here are some pictures of her:
This one I found thanks to Legion, at Unfrozen Caveman’s blog:
Here’s another from Advocatus Diaboli:
I ask you to spread the word – Julian Assange’s lying rape accusers are Anna Ardin and Sofia Wilén. These women need to be exposed for what they have done. Link to my posts and/or any others you please in blog comment sections, forums, Digg, Reddit, StumbleUpon and the like. Tweet them, Facebook them, email them to your friends. If you have a blog, write your own post on the situation. Bloggers and forumites are welcome to re-publish any and all of my original posts on the debacle in their entirety (aside from this one, you can find them here and here) provided they follow these rules:
1) Attribute the post(s) to me, since I was the one who wrote it/them.
2) Don’t modify the post(s) from its/their original form in any way.
3) Provide a link back to the original post(s).
If you need pictures of Wilén, Advocatus Diaboli has posted another one to his blog. Pictures of Ardin can be found in abundance on Google Images.
Good luck, and thank you for all your help.
_______________________________________________________
Ferdinand Bardamu blogs at In Mala Fide. Follow him on Twitter here and friend him on Facebook here.
{ 46 comments… read them below or add one }
I’d give ‘em both 6s.
Like or Dislike:
10 
7
I might get flamed for this, but here goes:
Have Arden and Wilen actually claimed that Assange raped them?
Does anyone know whether or not Assange did anything that is an illegal sex crime, rightly or wrongly, in Sweden?
What exactly does the international (Interpol) warrant charge (or whatever the proper legal term is) Assange with doing?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
1
Assange is being directly affected by feminism and should be focusing entirely on feminist related issues.
Unless he directs 100% of his energy into exposing false rape accusations and the feminist/totalitarian nature of government, then no one here should feel even the slightest pity for him.
That is all.
Like or Dislike:
1 
12
Embeded-Prosecutor Maria Kjellstrand is as much a dangerous person of interest to the mens rights community, especially Swedish men whom may have been officially subjected to her violations, political agenda and misfeasance for many years.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
40 
2
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
2 
50
Anti, see these links.
http://falserapesociety.blogspot.com/2010/12/rape-charges-against-wikileaks-assange.html
http://www.georgewashington2.blogspot.com/2010/12/sex-charges-and-arrest-warrant-against.html
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
0
But, to see Assange, compared with his appearance, both are still several levels up out of his league…were he not a suddenly famous man.
Hot debate. What do you think?
22 
31
Let’s put out a bounty for dirt on these two women especially very high partner count.
We should put it all out all over the web.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
48 
4
That’s actually a pretty good idea.
A wikileak sort of job.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
27 
2
Anyone know Swedish? The real dirt won’t be found in English, regardless of how much the Scandinavians use it.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
0
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
8 
60
How sad for the lamestream media that the blogosphere has to do their independent investigative work for them.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
41 
1
He managed to make Liberal Media look like disengaged cheerleaders only interested in furthering their agenda by avoiding the obvious harm to Their Great Man.
Then, he managed to make BOTH Hilary and King Barack look like duplicitous incompetents at the same time.
No easy task, when considering Time, NYT, CNN, MSNBC, ABC and everybody else would jump on a grenade for him.
Remember: it is not just Muslims who are our enemy. It’s also not just government. It’s also not just Illegals. It is not just ONE enemy, but a host of enemies – plural – that ally against us.
Imagine a Wild West movie. You don’t want to boldly stride into the street to draw with the gang of badmen – just to get shot by the Backshooter you missed by the corral.
Finding out Saudi Arabia funds Al-Queda and RED China ships North Korea’s nuclear wares to Iran is as important to any cowboy as the ex-wife’s vile divorce attorney.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
38 
8
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
4 
47
@Trunx
Because feminism is a symptom, a convenient ally for a corrupt government that is long in the tooth. Attack the symptom and it may well reincarnate in another form – kill the disease and you may never see it again. Or more concisely – kill the government that supports feminism and you kill feminism along with a whole host of other maladies.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
40 
8
What exactly does the international (Interpol) warrant charge (or whatever the proper legal term is) Assange with doing?
As far as I know they just want to question him which is why a warrant is so absurd. In the US no one has to submit to any police questioning and the only reason that people do (with a lawyer present if they’re smart) is to clear their name as a suspect usually by giving an alibi. Charging a person after this and the alibi checks out could result in a lawsuit for malicious prosecution but the person really doesn’t ever have to answer police questions. If the DA believes there’s a case then she can charge the person but most of the time the case hinges on what the defendant said to the cops which is why you should never say anything to the cops at all. You have nothing to gain by talking to cops.
From what I can see they have something called “sex by surprise” and I have no idea what this means in Sweden. The term may have actually had some legal meaning akin to rape but feminism and female prosecutors have so twisted the original meaning that today these statutes are meaningless.
“Stalking” is a good example of a statute used to harass mostly men. Before the mid 90′s I never even heard of anyone being charged with this and then there was an explosion of stalking cases. The real legal definition of stalking is something to the effect that a person is basically shadowing the movements of another person with the intent to kill or cause severe bodily injury sort of like a hunter stalking an animal and when he sees an opportunity shoots it. Many men have been charged with stalking merely for asking a female to go out with them even though the elements of the statute as well as Intent could never be proved in court. It was basically being used by females to use the cops to dispose of inconvenient men (betas, omegas etc) because even though the charges couldn’t stick the guy might be so scared that he’d plead guilty to something minor like disorderly conduct thereby precluding his chance of suing for damages since he did plead guilty to something. The whole thing really comes down to the Police state and females perverting the law to control male behaviour for things which are not even crimes. I can only hope that the economy gets so bad that cops and other government workers have to be laid off and that they simply don’t have the manpower to harass men.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19 
3
I’d give ‘em both 6s
Put your glasses on. The one on the left looks like a man. An ugly man.
Hot debate. What do you think?
19 
8
From where I’m sitting, the highest profile false rape accusation going on right now is that of Julian Assange. That’s exposure in anyone’s language, even if the form isn’t that familiar. I can’t think of a similar case in which the corruption of of the complainants and the collusion of law was so blatant that the MSM can’t even bring itself to smear Assange with its usual anti-rapist gusto. The Duke boys and Hofstra guys were pronounced completely guilty as soon as the media got their names and photos – but this time, not so fast.
Assange is making history with FRAs as well as crooked government.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
27 
2
3dShooter, you said:
“Because feminism is a symptom, a convenient ally for a corrupt government that is long in the tooth. Attack the symptom and it may well reincarnate in another form – kill the disease and you may never see it again. Or more concisely – kill the government that supports feminism and you kill feminism along with a whole host of other maladies.”
Feminism is a disease actually. One of many in fact. There are multiple diseases out there:
The golbal warming scam, feminist policies and the so called ‘war on terror’ to name but a few.
All these diseases need vaccines (aka the truth) and unless you tackle each one individually, they will always find a way back in, no matter how ‘libertarian’ you THINK a given new government will be.
Hot debate. What do you think?
17 
3
piercedhead commented:
“From where I’m sitting, the highest profile false rape accusation going on right now is that of Julian Assange.”
Then he should be using this time to fully expose the false rape allegations that are widespread in modern society, and the feminazis whose corrupt policies enable such bs in our western legal systems.
As I see it, he’ll not say much, just like the forgotten Duke guys, and instead of actually making this issue more widespread (as it deserves to be) it’ll just end up being swept under the carpet. And if anyone thinks that’s an achievement, they’re deluded as well as stupid.
Like or Dislike:
6 
6
It’s amazing that just looking into the story a bit more makes it clear that there’s no rape involved. Well, not at least as we or any reasonable person understand it.
From the article:
OK, so the condom broke. How could he have busted the condom deliberately? Chewed on the end of it to weaken it before rolling it on? Gotten out a sewing kit and popping a few holes in it? And that’s assuming that sabotaging a birth control measure qualifies as a rape. In which case, the millions of women who “forgot” to take their birth control pills qualify as rapists!
On to woman B:
Ok, so the idea here is that the woman insists the man wears a condom the night before. They go to bed, he apparently wore one, but not when they had sex the next day. Notice he’s not forcing her to have sex, or anything like that. Where is her accountability? If he didn’t wear a condom the next morning, then she could have asked him to stop. Now, if the next morning, she wakes up to the dude doing her without a condom, or with one for that matter, she has a case. Similarly, if they start going at it but she says to wear a condom, but then he doesn’t have one on, and then she says to stop, and he continues regardless, well then again she may have a case. But if she’s doing him willingly without a condom, then that shows clearly she’s changed her mind about last night’s insistence he wear a condom.
It’s unreal, isn’t it? And the media just keep going along with it.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
24 
1
His case is slowly growing into a world scandal- that’s enough for us at the moment i think.
Let the facts speak for themselves.
Like or Dislike:
13 
1
heh, maybe I should check to see whether the latest Wikileak has anything to say about Skadi…
That would be pretty funny.
You know I will check it, don’t you, Skadi? That kind of thing used to be my job, after all.
I’m chuckling as I think about how amusing the reports on you would be.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
20 
3
@hmmokay
That’s why I’m an anarchist with libertarian leanings – I don’t think that government, a monopoly of coercion and force can ever be properly constrained and thus it is to be avoided.
Like or Dislike:
4 
4
I’m actually a little surprised at how obvious this is. The guy could’ve been accused at any time in the last 20 years but it just happens to come at the same time that he’s pissing off a bunch of super important people. The alleged crime occurred very recently too. It’s too ridiculous for words. the fembots appear to be doing their best to demonstrate how easy it is to accuse anyone of rape. It’s wierd to me.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
27 
0
Avenger, that was a man
Like or Dislike:
5 
1
This is the place to go, if you are interested in the Assange case.
https://www.flashback.org/t1275257
You have to wait for a couple of days to get registered and most of the writing is in Swedish, but you are allowed to write in English and people will answer you in English.
Like or Dislike:
2 
2
My question is simple. These women committed perjury by making false allegations which should have been given no credence at all unless made under oath.
I am not holding my breath. This will be, for tens of millions of men, one more piece of evidence that women are liars and hypocrites in the main in the west. If it were a MAN making false allegations of WOMEN the WOMEN would be screaming about it.
Pphhhfffftttttt. Women spew hatred at me in abundance? Well? Let’s see 12 women put these two women on trial.
Hot debate. What do you think?
15 
6
escaped man posited…
What an interesting notion.
I seem to recall that when a certain golfer was in strife for abusing his clubs that numerous sundry, former paramours materialised seemingly out of nowhere.
Now I’ve been brought up with the notion that a gentleman never tells and I’ve pretty much lived up to that. But I get seriously annoyed at womens’ propensity to blab intimate details especially when it’s done for profit.
Might wake a few of them up to the old sauces, geese thingy.
Like or Dislike:
7 
4
I would add that should any said paramours blab the question of condom usage becomes paramount. Always sort the glove situation out first.
Like or Dislike:
3 
1
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
3 
26
I posted a brief ditty on my blog…
Like or Dislike:
2 
4
1) Buyer’s regret from consensual sex is not rape. The police or court must throw out this kind of case immediately, without batting an eyelid.
2) Women who wish to accuse some guy of rape must not be ‘protected’ by the media with their identities withheld. What’s wrong, don’t wish to let your future husband know that you’re damaged goods? This will help drastically in reducing false rape claims.
3) And if you can’t report a rape fast enough for meaningful forensic tests to be done… too bad for you lady. No taxpayer money should be used for investigating claims of being raped last week at a party, or being raped as a child by a stepfather. Let bygones be bygones, and let the police do real work.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
10
I’m going to try and reserve depracatory comments toward both those Swedish chicks accusing Julian Assange of rape until their guilt is publicly revealed within a “court of law”. Otherwise, and my apologies to those calling for their heads, I might be falsely accusing chicks who might not be false accusers. We have to remember their innocence before guilt.
If or when those two agents of Machiavellian social division (feminists) are outed as false accusers I shall unleash a torrent of deserving choice vile verbiage to excoriate them to their bitter rotten cores. Then advocate for the furtherance of treatment that would put a smile on old Uncle Joe’s face. Any punishment less than what a man would receive wouldn’t be true ‘equality’, now would it girls?
Thanks to FB for both articles on the Swedish chicks. This is a true public service – identifying possible false accusers, with one allegedly having ‘revenge’ fantasies. Females are well known for both privately and publicly agitating others for their own individual benefit. Let us see if these two in particular can individually weather the trouble routinely foisted upon others.
Now, if the mrm (and the fra) could obtain Wiki-leaked info of areas of importance to men’s concerns. For two examples of a long list, the names of people responsible for formulating and allowing the continual open social/legal assault upon men and boys, and why this social engineering ever came to existance. Then, think Uncle Joe again.
Like or Dislike:
10 
1
Thanks for those links, Ulysses. After viewing them, it seems it’s not clear if there was ever a charge of rape against Assange. Instead, it seems a prosecutor started looking into it and was pretty quickly told to drop it because there was no basis for a rape charge. The whole thing stinks of a trumped up basis for a head hunt against Assange, but I wouldn’t call Wilen or Ardin false rape accusers. They may well be gaming the misandrist system, in fact it seems they are, but it doesn’t seem to me that they’ve accused Assange of rape, falsely or rightly.
@Avenger
I’m not sure if you’re saying Wilen or Ardin looks like an ugly man.
Like or Dislike:
3 
2
universe: Since very little points to the women having been victim of anything grave and they must have known how much damage their accusations must come to infer on Assange, I think they have acted immorally, even if what they say is true. Look at prosecutor Finnés reasons for dropping the sex crime case.
Like or Dislike:
6 
3
@Universe
That’s pretty much my take. I don’t necessarily need a revelation in a court of law, having little to no respect for such courts, but I’d need more evidence of false rape accusations before accusing the two women of making such false accusations.
Like or Dislike:
5 
1
Dear All:
Once again, a good discussion. I hope that Assange does not bow to the diverting strategy of what is apparently just another possible case of false accusation, which is possibly the favorite instrument of women’s violence against men. Don’t take the bait, Assange. And, apparently, he isn’t. Good for him.
It would be a great thing if we had a Wikileaks about all the false accusations of women (and girls) and gainst men (and/or boys). Particular names, institutions, dates, findings, facts, etc. should be made clear. It would be great if Wikileaks dealt with government, union, United Nations’ etc. criminal negligence to protect men, boys and male babies. The list of gender crimes is endless.
Persons of divested interest (at end of career, end of life, etc.) would be prime actors in such leaks. Perhaps, as was the case of, “Deep Throat” (a man who was passed over for promotion–the one who spilled the beans as per the Watergate Affair in the USA during the 1970s), Feminists who had been affronted by other Feminists in parasitic, gender-criminal organizations as per promotions, junkets, etc. could be pursued and the whole idea could be promoted routinely in the mainstream media and elsewhere in order to encourage such leaks.
One could call them, “Femileaks.” Divide and conquer. No prisoners. The ones who leak could be called Blood Letters and the ones who try to get them to shut up could be called Tampons. This could be an opportunity to establish the lexicons of the gender culture and show that the Masculinists can win as a whole matter is in the mainstream Feminist media.
Get those Feminazis: “On to Berlin.”
Like or Dislike:
9 
1
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1336291/Wikileaks-Julian-Assanges-2-night-stands-spark-worldwide-hunt.html
Like or Dislike:
6 
2
A good summary.
Like or Dislike:
2 
1
This just goes to validate the internet wisdom “don’t stick your dick in crazy”.
Like or Dislike:
13 
1
I hope both these girls get jailed for falsely accusing him. It’s fair, but not in the eyes of a feminist; such as these two winners.
Like or Dislike:
12 
1
I don’t need the courts to tell me the obvious – a man is not a rapist just because the condom breaks and the woman continues having sex with him.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
0
Anyway to get him would be perfectly fine with me. Lock him up now.
Like or Dislike:
0 
12
It is time for Ana Ardin and Sofia Wilen to step
into the Public and make a Statement!
We live in 2011 ,they can do this today without being burned!!
They have to!!
now,my very personal obs.,someone here,earlier, pointed out her body language and appearance!
What you think?Does Sofia Wilen look confident and secure to pull of a Accusation like this??
One hour with a Psychiatrist and she will crack,i say!!
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
He didn’t rape them; I thought that Swedish women enjoyed sex?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
{ 9 trackbacks }