I think what the author has forgotten is the case of Islamisation. Living in the UK, now in Scotland, having lived in London for 16 years, I saw a dramatic change in demographics there. From moving down at the start, inner city schools were still predominantly white (just) with an almost equal number of Afro Caribbean. Now however the majority are Muslim Asian mixed with Afro Caribbean and a minimum of whites.

I did predict that Islamisation of the West will occur over 6 years ago. More and more western males will also embrace Islam as it will give them protection and power over women whom in Islam are “half that of a man.”

The future looks grim for the white male, christianity, agnosticism, atheism and other non Muslim faiths. You speak of anarchy, but that will not happen when Islam is the majority.
However, one thing’s for sure, either way with Islamisation or not feminism is f*cked and worse still, women really don’t know just how big a hole their digging for themselves. The horrors we hear of the sex slave trade of Eastern European women will happen to them and there will be no one prepared to protect them. We will certainly see the rise of misogyny on a tremendous scale as no forgiveness will be given, to a once pampered, protected and respected part of the fairer sex within the west, who had it all, we gave a yard and they took a mile. One thing goes without saying and that is if you f*ck with nature, nature will only do the same back. The bond has been broken between male and female. The respect for women is disappearing faster than a chicken in Ethiopia. Being a man who once put women on a pedestal, I’m now the complete opposite (although certainly not a misogynist) someone, who’d never go to the aid of a “damsel in distress.” Why? Well they’ve created the state, so let the state protect them. They’ll find that an even more impossible event in the future, as more and more men will no longer feel the need to treat a part of society that treats them like sh*t.

Women are about to enter a new dark age, either with or without Islamisation and I hate to say it, but they’ll have created it and brought it tumbling down on top of them like a tonne of bricks, themselves.

I think that one of the big possibilities of the undeniable forces he’s discussing is something like… ugh. England right now. My read is, [for them] that the uphill struggle is so unappealing that men just… give up. OR rather, that not enough men keep up the faith in the old system to make a significant difference in the tide of apathy and shame.

I like to think that there are enough men (mentors *and* youth) here in the States who didn’t take the red pill to avoid this problem, but… I don’t really have a good source for demographics to make a judgment either way. But when I factor in the damage done by the Public Schools in this country, and the wild success of the “Teenager” construct…. I admit my optimism flags a bit.
The LCD (Lowest Common Denominator) assumptions seem to be very seductive for no reason I can comprehend.

Perhaps when the gravy train runs out they will decide to do something sensible rather than run the streets red with blood.
Damned Bread and Circuses!

I agree with your conclusions re Jewish women. I’m lucky to have found one that’s a six sigma in terms of not (or I should say for complete accuracy) no longer believing in the feminist drivel.

I also coined the term “critical queer studies” as an all-encompassing name for all the politically-motivated victim studies programs on what pass for college campuses these days.

“but the social sciences are, for the most part, “good bullshit+consensus=truth.””

Yours truly has a PhD in Psychology – much of which involves “social science”.

And I can affirm that your statement is absolutely spot on.

And when it comes to relationship issues (domestic violence, rape etc) the social science researchers mostly live in a world of make-believe.

It needn’t have been this way, but what has happened is that so many social scientists have lost touch with reality that we can no longer tell (without extremely detailed analysis) who is talking rubbish and who is not.

The psychoanalysts did the same.

Freud started out with some good notions as to what MIGHT be behind our thinking and behaviour but, before long, he and those who followed him took the whole subject way beyond the scope that it could possibly deal with – and they mostly leapt into a world of pure – and ridiculous -fantasy.

Social science – as practised today – needs to be debunked and ridiculed in much the same way that astrology has been; until the social scientists themselves start to shape up and recognise that their subject has significant limitations.

Deep. Thanks for opening up to us. All I can tell by that is that you’re a hedonistic-conservative who really likes baseball and has a way with words. Your probably really good with women also, but never needed PUA, as your a natural asshole. I just hope you direct the enormous fire power of your mouth towards Feminists as much as you do random joes who cross your path. I’m impressed. But Hitler impresses me also. I’d tell you to have fun, but sociopaths generally don’t need any encouragement.

And you’re a bitch. Last word times infinity plus infinity. Gotta play by your rules.

Agreed. It’s definitely not just Women’s Studies. All of the “Social Sciences” suffer from approximately the same problems. I’ll defer to you regarding engineering and mathematics, but the social sciences are, for the most part, “good bullshit+consensus=truth.”

If you guys form a separate man civilization can I join? Something tells me you’ll have the better video games.

And more interesting conversations.