White Nationalism? More like White Knight Nationalism

by Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech on April 25, 2010

As I have discussed before female supremacism isn’t limited to just feminism. As we know there is conservative female supremacism and Islamic female supremacism. There are a lot more than three forms of female supremacism. White Nationalism is also a form of female supremacism. White Nationalism promotes misandry by attempting to turn what would otherwise obviously be issues caused by misandry to issues of race. It seeks to keep men of different races from working together and discovering how much they have in common.

Our own Ferdinand Bardamu had a post at his personal blog recently about a dustup at AltRight among the White Nationalist crowd there that laid bare the misandryinherentin White Nationalism. As you can see from the link, White Nationalism is filled with women who except for the racial rhetoric sound like feminist, manginas, and (ironically) white knights. Let’s look a few examples of the comments from the White Nationalist crowd at AltRight starting with this one:

Mr. Locklin, I do hope that your desire for foreign women won’t overshadow the white man’s duty to reproduce with his own racial group.

Other than the racial rhetoric this could have been written by a conservative female supremacist white knight. Look at this one:

To broadly insult our mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters in this manner is tasteless. Both American women and men have some changing to do, changing we can do ourselves. But you’re doing what feels good for you and that’s what counts for you. Paradoxically, you’re the typical modern American man: empowered, sassy, sarcastic, and dedicated to gratifying yourself. You’re not loyal to the nation or interested in seeing it through to a restoration. You’re doing your own thang and won’t take no bojive from people who are offended when you insult them.

This is nothing but garden variety anti-male shaming language. However, that doesn’t beat what a White Nationalist woman has to say:

Lock-load is an insulting cretin. As well as an utter moron. The article is loaded with errors. He shows two pictures of actresses. Lillian Gish was an American woman She had a career that spanned decades.This makes her a successful career woman, who succeeded in a business crawling with the Tribe. She would not have endured the juvenile insults of a pathetic, inadequate joke Lockloser for 2 seconds.

Neither would have Hedy Lamar, a woman that used her exquisite beauty to garner every type of material benefit imaginable. She was bi-sexual, and fled Nazi Germany, to serve the goalso of Die Jude, in America. Lockloser most likely would not have had enough cold hard cash to elicit her attention. Her idea of a dinner date would have included diamond bracelets, as hors d’ oerves.

Lockboor then includes the photographs of an assortment of foul Lesbians, and Jewesses, as representative of American females. Which they are decidely not. The promotion of every sort of denegeracy, in every American institution, is the work of the Frankfurt School of Talmudic Jewry. The horrors of a degraded American, and global, womanhood, is the work of the Jew.

Lockinadequete-appendage rhapsodizes about the helpfulness of foreign females, and asserts that they aren’t as greedy and grasping. I suspect Lockmommy’sboy is exceptionally good at retaining his small hoard of cash, and resents the expenditure of the price of a hotdog, on a sidewalk stand, on any female, but if he thinks that foreign females are not materially obssessedm and greedier than George Soros, he’s still a virgin. Asiatics are the most soulless, heartless, absolutely ammoral hardheaded gold-diggers, that have ever befouled the Earth. Impovershed Eastern European females are not far behind. I have personally witnessed the very thorough skinning of every assett, of American White males, who have sought “submissive, demure” foreign brides. I have laughed in the faces, of those men, when they bemoaned their impovershment, and legal ravagement. They got what they sought, and they got what they deserved.

Finally, the White Nationalist movement is always whining about the absence of females. Gee, I wonder if snarky, snot-drenched attitudes, exemplified by Locksociallyretarded, have anything to due with this problem? Sorry, fellas, it’s not women that have to please you, you have to please, and lure in women.

Yup. It’s true. My 9 year old nephew has better social skills, than do 90% of you.

Gee, thanks, Richard Spencer, for publishing this insulting garbage. All this article has done is PISS OFF a lot of WN females.

I demand an apology. And a retraction.

Really, I do.

As a White American Woman. Who talks to a lot of other White American women. Who have HAD IT with snarky, juvenile, insulting socially-cretinous WN men.

This same woman wrote another similar comment:

Many, many of the comments reveal the precise nature of the problem, the boorishness, childishness, and social inpetitude of American males.

Once again, fellas, the onus is on YOU to please women. Not the other way around. Ghetto Negroes have better wooing, and flirtation skills, than so many White males. A lot of you guys are beyond pathetic. You really have nothing to offer females of any Race. A lot of you have very little money, and you are not as physically attractive as you flatter yourselves to be. To many of you, not all, but many, your attitude towards women is the most repellent aspect of your being. It’s not women, it’s you.

As anyone can see it’s all massive amounts of misandry and shaming language with some racial rhetoric thrown in. The misandry inherent in White Nationalism goes deeper than a few comments on the internet. Where did the false rape industry start? It wasn’t with feminists. The KKK (Ku Klux Klan) had their own version of the false rape industry white women would make false accusations of black men. Drop the racial terms and it’s no different the the current feminist false rape industry. Take a look at what happened during the Rosewood Massacre. A woman lies about being beaten and raped and a random black man living in Rosewood gets lynched. Then a massive battle between white men and black men happened where at least several men got killed. Multiple men died all because a woman lied about rape, but the Rosewood Massacre is not properly recognized as being part of the false rape industry because race was involved.

The misandry in White Nationalism goes even farther than just incidents like the Rosewood Massacre. The KKK had a corresponding group for women called the Women’s KKK or WKKK. The WKKK is very similar to feminism both in action and language. (Read the link for documentation of the similarities.) All you have to do is drop the words white and black from WKKK language, and you end up with feminist language.

We have to remember that misandry is the central problem facing all men today. That’s true regardless of what race a man is. Men of all races have a great deal in common. White Nationalism tries to hide that fact effectively acting as a vehicle for the promotion of misandry to benefit (white) women. White Nationalism and other racist ideologies are misandarist and benefit no man.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

George Benson January 10, 2011 at 16:04

You’d be hard-pressed to find a more right-wing gynocentric website than Spiritwaterblood. That website is the epitome of woman-worship amongst white nationalists. The author has praised “The Thinking Housewife” blog as being one of the best blogs on the internet.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 2
John April 27, 2011 at 10:17

Too true.

The “female” commentators on WN sites are at least as shaming and self-righteous as those on lefty-feminist sites, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if half of them had some sort of moustache getting a bit out of control on the upper lip and hairy armpits. In truth, the majority of their comments are disgusting to read, and that’s if you are lucky(?) enough to be able to decipher what they are trying to say because of their almost universal lack of analytical thought process and woeful grammatical skills. I keep thinking “old doublewide trailers” halfway through their first paragraph and simultaneously envision that old hag up on the mountain during the first part of the movie “Rob Roy” presently sitting in front of a computer.

And look at this gem from the article above – “Once again, fellas, the onus is on YOU to please women. Not the other way around. Ghetto Negroes have better wooing, and flirtation skills, than so many White males.”

Here we have a supposed W.N. self-imagined “White Goddess” who has experience with being wooed by “Ghetto Negroes” and she expresses admiration for their flirtation skills. Got her thing tingling, I see. Maybe that “tingling” was satiated a few times by one or more of those “Ghetto Blacks”, yet some “Bush” swilling W.N. “White Knight” will draw his sword and proclaim, “I will defend this sluts honor to my death!”

Yeah. “Git-R-Done” and all that, Jackass.

Insofar as the WN men go, I’d have to agree that the majority of them are likely bunion-rubbers, drink the cheapest of beer, fondle their Chinese SKS nightly, and do whatever the “Old Lady” tells them to do while they strut around in front of their friends and the mountain of aluminum empties like little Bantam roosters. Almost as a universal, they hold up the WN females as godesses in spite of the fact that 99% of those “ladies” have had their holes punched and left full of biological waste by more men than there are oil companies that have ever drilled wells in Texas. Frankly, it’s pathetic. “Yup, I got me a good one down at the used lot! Low mileage but ridden really hard. I like ‘em that way. We even goes to church now! Naw, them’s her kids from one of them other fella’s, I think.”

Got an American’ flag hanging in the yard over near the pickup, and when properly drunk they sing along with Lee Greenwood, mumbling “and I’m proud to be an American, because at least I know I’m free.” Is this a great country or what?

Are W.N.-types correct when they posit that other outgroups are to blame for what has happened in this country? Yes and no. The zeitgeist is the zeitgeist, and indeed powerful and convincing forces are behind it. Yet, no one forces anyone to be a direct participant. Anyone can opt out. There is no “rule” that posits that women must be self-centered, rationalization hamster whores nor does one exist which mandates that men should be layabout cads who “pump and dump” to prove their manhood to themselves. As the Knight Templar stated in one of those Indiana Jones moves, “He chose poorly”, and so do women in droves.

I happened upon one of Professor Kevin MacDonalds books, “Culture of Critique” some time back, and this superb work – peer reviewed and footnoted beyond belief (given the topic, a grand idea), left me with absolutely no doubt that what has happened to this country is no accident, but rather by planning and design. Nevertheless, free will is free will, and people chose the immoral and degrading path that was and continues to be followed. Evil forces are indeed hard at work, but as I argued earlier, no one forces anyone to chose evil over good.

Are there “good women” who are also blessed with high intelligence who are ethnically conscious. Assuredly, whether they are White, Black, Asian or Mestisto. I’ve got no problem with people being proud of their race and culture, and if anything, am chagrined that because of “political correctness” it is almost impossible to express pride in the white race without being instantaneously labeled a racist. Nothing like a pejorative to end an intelligent discussion.

Nevertheless, the few times that I have come across W.N. websites, given the general lack of intellectual consideration demonstrated in the writing, the vitriolic garbage spouted by the little goddesses with the worn-out D.N.A. receptacles, as well as the almost moronic defense of today’s white women by the “White Knights”, I am not overly compelled to return. In general terms, outside of the superb work at “The Occidental Observer” (with generally poor commentary), I am not compelled to return. There’s simply no “There, there.” Pro-active solutions are absent, and what you have is just keyboarded yelling by the men and senseless, self-promoting, male-shaming bitching by the bitches.

Insofar as the W.N. men go, they are almost their own worst enemies. The W.N. women? You may as well go over and hang out at feministing. For a good time call 1-800-BITCH. As a rule they are disgusting hypocrites and beyond disappointing. Hell, the best description is repellent. Yes, repellent.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 10 Thumb down 5
Maaldweb April 28, 2011 at 14:08

There were comments by other WN women in that article which expressed far different opinions than the one you chose to use as an example of the typical WN woman. But you ignored them and you decided to present the one which supports your negative opinion.

All that cherry-picking reminds me the work of feminist “academics”.
They find a grave of a female with a sword buried in it, next thing you have people writing phds about all-female roman legions and hordes of female viking warriors.

Your mistake is that you honestly expect females (WN or other) to accept their errors and being able to have a rational debate, well that cannot happen. You don’t argue with women, no matter how eloquent you are, no matter how strong are your arguments, you won’t convince them. With women there is only one recipe tried and used for millenia it is back to the kitchen by group pressure (re: society).

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 7
Kris W June 22, 2011 at 01:59

Three of the founding members of the National Organization of Women where former leaders in the Women’s Klu Klux Klan.

Modern feminism has it’s origins in the White Female Supremacist movement.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Jake April 30, 2012 at 03:30

This is the true nature of WN women. If they can’t brainwash you into thinking like they do, they’ll literally try to Black-Male you into doing what they want. Clinging to white women is like having a ball and chain on your leg, you have to drag them into the future. White Nationalism does not serve the interests of white men. Some white men will never learn because they’re enslaved to the beauty of white women, not me.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3
No June 1, 2013 at 02:33

This is why no White man worth his weight in gold would ever become an MRA or what ever this crap is. Feminism isn’t any better. Both are meant to unnecessarily divide White people. I think any aware White Nationalist knows who’s responsible for this crap.

Avoid this subject altogether. Don’t pay attention to it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3

Leave a Comment

{ 13 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: