Arrests of women for violent crime have shot up 80% over the last ten years in the UK, and their targets are, quite often, innocent men.
Matthew Campbell, a 38-year-old driver from Grimsby, was out for a night on the town when he was set upon by a mixed gang of men and women who were looking for no more than a thrill. First, he was blindsided by a man who then stood back while a gang of women took over, kicking and stomping the stunned man as he tried to recover from the sudden attack.
Fortunately, the attack was captured on CCTV, and the women were brought to justice, receiving six month jail sentences. As men know, without video evidence of female misbehavior, they are often laughed out of the courtroom, or, even worse, charged with a crime themselves.
Mr. Campbell explained that he was initially hesitant to fight back, saying:
‘You have to defend yourself to some extent. But I’ve never been violent against any woman. I was thinking I’d better not hit back.
‘I had to restrain myself. At one point there were eight or nine sets of hands on me trying to do some damage. Women like this are no strangers to mindless violence.
Fortunately, he woke up at some point during the eight minute assault and managed to break the nose of one of his attackers. However, by that time he had been badly beaten, and was left with a number of wounds, including a shoe print on his face.
From the photos on the article, Mr. Campbell appears to be a fairly burly guy. If he had actually fought back with some strength rather than pulling his punches, it is likely that he could have incapacitated at least a couple of his attackers and chased them off, but he chose not to, because of vestigial chivalry.
Today, in an era of government enforced equality, this is what chivalry is rewarded with: a beating at the hands of drunk, savage women. Giving women a superior legal and social position does not result in better behavior, but rather more crime — apparently from both sexes. Rather than being grateful and responsible, women are using their increased power to misbehave in all areas of life. They are having more affairs, drinking more and killing and maiming people at an unprecedented rate.
The only way to put a halt to this is to give them a taste of true equality. If a woman assaults a man, he should respond exactly as he would if another man did so. If she hits you, hit her back harder. If she pulls a deadly weapon, respond with lethal force if possible. True equality has consequences, and it’s about time that both men and women accepted that and acted accordingly.
{ 76 comments… read them below or add one }
Word.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“and the women were brought to justice, receiving six month jail sentences.”
Find the contradiction.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Well played, sir
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
My eldest son (22) says “Yeah, that’s pretty bad. Over here there drunk, big and black”. And that goes for both sexes.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yep. Fight fire with fire, and realize that while the system is against us *now*, we can change that by devaluing women (to a normal position, lower than their presently exalted one), de-pedestalizing them and fighting back against them. It’s a metaphor for the larger movement.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Welmer,
the trend is disturbing. in america, i’ve also noticed a transition in a traditionally docile group: asian women. in my town, i see asian women with tattoos on their arms. they talk like gangsters. a female friend of a friend was beaten up after closing time at the bar she works at by a group of asian females.
we are witnessing the reverse-gentrification of women in our culture. you posted on the 1912 NY Times piece featuring Carl Jung. I believe he said somewhere in there something to the effect that human behavior cascades down to the lowest common denominator in society. i’m not trying to make this a racial thing, but in both america and the U.K. youths emulate hip hop culture.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
The beating of the man in England kind of puts this Taliban spanking in perspective, doesn’t it?
Girl publicly spanked by Taliban
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Well, to be fair, Chuck, I think white social engineers had a lot to do with the wrecking of the fragile black family — black marriage and family cohesion were far better before the 1960s social programs. It’s just gotten to the point where whites are softened up enough that it’s happening to them as well now.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Seriously though, modern Britain is the best example of how the “struggle for equality” has turned into a race to the bottom for “empowered” women.
It seems that they have inherited all the negative traits of males, however, without any of the distinctly male principles which put restraints on said traits and guide them towards productive and morally good purposes.
Competitiveness without rules or mercy, sexual drives without any long-term considerations, violence without reason, hedonism without boundaries. In short, power without responsibilities. And in most cases of single mothers, these are passed down to sons as well.
Is it any wonder that we may now bask in the glory of a truly equal society, where a sizable part of the population can barely even be called human anymore?
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
And no honor, or sence of fair play !!!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Well, to be fair, Chuck, I think white social engineers had a lot to do with the wrecking of the fragile black family — black marriage and family cohesion were far better before the 1960s social programs.”
Yes. Thomas Sowell and others have written extensively on how black families exhibited similar marital/divorce rates as whites before the Great Society. Also, government mandated minimum wage increased black unemployment since they tended to be less-skilled workers. this directly affected black men and helped lead to a decline in black households. It goes to show how the government muddles up everything it touches.
I guess Jung’s point is that societies tend to “devolve” toward the *unruling* class. There is power in that. It alleviates white guilt. For lack of a better term it’s master/slave mentality.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oh Welmer, I won’t lie. You’ve scared me with this post.
The out of control drinking is something that is/was distinctly apart of lower class Briton.
IIRC, the French drink more alcohol than the British on average so why don’t the French behave in the same manner? How much of this type of violence is cultural influence or a manifestation of other issues ?
A bigger question is how many of those young women grew in TWO parent homes with “healthy”parents.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Chuck–
White guilt is such leftist horseshiite. I feel zero.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The inevitable result of removing strong male role models from young people’s lives.
So glad taking guns and big knives away from adults has helped lower violence against innocent civilians. ‘Cause you know, its the weapons that make people turn in sociopath criminal shitbags.
So sad.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
in = into
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Chuck; Chic–
In Britain lots of whites are on welfare for life, or for a lot of their life. Especially in the midlands and northern industrial cities, or mostly former industrial cities. In contrast in America, though about half of all those on welfare at any given moment are white (while whites are 7x the overall population size compared to blacks), whites are far less likely to stay on it for life than either American blacks or British whites and some immigrants.
Now consider Roissy’s elucidation of the thug way of being alpha to girls and attracting their p*ssies. Maybe not that of church girls like Chic Noir, but that of many.
You can bet these girls were being “empowered” by chav guys who figured, rightly, that this act of girl group dominance over a “dork” (don’t know the Brit term, calling Bhetti) would get them massively energized sex right after. Oh btw, girls would be FAR less likely to do this singly, back up by their bf. Even if it was “safe” for them by e.g. the bf holding a gun on the “dork”. It’s the girl group gang up thing that’s getting them all tingly and making them feel permission, esp. when backed by their thug bf’s.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Welmer says:
This might be true in America but it isn’t in New Zealand or other Pacific Islands. We get feminists writing a whole lot of stuff in Universities on white patriarchy being bad for these cultures and radical feminists blog how the white Patriarchy destroyed them but it is the biggest load of rubbish that comes from their mouths. (and they have a lot of untrue reality coming from them)
The Maori and the Pacific Islands are tribal and before the Europeans came here they were killing each other and some even eating other. They were nothing like the aborigines who were peaceful.
Oh, better say before I finish off that it is OK to talk about history this way even though it still exists today because even the Maori and Pacific Islanders are saying political correctness is harming them and they want to talk the truth openly.
The Maori have upset the leftist big time lately. They have gone far right, even more so than rightwing itself.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
A little guide to making sure your holiday isn’t ruined. Here’s how you know which parts of the tropical paradise you are vacationing to avoid.
Singling them out is easy, whenever a row of 8-9 pot-bellied, dead-eyed men with tattoos showing from under their “footie” jerseys come walking down the street in a neat row drunkenly singing profanity-laden songs at the top of their lungs, or a wildly-fluctuating mass of badly sunburned (truly deserving of the name “redskins”, sorry all you native Americans but you can move over) “ladettes” stumble down the road, drunk by noon already, in their (mildly put) whorish outfits which do nothing to flatter their figures which have deteriorated after a lifetime of takeout fish & chips and kebabs and which give a panoramic view of the badly warped and faded tribal tattoos plastering their bodies, piercing the usual quiet of the Mediterranean with obnoxiously loud laughing (does anybody know we’re having fun yet? Do we need to laugh any louder?), you truly know that the British have arrived.
Another method of checking if the British are at a holiday spot: Look at the prices at a bar. Are there completely unreasonable deals which would give even the biggest alcoholic a hard on? 6 beers, 10 shots of vodka and a bucket of sangria for the price of 5 euros? Time to get out, the British will crowd the place soon enough.
And the last method for checking if you will run across any loyal subjects of her majesty: Are there several police cars at every corner, the officers awkwardly cradling the grips of their submachine guns and telescopic batons, their eyes darting from bar to bar? Are there several ambulances in central locations, the paramedics sitting in them with the doors open, taking long, deep drags from their cigarettes as they gaze off into the horizon with their thousand-yard stares, like Olympic athletes preparing for a marathon? If so, the British are afoot.
If any sign of British tourists manifests itself, get out. Any form of civil entertainment is impossible, and you don’t want to explain to an underpaid police officer that Darrell broke a beer glass on your face because you could not complete a particular line from a Manchester United chant.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
I should say that I witnessed an attempted murder of a man by a woman once.
I was driving down to the neighborhood Safeway in the summertime, and I saw what looked like a woman pounding a guy on the back with her fist. I was stopped at a red light at the time, so I watched for a while. Turns out there was a fairly long knife in her fist (6″ blade), and I saw her hold it up flashing in the sun, and then saw blood running down the man’s back.
The guy was a large black man — maybe 6’2″ and around 250 lbs. The woman – also black – was no runt either, looking to be about 5’8″ and an athletic 160-odd lbs.
When I got to Safeway I called the cops and gave a report. I would have gladly shown up as a witness, but I was never called back after giving a report. I sincerely hope she did some serious time for that. If I’d been armed I might have intervened, but there was a crowd and I was a lone white guy, so I figured it would be stupid to get involved given the circumstances.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I don’t blame them. They must know what’s rotten when they see it.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
well well well. I made a comment about families and look at this jewel here.
All the women, aged between 21 and 42, are members of the same extended family and most of them are well known to the police
Those women are related and WTH is a 42 year old doing jumping someone. Can you imagine the toxic environment they grew up in? How much you wanna bet there was abuse, hardcore drinking & drub abuse, random men, molestation etc.. going on that household.
FYI: I’m not making excuses, I’m simply pointing out when people grow in and or around pathologies, we can expect this type of behavior.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Doug Now consider Roissy’s elucidation of the thug way of being alpha to girls and attracting their p*ssies. Maybe not that of church girls like Chic Noir, but that of many.
Doug, Roissy has it wrong when it comes to how things work in the “inner city” , for the most part, women are attracted to thugs who have large sums of money. A broke thug is not attractive to most of those girls, at least the better-looking girls.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“…it is likely that he could have incapacitated at least a couple of his attackers and chased them off, but he chose not to, because of vestigial chivalry.”
Or is it because he supposed that pummeling them would lead to even more grist for the feminist/leftist mill?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oh, and who could forget the sight of a scantily clad chubby girl sitting in front of a bar at 5 am with her head in her hands, crying profusely while unleashing a veritable anaconda of puke on the sidewalk as a similar example of British femininity, drunk to the point of mental retardation, tries to incoherently console her with badly slurred speech while swaying side to side, barely able to properly sit let alone walk?
The only sight as majestic must be the half-naked blood-drenched youngster who angrily paces the bar street, followed by a brigade of his mates cheering him on about how he did “fook him up proper solid.”
Yes, the British on vacation are truly a force of nature rather than a congregation of people looking for leisure. 2-3 months of every year they befall an otherwise idyllic and sleepy town like a natural disaster, exporting civilization and a new appreciation for all things western to the wogs of the world.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Well since we are on the hate the British topic….
While in Amsterdam, many of the drunks I saw in and around the Red Light District were British. Some of them were so drunk they had to lean on their friends for support. Of course that’s not as bad as some of the news footage I’ve seen where drunken Brits leave clubs fighting and females urinating in public.
@Doug- France has a big welfare system too. My question is, why don’t the French behave the same way? While in Paris, I can’t recall ever seeing groups of French young people so drunk they can’t walk down the street.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Don’t get me started on the british in Amsterdam, holy fuck. I can still even see the looks of my countrymen when the british start binge drinking, a look of disgust. Oh how the mighty have fallen :[
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This comes back to Horseman #4 of the Four Horsemen of Male Emancipation :
4) Men fighting back. Whether protesting against the laws, in the media, or defending themselves physically.
This sort of behavior from women will earn them a backlash, big time.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The Maori have upset the leftist big time lately. They have gone far right, even more so than rightwing itself.
I agree. And that’s why I personally want them to run the men’s movement. They are well onto feminists and they are asking to take over the prisons. Well, why shouldn’t they. 90% of inmates are their people and there is no good in being like America when to comes to prisons and give it to the private sector. The private sector is all about profit and the only way to make profit from prisons is to have more prisoners.
The leftists are angry at this because they think the Maori and Pacific Islanders will introduce programs for men that are not inline with radical feminist thinking. And rightly so they should be afraid. The Maori had Pacific Islanders have been given victim status from feminists and they can’t be a victim and a perpetrator at the same time under feminist ideology. Feminist ideology survives on women being victims to men and they will lose their power if society starts looking at both sides working together. But they have been hit the hardest when it comes to their families being destroyed.
BTW, they are not at a political level anti whites. They are just the way forward for all of us and they want to work together. But I will tell you that I go against the grain of the old view of the men’s movement to think this way.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
One thing to nore though in the pic is that it looks like the dude behind the guy on grounds leg is finishing a swinging motion into his back.
Is there no video of this?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sorry, couldn’t find the video.
The guy in the black coat is actually trying to restrain others from attacking him. This is mentioned in the article.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Luckily enough over here we have enough old-fashioned, honorable stand-up men to keep the worst transgressions at bay.
Any harassment of locals will result in a swift ass-kicking of a magnitude which even a thousand lifetimes of drunken pub brawls, jumping the oblivious and ganging up on the weak won’t prepare you for. Cross the very rigid line and you will find your chav ass outnumbered and outgunned, with no sympathy for your right to self-expression or however you justify your antisocial behavior.
Even the police will not care about your sob stories and will make it amply clear that you are to get the hell out of the police station and the country. No more kid’s gloves, if you break “the truce,” so to speak, you forfeit any legal protection.
The people are honor-bound, so unless you transgressed in a particularly inexcusable way (rape of a local woman or somesuch), they will not kill you if they can help it, but you will get all the spankings you have deserved but never gotten over a lifetime within very few minutes, but with that distinctive flavor of street justice and without the restraint of a father administering them.
And, would you know it, it works. All the typical British antics are contained to the parts where basically no locals live, and as long as you test the rigidity of beer glasses only on the heads of other Brits, the result will only be a half-assed effort by the police to document what happened and a rudimentary stitching up of the victim at a hospital.
It’s sad that the Dutch, especially their men, seem to have backed down in face of their barbarian invasion problem. Because that is what they are, barbarians, so you need to talk the language of violence to state your point.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I didn’t see anything like that(from the British) in Paris (or Sweden) that I can remember? Are the French less tolerant towards drunk Brits?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
These women need beatings to an inch of their lives. If it was me getting attacked, that’s exactly what I’d do. I hope more men say “fuck it” and throw chivalry out the window.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yep…next time I see a guy about to hit a woman? I’ll just smile and think to myself “I hope she’s going to be all happy about calling the femnazi police to arrest this guy after he has broken her jaw or beaten her senseless.” I’ve defended many a woman.
I for one will never defend a western woman again…let’s see how equal they are when their bicyle is being stolen…
Women are children who want ‘princess privilges’ with their ‘zero tolerance to violence against wimmin’ campaigns…just pathetic….Who ever saw a man say ‘zero tolerance to violence against men’? No-one….men know the threat of violence is what keeps our society safe to walk the streets at night…….men will throw your arse in a cage if you commit a crime and that’s pretty ‘violent’.
One of my criteria for women being equal is that they are prepared to defend themselves against me when they are being the obnoxious arseholes they so constantly are. Since I have not yet seen a woman who is prepared to do that they are inferior…children trying to play adults…my definition of women.
And evey married man knows women are wwwaaaaaayyyyyyy more violent than married men. And not to mention women are wwwwwwaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy more hurtful than men. Evidence? Custodial fathers ALMOST NEVER use the children as weapons and rarely ask for ‘child support’ and even more rarely get any. Women? They use the children as weapons more than 50% of the time, which is child abuse, and scream blue murder for ‘child support’ clearly demonstrating that they are inferior and can not provide for the children they chose to have. Women kill more children in the vast majority and beat and physically abuse more children and use emotional abuse to vastly more children than men…Indeed, women are children in charge of children….
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
The brit vs french thing?
The french have a little thing called ‘class’. It is totally absent in the ‘lower classes’ in the UK now….
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
”””’The guy in the black coat is actually trying to restrain others from attacking him. This is mentioned in the article.””’
Thanks for clarification looks like he was finishing a kick.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Cor, I’m gobsmacked by this plonker. He was having a right laugh, letting those pikey slags get away with bashing him in for as long as he did.
British equivalent of dork? Having trouble with this one. First one that jumps into my recall is poof. As in gay. Suppose there’s swot if we’re going for nerd. Toff if member of upper classes. Ponce if we’re talking about overly affected graces.
These kids seem to me the product of a) deranged welfare b) single mothers or incompetent mothers with largely absentee dads i.e. teen motherhood c) divorce and familial instability d) lack of early and strong disciplinarian interventions to both parental transgressions and child.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Indiscriminate chivalry is as nonsensical as indiscriminate lack of it.
Defend only what you value.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This is nothing new. There was a bit in the Daily Mail about more British women getting drunk and puking all over the place, getting arrested for various crimes. Britain has ALWAYS been Hogarthian, a bunch of drunken louts.
ONLY the Victorian effort at repression, substitution of limited beer drinking (“Time Gentlemen”) for unlimited gin, long jail terms for lawbreakers, and such like allowed a social peace to develop between 1850-1962. The Brits are reverting to type. Drunken louts who btw have no real fun. I’ve seen more joy in the most boring Division 1-A football game than any Brit night on the town.
Oh, and btw … more evidence that women HATE HATE HATE beta males!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Chic
I don’t know much about the french welfare system. It would be interesting to compare.
The big problems in Paris aren’t in the center city, where tourists go, but in the “suburbs”, which is where all the public housing is. There’s huge amounts of holiganism among immigrants there, mostly N.African Muslim ones; some subSaharan African ones.
Doesn’t seem to be a huge problem among native French poor though. Not sure why. As I said, I’d look to welfare differences. Not crude ones, subtle ones.
The 1994 welfare reform we did in this country may have good long term results if it isn’t reversed. Part of that was expansion of the Earned Income Tax Credit which I think was and is a very good thing. Some amount of income redistribution but rewards for working rather than idling and being resentful about the hopelessness of everything.
I read welfare reform /term limits was substantially reversed by the Dems/Obama, burried in their highly partisan “stimulus” bill (that created more jobs for female teachers and other female government workers much more than replacement construction and other replacement jobs for men – that I know is true) – but I don’t know how true that is. It was a partisan Repub type source/charge. Doesn’t make it wrong but doesn’t assure accuracy or the whole story. If that’s just a temporary one time mega recession extension, well that’s ok. If it’s a repeal, it isn’t.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“Oh, and btw … more evidence that women HATE HATE HATE beta males!”
Uh, no? Regardless of whether they do or not, I do not see how a man apparently picked at random being brutalized by women shows female disdain for beta males.
Hell, for all they care it could have been roissy walking down that street and they’d still have kicked his ass.
So stop with all the paranoia, even if you have a point it diminishes your ability to argue it.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
whiskey Oh, and btw … more evidence that women HATE HATE HATE beta males
Oh classic whiskey. It’s good to know that you can take the teasing in stride. It’s one of the qualities I like in men. They can take a teasing. My own gender, that can be another story and you guys know how much Chic likes to tease.
doug The big problems in Paris aren’t in the center city, where tourists go, but in the “suburbs”, which is where all the public housing is.
This is true but the poor come into the city because that’s where all of the entertainment is. Some also work in the city and their are working class minority arondisments in the center city.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
There’s huge amounts of holiganism among immigrants there, mostly N.African Muslim ones; some subSaharan African ones.
I can’t think of a source to back me up on this but I would argue that most of the N. African Muslim’s are third generation immigrants so they are caught between two worlds.
A good number of the blk African immigrants are recent and there is a constant influx of blk West African( Senegal, Mali) into France who have more of a traditional African outlook on morality and relatives back home who are dependant on them.
Oh, there are blks from the Caribbean and a smattering of African-Americans(many third gen blk French now) who live in France as well.
Doug Doesn’t seem to be a huge problem among native French poor though.
I think the French have a totally different outlook on what is acceptable in terms of public behavior. I noticed that French children were well behaved in public. It was rare to see a 3-5 year old child fall out in public and the one time that I did, the parents didn’t hesitate to discipline the child. Nobody looked shocked to see a child disciplined in public either.
It was a partisan Repub type source/charge. Doesn’t make it wrong but doesn’t assure accuracy or the whole story.
People are going out of their way to cause confusion. This is the worst time for the BS. I wish both sides would just be honest.
that created more jobs for female teachers
We need more male teachers like Thursday. If there is to be any hope for the millions of American boys who are growing up with dads in the home anyway.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Next time this guy gets attacked by women I hope he has already thought about who he would rather face: a judge, a surgeon or his maker.
Personally I’d go with the judge any day. Not because I have any great faith in them, but because there’s still an element of chance in my favor, however small.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Oh, and btw … more evidence that women HATE HATE HATE beta males!
I would rephrase that to say “Women can be totally indifferent when cruelty is exhibited towards Beta males.”
Not quite the same thing as hate.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
My aunt strangled an old man to death with her bare hands. She was hyped up on crack. Got six years jail time for it.
Her son came to live with us while she was in jail and went from a completely illiterate 4th grader to a honor-roll high school student playing varsity football and in JROTC. Then she got out, demanded he return, and he dropped out of school the next fall. My parents spent major $$$ trying to retain guardianship but the courts said that priority always goes to the birth mother. It was over 10 years ago but my mom still cries about it. He calls them every weekend and comes to visit them from SC at least 3 times a year.
American law is fucked up. And some women are total monsters.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
“American law is fucked up. And some women are total monsters.”
All power and no responsibility, you say?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’m sick to death of the “birth mother” crap. All that woman did was use her son to milk my dad for money. I’m not even going to think about it anymore. It makes me too angry. Some women are not cut out to be mothers and the law should recognize that. What a fucking bitch.
All power and no responsibility, you say?
Hey, you’re preaching to the choir, Dude.
I agree with you guys about the laws. You know I’m with you on that. I’ve just seen too much unbelievable crap in my life. I’ve seen men do some stupid stuff in my time (usually including chasing some tail) but the women do some crazy mean-ass shit.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
“Some women are not cut out to be mothers and the law should recognize that.”
Most women, I’d say.
As a matter of fact, there should be a parental aptitude test to determine if you are fit to be a parent.
Sample questions:
1. A baby is…
a) a life-long commitment demanding a lot of compromise and effort.
b) like a cross between a small dog and a purse.
c) a tool of the patriarchy to enslave women.
2. No child should grow up without…
a) two parents.
b) tiny baby-sized Nike shoes.
c) fuzzy math.
3. Assuming you have a child. You will raise him to be…
a) a functioning individual who respects others and can be released into society.
b) a special little angel who deserves everything good in the world just because he is who he is.
c) able to fit a jumbo-sized condom of meth in his ass.
And so on.
No subjective bullshit, only one right answer for each question, and a single mistake and you are officially an evolutionary dead-end.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
TFH:
“I would rephrase that to say “Women can be totally indifferent when cruelty is exhibited towards Beta males.””
Come on man, that’s Whiskey’s catch-phrase. Can you picture Ed McMahon without “Heeeere’s Johnny” or Edward R. Murrow without “Good night and good luck”?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
As a matter of fact, there should be a parental aptitude test to determine if you are fit to be a parent.
That’s a funny test. My husband often calls for a parental driver’s license.
Yeah, I know plenty of women who would fail that. Like my cousin who just “had to have a baby” and then promptly ignored the ones she has as soon as she delivered them. Children as fashion accessories. *gag*
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Come on man, that’s Whiskey’s catch-phrase.
Perhaps. Hate is different from indifference to cruelty.
My own catchphrases are nestled within the context of my broader theme :
The Four Horsemen of Male Emancipation by 2020 :
1) Game
2) Adult Entertainment technologies
3) Globalization (Islam + expating)
4) Men avoiding chivalry/fighting back
Catchphrases :
1) 80% of Men and 99.9% of women can never, ever grasp Game
2) Real 10 > Artificial 10 > Real 7
3) Men expating out + Islam coming in = The end of US feminsm
4) In Morality, LTR Game > PUA > Socialcon/mangina
These are the For Horsemen of Male Emancipation by 2020.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Being a Brit, I suggest that one of the main reasons why so many of the ‘underclass’ men in the UK behave badly is because they have given up caring for their own country or for their society.
They are, if you like, MGTOW.
And I can’t blame them.
They have had to bear the main brunt of feminism.
After all, only rich people can really afford to avoid the worse excesses of feminism.
For example, rich people can send their children off to private schools, thereby avoiding the awful education in the state sector.
And for the boys, in particular, state education has nothing much to offer them; and it is not suprising that they behave badly as they get older.
In France, the state education system is much better, and it is not as feminist-dominated as in the UK.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The way women have degraded temselves those past forty years leaves me speechless. They seem as though they are on “self-destruct” mode.
I really wonder if their fall will end one day or if they have recessed into a primitive life form.
We should all be very concerned: none of this bodes too well for the future.
We may have to seek our mates elsewhere or accept being dragged down by our own dysfunctional females.
Such a pity a thing like that had to happen.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
“We may have to seek our mates elsewhere or accept being dragged down by our own dysfunctional females.”
For some reason I just had a crazy thought that this might be part of the multicultural plan.
To turn white women into so thoroughly unlikeable creatures which no self-respecting western man would commit to or breed with that western men will have to seek the solution in the arms of foreign brides, resulting in a “new race” emerging, a half-white rainbow if you so will.
Seems like a far shot, but with women so bent on disavowing all they biologically are, including motherhood, and men not having been subjected to a comparable brainwashing by “maleism” or whatever the male equivalent would be, and therefore still willing to breed (but having reduced their willingness to do it with white women as a reaction to their rapid degeneration), it does not seem that unlikely that the number of “white guy, foreign bride” couples will go up.
If I’m not mistaken, statistics show that the most popular females on dating sites such as Okcupid are near-eastern ones, probably due to the fact that they look very close to white women (closer than any other race) and have managed to keep their femininity intact.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Harry,
Would not young lower class British men be better served by moving to a slightly more sane country, like Australia or the US?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
@Johnny Bravo
“For some reason I just had a crazy thought that this might be part of the multicultural plan.”
That is not a crazy thought at all. The plan is to destroy our nations just as much as our families.
@Fifth Horseman
“Would not young lower class British men be better served by moving to a slightly more sane country, like Australia or the US?”
Half of them are below average intelligence. They mostly have no clue what is going on and no idea about the world outside their own.
But emigration from the UK is, in fact, quite high among Brits. I don’t know the figures, but I do know that they are high.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This sort of stuff isn’t limited to the UK:
http://www.thelocal.se/20694/20090716
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This may be one of the reasons Britain’s underclass is so much more degenerate than other European nations – of all the countries in the world, British men have had the greatest opportunities to leave and go where the grass is greener, and for the last 200 years, that’s exactly what they’ve done. No surprises that what remains isn’t too flash.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
No-one really gets punished in the UK for violent crime. Especially women. The only crimes that are pursued by police are “hate crimes” (i.e. thought crime), rubbish bin terrorism (i.e. not seperately your recycleables), and anything to do with driving.
The police only go after law-abiding taxpayers because they can be found, intimidated, and thus result in a “sanction detection” collected in the statistics by which the Chief Constables are rewarded.
Ambush Predator is a good site cataloguing such UK madness
http://thylacosmilus.blogspot.com/search/label/justice%20system
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Chivalry is a very bad habit.
If you have learnt it, it is time to unlearn it. Start right now.
If a woman strikes you first, break her skull. Or do whatever you need to to ensure she learns her lesson and never hits you again, or else. There is nothing taboo or sacrilege about physically retaliating against female attacks.
Another aspect of unlearning chivalry is to ignore. Opening doors, helping with a flat tyre, carrying heavy stuff, general ‘damsel in distress’ situations. Look away. Walk off. Not your problem.
Let’s review: to unlearn chivalry, you must learn to 1) physically retaliate against women, and 2) ignore women when they need help.
It’s fairly simple, but people who have been socially conditioned for years to respect women, be nice to women, not hit women etc… these indoctrinated men will struggle. But it gets easier with time, all you need is the will to deprogram your mind.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Though I’ll generally agree with you on the basis of not helping those who cannot appreciate it or holding back on those who use physical frailty as a shield, I would still help a woman who has proven herself a “lady” (look in the “Country Women” comments section to see a discussion on that), and I do not think that a lady would ever put herself in a position where I’d even have an urge to kick her ass.
Basically, it comes down to positive and negative reinforcement. If you think that you’re a special and precious little snowflake who can treat people any way she wants and that people have to take it and like it, you’re going to dine at Johnny’s very shortly. On the menu: For starters, an entree of face-rocking, followed by the main course, ass-kicking au vin, rounding the whole experience off will be desert, a delicious slice of shit-ruining, and as drink we have a bottle of 1972 smackdown, with a full bouquet and an aftertaste of wild berries and pain.
But I will respond to civilized behavior and respect with civilized behavior and respect myself. I won’t allow the empowered masses to drag me down to their level, but neither am I going to let bullshit slide.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
I follow a simple code that I picked up on an MRA website:
I will act as a gentleman when I’m in the presence of ladies.
That doesn’t happen much. The code is also a good answer to chivalry-based shit tests when gaming:
Girl: Will you buy me a drink?
Me: No.
Girl: Why not? Be a gentleman
Me: I’m only a gentleman when in the presence of ladies.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I’ve been in a situation before where I got kicked, hard, by a woman and I said “If you keep hitting me, I will be forced to defend myself” VERY strongly. She stopped, immediately.
In retrospect, I should have also called the cops but that did not dawn on me in the heat of the moment.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
If you are very firm with a woman early, they don’t try it on. Violence by women is usually just a shit test. Women never ever try to hit me. They can tell by my manner that I’d hit them back, and thus I don’t even have to warn them.
The incident that triggered this article is rather different, being a gang, strangers and alcohol-fuelled but generally speaking women’s violence is the usual cowardly “I’ll do it because I can get away with it” and will be instantly nipped in the but if they realise they can’t get away with it.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
Welmer it has taken me a little time to get round to reading your article. It was doubly interesting to me as Grimsby was my home town as a boy. I lived there for 20 years. Grimsby is very much an out of the way town. In my day it was a fishing port and food processing centre. You can imagine that it was a rough town. That said I never found it to be a dangerous place. Rather it was a place where tough working class people lived. But it has changed dramatically. Much of the heavy industry has gone. Fishing is hardy there any more. The house where I used to live still stands but the alleys at the back where I used to play as a child are now sealed off with iron gates to keep the drug users out. To be honest it is now a forgotten decaying place. I am sure this assault could have happened in many an English town, and probably does. But it is sad for me to see how bad it has become.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
The Fifth Horseman October 26, 2009 at 9:02 pm
“Would not young lower class British men be better served by moving to a slightly more sane country, like Australia or the US?”
Fifth, you think Australia or the US are less messed up than the brits? You gotta get out more my friend.
Sure, Australia is a few years behind the brits in totally f***ing up the society, but not more than 5 years.
Men should leave the west and go east. I lobbed in Germany. For me that’s the best country in the world but I am a very unique case…most well educated western men would be better off moving to countries that were part of the soviet union.
Interestingly enough for other men here. In my claim of right I have included the right to defend myself from anyone who would harm me or those ‘God’ has placed in my care. That includes smacking a woman who assaults me. And since I am no longer subject to any statutes in any common law country I am free to smack a woman one if she is threatening me with physical harm. It’s called ‘equality’..
I really hope I get to try that out one day. I would LOVE to really give some obnoxious bitch a decent smack in the face one day like I have done to plenty of guys. The days of me ‘never hitting a woman’ are gone. Why would I not hit a woman? They are ‘equal’ now.. 
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Krauser October 27, 2009 at 7:19 am
“I will act as a gentleman when I’m in the presence of ladies.”
I have a better one…
“I will act like a gentleman when I am in the presence of a woman who has f***ed my brains out more than 5 times. Apart from that? Who cares what women think and who cares how to act to them?”
In the office I act like a gentleman…emphasis on ‘act’ because now it is an act. I have no respect for western women any more.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Fifth, you think Australia or the US are less messed up than the brits?
As far as I know, Australia does not have Sharia law courts operating outside of AU law. Australia does not have Muslim neighborhoods where the AU police are afraid to go. There are a lot more Brits leaving for AU than the other way around (Shane Warne excluded).
So no, I don’t think AU is quite as messed up as the UK.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Fifth Horseman what wrong with Sharia courts? A man might get a justice in such a court when he never could in a civil court. You seem to have a dislike of Muslims . My only question when assessing these thing is to ask if they are feminists or not. I don’t have any other agenda,
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
You seem to have a dislike of Muslims .
Are you kidding? I have been accused of exactly the opposite around here.
A man going to a Sharia court to avoid enslavement from feminist laws is fully justified in acting in his own interests. Britain as a whole suffers, of course, but it is time that women bore the cost of abandoning their constitution, rather than men.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Okay Fifth Horseman. Actually my real point is that I only ever judge things as an MRA. For me being British or anything else is no longer the point. So if the Martians came that would be fine with me provided they where anti female MRAs.
Like or Dislike:
0 
1
Was there at least one feminist group that had a view about this? Do they ever address when they see their sisters behaving badly? I haven’t done research but I fear this is a common occurence of inaction. I want to hear women speaking out.
Seems like feminists fail to address their own, fail to instruct their kind (woman), other than seek some form of socio-economic freedom/capitalist profit/status hence the galvanising of indifference. Women are becoming increasingly galvanised, rigid in their pursuit for ‘having it all’, or the frustration of not being able to achieve this, resulting in brutish, snappy behaviour.
But there are not many women who want to be told what to do anyhow, by anyone, Feminists aside. Allegiance to a notion of feminism reduces one’s social currency, so women have expressed. Women are individual and uncontrollable, their is no consensus/comradeship/fraternity amongst women. Women tell me how they always hate working with other women.
I want to see/hear women saying to their sisters ‘Looka here, you gotta get your act together and stop misbehaving’, jus like old-school teacha days. Wasn’t Feminism supposed to provide such a moral compass? What type of value framework does Feminism advocate, but for themselves? The bullish ‘ladette’ culture that has ensued shows Feminism has had little idea of how to engage women other than through binary victimhood or attitude. No in-between of advocating some kind of ladiness-refinement/progression.
And no handshakes after the won causes, just more fists.
They could do their part in condemning this Grimsby act, feminists, but it just goes to show how impotent they are.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ach. As a girl, I really hate what’s happening with society. Women turning into harpies. Innocent people getting attacked. Undeserved assaults being brushed off or ignored because the perpetrator was female. ‘Equality’ being reinterpreted as ‘try to behave exactly like men, and succeed only in turning Eve into Adam’s evil twin’. I told my mom and sister about this article, and we all agreed that women who aggress like men should be treated like male assailants, and women who aggress WORSE than men should be laid out flat on their backs.
I agree with Lethargio: feminists need to start advocating responsibility along with the power they demand. I’m about as sick of radical feminism as men are.
All the same, I must confess, I find some of the comments here almost as disturbing as the trend that caused them. Because I’ve made the same mistake that some of you guys are making, and I’ve really come to regret it. Y’see, I used to be something of a manchick myself. I wasn’t cruel or violent toward men, and I didn’t treat them as inferior; but the many of the adult men in my life were pretty poor examples of masculinity – a couple of them being downright abusive – and my male agemates tended to either ignore me or pick on me, so I’ll admit that I had a rather dim view of maledom until recently.
Then I started looking into gender differences, and I started to see a side to both men and women that the environment I grew up in simply hadn’t shown. And I realized I’d made a mistake. I’d never felt like I could count on the men in my life, so I’d tried to become my own man: strong, independent, capable, and hard. I’d always seen femininity as being defined as weakness and subservience, because that’s what I’d seen it treated as, and I wanted nothing to do with it; but when I started to look into it, I realized that it also had good qualities. Softness, gentleness and respectfulness; the courage to be vulnerable, and the ability to inspire and influence with beauty and admiration rather than to nag, order and demand; all of these were innate and favorable traits that I’d tried to suppress. Sure, I can still be strong when I need to be; but there’s more to womanhood than that, and I missed it. I responded to the failings of men by trying to kill off some of the best parts of myself – just like some of you now propose to respond to the failings of women by killing your natural chivalry and protectiveness.
Please, guys, don’t do it. Don’t commit partial internal suicide the way I did.
Why is this so important to me? Why do I bother posting this on a comments thread that’s been dead for months?
Because men – REAL men, and the restoration of real masculinity – are important to me, and I wanted those of you who read this to know how thankful I am for you. Why do you think I started changing my view of womanhood? Because I found out about the other side of manhood – the passionate, dangerous-in-a-good-way, honorable, protective side that I’d seen so little of. Because I realized that women don’t have to be servants or victims, but we don’t have to be ladettes, either. Normally, it’s the lady who inspires the knight; but in my case, it was finding out about the knight in men that inspired me to become a lady again. With a good deal of strength, femininity can be accomplished even when it isn’t valued or rewarded; but it’s only when men are truly being MEN, and when women aren’t competing with or being ignored or devalued by them, that it’s truly safe to be soft, trusting and feminine.
Granted, I’m not saying you should give your chivalry to just anyone, any more than I’d tell a woman to be soft and vulnerable in the face of a rapist. As I said above, some women need to be decked. There are some I’d like to deck myself. But when women shed their good, feminine qualities, and men react by shedding their own good traits, guess what happens? No more good traits left, and Carl Jung’s above-mentioned theory comes true: sociaty drops to the lowest common denominator.
So please, next time you’re thinking about amputating part of who you are as a man, remember the young western woman who used to be in danger of becoming a feminist, and who is instead on the road to recovery and to becoming a lady, partly because some men refused to let ladettes take away the better parts of themselves.
God bless.
Like or Dislike:
2 
0
Stephanie,
Chivalry is what women use to oppress men, to make them disposable, to create servants and slaves.
Chivalry is in the interests of feminism.
Chivalry is what must be destroyed.
The idea that it is a ‘part’ of our identity is an idea imported onto us by feminism.
Quite frankly, I find your claim that I am ‘amputating’ a part of myself by renouncing any kind of chivalry to be bullshit! I define who I am; what could be more ‘manly’ or masculine than that? Not that it matters to you; it matters to ME. I will not define my masculinity by Victorian cultural relics which teach me to pedestalise and prioritise women. THAT is the problem here!
Chivalry is what got us to where we are. IT MUST DIE.
You started off well; I’m glad you see the problem here, and that you think female attackers should be held to the same accountability as male attackers.
But then you veered the fuck off track!
Let me ask you, do you want men to be chivalrous because:
1. it will benefit them, or
2. it will benefit women.
I say we’ve been benefiting women, at our own expense, long enough!
And if you really think that chivalry benefits men, you might want to take a look around the comments of some other threads, and see the testimony of the men whose lives have been DESTROYED because they gave women the benefit of the doubt, in accordance with chivalrous norms.
Here’s a question for any woman who believes in male chivalry …
Would YOU buy ME dinner?
If not, you can expect the door to not be held open for you, but SLAMMED SHUT on your ass as you walk through!
REAL masculinity, my dear, has NOTHING to do with being a doormat for women! In fact, it has NOTHING to do with women WHATSOEVER!
So go chew on THAT truism!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hm, I can see where some of my comments were left rather open for misinterpretation, and I apologize for that. Sorry, Snark.
I should have defined ‘chivalry’ more clearly. I was not talking about the kind of ‘chivalry’ that enslaves men, and requires them to serve women who don’t appreciate it. As I noted above, chivalry should be reserved for people who deserve it. I do not at all believe that women should receive favors from men simply because we’re women, any more than I think women should be submissive to men simply because they’re men.
However, I do believe that men do have a natural tendency to be protective of women who are truly ladylike, and who admire and appreciate them for it. I believe that most, if not all, men have a desire to feel like a hero, and I also believe that when they act accordingly, women should treat them as such. As for material rewards from it, men being chivalrous toward QUALITY women is the same as women giving admiration to men. There isn’t necessarily a physical reward; but when the other party responds favorably, it feels great.
And actually, I didn’t get this from feminists. I first heard this viewpoint from a man. For that matter, I didn’t get my views on chivalry from feminists, either; I’m talking about the kind of innate, freewill protectiveness that predates feminism. If you do not possess that trait, I apologize for attributing it to you. Considering all the reasons feminists have given you to dislike it, I certainly won’t blame you wanting nothing to do with it.
Would I buy you dinner? Probably not, unless you make far less money than me, in which case I might. Would I ask you to buy me dinner? No, I’d buy my own. Just because I’ll acknowledge a need for men in some areas doesn’t mean I want a free ride from them.
I hope that cleared things up a bit, and I apologize for offending you. My point was not to demand that you be a certain way (because obviously, there’s no such thing as a personality trait that EVERY member of a given gender has), but to note that there are still some women out there who admire and appreciate traditionally masculine traits.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
{ 2 trackbacks }