More and more men in our society are becoming unglued, and the results have not been pretty in my neck of the woods. Following Christopher Monfort’s alleged Halloween assassination of a policeman on the same block I used to live on (here I am at the scene of the crime some years before it happened), Maurice Clemmons gunned down four officers in the Lakewood Massacre.
Those two incidents were enough to mark 2009 as an exceptionally bad year for local police, but this morning two more cops were shot in a domestic violence call near Eatonville, a town in rural Pierce County, just west of Mt. Rainier National Park. The suspect in the shootings, David Edward Crable, was shot and killed at the scene, but he left one deputy in critical condition and the other with a serious gunshot wound. Officer Kent Mundell, who was shot multiple times, is on life support. It doesn’t look good for him.
Crable had been in trouble with the law over domestic issues on and off for a couple years. So far, these seem to have revolved mainly around his immediate family, including his daughter, brother and mother. Could he have grown up in a single-mother household? If so, this would put him in the same company as the previous two cop-shooters.
These attacks are of interest to me because the three shooters are all of my generation, which was the first test case for our new, matriarchal society. There is little doubt that the men involved are extreme examples, Clemmons having shown signs of psychosis prior to killing four police officers and Crable having a history of heavy drinking combined with domestic violence and a tendency to make threats, but it is often the borderline cases that indicate the trends.
The incidents raise the question of what relationship marginalized men will have to the state in a highly feminized, matriarchal society. Washington state – and Western Washington in particular – is perhaps the most feminized region in the entire United States. Feminism is unquestioned at the highest and lowest levels of authority, and unlike feminist regimes in Europe, Washington retains the draconian American methods for dealing with men, including imprisonment for poverty (CS arrears jailings), violent arrests, social shaming and the like.
The attacks on police, I suspect, are inchoate manifestations of a general enmity between a certain class of men and the state. If the economic situation does not improve and social trends continue along the lines of the previous three or four decades, we ought to expect more and more of these tragedies.
{ 38 comments… read them below or add one }
Welmer, may I suggest you read Ernest Callenbach’s 1975 novel “Ecotopia”, which gave a highly approving view of what was to come? In this paradise of environmental sustainability and sensitivity (highly approved by the author), what was formerly Washington, Oregon, and northern California splits off from the US, resorting to nuclear blackmail to maintain its independence. Of course, women are in complete and total control.
As I’ve said before, it won’t be long before the men you describe turn their anger on those in power rather resort to random violence, which sends no message.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You can only push people so hard, especially when they’ve got the lethal cocktail of attachment, respect and control issues common with fatherless boys. We’ll see lots more of this.
Be interesting which group snaps first: the thug-spawn, or the frustrated betas.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@krauser
Thug spawn will snap first and more often, but the frustrated beta snaps will be far more horrific. Specially after the beta realize that they can kill in more ways than a gun.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A man shoots other people, and you blame women for it?
Lol….
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Interesting too that we continue to insist on calling these tragedies ‘killings’, ‘murders’ and ‘massacres’, but never use the word ‘suicide’ – even though nearly all these guys end up dead, and would have seen it coming.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Jamie, you’re a moron. He’s not blaming anyone or attributing a cause, just speculating about the possibility of a common thread among these incidents.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yeah, Jamie, I’d be interested in knowing where you got that out of the article.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I have no sympathy for cops. None at all. They know what is going on and they are choosing the side of killing and oppressing the common man. Sure, there might be a few good cops left. Fuck them. Period. The time for being ‘nice’ has passed. They KNOW this.
Gentlemen. The rules in a common law country are very simple. To arrest your a cop REQUIRES that he has seen you commit a crime or have an affidavit in hand accusing you of committing a crime, or have a statement from someone willing to write such an affidavit. If the cop does not have one of these he/she may not arrest you. If you know how legislation works he/she can not arrest you under legislation. A cop (peace officer) attempting to arrest you without one of these criteria is committing assault. If she/he is carrying a gun it is assault with a deadly weapon.
I have been thinking about noticing Kevin Rudd and Robert McClelland in Australia that they publicly and clearly tell all people in Australia and the peace officers what the difference is between a law and a statute or that they, personally, be held responsible for the crimes committed by peace officers in their employ for the ignorance of the peace officer because of the refusal of their employer to inform them.
This is a simple demand. Inform your peace officers of their obligations or face the consequences of refusing to do so. Gentlemen. It is only when we incarcerate those who are perverting the course of justice that we are going to see some change. Those who are oppressing men are not going to ‘change’ any more than the mafia at a request to ‘please stop oppressing us’.
More and more men are going to become ‘unravelled’ because they have been abused. Women are so stupid they think abusing men is a good idea. It is stupid. An abused man is a very, very dangerous man. I am a good example of such.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I agree with Globalman!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Globalman, I had to edit that last post of yours quite heavily.
I have had plenty of experience with the police due to false accusations, etc., and the police have been nothing but helpful and understanding because I was in control, honest and straightforward with them. Of course, it helped that my ex told wild and contradictory stories, but I am very grateful for the restraint and professionalism of the police I have had to deal with. In fact, I have heard from policemen themselves that they are frequently subjected to the exact same thing I and countless other men in divorce/custody disputes have gone through, and in their case it is often more severe, because they get paid by the government, which makes it very easy to extract the maximum from them. When cops get divorced they are truly stuck.
There’s a good chance that I will have to deal with the police again in the future, given the nature of my ex and her boyfriend, and I run this site. Therefore, any calls for assaulting or killing cops here are very strictly forbidden. Not only do I sympathize with the cops I know personally, I also do not need a reputation as someone who tolerates calls for anti-police terrorism — especially here in Western Washington, where police have been targeted three times in less than three months, killing at least five and wounding three. This is deadly serious business.
So please, exercise some restraint in your comments.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Education is the key.
We must educate young boys as to what is going on. Especially young boys that are fatherless.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Must educate the men on who makes the laws that allow woman to turn them into slave and yea give them names and addresses.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Crable had been in trouble with the law ”
Cops are not ‘the law’. They are peace officers.
In videos recently in the UK cops have screamed at people
“I am the law”.
No. They are not. Not even close.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
To be fair though I mean how much easier could it get in us to get rich?
The governement has done a good job in that respect.
If your willing to work 84 hours a week you can be free in a few years.
No degree required.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Basically while in us and before you have a fat bank account stay away from woman and you won’t have a problem with the police.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“So far, these seem to have revolved mainly around his immediate family, including his daughter, brother and mother. Could he have grown up in a single-mother household? If so, this would put him in the same company as the previous two cop-shooters.”
“The incidents raise the question of what relationship marginalized men will have to the state in a highly feminized, matriarchal society. ”
These are probably the parts that I can pinpoint blaming women for the shootings.
Yep.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Paranoia on your part. Or perhaps a guilty conscience?
Noting correlations and raising questions has nothing to do with blame.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Welmer December 22, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Welmer, it is your site and you are welcome to edit me as you see fit. Today, many police officers know what they are doing. I have no sympathy fo them.
I recently sat with the Registrar of the Australian Federal Magistrates Court of Australia in Parramatta and I explained the law vs statutes to him. I then followed up with detailed documentation of the differences. He claimed to be a ‘good man’. He claimed to be ‘a patriot’. And when the evidence of what was going on was placed before him he went ‘quiet’. These men, who claim to be our servants, know full well the crimes they are supporting against men. When are men going to say “Enough is enough” to these men who are committing crimes?
The ‘peace officers’ we have in our society have taken a vow to uphold the ‘law of the land’. They are breaking this vow and they are serving as the “policy enforcement officers” of a privately held run for profit company known as their ‘country’. The abuse of men can only occur because these guys are willing to go into a mans house with guns drawn and to kidnap him unlawfully. The common law is clear. Such peace officers can be lawfully killed. That is not ‘negative’ or ‘abusive’ it is a fact of common law. Should facts be censored? I don’t think so.
It is the COPs duty to educate himself as to his powers and rights. If he does not do that he should be shot and killed for his ignorance. Period.
How many men are going to have to die before men wake up and read a dictionary like Blacks Law Dictionary and learn for themselves the difference between a law and a statute? Between law and legislation? How many men are going to have to kill themselves from the abuse from FC before other men actually start DOING something to stop it? Quite a few more, it would seem.
We are leading up to christmas. Many men will be without their children, UNLAWFULLY. These unlawful acts are carried out by men who are drunk on their own power. Many of them COPs. “I was just following orders” went out of fashion with the Nazis. Cops have every obligation to know and understand the law. “Ignorance of the law is NO EXCUSE” and “ALL MEN ARE EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW”. Every day cops kill men and no-one raises an eyebrow. Why?
Yes. Many cops are good men. And these good men should be blowing the whistle no matter what the cost.
I have risked my life, my freedom, my business, my money, my time and my effort and put my loved ones in danger to take on the ‘powers that be’. They know who I am. I have written to the PM and AG of Australia noticing them, in my own name, with my own address, that members of the law society of Australia, according to the Geneva Convention, seem to be lawfully subject to ‘lawful assassination’. These guys can, and might, throw me in cage and call me ‘cazy’. When are other men going to start educating themselves and say “Hey, enough is enough, cops can not do what they are doing.” ?
Gents, it is time to learn the difference between a ‘peace officer’ and a ‘policy enforcement officer’. It’s time to learn what your rights are. It’s time to learn how to claim and defend your rights. You don’t know how to claim and defend your rights? You don’t deserve to have any.
Sure, some cops are getting killed. But far more men are dying every day from the abuse handed them. Who do men here wish to stand behind? Corrupt cops or innocent men doing their best? We live in a crappy world at the moment. And there are precious few of us actually working to make it better. The rest are ‘talking’.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If anything, the article infers that the blame be placed on the society/government we live in.
You know – the one that encourages single-mother households; the same type of household that is documented to have higher probability of “problem children.” And, since its obvious (or – is it?) that women didn’t create this situation all by themselves – men enabled it, as well.
Pretty far reach to say welmer is “blaming women for the shootings.”
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
One of my friends in Chicago quit the police ten years before his pension when he discovered his partner was a hitman, and he realized that there was no one in authority he could trust to report this – and live.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Welmer, I 110% stand behind any cop/peace officer who learns and understands his role as a ‘peace officer’. When I was a boy I was taught to respect such men. Indeed, one of my team mates in my football team had a dad who was a cop and he was much respected by the men and the kids alike.
So…Check it out. As a ‘peace officer’ cops take a very specific vow in most countries or states. And in the former british empire is usually includes ‘uphold the peace’ and ‘uphold the law of the land’ by which is meant ‘common law’ not ‘statutes and legislation’.
But where is the ‘crime’ when a man is thrown into jail for ‘not paying arrears’. I have not paid one cent in ‘interim support’ or ‘child support’ and yet they have not issued an ‘arrest warrant’ or taken from me my passport. I am prrof positive that all this ‘arrears’ bullshit is just that. Tell me, how many men around the world are in jail because they have not ‘paid arrears’? How many men have had their passport taken from them because of ‘arrears’? If you are well informed the answer is ‘lots’.
Men complain about ‘feminism’. Yet a man like me comes along and demonstrates, as one example, that alimony/child support is not lawful and can not be enforced and other men are not interested? One man points out that cops have obligations to understand the laws they are enforcing and other men are not intersted? Are we going to “piece the shield of ignorance” or are we going to perpetuate it? I love your site. I think it’s great. And I am as committed as anyone to ‘piercing the shield of ignorance’.
This article is about cops. How about we even start with documenting what a ‘peace officer’ is and what a ‘policy enforcement officer for a private company is’. Because ‘cops’ claim to be both today. They operate as ‘policy enforcement officers’ and then claim the privileges of ‘peace officers’. Robert Menard has a lot to say about this and he is 110% correct.
Sorry. If you think I am without sympathy for cops getting killed then lets look for the ‘sympathy’ for those thousands of men committing suicide from the abuse they are receiving from the FC. Where is the ‘sympathy’ for them? Who is speaking up for them and their violated rights? Or are these men not important enough yet to be talking about? Many more good men who did nothing wrong kill themselves than there are cops being killed. It’s time for all good men to educate themselves a little.
You know, Welmer, it is an uphill battle to even get people to recognise that there are lots of men who kill themselves from the abuses of cops and FC let alone do anything about it. No-one wants to talk about these men. It’s like they don’t exist. Men want to talk about anything BUT those men who kill themselves from the abuses of FC. No subject is too obscure that it can be used as ‘running interference’ for men who are killing themselves from the abuses of FC. Check it out. How many articles can you find about the ‘suicide epidemic’ that now pervades the western world? Almost none.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Women worse at parking than men, study shows
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Cop killings are put in a different category than Sodini-style killings of women.
In fact, it is surprising how rare Sodini-style killings are.
Welmer, I hope there are ways you can get a few Seattle cops to read your articles, so that they put 2 and 2 together. If even a few COPS see the indirect ramifications of feminism, then they become less willing to be minions of it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
One thing about Sodini that doesn’t add up is that the 3 worst things that feminism can do to a man did not happen to him :
1) Ruination through divorce, CS = alimony = slavery
2) Cuckoldry
3) False rape charge
None of those three happened to Sodini. He was getting the same amount of sex as most married men his age, minus the nagging and expenditures.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
But did Sodini KNOW that? Did he KNOW that in all those Happy Couples where Happiness Is Required(at least for the man) that the men are miserable?
He bought the lie. Like most other Western men.
Why shouldn’t he? He had never had any personal experience otherwise.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Jamie, you’re still a moron. All your syllogisms prove is the feminist principle that the truth is whatever she believes it to be.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Welmer,
I think it is far too generous to call this a ‘matriarchal’ society. There is nothing motherly, nurturing, etc. about it.
It is militant female supremacy. Nothing more.
So the opposite of ‘Patriarchal’ is not ‘Matriarchal’, but ‘feminized’. Someone who actually is a Matriarch in a family sense, like Sarah Palin, is deeply hated by female supremacists/leftists.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’m interested in your technique about avoiding arrears, Globalman. This is a potential “game changer” (not referring to seduction game) that could really turn the family courts inside out and upside down.
I see some general guidelines on how you’re doing it, but I’d like to see a few more minutia to this technique. Looking it all up in Black’s Law dictionary seems a bit… unreliable that I’ll find out how to accomplish this (not that I need to, but I’d love to instruct others) because I have no background in law, I’m a product of the public school system, I may have to take yet another red pill to understand how the entire system works, or this branch of it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A new post, with some relevance to this article. But you may not like my reasoning..
http://dissention.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/escorts-are-a-better-deal-04/
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I don’t see that prospect of men fighting back as a tradjedy even when that fighting is done with guns. I never see the shooting of cops as anything to get upset about. I have no regard for them and their deaths cause me no distress at all. In fact I am quite pleased.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Globalman
“Men complain about ‘feminism’. Yet a man like me comes along and demonstrates, as one example, that alimony/child support is not lawful and can not be enforced and other men are not interested? One man points out that cops have obligations to understand the laws they are enforcing and other men are not intersted? Are we going to “piece the shield of ignorance” or are we going to perpetuate it? I love your site. I think it’s great. And I am as committed as anyone to ‘piercing the shield of ignorance’.”
I have watched over the years as ‘laws’ have been created in direct contrast with the bill of rights. I absolutely agree that a false control paradigm of following ever changing policies and procedures have been pushed, and from the small amount of research I’ve done, I believe you are right on the money. I have no desire to kill anyone–but If it comes down to taking me away because I violated a procedure, etc. , this is a violation of the Universal Law Of Allowance which is above man’s law and what common law must be based on. I don’t go out looking for confrontations, but anyone who believes they have the right to take me out of my home and lock me up is going to be facing a man who absolutely does not fear death, and would prefer to die fighting rather than kneeling to ignorance and stupidity. I believe this to fall under self-defense, and if they are not following true laws (common law-which seems to fall under my universal rights to freedom I will defend my self ompletely. I don’t believe in going out to physically avenge my anger, and will not do it. However, allow me to use an analogy, the ‘mandatory’ vaccinations. These vaccinations contain thimerosol/squalene and this is would be a direct attack o my right to be free from attack with a deadly weapon. In tht particular case, I will inject them with another metal using a much higher caliber. Whether the thug wants money or to steal my freedom. I would be very interested in showing men that this law exists, and is the only one which can be enforced. I want all men to not onl learn this, but enforce it. Thi does not make me a crazy cop murderer. It just makes me someone wanting to live life with a basic sense of balance and justice…..
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If Washington state is the feminized state you’ve described it to be, and I have no reason to doubt that, is it safe to presume that they have a mandatory arrest law any time domestic violence is alleged? Would it also be safe to assume that they still use the widely debunked Duluth model that holds that men are always considered the perpetrator in such incidents? If so, knowing nothing more, it would seem that in this latest incident the killing of these cops could be completely justifiable.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I have to agree with Welmer that Washington State is indeed a hotbed of Feminism, I personally live In Seattle myself and as such I bear witness to the practices of Ultra Masculine Women and Feminised Men on a daily basis. I’ve lived here for about five years now and I’m starting to see cracks in the day to day for real men that I never saw when I came here. The loss of manufacturing in the Seattle, Kent, Tukwila, Everett, and Tacoma region has left a lot of men out of work, and marginalised their power with the women that they live or are involved with. The rise of Queer Power here in Seattle matched together with the in effectual policies of Feminist government continue to oppress Men here and it astounds me to no avail how men vote these people into office that have goals contrary to their own needs. Men here have unequal resources to help them if they are victims of abuse and and as such I could see how they could see police officers as tools of their oppression. Personally I think its wrong to commit a murder or even attempt to, so I will not excuse these men or their behaviour, but I also believe that men need to stand up against who is really in charge and that is a Matriarchal government that really doesn’t care about Men or Women , just only for the continual status quo.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Globalman, I had to edit that last post of yours quite heavily.
… any calls for assaulting or killing cops here are very strictly forbidden. …
So please, exercise some restraint in your comments.”
Globalman, I encourage you to get your own website, where you can exercise editorial control as you see fit. I would find such a website more interesting than the spearhead.
Incidentally, Globalman, I’ve started reading up on those legal issues that you have linked to, such as common law, etc.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The police protect politicians and the criminal class from citizens’ justice. They deserve no sympathy from any of us.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
While this piece is about cops in the US ,here in the UK the police are rapidly becoming both hated and feared,
Hated because they have stopped being the guardians of law and order and have morphed into the para-military wing of the labour party,everything they do is guided by left wing principles even when these fly in the face of plain common sense.Proper crimes are left uninvestigated while the police spend there time harrasing anyone who dares to speak out against the insane PC laws that now dominate public life,had your house burgled? been attacked in the street and the police are just not interested but call the prophet mohammed a murderous paedophile in public and you will be dragged in for interrogation and re-education.
Feared because they are more and more breaking the very laws they are meant to uphold,witness the killings of Jean Charles DeMenezies and Ian Tomlinson,so far not one officer has had to answer for these deaths in court,police drivers who cause fatal accidents will almost always get away with it ,also have a look at the case of ex soldier Paul Clarke who found a sawn off shotgun at the bottom of his garden,when he took it to the police,they arrested HIM,although the bad publicity and public fury directed at the police and judiciary has ensured that he escaped with a suspended sentence,he does now have a criminal record.
add to this the general high handedness and arrogance of the police when dealing with the public its not at all surprising that the police are now generally referred to not as bobbies but as as the Stasi.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Meanwhile women get off for murder (literally).
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sued a cop…won that one.1st 4th violation….stopped ymca from evicting homeless men illegally…won that one…talked a man who had just robbed me…into splitting his freshly robbed me so we eat that night…won that one…sued a senator over sex discrimination (male to male chilvary bias )…settled out of court…won that one….have won countless tresspassing charges…driving charges…landlord/tenant episodes…tort/debt/bankrupcy/victim robbery intervention cases…all seen outcomes in my favor and only one lose in my favor because I took an interest in myself , educated myself,( called talked & read example cases online ) GAMBLED…WENT TO COURT…Took a solid-fortified-laymans position on things , presented to those ideas in a humble-respectable manor based on easy access to knowlege of very simple laws..and won everytime..Unbeleavable ! …………Esspecially dose in my shitty luck…saved documents on every case , so I wouldn’t forget my time in vagas (courts ) you can’t win in vagas unless you know the game at hand-rules , dealer at table(judge) , odds…and what the potental winning/loses might be…and you just might induce yourself into a wickedly fun life of an activim-istic-ecto-lecto-lavatorioist
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
{ 2 trackbacks }