Comments on: The Feminist’s Guide To Debate Tactics http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/ Piercing the Shield of Ignorance Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:23:50 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Turning the Tide: An Object Lesson in “Waging the War,” from the Front Lines http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-30119 Turning the Tide: An Object Lesson in “Waging the War,” from the Front Lines Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:18:29 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-30119 [...] Any time criticism is levied and rational debate sought, they have developed powerful tools (like shaming tactics) that can even bring down people we once perceived having power – politicians, professors, [...] [...] Any time criticism is levied and rational debate sought, they have developed powerful tools (like shaming tactics) that can even bring down people we once perceived having power – politicians, professors, [...]

]]> By: Turning the Tide: An Object Lesson in “Waging the War” From the Frontlines http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-30089 Turning the Tide: An Object Lesson in “Waging the War” From the Frontlines Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:33:34 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-30089 [...] Any time criticism is levied and rational debate sought, they have developed powerful tools (like shaming tactics) that can even bring down people we once perceived having power – politicians, professors, [...] [...] Any time criticism is levied and rational debate sought, they have developed powerful tools (like shaming tactics) that can even bring down people we once perceived having power – politicians, professors, [...]

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29119 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:35:56 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29119 ''For fun, when appropriate, tell her she’s committing a “post hoc ergo propter hoc” error in reasoning. If you’ve ever seen a doggie look confused, you’ll know what i’m talking about.'' Very funny. If I can ever get my mouth around it and have the opportunity, I will. Think I'll look it up first, so I know what I mean. LMAO ”For fun, when appropriate, tell her she’s committing a “post hoc ergo propter hoc” error in reasoning. If you’ve ever seen a doggie look confused, you’ll know what i’m talking about.”

Very funny. If I can ever get my mouth around it and have the opportunity, I will. Think I’ll look it up first, so I know what I mean. LMAO

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29118 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:29:08 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29118 ''the male would 'exceed' that of the female '' Yet the female would expect and receive the same pay for doing less, by law. Female equality, the scales always tip in her favour. ”the male would ‘exceed’ that of the female ”

Yet the female would expect and receive the same pay for doing less, by law.

Female equality, the scales always tip in her favour.

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29117 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:25:21 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29117 ''Give us proof that there was no division of labor on a farm.'' There's division of labour NOW. Recommended weight limit for lifting for males is 25kg, 18kg for females. I know women are supposed to suck at maths but surely they can see that doesn't represent 'equal' measure. Even if one male and female carried the same amount of packages (unlikely because women move like sloths) the weight carried by the male would excede that of the female (just to spell it out for those like someone, incase your logic can't perceive it). ”Give us proof that there was no division of labor on a farm.”

There’s division of labour NOW.
Recommended weight limit for lifting for males is 25kg, 18kg for females. I know women are supposed to suck at maths but surely they can see that doesn’t represent ‘equal’ measure. Even if one male and female carried the same amount of packages (unlikely because women move like sloths) the weight carried by the male would excede that of the female (just to spell it out for those like someone, incase your logic can’t perceive it).

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29111 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:55:06 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29111 '' Mistake #10: “You’re just too immature to handle a relationship with an independent woman!” Not only is it incorrect it's simply untrue. The moment a woman becomes involved in a live in relationship she becomes privileged by law, so the independance ceases to exist. The only way a man can avoid giving her this privilege is to avoid marriage and having children. ” Mistake #10: “You’re just too immature to handle a relationship with an independent woman!”

Not only is it incorrect it’s simply untrue. The moment a woman becomes involved in a live in relationship she becomes privileged by law, so the independance ceases to exist.

The only way a man can avoid giving her this privilege is to avoid marriage and having children.

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29108 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:40:50 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29108 '' So what kind of arguments will MRAs listen to?'' Bravo on this article. I agree. Give us FACTS. Not whining, nagging and whimpering. Or the same old female dogma we've heard, were duped by and now reject. We've heard, '' The world would be a better place if women ran it''. Our eyes tell us that's simply not the case. Accept you're wrong and let men put the crap that's occured straight again. IMO, first step is get rid of this ultra permissive society we've been allowed and encouraged to grow around us. Feminists need this 'thinking' to exist and prosper. Political correctness is the shield they hide behind. It stops the truth of facts being spoken aloud. ” So what kind of arguments will MRAs listen to?”

Bravo on this article. I agree. Give us FACTS. Not whining, nagging and whimpering. Or the same old female dogma we’ve heard, were duped by and now reject. We’ve heard, ” The world would be a better place if women ran it”.

Our eyes tell us that’s simply not the case. Accept you’re wrong and let men put the crap that’s occured straight again. IMO, first step is get rid of this ultra permissive society we’ve been allowed and encouraged to grow around us. Feminists need this ‘thinking’ to exist and prosper. Political correctness is the shield they hide behind. It stops the truth of facts being spoken aloud.

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29105 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:25:51 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29105 Mistake 7: Feminism has been hijacking and riding the back of the civil rights movement to there own ends for decades. Playing on the REAL emotions of men to manipulate more privilege for themselves. The fact our society is steadily going down the toilet as a result of this means nothing to them. Their greed insists they ignore all evidence to their being wrong. Mistake 7: Feminism has been hijacking and riding the back of the civil rights movement to there own ends for decades. Playing on the REAL emotions of men to manipulate more privilege for themselves. The fact our society is steadily going down the toilet as a result of this means nothing to them. Their greed insists they ignore all evidence to their being wrong.

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29104 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:15:45 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29104 @ms pilgrim: Research this yourself. During the industrial revolution there was a milestone in working conditions for men, women and children (at least in the UK so I'll presume similar in the rest of the western world). Employers were forced to allow the eight hour day for women and children but men had to continue with their 12, 14 and 16 hour days. Women were more than happy to be likened to children back then. I presume this because there wasn't a womens movement to insist that they receive the same conditions as men. No suprises there. Then as now women don't seek equality, they seek privilege. The prime reason for this appears (at least to me) is because women wish to be rewarded for giving birth. They may not say it out loud but women believe this. Equality, but we give birth. @ms pilgrim: Research this yourself. During the industrial revolution there was a milestone in working conditions for men, women and children (at least in the UK so I’ll presume similar in the rest of the western world). Employers were forced to allow the eight hour day for women and children but men had to continue with their 12, 14 and 16 hour days. Women were more than happy to be likened to children back then. I presume this because there wasn’t a womens movement to insist that they receive the same conditions as men. No suprises there. Then as now women don’t seek equality, they seek privilege. The prime reason for this appears (at least to me) is because women wish to be rewarded for giving birth. They may not say it out loud but women believe this.

Equality, but we give birth.

]]> By: Harrytoo http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/24/the-feminists-guide-to-debate-tactics/#comment-29102 Harrytoo Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:02:49 +0000 http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=1082#comment-29102 Mistake #5: “Women were too busy taking care of children and doing housework to invent things or discover things!” But not too busy to watch the countless daytime programs directed primarily at them in their millions. These programs wouldn't exist if they didn't watch them. Rule one in the housewifes handbook of how to appear as though you've been busy all day: Leave the ironing until he gets home and do it when he's sat down watching tv. He may feel guilty and do it for you. Mistake #5: “Women were too busy taking care of children and doing housework to invent things or discover things!”

But not too busy to watch the countless daytime programs directed primarily at them in their millions. These programs wouldn’t exist if they didn’t watch them.

Rule one in the housewifes handbook of how to appear as though you’ve been busy all day: Leave the ironing until he gets home and do it when he’s sat down watching tv. He may feel guilty and do it for you.

]]>