Feminist Rantings for your Entertainment

Heh. Poor little feminasties. Can’t deal with real men, and as you point out, shaming language abounds.

So many claims that you’d never get laid again, or have to pay for it. Somehow, I don’t see that as a problem for any of the contributors here. The fems don’t quite understand real men as opposed to manginas.

Personally, I’d rather spend a few hours in the company of any of the authors here than a women’s rights circle jerk. At least I can be assured of lively and robust (is that redundant) conversation, and my intellect would be challenged.

Keep up the good work guys, and between you and me, I wouldn’t be surprised if any of the feminists playing “critic” got a bit wet with those attempts at verbal assault.

Idiots. It’s really a damned shame more women don’t use their logic.

All I can say is thank God I’m single.

Welmer,
Yo, I wanna be down to write for The Spearhead. Holla at me, let’s talk.

As for the topic, like I said on the “Data” thread the other day, I truly hope you don’t moderate anything in the least. Let the world see the truly vacuous, insipid, intellectually and morally bankrupt thing that the modern day Feminist Movement truly is, in their own words. For my part I relish in that, as they squirm and moan their way out of our rock solid arguments.

Notice how few if any of the lady commenters actually took me up on the points I made in Pro Male’s SciFi thread, even when I said, hey, I’m for the Free Market and that if Women want their own SciFi I’m all for it. Note how Marisa couldn’t forge a legit counterargument to the points I made. This is common. And now we know, that we got their number.

So, if there is one thing I ask of you, Welmer, its to please, please, please, do not delete anything from these people; let The Spearhead be a witness to the Bane of Western Civ’s existence.

The rest, will speak for itself.

The Obsidian

Best thing about shaming language is that the moment you grasp the concept it loses all of its power. In fact there’s a reversal, because it’s a “tell” on the vacuity of the opponent.

When you spend most of your social hours in the company of educated men, arguing with manginas and feminists is like splashing through the paddling pool

The vapidness of these rants makes me realize that the situation we men find ourselves in today is of our own making. They’ve ‘won’ because we let them. Seriously, there is no reason for men to ‘go their own way’ or opt out of anything. We just need to push back in our individual lives and collectively when it comes to the courts etc.. and this edifice the feminists and manginas have built will collapse like the house of cards that it is. Not only do they, deep down, want men to act like men but they need us to.

As for Mary Shelley, I remember reading that textual analysis of ‘Frankenstein’ points to Percy Shelley, her husband, as the author. I believe even feminist icon Camille Paglia subscribes to this belief.

The above comments put me in mind of Orwell’s 1984. It might be overlooked that the intention of ‘Big Brother’ was not only that it should be obeyed but that it should also be loved. Indeed that is how the novel end with Winston declaring that he loved ‘Big Brother’. And so it is with the above comments. They can not abide that even in a small corner of the internet there is someone who does not love ‘feminism’. Even in our private thoughts we must only love and think well of feminism and woman.

Welmer let me know if this post elicit a comment about the size of my penis or my inability to get laid.

cubejockey October 16, 2009 at 9:05 am
“the situation we men find ourselves in today is of our own making. They’ve ‘won’ because we let them.”
We are in the situation we are in because guys with guns arrest us, or threaten to arrest us, and put us in jail. Please stop looking at the women and look at the courts. It is the court system that is corrupt. It’s just that they are rewarding women for wielding it against us. Pretty much ALL the issues men have are ‘laws’ that are being enforced by MEN. Us men are so ignorant that we keep looking horizontally at the women and not UP to notice that our real problem is MEN.

We can stop this abuse in court in its tracks using common law and 12 good men on a jury. How many men know that 12 good men can form a jury, judge a judge, and incarcerate him according to their veridict? You can do this TODAY in all common law countries. This is the message I am trying to get across to men. They are very reluctant to hear it. Spearhead time guys….pointy end of the stick. You have the solution to your problems in your own hands. Form dejour juries and throw judges in jail. They might kill a few of us for doing so. But if we get 1,000 men willing to sit on those Juries? They can not kill us all without being obvious about it.

A judge orders that a mans children be taken off him over his objection? If 12 good men call that a crime they can put him in jail. It’s THAT simple. Cops arrest a guy on the ‘must arrest’ policy and put him in jail without due process? The cops can be punished by 12 good men. I am really not sure how to make it any plainer.

We are in the position we are in because 99.999% of men are ignorant. Isn’t this place about piecing the shield of ignorance?

http://www.tpuc.org/Common-Law

Magna Carta 1215:
“[20] A free man shall not be amerced for a trivial offence except in accordance with the degree of the offence, and for a grave offence he shall be amerced in accordance with its gravity, yet saving his way of living; and a merchant in the same way, saving his stock-in-trade; and a villein shall be amerced in the same way, saving his means of livelihood–if they have fallen into our mercy: and none of the aforesaid amercements shall be imposed except by the oath of good men of the neighbourhood”

Notice the requirement for an OATH of good men of the neighbourhood. This means no man can be incarcerated without an OATH from someone of a crime committed. Someone must make an accusation of a crime on an affidavit signed under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability.

[39] No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights and possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land.

Notice that ‘lawful judgement of his equals’ or ‘law of the land’ is required. And by ‘law of the land’ they mean common law, not statutes. Lawful judgement of his equals is a jury trial. These laws are still in place across the former british empire.

Lastly, please notice:

“[45] We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or other officials, only men that know the law of the realm and are minded to keep it well.”

This means that any man who takes the oath of ‘peace officer’ is taking on the obligation to know the law and minded to keep it well. Therefore ignorance of that law is no excuse.

Paul October 16, 2009 at 10:18 am

You’re just intimidated by a ’strong and independent’ woman, who only needs her child support payments (from three different fathers), her female-only scholarship to study the enemy at college, and work as a stripper before marrying a rich feminist man, who will defer to me until I am bored of him, where I will divorce him, take him to the cleaners and turn lesbian.

You must have a really big penis, lots of girlfriends…I mean you must have a really small….oh never mind, its all your fault for confusing me!!!

“Marie Curie got 1/3 of a nobel prize and most likely because her huband wanted to get laid. Women are pathetic. Even their ‘heros’ are fakes.”

You’ve posted a lot of dumb shit on this site GM, but this takes the cake. Marie Curie won TWO Nobels, and is regarded as one of more brilliant minds to ever walk the face of the planet.

Fuck you.

Speaking of female nerds, the “geek feminists” of geekfeminism.org have had almost every opensource thing I’ve contributed to the free-software movement deleted from sourceforge (the main hosting website for the opensource world). I wrote about it on mikeeusa.pressword.com . They’ve had my perl terminal videogames deleted (gpcslots2 and rpg1 (a text based casino simulator and an RPG)), my miscellaneous utilities deleted (useful for searching through RAM, etc), and my ~40 Nexuiz maps deleted (3d maps for the videogame nexuiz which took 3 years of almost continious effort to make). They have sought out pretty much any place I have an outlet on the net and campaigned to have it removed. They are also trying to have me imprisoned. Could you shine light on this?

The geek feminists are trying and have been succeding in kicking anti-feminist men out of opensource (Like how they had Ted (Jonathan) Walther kicked out of debian some years back). The geek feminists do NOT produce anything, it is the men who create free-software. Yet we are being brought to heel. What can be done?

Women are better then men……except…

http://poststuff4.entensity.net/100909/flash.php?media=mvw.flv

Very funny….give this to the femnazis…

The recipe spam was really funny though. Gotta give a little credit for that unless they cut and pasted instead of typing it out all over again.

Krauser said: “Best thing about shaming language is that the moment you grasp the concept it loses all of its power. In fact there’s a reversal, because it’s a “tell” on the vacuity of the opponent.”

And we see the following nuggets from the various icons of, ‘Logical Male Thought” in this magazine:

“One female blogger writes about “rage blackouts that threatened to destroy my ability to retain what my eyes were seeing” (got Midol?). ” (from the post “Data and denuciations).

Yep, because the only reason someone telling an entire class of people to get out of “his” swimming pool (even though the pool is public, and nothing stops him from reading Johnny Ringo, S.M. Stirling, David Weber, David Drake, Kim Stanley Robinson, John Gardner, etc), might be annoyed is she’s having her period.

Right in this thread we see, “Bunch of pathetical attempts of trolling. I know that we should expose feminists as what they are and all, but seriously, that just scream “I’m single and need attention”.

Which is the same language being decried.

Globalman (heckuva name there… One World Order Much?) seems to think the US is a common law country (and, oddly, that all such countries are the same; and in some way non-changeable). Since we are not a common law country (though descended from one), his argument for “insurrection by law” (for want of a better term) fails on its face.

When one ponders that the the quirk of common law is that none of it is permanent, his assertions that “all common law countries” allow such a thing is somewhat ridiculous.

But really, the premise of most of the writing here is of a similar vein. Arguing that the Gulliver’s Travels (or Utopia) were SF is fatuous. They were in keeping with any number of writings in the class of “fabulans” being discussions of either how the world was (GT, and it being a political satire) or how it could never be (Utopia).

They certainly don’t fall into the trope of “Manly Men Solving Things Through Science”. Trying to steal Mary Shelley’s acheivement through a single reference to a textual analysis of the work which then claims her husband (not the most stereotypically “manly” of men, what with is relationship with Byron) isn’t all that much of a show of certaintly in the cause (which I keep seeing defended as, “one or two names don’t a refutation make”, never mind that the collection of names adds up to a fair bit, and none of that takes into account the problems of institutional biases against women; which is why Leigh Brackett, Andre Norton, James Tiptree, et alia, had to resort to neuter/pseudononymous names; but I digress).

The real problem with your magazine, and why you will continue to get the sorts of (sadly validating) responses is that you are so damned defensive. If you don’t like Modern SF ™, don’t read it. There is lots of “man porn” out there. With Guys killing monsters and solving problems. Look to the various Libertarian Presses. Read that.

Because the sad fact of the matter is, the world isn’t what it was 40 years ago when I was young (and thank god for that… it’s a helluva lot better. I get laid more, have a better sense of place, and don’t have to deal with the side effects of an entire half the population being stifled; legally, socially, emotionally).

You don’t like it? Too bad. You are losing the battle. Enough of us DO like it that your mewlings about how oppressed you are aren’t going to reverse the trend.

So get over it, grow up, and move on.

@Amused

“Because the sad fact of the matter is, the world isn’t what it was 40 years ago when I was young (and thank god for that… it’s a helluva lot better. I get laid more, have a better sense of place, and don’t have to deal with the side effects of an entire half the population being stifled; legally, socially, emotionally).”

Perhaps you should spend less time reading SciFi fiction and more time trying to understand what has been going on for the past 40 years; and why.

Indeed, why are you here at all? – wasting your time with us losers?

Haven’t you got better things to do?

Obviously not!

Best thing about shaming language is that the moment you grasp the concept it loses all of its power. In fact there’s a reversal, because it’s a “tell” on the vacuity of the opponent.

Accusations of raaaaaaaaacism are like that, too.

Ada Lovelace and Marie Curie are laughing at you.

Did they write science fiction? If not, what is the relevance of this?

Dialog is necessary for change. Otherwise, we have Group A shouting cries of misogyny on one side, and Group B shouting cries of misandry on the other. No one is listening…only soapboxing through a post that is followed by like-minded commenters. There is little dialog. As a result, there is no room for change.

Ironically, your site makes the same mistake as the feminist blogs that I follow: arguments are made passionately, and the writer moves on. The environment of the website(s) are vitriolic and emotional and this leaves members of the Group B in that context discouraged to engage in dialog.

Are your goals a consistent, rational argument, strengthened over time through citable evidence that is more involved than anecdotal (that reminds me of this one time…) evidence? Occasionally I see a post listing stats, but the are interpreted by a lay reader and not the researchers that did the work.

I, for one, encourage discussion by all sides, as long as we can engage each other as adults.

But it’s so much easier to make with the insults!

Ironically, the insults are a clear way of knowing that the original point was correct and those who disagree can only do it through insults or “emotional logic” (I’m offended so you have to shut up!). No logical discussion by the opponent is a win for the team.

I for one welcome such feminazi vitriol, since it offers much insight into female and feminist psychology and motivation, revealing the evolutionary essence of the female gender, even as they deny that such an essence exists.