I would greatly appreciate it if you could post links and references which would lead those interested towards a better diet. Maybe a Spearhead article is in order.

I struggle to keep the weight and energy levels I want and I know it has a lot to do with my diet versus my metabolism in my 30’s. (Versus teens or 20’s when the body seems capable of handling anything, even drinking binges and 24 hour work sessions, with ease.)

Are you sure about that? I’m a big proponent of both coal gasification and the development of U.S. shale oil resources. But in both cases there’s a good 5-10 year lag between the day we say “let’s do it” and the day when we can produce most of the oil we consume. And that’s assuming no substantial challenges from environmentalists.

If the dollar were to collapse the price of oil to the U.S. could shoot up to $200 a barrel, $300 a barrel, or more in a very short span of time. We don’t have a single alternative technology or fuel source which can be ramped up to meet our demand within a comparable time frame.

I think you misunderstood and were “short ont he foresight”.

Most guy’s don’t have game.
Most guy’s aren’t the natural ten’s and the tens who can commit, you can bet will ALL be taken ..as will the male 9’s..when the shit hits the fan.

So yeah, I can see some left behind dimes and female 9’s having trouble finding mates unless they are willing to “marry down”.

Yea, the really hot chicks actually are gonna find themselves in something of a bind too, as they vie for the hot boys along with the middling chicks who are between 4 and 7 on the attractiveness scale. The reason? Simple – most guys would rather hookup with the “surething” chick, and they tend to be the middling gals, than go for broke (and literally go broke – remember, MOST Men don’t get laid, and don’t have Game either) on the Certified Dime. So, this means that Dimes will actually get little action – they made out better during what some call “Marriage 1.0″. Now that the SMP has been deregulated, they’ll take a considerable hit – much like Nordstrom’s takes a hit when Walmart sets up shop accross the street.

Pure unadulterated rubbish.

Dimes see plenty of action if they want it. As much as they want from as high quality as they want. What they find harder than before is getting a male dime to commit.

Long on rhetoric. Short on analysis and insight.

LOL! This reminds me of a line by the Bernadette Peters character in “The Jerk” – “It’s not the money I’m going to miss, it’s all the STUFF we could buy with it.”

If you aren’t doing foreign + domestic simultaneously, you must be having a budget problem. Then again, since you can convince many US college coeds to sleep with you by spending $500 on dates, I can understand how a man with a great job in the US might not be able to afford to fly to East Europe because he’s spending a lot on dating in the US.

Read http://www.OnlineDatingRights.com to check out the facts. Wikipedia is run by federally funded feminist organizations so you’ll get their spin there (they keep deleting when someone notes that 1000 US wives are murdered per year where they’ve stated that IMBRA was necessary because 2 foreign women were murdered in a 15 year period).

For VAWA and IMBRA, all we need is one American citizen to take the time to write something on the back of a napkin and present it to a federal judge. The judge will have to deliberate.

We just need to find one person who would use their real name.

Most US males have no idea that, to defend their rights, at least one out of 140 million of them has to, now and then, do that.

What is shocking, and what is the reason why the feminists have established such a gynocracy, is that US men don’t seem to understand that federal courts exist for them to complain in, without a lawyer if necessary. But the $8000 to use a lawyer is the easy part. The hard part is finding one volunteer.

Now I’ve heard that, when forced, US men do go to family court for stupid minor reasons like saving their own little house or winning visitation rights for their own little kids. But family court takes its authority from the fact that the federal Supreme Court hasn’t been asked to declare fundamental male rights the way feminists intelligently got Roe vs Wade past the Supreme Court giving them a somewhat questionable new “right”.

Going to family court doesn’t challenge VAWA and federal funding for women’s shelters directly which is what we should be doing. Going to court to save your own house is too little too late, it isn’t preemptive and its always on the defensive. Plus…it isn’t FEDERAL.

The federal courts don’t know what men look like. Men don’t seem to know how to approach federal courts. It would be as easy as walking into one at 9AM after writing something on a breakfast napkin at the local diner…but stupidity reigns…or the alpha males who would challenge laws are too tied up with their time and reputations in their own corporate activities.

Where are the retired military alpha males who could challenge laws? We just need the warm body and the willingness to use the real name. The corporate executives among us can actually write the complaint itself.

Let’s look at the sorry history of federal MRA challenges:

1) Woman in PA tries to get a rapist federally charged. Supreme Court conservatives decide rape isn’t a federal offense and overturn that part of VAWA but only for the narrow sense that a rapist can’t be tried in fed court. Democrat justices wanted to try and convict the rapist and send him to federal prison. Notice that, in this case, there was NO MAN challenging VAWA in a declaratory challenge which is what should have happened because he could have asked for a broader decision.

2) Woman in Colorado wanted the fed government to force the State of Colorado under VAWA to pay her $Millions because they failed to stop her stalker ex-husband from killing their children. Conservative SC justices said that the fed gov has no Constitutional right to punish a state for not stopping domestic violence. Dem justices were jumping at the bit to punish Colorado. She lost the case. But it should have been a man challenging VAWA because she was asking for a narrow decision and not what a man could have asked for if he said “do you feds think you have authority over my relationships with women and any physical activity that occurs within state lines”.

3) There were 2 IMBRA challenges mentioned above but they were by dating agencies that secretly wanted to lose their cases…others might tell you that they were simply incompetent. In any event, the plaintiffs completely ignored 100s of great arguments given at the above forum.

4) Roy Den Hollander challenged VAWA in 2008 saying that his Russian wife had been a stripper all along and he had been used for her to get into the country to continue her stripper career. When writing his challenge, Roy refused to work with any MRA who knew what they were talking about. He seemed like a paranoid loner. The judge laughed him out of court, acting like he’d been a fool (which he was) for marrying a stripper (the liberal judge also seemed to have the Marxist feminist attitude that the girl was just trying to get ahead in life and it was smart of her to exploit the kind of guy they think themselves try to exploit women).

Roy then failed to appeal, which is probably for the best because he wouldn’t work with anyone smart who could have helped him with his arguments.

Challenging laws requires having a brain and, sadly, even most MRAs just can’t process info logically enough to make an airtight case that would force the Supreme Court to definitively overturn VAWA and IMBRA…even though the logic and the facts are staring us all in the face.

Talk of “Game” and PUA and MRA is meaningless as long as these laws make a mockery of marriage and establish the precedent that the US federal government has the right to stand between us and women and say “background check please”.

Or, hopefully, join the ranks of the MRA and start to speak up.
(Wishful thinking, I know, but then again…:)

It is kinda sad isn’t it? I have said it before, and I’ll say it again……..feminism’s biggest (real) consequence, is going to be many lonely, middle-aged, past-fertility women in about 10-15 more years. I wouldn’t be suprised if almost 20-out-of-a-100 women does not wind up this way near larger cities. Childless and alone, past fertility, with only marginal-pump-n-dump value for desperate men left, facing retirement and monetary problems all alone. They will be invisible.