As a general rule, 90 to 95 percent of the pickup artist literature available today is garbage. Most of these clowns are snake oil salesmen hocking overpriced e-books and DVD box sets containing info you can just as easily find online for free. There are, however, a select few books on game that are worth buying, and Bang, Roosh’s entry into this expanding field, is one of them. If The Mystery Method is the Bible of seduction literature, Bang is the Paradise Lost, and is a title that anyone interested in improving their success with women should buy, post-haste.
The first great thing about Bang is that it’s a book. Not a dinky little PDF file that you have to read on your goddamn computer or spend reams of ink printing out, but a corporeal, dead-tree and print BOOK. You can put it on your nightstand, stick it in your bookshelf, and carry it with you to peruse when out and about. If you put a premium on being able to hold a book in your hands while you read, like I do, Bang is a godsend.
Merely from the standpoint of diction, Roosh’s book is miles ahead of its competitors. Anyone acquainted with the seduction community knows that it’s a swirling cauldron of nerdiness and weirdness, with its own vocabulary of “HB10s,” “IOIs”, and “neg hits.” Hell, the obnoxiously pretentious term “pickup artist” was invented so these geeks could pretend to set themselves apart from the rest of us grinders. In contrast, Roosh writes like a normal human being instead of a social retard. You won’t have to worry about coming across an undefined three-letter acronym every other page, necessitating a trip to the glossary and taking you out of the moment. He even refers to men who sleep with a lot of girls by the normal term: “player.” Solely in this regard, Bang is a much better read than almost all of the seduction literature on the market.
But if style is queen, then content is king, and Bang more then delivers in this regard. Roosh’s major innovation is the use of unscripted material in his game alongside standard canned material. For example, he introduces the concept of the “environmental opener,” which is a way of opening a girl with a line based on what’s happening in the surrounding environment. Additionally, he also writes on “conversational threads” as a way to hold a conversation with a girl that is both natural and holds her interest. The book is also rich with examples that allow you to contextualize the lessons. Given that scripted lines eventually become played out as dudes use them on chicks over and over, the ability to incorporate unscripted material into your game is a necessity if you want to stay on the circuit. If you’re having trouble in this department, you’d do well to pick up Bang for that reason alone.
Finally, as a beginner’s handbook to handling women, Bang is easily one of the best resources available. In the book, Roosh breaks down the process of seduction in a coherent game plan that anyone can follow. The meat of Bang is broken down into chapters Internal Game (the attitudes you must internalize before you set out to approach women), Early Game (the stages of approaching, opening, and getting a girl’s interest), Middle Game (what you should do on a date), and Late Game (getting her to have sex with you once you’ve gotten her home). And unlike *certain* guides that expend too much ink on early game and almost nothing on the other aspects of seduction, Roosh devotes equal time to each section, breaking down everything in meticulous, loving detail. He even goes so far as to outline the most efficient way you should disrobe your woman once you’re making out in the bedroom. And if that isn’t enough, Roosh includes a handy appendix at the end for dealing with specific situations, such as the best way to approach a girl at a coffee shop. If you’re new to game, Bang is an absolute must-buy.
The biggest problem with Bang is its laser-like focus on approaching in bars and nightclubs. This is a failing with seduction literature in general, so I can’t really blame Roosh for this, but even still, it’s disappointing. While Roosh does include pointers for non-alcoholic venues both in the main text and the appendix, they seem more like afterthoughts. As I’ve written before, there is a dearth of worthwhile day game information available now, and whoever writes a comprehensive manual on the subject will be raking in the dough (hint hint).
But aside from the minor dent, Bang is a more than worthwhile entry into the seduction market. If you’re starting out in the game or looking to take your skills to the next level, Roosh’s book is a invaluable resource and a must-read.
Subscribe to The Spearhead Newsletter for a free copy of the Book of Zed





{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }
“You won’t have to worry about coming across an undefined three-letter acronym every other page, necessitating a trip to the glossary and taking you out of the moment.”
Good observation. This is one of Game teachings biggest weakness.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Re day game, Paul Janka penned a 17 page pdf as a book proposal outlining his day game in NYC. Don’t think he ever made a book of it. Here:
http://blog.juliaallison.com/Images/Paul%20Janka%20-%20Getting%20Laid%20in%20NYC.pdf
(On some chick’s blog too, which isn’t bad.)
One problem with Janka game though (as a model for most guys) is that the guy is pretty damn good looking, and exudes natural alpha. He’s also aparently a Harvard grad. He is overcoming things – a lousy job and a tiny apartment. Though as a twenty something H grad many girls will overlook those things.
He basically just counsels ways to overcome approach anxiety, keeping the initial encounter really brief, keeping large numbers of balls in the air at one time to facilitate not chasing and moving on quickly when there’s much resistance, and similar.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Just to recommend an ebook reader as a viable alternative to PC reading if you have to/want to read ebooks in any regular basis. I expect they’ll be becoming increasingly popular as time goes on. The technology is progressing quite well, with reportedly good similarity to real books via e-ink technology.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Good review. Just a suggestion, but it would make sense to post this on Amazon as well.
On the various e-books out there in the community, it isn’t so much that they’re useless as that most of the information is rehashed from one so called “guru” to the next.
I’m also wondering if we’re seeing the beginning of a trend with more and more of these books getting published in actual “dead tree and print” form vs. e-books. It would make sense given that the e-books can be copied at will and distributed so easily. I noticed on Amazon that the new Magic Bullets is up there in print and I know Jeffy from RSD published his new book in print as well.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
The biggest problem with Bang is its laser-like focus on approaching in bars and nightclubs.
One of my long-standing complaints about the seduction community is its focus on venues and behaviors befitting the college-aged crowd. While it is true that some principles of seduction are universal, the fact remains that the sort of devil-may-care attitude that works with sorority sluts at a kegger doesn’t quite cut it among older, classier women.
I’ve also been thinking that something which needs more focus in the seduction community is a greater appreciation for the various “styles” of seduction, and how to properly orient oneself to the style that best fits ones personality. There is a lot of misinformation out there when people report from the field how Guy A did “X” and was able to bang lots of chicks. Then someone else reports how Guy B did “Y” and got the same result, even though the approaches were totally different.
What has happened in the community is that people are seeing the X’s and Y’s, and figuring that since these behaviors have passed the field-report test, that therefore they should apply X and Y willy-nilly, never realizing that the two approaches are not congruent to each other, to say nothing of congruency with oneself.
I think a better appreciation of one’s individual personality, and a greater attempt matching it to the various seduction styles out there, would go a long way to shortening the learning curve for a lot of newbies.
As Roissy says, incongruency is the vag-killer, and it is oh so true.
In closing, yeah, Bang rocks. No bullshit, the real motherfucking deal y’all.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Tupac – good points there. One has to have a critical eye when reading field reports and other community materials, and also a certain amount of self-awareness to understand where your sticking points are and how to address them.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
“Good observation. This is one of Game teachings biggest weakness.”
True. But it’s also an invaluable strength, since it allows pickup artists to share a common vocabulary and advance the “bleeding edge” of the field. Without the weird acronyms and geeky intellectualism, the seduction community would be nowhere near what it is today.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Read Bang a few weeks ago. Good stuff, even though I differ from the author regarding the ultimate aim. It may be the conservative upbringing, or the low libido, but I place no intrinsic value in the notch count, apart from calibration purposes. Instead I’m still aiming for the lifetime relationship option. If that proves to be unattainable, I have to rethink my principles.
But, as stated in the book’s opening chapter, finding that ‘hot and nice’ girl isn’t going to happen on its own, so it’s necessary to start building proficiency in game and other attributes that separate me from the pack. Bang is really beginner-friendly for that purpose and I especially appreciated the conversation-opening tips. Like a lot of great advice, it’s obvious in retrospect and easily adaptable to your personality.
I’m seeing results already, with about 50-50 distribution of opening conversations in passing situations I’d never had done before and getting approached by women due to things I’ve consciously started doing since discovering game literature. And ‘game literature’ in this case doesn’t mean just Bang, there is a lot of latent knowledge to be absorbed from the Roissysphere plus some handy practical tips (all the Assanovas and other guys).
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Tupac–
I couldn’t agree more with you that most PUA game advice is oriented towards college girls or anyway under 25s. Especially of the “world is my oyster” show me some thrills that aren’t too scary American or Anglosphere upper middle class white variety.
There is a crude PUA story that Roissy does to some extent promote as well that as girls get older than 25 and especially as they approach and exceed 30 many of them go into marriage “panic” mode and after a period of bitter cursing of “men’s unwillingness to commit” (meaning men as alphaish as the ones they could bang without real commitment), they start looking to settle for a lesser alpha or higher beta or if a six or lower or a seven who’s particularly emotionally unattractive or has made real bad life choices, shudder even a middle beta (which guys take up two numbers in the 10 scale and are where the male numbers are).
There’s a fair amount of truth to that.
There’s also a fair amount, at least an equal amount, of truth to women becoming actually attracted to a somewhat different mix as they get older. After all teen girls typically care more about pretty boy kinds of looks than older girls with more sexual and other life experience do. Often a whole lot more. Late twenties and older girls typically do care a lot more about loyalty, love and hypergamous income than early twenties girls do, especially when those early twenties girls aren’t from hunger. Care as in are physically attracted to as well as making a cold calculation in that direction. Note this is a shading thing. 32 yo girls aren’t a whole lot more attracted to rich but obese and Asphy 42yo guys of indifferent status than 24yo girls are.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Testing…
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Obsidian, comments are not moderated unless you post two or more links.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Is BANG available at book stores?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
I don’t think so. I think it’s only available as an e-book for now.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
{ 6 trackbacks }