Affirmative Action Begins to Favor Men in Swedish Universities, is Promptly Abolished

by W.F. Price on January 12, 2010

[Ed. -- The following article was sent in by a reader kind enough to keep us apprised of international news]

In a stunning about face Sweden plans to remove gender quotas for admissions to university and college programs because not enough women are getting accepted to certain courses. The quota system was originally implemented to ensure that women were received to these programs in equal numbers to men. However, this has resulted in many women from being denied places because the course is already over enrolled with women. Under the existing quota system men have received priority in those courses where their gender was underrepresented, such as veterinary medicine, dentistry, medicine and psychology.

Higher Education and Science minister, Tobias Krantz, was quoted in the newspaper Dagens Nyheter as saying [trans.] “The education system should open doors – not slam them in the face of women motivated to study.” Note how his comment prioritizes women over men.

So, once again we see that the goalposts are moved in order to cater for the advantage of women. When the quota system was originally introduced, and women were gaining entry to university slots despite not having the highest grades, that was fine. Now that the situation has been reversed and female students with high grades are being excluded the rules are to be changed. The confused Swedes will soon realize that removing the affirmative action quota system will revert the situation back in “favor of men” and will in all probability come up with a new law that just discriminates against men.

Krantz noted in his opinion piece, “Consequences show that ideology plays a roll. A socialist system that pits one group against another tends to lead to unforeseen results.”

{ 49 comments… read them below or add one }

Snark January 12, 2010 at 15:07

I assume that new gender quotas will soon be implemented which allow more females than males entry.

As in, 70/30 on the side of women.

It is Sweden, after all.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
Reinholt January 12, 2010 at 15:21

It is this sort of thing that reveals the true nature of the feminist agenda.

Back in my college days, I was on an advisory board for one of the college clubs that dealt with the administration. When it came to the topic of getting women into STEM, I proposed the simple solution:

Require ALL collegiate majors to have an equal number of men and women (with about ~2.5% room for error); this would mean that the college would have to have balanced admissions and all departments would have to allow for a balanced number of majors.

This was immediately shot down by the majority of the female-dominated major departments, and was never heard of again.

Go figure; they want to take without giving. 70%+ females is fine, but any more than 50% males is not.

Equality my ass.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0
Evil Pundit January 12, 2010 at 15:25

Here’s an article in the English version of Sweden’s The Local.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Novaseeker January 12, 2010 at 15:45

Go figure; they want to take without giving. 70%+ females is fine, but any more than 50% males is not.

Equality my ass.

This is because their underlying assumption is that women are superior to men, and that the only reason women have not dominated the species prior to now is that men kept them down using our physical power. The idea is that if you take away male physical power, women will, and by right should, dominate the species utterly in all spheres. It’s female supremacy masquerading as “equality” and it underlies most of feminist theory. Using that reasoning, it makes “sense” for universities to be dominated by women, because women are simply superior to men. It’s a sexist ideology, for certain, but that epithet will also never be allowed because of male physical power (in theory). Because males possess a physical power over females (even if it is illegal to use it), the ideology is that women are always either oppressed by men or subject to being oppressed by men — so that it’s impossible for women, who are a permanent physical underclass, to be sexist against men.

The truth is that per the bell curve men will always dominate at the right tail, unless they are actively discriminated against. And that is still pretty much the case today. However, what is happening is that as college/university admission has become more mainstream, women are outnumbering men — which makes some sense because women are more clustered towards the middle of the bell curve, whereas men are more spread. There are more male underachievers than female underachievers, just per the bell curve, which is just the way it is. It’s fine to accept that, I think, provided that the right end of the bell curve isn’t tinkered with by law. And therein lies the issue. Feminists are hell bent on upsetting the right end of the bell curve (e.g., by forcing parity in STEM subjects based on sex) while ignoring the left end of the bell curve (e.g. by disallowing male preference in admissions for sex balancing at places *other than* the right end of the curve). It’s very much a take, take and take again philosophy underlying feminism — of women, by women, and for women. It has nothing to do with equality, and never has — it has to do with securing and reinforcing total female domination of the human species, full stop.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1
zed January 12, 2010 at 15:55

It’s very much a take, take and take again philosophy underlying feminism — of women, by women, and for women. It has nothing to do with equality, and never has — it has to do with securing and reinforcing total female domination of the human species, full stop.

Give them an inch, and they will take your arm.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1
Advocatus Diaboli January 12, 2010 at 15:59

Jilted Wife Rewires Husbands Power Tools To Deliver 220 Volts Of Revenge
http://gizmodo.com/5446305/jilted-wife-rewires-husbands-power-tools-to-deliver-220-volts-of-revenge

“What she did was reverse the wires on his 220-volt table saw—delivering a shock that knocked him to the ground. He didn’t suffer any lasting effects from the shock, but Carolyn was booked for investigation of third-degree assault, domestic violence, and second-degree malicious mischief. She was later released by judge let her go on her own recognizance.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Rebel January 12, 2010 at 16:04

Clearly, in Sweden, men are the weaker sex. The same applies to all Scandinavian countries, perhaps with Finland as an exception.

The U.K., unfortunately, is pretty much on their way down. Can you imagine that less than a century ago, England had an empire?

Continental Europe is falling in the grips of the left.
North America and the Australian continent in their entirety are also on their way down.

We are making room for the next empire, since the American empire, although mighty powerful, is also disintegrating. The ONE thing these countries/ continents have in common is… you got it: feminism!

Now, I want to say this: The West Is Commiting Suicide.

A gender war is a suicide. I am willing to argue this thought with all the power I can muster.

What will come next is anybody’s guess. If I had an answer to the question, it would probably be: the elimination of the white race.

I know it sounds un PC, but I could not care less.

I am not a racist by any measure, I can assure you. A human being is a human being: cultures reflect our creativity. That being said clearly, miscegenation is practiced more and more: we represent only 8% of total population. We will be swallowed and betrayed. And our betrayers are our own kind: our women, our complementary side. A Yan but no Yin or vice-versa: nothingless.

We are, in this thread, pointing out to the center of the problem. (I hope my French way of expressing myself does not hamper intelligibility in communications).

The end objective of those who work in the shadow is what we must concentrate upon if we are willing to fight.
I, for one, will do my part. I’d rather die on my feet than on my knees.

I think this one thred is an important discussion because if we find out who the real enemy is (remember Sun Tzu: deception), then we can fight. And when we do, it will be with the full power of our wrath.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Rebel January 12, 2010 at 16:06

Again a typo! thread, not thred. Sorry.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Rebel January 12, 2010 at 16:09

I should have added something about miscegenation: the mail-order bride. Why has it become so easy and so attractive to us, myself included?
How come IMBRA, instead of discouraging men from marrying outside, pushes them forward even more?

Are we being led into this?

Bah! maybe I think too much…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
zed January 12, 2010 at 16:17

I think this one thred is an important discussion because if we find out who the real enemy is (remember Sun Tzu: deception), then we can fight. And when we do, it will be with the full power of our wrath.

“We have met the enemy, and not only is he ours, he is us.”

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Globalman January 12, 2010 at 16:18

The senior professional swedish men my age are really fed up with women and they are very aggressive to their wives. (Remember, I am talking wives 45+)

They really don’t express much care or concern about their wives because they are past their use by date. Many of my swedish male friends will openly flirt with young women in front of their wives. They will call them fat and ugly in public or even at dinner parties. If the wife complains they tell them to shut up or leave.

I have had swedish men say in front of me to their wife “why don’t you shut up or fuck off”. At my exs 40th birthday party one of the swedish women got all hysterical and stormed out of the house to walk home in high heels. I went and told her husband this. His response was “who cares, she’s only my wife”.

The women who are in the 45+ range know full well that they are past their useby date and they have to put up with whatever is thrown at them. They are all 2, 3 , or 4 times divorced previously. I don’t know a single swedish couple where one of them is not divorced.

The young men seem to be completely manginaed but the older guys are just fed up to the back teeth.

Swedish women are also very vicious about women who do not work. They call them lux-hous-frau. Luxury house wife and it is a cutting comment if you are a swedish woman. Welcome to socialism…everyone always works their whole like while the kids are raised ‘by the state’ meaning brainless wimmin who teach propaganda.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
fedrz January 12, 2010 at 16:18

I suspect that men will dominate that right end of the bell curve, no matter what they try to do to advantage women over men… especially in academic matters.

It seems to me, that when men decide to take an extreme interest in something, they do it for the sake of their interest in that thing, rather than for any prestige that might come along with the position.

Great musicians, artists, inventors, and scientists have often been shunned by academia and hampered in their pursuits… and yet, the deaf Beethoven is likely one of the greatest musicians to have ever lived… Pasteur certainly didn’t gain academic acceptance for his theory on germs… Einstein was hampered in his academic pursuits and did much of his best work while trudging to his mundane job at the patent office… most artists don’t recognized for their brilliance until after their deaths… Edison was homeschooled because his teachers were angry that his mind wandered… the Wright brothers were dropouts, and yet challenged many of the aerodynamic theories of more established academics… Michael Dell dropped out of university after one year, and long held the title of richest man under 40… Bill Gates dropped out of university and has been the richest man in the world for how many years now?

And that’s just off the top of my head.

Kicking us out of University might be the best thing that happened to men since we invented sliced bread!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
fedrz January 12, 2010 at 16:28

Btw, I suspect that it won’t take long before men who’ve taken up studying Sexual Dynamics of their own interest, rather than for pay or prestige, will begin to dominate all the Gender Nitwits with their pricey, useless degrees.

We already know that we do… and it seems that more and more of the general population is discovering this as well.

Nothing would satisfy me more than the complete demise of academia.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
piercedhead January 12, 2010 at 16:31

Dropping out of university is often the making of a man. At once he’s freed of any illusions of any easy ride, given the opportunity to exercise his own judgment at the most important time of his life, and more likely earns money rather than borrows it.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Globalman January 12, 2010 at 16:33

“Kicking us out of University might be the best thing that happened to men since we invented sliced bread!”
Fedrz,
I do like your sense of humour. University was a complete waste of time for me anyway. The only interesting thing I did at university was one time I got drunk and volunteered to write a relational database management system for our software project. That was in 1985. It had locks, atomic updates, and dual logging. Those were pretty radical things for a pdp-11 based piece of software.

I’ve said here many times. Men have an obligation to take on younger guys and mentor them and train them up in their skills and to leave the wimmin in the dust.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
Globalman January 12, 2010 at 16:40

Men need look no further than software development to realise just how dominant men are at anything that actually takes intelligence, reasoning and logic.

There is no such thing as an excellent female software developer. Why? Because it is easy to tell when software is crap. In IT women are ‘team leaders’ because they can’t be programmers or systems architects. What they design does not work. They can’t be project managers either because that requires some respect to be earned. It is an extremely rare woman in IT that does well in the technical areas and that is mostly because they act very masculine. I know a couple like that.

In any job where it is easy to tell the output is crap women are mostly absent.

Women at ‘university’ are a complete joke. In my 4 years at university no woman got a HD in the software project. Not one. ALL HDs went to men. Women mostly got gullible betas to do their assignments for them and then claimed ‘discrimination’ if they did not pass their tests. No lecturer was willing to fail a woman for lack of ability. It meant he would likely lose his job.

Womens degrees have largely come to be meaningless.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0
Globalman January 12, 2010 at 16:44

“because if we find out who the real enemy is ”

Dude, the bad guys are the banksters who run the world. The committee of 300, the Council on Foreigh Relations, the Trilateral Commission and the families above them. Many have known this for many years. I only found out about it all this about 20 months ago.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Mr.M January 12, 2010 at 16:57

There is no such thing as an excellent female software developer. Why?

Cuz the patriarchy keeps us women down! It has nothing to do with general interest patterns of a gender! WE ARE EXCLUDED BY BAD MEN!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
The Caliph January 12, 2010 at 18:49

@ Rebel

You fail to see the big picture.

Most guys here will always miss the picture if you focus solely on trends in western culture.

Globalisation is aimed at bringing the whole world into one fold, feminism will be deployed in the developing world too, it is already happening.

Look how many women are in the new democratc iraqi parliament? Al gore was is Nigeria a while back calling for more women holding political office.
Hilary and her cohorts are focused on empowering women in Africa.

Now women have suffrage in kuwait and can vote, soon they will be able to drive in Saudi Arabia next step is polical office and the rest of the shebang you guys already know in the west as far as women and totaly freedom is concerned.

Just loook at here in Australia for example, most of the guys of Middle east descent are importing their brides from home, because even the arab girls here have been feminised, i went to UNI with a few. They are just as bad as the wite girls they like to diss as sluts. The women they bring oevr will simply get feminised too.

The aim isnt to cull only the ‘white race’, the aim is to cull all humanity.

The aim of the PTB is the same – depopulation of the globe and centrralisation of power, the strategy just varies based on the different cultures.

The Europeans and Asians shed a few useless eaters in 2nd world war, dictators like Mao and Stalin, the khmer rouge also did a good job culling the Asian populace. China has already implemented a 1 child policy, so there population will suddenly tank soon.

India atm is a wild card, but then, the chinese have some 40million fighting age bachelors whos wifes were never born, a war with india might be whats needed to reduce the two who collectively make up 35% of the human population (just speculating conspiracy shit here).

A more radical constant population bleeding approach is being adopted for africa. Slightly similar with South America with all the past civil wars there.

Europe is just at a different stage of the template, the rest of the world is about to be hit with the same malarchy.

The aim isnt to reduce white population, its to reduce ‘ALL’ populations.

The Georgia Guidestone is ‘NOT A PRANK’.

The killer? Inspite of all these plausible conspiracy scenarios i still believe a one world government is necessary. The means maybe ugly but the end is justified.

Us humans for the most parts are useless eaters. Just look how many manginas are still plugged to the fematrix? Simple common sense is enough to tell anyone something is rotten somewhere, yet even with internet and sites like spearhead most guys cant even be convinced to fight the most potent weapon ever deployed against human civilisation ‘FEMINISM’.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1
Cannon's Canon January 12, 2010 at 19:02

in the future, sweden will require its college applicants to breast-feed.

the men there are just ahead of the curve!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
The Fifth Horseman January 12, 2010 at 19:23

This, too, d0esn’t bug me. The losers from this are not men, but universities.

In the US, mroe women than men are in college, BUT in career-oriented fields like engineering, men still dominate.

So women are studying humanities, social sciences, etc.

Employers have responded by paying less to new college grads. While the MSM interprets this as an outcome of the bad economy, the real nuance is that the value of a Bachelor’s degree has declined in the employment market, due to dilution by women studying BS fields.

Men who are qualified are certainly not being barred from engineering or other real fields.

So the costs of feminism are being transferred to universities, in the form of a devaluation of a bachelor’s degree.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
G January 12, 2010 at 19:27

Nova,

This is because their underlying assumption is that women are superior to men, and that the only reason women have not dominated the species prior to now is that men kept them down using our physical power.

You know what this is? It’s childish. Exactly. Schopenhauer on women

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0
G January 12, 2010 at 19:31

On the same website look what I found:

Sweden world’s most expensive country’: index

The result is due to the fact that Sweden has the highest cost of living and is the most expensive country in the world,” said spokesperson Suzan Haskins.

http://www.thelocal.se/24284/20100108/

Anyone surprised?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
G January 12, 2010 at 19:35

Rebel, what is it about Finland? Perhaps their actions during WW2 (fighting both nazis and soviet union) while the rest of scandinavia stood passive is a good indicator. Simo Häyhä.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
3DShooter January 12, 2010 at 20:18

“The education system should open doors – not slam them in the face of women motivated to study.” But it’s quite acceptable to do that to men?? The very essence of discrimination . . .

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Gunslingergregi January 12, 2010 at 20:34

””””””’. There are more male underachievers than female underachievers, just per the bell curve,”””””’

Its not that there are less female underachievers than men. It is that females have a gazillion parachutes that protect them even if they are underachievers. They can have kids and get their own house and bills paid is kind of a big one. Guys on the other hand can go ahead and live on the street and get nothing.

Or they can use their pussy to rise high above their station faster than a man could. Tiger woods woman who made 300 million for having a vag and spent less times than tiger would have to earn the money.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Gunslingergregi January 12, 2010 at 20:37

Like you know the guys who make it then get a nice young woman who didn’t have to go through any of the icky bad parts of becoming successful. Just instant success by having vag.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
fedrz January 12, 2010 at 21:05

The more that men get shoved out of university, and still excel according to the nature of what God gave them, the more useless university educations will become.

What, with a declining economy, do you think that even MORE women will go to school?

And who fucking cares?

When there are 100 doctors in your town, and only one plumber who can fix your leaky sink… who do you think will be getting paid $500/hr?

Men will always lead the curve.

Always have, always will.

Dem’s da breaks, toots.

You got da tits, we gots da smarts.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Scattered January 13, 2010 at 01:52

Or perhaps the right tale becomes so de-motivated all thats left is a big steaming pile of mediocrity. Oh…wait a minute, thats already happened!

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Wobs January 13, 2010 at 02:26
Gunslingergregi January 13, 2010 at 02:49

””””””’When there are 100 doctors in your town, and only one plumber who can fix your leaky sink… who do you think will be getting paid $500/hr?””””””””””’

Truth.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Paul January 13, 2010 at 03:21

Although I understand why some might not think that what is happening in Sweden is all that bad for men, I can not see it as anything but a setback.

I am against all quotas but if feminist are advocating their removal it will not be for any other reason other than it will help women and damage men. What I think this shows is a moving forwards of the agenda. Quotas have served their purpose and now other strategies are being applied. What is also frightening about this development is the effortless way it has been accomplished. One entrenched principal, that of equal male and female participation, had been overthrown as though it was nothing. Such an idea would have been ridiculed as sexist even as recently as last week. Yet here we are pushed back on the defensive with little more to offer than indignation.

So the omens are not good. But I never thought they where. I would expect more of this sort of thing to come up in the years to come. Once equality in terms of advantaging women has been exhausted as a strategy then the agenda will move beyond this to full female domination and dominion.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Novaseeker January 13, 2010 at 07:42

Of course.

Equality was never the real goal — the advancement of women was, and is, the real goal of the feminist/women’s movement. Equality was an intermediate goal, to be sure, but once that was reached, it was no longer satisfactory, as the movement continues to press ahead on behalf of women — the goal being complete domination. This will be peddled as being a good thing because, after all, men have messed up the world, and the world deserves a second chance at “doing it right” the way a woman would do it. In other words, the world needs to be run by women, because men have messed up the world. This argument is already being made with a straight face, in fact. Dee Dee Myers, Clinton’s former press secretary, wrote a book during the last U.S. Presidential campaign entitled ‘Why Women Should Rule The World’. The argument is already being made, folks. It’s the next phase of the women’s movement — beyond equality, which was at best an interim goal, and on towards utter domination of the species. Unlikely they will achieve that, due to the men at the right end of the curve, but they won’t stop trying as long as the civilization exists.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Charles Martel January 13, 2010 at 07:59

@Novaseeker

This is why it’s just amazingly stupid for rank and file type men to support feminism as they do — but many men are just amazingly stupid.

It’s not stupidity as much as it is they just haven’t made the connections between feminism and its consequences. It takes a while to put all the pieces together.

That’s why I think that, despite criticism from some quarters that it’s all just talk, sites like The Spearhead do an amazing and useful job. Each individual man has to figure it out by himself, and the information here and elsewhere in the manosphere accelerates that process.

The accelerating declining marriage rate projections in my article on The End of Marriage may not be mathematically defensible, but I think there’s a good chance that the marriage strike meme may reach criticality and Western men may suddenly abandon marriage en masse.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Paul January 13, 2010 at 08:09

Novoseeker the trouble I have with all of this is that I can see that some men have indeed arguably messed up the world. I know that I have never been a part of this messing up, and there has never been a person of power who I did not feel was totally alien and different from me.

I am as hostile to the men of power as I am to feminist. I also don’t see these men of power as being some how intrinsically endowed by being to the right of any bell curve. I don’t think Gordon Brown, Obama or Bush are some how the most gifted men of their generation. If they have exceptional qualities it is in the size of their ego and their determination to impose their wills. But these thing are not qualities to be admired but despised.

Our leader are not the Einsteins of the political world. Probably no such thing exists. There is more to despise and fight against other than women. I wish to resist both the female bitches and the male bastards.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Jean January 13, 2010 at 08:17

Caliph,
Did you mean to foment a revolution? It would need to be a global civil war, you understand – and for this action to be successful, the “elites” must be rooted out and killed. Difficult, under the best of circumstances. The only other possibility will be that these elites will become victims of their own con (unlikely to be soon, but impossible to avoid, too – entropy always wins.)

Something (unpleasant) to think about.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Firepower January 13, 2010 at 09:18

Welmer on January 12, 2010

In a stunning about face Sweden plans to remove gender quotas for admissions to university and college programs because not enough women are getting accepted to certain courses.

Meh. Sweden suddenly “discovers” Affirmative Action is societal code for government sanctioned discrimination – like whites are victimized by Affirmative Action here.

Especially white MALES.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Eman January 13, 2010 at 10:51

For Welmer – “Women may think of men as primitive, but new research indicates that the Y chromosome – the thing that makes a man male – is evolving far faster than the rest of the human genetic code.

A new study comparing the Y chromosomes from humans and chimpanzees, our nearest living relatives, show that they are about 30 percent different. That is far greater than the 2 percent difference between the rest of the human genetic code and that of the chimp’s, according to a study appearing online Wednesday in the journal Nature.

These changes occurred in the last 6 million years or so, relatively recently when it comes to evolution.

“The Y chromosome appears to be the most rapidly evolving of the human chromosomes,” said study co-author Dr. David Page, director of the prestigious Whitehead Institute in Cambridge and a professor of biology at MIT. “It’s an almost ongoing churning of gene reconstruction. It’s like a house that’s constantly being rebuilt.” – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/13/are-men-more-evolved-than_n_421919.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Eman January 13, 2010 at 11:08

“The fickle Y chromosome” – http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100113/full/463149a.html

“Are Men More Evolved Than Women?” – http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/13/are-men-more-evolved-than_n_421919.html

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Nemo January 13, 2010 at 19:44

I think that women might outsmart themselves, so to speak.

They have constructed an intricate web of laws that regulate admissions to college, athletics in college, employment, distribution of government contracts, welfare in the form of free food and housing, tax rebates, etc. to favor women and implicitly disfavor men. Add in family law and courts that actually punish men who marry and reward women for cuckoldry, and the system’s extreme anti-male bias becomes painfully obvious.

As a result, women now are about 58-60% of all college students and are approaching 50% of all workers. They collect vast sums in child support and can get alimony for *life* in California after ten years of marriage.

Is this Nirvana? Nyet.

Men pay about 80% of all taxes and constitute 100% of all ex-husbands. Women have essentially been redistributing wealth from men to themselves via the government, divorce settlements and alimony, and child support.

As long as there were lots of wealthy men holding good jobs, this strategy works. The problem is that wealthy men do not automatically beget more wealthy men. In a patriarchy, fathers tend to mold their sons so that they become patriarchs who pay lots of taxes, marry, and have sons of their own.

The patriarchy is dead. The matriarchy is a carrion-eater that is eating what’s left of the carcass of the pre-existing patriarchy. Once the bones are picked clean, the buzzards will starve.

Look at Detroit. In about half a century it went from the zenith of economic bliss to the nadir of poverty. That’s the future of America under feminism. Women will win control of the nation and will drive it straight down into the ground. Men are already re-assessing their options under the new rules that discriminate against them and make education, marriage, and employment far more difficult. From a male point of view, the system is now an obstacle to be bypassed, not a solution to their problems.

Once the smoke clears, I think that we will go back to the old days before the American Revolution, where men taught each other a trade under an apprenticeship system and anybody could become a professional, such as a lawyer, by simply “reading the law” and passing a tough but fair exam.

Women will devalue credentials such as diplomas to the point that they mean next to nothing, so men will find a way to effectively scrap the entire system and start anew.

Look at Detroit: there’s nothing left to tax, the population has dropped by 60%, and half of the remainder is illiterate. They MUST start anew there because there isn’t any “there” left.

Soon, everywhere in the US will be a mini-Detroit.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Paul January 14, 2010 at 01:18

I do hope you are correct NEMO. We should do all in our power to push things to destruction.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Scattered January 14, 2010 at 08:25

Arguing whether this or that supposed ‘anti-discrimination’ policy is not justified is irrelevant. Your arguing within a marxist frame, your perpetuating the notion that certain thoughts are crimes. Why the hell are you not fighting for your right to discriminate? I have the right to think in a racist or sexist manner as I also have the right to only engage in contracts with others based on their gender or race. That is a part of the price of freedom.

When women were given the lawful rights of men 90 or so years ago feminism was done. Equality is meaningless and sociological statistic’s, bell curve’s and inter-gender dynamics no matter how true are irrelevant.

Any action you take can and will be warped for the purpose of their own agenda, if you go on strike (whatever that maybe) you will be made to look childish, if you use violence you prove their belief in the beast that is man, if flee you are irresponsible, if you do nothing you are a slave and if you reason you’ll be met with unsubstantiated statistic’s, ridicule and fictitious history. As long as you argue within their socialist reality you can never win unless you lay waste to all your principles of honor and of reason. How many women have you seen that revel in the belief that they are superior to men, those PC comments that just ooze baseless female supremacy. How can you compete when everything in their reality is interpreted in such a way as to satisfy the ego, whether as a victim, a humanitarian, a mother or a champion against the patriarchy. Any action can be justified and there is nothing that cannot be rationalized in such a way as to maintain good emotions.

Any optimism is irrational, without exception all great civilizations died once it liberated its women this realization was published 80 years ago but still history repeats itself.

The degeneration of our culture is everywhere and it keeps getting worse. People keep saying “Live life in the ‘present’.” or “Whats the point in living if your not having ‘fun’.” and what is the net result of these new age (feminine) philosophy’s? A mass of people who have no notion of the past and no thought for the future in which their sole objective in life is to have ‘fun’, to indulge their primal urges. Anything they know is spoon fed bullshit and whats more they think this bullshit is all they need to know.

Everyone has their precious little opinions, anything they don’t understand they can simply dislike and what they dislike can be ignored. Just like people, ideas and art are given no fair trial in the minds of others. Not only is mediocrity everywhere it is downright glorified, put up a barely adequate rendition of fur elise on youtube and you’ll get a 5 star rating accompanied by comments like “Omg ur sooo awsm i wish i cud play lik that”.

How many more millions live today that have the economic surplus to better themselves. How many more great men should we have than what we had before.

Sorry for the rant.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Firepower January 14, 2010 at 09:19

Nemo

Once the smoke clears, I think that we will go back to the old days before the American Revolution, where men taught each other a trade…

Remember who/what had to be neutralized in order to create those safe cottages for teaching.

Remember what causes that smoke in the first place.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
Porky Domesticus January 15, 2010 at 01:47

Women are easier to dominate than men, and as long as this is the case neither the Swedes nor the Yanks will do anything about the female majority in university, after all the end result of such inequality is a middle class that will be easier to dominate, and that’s good news for the powers-that-be.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
Mason January 15, 2010 at 15:37

@Novaseeker (post #3) — stellar response. Expanding on your explanation of this conception that “physical dominance = oppression” — I find it so laughable. Psychological dominance seems to be the common factor in abuse.

A classic example: the famous MMA cagefighter Don Frye (now mostly retired) has expressed in multiple interviews that no man he has faced — in the ring or out of it — has ever scared him the way one of his exes did. The implication is that she was batshit crazy; he obliquely referred to being cold-cocked upside the head with a shovel. This is one of the most legendarily tough fighters in the world, who was afraid of his woman because she was self-destructive and unstable.

Another legendary fighter, Mirko “Cro-Cop” Filipovic, has made similar comments about unhinged women being far more threatening than any man he’s fought in the ring.

Even Floyd Mayweather said – after Arturo Gatti was found asphyxiated in Brazil, which may or may not have been at the hands of his wife – that he is paranoid about living with a woman because of stories like these.

Turning away from crazy women to crazy men: in 2003 an enormous bouncer named Dana Blake (described as 6-foot-5, 350-pounds) was stabbed to death in a NYC bar by a Vietnamese-American after being ejected for violating a smoking ban.

This idea that being physically powerful is, in and of itself, inherently threatening is truly moronic. Anyone who has watched the movie “Trainspotting” would realize that a confrontation with sweet-natured jock Tommy is far preferable to one with the diminutive psychopath Begbie.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Snark January 15, 2010 at 15:40

Begbie still gives me nightmares.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
gunner451 February 2, 2010 at 19:03

Nemo,

I agree that Detroit is our future, however, I’m not so sure that we’ll be able to dig our way out of that hole. What you propose requires that there are men left that have the capacity and desire to begin to move back up. I believe that once you’ve hit the Detroit type bottom there is no more human capital left, it is just survival at that level on into the future, kind of like most of Africa is today. I guess my only hope is that I’m not around to see it hit bottom but given that rate of decay that’s not likely either.

Who would have thought that the greatest civilization the world has seen would be brought low by a bunch of over weight middle aged hags? Somewhere the Devil has to be laughing his ass off.

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0
Jake Sully July 23, 2010 at 13:53

When female are in domination this is a good thing. When male are maginalised this is a good thing. Now who can say hosnestly (yes girls I put this word for you) that feminism is not all about FEMALE SUPREMACY?

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0
!!SPARTA!! July 11, 2012 at 01:06

lolol A feminist linked me to this article as her example of discrimination against women…in freaking Sweden! *cries laughing*
lol seriously??

Wonder what made her think that was a good idea…

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Leave a Comment

{ 3 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: