Women’s Forum Naming Suggestions

“Bitches Brew”

I’d like to add a forum for women at the new bulletin board we’ve set up. Why? Because there are billions of women out there, and somehow we’ve got to make peace with them.

I think they should try and make peace with us.

“Witches View”
“The Divorce Agenda”
“The Last Stand”
“The Naggin´Thread”
“The Pregnant Kitchenworker”
The Soulpiercing Stilletoes”
“The Harpy´s Tongue”
“The Girlie Gremlins”

Barefoot Pregnant Kitchen since that’s where all you mean bad “misogynists” want all women to be.

“Their Place”, because that’s where we put them in.

Ratched and Clank…Oh, no, that won´t do..

kis, we were thinking y’all’d want Mike’s Hard Lemonade.

She Ain’t What She Used to Be

I’ll second Zed’s suggetion of the estrogen pool.

“I’m going to try to establish the benchmark for the nadir of bad taste”

Perhaps we should take this to the forums?

XX without the XXX

Arbitrary

Read it as if it was an order !

(deleting all of the above…)

XXanadu

zed, the men’s sphere has jumped the shark.

What the hell happened to you?

This is like looney leftist land around here.

No. There are many, many other resources for what you’re describing. An occasional (or even ongoing) link to them is sufficient. Do one thing well, not many things poorly. This is for men.

Might I suggest “Chloe”. Firstly, at five characters, it is short, and easy to mention typographically. Second, it is a proper female name; don’t know why I like that fact, but I do. Third, it comes from the Greek χλόη (khlóē), meaning “young green shoot”. Most post-modern womanhood has become a vast weedy thicket, choking out society, and needing a thorough burn-off. If we are hoping for “green shoots” in gender relations, an auspicious name can do little harm, and perhaps some good.

Just my $0.03 (inflation adjusted).

Bhetti’s place.

Ummm, ok. Something else.

Girlgame at Spearhead; Women Dissenting from Feminism

the female salon.

The Vagina Dialogues

I haven’t been around The Spearhead very long, but I do enjoy it and I learn so much here. If that is enough for me to participate in the women’s forum naming, may I say I love these three, and would be hard pressed to choose between them.

Their Place
Here Be Dragons
XXanadu

OOOORRRR….how about just “BITCHIN”

“march of the red army”

The Vagina Omnilogues (credit, tarl)
Medusa’s Mirror (credit, dead white males)
The Horror, The Horror (nod, milius and coppola)
Please Dont Go There

yes i’m aware they are lame thanks, four of chic noir’s are better

The Progressive House of Skankopolis …. it does ring

MND
SYG
TBM
AM
NG

””””””’But first I’ll extend them the respect of asking for their opinion on how to proceed with this.

Women should have their own place, and I’d like to know how they would define that. Suggestions are appreciated.
””””””

This might be your first problem with woman and men. You ask the woman what to name their forum then don’t make a guys forum then just launch a regualar forum for everyone. At least your in line with how the west treats them he he he

Names:
- Submit FORUM (or ‘Submission FORUM’)

Oh, I like this one too lol:

You WILL Get Clawed

Nice one Ray

kis, we were thinking y’all’d want Mike’s Hard Lemonade.

WTF? Just because I have a pussy doesn’t mean I have to drink like one. Beer please. Maybe a gin and tonic on a hot day, but you can save the girlie drinks with their pansy umbrellas and fruity garnishes for the brainless bimbettes humping Roissy’s leg.

“Smells like fish.”

Tastes like chicken.

Or, to combine it with Hestia’s suggestion “BITCHIN in the Kitchen!”

Shit, Zed, if I want to do that, I’ll just stay home.

“Smells like fish in here”, huh? Well, I suppose that has a certain poetic flair.

Me, if I hadn’t been busy getting dinner on the table I might have suggested “The Pink Taco Palace”. But the name’s fine as it is.

I never did get this “space of their own” type stuff. What’s the point? Either they are here because they want to be part of the conversation or they don’t… What purpose would it serve? Are they “separate but equal” even in MRA-spheres?

Is there nowhere women don’t “deserve” special treatment because they’re “far more precious than jewels”?

Jeezus, really?

How does this NOT make MRA’s look like hypocritical Paternalists?

my opinion also factory, thus my sorry attempts at humor

isn’t Woman’s Special Space supposed to be the one they already share with men? leaving aside that we now live in A Woman’s Nation?

chuckly thread tho!

I never did get this “space of their own” type stuff. What’s the point? Either they are here because they want to be part of the conversation or they don’t… What purpose would it serve? Are they “separate but equal” even in MRA-spheres?

Is there nowhere women don’t “deserve” special treatment because they’re “far more precious than jewels”?

Jeezus, really?

How does this NOT make MRA’s look like hypocritical Paternalists?

Actually, I think women having a space to discuss relevant women’s issues is a good idea. Feminism said that men did not need their own space, and look at where that got us.

Remember, we are anti feminism, not anti woman. Thankfully, those few men that are anti woman will quickly remove themselves from the gene pool, the same way rabid feminists fail to pass on their genes.

-Heathen

”””””’Remember, we are anti feminism, not anti woman. Thankfully, those few men that are anti woman will quickly remove themselves from the gene pool, the same way rabid feminists fail to pass on their genes.

-Heathen

”””””””””’
Roger but in making a womans space and not a mens space you show your subservience to woman.

I have read nothing here.

Title alone…

You’re shitting me right?

Are you subservient to your dog if you build it a doghouse?

Apparently so.

LOL.

“Because there are billions of women out there, and somehow we’ve got to make peace with them.”

I disagree. We do not need to ‘make peace’ with women. I think any such notion is complete crap. All us men need to do is do what we have always done. Assert our authority. Men TELL women what to do and to be happy about it. Period. If the woman does not like that she can go try and pander to some mangina who will ‘make peace’ with her who will be such a spineless whimp that she will soon lose all respect for him and she will soon be seeking that ‘alpha’ that gets her all wet again. I am living proof that trying to ‘make peace’ with a woman is stupid and futile. It’s like negotiating with Adolf Hitler. You do not ‘make peace’ with those who attack you unjustifably. You destroy their power base and make them your servants as punishment for not acting honourably. The only women I am now interested in are those prepared to serve my needs. Period.

Women have had more than enough opportunity to ‘make peace’. Now they can feel the could shoulder of indifference and dis-engagement. If they do not come back cap in hand begging to be our servants and insist on prosecution their war against us men might just turn nasty and retaliate. This would be very bad for women.

I was one who was told that it was somehow ‘right’ to give women a chance to be ‘equal’ and to treat them as such even though they never, ever earned that right. I have always been well aware that women were vastly inferior but hey, they want the opportunity to ’step up’ who am I to stand in their way? Well, 27 years later, I have seen how women ’step up’ to the challenge of being ‘equal’ with me in particular and men in general. They are crap at it. They whine like little children, cry at the drop of a hat, refuse to do their job, lie about everything and anything and, in general, have made a complete nuisance of themselves in communising the work force, exploding the size of ‘guvment’ and generally destroyed our society. Well done ladies.

Since women started pushing for ‘feminism’ the quality of life in the western world has fallen because feminism is code for communism which means take money from men and give it to women. They call this slavery ’social justice’ because it sounds so much better than “I am too lazy to work so I will pop out a few bastard kids I got from a guy whos name I didn’t even bother to find out so the guvment will give me money to sit on my arse and ‘raise’ kids.”

The only viable use of women is to make love with and have sex with. I find them very beautiful and very attractive. But that does not make them ‘equal’. It makes the hot ones a ‘well rounded entertainment package’ with virtually no other significant use to me personally. ‘Make peace’ with these people? Don’t make me laugh. I will treat women as vastly inferior and merely make love with and have sex with the ones I find really hot for as long as I can. The rest of them can go to hell. There is not a job in the world that a woman does that would not be better done by a man. If women wanted to be ‘equal’ then they had to ’step up’ and not merely whine and complain when anyone pointed out how lousy they were at their job. The women I deal with now are lovely. Just what I want. And there is an endless supply of them. Leave the feminised women to their cats and vibrators.

“why should we not work with sympathetic women”
Because they are children and the vast majority are incapable of the level of thinking of men.

Another reason that women should be banned from involvment as us men challenge and (with luck) defeat the Illuminati is that women are masters of deception and will infiltrate our ranks and destroy it from within. They are like termites or white ants. Women are expert at creating division and jealousies between men. Try checking out the men are better than women forums and look at the posts by Shushi and Chick. All they have done is troll those forums acting all ‘nice and friendly’ being attention whores and feminists and creating such a lot of crap posts that good me said f*** it and left and we created our own private mans forum no women allowed. And you know what? A forum with no women allowed AT ALL is a blessed relief.

Women are ‘better communicators’? Don’t make me laugh. My ex talked to her mother for an hour every week for 20 years. If she was such a good ‘communicator’ she would have gotten the message across. Calling women ‘better communicators’ is like calling a hummber ‘better at using petrol’. Women are crap communicators. Women are crap at everything they do except produce babies which is not to their credit because that is what they were genetically engineered to do. Men even make better parents than mothers.

We are not in a battle with women. We are in a battle with powerful men. Women are the ‘useful idiots’ being used by powerful men. Those women who wish to contribute? They can sit on de jour juries and judge and punish women who have committed crimes against men. There is no statute of limitations on perjury or kidnapping. Any woman who will jail another woman for committing perjury or kidnapping will be worth a tiny little bit of respect. We can go back through all the divorces and jail all those women who committed perjury via false allegations or kidnapped a mans children. Until women have done this I would be of the opinion they are not genuine in their willingness to live in a land governed by laws. Period. Any woman who will not sit in a de jour jury and punish women who commit crimes against men gets no respect from me. It’s up to women do decide if a crime is still a crime when committed by a woman against a man. When my ex is sitting in jail for her crimes against me I might actually listen to a womans opinion. Apart from that? Tough. Why would I be interested in a womans opinion when she condones perjury and kidnapping?

I have talked to lots of bleeding heart “I want to help women”. When I say. “Are you willing to jail a woman who commits perjury?” their so called ‘willingness to help’ immediately fades. It is all very well for them to talk about ‘being supportive of men’ but to actually punish a woman for a crime? Well, that is just going too far…;-) I mean women can’t actually be held accountable for their actions. They are children.

As for a forum for women? My vote, and I made this clear, was to ban women all together. They have a forum. The echo chamber known as feministing. So if they are given a place to talk separately here at speahead that would be great. I could refuse to go there. My opinion is that women are totally worthless in the war against the Illuminati. I am yet to see any evidence to the contrary.

“why should we not work with sympathetic women”
Because they are children and the vast majority are incapable of the level of thinking of men.

I as a parent, have a certain kind of influence over my children. The nature of this influence is very different from the influence other children have over my children. Sometimes these influences complement each other, but sometimes they are in opposition. This is why choosing a child’s peer group is an important factor in determining who they grow up to be.

The same is true of women. We men have certain influence. Other women have a different kind of influence. Some in the PUA community refer to this influence as “social proof”. If there are women out there willing to exert that influence on men’s behalf, they are welcome here.

Our goal is, or should be, to build a better society, not simply a male only society, which I can promise you will be just as unsustainable as this one.

Another reason that women should be banned from involvment as us men challenge and (with luck) defeat the Illuminati is that women are masters of deception and will infiltrate our ranks and destroy it from within. They are like termites or white ants. Women are expert at creating division and jealousies between men.

This may be true, but why fight the Illuminati (if that is who you beleive the struggle is against) with one hand tied behind your back? If those weapons are available to us, and are being used against us, why not pick them up?

And you know what? A forum with no women allowed AT ALL is a blessed relief.

No one has proposed that there should be no forums solely for men, but that we should also provide a forum where women can post about their own views and issues. I would go so far as to suggest that you may see fewer women posting an the “men only” forums if they had somewhere to put their own comments.

We are not in a battle with women. We are in a battle with powerful men. Women are the ‘useful idiots’ being used by powerful men. Those women who wish to contribute? They can sit on de jour juries and judge and punish women who have committed crimes against men. There is no statute of limitations on perjury or kidnapping. Any woman who will jail another woman for committing perjury or kidnapping will be worth a tiny little bit of respect. We can go back through all the divorces and jail all those women who committed perjury via false allegations or kidnapped a mans children.

You would ask women to do all that and begrudge them even a forum to call their own? Not what I would call an effective incentive program.

I could refuse to go there. My opinion is that women are totally worthless in the war against the Illuminati. I am yet to see any evidence to the contrary.

Yet according to your own comments, you see them as effective weapons of the so called Illuminati. Either they are useful, and we can make use of them, or they are not useful, and we need not fear them.

-Heathen

On a negative note, I recall MND’s thriving forum disintegrate completely – and then abandoned – when Mike insisted that both sides of the fence should be represented.

He had lost the feeling of ‘us’ and ‘them’ among his supporters.

MRAs then abandoned his site in droves and went elsewhere.

The site never fully recovered.

If you try to be everything to everybody, you end up being nobody.

I would also point out that honoured MRAs like Zed and Ray also abandoned MND at this point in time.

So anyway…

Bio determinism and cause and effect autonomic reflex, female sexual value male redundancy and the like…

http://seanmaccloud.blogspot.com/2009_09_01_archive.html

@Zed

My comments were only in reference to Spearhead – not to the world out there.

“The great thing about fighting against any idea that is just flat out wrong is that it will eventually fail due to its own wrongheadedness. “

Yes, but if the forces promoting the “flat-wrong” ideas are strong enough, then those “flat-wrong” ideas can last a thousand years.

I don’t want to wait that long before I see feminism dethroned.

LOL!

This post kind of embodies the ideal exchange: I like this kind of relationship where you ask for our input but in the end are the decider, as well as making a special place for women without being asked.

With regards to naming. I shall be slightly overanalytic about this. Other very feminist places online have called themselves many things e.g. The Bitchery. I’m personally not quite happy being in an environment where I am by default emphasising and/or fighting my faults i.e. somehow having to prove myself to men or automatically being ascribed masculine or aggressive qualities rather than celeberate what it means to be a good woman. I will not put up with a frame given to me that women as a gender are inherently flawed when we are simply different: our qualities can be strengths and weaknesses depending on the scenario and zeitgeist. There is a lot of (justified) suspicion about women in The Spearhead and no doubt this will find it’s way to a woman’s forum; this doesn’t need to be reflected in the name because hopefully the name is a hope for what women will be, rather than a joke that I can see many will misinterpret.

What’s in a name? In the name’s the definition. What kind of women are we, as anti-feminists? We come from different backgrounds: we have girls who’re gaining awareness that we have been the biggest losers in the New World Order — where men have lost touch with their masculinity, where men are slowly losing faith in family, where women pathologise their own gender role because its viewed as playing into the hands of the patriarchy (patriarchy viewed as a social construct and a bad one — rather than the natural and best way things are done) where women are unhappier than men because they are trying to do too many things of which some are against their nature, and so, failing at all. We have discontented women, women who are forever looking for love in the wrong places (externally, rather than understanding its a habit, an action, an internal force) and not understanding their own natures and needs, and what drives and motivates their own behaviours so they enter a cycle where this is worsened and worsened. Misery loves company and the misery inflicted upon men is that: let me ask you this, these women who have victimised men, are they happier than you are?

A false rape charge, what does it do for the case of a real rape victim?

Anyone can see e.g. Welmer would make a woman a wonderful husband and yet — here he is — utterly rejecting the institution: no more, he says.

Men who would consider marriage aren’t marrying, marriages which should’ve lasted aren’t lasting, relationships which are disastrous and shouldn’t happen are occcuring, relationships which do last are more likely to be filled with fights, nagging and bitterness than ever before: she wants and demands more, more, more and cannot be satisfied nor has anyone told her to be satisfied nor is she encouraged or forced to be satisfied. We are happier if we are encouraged to do the best with what we have, rather than always thinking of the option of abandoning it.

Well, the way things are and the way they are heading (e.g. Mancession) is that women are increasingly left alone to inadequately be in charge. A man is not allowed to be invested, not allowed to be employed, not allowed to contribute to his child’s upbringing, not allowed to be respected, not allowed to enjoy a woman for being a woman and so his input is nil, his power is taken away, the relationship between the genders is full of apology — the male is forced to be distanced — and that means she is not getting help, input, human partnership that she needs.

Society is made up of a family, a sense of belonging. It needs both good men and women. It starts with the couple, extends to neighbours, extends to the community and this is a system that a woman in particular cannot tolerate. We are social animals and a man is better adapted to going his own way than a woman ever was.

What are we, female anti-feminists, then? We are advocates of the hearth and home (for happier women who still love family and still are baby-crazy if you look at the nature most women’s careers are put on hold, for a better cooperative society), we are celebrants of women being women rather than trying to be men, we are not radical anti-feminists who believe in taking away a woman’s ambition to be all that she can be but we do believe she musn’t feel that that is what she must be, we are the bastions of reason in a mad world that may just be waking up with this new generation. We are women who understand the landscape of ourselves, the good, the bad, the dissonance.

We have honestly looked into the internal mirror: we have seen ourselves and what our wants actually are. We want men to be fathers, companions, guides, workers and partners in building the best world we can, together.

That is what I’d like to be captured in a name. Us as feminine, as yin, as complement and important, as self-aware. A woman gazing at the mirror, knowing that the title of ‘woman’ is meaningless without the title of ‘man’ to match her, the title of ‘woman’ which radical feminism has done everything to implicitly and even explicitly denigrate and make meaningless (through both what it advocates — masculinising women — and the male reactions to its misandry and pedestalisation of women; we must accept our weaknesses and love them just as we accept them in men and love them — this is what is healthy — rather than pretend they do not exist in women and exaggerate their existence in men).

If there is one word to reclaim, it is the word of feminism: this is advocating for change that is truly in every woman’s interest. We do not have our rights unless we earn them and these rights are meaningless unless we remain true to our natures.

I reclaim The Nature of Women: our petticoats, our cooking spoons, our family, our femininity, our enchantments, our nurturing natures, our temptations, our submissiveness, our rebelliousness, our passion, our protectiveness, our many variations, our mystery, our pragmatism, our sexuality, our respect for authority, our love of the community, our intense loyalty.

We are Cleopatra, Florence Nightingale, Umm Imarra, Boudicca, Khadija, Marie Curie, Aisha, Helen of Troy, Zenobia.

How to capture that in a name? Well, perhaps someone — perhaps a man could do the honour of extending the helping hand — can come up with something, because all my attempts seem inadequate.

“Spear Sheath”

Interesting move.

PINpricK
The Javelin (Man – Spear, Woman – Javelin)
The Shaft – although I think ‘Globalman’ would agree with ‘The Pit’, hehe.
Pink Asylum
The Pink Steamroller
Loony Bin
FemGate

Jokes aside, it’ll initially seem like subservience, but the purpose/end product is real. More women that are brought to the attention of this site and men’s hardship, the better. Messages need to get out into the everyday. Informed lady heads out there secures a damage limitation for unsuspecting brothers/betas.

So men have always argued about being gagged. So why not return the favour? Because by giving a forum it shows many a man’s true nature of giving woman a chance to speak. Men have an agenda and a forum is an invite for women to engage in a respectful manner, controlled, I think. It’s like going to a divorce counsellor, you’re both sat there and you have to behave yourself, reason things out. You’re not in the environment of your home gripping a saucepan.

That is what is needed, calm, reasoned debate.

Give it probation but I can still feel a storm brewing (call the forum Thunder Bay? ). You the boss. I hope it will provide a testing ground for everyone to debate more logic rather than emotion. An essential requirement.

Or call it ‘Spear’s Court’, where women state their case, lol!

Welmer,

All that I ask, is that you remember that your naming this forum for women that are on your side. Women who see the destruction of this nation at the hands of feminism. And I don’t wont those wretched women thinking that forum is for them.

Please name it something really pretty and feminine….:0)

Kimberly

I’m excited to find out what you have in mind…God I have no life…lol

How about http://www.feministing.com ?

Come on now…you know you love it! Besides…you talk big but when are you going to continue that blog of yours? hmmmmmmm….Booooooooooooooooooo

“more precious than jewels” is a reframe. See the 31st proverb.

Perhaps this forum should emphise the finer qualities that women should aspire to in partnership with men.

I would suggest “Shieldmaidens”. Not only does it complement the overall imagry of the The Spearhead, but it also recognises that these women are also at risk when they speak out against feminism.

Sheild and spear, side by side, as they are meant to be.

-Heathen

Heathen…I love that idea!

Heathen November 12, 2009 at 5:06 am
“If there are women out there willing to exert that influence on men’s behalf, they are welcome here.”
Really? You presume to speak for all men here? You must be a mangina. How about you try expressing your opinion and let other men express their opinion? And by the way, how many women exert their opinion on mens behalf….for all intents and purposes in the west, zero.

“Our goal is, or should be, to build a better society, not simply a male only society”
‘Our goal’? Who is ‘our’? You are the authorised representative of some group? Who are they? When did they decide that building a better society is ‘our goal’? Why would I be bothered building a society that is ‘better’ by some obscure definition? My goals are to get drunk, get laid, get fed and do it all again as often as possible before I die. I have absolutely no concerns about a ‘better society’. The plan is for society to be totally collapsed and I don’t have too many problems with that either.

“which I can promise you will be just as unsustainable as this one.”
Really, you have some proof of this? Or are you just trying to make pie in the sky promises that you have no way of proving or backing up. Sounds like the second to me.

“I would go so far as to suggest that you may see fewer women posting an the “men only” forums if they had somewhere to put their own comments.”
You are so ignorant you don’t know there are thousand and thousands of forums for wimmin only? And I mean wimmin of both genders. Try google. You will find there are masses and masses of womens forums who will ban men the instant they express an opposing opinion. Let the women talk in those echo chambers. If the spearhead keeps entertaining stupid and ignorant women I will leave. I have listened to stupid, ignorant, lying decietful women for 32 years. I really don’t need any more of their crap opinions to waste my life. And every second any man spends listening to a womans stupid and igorant opinion is a second he loses to learn how to defend his own life. Men who spend time listening to womens opinions deserve to be killed by the Illuminati for their ignorance of the real threat at hand.

“You would ask women to do all that and begrudge them even a forum to call their own? Not what I would call an effective incentive program.”
So women are such crap that they need an ‘incentive program’ to punish crime and run a society based on laws? Gee, that makes them pretty crappy doesn’t it? And did I say I begrudge them a forum? No, I didn’t. That is a lie you made up and attributed to me. That is how women argue. You must have been taught to ‘think’ by a woman. How women ‘think’ is that they express an opinion….period…nothing else needed…..if women want to be given a seat at the foot of the mens table what they will do is punish women for crimes they have committed. Just like men punish men for crimes committed every day. Women are so pathetic that they will not punish a crime committed by a woman.

“Yet according to your own comments, you see them as effective weapons of the so called Illuminati. Either they are useful, and we can make use of them, or they are not useful, and we need not fear them.”
The term is “useful idiots”. Any group of people can be incited to hatred if the Illuminati throw enough propaganda at them without opposing opinion. But I guess you never heard of Nazi Germany. With women their ability to process information is so limited they only need repetition and it is much easier to program them to incite hatred and have them destroy their society by attacking men. Now that they are programmed to hatred of men in the west it will not be possible to remove this programming in any timeframe that makes sense so we can safely ignore them and just work on dealing with the real problem….the Illuminati who wish to destroy our society and bring in their New World Order. Whether women have yet another place to express their useless opinions will make no difference to the outcome of the New World Order. In short, women are irrelevant.

“And every second any man spends listening to a womans stupid and igorant opinion is a second he loses to learn how to defend his own life. Men who spend time listening to womens opinions deserve to be killed by the Illuminati for their ignorance of the real threat at hand. ”

It’s small moments like this zed that I really need your page.

@Kimski November 12, 2009 at 7:28 am

The 5th Column

Nice.

Is it to be used against the enemy or us?

Such is always the story of pussy…

Shieldmaidens

Great name Heathen, I like it alot I think it fits. More than the current name, “Smells Like Fish in Here”…..*rolls eyes*.

Sean

I´m a man…Does that answer your question?

“If there are women out there willing to exert that influence on men’s behalf, they are welcome here.”
Really? You presume to speak for all men here?

Not at all. I welcome them, and therefore, by definition, they are welcome here. It only takes one. I would note, however, that I do not seem to be alone in my opinion.

You must be a mangina.

Shaming language. Nice. I expect that sort of thing from women and other feminists, but not from supposedly liberated men. Methinks you are perhaps a prisoner of your own hate.

And by the way, how many women exert their opinion on mens behalf….for all intents and purposes in the west, zero.

After attempting to take me to task for expressing my opinion as a statement of fact, I am sure that you would not make such a (prima facie) ludicrous statement without a reputable scientific study to back it up. I would very much appreciate a link to this study that shows that absolutely zero women in the west “exert their opinion” (whatever that means) for the benefit of men.

“Our goal is, or should be, to build a better society, not simply a male only society”
‘Our goal’? Who is ‘our’? You are the authorised representative of some group? Who are they?

“They” are the group of enlightened men coalecsing around the Spearhead that dream of a better society. I assumed you were one of “us”. My mistake.

My goals are to get drunk, get laid, get fed and do it all again as often as possible before I die. I have absolutely no concerns about a ‘better society’. The plan is for society to be totally collapsed and I don’t have too many problems with that either.

In the real world, while wearing the face that I am forced to wear, I would have to be careful not to judge your moral character against my own internal values lest I oppress you.

Here however, I am able to tell you that I think you are a sad, pathetic excuse for a man, and that you are wallowing in your own self inflicted victimhood. It is men like you that made feminists feel like they could take over. After all, when the bar is set so low…

“which I can promise you will be just as unsustainable as this one.”
Really, you have some proof of this? Or are you just trying to make pie in the sky promises that you have no way of proving or backing up. Sounds like the second to me.

Actually, I will hold you up as proof. You are a man with no investment in society. Your conversation is unpleasant and your life goals contribute nothing to society. I would guess that nobody will really miss you when you are gone. As many of the authors on this website have pointed out, western civilization thrived once it found a way to give men an investment in society. That investment was a genetic legacy founded on a stable relationship with a, wait for it… woman.

If the spearhead keeps entertaining stupid and ignorant women I will leave.

I think this is one of the strongest arguements for a women’s forum that I have heard yet.

Men who spend time listening to womens opinions deserve to be killed by the Illuminati for their ignorance of the real threat at hand.

Aren’t you a gem. And, of course, unless you are on a mass murder spree that I don’t know about, you have completely failed to put your money where your mouth is. Thus, you either don’t believe what you posted (you are full of crap), or you lack the courage of your convictions (you are gutless).

So women are such crap that they need an ‘incentive program’ to punish crime and run a society based on laws?

Everyone needs an incentive. It’s called rational living.

The term is “useful idiots”. Any group of people can be incited to hatred if the Illuminati throw enough propaganda at them

You don’t look in mirrors much, do you?

But I guess you never heard of Nazi Germany.

You lose the internet. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

In short, women are irrelevant.

I suspect, that if you had been born a woman, you would have made an excellent feminist.

-Heathen

I suppose I see the essential flaw in having a woman’s forum on The Spreahead is the idea that women can help or do us any good at all. What short memories we all have. Was it not only last week that Glen Sacks was explaining why he spoke to feminist. He thought there could be dialogue and communication. He was wrong and admits it. He fell into a trap. Similarly here there is a false assumption in thinking that women can offer us anything even if they call themselves anti feminists. Really there is no such thing. All this saddens me as the Trojan Horse at the gates and once inside the spearhead will be blunted.

5th column, right?

Zed,

Your page is the one I’m talking about. I didn’t realize Geo cities pulled the free pages. Alright, I’ll go harass Welmer.

Oh and ladies of Spearhead please email me, kimberlyslament@gmail.com

I don’t want that forum being named, “Smells Like Fish in Here”

And if I get no emails, well guys……I don’t know what to say. I’d rather not have a forum at all if it’s named that.

SHIELDMAIDENS, ffs Zed! Come on, women and vote on the damn thing! Just post your vote here. No secret ballots, no holding hands and singing Kumbaya. Do it. Doooooo itttttt!

GOOD GOD, WOMAN, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT NAMING A DAMN FORUM, NOT NEGOTIATING NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well, hell, I’d have been fine with “Smells like fish in here” (call me crazy, but I thought it had a certain charm), but you all wanted us to pick a good name. I’ve picked one. I don’t think we women should be penalized because Heathen lives in a different time zone than I do and posted it first, if that’s what you’re getting at.

Besides, I don’t want to be independent from men. I want us to be side by side, fighting and toiling together. Being “independent” as feminists define it is like masturbating. It might get the job done, but it’s not as fulfilling as the real thing with another living, breathing human being.

Here’s another suggestion: “Double Agents” We’re anti-feminist women, we’re supposed to go in as moles and unravel the whole thing from the inside. Or how about “Ethical Traitors”?

Hestia too.

I’m going, I’m going. Jeez, I just woke up here…

‘Heathen’ is a hi-jacker. It is obvious. Look at how much energy he spends on this without posting _on anything else_.

Does that say that he knows “our” interests and has them at heart?

“Heathen” as a nome d’net is not like an anti christian heathen who is fed up with western sappiness (christian sentiment) that enables the lie-ing and censoring parts of liberalism. It is the, “I don’t like-no-patriarchal-god heathen”.

“Look at how much energy he spends on this without posting _on anything else_.”

Truth in advertising…

If there are more than 2 “maidens” in the whole lot of you I will be surprised.

How about shieldcrones?

Oh, that’s mean. LOL

@Kimski
Glad to hear it! The six books of the original Dune series are amazing, and I recommend reading at least the first three books if you liked the televised version.

Hope

There´s a lot to be said about danish translators…And most of it aint good!!

Still, make no mistake. I’ve adopted Western society just as it has adopted me. This is my world now.

If there are more than 2 “maidens” in the whole lot of you I will be surprised.

LOL , very true but the idea of the spear and the shield together was what I liked.
(and she puzzed and she puzzed…..)

“Shall I triple the number of words already being used to make sure that I throw in enough qualifiers, disclaimers, and weasel words that no amount of overzealous parsing of what I have to say could possibly be even marginally construed to not be perfectly, exactly, precisely, 100% accurate in each and every possible permutation which might occur in an infinitely variable and uncertain universe which so far in human history has defied exact and precise description despite the combined efforts of millions of academics, philosophers, and even the occasional drunk – the fundamental uncertainty of which we must, for the time being at least, simply consign to “the great unknown”?

Holy run-on sentence, Batman! That’s $0.25 into the grammar jar!

Although a name seems to already have been chosen, I remember two girls I knew back in college who had, hanging in the entrance of their apartment, a Maxi-pad with a jiffy-marker message reading: “Welcome to our pad.”

The X chromosomes.

The-ShieldMaiden is good

I like Ironmaidens

Or I’ll take “Rainbows and Unicorns” or “Tea party”

does this all mean that The Progressive House of Skankopolis has been rejected?

I rather fancy “The Target” myself. After all, spearheads do need something at which to aim and to penetrate, so to speak.

If I were choosing, I would choose The Distaff.

Just FYI I stated well above I was against the fem forum too. I simply acknowledged right above here that “motif development” was the way to go generally for naming.

[Menu /Edit/Find --search-- a page for easy scrolling. Firefox is good browser.]

Soooo, what is the lesson Welmer and Zed?

Maybe feminists thought men would benefit from their movement just as you thought women would benefit from yours.

Maybe now you know why we are here at this point in time.

It was a power struggle that had to be faced and when enough peace without war occurred, the time was right. It is already being solved because it needed to be solved and time was on its side.

To Rod

You want to make peace with woman?
How can you make peace with a population of beings, who on an instinctive level wouldn’t ever recognize the average male as being a person.

You are right.

It is not your generation to make peace. Your generation will make a peace and your generation will be a part of a war in its own ‘meant to be’ way. It is just life.

That’s why everyone who has power are going for the children and why they have always gone for the children since humans began making life different from the animals. “Give me a child till he is seven and I will make a man of him” has been passed down right through biblical times and is still being passed down.

Those whose job it is to make a difference have already forgotten about you and me. We are just statistical information for what to do and not to do.

Why should women have their own forum here? Unless it is a place to which you can banish them for too many asinine comments? I suggest that you worry less about kow-towing to chicks and making them feel special and more about continuing the great work that you have been doing thus far.

Let the women speak here like anyone else and when they expose themselves as fools, let them reap their reward for it… just like any man would.

“Heard But Not Seen”
The Vertical Smile
Mutterings from the Kitchen
After the Men Speak

Bhetti
“Kitchen references”

Oh, thank you very much, Bhetti!-You just gave me a whole new list of things to worry about !!!

Bhetti, Kathy, other women, perhaps you can answer my question. Why do women sometimes seem happy to insult their own sex, especially their own anatomy? I am genuinely puzzled.

Last night, a young girl stopped me at a bus stop and told me a really anti-woman joke, along the lines of “fishy smells”. I think she thought she had shocked a grown man, but what really surprised me was that she would tell an anti-female joke, as a female.

I don’t get it. Any hints?

Hmm, bit over the top when a young girl goes up to a total stranger and tells such jokes , David.
Speaking for myself, I don’t make anti female jokes. I don’t make anti male jokes. I just make jokes.

My husband has a mate, who whenever he heard of a man about to be married, would exclaim quite solemnly (whilst shaking his head) “Another victim of the bearded clam!”

Never ever thought of it as anti- female.

Damn funny though.

Still cracks me up when I think about it

Rod, do you mean fanny as in butt? ( American slang)
or fanny as in vagina? ( Aussie slang)

I would like to note:
Despite the enormous enjoyment I am having coming up with naughty names for the Female Forum.
I am aware that the woman contributing to this site are a different breed from the misanderist usual, us men have all been born and bred under.
I do personally believe mens rights should be run by men for the welfare of men and boys.
Woman get in the way because they are not men don’t have our values, and most have only their own interests at heart whether they know it or not.
Our problem is most common men are brainwashed against us, on the behalf of a lot woman.
Males are and have always been inspired into action by females. This needs to change, we need to value ourselves and our kind too.
Woman have a place and an opinion in our movement but it is not at the center, where we need to be.
And if some female has a problem with our delight in disrespecting woman as
group, then maybe she should have a thought to how we have been treated in our lives by the ruthless, greedy, cruel and selfish gang mentality of many females and their sympathizes. Not to mention their total lack of accountability in everything.
So sorry to the woman who are reasonable capable and decent adults.
Rod.

I would suggest “Shieldmaidens”. Not only does it complement the overall imagry of the The Spearhead, but it also recognises that these women are also at risk when they speak out against feminism.

I second this. I like the Germanic/Celtic imagery.

Oh I know I promised to leave, but if you make a woman’s forum may I come back? I tried taking it to the feminists but “there be dragons there” and none of my posts even show up. Even the mundane ones like “Men are people too.” are shot down immediately.

You’ll be relieved to know that I concentrate on my own blog now (that was a good idea, BTW) so I won’t have much time to annoy you with my married-bliss comments.

Truce?

Hope November 12, 2009 at 9:59 am
“A wise man wrote, fear is the mind-killer. Another wise man told me, fear and hatred of the Illuminati may be part of what gives them power.”
Your wise man is correct. Fear is a mind killer and hatred is a very negative emotion. And the Illuminati use fear to control people. Example? Paying income tax is voluntary in all former british colonies. Yet, if you exercise your lawful right not to volunteer they call you a ‘tax cheat’ and attempt to use shaming tactics on you. If that isn’t enough then they send their blue gun thugs around to arrest you and their corrupt courts to run a charade that ends with you in jail. All for not ‘volunteering’ to pay taxes. The fear of being jailed keeps the sheeple paying income tax ‘voluntarily’.

Men who know me know I fear nothing and no-one and don’t hate anyone or anything. Indeed, many men who know me ask me if I am not worried about getting thrown in jail for what I am doing. I reply that I’m certain I am going to be thrown in jail for a while and would be surprised not to be. Why would I fear being thrown in jail? Only those of extremely low intellectual capacity would take what I am saying as ‘fear’ or ‘hatred’. Mostly they turn out to be wimmin. With a name like ‘Hope’ which is gender neutral I can’t tell if you are a woman or not.

When people are committing genocide those who would oppose them (like me) have to stand up and be counted. Or are you not aware of the ongoing program of genocide going on around the world? Maybe you agree with it? The Illuminati are already killing tens of millions of people a year. And if you knew that they have just infected more than 1 M people in the Ukraine and have caused 300+ deaths yet this have been completely kept out of western media you might start to understand the extent of the problem…but hey…you know more than me…right?

Oh..in case you didn’t know….swine flu vaccine shots are causing lots of women to miscarry. I so laughed when I read that. I was reading a blog of all these wimmin talking about how totally shattered they were they miscarried after their swine flu shot. Boo hoo. What do these wimmin have to say about men killing themselves from the abuse they receive in family court? Nothing. Well, when you replace your ‘provider and protector’ husband with a corrupt guvment and you allow them to pump poison into your body because you are too stupid to do your own research and you have a miscarriage WHO IS RESPONSIBLE? Answer. NEVER A WOMAN. The wimmin on the blog all blamed ’someone else’ for their miscarriage. Women are children. They can’t be responsible for anything. Not even for allowing a criminal guvment to pump poison into their bodies that kills their baby. Nope. Not even THAT is the responsibility of a woman. Well done ladies.. I first really got how women could not care less about their children when my ex showed more concern at how she would be perceived by the nursing staff at a hospital than she was about saving her own sons like from cancer. Just like these women couldn’t care less about the baby growing inside them to do their research and find out swine flu vaccines are poison. People are screaming from the rafters the swine flu vaccine is not safe and would these wimmin go find that out? Nope.

Hi. Regular reader. Female .

I’m ignoring the disparaging comments about women up there to instead focus on the wisdom of Welmer’s argument. Your rational thought is not unappreciated.

Who are the women in your life that you don’t hate, forum? Your mother? A sister? A daughter?
Maybe something like “Feminine Allies?”