Deconstructing Popular Music: Fall Out Boy’s G.I.N.A.S.F.S.; A Lament for Patriarchy

by J. Durden on January 31, 2010

So, like most people I know, I am a fan of music. Moreover, I enjoy analyzing music and figuring out what sorts of messages listeners decode, and what sorts of messages the musicians intended on encoding. I’m not so good at the instrumental theory part, but I love picking apart lyrics for meanings. If this sounds like a waste of time to you, then depart now. This post is meant purely as an enjoyable intellectual exercise for myself and for any like-minded readers. If the readers like this sort of thing, I could make it a sort of regular feature. Mind you, I don’t often listen to “popular” music, but I think pop music can reflect a lot of cultural values (see my previous post on Jack and Diane, for instance).

That being said, I know the intent behind the song in question. G.I.N.A.S.F.S. (the video isn’t perfect, I just pulled one quickly) is, apparently, an acronym which stands for “Gay Is Not A Synonym For Shitty,” and the song is generally interpreted as a sort of homosexual love ballad. This was probably the intention the band had for the song. I am not rejecting this interpretation or saying it is wrong or anything of the sort (complaints about political correctness aside).

However, I think it’s possible to interpret the lyrics with a different bent – note that I am acknowledging that the artist probably had no intention whatsoever of the lyrics being interpreted this way, but that’s half the fun of deconstructing music. My theory is thus: the song can be interpreted as a sort of lament from women to men, a longing for a return to patriarchy in light of the ills of feminism. This will be fleshed out, but keep in mind the fact that most women are not “feminists” in the sense that they are die-hard believers – they mostly believe since everybody else believes and they experience a lot of cognitive dissonance about it.

Let’s take a look at the first verse:

I loved everything about you that hurts
So let me see your moves
Let me see your moves
Lips pressed close to mine
True Blue

First, it is relavent to note that the opening line is apparently a quote (first one) from the movie Closer. I’ve never seen the movie. Facts aside and back to my “for fun” interpretation:

Here, we can see the beginnings of Woman’s (read as: the average woman) lament. She loved everything about men – even the parts that hurt, or were hard to swallow (standard male emotional masks, over aggressive tendencies, insensitivites, you get the idea). These things that hurt caused her to pursue alternate modes of fulfillment – specifically, male modes (“so let me see your moves, let me see your moves”). Because she wasn’t satisfied in her womanly role, she was easily lured into pursuing traditionally male modes of fulfillment (careers, etc).

For the sake of my theory, let’s say that the bottom lines represent Woman’s struggle to fully adapt to a man’s world – “True Blue” can be interpreted as a symbol for Woman’s desire for a traditional relationship/traditional man, and “lips pressed close to mine” indicates that, at some point in the past, she had such a relationship.

It is interesting to note that in one of the communication courses I’ve taken, “blue” is described as having the following characteristics (keep this in mind for later):

Blue represents people who prefer a calm life – neat and orderly, with peace and tranquility. They are introverts, often deliberate and introspective but not too intellectual. Blue people are steady, diligent, hard working, and with the persistence to become successful and make a lot of money. They are admired and respected for their sensitivity to others and their secure hold on their emotions. Blues know how to concentrate and how to accept responsibilities and obligations.

I know what you’re thinking – ultimate Beta? Still, as we all know, Betas had a much better go at life (to include a lot more respect) under patriarchy. This fits with Woman’s desire for a True Blue – for a very strong Beta that could provide for her, if only things weren’t so different now.

Next verse:

But the prince of any failing empire knows that
Everybody wants, everybody wants
To drive on through the night
If it’s a drive back home

Now, this is a great verse that lends itself strongly to my theory. Here, Woman is chastising Man (“the prince”) for his failure to keep the empire together. She’s saying, don’t you know that everyone really does love the empire, and you can’t let a few naysayers tear it apart? What everyone truly wants, she’s saying, is for you to stay the course and take us through “the night” (the night almost always seems to represent trouble or danger of some kind in any sort of literary analysis – in this case, it represents the early threat of feminism to more traditional ways of living). Specifically, everyone wants this to drive on through the night, especially if it’s a drive back home – home of course, in this context, meaning back to more traditional modes of living and organizing society. Woman is angry with Man for this failure. It’s a sort of sly dig – since “the prince of any failing empire knows,” what is really being said is that all princes in all failing empires should know that, despite loud complaints, what Women want is strong leadership and solid commitment to going back “home,” home here being a symbol for (lack of better terms) patriarchy.

Now, the chorus:

Things aren’t the same anymore
Some nights, they get so bad
You almost pick up the phone

Trade baby blues for wide eyed browns
I sleep with your old shirts
And walk through this house in your shoes
I know it’s strange
It’s a strange way of saying
That I know I’m supposed to love you
I’m supposed to love you

There’s a lot going on here. Clearly, things aren’t the same anymore – society, if we can call it that, now barely represents what it once was. Woman is encouraged to pursue a career and basically live like men used to in order to find fulfillment. Giving into natural impulses over rational ones (hypergamy and polygamy versus monogamy) and pursuing hedonism (under the guise of consumerism) rule the times, rather than the values civilization used to be known for (in living memory!). Woman is simply trying to do what society has told her to do, buying into the language ideology (imposed by public education, the news media, the entertainment industry, corporate culture and the legal system) which tells her that the key to happiness and fulfillment is career first, family later. Some nights, however, it gets so bad (the cognitive dissonance becomes so great) that she almost picks up the phone (note the literary use of the universal you, a technique I often employ in my own writing – using “you” even when I mean “I”), presumably to call True Blue back – you know, opting for traditional ways over contemporary ones.

To cope, she’s traded True Blue in for wide-eyed (read: innocent, credulous, even childlike and simple) Browns. Remember how I described Blue, above? Here’s Brown from the same sheet:

Brown[s are] steady in their ways, persistent and tenacious, rational, and sensible. Brown people tend to indulge themselves; they have an ageless quality and never seem to change. They are able to think things through and assume responsibilities. They never seem to make promised that they do not intend to carry out, and they are conscientious in all they undertake.

To me, this sounds like a toned-down beta. Just as feminism has impacted women negatively and sullied them overall, so too has feminism toned down traditional male values and had a negative impact on men overall. Rather than Blue’s ability to “know how to concentrate and accept responsibilities and obligations,” we have Brown’s reduced but similar capacity to “think things through and assume responsibilities.” Blues are “steady, diligent, hard working and…[can] become successful and make a lot of money” whereas Browns are merely “steady in their ways” with no hint as to being successful. If Woman becomes tired of pursuing endless hypergamous fantasies (which she may not be able to do successfully, especially as an “average” woman – alphas will only bed the best), Brown is the best she can hope to settle for.

The last few lines are the ones that initially tuned me into this song, specifically the part about “I know it’s strange…it’s a strange way of saying I know I’m supposed to love you.” Here, Woman is saying that she’s dressing up like men (see also: women in business suits, women in uniform), which she knows is strange. The best she has to offer is that perhaps this is a strange way of saying she loves men, after all – despite the misandry that society pushes on her and, at times, can brainwash her into promoting. How’s the old saying go – imitation is the highest form of flattery? Furthermore, it seems to make sense that women would attempt to play out these roles, if they have a deep yearning for them, absent a culture where men play them out.

Next verse:

I’ve already given up on myself twice
Third time is the charm, third time is the charm
Threw caution to the wind
But I’ve got a lousy arm

This is pretty straightforward. We can interpret her “giving up on herself” to mean that she’s already tried to toss aside feminism and its model for her success twice before. After all, if she is the average woman, she is prone to think that the messages society broadcasts to her are to be trusted and best represent “reality.” Perhaps she’s been married twice before, or she’s “fallen in love” twice before. “Third time is the charm” means that she’s found another man to love/marry. The part about having a lousy arm fits too, since we know women on average have half the upper body strength of men.

And I’ve traced your shadows on the wall
Now I kiss them whenever I’m down
Whenever I’m down
Figured on not figuring myself out

More lament for the loss of Man in Woman’s life. The last line is the most important. She is cognizant enough to realize that she doesn’t know herself very well (more evidence of cognitive dissonance) but perhaps isn’t cognizant enough to know why she has a hard time figuring herself out (protip: it’s due to the constant bombardment of the enforcers of language ideology – public education, news media, entertainment industry, corporate culture and the legal system!).

The chorus repeats and we move into the refrain:

Born under a bad sign but you saved my life
That night on the roof of your hotel
“Cross my heart and hope to die
Splintered from the headboard in my eye”
Photo-proofed kisses I remembered so well

I suppose this is a sort of happy ending to the tale. Woman was born under a bad sign (feminism) but luckily she was able to find a Man to save her life – presumably, show her how feminism has poisoned her and many others, and show her the path to happiness. The rest of the lyrics here probably reference something very personal to the band or what have you and aren’t easily interpreted for my purposes, so I kind of just ignore them. Feel free to help me out, though!

The song kicks into the chorus one more time before closing. So, major points – women like patriarchy, too (even if they aren’t cognizant of it), and can be upset with men for failing to enforce it (as, after all, women can’t rightly be expected to impose anything by their very natures).

Let’s not forget that patriarchy works, and when patriarchy fails, so too does civilization.

Who knew you could learn such important and far-reaching social truths from a seemingly simple Fall Out Boy song?

{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }

Globalman January 31, 2010 at 14:49

The bad guys use music lyrics to brainwash the unsuspecting as well. Plato proposed that music be controlled by the state because it is so powerful. Check out some of the lyrics in Bad Romance by Lady Gaga…..

I want your ugly
I want your disease
I want your everything
As long as it’s free
I want your love
I want your drama
The touch of your hand
I want you leather-studded kiss in the sand
I want your love
I want your loving
And I want your revenge
I want your horror
I want your design
‘Cause you’re a criminal
As long as your mine
I want your psycho
Your vertigo stick
Want you in my room
When your baby is sick

Work-work fashion baby
Work it
move that bitch crazy
I’m a free bitch baby

A pretty negative image of ‘relationships’ and this has been downloaded 90 millions times on you-tube.

Or how about ‘poker face’?
Luck and intuition play the cards with Spades to start
And after he’s been hooked I’ll play the one that’s on his heart
I wanna roll with him a hot pair we will be
A little gambling is fun when you’re with me (I love it)
Russian Roulette is not the same without a gun,
And baby when it’s love if its not ruff it isn’t fun, fun

Hhmmm…she is wearing a poker face so he can’t tell what deception she is plotting and once she hooked him she’s going to play the card on his heart. Surely women don’t manipulate men do they? Yep. And they are even willing to brag about it now.

And I like the bit about russian roulette, to go wth Rihannas song of the moment, and sex has to be rough to be fun. There are lots of such lyrics in her album. Indeed. Most of ‘Fame Monster’ is a recipe for how to have bad relationships. This from a woman who has joked she wants to turn the whole world ‘gay’. No prizes for guessing who is giving her her lines.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
OneSTDV January 31, 2010 at 16:39

@ Globalman:

I’d say most people who downloaded that Gaga song did so because of the beat, not because of the message.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1
Zeta January 31, 2010 at 17:14

Sure, that’s why so many Clint Eastwood types are Lady Gaga fans. Give me a break. It appeals to that young, female crowd because of the image and the lyrics. It does not appeal to the Clint Eastwood crowd because they don’t take pride in moral degradation and loose sexual mores.

Don’t you think the record companies know what they’re getting and who the Lady Gagas of the world are going to appeal/be marketed to? C’mon man.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Pro-male/Anti-feminist Tech January 31, 2010 at 20:47

I’d say most people who downloaded that Gaga song did so because of the beat, not because of the message.

Agreed. I bet most people can’t tell you what the lyrics of that song are, much less be influenced by it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
by_the_sword January 31, 2010 at 21:34

I’d say that having any band named [insert word]-boy is a sign of decaying manhood.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
Kathy February 1, 2010 at 00:03

I think that Globalman makes a very good point here. Lady Gaga’s lyrics in Bad Romance really are trash. The music however is very catchy. I do agree, Pro and STDV, that people would be attracted to the song because of the beat, and may not notice the lyrics.

Many young kids do listen to the lyrics though..

The song is on the radio over here all the time. I heard my daughter singing along to the lyrics a few weeks ago, though not understanding what the hell it all meant. Now, I do listen to the lyrics of songs and sometimes sing along in the car.. I have a very good memory, but not such a good voice. ;) I had already ascertained that the song had crap lyrics but a good beat.

I explained to my daughter why the lyrics were not good. It does worry me that she maybe influenced over a period of time by such unsavoury, lyrics. That is why I am always aware of what music she listens too.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
3Dog February 1, 2010 at 01:17

Jesus christ, people being influenced by songs? Give me a break, the truth is the world is filled with stupid people. If you’re dumb enough to be influenced by fantasy then we are really in trouble. If we really want to “save the future” we would start by eliminating anyone with an IQ below 105, and paying people with high IQ’s to have harems, and provide for them. Instead we breed average tonnes of average mediocrity, lets remember that 80% of all people are between below to average, to slightly above average.

For instance the spearhead has an anti intellectual slant and believes that the patriarchy “works” yet denies that every civilization and empire that has ever existed has vanished from the face of the earth, it also denies the horror’s of slavery and aspects of american capitalism and it elevates american and fellates american ideals (which lets face it are highly imperfect) above any other way of life. Many at the spearhead come off as idealistic pro american, pro agression pro capitalist morons who’ve never picked up a book much less read much history. History is a process that is never over, there are fits and starts all the time, a highly technological civilization with deep specialization will breed collectivism because it’s required, even corporations and tech companies rely on the collectivist tendencies of society to care and raise children and school them, the demands on human beings are the real problem, capitalism breeds unrealistic demands that average human being cannot meet, and most pro american idealogues are among the average. Wise and intelligent people know that human beings are extremely imperfect beings and there claims to any idealogy as “the one and only way” are highly flawed and laced with hypocrisy.

Even the language at the spearhead you can tell is littered with americanism.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Welmer February 1, 2010 at 01:24

…it also denies the horror’s of slavery and aspects of american capitalism…

-3dog

Speaking for myself, I don’t think I’ve ever denied those here, and in fact I’ve openly done the opposite. You’ll find lots of different opinions on The Spearhead, which was one of the reasons I started it in the first place, so it’s kind of inaccurate to ascribe one single POV to the site.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Ivo Vos February 1, 2010 at 01:43

Hi, J. Durden.
Nice article, just before going to work, here are the words of one of my latest rock songs (the basic groove is a bit like the main groove in child in time):

For crying out loud
Men paid too long a price
And not speaking out
led to cheating the dice

With the reason destroyed
and replaced by fear
in the disguise of love
it’s the message we hear

Refr

Look, the water ‘s burning
And it’s burning till the clock o’nine
Lord let a bright light shine
Too many men walkin the line

And I see a distant lightning
I can hear the thunder roar
I can feel the earth is shaking
And it sounds like the winds of war

And the battle cry of feministas for off limits equality

The ugly face of love’s destruction, another round of slavery

What started as a candle
to shine a light upon us all
became without a candleholder
a wildfire out of control

Refr
Look, the castle’s crumbling
The queen is falling without her wings
The working bees ate all the honey
All we can hear is a barren wind

We, we don’t need
another force to scorch our earth
We, we don’t need
another power to despise our worth

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 1
piercedhead February 1, 2010 at 02:08

Wise and intelligent people know that human beings are extremely imperfect beings and there claims to any idealogy as “the one and only way” are highly flawed and laced with hypocrisy.

I doubt you would have bothered leaving such a long comment at a site with an “anti-intellectual slant”. A little honesty would have better accompanied the compliment.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Gunslingergregi February 1, 2010 at 03:21

”””””’it also denies the horror’s of slavery ”””’

I don’t deny the horrors of slavery that men face every day while the system uses their kids as a means of extorting there sweat and tears.

”””””’Wise and intelligent people know that human beings are extremely imperfect beings and there claims to any idealogy as “the one and only way” are highly flawed and laced with hypocrisy.
””””””’
My way is the one and only way to be free of the chains that bind and I could probably teach the concept to a moron easier than a person with 120 iq.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Anonymous February 1, 2010 at 05:44

Durden, You may like the web site vigilantcitizenDOTcom. He looks into the occult symbolism in all aspects of society, particularly in music.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Firepower February 1, 2010 at 10:28

Fallout Boy is plainly advancing the image of the Feminized Man further.

Pasty emos who go all Wuthering Heights when “She” doesn’t respond to a voicemail, and the extreme of Feminization of faggotry.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Kezia February 1, 2010 at 13:42

I’m looking forward to your deconstruction of “I want it that way” by the Backstreet Boys. Do you have any self awareness?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
J. Durden February 1, 2010 at 21:12

@ Kezia:

Do you have any self awareness?

Nope. None whatsoever. Not at all.

Now that I have answered your question, I think it is only fair of you to answer one of mine. Do you have any reading comprehension, or did you just miss the part that goes like this:

…I love picking apart lyrics for meanings. If this sounds like a waste of time to you, then depart now. This post is meant purely as an enjoyable intellectual exercise for myself and for any like-minded readers.

Firepower February 2, 2010 at 10:44

Kezia February 1, 2010 at 13:42

I’m looking forward to your deconstruction of “I want it that way” by the Backstreet Boys. Do you have any self awareness?

Perhaps you will grace us with dissertation of Madonna’s Vogue – or a litany of the Courtney Love-fronted Hole or Babes In Toyland. Should be heady stuff and I’d be glad to offer helpful critique.

J Durden hit on many worthy points on this one. I earlier questioned his choice of musical eras, but he’s right on target about the self-aggrandizing faggot Pete Wentz and the tired androgynous thing well worn out from even the Bowie Glitter Rock era.

So go fingerbang yourself.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Firepower February 2, 2010 at 11:00

I get the opposite impression – that Lady Gaga is a submissive – that she’d be a good little bitch.

I said the same thing about Amy Winehouse – God knows the Britties could use a dose of mercy from their pop singers.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
NoThankYou March 1, 2010 at 23:13

Dear Crybabies,

I stumbled upon your den of thinly veiled insecurity and misogynistic vitriol purely by chance, but even so I felt like I had to make a comment before leaving forever. The totality of what I wish to express is this:

You can vote. You can own property. Roughly 100% of all US presidents have been men. That these facts fail to comfort you simply highlights your status as whimpering, dickless children. My advice: chin up, chest out, find some self-esteem, live your life like a normal person and try not to shit your pants if you ever run into a woman who is better at math than you.

Your pal,

Almost Wishing I Was A Woman Just So I Could Show You Up By Beating You At Scrabble

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Hollie November 3, 2011 at 10:35

Heckuva good job. I sure appcriaete it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 6 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: