<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Paradise Lost of Seduction Literature: A Review of Bang by Roosh V</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/</link>
	<description>Piercing the Shield of Ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:29:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekend notes: digital breast fondling, and Roosh&#8217;s new book</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-33274</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekend notes: digital breast fondling, and Roosh&#8217;s new book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 10:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-33274</guid>
		<description>[...] If you need a REASON to buy &#8216;em, I reviewed both books over at The Spearhead. From my Bang review: But if style is queen, then content is king, andÂ Bang more then delivers in this regard. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you need a REASON to buy &#8216;em, I reviewed both books over at The Spearhead. From my Bang review: But if style is queen, then content is king, andÂ Bang more then delivers in this regard. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roosh Offering Bang! Special for Spearhead Subscribers</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-31995</link>
		<dc:creator>Roosh Offering Bang! Special for Spearhead Subscribers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-31995</guid>
		<description>[...] Fortunately, Roosh has put together a good book on the subject which is, according to Ferdinand Bardamu&#8217;s review, &#8220;a title that anyone interested in improving their success with women should buy, post-haste.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fortunately, Roosh has put together a good book on the subject which is, according to Ferdinand Bardamu&#8217;s review, &#8220;a title that anyone interested in improving their success with women should buy, post-haste.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mailbag: The Literary Canon of Game</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-30338</link>
		<dc:creator>Mailbag: The Literary Canon of Game</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-30338</guid>
		<description>[...] Bang by Roosh VÃ¶rekÂ - It&#8217;s game for the rest of us, and by &#8220;us&#8221; I mean &#8220;people who aren&#8217;t socially retarded nerds.&#8221; For more, readÂ my review. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bang by Roosh VÃ¶rekÂ - It&#8217;s game for the rest of us, and by &#8220;us&#8221; I mean &#8220;people who aren&#8217;t socially retarded nerds.&#8221; For more, readÂ my review. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welmer</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-25664</link>
		<dc:creator>Welmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-25664</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Is BANG available at book stores?

-Robert&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think so. I think it&#039;s only available as an e-book for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Is BANG available at book stores?</p>
<p>-Robert</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so. I think it&#8217;s only available as an e-book for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-25663</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-25663</guid>
		<description>Is BANG available at book stores?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is BANG available at book stores?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game goes mainstream &#171; In Mala Fide</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-9465</link>
		<dc:creator>Game goes mainstream &#171; In Mala Fide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-9465</guid>
		<description>[...] any of you are still relying on Mystery-style routines and canned material, you&#8217;d best start brushing up on unscripted game, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] any of you are still relying on Mystery-style routines and canned material, you&#8217;d best start brushing up on unscripted game, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Can Only Hit Your True Potential By Getting Rejected Â» Roosh V</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-6370</link>
		<dc:creator>You Can Only Hit Your True Potential By Getting Rejected Â» Roosh V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-6370</guid>
		<description>[...] to doing approaches before sharing openers I recommend you use. Here&#8217;s an excerpt from an in-depth review of Bang in The Spearhead (by Ferdinand Bardamu&#8217;s ): As a general rule, 90 to 95 percent of the pickup artist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to doing approaches before sharing openers I recommend you use. Here&#8217;s an excerpt from an in-depth review of Bang in The Spearhead (by Ferdinand Bardamu&#8217;s ): As a general rule, 90 to 95 percent of the pickup artist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welmer</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Welmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Obsidian, comments are not moderated unless you post two or more links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obsidian, comments are not moderated unless you post two or more links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obsidian</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Obsidian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-772</guid>
		<description>Testing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug1</title>
		<link>http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/10/02/the-paradise-lost-of-seduction-literature-a-review-of-bang-by-roosh-v/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 04:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the-spearhead.com/?p=480#comment-610</guid>
		<description>Tupac--

I couldn&#039;t agree more with you that most PUA game advice is oriented towards college girls or anyway under 25s.  Especially of the &quot;world is my oyster&quot; show me some thrills that aren&#039;t too scary American or Anglosphere upper middle class white variety. 

There is a crude PUA story that Roissy does to some extent promote as well that as girls get older than 25 and especially as they approach and exceed 30 many of them go into marriage &quot;panic&quot; mode and after a period of bitter cursing of &quot;men&#039;s unwillingness to commit&quot; (meaning men as alphaish as the ones they could bang without real commitment), they start looking to settle for a lesser alpha or higher beta or if a six or lower or a seven who&#039;s particularly emotionally unattractive or has made real bad life choices, shudder even a middle beta (which guys take up two numbers in the 10 scale and are where the male numbers are).  

There&#039;s a fair amount of truth to that.

There&#039;s also a fair amount, at least an equal amount, of truth to women becoming actually attracted to a somewhat different mix as they get older.  After all teen girls typically care more about pretty boy kinds of looks than older girls with more sexual and other life experience do.  Often a whole lot more.  Late twenties and older girls typically do care a lot more about loyalty, love and hypergamous income than early twenties girls do, especially when those early twenties girls aren&#039;t from hunger.  Care as in are physically attracted to as well as  making a cold calculation in that direction.  Note this is a shading thing.  32 yo girls aren&#039;t a whole lot more attracted to rich but obese and Asphy 42yo guys of indifferent status than 24yo girls are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tupac&#8211;</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with you that most PUA game advice is oriented towards college girls or anyway under 25s.  Especially of the &#8220;world is my oyster&#8221; show me some thrills that aren&#8217;t too scary American or Anglosphere upper middle class white variety. </p>
<p>There is a crude PUA story that Roissy does to some extent promote as well that as girls get older than 25 and especially as they approach and exceed 30 many of them go into marriage &#8220;panic&#8221; mode and after a period of bitter cursing of &#8220;men&#8217;s unwillingness to commit&#8221; (meaning men as alphaish as the ones they could bang without real commitment), they start looking to settle for a lesser alpha or higher beta or if a six or lower or a seven who&#8217;s particularly emotionally unattractive or has made real bad life choices, shudder even a middle beta (which guys take up two numbers in the 10 scale and are where the male numbers are).  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a fair amount of truth to that.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also a fair amount, at least an equal amount, of truth to women becoming actually attracted to a somewhat different mix as they get older.  After all teen girls typically care more about pretty boy kinds of looks than older girls with more sexual and other life experience do.  Often a whole lot more.  Late twenties and older girls typically do care a lot more about loyalty, love and hypergamous income than early twenties girls do, especially when those early twenties girls aren&#8217;t from hunger.  Care as in are physically attracted to as well as  making a cold calculation in that direction.  Note this is a shading thing.  32 yo girls aren&#8217;t a whole lot more attracted to rich but obese and Asphy 42yo guys of indifferent status than 24yo girls are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
